Tenemos que hablar de AI (inteligencia artificial)
Título original: We Need to Talk About A.I.
PUNTUACIÓN EN IMDb
6,5/10
391
TU PUNTUACIÓN
Añade un argumento en tu idiomaA new film from acclaimed director, Leanne Pooley.A new film from acclaimed director, Leanne Pooley.A new film from acclaimed director, Leanne Pooley.
Imágenes
Max Tegmark
- Self - Astrophysicist
- (as Prof. Max Tegmark)
- …
Rodney Brooks
- Self - Robotics, M.I.T.
- (as Emeritus Prof. Rodney Brooks)
Louis Rosenberg
- Self - CEO & Chief Scientist, Unanimous A.I.
- (as Dr. Louis Rosenberg)
Stuart J. Russell
- Self
- (as Stuart Russell)
Mary Cummings
- Self - Humans & Autonomy Lab, Duke University
- (as Dr. Mary Cummings)
Oren Etzioni
- Self - CEO, Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence
- (as Dr. Oren Etzioni)
Argumento
Reseña destacada
I think the film is great! I've recommended to my friends and colleagues in IT to watch it as soon as they get a chance. I think currently in society the risks of AI (more specifically Artifical General Intelligence and Artificial Super Intelligence) are not understood by most people, even most IT and AI researchers, as the main focus (and main budgets) goes to ANI (narrow AI) that already makes is way into our society and has a lot of (potential) benefits in various fields including medicine (e.g. diagnosis of cancer, fighting pandemics), logistics, climate control, sustainability, etc.
It's brilliant that in this film Keir Dullea looks back on "2001" and his interactions with HAL. For most people outside the field of AI, HAL is still the most recognizable superintelligent AI computer. The documentary gives a very nice overview of the different stakeholders and views in the current AGI pro/con discussions (benefits of AI, robotics, warfare, existential risks for humanity, is it controllable or not?). Especially Bryan Johnson's quote ("What is our plan as a species? ... We don't have a plan and we don't realize it's necessary to have a plan.") keeps coming back to my mind. I think that's exactly the issue. Almost anyone in the field of AI (even more cautious people like Stuart Russell or Max Tegmark) assumes that AGI will soon be there (within the next 10 to 50 years). And many researches agree that there are very serious risks (including the existential risk) that come with this. However, when they talk about mitigation of these risks, the discussions become more unclear, e.g. Stuart Russell's suggestion of "Provable Benevolent AI", or Ben Goertzel's ideas on "decentralized AI". To me this doesn't make sense; we should first have a plan that proves the fundamental risks are mitigated before we move on. Or else put the AGI research on hold (if this is still possible...) like we did with genetic manipulation and cloning.
It's brilliant that in this film Keir Dullea looks back on "2001" and his interactions with HAL. For most people outside the field of AI, HAL is still the most recognizable superintelligent AI computer. The documentary gives a very nice overview of the different stakeholders and views in the current AGI pro/con discussions (benefits of AI, robotics, warfare, existential risks for humanity, is it controllable or not?). Especially Bryan Johnson's quote ("What is our plan as a species? ... We don't have a plan and we don't realize it's necessary to have a plan.") keeps coming back to my mind. I think that's exactly the issue. Almost anyone in the field of AI (even more cautious people like Stuart Russell or Max Tegmark) assumes that AGI will soon be there (within the next 10 to 50 years). And many researches agree that there are very serious risks (including the existential risk) that come with this. However, when they talk about mitigation of these risks, the discussions become more unclear, e.g. Stuart Russell's suggestion of "Provable Benevolent AI", or Ben Goertzel's ideas on "decentralized AI". To me this doesn't make sense; we should first have a plan that proves the fundamental risks are mitigated before we move on. Or else put the AGI research on hold (if this is still possible...) like we did with genetic manipulation and cloning.
- jfonteijn
- 1 jun 2020
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Inicia sesión para calificar y añadir a tu lista para recibir recomendaciones personalizadas
- How long is We Need to Talk About A.I.?Con tecnología de Alexa
Detalles
- Duración1 hora 26 minutos
Contribuir a esta página
Sugerir un cambio o añadir el contenido que falta
Principal laguna de datos
By what name was Tenemos que hablar de AI (inteligencia artificial) (2020) officially released in India in English?
Responde