IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,8/10
5176
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Davids Frau starb vor 2 Jahren. Seine jugendliche Tochter Rachel, ihre süße Freundin und 2 Schwiegereltern versuchen, ihn mit einer Freundin zu verkuppeln.Davids Frau starb vor 2 Jahren. Seine jugendliche Tochter Rachel, ihre süße Freundin und 2 Schwiegereltern versuchen, ihn mit einer Freundin zu verkuppeln.Davids Frau starb vor 2 Jahren. Seine jugendliche Tochter Rachel, ihre süße Freundin und 2 Schwiegereltern versuchen, ihn mit einer Freundin zu verkuppeln.
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 wins total
Lorielle New
- Blonde on the Beach
- (as Lori New)
Matt Mosher
- Lifeguard
- (Nicht genannt)
J Schaefer
- Beach voter
- (Nicht genannt)
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesProducer David E. Kelley and star Michelle Pfeiffer have been married in real-life since 1993.
- Zitate
Esther Wheeler: He will be all right. It's just, he really loved her.
- Alternative VersionenA beach scene was re-shot with Clare Danes in a much less revealing thong bikini. The safer version can still be found on some prints.
- SoundtracksAfter The Loving
Written by Alan Bernstein and Ritchie Adams
Performed by Engelbert Humperdinck
Courtesy of Chrysalis Copyrights Limited
By arrangement eith Celebrity Licensing Inc.
Ausgewählte Rezension
This is one of the worst play-to-film adaptations I've ever seen. Of course, that's because it's a terrible hack job of one of my favorite stage plays, so I'm biased.
It does my heart good to see David E. Kelley completely bombing out every time he tries to make a feature film. The guy is so overrated (in my opinion.) And he really, REALLY blew it with this movie, considering how excellent, how genuinely moving the source material is.
When I went to see the film (with well-founded trepidation), I noticed that the only laughs generated out of the dialogue were for jokes that are found in the original play. Unfortunately, Kelley has done great violence to the original story in his filmic massacre...I mean "adaptation"...and the movie falls flat, flat, flat. It utterly misses the deeper points of the stage drama.
In fact, except for the basics of plot, it barely resembles the award-winning play at all. Esther, instead of being a professional psychologist, becomes in the movie version a busybody nag who has taken a couple of psychology classes, which somehow qualifies her to analyze the main character David. Pretty lame.
David E. Kelley (not the main character, thank God), in his infinite wisdom, turns Cindy into a horny little slut who tries to seduce Paul, instead of keeping her the teenage girl next door who has the sweet, and somehow sad, schoolgirl crush on David. Gillian's depth and complexity of character completely disappears. In the film she's merely an ethereal beauty who hangs around to inanely chat with David. The point of the play is that she's both saint and sinner -- something Esther wants David to remember, before he idealizes her into a fantasy that drives him literally crazy.
Ugh! I could go on, but it will simply make me angrier and angrier. This movie stinks. Read the play. It's only a hundred thousand times better than the movie, that's all.
It does my heart good to see David E. Kelley completely bombing out every time he tries to make a feature film. The guy is so overrated (in my opinion.) And he really, REALLY blew it with this movie, considering how excellent, how genuinely moving the source material is.
When I went to see the film (with well-founded trepidation), I noticed that the only laughs generated out of the dialogue were for jokes that are found in the original play. Unfortunately, Kelley has done great violence to the original story in his filmic massacre...I mean "adaptation"...and the movie falls flat, flat, flat. It utterly misses the deeper points of the stage drama.
In fact, except for the basics of plot, it barely resembles the award-winning play at all. Esther, instead of being a professional psychologist, becomes in the movie version a busybody nag who has taken a couple of psychology classes, which somehow qualifies her to analyze the main character David. Pretty lame.
David E. Kelley (not the main character, thank God), in his infinite wisdom, turns Cindy into a horny little slut who tries to seduce Paul, instead of keeping her the teenage girl next door who has the sweet, and somehow sad, schoolgirl crush on David. Gillian's depth and complexity of character completely disappears. In the film she's merely an ethereal beauty who hangs around to inanely chat with David. The point of the play is that she's both saint and sinner -- something Esther wants David to remember, before he idealizes her into a fantasy that drives him literally crazy.
Ugh! I could go on, but it will simply make me angrier and angrier. This movie stinks. Read the play. It's only a hundred thousand times better than the movie, that's all.
- WonderBroad
- 30. Nov. 2002
- Permalink
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is To Gillian on Her 37th Birthday?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- To Gillian on Her 37th Birthday
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 4.189.233 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 77.725 $
- 20. Okt. 1996
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 4.189.233 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 33 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen