BEYOND THE POLIS
RITUALS, RITES AND CULTS
IN EARLY AND ARCHAIC GREECE
(12th‑6th CENTURIES BC)
Editor
CReA‑Patrimoine
© Centre de Recherches en Archéologie et Patrimoine (CReA‑Patrimoine)
Université libre de Bruxelles
50, av. F.D. Roosevelt | CP 133/01
B‑1050 Bruxelles
crea@ulb.ac.be
http://crea.ulb.ac.be
ISBN: 9782960202922
Printed by Snel
Layout: Nathalie Bloch (CReA‑Patrimoine)
Cover and separator pages
Reconstruction of the sanctuary of Despotiko by Woulielmos Orestides (Courtesy Yiannos Kouragios)
Études d’archéologie 15
Études d’archéologie 15
BEYOND THE POLIS
RITUALS, RITES AND CULTS
IN EARLY AND ARCHAIC GREECE
(12th‑6th CENTURIES BC)
Edited by
Irene S. Lemos and Athena Tsingarida
Bruxelles
CReA-Patrimoine
2019
CONTENTS
Acknowledgements
7
Irene Lemos & Athena Tsingarida
Introduction Proceedings
9
Irene Lemos & Athena Tsingarida
I. Theoritical Considerations on Ritual Practices
Rituals in Context. Scales and Horizons of Interpretation of Cult Places in Early Greece
15
17
François de Polignac
The Role of Sanctuaries and the Formation of Greek Identities in the Late Bronze Age / Early Iron Age Transition
25
Birgitta Eder
Entangled Religion, Ritual and Social Practice: the Case of Karphi
53
Mathew Haysom
II. Regional Cases I: Central Greece and the Peloponnese
Dedicatory Dialogues in North‑Central Greece: Pherai and Philia in Broader Context
65
67
Maria Mili
The “Ritual Zone” on Xeropolis at Lefkandi: Some Preliminary Thoughts
75
Irene S. Lemos
Terracotta Figurines from the “Ritual Zone” at Xeropolis‑Lefkandi: Constructing a Methodology
91
Caroline Thurston
Invention of Tradition in Cult and Myth at Eleusis
99
Floris van den Eijden
Dining with the Ancestors: the Late Archaic‑Classical Westkomplex in Aegina‑Kolonna
115
Gudrun Klebinder‑Gauss
Enduring Rituals in the Arcadian Mountains: the Case of the Sanctuary of Zeus at Mt. Lykaion
Mary Voyatzis
III. Regional Cases II: The Aegean and Western Greece
Artemis Beyond the Polis of Thasos: the Cult of the Goddess in the Archaic North‑Eastern Aegean
133
147
149
Ioannis (Yangos) Chalazonitis
Ritual Practices in Abandoned Settlements in the Cyclades from the 12th to the 6th Century BC:
Human Mobility and its Impact on Ritual Practices
171
Irène Sanchez
Geometric Despotiko: on the Borderline between Sacred and Profane
193
Alexandra Alexandridou
5
No more Gap, but New Social Practices: Evidence of Collective Funerary Rituals in Itanos
during the 6th and 5th Centuries BC
213
Athena Tsingarida & Didier Viviers
Funerary Practices and the Formation of the Polis at Megara Hyblaea 8th‑6th centuries BC
Reine‑Marie Bérard
IV. Bioarchaeological Approaches to Ritual Practices
Ritualizing the sea: aspects of ritual activities related to the sea in the Aegean
from the 12th century to the 6th century BC
247
259
261
Tatiana Theodoropoulou
A preliminary examination of Lefkandi’s “ritual” area from a zooarchaeological perspective
273
Alex Mulhall
An exploration of the social role of plants in rituals in prehistoric Aegean
with reference to the site of Xeropolis, Lefkandi, Euboea
289
Alexandra Livarda & Georgia Kotzamani
Contributors
6
303
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Irene S . L emo s & Athe n a Tsin ga rid a
The volume presents the proceedings of the international symposium, “Beyond the Polis. Ritual Practices
in Early and Archaic Greece” held at the Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB) and at the Royal Academy of
Belgium in September 2015. The conference was organized by the editors, Athena Tsingarida (ULB) and Irene
Lemos (Oxford), and was made possible thanks to the generous funding by the Foundation Philippe Wiener ‑
Maurice Anspach. Within the framework of the research program “Beyond the polis”, the Foundation extended
our funding for another year in order to organize the conference. During the preparation of the publication,
we further benefited from the constant support of Merton College in Oxford and the CReA‑Patrimoine
in Brussels.
