Añade un argumento en tu idiomaJudge Clarence Thomas' nomination to the United States Supreme Court is called into question when Anita Hill, a former colleague, testifies that he sexually harassed her.Judge Clarence Thomas' nomination to the United States Supreme Court is called into question when Anita Hill, a former colleague, testifies that he sexually harassed her.Judge Clarence Thomas' nomination to the United States Supreme Court is called into question when Anita Hill, a former colleague, testifies that he sexually harassed her.
- Nominado para 2 premios Primetime Emmy
- 3 premios y 19 nominaciones en total
Argumento
¿Sabías que...?
- CuriosidadesWhile filming this movie, Kerry Washington was still a regular on the TV show Scandal, on which she plays a political "fixer" modeled on the real-life self-dubbed "crisis management expert" Judy Smith. Smith is depicted as a character (played by Kristen Ariza) in this movie; during the era depicted in Confirmation, Smith was the G. H. W. Bush administration's White House Deputy Press Secretary and played a large role in countering Anita Hill's claims of sexual harassment against Clarence Thomas in the media.
- Pifias@ about 1:36 Greg Kinnear, playing right-handed Joe Biden signs a document with his left hand.
- Citas
Anita Hill: Why are you doing this?
Charles Ogletree: I've got students more qualified than Thomas. Plus, I believe you.
Anita Hill: What about tenure?
Charles Ogletree: Hell, in 24 hours, I'll be able to get any job I want. Fuck tenure.
Good cast, but Kerry Washington was reason the film to shine. Her performance reminded me Julianne Moore as Sarah Palin from 'Game Change'. She won the Emmy Awards for that and now I believe Kerry Washington has a chance to do the same. Apart from her, the story did not look good. It opened so well, followed by strong middle part and then the last act last its charm quickly. Because it was all about one alleging against another and he keeps rejecting them, but that twist I expected never came or its powerful dialogues. Even though it was beautifully made.
The reason the movie staying neutral is might be the actual result of the trial. So they kept balancing the contents throughout the narration, yet the as the viewers, we can understand the guilty feelings from the suspect's face. That's how the film silently gives its own verdict regarding whatever the real one was. One of the best television film, but due to its weak conclusion, the people are dissatisfied. Still, it is a good watch, if you are interested in politics to learn how ugly and at a same time how silly it is.
7/10
- Reno-Rangan
- 3 sept 2016
- Enlace permanente
Selecciones populares
Detalles
- Fecha de lanzamiento
- País de origen
- Idioma
- Títulos en diferentes países
- 關鍵判決
- Localizaciones del rodaje
- Atlanta, Georgia, Estados Unidos(Not known at this time.)
- Empresas productoras
- Ver más compañías en los créditos en IMDbPro
- Duración1 hora 50 minutos
- Color
- Mezcla de sonido
- Relación de aspecto
- 16:9 HD