Una reportera descubre lo que parece ser un encubrimiento de los riesgos de seguridad en una central nuclear.Una reportera descubre lo que parece ser un encubrimiento de los riesgos de seguridad en una central nuclear.Una reportera descubre lo que parece ser un encubrimiento de los riesgos de seguridad en una central nuclear.
- Nominado para 4 premios Óscar
- 9 premios y 16 nominaciones en total
Khalilah Camacho Ali
- Marge
- (as Khalilah Ali)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe first script for the film was written in the mid-1970s. Michael Douglas initially wanted to produce this film immediately after Alguien voló sobre el nido del cuco (1975). Jack Lemmon agreed to play his role as early as 1976. Douglas was enormously grateful to Lemmon, as he remained ready to start work at very short notice for over a year before production started, in the process passing up other work. To return the favor, Douglas amended the shooting schedule to allow Lemmon to attend rehearsals for the Broadway play Tributo (1980), the film version of which would later star Lemmon.
- PifiasIn the United States, there are two main types of commercial power reactors: PWR (Pressurized Water Reactor) and BWR (Boiling Water Reactor). When Gibson is explaining the basic workings of the plant to Kimberly Wells, the diagram on the board shows a PWR. This is indicated by the two-loop system in which the water is pumped through the reactor under high pressure to prevent boiling, then through a steam generator to create steam for the turbine using clean secondary water. Later, the dialog of the characters in the control room suggests they are dealing with a BWR, where water is allowed to boil in the reactor vessel, and steam is directly piped to the turbine, with no steam generator. Godell is concerned that the high water level in the reactor might reach the steam lines, of which there are none on a PWR vessel. Once Goddell and the operators realize the water level is low, the dialogue refers to Auxilary Feedwater, which is a PWR system. Also, in the action hearing later, the investigator talks about how the operators began cutting off feedwater and releasing steam in order to lower the reactor water level; this would happen only on a BWR.
- Citas
Jack Godell: What makes you think they're looking for a scapegoat?
Ted Spindler: Tradition.
- Créditos adicionalesThe end credits run in total silence.
- ConexionesFeatured in The Making of 'The China Syndrome' (1979)
- Banda sonoraSomewhere In Between
by Stephen Bishop
Reseña destacada
When "The China Syndrome" debuted, many nuclear experts thought the film was bad fiction and said as much. However, only 12 days later, the Three Mile Island disaster occurred and made what happened in the movie look incredibly prescient.
Kimberly Wells (Jane Fonda) is a 'fluff' reporter for the local news. In other words, her stories are human interest pieces and aren't exactly biting news. However, when she's receiving a tour of a new nuclear power plant, she and her film crew witness some sort of averted disaster. Oddly, however, despite the film they got, their station refuses to air it or a report on the near disaster.
Shortly after this, one of the supervisors at the power plant (Jack Lemmon) is scared when he realizes the company which made the plant cheated. Instead of X-raying all the components as mandated by law, they faked them. This, combined with a leak, convince him that the plant is a potential time bomb...and returning it to full power might precipitate a melt down of the nuclear core...which would be VERY bad. At this point, someone, probably big-wigs with the company, begin to play hardball...as it appears they'll stop at NOTHING to get the plant back up on line even if it's not 100% safe. What's next? See the film.
I wasn't surprised at all at the film's anti-nuclear power message. What surprised me is that this film is actually an exciting suspense story...much like "Coma" or "The Parallax View" with an evil organization and the 'little guy' trying to expose this.
So is it any good? Well, with actors like Jack Lemmon, Jane Fonda and Michael Douglas, of course the acting is top-notch. The story, while a bit over-the-top, is still, despite this, believable enough that you find yourself glued to the screen. It is a super-paranoid story...and that is the film's strength. Well made...tense and very exciting....and incredibly well-timed. And, whatever you think of nuclear power, it's a film well worth your time.
Kimberly Wells (Jane Fonda) is a 'fluff' reporter for the local news. In other words, her stories are human interest pieces and aren't exactly biting news. However, when she's receiving a tour of a new nuclear power plant, she and her film crew witness some sort of averted disaster. Oddly, however, despite the film they got, their station refuses to air it or a report on the near disaster.
Shortly after this, one of the supervisors at the power plant (Jack Lemmon) is scared when he realizes the company which made the plant cheated. Instead of X-raying all the components as mandated by law, they faked them. This, combined with a leak, convince him that the plant is a potential time bomb...and returning it to full power might precipitate a melt down of the nuclear core...which would be VERY bad. At this point, someone, probably big-wigs with the company, begin to play hardball...as it appears they'll stop at NOTHING to get the plant back up on line even if it's not 100% safe. What's next? See the film.
I wasn't surprised at all at the film's anti-nuclear power message. What surprised me is that this film is actually an exciting suspense story...much like "Coma" or "The Parallax View" with an evil organization and the 'little guy' trying to expose this.
So is it any good? Well, with actors like Jack Lemmon, Jane Fonda and Michael Douglas, of course the acting is top-notch. The story, while a bit over-the-top, is still, despite this, believable enough that you find yourself glued to the screen. It is a super-paranoid story...and that is the film's strength. Well made...tense and very exciting....and incredibly well-timed. And, whatever you think of nuclear power, it's a film well worth your time.
- planktonrules
- 14 ago 2023
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- La síndrome de la Xina
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Sewage Disposal Plant, El Segundo, California, Estados Unidos(plant exteriors)
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
Taquilla
- Presupuesto
- 6.000.000 US$ (estimación)
- Recaudación en Estados Unidos y Canadá
- 51.718.367 US$
- Recaudación en todo el mundo
- 51.718.367 US$
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was El síndrome de China (1979) officially released in India in English?
Responde