IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,6/10
5174
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Kiewer Rus, Ende des 10. Jahrhunderts. Nach dem Tod seines Vaters wird der junge Wikingerprinz Wladimir von Nowgorod ins Exil über das gefrorene Meer gezwungen.Kiewer Rus, Ende des 10. Jahrhunderts. Nach dem Tod seines Vaters wird der junge Wikingerprinz Wladimir von Nowgorod ins Exil über das gefrorene Meer gezwungen.Kiewer Rus, Ende des 10. Jahrhunderts. Nach dem Tod seines Vaters wird der junge Wikingerprinz Wladimir von Nowgorod ins Exil über das gefrorene Meer gezwungen.
- Auszeichnungen
- 3 Gewinne & 6 Nominierungen insgesamt
Harald Thompson Rosenstrøm
- Eynar
- (as Harald Rosenstrøm)
Handlung
WUSSTEST DU SCHON:
- WissenswertesThe Pecheneg language, an extinct Turkic language once spoken in Eastern Europe in the 7th-12th centuries, was "re-invented" for the movie.
- PatzerThe movie shows that Czar Vladimir I brought the Christianity to the people of the Rus. However Christianity already existed and was practiced before Vladimir's rule (during the years 978-1015), e.g. Princess Olga of Kiev (920-969), wife of Igor the Rurik, was one of the first Russian rulers who officially was a Christian.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Lost in Adaptation: Eragon (2016)
Ausgewählte Rezension
It is always difficult to make a movie based on historical facts. One must do a thorough research and properly put those facts in the movie. But one should also try to make that movie interesting and entertaining. Otherwise you'll get a protracted documentary.
First of all, the title has almost nothing to do with the story. The story indeed follows the historical facts, but is told in such a messy way, full of illogical, irrational and unjustifiable events and decisions that it is tiresome to watch. You will find illogicality and complete idiocy even during the fight scenes. Moreover, this movie has no specific plot, no higher agenda and no epic moments, which all makes it difficult for the spectators to connect with the story.
The story is practically about just one person and I kept wondering why it is so. Throughout the whole movie, the main character is completely and utterly useless, failing each and every challenge in front of him. Call it a paradox, but he somehow managed to fail even when he was winning. I wonder if director's decision was to purposely make this character so weak and clumsy. If it was, it's a bad decision because no one wants to watch a 2-hour movie where the main protagonist is a weakling and an idiot. If it wasn't, then the director has totally failed at his creation. I didn't "see" the main character. I didn't believe in him for one moment. He is not strong, he is not smart, he is not a great warrior, and not a great leader. So why is he the main character?
I do not blame any of the actors, they really did their best. I blame the writers and the producers for ruining the potential this story had. Thus, I do not recommend this movie, there are far better ways to spend your time than watching this nonsense.
First of all, the title has almost nothing to do with the story. The story indeed follows the historical facts, but is told in such a messy way, full of illogical, irrational and unjustifiable events and decisions that it is tiresome to watch. You will find illogicality and complete idiocy even during the fight scenes. Moreover, this movie has no specific plot, no higher agenda and no epic moments, which all makes it difficult for the spectators to connect with the story.
The story is practically about just one person and I kept wondering why it is so. Throughout the whole movie, the main character is completely and utterly useless, failing each and every challenge in front of him. Call it a paradox, but he somehow managed to fail even when he was winning. I wonder if director's decision was to purposely make this character so weak and clumsy. If it was, it's a bad decision because no one wants to watch a 2-hour movie where the main protagonist is a weakling and an idiot. If it wasn't, then the director has totally failed at his creation. I didn't "see" the main character. I didn't believe in him for one moment. He is not strong, he is not smart, he is not a great warrior, and not a great leader. So why is he the main character?
I do not blame any of the actors, they really did their best. I blame the writers and the producers for ruining the potential this story had. Thus, I do not recommend this movie, there are far better ways to spend your time than watching this nonsense.
- dreenphlanger
- 14. Apr. 2017
- Permalink
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Viking?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 1.250.000.000 RUR (geschätzt)
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 29.161.298 $
- Laufzeit2 Stunden 22 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen