Castles and Warfare in the Middle Ages
()
About this ebook
A concise, scholarly reference for architectural historians, this absorbing history will appeal as well to medievalists, military buffs, and anyone interested in the evolution and development of the castle.
Read more from Eugène Emmanuel Viollet Le Duc
Annals of a Fortress (Barnes & Noble Digital Library) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Designs and Ornaments from the Chapels of Notre Dame Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to build a house: an architectural novelette Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnnals of a Fortress Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Castles and Warfare in the Middle Ages
Titles in the series (50)
The Battles that Changed History Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Principles of Maritime Strategy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMeyrick's Medieval Knights and Armour Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Soldiers and Uniforms of the American Army, 1775-1954 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBushido: Samurai Ethics and the Soul of Japan Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5London to Ladysmith & Ian Hamilton's March Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Annals of a Fortress: Twenty-two Centuries of Siege Warfare Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Book of the Sword: With 293 Illustrations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNapoleon's Military Maxims Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Baron Von Steuben's Revolutionary War Drill Manual: A Facsimile Reprint of the 1794 Edition Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Victory in Europe, 1945: The Last Offensive of World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5An Encyclopedia of Battles: Accounts of Over 1,560 Battles from 1479 B.C. to the Present Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Glossary of the Construction, Decoration and Use of Arms and Armor: in All Countries and in All Times Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Indian and Oriental Arms and Armour Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The History of Chivalry and Armour: With 60 Full-Color Plates Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Eavesdropping on Hell: Historical Guide to Western Communications Intelligence and the Holocaust, 1939-1945 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Instructions for His Generals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Chronicles of the Crusades Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5With Napoleon in Russia Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Dictionary of Espionage: Spyspeak into English Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Seven Firefights in Vietnam Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Essential Clausewitz: Selections from On War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Illustrated Art of War Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Castles and Warfare in the Middle Ages Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe American Sword 1775-1945 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Story of the Malakand Field Force Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Revised Regulations for the Army of the United States, 1861 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGuns on the Early Frontiers: From Colonial Times to the Years of the Western Fur Trade Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Related ebooks
Castle Builders: Approaches to Castle Design and Construction in the Middle Ages Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How To Attack A Castle - And How To Defend It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5English Castles Explained: Britain's Living History Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Medieval Castles of England and Wales Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Castles: Fortresses of Power Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCastle to Fortress: Medieval to Post-Modern Fortifications in the Lands of the Former Roman Empire Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe English Castle: An Account of Its Development as a Military Structure Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSieges Of The Middle Ages Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsForts: An illustrated history of building for defence Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Medieval Castles of Wales Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBattle Castles: 500 Years of Knights and Siege Warfare Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Medieval Warfare Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Greece and Rome at War Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Architecture (Gothic and Renaissance): Edited & Illustrated Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Medieval Siege and Siegecraft Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Building of England: How the History of England Has Shaped Our Buildings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Castles: Their Construction and History Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Sieges of the Middle Ages Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5English Churches Explained: Britain's Living History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Tudor Garden: 1485–1603 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Samurai Castles: History / Architecture / Visitors' Guides Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCastrum to Castle: Classical to Medieval Fortifications in the Lands of the Western Roman Empire Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Medieval Knight Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Medieval Arms and Armor: A Pictorial Archive Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Fortified Settlements in Early Medieval Europe: Defended Communities of the 8th-10th Centuries Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRomanesque Art Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Medieval Costume, Armour and Weapons Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War in the Middle Ages (378-1515): Military History of Medieval Europe from 4th to 16th Century Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Medieval Maritime Warfare Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Authentic Color Schemes for Victorian Houses: Comstock's Modern House Painting, 1883 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Wars & Military For You
Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Masters of the Air: America's Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resistance: The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Happiest Man on Earth: The Beautiful Life of an Auschwitz Survivor Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Dr. Seuss Goes to War: The World War II Editorial Cartoons of Theodor Seuss Geisel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Faithful Spy: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Plot to Kill Hitler Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mysterious Case of Rudolf Diesel: Genius, Power, and Deception on the Eve of World War I Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5They Thought They Were Free: The Germans, 1933–45 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wager Disaster: Mayem, Mutiny and Murder in the South Seas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of the Women Who Helped Win World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The History of the Peloponnesian War: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Plane in the Sky: An Oral History of 9/11 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Churchill's Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare: The Mavericks Who Plotted Hitler's Defeat Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Castles and Warfare in the Middle Ages
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Castles and Warfare in the Middle Ages - Eugène-Emmanuel Viollet-le-Duc
Bibliographical Note
This Dover edition, first published in 2005, is an unabridged republication of An Essay on the Military Architecture of the Middle Ages, originally published by J. H. and J. Parker, Oxford and London, 1860.
