Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Landscape ecological approach to hilly basin restoration in Sicily: the Magazzolo River near Bivona

1993, Landscape and Urban Planning

I.e. storms) frequently result in local disasters in Sicily. Common ofthat territory, but this is not the ultimate cause ot‘instabllEd TVbuild rescn:oirs. due to the long summer aridity (from May to arnfy done with concrete works. On the contrary. it is imponant to 5~s of Phrs sieuatron resuEEfrom the ecological degradation of the landscape, and to try to occurring. The importance of this analysis concerns the necessity to create and follow a in m-kr k, zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA I -CS~CK C zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA rhs mast preca-ious basin areas, Consequently. also preventing the e case study of the hilly basin of Xagazzofo River. in the municipalities of Bivona and Santa ity of proposing an unusual approach to the Province Author it and clay. The control of the river must be done pr;ncipaH) e ecology of the landscape rtant alteratio of the local land e necessity to exten storation of the suitable structure of the ~ar&q:C, based on new vegetate interacting with the most altered f The objective of this study, t comes crucial for the future of warm ranean iandscapes in Italy, as we can see by e continental part (North ) wit nean (Center, South) (Table 1 ve interventions zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Note that 99. i 96 of water resources of the So are dependent on reservoirs: their jmteractions with the landscape is very importa The present study, based on landscape ecolPresent address: Department of Biology, Section of Ecology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. @ I993 Elsevizr Science Publishers landscape ecologica It is important to underline t e existence of an ~3ogical \rW and ethological meaning of terri- B.V. All rights resewed 0 169-2046/9;/$06.00 Thermodynamic constraints may determine an attractor (minimurn external energy dissi- degrees Naveh, 1984; ifferent types o volution ) can of metastability The history of the interactions between landscape elements in a iven area shows a articular domain, charac recess allows a so 1 a radical It, zyxwvutsrqponmlkji belt Fig. 2. Principal geomorphological characters of the landscape. The geological structure of local soils indicates the differences in hydrology. The vegetational belt which includes Bivona and Santo Stefano is the submedkcrrawan one. ?!ote the ‘rscation of the clay zones. sity itte sea. ificial lake has be un~cipality of ivona, a town 5 k Santo Stefano, where t basin (270 m above se d buffering corridors natural and anthropic disturbances, linked to the into pacities of a system of ecosyste aintenance of maximum biological diver- ogical structure of summarized as follows: the su ountains of limestone luvial detritus below t between Santo Stefano and Bivona there are layers of clay and scaly clay (Fig. 2 ). Annual temperature: Bivona (600 m ), 1618°C (min. 8-lo), Santo Stefano (740 m), 14-16°C (min. 6-8). Annual rainfall: lower part (reservoir/Bi- r (0.5 HA zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfe 0.5-l HA 0 500 woo m. a a>2 Fig. 3. Grain size oftbe landscape. The river acts as an attractor resent. along the river, it ma) indicate a structural gap. for the fme-grained l-2 HA WA etements zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUT of the ecotissue. Where a coarse Fig. 5. Porosity pattern: wood and forest patches and corridors. Even if not complete at the borders, two areas ofaltered are visible in the central part, southeast and southwest of Bivona. structure Fig 6. Lmtat sample for measuring landscape hctcrogcr,cit>. Transect .-I -.A. on the northern side of the ri~,er i I.C. tight hank ). Obscn~ the quite well-defined structure of the landscape and the \vcll-distributed tou Btc (SW tclt ) clemcnts. __....__“_ _ -_---_ ---.-+ --_ _ -_ -I-F- -- .- - - -- _.-- - -_* -____ . _- _ _-- __ _ _-.._ c__ -. _-_._ / 500 zyxwvutsrqponmlk 400 300 ---.-_______ --__ -__- ___ -_ - - _ _-_ zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA --------.___ _ _ _ Fig. 7. %wr~t: 200 5 MCAL MQYear Linear sample for measuring landscape heterogeneity. Transect B-B, on the sotithcrn side of the river (i.e. left bank). khe more confused structure of the landscape and tb4e \vorse distriblrtion of Ycu Btc ccotope elements. s “z 3 ,- Table 5 Comparison with the regional scale, 1968 Landscape elements onal scale 1987 @%I area Btc %Iarea Btc Il.2 43.6 17.6 6.1 9.9 1I.,c 11 4.8 2.6 I.5 0.7 0.9 0.2 8.3 22.5 41.5 Il.7 6.2 3.5 6.2 2.4 1.4 0.8 I.0 3.3 100.0 2.09 100.0 Case study Sicily region % area Btc oioarea Btc 10.2 35.7 37.4 3.6 6.7 6.0 4.9 2.6 1.5 0.7 0.9 0.2 6.6 2 !.5 52.4 10.3 1.7 6.1 6.2 2.4 !.4 0.8 1.o 0.3 Wood and forest Orchard Arable land Meadow and pasture Uncultivated and bush Unproductive and urban Total. 1968 100.0 2.08 iP?.C -_ 1.80 1.82 Table 5 Stability type of ecotope subsystems Table 4 State of the ccotissue. Landscape elements Urbanized. dense River. lake Bare soil Arable field Orchard Olive orchard Meadow, pasture Bush Pine wood Wood, forest Total, 1968 I968 ha 86.25 18.37 45.00 942.50 600.00 290.93 90.25 166.50 17.50 235.98 2493.28 'HH.human habitat (Oh). Ciass Btc range Ordination’ K-O.5 A RC/D > 1. RS/D < I. or totally %HH’ O!oarea zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA E&C subsidized, or xtural very high 0.2 100 resilience 3.46 0.5-1.5 0.1 10 0.74 B Techno-agricultural fields. or natural 5 degraded ecotopvs. or natural resilience 0.2 1.80 1.5-2.5 lc)O RC/D= RS/D=- 1. or semi-natural 1.5 C 37.80 100 2.4 agricultural fielc s, or semi-degraded zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcba 24.06 3.0 100 CCU iQJ Cb 11.67 2.5-3.5 0.7 90 3.62 D i& diit ~~~~nt -~n ‘,gardens’, or semi0.9 20 natural olive wol)ds. or natural low Btc 6.68 3.5 25 ecotopes 0.70 3.5-B 5.0 30 E RC/D < 1, RS/D > 1, or non9.46 subsidized ecotopes, or natural 85 100.00 2.08 resistance ecotnpes ‘RC. recover)?; RS, resistance; D, disturbanre. Seasonai distribution: -winter f max ). spring Zoological pecuiiarity of t e river corridor: the upstream migration of eels (,~n~l4~~~a anand trout (Sairno trutia) has about 10 years ago. with the bui ax ilicrS: submediterranean, ciiof the dam. Some carp ( Qprinus carpio) seem ax of Qtrerciolr ilkis, mixed with Qliercl4.spzrto remain in the reservoir. No peculiartty in ks~ens, in this case dominant; submontane amphibians and insects. climax of Quercion zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA prrhescenti- pelreae. River The urbanization of the two sma’ll towns has corridors: Poprt~etlJllz- Salicetzrin associations remained compacted around their old centers, (Tommaselli. i 973: ignatti, 1988 ). which show the same orientation. These towns Synthetic description of the vegetation along have a population of about 5 100 each. 207 c: ecotopes, 1987. Note the quite different distribution from Fig. 1C. The two hip&er classes of ecotope t-er less area today. aboue - 6%. zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Table 7 Variation ofecotope and 1987 Class subsystems per class of stability in I968 i 968 ha 1987 % ha % 3 C B K *A 98.7 I 144.8 444.0 497.0 308.7 4.0 45.9 17.8 20.0 12.3 146.2 855.2 726.3 288.7 476.9 6.0 34.5 29.0 1 I.5 19.0 Total 2493.3 100.0 2493.3 100.0 805.7 32.3 765.6 30.5 .A n plus E river system becomes visible and measurable in this area. The case study area (25 km2) covers the principal part of the Magazzolo River Basin north to the reservoir (40 km’) (Fig. 2). The This ;t l Jys;z could be summarized in three principal steps: (a) grain an landscape; i b) differences i ogeneity; (c ) cornposit: .n mosaic, today and ir. the recent past. zyxwvutsrqponmlkjih (a) Grain and porosity All the elements of the landscape patches) had been surveyed by orderi in four classes: less than 0.5 ha, 0.5- 1.O 2.0 ha, greater than 2.0 ha. The distri (i.e. Fig. 12. Network connectivity, today. On over 2 _y theoretically At least 30 to 36 new links need to hi restored. possible links. 5 1 ri~w corridors plus rcn v.xmdcd patches exist. ind 0 , 0 0PrIMuM zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA ENVELOPE _- ___ _ I 0 -. ---+-+--$~~ It L-l zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA 0’ 0 + 1++_..+ “____ b d, Ind. these spatial patterns itional human utilizations. of wooded and forested err (i.e. porosity), reprem a clear linkage with the inance (D): zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTS , 0.183. Regions of low Btc: AA, 0.133; BB, 0.303. (c)Lartdscapr mosaic The analysis of an ecotissue needs also to investigate the map of the distribution of the fkient convergence betwee: strustural tdee to understand this environmental and functional design. character of the landscape. Compare this figure with pose three indexes have (Turner, 1989), and biolog tc) defined on the basis of. ( I ) the f resistance stability, (2 ) the princiof ecosystems of the biosphere, and ( 3 ) their metaboiic data (biomass, gross prirespiration ) (Ingegnoli, mary production, 19912): Btc,=1/2 The ecological evaluation of the transformation pattern of the case study ecotissue needs some ecological indexes, to be applied on the landscape mosaic maps. To this pur- (a,+b,)=R, (Mcalm-‘year-‘) where. zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONML al= (R/GP)J(R/GP),,, and b,= (dS/ S),i,/ (dS/S), (R is respiration, GP is gross production, dS/S= R jB denote maintenance to structure ratio, i denotes principal ecosystems of the biosphere, S is entropy, B is biomass ) . Four tables were elaborated with the aim of studying the recent changes of the ecotissue, referring to the 1968 and 1987 local landscapes (Tables 2 and 4) and their comparison zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA loo0 900 @OS 700 602 SC3 40: ?OJ q-. ."I : 100 ’ 0 of a right landscape conxu-gcnw beturen str~~cture an Fig. 15. Change of the fractal dimension rcrerrcli w Ar: ;c;:wstion function. The \.ari;ltion of zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA fractal dimtznsion ( D) must hc mlnilnum. in order to maintain the ecological character of tf-le lands~apc. I :s I f I I I I i I I 1 1I I : 2ai I 1 ’ _I / BTC I, zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA -- _ BTC : 1 .I 1.2 Fig. 16. Gen eraI control gf the lscal landscape evolution. : see test ). 1.4 3 1 LOCAL ‘REGIONAL 1.6 1.5 FOREST r 1.: AREA in order to check the state transition ( i.e. its movement ) of the ecotiswe se reasons, it is intere~tin rincipal geomorpholog- ering methods, is capa- continuous distribution does not remain good enough, because no high stability ecotopes are present where the landscape structure is vanishing, especially in the central part af the ecotissue. In the absence of higher stability ecotopes, it is obvious that even normal disturbances (e.g. buffer zones between the river, its At this point vve met a new problem: urn requirements for co restoration, not only for economic reasons, but in order to avoid too great a change in the type of local landscape. It is thus necessary to conpropriate connections of t easure of the network co ity allows us to resolve the above-mentioned problem. Existing river corridors and wooded patches must be (Fig. 12) connected by suitable new links mainly in the clay areas. In over 265 theoretically possible links, there are 5 1 river corridors plus te wooded patches. The experience suggests at at least 30 to 36 new links have to be restored. For this purpose, in order to control the connectivity of the landscape, the construction of an optimum envelope plotted with the help of two indexes: index zyxwvutsrqpo 1 is a measure of linkages, and index 2 is a measure of circuitry of the graph (Fig. 13 ). The higher thresholds limit the change of the type of landscape, the lower ones avoid a negative circuitry. Today the connectivity value is completely outside the envelope; the minimum interven- C+onscqucnccs for I%otic Divcrslty and Ecologrcal Ffou s Spnngcr-Vcrlag Nch ‘I’ork. lngv~n~ll. t’., 1980, Ecologra c ProgettaJlonc. C‘I JSL. hl~lano. Ingcgnoll. c’., 199 la, Human zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXW Inc lwwx ITI landscape change. thresholds of mctastanlllt>. fn, 0 Rakcra f f-:ditor 1. ~-CTrcgtr1al and Aquatic Ecosystems, Ikrtllrbatron and orwood. NCM I’i)rE\ pp X13-3.19 99 1b. Ecologicsll PIannmg on Ab Lombard!: a Case Stud! from the East Magglorc, In: Procccdlngs of the European on Practical Landscape Ecolog>. Vol. 1: IAI zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA restore the clay zones ( Ingcpnoli, V., 1992, asi s,.wntifichc dell’cc g io c ’ ~113 im po rta wn tc o ruza c applicat 55(A): z?c>-4.3. efe ces ., 19S4. Ecologic dc la \‘t@tation Tcrrcstrc. Masson. Paris. llatwr. \I’.. 1990. l_~slng iandscapc ecology in planning and managcmcnt. In: IS. Zonncvtrd and R.T.T. For-man ( EdItors). Changing Landscapes: An Ecological Pmpccti\c. Springer-L’crlag, NW J’ork. Hansen. 4.J. and dl Castri. F.. 1992. handscapc Boundaries: iandscapc patterns. in: ‘M. h7-wand KG. Ga ito rs ). Quantitative Methods in Landscqx Ecology. Springer-Vcrlag,. NC\\ t’ork. Nak,eh. Z. arid Lxbcrman. A.S.. 1983. Landscape Ecslog:;: Theory and Application. Springer-Verlag. New York. xai i-ii. Z., i 9S7. Bioc~hernctic and rhrrmod~namic pmsprctives >f landscape fuxtinns and land use pattcms. Lz&sc. Ecol.. 1 (2 1: 72-83. Odum. E.P.. 1989. Ecology and our Endangered Life-Suppcrt S>fstcms. Sinaucr. Sucdcrland. M.4. 1992. G re a t Idt-as in Eculog> for the 19905. 2( 7 ): 5X-535. r‘ Qgclis. C.L.. N’a idc . J.B. and .Alkn. T.F. archical Concept of Ecos! stems. Princetan t_:ni\. Press, Princeton. Xl. Q’Neill. R.V.. Jonson. AR. and K&. .:.‘A’.. 1989. 19 chical frameuork for the analysis of scale. Landsc. Ecol., 3(3/W 193-205. Pignatti. S., 19b8. Ecofogia del pacsaggio. In: E. Hormsell. V. Giacomini. S. Pignatti. La sita dek piante. pp. 472-483. Prigogme. 1.. Nicolis, G. and BabPoyatz. A.. 1972. Thepa~.q&mamics of evolution. Phjs. Toda!. 2’; ( 11 1: 23-28. ( 12 ): 3S-4J. To m a sc iil. R.. 1973. La vegetazionc forcstale d’Eta Bla _ C o llana Verde. No. 32. Rome. Turner. M.G.. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst.. 89( 20): 17 l-1 97. Zonncnveld. 1.S. and Forman. R.T.T.. 1990. Changing Land- zyxwvutsr scapes: An Ecological Perspective. Springer-Verlag. New I’ork.