Continuum
Journal of Media & Cultural Studies
ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ccon20
Vampire apocalypse and the evolutionary sublime:
the ‘End of Days’ in John Logan’s Penny Dreadful
Stephanie Green
To cite this article: Stephanie Green (2021) Vampire apocalypse and the evolutionary
sublime: the ‘End of Days’ in John Logan’s Penny�Dreadful, Continuum, 35:2, 270-281, DOI:
10.1080/10304312.2021.1936833
To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2021.1936833
Published online: 14 Jun 2021.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 129
View related articles
View Crossmark data
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=ccon20
CONTINUUM: JOURNAL OF MEDIA & CULTURAL STUDIES
2021, VOL. 35, NO. 2, 270–281
https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2021.1936833
Vampire apocalypse and the evolutionary sublime: the ‘End
of Days’ in John Logan’s Penny Dreadful
Stephanie Green
ABSTRACT
KEYWORDS
Supernatural narratives sustain popularity partly due to the way
they speak to threats, such as the idea that the appearance of the
monster heralds the inevitability of large–scale human destruction
or transformation. The theme of apocalypse has become increasingly prevalent in popular culture, widely rehearsed in Anglo–
American television horror since the 9/11 attack on New York
City – with its concomitant sense of vulnerability amongst
Western nations and growing ethos of social and political extremity.
In the third season of John Logan’s Penny Dreadful (Showtime/Sky),
Christian Camargo portrays the all–powerful vampire, Dracula, disguised as a charming museum curator, who entrances the female
lead, Vanessa Ives, with his terrifying vision of an evolutionary ‘end
of days’ (S3:E6). Vanessa’s struggle to resist the compulsion of
Dracula’s fatalistic embrace speaks to issues of pressing immediacy
in our own time, including the ambiguities of human agency in the
face of a transfigured world. This paper will interrogate the theme
of compulsive apocalypse and the sublime in John Logan’s Penny
Dreadful.
Vampire; apocalypse; Penny
dreadful; horror; fantasy;
sublime
Future fear
Vampire narratives sustain popularity at least partly due to the ways in which they speak
to perceived fears or threats – millennial transition, disease, oppression, antipathic identities, post–humanism or global war. Perhaps most urgent among these is the idea that
the vampire heralds the possibility of mass destruction or transformation on a nuclear
scale, through war, environmental disaster or disease pandemic. While the vampire
frequently figures in fantasy narratives as the embodiment of desire, the threat of extreme
catastrophe is often invoked as a vehicle for reflecting on contemporary and future fears.
This has intensified in Anglo–American television, as Bennett argues (2019), since the 9/11
attack on New York City, with its wake of social and political extremity.
The threat of extreme destruction is evoked in John Logan’s drama series Penny Dreadful
(Showtime/Sky, [2014] 2016), where the vampiric figure is personified in the character of an
all–powerful demon–vampire, Dracula (Christian Camargo), who has dominion over all dark
things. He seeks to end humankind and gain universal power. Disguised as a charming
science museum curator, he entrances the female lead, Vanessa Ives (Eva Green), drawing
on her supernatural abilities to drive forward his devastating vision of an evolutionary ‘end
of days’ (S3:E6, ‘No Beast So Fierce’). This paper will explore the idea of compulsive
CONTACT Stephanie Green
stephanie.green@griffith.edu.au
© 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
CONTINUUM: JOURNAL OF MEDIA & CULTURAL STUDIES
271
apocalypse in Penny Dreadful as an expression of tensions between archaic and modern
beliefs. By ‘compulsive’ I refer to the magnetic appeal of the monster and the associated
sense of a pull towards large–scale destruction as an inevitable, transcendent or purgative
force. My use of the term is partly informed by Bruno Latour’s critique of pessimistic
determinism in relation to the future of humanity (1993a, 2013b). While acknowledging
the centrality of historicity, Latour points out that the shape of the future is not absolutely
determined by a ‘stultified compulsion’ towards humanity’s failure (1993a, 330–31).
Resistance against the narrative of fatalism offers a way of refusing what Elżbieta Rybicka
calls the ‘erosion of memory’ (2012, 132–133), to reclaim shared values and culture, contest
the totalitarian imperatives of the past and refuse violent reactionism as a way of revivifying the future. Vanessa’s struggle against the compulsion of Dracula’s deathly embrace in
Penny Dreadful embodies this resistance and speaks to issues of pressing immediacy in our
own time, including the challenges and ambiguities of human agency, cultural knowledge
and shared future survival in the face of a transfigured world.
Stacey Abbott regards the proliferation of vampire and zombie stories as ‘two sides
of the undead coin’ (2016) that show social fears about the prefiguration of violent,
cataclysmic change that destroys the Earth or takes us beyond our human condition.
Whatever their platform or mode, supernatural threat stories show us a spectacle of
mass violence and consumption, invoking our horror of a viscerally invasive power –
our fear that past wars and plagues will return – while also entertaining us with
phantasmagorial thrills and spills. The dramatic treatment of the apocalypse narrative
can be humorous – as in the zombie film Warm Bodies (Levine/Mandeville 2013) or
Part Two, Season One of the witch television series The Chilling Adventures of Sabrina
(Aguirre–Sarcasa/Kreiger/Warner 2019–2020) – where the supposedly impending end
of days becomes a contextual intensifier for adventure and romance. The apocalypse
trope has not only haunted the horror narrative as a figure of repressed anxiety,
however, but has also come to represent the impulse of intensely destructive fears in
response to real, immediate and overwhelming dangers as those being witnessed in
relation to climate change, violent racial discrimination and the coronavirus pandemic
of 2020.
The idea of the monster apocalypse in Penny Dreadful alludes to the vision of an epoch in
which history, the idea of the past, is abandoned. The modern world is on the brink, ceasing
to be as it is known, about to become something sublime, terrifyingly ineffable, almost
beyond human imagining and therefore virtually beyond our capacity to resist. As Henry
Day observes, in relation to cultural and social instances of extreme violence which blur
distinctions between real and virtual entertainment depictions of violence, the sublime
‘comes to signify not communion with the infinite but a sense of radical alienation, of
a trauma so overwhelming it defies comprehension’ (2013, 8). More powerful than incomprehension, however, is the vortex of excitation and horror that the sublime conveys: the
irresistible appeal of death as escape, sacrifice and illusory yearning for a pure resurrection.
In literary terms, then, the series deliberately sets out to resonate with a post-Romantic
vision of encroachment through the rapidity of destructive change in our own time, while
offering the remaining possibility of recovery and survival through allegiance or community.
272
S. GREEN
Reshaping stories
Penny Dreadful is set in a reimagined London at the Victorian fin de siècle, filmed on
location in Dublin and at Bray’s Ardmore studios in Ireland. It is built on richly referential
story platform, with characters sourced from late-Victorian popular genre fiction, including Bram Stoker’s 1897 novel Dracula, Oscar Wilde’s The Picture of Dorian Gray (1890), R.L.
Stevenson’s Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (1886), and a host of sensation novels and novelettes
including American ‘dime store’ westerns. As Anita Nel Bech Albertsen argues, the
characters can be conceived of as mashups that are, in a sense, contaminated by facets
of monstrosity that challenge and modify the biases of their source archetypes (2017).
This provides for a complex and evolving portrayal of the characters as their stories adapt
and change, filtered through grotesquerie, horror and emotion. Further, the show’s
references to historically popular stories, theatre, paintings, costume, etc., signals its
sustained reflexivity, drawing attention to the elements of its own making as spectacular
fantasy entertainment. Penny Dreadful’s elaborate use of recursive adaptation technique
also points forward, however, to contemporary transmedia character developments, with
the publication of post–production graphic fiction and a new television series set in Los
Angeles which brings new possibilities for story transformation (Logan/Aguilar/Showtime
2020).
The original three season television series flirts with the historical modernities of its
late-Victorian/Edwardian London setting alluding to the popular discourses and anxieties
of the age – spiritualism, sexuality, industrialization, women’s suffrage, science and
psychology – weaving its stories of battles with the ‘demimonde’ through a gothically
heightened fantasy cityscape. The story follows Vanessa’s struggle to resist the mysterious
demon – Dracula – and the damage his power brings to humanity through failing
individual agency, irrecoverable social and environmental destruction and the threat of
a radical alterity yet to come. In this story context, the evolutionary doctrine of ‘survival of
the fittest’ is repurposed for a new kind of species dominance, not by politicians but by
supernaturally ‘evolved’ predators, with devastating implications.
The modernity of Penny Dreadful is reflected in its narrative thrust towards the
unleashing of an accelerated human apocalypse: a threatened extinction due to change
beyond our control. This theme echoes fin de siècle literary preoccupations, in particular
the poetic vision of spinning disaggregation captured in W. B. Yeats’s figure of the ‘gyre’
as the moment of crisis in which the past and the future are joined (‘The Second Coming’
[1920] 1994, 158; Kermode 2000, 100). Here, however, the impending crisis is imbued with
more contemporary social, environmental and narrative concerns.
Logan’s avowed aims with this series were to create a group of characters at the cusp of
the nineteenth–century, centred around Vanessa Ives, living through social and psychic
trauma, dissonance and loneliness in the face of future uncertainty. In various ways, with
this series, the writer sought to reflect the pressure of early twenty-first century
challenges:
There’s something about the Victorian Era that reminds me of right now. They were on the
cusp of a modern world. The agrarian economy has been replaced by industrial economy.
They’re looking across the ocean to Germany and America. They were grappling with the very
elemental question of what it is to be human, with Darwinism and evolution (Christina Radish,
Collider, 18 January 2014).
CONTINUUM: JOURNAL OF MEDIA & CULTURAL STUDIES
273
Logan refers here to the uncharted waters of the future – human impacts through climate
change, viral pandemics and technology on the world we know – as beyond current
understanding. In Penny Dreadful, he recasts the anxiety invoked by this feeling of
incomprehensibility within a supernatural world, where the boundaries between human
and non–human entities are being broken, threatening the nature of existence with
a seemingly unstoppable visceral and emotional transformation.
Bennett defines apocalypse as it is rehearsed in contemporary television fantasy as
‘one or more events that occur or are threatened that cause or would cause large scale
destruction and/or harm to the human race’ (2019, 7). Given the scale and complexity of
threats now facing humankind on Earth, the invocation of fear in this series seems
particularly timely. Nevertheless, the apocalypse narrative is far from a new or original
one. Frank Kermode discusses the recurring theme of apocalypse in literature as the
expression of ‘a pattern of anxiety’ that reflects a sense of perpetual change leading to an
end (2000, 96). Inherent in the notion of fin de siècle, is an artificial but commonplace
impression of crisis, a ‘fiction of transition’ (Kermode 2000, 100–101) allowing us to create
a fathomable story of the past. While Kermode argues that the cultural phenomenon of
anticipated destruction is hardly new (2000, 95), transmedial fantasy narratives of destructive transition are certainly an intensely popular preoccupation with early twenty-first
century readers and audiences. As Stephen Joyce remarks, recent popular culture is
‘unusually obsessed with the end of civilisation as a form of amusement’ (2018, 3), as
exemplified by the television series The Walking Dead (AMC 2010 –) and video games such
as The Last of Us (Naughty Dog 2013), among many others. Arguably, for the current
inhabitants of the planet facing the mass spectacle of deforestation, polar melting,
extreme forest fires and other disruptions of climate change, the prevalence of apocalypse
themes in contemporary transmedia narrative echoes fears that seem all too urgent and
real.
Latour alludes to the idea of apocalypse as a mechanism for a kind of serious play that
allows us to think differently, about the past, the future and, of course, about ourselves:
The fireworks of the Apocalypse are not there to prepare you for a rapturous upload to
Heaven, but on the contrary, to make you ready to avoid being chased off the Earth by Earth’s
own reaction to your presence. It is a harsh solution, but it seems the only way to oblige us to
turn our attention around after so many years of neglecting what happened behind our back.
(2013b, 111)
It is risky to use the apocalypse trope in popular discourse because the ethos of inevitability that apocalypse entails can overshadow the prospect of multi–species survival. In
the gothic or horror narrative, it can be problematic, too, because it plays into the inherent
undecidability of the genre, troubling definitions and aims as well as roles and identities.
Importantly, in either context, however, the notion of compulsive apocalypse raises the
question of ‘who decides?’ Who or what has the subtlety and the power, real or supernatural, to foster the intricate survival of diverse beings in the realm of the future? Latour
calls into question the idea of human agency and ‘the politics of assembling a character
which is pushed to the centre but which simultaneously loses its boundary, consistence
and definition because it is tied’ to that which takes us beyond ‘the human’ (2017c, 46). He
cites Donna Haraway’s term – ‘response–ability’ (Latour 2017c, 38), to invoke the necessity
for individuals to respond to destructive change, referring to human agency in relation to
274
S. GREEN
the study of Anthropology and the Anthropocene, and the need to take action in troubled
times. The point is a reminder of the ontological demands of being human at the
Anthropocene, the tensions that surround the idea of response–ability, resistance and/
or surrender to cataclysm, or commitment to the possibility of a flourishing future of
peace and coexistence among human and non-human beings.
Such ideas can inform a study of modernity and the sublime in Penny Dreadful, where
a mytho–Victorian character with magical powers – who exists amid a carnivalesque
milieu of adventurers, artists, performers, decadents, mediums, prostitutes, demons,
vampires, witches, werewolves and other non-human beings – must confront the question of her own belief in the value of human survival. Specifically, it is the narrative
magnetism of profound and destructive transformation with which the character of
Vanessa Ives contends, made vulnerable by her difference, that I now explore in this
discussion as a representational mechanism for present existential concerns.
Characterizing transformational power
An ambiguous character from the outset, Vanessa’s powers are not easily defined. She
seems to embody a link or conduit between the modern human world and an ancient
dark force. She is not simply a medium, witch or host. Her skills have been developed
through rigorous training with a long-lived witch known to rural villagers as the ‘cut wife’
Joan, as portrayed in Season 2. Vanessa can cast curses and spells using verbis diablo
(Schubart 2017), a language of magical power, which was constructed for the series by
David J. Peterson. As Marielle Wakim reported in the Los Angeles Magazine
(30 September 2015), verbis diablo was made up from a pastiche of Latin, Arabic,
Akkadian, Middle Egyptian, Farsi and Turkish to convey an impression of ‘the Devil’s
corruption of language’ Described as a Daywalker (S2: E4 ‘Evil Spirits in Heavenly
Places’), Vanessa is a human witch whose abilities ultimately allow her to unite with the
demon and destroy what exists – to create a new order of being.
Throughout the entire series, Vanessa is physically embattled, her body torn between
human empathy, medical control and supernatural destruction. She belongs outwardly to
an upper–middleclass British way of life that rehearses the style and manners of late–
Victorian polite society. She takes tea in her drawing room, with its elegant furniture,
attends balls and the theatre, dressed in silk, jewels and lace. Yet, throughout Seasons One
and Two she is repeatedly locked in raw struggle with an unnamed and unseen demon
and its minions. It has been suggested that her spiritual/supernatural ability emerges as
a psychic split due to guilt after her affair with her friend Mina’s fiancé, Captain Branson
(Schubart 2018, 254–255), which somehow causes a tear in the ethos that allows the
demimonde to break through containment. Nevertheless, her ambiguous power seems to
be ancient in its source and pressing in its determination. The allusions to Ancient
Egyptian magic help to create this sense of an archaic force, repeatedly evoked through
Season Two.
Vanessa’s actions and strange behaviours are interpreted variously by those around her
as madness and possession. She is plagued by guilt, apparent lunacy, three evil witches,
the demon himself and her own desires, including her wish for acceptance. Barely an
episode passes without her thin pale body being tortured, possessed or marked in some
way by supernatural attack or asylum incarceration. She is repeatedly called by the demon
CONTINUUM: JOURNAL OF MEDIA & CULTURAL STUDIES
275
to summon him into her dimension and although she learns spells and incantations to
ward him off, he gradually breaks through. She suffers hot and cold treatments prescribed
for lunatics and is locked, weeping, in a padded cell (S1: E5, ‘Closer than Sisters’; S3: E3
‘Good and Evil Braided Be’). In Seasons One and Two she withstands these incursions, with
the support of her fellow contenders against supernatural devilment who each carry their
own burdens of ambiguous humanity or moral culpability. Only in the third season, after
her friends leave London on new quests of their own, when a profound sense of loss
weakens her resolve, does she become vulnerable to the vampiric apex predator,
attracted by the promise of intimacy, the demon’s passion for her darkness and the
promise of a shared purpose that can free her from lonely suffering.
We do not meet the demon vampire Dracula himself until Season Three, but his
presence is implied from the very first episode in the series, when Mina is seduced by
a ‘foreign’ nobleman and hidden from friends and family in a strange nether realm. In the
meantime, Vanessa makes friends, lovers and enemies of a host of characters from the
repertoire of sensation and popular fiction including an American werewolf (Ethan
Chandler – Josh Hartnett), a titled detective (Sir Malcom Murray – Timothy Dalton),
a mad scientist (Dr Frankenstein – Harry Treadaway) and his irrepressible progeny,
Caliban (John Clare – Rory Kinnear). The demon appears in human form in Season
Three when Vanessa becomes most vulnerable to the magnetic persuasion of his overtures (S3: E6, ‘No Beast So Fierce’). Dracula appeals to her despair, her desire to become
‘something else,’ to cast aside her suffering, her feeling that only the full-scale annihilation
of humanity can release the Earth from material limitations. This desire is so powerful that
she ultimately abandons her home and joins him in his lair after a seduction in which he
first appeals to her mind, and then to her longing for connection (S3: E7, ‘Ebb Tide’).
Dracula, evolution and fantasy
While the historical vampire is in some respects a seductive figure, characterized by
a romantic ethos of seduction and surrender, themes of commerce, science and modernity have become commonplace vehicles for anxiety in vampire screen narrative.
Although not the first of his kind,1 the vampire as a decaying aristocratic predator
(Frayling 1992, 108) is epitomized in fiction by Stoker’s long-lived scion of ancient
conquerors Count Dracula ([1897] 1997, 33), whose adaptative popularity now extends
across a host of text and media platforms. In surviving the past, the rise and fall of
provinces and empires, as Attila Viragh suggests, this creature of the living dead is
a victim of cultural annihilation, a ‘subaltern struggling against cultural loss’ (2013, 223).
Yet this same vampire whose lands, cultural practices, even languages, are lost with the
passing of epochs is also portrayed as a practically-minded entrepreneur who adapts to
compete and survive in a changing world (Khair and Höglund 2012). Eric Kwan–Wai Yu
reminds us that Stoker’s Count Dracula is ‘not only able to modernize . . . familiarizing
himself with modern–day legal and commercial transactions, but also able to move freely
around England like an English gentleman without attracting public attention’
(2006, 147).
The short-lived but visually striking television series entitled Dracula starring
Jonathan Rhys Meyers captures this ethos of adaptive adventurism, in which science
and commerce offer a vehicle to contend with romantic sacrifice (Haddon/Knauff/NBC
276
S. GREEN
2013). In Episode One, the Count arrives in London society in the persona of a wealthy
American industrialist with scientific interests, a gentleman of means, at home amongst
the money–makers of late nineteenth century London. A striving manufacturer of
a future he seeks to create, at once modern and archaic, he spruiks his technological
invention for a new kind of energy. This is partly a cover story for an old promise of
revenge against the secret society, Order of the Dragon, which has long sought to
destroy him, and as an investment in a laboratory experiment to develop a ‘solar
vaccine’ to protect the vampire kind from sunlight, and thus from the risk of annihilation. This take on Dracula franchise had only a brief existence: while demonstrating the
continued lushness of televisual vampiric dramatization, the show was pulled after ten
episodes. The science solution narrative exists elsewhere in the vampire screen repertoire, however, often preceded, as Clasen and Abbott both point out (2010; 2016), by
Matheson’s novel I Am Legend (1954), the story of the last human survivor after
a vampire virus takes over the world.
The trope of the vampire pandemic has given writing and screen industries a vast
source of metaphoric possibility for storytelling and social comment, from fear of
disease and difference, to weaponized science and the building of post-apocalyptic
communities, among the various so-called ‘scientific’ strands that recur in the vampiric
narrative space. In the television series True Blood (Ball/HBO [2008] 2014), the production of synthetic blood is American capitalism’s answer to the threat of a vampire
takeover. Earlier instances include The Hunger (Scott/MGM 1983) in which Susan
Sarandon plays the role of Miriam, a scientist who studies ageing in primates, or the
blood experiments in Daybreakers (Spierig Brothers 2009) where a plague has turned
the majority of humans into vampires. Similarly, Jim Jarmusch’s Only Lovers Left Alive
(RPC 2013), set against the ruined spectacle of decayed factory city, Detroit, is centred
around an underground trade in laboratory grade ONeg which enables vampires to
survive since human blood has become poisoned by environmental pollution –
a seemingly prescient reference since Detroit became a Covid19 epicentre in the USA
during the 2020 pandemic (Sara Alvarez et al., The Bridge, March 252,020). In their
different ways, each of these narratives, among many others, points to the threat of
human and/or vampire annihilation. It is the Dracula template, however, which perhaps
best captures the ways in which screen fantasy utilizes audience anxiety about bodily
incursion, scientific experimentation and an inchoate sense of apocalypse, which some
of Earth’s creatures are yet able to survive.
The recounting of Dracula as progressive gentleman scientist is reprised in the third
season of John Logan’s Penny Dreadful where the rise of the demon vampire is presaged
as the evolutionary inevitability of human destruction. Christian Camargo as the vampire makes himself known in London society as a progressive Victorian intellectual,
a charming museum expert in zoology and the ‘new’ theories of evolution (S3: E2,
‘Predators Far and Near’), but this persona is a cloak for the demon who rules the
demimonde. He beguiles Vanessa while, out of public sight, amidst the secret places of
the London night, this Darwinian Dracula reveals his powers as an all–powerful demonic
god. Full of frustrated fury, his aim is to entrance the object of his desire, Vanessa Ives,
and to use her vast supernatural power to unleash a dark evolution – his horrific vision
of the end of days in which human life is extinguished and the vampire gains total
dominion.
CONTINUUM: JOURNAL OF MEDIA & CULTURAL STUDIES
277
Reshaping the vampire universe
The demon breaks through Vanessa’s resistance in Season Three, during her incarceration
in an insane asylum, conveyed via the classic clichés of institutionalized psychology –
claustrophobic isolation, white padded cells stained with the sufferings of their inmates
and the barbaric instruments of pseudoscientific cure. The poignancy of Vanessa’s vulnerability is intensified when the demon visits her by inhabiting the body of the asylum ward
guard (Rory Kinnear) whose body later serves as the lifeless vessel Victor Frankenstein
uses to create his frightful Caliban, John Clare.
Guard/Demon We live in a mighty age of science and faithlessness. . . But you are not
a thing of the spirit, Vanessa. . . you’re a thing of the flesh. . . like me. You are the wolf, you’re
the scorpion and all those things that slip and soar and stalk through the deep forest in the
dark night. You’re powerful. You feel it coiling within you. . . be truly who you are.
Give me your flesh . . . give me your blood. . . Be my bride and then all light will end and
the world will live in darkness. . . The very air will be pestilence to mankind. . . and then our
brethren, the night creatures, will emerge. . . and feed. . . Such is our power. . . Such is our
kingdom. . . Such is my kiss. . .
Vanessa yes. . .
Guard/Demon One kiss and you’re free of all this. . . In this mortal world you’ll always be
shunned for your uniqueness. . . but not with me. . . They will lock you away in rooms like
this. They will brand you a freak and a sorceress, but I won’t. I love you for who you are,
Vanessa.
Vanessa What name do I whisper to you, beloved.
Guard/Demon I am the demon. I am the dragon. My name is Dracula.
Vanessa I see you clearly now. . .(S3: E3; 41:57–45:09)
Here, the vampire’s take on the survival of the fittest doctrine possesses devastating
implications, an opportunistic force for change that seeks to destroy or transform all
humanity. For Vanessa, who longs for acceptance, Dracula’s seductive embrace brings
forth an overwhelming desire to sublimate her power, to realize the expulsion of
loneliness.
The notion of sublime abjection is useful for understanding how fantasy fiction can
represent what may be unrepresentable in our daily lives: the horror and attraction of
being other, abject, all–powerful, yet apart, subject to invasion, exploitation and destruction. As defined by Julia Kristeva, the abject is that which ‘disturbs identity, system,
order . . . the in–between, the ambiguous’ (1982, 4) – the condition of being cast down,
dismembered, undead. According to Miller and Atherton, however, the abject in Kristeva’s
terms also enables a way of commenting on the catastrophic process of dehumanization:
a ‘shifting of perspectives’ (2017, 9), a closing off from others, even from personal
subjectivity. In Season Three of Penny Dreadful, the demon enchants Vanessa with his
doctrine of evolutionary apocalypse and the promise that she will reign with him over the
night creatures, but she is never wholly transfigured. Her resistance reveals the horror of
the lonely demagogue of power casting destruction over earthly dominions.
278
S. GREEN
Clasen remarks that ‘speculative fiction extrapolates from ordinary, realistic anxieties
and fantasies or presents them in metaphoric guise’ to entertain us, to engage our
imaginations and to give ‘symbolic form to universal human fears’ (2010, 314). We ask
‘what if’ and are comforted by the realization that such extreme possibilities of horror are
unreal. Yet, as we speak, human populations face threats that are far from universal, that
are in fact highly asymmetrical and all too real for many – war, disease, environmental
disaster, extreme disparities of wealth, and more. Brent Linsley argues that ‘apocalyptic
and post-apocalyptic fictions of the last few decades invite us to investigate the nature of
the changes taking place around us in light of a shifting perspective on the development
of capitalism’ and its unsustainability (2019, 196), warning against promises of utopian
solutions which further entrap humankind in a narrative of ongoing wastage. Schubart
suggests a more active way to understand the fantastic as a medium for meta-reflective
thinking, a cognitive approach, that offers a space within which to imagine the impossible, the yet–unreal (2018, 77). She argues that the fantastic can engage personal
reflexivity – a way of reimagining and rewriting the self through immersive engagement.
The notion of fantasy as a space of possibility is interesting here, however, in relation to
the ways in which Penny Dreadful explores narrative imperatives and character choices
that can destroy or renew but ultimately lead to survival through collective action. The
project of narrative – perhaps ultimately of all culture – is, arguably, to reassemble
humanity out of the abject and to remind us of our communal lives.
Sublime realization
The scientific meaning of the term sublime is vaporization.2 In our contemporary global
context, this can be read as a metaphor for the rendering of human form into something
so awe-ful and encompassing that it becomes ineffable in its scope. This is ultimately
a kind of transcendence, but the sublime must also be understood as the expression of
a cognitive engagement with a power – imagination – that compels us to record our
experiences in testimony, art, music, literature or poetry – without which is to risk
abjection, indeed to ‘risk a “forgetting” that may lead to the annihilation of the human
race’ (Miller and Atherton 2017). Rybicka writes of literature in relation to place as ‘vessel
of historical memory’ (2012, 138). She argues, with reference to Berent,3 that literature is
the archive of a living ‘bios,’ which is also a form of discussion with the past, present, and
future – the reflection of a dialogue of many voices which also becomes, in itself,
a repository for recollection (2012, 138). As an ensemble screen narrative built on
a repertoire of gothic and Romantic literary texts, Penny Dreadful reflects the idea of
creative expression as part of the work of memory, going beyond memorialization to
show, through Vanessa’s story, what happens when we forget who we are. It is despair at
the thought that death, destruction and loneliness are inevitable, to which Vanessa
succumbs, joining the demon and casting the city into a crumbling pall as Dracula has
summoned his night creatures and prepares to consign humanity to dust.
This horrific vision is apprehended by the seer Kaetenay who travels with Vanessa’s
friends from America to try to save her. They find London in turmoil, wreathed in the
poison fumes of supernatural ill will and occupied by the creatures of the night. Vanessa
herself is encased in the Demon’s dark glory, almost drained of her former human self (S3:
E8 ‘Perpetual Night’; E9 ‘The Blessed Dark’). The impending destruction of humanity is at
CONTINUUM: JOURNAL OF MEDIA & CULTURAL STUDIES
279
hand. The holocaust narrative is only halted when Vanessa begs her lover Ethan Chandler
(Josh Hartnett) to destroy her with a bullet – ‘what’s one life for all humanity?’ – rather than
let humanity and its civilizations be destroyed (S3: E9). It is hardly a happy end. Vanessa
dies in Ethan’s arms – her lair filled with soft shadows and ritual candlelight. Drained of her
life force, the vampire demon is conquered. The world is finally wrested from ultimate
destruction through human agency, by a refusal of the vampiric grand narrative. Abruptly,
London’s ordinary chaos is restored. No trace remains, in this ending, of the knowing
narratological playfulness and ironic subtlety that characterized much of the series.
Critics railed against the ending, arguing that Vanessa’s submission betrayed the
character and story parameters established in the first two seasons (McFarland Vox
30 June 2016). As a viewer I shared these reservations and the disappointment that the
series did not continue to a fourth season. What I find interesting about the show’s finale,
however, is the way it plays with the popular fantasies of the late Victorian era in serious
discursive terms – contrasting the materialist concerns of incipient modernity with the all
too human pull towards destruction, and the fragility of human agency in determining
the future survival of the planet. If the Victorians were living through a time of previously
inconceivable industrial change, in our time we have lived with the material threat of
annihilation since the nuclear experiments of the 1940s when our governments grasped
the possibility of planetary liquidation via nuclear force, and now through climate change.
The sense of horrific threat has long been a source of anticipation and excitation in
screen narrative. Miller and Atherton observe that, ‘the nuclear sublime stems from this
Burkean emphasis on horror and the resulting terror that transports the audience to
a place beyond description’ (2017). In the vampire universe, I suggest, the idea of
apocalypse refers to a more sustained catastrophe than that of explosive holocaust. It
engages a tension between an archaic desire for the lost possibilities of the past, the
seeming impossibility of an ‘end of days’ for the always already undead, and the high–
speed transformations of technological capitalism. This take on the Dracula story, in
particular, can be seen as a mechanism for negotiating new and old forms of power,
invoking the idea that the past will always be in contest with the future, a battle between
the living and the dead within a world whose survival is linked, as Penny Dreadful
suggests, to story as a vehicle for remembering and renegotiating the struggle between
loss, stasis and change.
Notes
1. Polidori’s languidly urbane novella The Vampyre was published in 1819. Franz Seraph
Chrismar’s short story ‘Der Vampyr’ was published in the literary journal Wiener Zeitschrift
on 12 December 1835; the first story (we know of) that links Vlad Dracula to the vampire
myth.
2. The scientific use of the term is given in a variety of dictionary sources. Merriam–Webster
Dictionary defines the intransitive verb as ‘to pass directly from the solid to the vapor state’
(2020): https://www.merriam–webster.com/dictionary/sublime/ and Biology Dictionary gives
it as meaning to ‘subject to the process of sublimation; to heat, volatilize, and condense in
crystals or powder; to distill off, and condense in solid form; hence, also, to purify’ (Biology
Online, 2001–2020): https://www.biologyonline.com/dictionary/Sublime/; while Cambridge
Dictionary avers its meaning as being ‘to change a solid directly into a gas without the solid
280
S. GREEN
first becoming a liquid’ (Cambridge University Press, 2020): https://dictionary.cambridge.org/
dictionary/english/sublime/
3. Berent, W. 1974. Ozimina. Wrocław: Ossolineum.
Disclosure statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Notes on contributor
Dr Stephanie Green is a writer and lecturer at Griffith University. Her recent publications include:
‘Fantasy, gender and power in Jessica Jones’ Continuum 33.2 (2019): 173–184, ‘Lily Frankenstein: the
Gothic New Woman’ Refractory 28 (2017) and Hospitality, Rape and Consent in Vampire Popular
Culture (Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), co–edited with Agnieszka Stasiewicz–Bieńkowska and David
Baker.
ORCID
Stephanie Green
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0718-073X
References
Abbott, S. 2016. Undead Apocalypse: Vampires and Zombies in the 21st Century. Edinburgh:
Edinburgh University Press.
Albertsen, A. N. B. 2017. “The Contaminant Cobweb: Complex Characters and Monstrous Mashup.”
Refractory, a Journal of Entertainment Media, 28. Accessed June 2019. http://refractory.unimelb.
edu.au/tag/pennydreadful/
Bennett, E. 2019. Gender in Post–9/11 American Apocalyptic TV: Representations of Masculinity and
Femininity at the End of the World. London: Bloomsbury.
Clasen, M. 2010. “Vampire Apocalypse: A Biocultural Critique of Richard Matheson’s I Am Legend.”
Philosophy and Literature, 34 (2): 313–328. doi:10.1353/phl.2010.0005.
Day, H. J. M. 2013. Lucan and the Sublime: Power, Representation and Aesthetic Experience.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Frayling, C. 1992. Vampyres: Lord Byron to Count Dracula. London: Faber & Faber.
Joyce, S. 2018. Transmedia Storytelling and the Apocalypse. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kermode, F. 2000. The Sense of an Ending: Studies in the Theory of Fiction. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Khair, T., and J. Höglund, eds. 2012. Transnational and Postcolonial Vampires: Dark Blood. London:
Palgrave Macmillan.
Kristeva, J. 1982. Powers of Horror (Vol. 98). New York: Presses of California, Columbia and Princeton.
Latour, B. 1993a. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. 2013b. “Facing Gaia: Six Lectures on the Political Theology of Nature.” Gifford Lectures on
Natural Religion. University of Edinburgh, February 18–28. https://www.giffordlectures.org/lec
tures/facinggaianewenquiry–naturalreligion\Sourcehttps://eportfolios.macaulay.cuny.edu/wake
field15/files/2015/01/LATOURGIFFORDSIXLECTURES_1.pdf
Latour, B. 2017c. “Anthropology at the Time of the Anthropocene.” In The Anthropology of
Sustainability: Beyond Development and Progress. Edited by M. Brightman and J. Lewis, London:
Palgrave, 1–16.
Linsley, B. 2019. “A Sense of Unending: Apocalypse and Post–Apocalypse in Novels of Late
Capitalism.” Doctoral Diss., University of Arkansas, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. 22583276.
Matheson, R. 1954. I Am Legend. New York: Gold Medal Books [Fawcett Publications].
CONTINUUM: JOURNAL OF MEDIA & CULTURAL STUDIES
281
Miller, A., and C. Atherton. 2017. “Monster in the Sky: Hibakusha Poetry and the Nuclear Sublime.” In
Romanticism and Contemporary Australian Writing: Legacies and Resistances, edited by S. Green
and P. Hetherington. Special Issue 41 TEXT Journal of Writing and Writing Programs (October).
ISSN: 1327–9556. http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30103892www.textjournal.com.au/spe
ciss/issue41/Miller&Atherton.pdf
Rybicka, E. 2012. “Place, Memory, Literature (From the Perspective of Geopoetics).” Teksty Drugie. (2)
Translated by Jan Pytalski. Special Issue: 126–139. rcin.org.pl
Schubart, R. 2017. “The Journey: Vanessa Ives and Edgework as Self–work.” Refractory: A Journal of
Entertainment Media 28 (6): http://refractory.unimelb.edu.au/2017/06/14/schubart/
Schubart, R. 2018. Mastering Fear: Women, Emotions, and Contemporary Horror. London: Bloomsbury
Publishing.
Stoker, B. [1897] 1997. Dracula. Reprinted. New York: Norton.
Viragh, A. 2013. “Can the Vampire Speak?: Dracula as Discourse on Cultural Extinction.” English
Literature in Transition, 1880–1920 56 (2): 231–245. muse.jhu.edu/article/493256
Yeats, W. B. [1920] 1994. “The Second Coming.” Reprinted. In Collected Poems, 158. Edited by Richard
J. Finneran. New York: Scribner.
Yu, E. K. 2006. “Productive Fear: Labor, Sexuality, and Mimicry in Bram Stoker’s Dracula.” Texas
Studies in Literature and Language 48 (2): 145–170. doi:10.1353/tsl.2006.0009.
Screen References
Dracula. 2013. Developed by C. Haddon and D. Knauff. Executive Producers: C. Callender and
D. Knauf. Release: NBC /Sky.
Daybreakers. 2009. Directed by Spierig Brothers. Producers: C. Brown, S. Furst and B. Furst. Release:
Screen Australia/Lionsgate.
Only Lovers Left Alive. 2013. Directed by J. Jarmusch.Producers: J. Thomas and R. Brundig. Release:
Recorded Picture Company/Soda/Pandora.
Penny Dreadful. [2014] 2016. J. Logan, A. Hinderaker and K. Wilson–Cairns. Executive Producers:
P. Harris, S. Mendes, J. Logan and K. Richards. Release: Showtime and Sky Atlantic.
Penny Dreadful: City of Angels. 2020. Created by J. Logan. Executive Producers: M. Aguilar, S. Mendes
and P. Harris. Release: Showtime.
The Chilling Adventures of Sabrina. [2018] 2020. Developed by R. Aguirre–Sarcasa, based on the
Archie Comics original. Executive Producers: L. Toland Kreiger, J. Goldwater, S. Schechter,
G. Berlanti. Release: Netflix.
True Blood. [2008] 2014. Developed by A. Ball. Executive Producers: A. Ball, G. Fienberg, B. Buckner,
R. Tucker, et al. Release: Warner Bros TV.
The Hunger. 1983. Directed by T. Scott. Producer: R. Shepherd. Release: MGM/UA.