DOVER Pictorial Archive SERIES
This book belongs to the Dover Pictorial Archive Series. You may use the designs and illustrations for graphics and crafts applications, free and without special permission, provided that you include no more than ten in the same publication or project. (For permission for additional use, please write to Permissions Department, Dover Publications, Inc., 31 East 2nd Street, Mineola, N.Y. 11501.)
However, republication or reproduction of any illustration by any other graphic service, whether it be in a book or in any other design resource, is strictly prohibited.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Viollet-le-Duc, Eugène-Emmanuel, 1814-1879.
[Essai sur l’architecture militaire au Moyen-âge. English]
Castles and warfare in the Middle Ages / Eugene-Emmanuel Viollet-le-Duc ; translated from the French by M. Macdermott.
p. cm.
Originally published: An essay on the military architecture of the Middle Ages. Westport, Conn. : Greenwood Press, 1977.
Includes index.
9780486137575
1. Military architecture—Europe—History—To 1500. 2. Architecture, Medieval—Europe. 3. Fortification—Europe. 4. Castles—Europe. I. Viollet-le-Duc, Eugène-Emmanuel, 1814-1879. Essay on the military architecture of the Middle Ages. II. Title.
UG460.V6513 2004
725’.18—dc22
2004059325
Manufactured in the United States by Courier Corporation
44020602
www.doverpublications.com
ADVERTISEMENT.
THE work now offered to English readers has already attained an European reputation in its original language. The accomplished Author has thrown entirely new light on an interesting subject, and has brought to bear upon it not only the results of his great experience as an architect, but also shews a thorough knowledge of the principles of engineering, and great research as an antiquary. The remains of our ancient castles will no longer be considered merely as picturesque ruins, but as objects of careful study, worthy of minute examination in order to discover not only the age when each part was built, but also the special purpose for which it was built with a view to the defence of the castle or town. That part of the work which relates to the hoarding, or wooden constructions to assist in the defence of the castle, is entirely new, and explains many things which were previously quite incomprehensible. The Author pays a just tribute to the memory of Richard Cœur-de-Lion, as not only a brave warrior, but also an accomplished engineer, in advance of his age, shewing great ability and skill in the construction of the Château-Gaillard ; and this portion of the work cannot fail to be interesting to English readers. It also affords another instance of the valuable assistance which a knowledge of Medieval Architecture is calculated to render to History. A great deal of medieval history is hardly intelligible without it, and the successive changes in the modes of warfare as developed in this work explain many important passages, especially in the wars between France and England. We now see some of the causes why the English were always successful at one period and the French at another.
The object of the Publishers in producing this translation is to continue their series of works on Medieval Architecture : they have already illustrated the Churches and the Houses of our ancestors, and the present work illustrates the Castles, with the modes of attacking and defending them. It is intended to follow this up with another volume specially devoted to the History of the Castles of England, which they at first thought of having incorporated with the present work, but found that it was hardly practicable to do so, and that the subject required separate treatment.
Table of Contents
Title Page
Copyright Page
ADVERTISEMENT.
Table of Figures
ESSAY ON THE MILITARY ARCHITECTURE OF THE MIDDLE AGES.
INDEX.
Table of Figures
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig 28
Fig 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39
Fig. 40
Fig. 41
Fig 42
Fig. 43
Fig. 44
Fig 45
Fig. 46
Fig 47
Fig. 48
Fig. 49
Fig. 50
Fig. 51
Fig. 52
Fig 53
Fig. 54
Fig. 55
Fig. 56
Fig. 57
Fig 58
Fig. 59
Fig. 60
Fig. 61
Fig. 62
Fig. 63
Fig. 64
Fig. 65
Fig. 66
Fig. 67
Fig. 68
Fig. 69
Fig. 70
Fig. 71
Fig. 72
Fig. 73
Fig. 74
Fig. 75
Fig. 76
Fig. 77
Fig. 78
Fig. 79
Fig. 80
Fig. 81
Fig. 82
Fig. 83
Fig. 84
Fig. 85
Fig. 86
Fig. 87
Fig. 88
Fig 89
Fig. 90
Fig. 91
Fig. 92
Fig. 93
Fig. 94
Fig. 95
Fig. 96
Fig. 97
Fig. 98
Fig. 99
Fig. 100
Fig. 101
Fig. 102
Fig. 103
Fig. 104
Fig. 105
Fig. 106
Fig. 107
Fig. 108
Fig. 109
Fig. 110
Fig. 111
Fig. 112
Fig. 113
Fig. 114
Fig. 115
Fig. 116
Fig. 117
Fig. 118
Fig. 119
Fig. 120
Fig. 121
Fig. 122
Fig. 123
Fig. 124
Fig. 125
Fig. 126
Fig. 127
Fig. 128
Fig. 129
Fig. 130
Fig. 131
Fig. 132
Fig. 133
Fig. 134
Fig. 135
Fig. 136
Fig. 137
Fig. 138
Fig. 139
Fig. 140
Fig. 141
Fig. 142
Fig. 143
Fig. 144
Fig. 145
Fig. 146
Fig. 147
Fig. 148
Figs. 149
Figs. 150
Fig. 151
ESSAY ON THE MILITARY ARCHITECTURE OF THE MIDDLE AGES.
TO write a general history of the art of fortification, from the days of antiquity to the present time, is one of the fine subjects lying open to the researches of archæologists, and one which we may reasonably hope to see undertaken; but we must admit that it is a subject, to treat which fully requires much and varied information, —since to the knowledge of the historian should be superadded in him who would undertake it the practice of the arts of architecture and military engineering. It is difficult to form an exact estimate of a forgotten art, when we are unacquainted with that art as it is practised in the present day; and in order that a work, of the nature of that which we wish to see undertaken, should be complete, it ought to be executed by one who is at once versed in the modern art of the defence of strong places, an architect, and an antiquary. The present writer is not a military engineer and scarcely an antiquary : it would, therefore, be in the highest degree presumptuous were he to offer this summary in any other light than as an essay,—a study of one phase of the art of fortification, comprised between the establishment of the feudal power, and the definite adoption of the modern system of fortification as devised to counteract the use of artillery. This essay, perhaps, by lifting the veil which still envelopes one branch of the art of mediæval architecture, may induce some of our young officers of engineers to devote themselves to a study, which could not fail to possess great interest, and which might probably have a useful and a practical result; for there is always something to be gained by informing ourselves of the efforts made by those who have preceded us in the same path, and by following up the progress of human labour, from its first rude essays, to the most remarkable developments of the intelligence and the genius of man. To see how others have conquered before us the difficulties by which they were surrounded, is one means of learning how to conquer those which every day present themselves; and in the art of fortification, where everything is a problem to be solved, where all is calculation and foresight, where we have not only to do battle with the elements and with the hand of time, as in the other branches of architecture, but to protect ourselves against the intelligent and previously-planned destructive agency of man, it is well, we think, to know how in past times some have applied all the abilities of their minds and all the material force at their command to the work of destruction, others to that of preservation.
At the time when the barbarians invaded Gaul, many of the towns still preserved their fortifications of Gallo-Roman origin ; those which did not, made haste to erect some, out of the ruins of civil buildings. Those walled enclosures, successively forced and repaired, were long the only defensive works of these cities; and it is probable that they were not built upon any regular or systematic plan, but constructed very variously, according to the nature of the localities and of the materials, or after certain local traditions, the nature of which we cannot at the present day fully understand, as there remain to us only the ruins of these walls, consisting of foundations which have been modified by successive additions.
