IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,7/10
5172
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Drei Marihuana-Farmer müssen mit ansehen, wie ihr Chef ermordet wird, was ihre friedliche Existenz in Nordwestkalifornien beendet. Sie beschließen, die Ernte selbst zu ernten, zu verarbeiten... Alles lesenDrei Marihuana-Farmer müssen mit ansehen, wie ihr Chef ermordet wird, was ihre friedliche Existenz in Nordwestkalifornien beendet. Sie beschließen, die Ernte selbst zu ernten, zu verarbeiten und zu verkaufen.Drei Marihuana-Farmer müssen mit ansehen, wie ihr Chef ermordet wird, was ihre friedliche Existenz in Nordwestkalifornien beendet. Sie beschließen, die Ernte selbst zu ernten, zu verarbeiten und zu verkaufen.
Michelle C. Bonilla
- Nurse
- (as Michelle Bonilla)
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesJamie Lee Curtis is the godmother of Jake Gyllenhaal and Maggie Gyllenhaal and friends with their father, Stephen Gyllenhaal.
- PatzerAfter an establishing shot that shows Jack Marsden driving into San Francisco via the Golden Gate Bridge, the close-up of him in the BMW shows he's traveling on a different bridge - one that's constructed of gray metal trusses and girders, rather than the famous red-orange of the Golden Gate Bridge.
- VerbindungenReferences Fantasy Island (1977)
- SoundtracksDevil's Train
Written by Brent Daniels & Daniel Lenz
Performed by Hednoize
Courtesy of Wax Trax!/TVT Records
Ausgewählte Rezension
Well, it's a weird movie. That Stephen Gyllenhaal seems to LIKE weirdness, really.
The fact that the film is billed as a comedy should not be considered an indictment. A film is made because someone decided to try to share this particular story with you--NOT because he wanted to add another movie to some given drawer/shelf in a video rental store, nor because he wanted to make things easy for the marketing department.
I know the film wasn't well-promoted, but looking at the movie itself, I think it's actually a pretty innovative piece of work.
What really makes the film work is the ambiguity and (ok, I admit it) PARANOIA of it.
If you've found yourself wondering what any particular scene adds to this movie, I fear you've fallen victim to lack of imagination. The characters never know "who knows what," and that is the single most essential premise of the movie. The film uses a far stronger perspective of first-person perspective than such bubble-gum fare as the Matrix. When the hapless dope-growers meet the first distributor they're looking to do business with, they don't know whether he's "in on everything." When BB Thornton talks to Sienna, he has no idea what SHE knows about the situation...and in fact, no matter how you choose to interpret that particular scene, you really ought to acknowledge that perhaps the "reality" (cinematically speaking) is the complete opposite of what you first thought when you watched it. Almost every meaningful dramatic scene in the film is completely ambiguous in possible interpretation. At least up until the climax.
This is a film that truly does get better with repeated viewings, IF you have the patience for a movie that doesn't spell everything out for you. If you want a heavy musical score and a didactic moral "point," stick with Spielberg. He'll never disappoint. If you want to WONDER what the characters are really up to in a film, check this one out.
The cast is terrific, the story is novel if not earthshaking, and the polish and presentation are first-rate. It has a few minor editorial flaws--I could've done without Lithgow's late appearance, or some of the "feel-good" moments laced into the script early on, but I certainly don't think someone else would have done a better job with the concept and script...unless Kubrick or Fassbinder were still alive.
8.5 out of 10.
The fact that the film is billed as a comedy should not be considered an indictment. A film is made because someone decided to try to share this particular story with you--NOT because he wanted to add another movie to some given drawer/shelf in a video rental store, nor because he wanted to make things easy for the marketing department.
I know the film wasn't well-promoted, but looking at the movie itself, I think it's actually a pretty innovative piece of work.
What really makes the film work is the ambiguity and (ok, I admit it) PARANOIA of it.
If you've found yourself wondering what any particular scene adds to this movie, I fear you've fallen victim to lack of imagination. The characters never know "who knows what," and that is the single most essential premise of the movie. The film uses a far stronger perspective of first-person perspective than such bubble-gum fare as the Matrix. When the hapless dope-growers meet the first distributor they're looking to do business with, they don't know whether he's "in on everything." When BB Thornton talks to Sienna, he has no idea what SHE knows about the situation...and in fact, no matter how you choose to interpret that particular scene, you really ought to acknowledge that perhaps the "reality" (cinematically speaking) is the complete opposite of what you first thought when you watched it. Almost every meaningful dramatic scene in the film is completely ambiguous in possible interpretation. At least up until the climax.
This is a film that truly does get better with repeated viewings, IF you have the patience for a movie that doesn't spell everything out for you. If you want a heavy musical score and a didactic moral "point," stick with Spielberg. He'll never disappoint. If you want to WONDER what the characters are really up to in a film, check this one out.
The cast is terrific, the story is novel if not earthshaking, and the polish and presentation are first-rate. It has a few minor editorial flaws--I could've done without Lithgow's late appearance, or some of the "feel-good" moments laced into the script early on, but I certainly don't think someone else would have done a better job with the concept and script...unless Kubrick or Fassbinder were still alive.
8.5 out of 10.
- roscopekoe
- 17. Juni 2004
- Permalink
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Homegrown?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 77.910 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 77.910 $
- 19. Apr. 1998
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 77.910 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 42 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was Grasalarm - Homegrown (1998) officially released in India in English?
Antwort