Lathe of Heaven

Fernsehfilm
2002
1 Std. 31 Min.

IMDb-BEWERTUNG

5,8/10

1056

IHRE BEWERTUNG

Lisa Bonet, James Caan, and Lukas Haas in Lathe of Heaven (2002)

trailer wiedergeben2:01

1 Video

4 Fotos

Sci-Fi

Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuIn a near future society, a man claims that his dreams physically change reality. His therapist is confused at first, but soon decides to use him for his own gain.In a near future society, a man claims that his dreams physically change reality. His therapist is confused at first, but soon decides to use him for his own gain.In a near future society, a man claims that his dreams physically change reality. His therapist is confused at first, but soon decides to use him for his own gain.

Regie
- Philip Haas
Drehbuch
- Ursula K. Le Guin
- Alan Sharp
Hauptbesetzung

Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro

IMDb-BEWERTUNG

5,8/10

1056

IHRE BEWERTUNG

Regie
- Philip Haas
Drehbuch
- Ursula K. Le Guin
- Alan Sharp
Hauptbesetzung

Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro

Auszeichnungen
- 1 Nominierung insgesamt

Videos1

Trailer 2:01

Lathe of Heaven

Fotos

Handlung

Ändern

WUSSTEST DU SCHON:

Ändern

Wissenswertes
Because of the premise of the movie, it can be seen as either a remake of The Lathe of Heaven (1980), or its sequel.

Verbindungen
Referenced in Pulp Today: Be Careful What You Wish For: The Lathe of Heaven (2022)

Benutzerrezensionen58

Rezension

Ausgewählte Rezension

A Very Poor Effort

Let me add my voice to the chorus of naysayers. The A&E remake of "Lathe of Heaven" is a very poor effort. The original PBS production in which novelist Ursula Le Guin participated created awe and scope with a tiny budget. It used clever filmmaking techniques to tell a complex story efficiently. The A&E remake is slow, unremarkable and tediously confined to just a few well appointed sets. Much of the story is reduced to dull exposition. Worst of all, James Caan fails to produce the menace needed to create any suspense. Let's hope the remake of "Solaris" due in late 2002 fares better.