Medieval Warfare
4/5
()
About this ebook
Bob Carruthers
Bob Carruthers is an Emmy Award winning author and historian, who has written extensively on the Great War. A graduate of Edinburgh University, Bob is the author of a number of military history titles including the Amazon best seller The Wehrmacht in Russia.
Read more from Bob Carruthers
Handbook on German Military Forces Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHitler: A Life in Pictures: The Official Third Reich Publication Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe U-Boat War in the Atlantic, 1939–1941 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Anglo-Saxon Chronicle: Illustrated and Annotated Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Private Hitler's War, 1914–1918 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Der Adler: The Official Nazi Luftwaffe Magazine: The English Language Editions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Wolf Pack: The U-Boats at War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Official U-Boat Commanders Handbook: The Illustrated Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSS Grenadiers on The Russian Front Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The German Air Force I Knew 1914-1918: Memoirs of the Imperial German Air Force in the Great War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGerman Artillery in Combat Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Into the Gates of Hell: Stug Command '41: A Novel Based on a True Story of Combat on the Russian Front Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe U-Boat War in the Atlantic, 1944–1945 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGerman Tank Hunters: The Panzerjäger Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Panther V in Combat: Guderian's Problem Child Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The U-Boat War in the Atlantic, 1942–1943 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSturmgeschütze: Armoured Assault Guns Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Crimean War Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Tiger I: The Official Wartime Crew Manual Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVoices from the Luftwaffe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPanzer Rollen: The Logistics of a Panzer Division From Primary Sources Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Trench Warfare: Contemporary Combat Images from the Great War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTiger Command!: A Novel Based on a True Story of Combat on the Russian Front Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWalking Into Hell: The Somme Through British and German Eyes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCaesar's Conquest of Gaul: The Illustrated Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEastern Front: Encirclement and Escape by German Forces Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Ten Years at Hitler's Side: The Testimony of Wilhelm Keitel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPanzer III: Germany's Medium Tank Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Gestapo on Trial: Evidence from Nuremberg Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Medieval Warfare
Related ebooks
The Medieval Soldier Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Anglo-Saxons at War, 800–1066 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Medieval Maritime Warfare Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Forts: An illustrated history of building for defence Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How To Attack A Castle - And How To Defend It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Knights: Chivalry and Violence Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5God's Viking: Harald Hardrada: The Life and Times of the Last Great Viking Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVictory at Poitiers: The Black Prince and the Medieval Art of War Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Warfare in the Medieval World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mercenaries and Their Masters: Warfare in Renaissance Italy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Battles of the Dark Ages Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Norman Commanders: Masters of Warfare, 911–1135 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Armies of the Vikings, AD 793–1066: History, Organization and Equipment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Renaissance Warfare: From The Fall of Constantinople to the Thirty Years War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sieges of the Middle Ages Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Medieval Wars 500–1500 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Agincourt War: A Military History of the Hundred Years War from 1369 to 1453 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Medieval Military Combat: Battle Tactics and Fighting Techniques of the Wars of the Roses Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Sir John Hawkwood: Chivalry and the Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Military History of Late Rome, 284–361 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mercenaries in the Classical World: To the Death of Alexander Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Warfare in the Ancient World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Britain in the Age of Arthur: A Military History Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Siege Warfare during the Hundred Years War: Once More unto the Breach Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Armies of the Late Roman Empire, AD 284–476: History, Organization & Equipment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Military History of Late Rome 425–457 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRome Seizes the Trident: The Defeat of Carthaginian Seapower & the Forging of the Roman Empire Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Goths Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Offa and the Mercian Wars: The Rise and Fall of the First Great English Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Medieval Mercenaries: The Business of War Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5
Wars & Military For You
The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Last Kingdom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Resistance: The Warsaw Ghetto Uprising Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Killing: The Psychological Cost of Learning to Kill in War and Society Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The God Delusion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art of War: The Definitive Interpretation of Sun Tzu's Classic Book of Strategy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Masters of the Air: America's Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Band of Brothers: E Company, 506th Regiment, 101st Airborne from Normandy to Hitler's Eagle's Nest Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Happiest Man on Earth: The Beautiful Life of an Auschwitz Survivor Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blitzed: Drugs in the Third Reich Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mysterious Case of Rudolf Diesel: Genius, Power, and Deception on the Eve of World War I Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Faithful Spy: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and the Plot to Kill Hitler Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War & Other Classics of Eastern Philosophy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Daily Creativity Journal Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Making of the Atomic Bomb Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Wager Disaster: Mayem, Mutiny and Murder in the South Seas Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dr. Seuss Goes to War: The World War II Editorial Cartoons of Theodor Seuss Geisel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Afghanistan Papers: A Secret History of the War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Churchill's Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare: The Mavericks Who Plotted Hitler's Defeat Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unit 731: Testimony Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Doctors From Hell: The Horrific Account of Nazi Experiments on Humans Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of the Women Who Helped Win World War II Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Medieval Warfare
1 rating0 reviews
Book preview
Medieval Warfare - Bob Carruthers
This edition published in 2013 by
Pen & Sword Military
An imprint of
Pen & Sword Books Ltd
47 Church Street
Barnsley
South Yorkshire
S70 2AS
First published in Great Britain in 2012 in digital format by
Coda Books Ltd.
Copyright © Coda Books Ltd, 2012
Published under licence by Pen & Sword Books Ltd.
ISBN 978 1 78159 224 3
eISBN 9781473846746
This book contains an extract from ‘British Battles on Land and Sea’ by James Grant. Published by Cassell and Company Limited, 1894.
A CIP catalogue record for this book is
available from the British Library
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing.
Printed and bound in India
By Replika Press Pvt. Ltd.
Pen & Sword Books Ltd incorporates the Imprints of Pen & Sword Aviation, Pen & Sword Family History, Pen & Sword Maritime, Pen & Sword Military, Pen & Sword Discovery, Pen & Sword Politics, Pen & Sword Atlas, Pen & Sword Archaeology, Wharncliffe Local History, Wharncliffe True Crime, Wharncliffe Transport, Pen & Sword Select, Pen & Sword Military Classics, Leo Cooper, The Praetorian Press, Claymore Press, Remember When, Seaforth Publishing and Frontline Publishing
For a complete list of Pen & Sword titles please contact
PEN & SWORD BOOKS LIMITED
47 Church Street, Barnsley, South Yorkshire, S70 2AS, England
E-mail: enquiries@pen-and-sword.co.uk
Website: www.pen-and-sword.co.uk
CONTENTS
AN INTRODUCTION TO MEDIEVAL WARFARE
I HASTINGS, 1066
II THE BATTLE OF THE STANDARD, 1138
III DAMME- BOUVINES- DOVER, 1214 - 1217
IV LEWES, 1264 - EVESHAM, 1265 - IN THE CHANNEL, 1293
V STIRLING BRIDGE, 1297 - FALKIRK, 1298
VI BANNOCKBURN, 1314
VII HALIDON HILL, 1333 - SLUYS, 1346
VIII CRESSY, 1346
IX DURHAM, 1346 - WINCHELSEA, 1349
X POICTIERS, 1356
XI THE BLACK PRINCE IN SPAIN- NAJERA, 1367
XII SEA-FIGHT, 1378 - OTTERBURNE, OR CHEVY CHASE, 1388
XIII HOMILDON, 1402 - SHREWSBURY, 1403
XIV AGINCOURT, 1415
XV BAUJÉ, 1421 - CREVANT, 1423 - VERNEUIL, 1424
XVI ROVERAI, 1429
XVII BLORE HEATH, 1459 - ST. ALBANS; TOWTON, 1461 - BARNET, 1471
AN INTRODUCTION TO MEDIEVAL WARFARE
THE EXPERIENCE level and tactical manoeuvring ability of medieval armies varied depending on the period and region. For larger battles, pre-battle planning typically consisted of a council of the war leaders, which could either be the general laying down a plan or a noisy debate between the different leaders, depending on how much authority the general possessed. Battlefield communications before the advent of strict lines of communication were naturally very difficult. Communication was done through musical signals, audible commands, messengers, or visual signals such as raising a standard banner or flag.
The infantry, including missile troops (such as archers), would typically be employed at the outset of the battle to break open infantry formations while the cavalry attempted to defeat its opposing number. If the cavalry met foot soldiers, the pikemen would engage them. Perhaps the most important technological advancement for medieval warfare in Europe was the invention of the stirrup. It most likely came to Europe with the Avars in the 7th century, although it was not properly adopted by the major European powers until the 10th century.
Once one side coaxed their opposing infantry into breaking formation, the cavalry would be deployed in attempt to exploit the loss of cohesion in the opposing infantry lines and begin slaying the infantrymen in the pandemonium. Once a break in the lines was exploited, the cavalry became instrumental to victory, causing further breakage in the lines and wreaking havoc amongst the infantrymen, as it is much easier to kill a man from the top of a horse than to stand on the ground and face a half-ton destrier (large warhorse) carrying an armed knight. However, until a significant break in the enemy infantry lines arose, the cavalry could not be used to much effect against infantry since horses are not easily harried into a wall of pikemen. Pure infantry conflicts would be lengthy and drawn-out.
Muzzle-loaded cannons were introduced to the battlefield in the later medieval period. However, their very poor rate of fire (which often meant that only one shot was fired in the course of an entire battle) and their inaccuracy made them more of a psychological force multiplier than an effective anti-personnel weapon. Later on in medieval warfare, once hand cannons were introduced, the rate of fire improved only slightly, but the cannons became far easier to aim, largely because they were smaller and much closer to their wielder. Their users could be easily protected, because the cannons were lighter and could be moved far more quickly.
A hasty retreat could cause greater casualties than an organized withdrawal, because the fast cavalry of the winning side’s rearguard would intercept the fleeing enemy while their infantry continued their attack. In most medieval battles, more soldiers were killed during the retreat than in battle, since mounted knights could quickly and easily dispatch the archers and infantry who were no longer protected by a line of pikes as they had been during the previous fighting.
FORTIFICATIONS
Breakdowns in centralized states led to the rise of a number of groups that turned to large-scale pillage as a source of income. Most notably the Vikings (but also Arabs, Mongols and Magyars) raided significantly. As these groups were generally small and needed to move quickly, building fortifications was a good way to provide refuge and protection for the people and the wealth in the region.
These fortifications evolved over the course of the Middle Ages, the most important form being the castle, a structure which has become linked with the medieval era to many. The castle served as a protected place for the local elites. Inside a castle they were protected from bands of raiders and could send mounted warriors to drive the raiders from the area, or to disrupt the efforts of larger armies to supply themselves in the region by gaining local superiority over foraging parties that would be impossible against the whole enemy host.
Fortifications were a very important part of warfare because they provided safety to the lord, his family, and his servants. They provided refuge from armies too large to face in open battle. The ability of the heavy cavalry to dominate a battle on an open field was useless against fortifications. Building siege engines was a time-consuming process, and could seldom be effectively done without preparations before the campaign. Many sieges could take months, if not years, to weaken or demoralize the defenders sufficiently. Fortifications were an excellent means of ensuring that the elite could not be easily dislodged from their lands - as Count Baldwin of Hainaut commented in 1184 on seeing enemy troops ravage his lands from the safety of his castle, they can’t take the land with them
.
SIEGE WARFARE
In the Medieval period besieging armies used a wide variety of siege engines including: scaling ladders; battering rams; siege towers and various types of catapults such as the mangonel, onager, ballista, and trebuchet. Siege techniques also included mining in which tunnels were dug under a section of the wall and then rapidly collapsed to destabilize the wall’s foundation. A final technique was to bore into the enemy walls, however this was not nearly as effective as other methods due to the thickness of castle walls. Several of these siege techniques were used by the Romans but experienced a rebirth during the Crusades.
The Walls of Dubrovnik are a series of defensive stone walls, never breached by hostile army, that have surrounded and protected a maritime city-state of Dubrovnik (Ragusa), situated in southern Croatia.
Advances in the prosecution of sieges encouraged the development of a variety of defensive counter-measures. In particular, medieval fortifications became progressively stronger - for example, the advent of the concentric castle from the period of the Crusades - and more dangerous to attackers - witness the increasing use of machicolations and murder-holes, as well the preparation of hot or incendiary substances. Arrow slits, concealed doors for sallies, and deep water wells were also integral to resisting siege at this time. Designers of castles paid particular attention to defending entrances, protecting gates with drawbridges, portcullises and barbicans. Wet animal skins were often draped over gates to repel fire. Moats and other water defenses, whether natural or augmented, were also vital to defenders.
In the Middle Ages, virtually all large cities had city walls - Dubrovnik in Dalmatia is an impressive and well-preserved example - and more important cities had citadels, forts or castles. Great effort was expended to ensure a good water supply inside the city in case of siege. In some cases, long tunnels were constructed to carry water into the city. In other cases, such as the Ottoman siege of Shkodra, Venetian engineers had designed and installed cisterns that were fed by rain water channeled by a system of conduits in the walls and buildings. Complex systems of underground tunnels were used for storage and communications in medieval cities like Tábor in Bohemia. Against these would be matched the mining skills of teams of trained sappers, who were sometimes employed by besieging armies.
Until the invention of gunpowder-based weapons (and the resulting higher-velocity projectiles), the balance of power and logistics definitely favored the defender. With the invention of gunpowder, the traditional methods of defense became less and less effective against a determined siege.
ORGANIZATION
The medieval knight was usually a mounted and armoured soldier, often connected with nobility or royalty, although (especially in north-eastern Europe) knights could also come from the lower classes, and could even be unfree persons. The cost of their armor, horses, and weapons was great; this, among other things, helped gradually transform the knight, at least in western Europe, into a distinct social class separate from other warriors. During the crusades, holy orders of Knights fought in the Holy Land (see Knights Templar, the Hospitallers, etc.).
Heavily armed cavalry, armed with lances and a varied assortment of hand weapons played a significant part in the battles of the Middle Ages. The heavy cavalry consisted of wealthy knights and noblemen who could afford the equipment and non-noble squires employed by noblemen. Heavy cavalry was the difference between victory and defeat in many key battles. Their thunderous charges could break the lines of most infantry formations, making them a valuable asset to all medieval armies.
Hungarian raids in the 10th century. Most European nations were praying for mercy: Sagittis hungarorum libera nos Domine
- Lord save us from the arrows of Hungarians.
Light cavalry consisted usually of lighter armed and armoured men, who could have lances, javelins or missile weapons, such as bows or crossbows. In the Dark Ages and much of the Middle Ages light cavalry usually consisted of wealthy commoners. Later in the Middle Ages light cavalry would also include sergeants who were men who had trained as knights but could not afford the costs associated with the title. Light cavalry were used as scouts, skirmishers or outflankers. Many countries developed their own styles of light cavalry, such as Hungarian mounted archers, Spanish jinetes, Italian and German mounted crossbowmen and English currours.
Costumes of Roman and German Soldiers From Miniatures on different Manuscripts, from the Sixth to the Twelfth Centuries. Infantry were recruited and trained in a wide variety of manners in different regions of Europe all through the Middle Ages, and probably always formed the most numerous part of a medieval field army. Many infantrymen in prolonged wars would be mercenaries. Most armies contained significant numbers of spearmen, archers and other unmounted soldiers. In sieges, perhaps the most common element of medieval warfare,[citation needed] infantry units served as garrison troops and archers, among other positions. Near the end of the Middle Ages, with the advancements of weapons and armour, the infantryman became more important to an army.
RECRUITING
In the earliest Middle Ages it was the obligation of every noble to respond to the call to battle with his own equipment, archers, and infantry. This decentralized system was necessary due to the social order of the time, but could lead to motley forces with variable training, equipment and abilities. The more resources the noble had access to, the better his troops would typically be. Typically the feudal armies consisted of a core of highly skilled knights and their household troops, mercenaries hired for the time of the campaign and feudal levies fulfilling their feudal obligations, who usually were little more than rabble. They could, however, be efficient in disadvantageous terrain. Towns and cities could also field militias.
As central governments grew in power, a return to the citizen and mercenary armies of the classical period also began, as central levies of the peasantry began to be the central recruiting tool. It was estimated that the best infantrymen came from the younger sons of free land-owning yeomen, such as the English archers and Swiss pikemen. England was one of the most centralized states in the Late Middle Ages, and the armies that fought the Hundred Years’ War were mostly paid professionals. In theory, every Englishman had an obligation to serve for forty days. Forty days was not long enough for a campaign, especially one on the continent. Thus the scutage was introduced, whereby most Englishmen paid to escape their service and this money was used to create a permanent army. However, almost all high medieval armies in Europe were composed of a great deal of paid core troops, and there was a large mercenary market in Europe from at least the early 12th century.
As the Middle Ages progressed in Italy, Italian cities began to rely mostly on mercenaries to do their fighting rather than the militias that had dominated the early and high medieval period in this region. These would be groups of career soldiers who would be paid a set rate. Mercenaries tended to be effective soldiers, especially in combination with standing forces, but in Italy they came to dominate the armies of the city states. This made them problematic; while at war they were considerably more reliable than a standing army, at peacetime they proved a risk to the state itself like the Praetorian Guard had once been. Mercenary-on-mercenary warfare in Italy led to relatively bloodless campaigns which relied as much on manoeuvre as on battles, since the condottieri recognized it was more efficient to attack the enemy’s ability to wage war rather than his battle forces, discovering the concept of indirect warfare 500 years before Sir Basil Liddell Hart, and attempting to attack the enemy supply lines, his economy and his ability to wage war rather than risking an open battle, and manoeuvre him into a position where risking a battle would have been suicidal. Macchiavelli misunderstood the indirect approach as cowardice.
The knights were drawn to battle by feudal and social obligation, and also by the prospect of profit and advancement. Those who performed well were likely to increase their landholdings and advance in the social hierarchy. The prospect of significant income from pillage and ransoming prisoners was also important. For the mounted knight Medieval Warfare could be a relatively low risk affair. Nobles avoided killing each other, rather preferring capturing them alive, for several reasons - for one thing, many were related to each other, had fought alongside one another, and they were all (more or less) members of the same elite culture; for another, a noble’s ransom could be very high, and indeed some made a living by capturing and ransoming nobles in battle. Even peasants, who did not share the bonds of kinship and culture, would often avoid killing a nobleman, valuing the high ransom that a live capture could bring, as well as the valuable horse, armour and equipment that came with him. However, this is by no means a rule of medieval warfare. It was quite common, even at the height of chivalric
warfare, for the knights to suffer heavy casualties during battles.
- CHAPTER I -
HASTINGS, 1066
THE MOST important battle ever fought on English soil is unquestionably that of Hastings; not only because of the great strength of the invading force, the perfect success of the enterprise, and the dreadful misery which fell upon the conquered English for several generations, till the Norman element became blended, if not altogether lost, in the Saxon, but also on account of many incidents peculiar to that short and terrible war.
From the day of the accession of Harold, the son of Godwin, to the English throne, the dread of a Norman invasion haunted him, for William of Normandy had sworn to stake on the issue of battle his personal right to that throne, which he claimed as the bequest of the Confessor; and during the summer of 1066 all his dukedom and the territories of his adherents resounded with the notes of preparation. He received a banner, consecrated by the Pope; and through all Maine and Anjou, Poitou and Bretagne, Flanders, Aquitaine, and Burgundy, the mail was burnished, the spear flashed, and the steed galloped; while lawless barons, whose ruined castles now stud the Rhine, wild robbers from the base of the Alps, knight, varlet, and vagrant, we are told, all mustered to join this holy banner, that was to be the guide to the pillage and conquest of England.
Good pay and broad lands to every one who will serve Duke William with spear, with sword, and bow,
was said on all hands; and the duke himself added to Fitz-Osborn, as in perspective he parcelled out the fair land of England in fiefs to his Norman knights, This Harold hath not the strength of mind to promise the least of those things that belong to me. But I have the right to promise that which is mine, and also that which belongs to him. He must be the victor who can give away both his own and that which belongs to the foe.
The Normans were then in the zenith of their military glory. In France they had acquired a noble territory; a few of their adventurous knights, by overcoming Italians, Greeks, and Germans, had laid the foundation of the opulent kingdom of Naples and Sicily: and thus the friends of William were as confident of success as they were resolute and fearless.
Every harbour and roadstead in his dominions and in those of his allies was busy with preparation throughout the summer and spring of that eventful year. Workmen were employed at all the ports, building ships, setting up masts, and stretching sails. William had need of ships to cope with that Saxon navy which was the legacy of Alfred; for now the last of the Saxon kings
had assembled at Sandwich the largest fleet and army that England had ever seen, to resist the coming invaders, though the population was not then supposed to exceed 2,000,000, while two of the present English border counties, Westmoreland and Cumberland, belonged to the King of Scotland.
Thierry estimates the entire fleet of William as amounting to 400 ships with masts and sails, and more than 1,000 transport boats (Hume says 3,000 sail); while his army, now fully collected, was carefully organised by him according to the tactics of the day, and its fiery masses were welded together by the powerful and combined influences of love of glory and adventure, fanaticism, conquest, and plunder.
They mustered 60,000 men. Among them were Eustace, Count of Boulogne, Ameri de Thouars, Hugh d’Etaples, Guillaume d’Evreux, Geoffrey de Rotau, Roger de Beaumont, Guillaume de Warrenne, Roger de Montgomerie, Hugh de Grantmesnil, Charles Martel, and other knights and nobles, whose muster-roll of names, as given by Grafton, in his Black Letter Chronicle,