IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,5/10
1142
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA medical student becomes obsessed with his faithless lover.A medical student becomes obsessed with his faithless lover.A medical student becomes obsessed with his faithless lover.
- Nominiert für 1 BAFTA Award
- 2 Nominierungen insgesamt
Anthony Booth
- Martin
- (Nicht genannt)
Terry Clinton
- Barmaid
- (Nicht genannt)
May Cluskey
- Sister
- (Nicht genannt)
Martin Crosbie
- Lab Technician
- (Nicht genannt)
Alex Dignam
- Student
- (Nicht genannt)
Michael Doolan
- Boy With Club Foot
- (Nicht genannt)
Bryan Forbes
- Medical Student
- (Nicht genannt)
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesThis was something of a catastrophe for MGM. Filming began early in 1963, but Henry Hathaway resigned as director and Bryan Forbes, who had a prominent supporting role, did a week of directing before also leaving the film. He tried without success to have his credit as writer of the screenplay removed and was replaced as an actor by Jack Hedley. (However, Forbes can be glimpsed, more or less as an extra, in one or two scenes.) Ken Hughes finished the film and reportedly had a very bad time; the film was many months in the editing rooms and was not seen until late in 1964, nearly a year after its scheduled release date. It ran for only 99 minutes - a surprise, as the novel is about 800 pages. It was a commercial and critical disaster, being released in the UK on the lower half of a double-bill. It has only infrequently been seen since, even on TV.
- Zitate
Nora Nesbitt: You're well out of it.
Philip Carey: Out of what?
Nora Nesbitt: Whatever you came here to forget.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Hollywood and the Stars: In Search of Kim Novak (1964)
Ausgewählte Rezension
Not-bad third version of W. Somerset Maugham's depressing story about a sluttish waitress in London and the sensitive future doctor who becomes obsessed with her. Ravaged by critics upon its release (and thought bannable for a time for Kim Novak's suggestive scenes), this remake isn't a classic, nor does it improve on the Bette Davis version, but it does have something. Novak is just fine; Laurence Harvey also good as the smitten medico. The biggest problem is the screenplay's faithfulness to Maugham's plot, which by 1964 standards was pretty creaky. Why couldn't they have updated it just a bit? For all the talk about this version being "too shocking", the movie disappoints by not shocking at all, by playing it too safe. A soap opera, to be sure, though a handsome and interesting one. Novak-diehards will love the film, and her. **1/2 from ****
- moonspinner55
- 1. Okt. 2001
- Permalink
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- W. Somerset Maugham's of Human Bondage
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 3.815.000 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 40 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was Der Menschen Hörigkeit (1964) officially released in India in English?
Antwort