Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuThree apparent murders and a pair of imposters disrupt the lives of an engaged couple.Three apparent murders and a pair of imposters disrupt the lives of an engaged couple.Three apparent murders and a pair of imposters disrupt the lives of an engaged couple.
Richard 'Skeets' Gallagher
- Wally Richards
- (as 'Skeets' Gallagher)
Jonathan Hale
- Captain Hobart Nelson
- (as John Hale)
Edith Craig
- Florist Clerk
- (Nicht genannt)
Jack Gargan
- Bellhop Delivering Flowers
- (Nicht genannt)
Sydney Jarvis
- Police Desk Sergeant
- (Nicht genannt)
Donald Kerr
- Captain Nelson's Aide
- (Nicht genannt)
Walter Long
- Policeman
- (Nicht genannt)
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesCapt. Nelson (Jonathan Hale) and his daughter Judy (Thelma Todd) are driven in a 1930 Cadillac Series 452 Sports Phaeton.
- PatzerAt about 0:23:00, after Aunt Jane sniffs the flowers the shadow of the boom mic appears on the wall.
- Zitate
Judith 'Judy' Nelson: I wanted a husband with the virtues of a lover, not a lover with the vices of a husband.
- VerbindungenReferenced in Max Steiner: Maestro of Movie Music (2019)
Ausgewählte Rezension
I wasn't super-motivated to write a review on this one, but after coming here and seeing the ridiculous negativity, I decided to voice my dissent.
Plot In a Nutshell: A man and his pal try to rid themselves of two scammers while dealing with a ditzy housemaid, a nosy aunt, bumbling cops, a dogged reporter and a crazed butler, and at the same, trying to create a semblance of normalcy for when his fiancée and her father arrive. Good luck!
That sounds screwball, doesn't it? And it sure delivers on that score. One reviewer wrote that the film was confusing. I wasn't confused in the least. I found it very easy to follow. Someone else wrote that it doesn't make sense. It made sense to me. The only part one might argue is why the butler stuck around. But it was established at the end that the butler was clearly unbalanced, so you can't really apply logic to his decisions, can you?
I only watched this film because I recently read a book about the mysterious circumstances of Thelma Todd's premature death in the 1930s. So I try to check out any of her films I come across. And this turned out to be a pleasant surprise. It's barely over an hour, so it doesn't wear out its welcome. The two male leads have an engaging chemistry that makes their friendship believable. The plot, although clearly a bit silly, is also clearly meant to be that way. And there were several scenes that made me laugh so hard I had to rewind and watch them again!
All in all, I enjoyed this film thoroughly and did not at all find it a waste of my time.
8/10. Would I watch again (Y/N)?: Yes, absolutely.
Plot In a Nutshell: A man and his pal try to rid themselves of two scammers while dealing with a ditzy housemaid, a nosy aunt, bumbling cops, a dogged reporter and a crazed butler, and at the same, trying to create a semblance of normalcy for when his fiancée and her father arrive. Good luck!
That sounds screwball, doesn't it? And it sure delivers on that score. One reviewer wrote that the film was confusing. I wasn't confused in the least. I found it very easy to follow. Someone else wrote that it doesn't make sense. It made sense to me. The only part one might argue is why the butler stuck around. But it was established at the end that the butler was clearly unbalanced, so you can't really apply logic to his decisions, can you?
I only watched this film because I recently read a book about the mysterious circumstances of Thelma Todd's premature death in the 1930s. So I try to check out any of her films I come across. And this turned out to be a pleasant surprise. It's barely over an hour, so it doesn't wear out its welcome. The two male leads have an engaging chemistry that makes their friendship believable. The plot, although clearly a bit silly, is also clearly meant to be that way. And there were several scenes that made me laugh so hard I had to rewind and watch them again!
All in all, I enjoyed this film thoroughly and did not at all find it a waste of my time.
8/10. Would I watch again (Y/N)?: Yes, absolutely.
- Better_Sith_Than_Sorry
- 1. Apr. 2024
- Permalink
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 3 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.37 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was Lightning Strikes Twice (1934) officially released in Canada in English?
Antwort