We owe special thanks to Drs. Alex Vacek, Vivi Saripanidi and Jean Vanden Broeck‑Parant for their help
in organizing the conference. Special thanks are due to Yiannos Kouragios who granted permission to use
the reconstruction of the sanctuary of Despotikos (Cyclades) for the cover of the book, produced by his
collaborator Woulielmos Orestiades. We are also grateful to a number of scholars who peer reviewed the
papers. Our task as editors was facilitated greatly by the skills and expertise of Nathalie Bloch, infographist at
the CReA‑Patrimoine, and the help of Antoine Attout (PhD candidate and Assistant in Classical Archaeology
at ULB).
7
INTRODUCTION PROCEEDINGS
Irene L em os & Athe n a Tsin ga rid a
This peer reviewed volume is the proceedings of
an international conference and the sequel to the
publication of the research that resulted from a
three‑year joint project between the University of
Oxford and the Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB),
initially entitled “Beyond the polis. Ritual practices
and the construction of social identities in Early and
Archaic Greece (12th‑6th centuries BC)”. Published
in 2017 and edited by Athena Tsingarida and Irene
Lemos, Constructing Social Identities in Early Iron
Age and Archaic Greece presents the results of the
research completed by three scholars during their
post‑doctoral positions awarded within the frame of
the joint project. Vicky Vlachou presented the paper
“From Mycenaean Cult Practice to the Hyakinthia
Festival of the Spartan Polis. Cult Images, Textiles
and Ritual Activity at Amykles: An Archaeological
Perspective”; Alexandra Alexandridou published her
research on “’Sacred’ or Profane? Interpreting Late
Geometric Edifices in proximity to Burials in Attica”;
and finally Vivi Saripanidi submitted her research
on “Constructing Continuities with a ‘Heroic’ Past:
Death, Feasting and Political Ideology in the Archaic
Macedonian Kingdom”.
This volume presents the proceedings of the
international conference that took place in Brussels
in 2015. It was organized to offer complementary
approaches, both thematic and geographic, to
the study of Early Greek ritual practices and to
expand into other areas, contexts, and materials
the research undertaken in the volume Constructing
Social Identities in Early Iron Age and Archaic Greece.
The conference included papers on theoretical
approaches to the study of rituals, case studies from a
number of regions and sites, and finally papers on the
contribution of bio‑archaeological research to our
understanding of ritual practices in ancient Greece.
Section I includes papers related to the theoretical
approaches. They address important questions of
wider perspectives such as the role of cult and ritual in
constructing social identities through multi‑levelled
perspectives, often beneath or beyond the polis; the
continuity in cult and ritual from the Mycenaean
period to the 8th century BC; the challenging
methodological issue about the definition of the terms
“ritual” and “religion”; and finally the identification/
reconstruction of such practices from archaeological
evidence.
François de Polignac introduces the subject of the
conference, and discusses several cases that illustrate
ritual connections, which function in the context of
“beyond the polis”. Case studies of sanctuaries are
selected that are located outside the “city” and cover
different periods and geographical areas. The paper
studies the evolution of social and collective identities
negotiated through participation in the cults with
a special focus on the sanctuary of Amphiaraos at
Oropos (Classical period), the sanctuary of Apollo
of Abas at Kalapodi in Phokis (from the Mycenaean
period onwards) and that of Apollo Ptoios in Boeotia
(from the Late Geometric period onwards). In his
paper, de Polignac emphasizes the need to define
better the different horizons, levels and contexts
where the cults have been performed – city, regional,
interregional centered – during different stages of
their history or sometimes concurrently. The study
cases further suggest that the relation between
cities and sanctuaries offers a wide spectrum of
interactions: from the city in an ancillary position,
providing services for a cult that it does not control,
to the complete control of a sanctuary by the city.
De Polignac extends the discussion to other key
sanctuaries and raises the question whether our neat
categories of cults can still satisfy the multi‑level
functions of the sanctuaries during their long period
of use.
In her paper, Birgitta Eder offers a comprehensive
account of the religious geography of shrines and cult
places from the Mycenaean period to the 8th century
BC. She organizes the evidence according to the three
main chronological stages (Palatial, Postpalatial and
Early Iron Age). She further considers the location of
ritual performances in palaces, in settlements and in
the countryside. She also examines their architectural
plans and accessibility. The impressive number and
variety of cult locations reveal a clear shift in their
character from the Late Bronze to the Early Iron Age
that resulted in changes to their setting, architectural
9
Irene Lemos & Athena Tsingarida
details and offerings. The paper demonstrates the
significance of religious and cult practices in the
development of regional and supra‑regional identities
in the early Greek communities. It supports the
idea, already suggested by C. Sourvinou‑Inwood,1
that early Greek sanctuaries developed through a
continuous process and without any break during
the Dark Ages.
In his paper, Mathew Haysom raises the important
and difficult methodological question considering
the definition of the terms “rituals” and “religion”,
and their identification in the archaeological record
for both the Aegean prehistory and the Classical
period. Browsing through archaeological and
anthropological literature on the subject, Haysom
acknowledges the contribution of G. Geertz which
links ritual and religion.2 In order to validate it,
Haysom applies this particular methodological
framework to the 12th‑century settlement at Karphi
in Crete. In doing so, the paper demonstrates that
building on Geerz’s framework allows us to recognize
the complex patterns of interaction between religion
and ritual embedded in everyday life and functioning
both in the religious and social spheres.
Sections II and III present regional cases from a
variety of sites that date from the Mycenaean to the
Archaic periods. In these sections, a number of papers
present new and unpublished material (Xeropolis
at Lefkandi, Despotiko), while others offer new
approaches to the study of old material (Thessaly,
Eleusis, the Cyclades) or new results from on‑going
excavations (Lykaion, Itanos, Kolonna Aigina).
Maria Mili examines the two Thessalian sanctuaries
of Athena Itonia at Philia and Ennodia at Pherai that
played a significant role in constructing Thessalian
identity in the Early Iron Age. Mili offers comparisons
between them and other sanctuaries of Geometric
and Archaic Greece. She notes that scholars often
employ votive records to answer questions related
to social identities, and also argues that comparing
votive assemblages is an important methodological
step to understanding state formation processes.
Mili’s analysis shows, as noted also by de Polignac
in his introductory paper, that sanctuaries could
serve many different levels of local, regional and
super regional “cultic” networks, and she suggests
that materialization of the different levels could have
1
2
10
Sourvinou‑Inwood 1993, 1‑17.
Geertz 1973, 87 ‑125.
varied through time. Finally she concludes that 8th
‑century sanctuaries in Thessaly such as at Pherai and
Philia, as well as elsewhere in the Greek world, were
operating in close dialogue with each other and that
developments perceived at one were closely followed
by others.
Irene Lemos offers a preliminary report of the
discoveries made at the “Ritual Zone” on Xeropolis
at Lefkandi, Euboea. Three structures discovered
on the site were equipped with clay drums and
platforms, and might have served for gatherings
where display and consumption of food were the
main ritual activities. Two of the structures are dated
to the 12th century while the third dates from the
12th to the 10th centuries BC. Moreover, detailed
comparisons are offered with similar platforms
and associated assemblages of ceramics, figurines
and animal bones found in funerary, domestic and
cult contexts from the Postpalatial to the Archaic
periods. It is also argued that the gatherings at the
“Ritual Zone” served to shape and enhance the
communal identities of the PostPalatial population
at Lefkandi. Furthermore, it is tempting to suggest
that such occasions could be compared to the later
trapezomata where portions of food were presented
and offered also to the gods. In any case, the new
finds on Xeropolis provide fresh evidence for ritual
activities that took place during the PostPalatial and
early Greek periods. Further research at the site will
provide more needed information on the nature of
such activities and their significance.
Complementary to this chapter is that of Caroline
Thurston who presents the figurines discovered in the
“Ritual Zone”. In the last section of the proceedings,
additional information about this area is offered
by the analyses of bio‑archaeological evidence (by
Livarda and Kotzamani; Mulhall; Theodoropoulou).
Thurston tests whether the discovery of terracotta
figurines in this particular archaeological context
could assist with its association and identification
as an area dedicated to ritual practices. Moreover,
she examines the significant characteristics of the
particular assemblage of figurines found in the “Ritual
Zone” in order to understand their role in ritual
activities. Her analysis highlights two specific factors:
the presence of types not common in other contexts
and their repeated usage. Especially interesting is
the number of boat models and the monochrome
bovid figurines discovered in this particular part of
the settlement. Another important factor is the high
density of their deposition. She concludes that the
Introduction Proceedings
assemblage at the “Ritual Zone” suggests that the
figurines found there served a specific “votive habit”.
In his paper, Floris Van den Eijnde re‑examines the
archaeological evidence of the successive activities
that took place on the site of the Telesterion in Eleusis
from the final stages of the Late Bronze Age to the
middle of the 5th century BC. He focuses especially
on the Late Helladic building ‑ “Building B” ‑ which
was found underneath the Classical Telesterion. The
author explores Cosmopoulos’ idea of this building
as a lieu de mémoire3 and takes into account both
the archaeological remains and the literary evidence
to point to a ritual continuity, and to suggest a
reconstruction of the site and the performances that
took place there. While previous studies demonstrated
that the building was in use until the Sub‑Mycenaean
period, this paper suggests that it was still visible
during the Geometric period, and was most probably
partly in use until the early years of the 6th century.
Indeed, in this later period the existing terrace was
enlarged and elevated, while the remains of the earlier
building were covered with backfill to allow for the
construction of the “Solonian” Telesterion. Floris Van
den Eijnde finally suggests that the visible remains
of “Building B” fulfilled a commemorative function,
which was also employed to shape a common
identity for the local population which, according
to the archaeological record, established its presence
at the site in the Protogeometric period. Van den
Eijnde also draws parallels between the foundation
myths of the Eleusian and Athenian cults, the former
described in the Hymn of Demeter, the latter in
the Iliad (2.546‑549) and the Odyssey (7.80‑81),
to show that the cults developed at the same time
to manifest two independent polities – Athens and
Eleusis – which were in fierce competition with each
other during the 8th and 7th centuries BC.
In her contribution, Gudrun Klebinder‑Gauss
discusses the function of a building complex, the
so‑called “Westkomplex” located at the western end
of the rocky promontory of Kolonna, on Aegina. The
paper focuses on the assumed interpretation of the
“Westkomplex”, erected in the Late Archaic – Early
Classical period, as a location dedicated to dining
and worshiping ancestors and/or heroes. She argues
that the “Westkomplex” served as a setting where
collective activities took place forming shared
identities related to kinship‑based groups. The paper
further addresses the issue of a possible continuity in
the practice of rituals at the site from the Geometric
3
period onwards when the area was a burial ground,
and later when, in the first half of the 6th century,
ritual and sympotic activities took place next to two
earlier grave markers that remained visible until the
turn of the century when eventually the area was
dedicated to the “Westkomplex”.
Mary Voyatzis reports on the recent discoveries
made at the sanctuary of Zeus on Mt. Lykaion, in
the Arcadian mountains, founded well “beyond”
any polis of early Greece. Particularly impressive
are the discoveries made on the altar of Zeus where
ritual practices involving the offering of burnt
animal sacrifices and libations, that started in the
Mycenaean period, continued into the Early Iron
Age and beyond. The finds include a lot of pottery,
mostly from drinking vessels, terracotta and metal
figurines and other offerings found together with
the burnt animal bones. What is important is that
the deposition of animal bones dates from the
16th to the 14th centuries BC. This is without
doubt a clear case of animal sacrifice starting in the
Mycenaean period and continuing into later periods.
