Ein Priester wird ermordet. Ein Übel breitet sich aus. Die Fortsetzung des Welterfolgs folgt Schwester Irene, die sich erneut mit Valak, der dämonischen Nonne, auseinandersetzen muss.Ein Priester wird ermordet. Ein Übel breitet sich aus. Die Fortsetzung des Welterfolgs folgt Schwester Irene, die sich erneut mit Valak, der dämonischen Nonne, auseinandersetzen muss.Ein Priester wird ermordet. Ein Übel breitet sich aus. Die Fortsetzung des Welterfolgs folgt Schwester Irene, die sich erneut mit Valak, der dämonischen Nonne, auseinandersetzen muss.
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Gewinn & 12 Nominierungen insgesamt
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesThe movie was filmed at an actual abandoned church in France.
- Patzer(at around 1h 9 mins) The painting of the nun is the same Patrick Wilson painted in Conjuring 2 (2016), which is set in 1977, years after the events in this movie.
- Crazy CreditsThere's a mid-credits scene.
- SoundtracksMoonlight Serenade
Written by Glenn Miller and Mitchell Parish
Performed by Mark 'Dr. SaxLove' Maxwell
Courtesy of Mark Maxwell Music
Ausgewählte Rezension
So, I was actually quite looking forward to this one. I wasn't expecting much from the original since sequels, prequel's and spinoffs often times are not up to par with their predecessors. However, I was quite pleasantly surprised with the first Nun and still think that it is a wildly underrated horror. So, after viewing this one, I must say that I was pretty disappointed. It was not a bad film by any means, but it did not live up to the quality of the first one and really landed in a very mediocre place.
It had a quick start and didn't waste any time, throwing us into the action. Yet, even then, I stopped and thought "well, that could've been cooler ". This same sentiment persisted throughout the majority of the film. It gave us some fun and creepiness, but then proceeded to move at a snails pace for quite some time. It felt like we were about 45 minutes in until I got any semblance of a real story line or something particularly intriguing. It really felt like they were going through the motions, an outline for a horror movie. As if they were following a map with very similar chain of events as the original.
It is no secret that this franchise loves a jump scare. The first one was full of them, however, it was also balanced out by genuinely creepy and cool effects with a general effective spook factor. This one had a bit of that, but was mostly just riddled with cheap, unnecessary and superfluous jump scares. Even most of the kills, while still entertaining, were pretty basic. At the same time there were also some effective imagery especially in the third act, some gnarly effects, and some pretty awesome stunts that stuck out.
I think my biggest issue with this is that the first one felt very deliberate and purposeful in many ways. It felt planned out and detailed... whereas this one felt like it was thrown together with the very bare minimum they could get away with as far as storyline went. Again, not a bad film, but nowhere near the quality of the first one for me. Would recommend, but not vehemently.
(Also, what's up with all these fake reviews? Weird. Lol)
IG - howlingatthemoonreviews.
It had a quick start and didn't waste any time, throwing us into the action. Yet, even then, I stopped and thought "well, that could've been cooler ". This same sentiment persisted throughout the majority of the film. It gave us some fun and creepiness, but then proceeded to move at a snails pace for quite some time. It felt like we were about 45 minutes in until I got any semblance of a real story line or something particularly intriguing. It really felt like they were going through the motions, an outline for a horror movie. As if they were following a map with very similar chain of events as the original.
It is no secret that this franchise loves a jump scare. The first one was full of them, however, it was also balanced out by genuinely creepy and cool effects with a general effective spook factor. This one had a bit of that, but was mostly just riddled with cheap, unnecessary and superfluous jump scares. Even most of the kills, while still entertaining, were pretty basic. At the same time there were also some effective imagery especially in the third act, some gnarly effects, and some pretty awesome stunts that stuck out.
I think my biggest issue with this is that the first one felt very deliberate and purposeful in many ways. It felt planned out and detailed... whereas this one felt like it was thrown together with the very bare minimum they could get away with as far as storyline went. Again, not a bad film, but nowhere near the quality of the first one for me. Would recommend, but not vehemently.
(Also, what's up with all these fake reviews? Weird. Lol)
IG - howlingatthemoonreviews.
- Howling_at_the_Moon_Reviews
- 7. Sept. 2023
- Permalink
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is The Nun II?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- La Monja II
- Drehorte
- Couvent des Prêcheurs, Aix-en-Provence, Bouches-du-Rhône, Frankreich(boarding school interiors and cloister)
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 38.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 86.267.073 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 32.603.336 $
- 10. Sept. 2023
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 269.667.073 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 50 Minuten
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.39 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen