PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
7,2/10
13 mil
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Frank Bigelow, al que le han dicho que ha sido envenenado y que solo le quedan unos días de vida, intenta averiguar quién lo mató y por qué.Frank Bigelow, al que le han dicho que ha sido envenenado y que solo le quedan unos días de vida, intenta averiguar quién lo mató y por qué.Frank Bigelow, al que le han dicho que ha sido envenenado y que solo le quedan unos días de vida, intenta averiguar quién lo mató y por qué.
- Premios
- 1 premio en total
Beverly Garland
- Miss Foster
- (as Beverly Campbell)
Cay Forester
- Sue
- (as Cay Forrester)
Frank Jaquet
- Dr. Matson
- (as Fred Jaquet)
Lawrence Dobkin
- Dr. Schaefer
- (as Larry Dobkin)
Bill Baldwin
- St. Francis Hotel Desk Clerk
- (sin acreditar)
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesThe scene in which Bigelow runs in panic through the streets after learning he has been poisoned was what is considered a 'stolen shot' where the pedestrians along the sidewalk had no idea a movie was being made and no warning that Edmond O'Brien would be plowing through them.
- PifiasAfter finding out who's in the photo, Bigelow leaves the photography studio and immediately starts getting shot at. He heads toward the factory (screen right) where the shots are supposed to be coming from, but all the shots being fired and ricocheting off the ground, pipe, barrel, etc. are coming from the other direction (screen left).
- Citas
[first lines]
Homicide Detective: Can I help you?
Frank Bigelow: I'd like to see the man in charge.
Homicide Detective: In here...
Frank Bigelow: I want to report a murder.
Homicide Captain: Sit down. Where was this murder committed?
Frank Bigelow: San Francisco, last night.
Homicide Captain: Who was murdered?
Frank Bigelow: I was.
- Créditos adicionalesThe end credits read "The medical facts in this motion picture are authentic. Luminous toxin is a descriptive term for an actual poison. Technical Adviser, Edward F. Dunne, M.D."
- Versiones alternativasAlso available in a colorized version.
- ConexionesEdited into Déjà-vu (2000)
Reseña destacada
Fans of film noir should see this one, as this film is up there with the best.
It's a story about how a simple act can lead to disaster in this case, death. If you've not seen it, I'm not about to tell you much except this: it has perhaps the most imaginative beginning for any murder mystery ever devised as Frank Bigelow (Edmond O'Brien) fronts up to the Homicide Bureau in Los Angeles to report a murder his own! Thereafter, the story traces Frank's attempts to find out who is trying to kill him, and why. One of the best pieces of irony is when, having learnt that he will die soon, Frank runs and runs until he's out of breath and stops, panting, beside a newsstand where there are multiple copies of Life magazine hanging there, just beside him. The director, Rudolph Mate, had a real insider joke with that shot.
And that long tracking shot, by the way, was an excellent example of how to use fast camera work and great editing.
On another level, the movie very much fits the times vis-à-vis the portrayal of evil and where it leads: retribution is always just around the corner for those who transgress society, even if you think you're justified. When you see this movie, you'll know what I mean.
And, for the times, the acting was good, with a standout performance from Edmond O'Brien, and ably supported by the ever-competent Luther Adler (as Majak, the sharp dealer in stolen goods), and Neville Brand, as the psychopathic Chester. The rest of the cast was adequate. The only jarring note (no pun intended) are the peculiar and bizarre wolf-whistles (inserted by some demented sound engineer?) that accompany Frank Bigelow as he looks at women in his hotel at San Francisco. What was the director thinking of...?
That aside, it's a good, fast-paced action mystery that helped to keep the film noir genre very much alive. Have a go...
It's a story about how a simple act can lead to disaster in this case, death. If you've not seen it, I'm not about to tell you much except this: it has perhaps the most imaginative beginning for any murder mystery ever devised as Frank Bigelow (Edmond O'Brien) fronts up to the Homicide Bureau in Los Angeles to report a murder his own! Thereafter, the story traces Frank's attempts to find out who is trying to kill him, and why. One of the best pieces of irony is when, having learnt that he will die soon, Frank runs and runs until he's out of breath and stops, panting, beside a newsstand where there are multiple copies of Life magazine hanging there, just beside him. The director, Rudolph Mate, had a real insider joke with that shot.
And that long tracking shot, by the way, was an excellent example of how to use fast camera work and great editing.
On another level, the movie very much fits the times vis-à-vis the portrayal of evil and where it leads: retribution is always just around the corner for those who transgress society, even if you think you're justified. When you see this movie, you'll know what I mean.
And, for the times, the acting was good, with a standout performance from Edmond O'Brien, and ably supported by the ever-competent Luther Adler (as Majak, the sharp dealer in stolen goods), and Neville Brand, as the psychopathic Chester. The rest of the cast was adequate. The only jarring note (no pun intended) are the peculiar and bizarre wolf-whistles (inserted by some demented sound engineer?) that accompany Frank Bigelow as he looks at women in his hotel at San Francisco. What was the director thinking of...?
That aside, it's a good, fast-paced action mystery that helped to keep the film noir genre very much alive. Have a go...
- RJBurke1942
- 21 sept 2006
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is D.O.A.?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Duración1 hora 23 minutos
- Color
- Relación de aspecto
- 1.37 : 1
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Con las horas contadas (1949) officially released in India in English?
Responde