The Visigoths took possession, in the fifth century, of a great portion of Gaul; their domination extended, under Wallia, from the Narbonaise to the Loire. During eighty-nine years Toulouse remained the capital of this kingdom, and, in the course of that period, the greater number of the towns of Septimania were fortified with great care, and had to stand several sieges. Narbonne, Béziers, Agde, Carcassonne, and Toulouse were surrounded by formidable ramparts, constructed according to the Roman traditions of the Lower Empire, if we may judge at least by the important portions of the early walls which still surround the city of Carcassonne. The Visigoths, allies of Rome, did no more than perpetuate the acts of the Empire, and that with some degree of success. As for the Franks, who had preserved their Germanic customs, their military establishments would naturally be so many fortified camps, surrounded by palisades, ditches, and some embankments of earth. Timber plays an important part in the fortifications of the first centuries of the middle ages. And although the Germanic races who occupied Gaul left the task of erecting churches and monasteries, palaces and civil structures, to the Gallo-Romans, they were bound to preserve their military habits in the presence of the conquered nation. The Romans themselves, when they made war upon territories covered with forest, like Germany and Gaul, frequently erected ramparts of wood; advanced works, as it were, beyond the limits of their camps; as we may see by the bas-relief on Trajan’s Column (1). In the time of Cæsar, the Celts, when they found themselves unable to continue their wars, placed their women, their children, and all the most precious of their possessions behind fortifications made of wood, earth, or stone, beyond the reach of their enemy’s attack.
They employ,
says Cæsar in his Commentaries, "pieces of wood perfectly straight, lay them on the ground in a direction parallel to each other at a distance apart of two feet, fix them transversely by means of trunks of trees, and fill up the voids with earth. On this first foundation they lay a layer of broken rock in large fragments, and when these are well cemented, they put down a fresh course of timber arranged like the first ; taking care that the timbers of these two courses do not come into contact, but rest upon the layer of rock which intervenes. The work is thus proceeded with, until it attains the height required. This kind of construction, by reason of the variety of its materials, composed of stone and wood, and forming a regular wall-surface, is good for the service and defence of fortified places; for the stones which are used therein hinder the wood from burning, and the trees being about forty feet in length, and bound together in the thickness of the wall, can be broken or torn asunder only with the greatest difficulty ¹."
Fig. 1. Wooden Ramparts of Roman work, from Trajan’s Column.
Cæsar renders justice to the industrious manner in which the Gallic tribes of his time established their defences and succeeded in resisting the efforts of their assailants, when he laid siege to the town of Avaricum, (Bourges).
The Gauls,
he says, "opposed all kinds of stratagems to the wonderful constancy of our soldiers: for the industry of that nation imitates perfectly whatever they have once seen done. They turned aside the hooks (falces murales) with nooses, and when they had caught hold of them firmly drew them in by means of engines, and undermined the mound the more skilfully for the reason that there are in their territories extensive iron-mines, and consequently every kind of mining operation is known and practised by them. They had furnished, moreover, the whole wall on every side with turrets, and had covered these with hides. Besides, in their frequent sallies by day and night they attempted either to set fire to the mound, or attack our soldiers when engaged in the works; and, moreover, by means of beams spliced together, in proportion as our towers were raised, together with our ramparts, did they raise theirs to the same level ²."
The Germans constructed, also, ramparts of wood crowned with parapets of osier. The Column of Antonine at Rome furnishes a curious example of this kind of rustic redoubt (2). These works were, however, very probably of hasty construction. We see here the fort attacked by Roman soldiers. The infantry, in order to get close to the rampart, cover themselves with their shields and form what was called the tortoise (testudo); by resting the tops of their shields against the rampart, they were able to sap its base or set fire to it, safe, comparatively, from the projectiles of the enemy ³. The besieged are in the act of flinging stones, wheels, swords, torches, and fire-pots upon the tortoise; while Roman soldiers, holding burning brands, appear to await the moment when the tortoise shall have completely reached the rampart, in order to pass under the shields and fire the fort. In their entrenched camps, the Romans, besides some advanced works constructed of timber, frequently erected along their ramparts, at regular intervals, wooden scaffoldings, which served either for placing in position the machines intended to hurl their projectiles, or as watchtowers from which to reconnoitre the approaches of the enemy. The bas-reliefs of Trajan’s Column afford numerous examples of this kind of structure (3). These Roman camps were of two sorts: there were the summer camps, the castra œstiva, of a purely temporary nature, which were raised to protect the army when halting in the course of the campaign, and which consisted merely of a shallow ditch and a row of palisades planted along the summit of a slight embankment; and the winter, or stationary camps, castra hiberna, castra stativa, which were defended by a wide and deep ditch, and by a rampart of sodded earth or of stone flanked by towers; the whole crowned with crenellated parapets or with stakes, connected together by means of transverse pieces of timber or wattles. The use of round and square towers by the Romans in their fixed entrenchments was general, for, as Vegetius says,—
Fig. 2. German Rampart of wood and wicker-work, from the Column of Antoninus.
The ancients found that the enclosure of a fortified place ought not to be in one continuous line, for the reason that the battering-rams would thus be able too easily to effect a breach; whereas by the use of towers placed sufficiently close to one another in the rampart, their walls presented parts projecting and re-entering. If the enemy wishes to plant his ladders against, or to bring his machines close to, a wall thus constructed, he can be seen in front, in flank, and almost in the rear; he is almost hemmed in by the fire from the batteries of the place he is attacking.
From the very earliest antiquity the usefulness of towers had been recognised for the purpose of taking the besiegers in flank when they attacked the curtains.
The fixed camps of the Romans were generally quadrangular, with four gates pierced, one in the centre of each of the fronts ; the principal gate was called the prœtorian, because it opened in front of the prœtorium, or residence of the general-in-chief ; the opposite one was called the decumana; the two lateral gates were known as principalis dextra and principalis sinistra. Outworks, called antemuralia, procastria, defended those gates ⁴. The officers and soldiers were lodged in huts built of clay, brick, or wood, and thatched or tiled over. The towers were provided with machines for hurling darts or stones. The local position very often modified this quadrangular arrangement, for, as Vitruvius justly observes, in reference to machines of war (cap. xxii.),— As for the means which a besieged force may employ in their defence, this cannot be set in writing.
Fig. 3. Wooden Towers on Roman Walls, from Trajan’s Column.
The military station of Famars, in Belgium (Fanum Martis), given in the History of Architecture in Belgium,
and the plan of which we here produce (4), shews an enclosure, of which the arrangement is not in accordance with the ordinary plans of Roman camps: it is true, this fortification cannot be referred to an earlier date than the third century ⁵. As for the mode adopted by the Romans in the construction of their fortifications for cities, it consisted in two strong walls of masonry, separated by an interval of twenty feet: the space between was filled with the earth from the ditches, and loose rock well rammed, forming at top a parapet walk, slightly inclined towards the town to allow the water to pass off : the outer of these two walls, which was raised above the parapet-walk, was massive and crenellated; the inner one was very slightly elevated above the ground level of the place inside, so as to render the ramparts easy of access, by means of flights of steps and inclined ways (5) ⁶.
Fig. 4. Plan of Famars, in Belgium.
Fig. 5. Roman Method of constructing the Walls of a Fortification.
The Chateau Narbonnais at Toulouse, which plays so important a part in the history of that city from the time of the domination of the Visigoths to the fourteenth century, appears to have been constructed according to the classical model: it was composed of—
"Two massive towers, one at the south, the other at the north, built of baked clay and flint, with lime; the whole enclosed by great stones without mortar, but cramped together by means of iron plates run with lead. The castle stood above the ground level more than thirty fathom (brasses) ⁷, having towards the south two successive gates and two vaults of masonry reaching to the summit of the building; there were also two other successive gates on the north side and on the Place du Salin. By the latter of these gates you formerly entered the city, the ground of which has been since raised more than twelve feet . . . A square tower was to be seen between these two towers, or defensive platforms; for they were embanked and filled with earth, according to Guillaume de Puilaurnes, since it appears that Simon de Montfort had all the earth removed which then filled them to their roofs ⁸."
The Visigoth fortification of the city of Carcassonne, which is still preserved, offers an analogous arrangement, recalling those described by Vegetius. The level of the town is much more elevated than the ground outside, and almost as high as the parapet walks. The curtain walls, of great thickness, are composed of two faces of small cubical masonry alternating with courses of brick; the middle portion being filled, not with earth, but with rubble run with lime. The towers were raised above these curtains, and their communication with the latter might be cut off, so as to make of each tower a small independent fort; externally, these towers are cylindrical, and, on the side of the town, square: they rest also, towards the country, upon a cubical base or foundation. We subjoin (6) the plan of one of these towers with the curtains adjoining.
Fig. 6. Plan of one of the