Petrographic and chemical analyses of the pottery
revealed that the coarser, handmade pottery, from
the Final Neolithic and the Middle Helladic periods,
was mostly produced from local clays, while Late
Helladic and especially Early Iron Age ceramics
belong to fabric groups of clay sources derived from
further away. Voyatzis suggests that “local” people
visited the sanctuary in prehistoric times, but later
in the Late Bronze and Early Iron Ages there were
connections with other regions, and especially
with Messenia and Laconia. In the final part of the
paper, Voyatzis compares the cult of Zeus at Lykaion
with that at Olympia noticing that the former was
of much earlier date, and thus suggesting that the
important shrine at Mt. Lykaion might have inspired
aspects of the formation of the sanctuary of Zeus at
Olympia. One important aspect might have been the
assimilation of significant components of the cult
such as the creation of an ash altar in the shape of
a mountain. In any case, evidence on Mt. Lykaion
reveals enduring practices, which served to reinforce
membership of social and cultural identities from the
Bronze to the Iron Age. It is suggested that collective
memory might have played a role in the various
aspects of the continuity of such cult activities on this
important mountaintop shrine even when different
and new social identities were emerging in the Early
Iron Age, which eventually set the foundations for
the articulation of political, religious and social
institutions of Archaic and Classical Greece.
Cosmopoulos 2015, 160 ‑166.
11
Irene Lemos & Athena Tsingarida
Section III, “Regional Cases II: The Aegean and
Western Greece” presents articles which discuss
cases from the Aegean and Crete, Northern Greece
and from the Western colonial world. It offers
different archaeological contexts and assemblages,
from sanctuaries, settlements and burials in order
to understand how material culture can be activated
to build new identities in culturally mixed areas
(Northern Aegean and Megara Hyblaea) or to refer
to a common constructed past.
It opens with a paper by Yangos Chalazonitis which
focuses on the sanctuary of Artemis in Thasos in the
late 7th and 6th centuries. The article examines the
material from the site, the emergence of the cult, the
ritual practices and the importance of the Artemis cult
in the island. In a further step, Chalazonitis places the
sanctuary in a wider regional context, and compares
it with material evidence from other contemporary
Artemisia or Artemis‑like sanctuaries located near
Thasos, along the coast of the modern‑day Gulf of
Kavala. A special emphasis is laid on the sanctuary
of Artemis Parthenos in Neapolis and the Acropolis’
sanctuary in Oisyne. The paper demonstrates that
the cults in Neapolis and Oisyme to a certain extent
evolved in tandem with the Thasian cult of Artemis.
But it also suggests that they exhibited distinctive
elements in votive and cult practices, which served to
form new social and civic identities.
In her contribution, Irene Sanchez examines ritual
practices performed in abandoned settlements
in the Cyclades. She discusses mobility patterns
and shifting social identities from individuals and
groups on the move from the Late Bronze Age to
the Archaic period. The author points to the large
extent of abandonment processes which took part
in the Cyclades, and reviews archaeological evidence
in order to provide an overview of the practices
adopted by various groups throughout different sites
and periods. The paper suggests that small groups of
people continued to worship at abandoned sites after
the Late Helladic IIIC period. It also suggests there
is a marked difference between rituals performed in
the PostPalatial and Early Iron Age periods and those
which took place from the end of the Geometric
period onwards. The former may be difficult to trace
and were most probably carried out in abandoned
settlements by individuals or small groups of
devotees, whereas the latter were also performed in
abandonment settlements but which underwent
substantial reorganisation that was most probably
coordinated by the whole community.
12
In the light of recent excavations and on‑going
research, Alexandra Alexandridou proposes a
reconstruction of the early stages of occupation at
the site on the islet of Despotiko (in the Cyclades),
which became an important sanctuary dedicated to
Apollo in the second half of the 6th century BC. In
order to understand the nature of the Early Iron Age
occupation, the author examines the function of two
partly preserved buildings, Buildings O and Ξ, the
former erected in the late 9th ‑ early 8th century and
the latter in the late 8th century BC. The paper points
to an extensive occupation of the area from the late
9th century and, in particular, the 8th century BC.
It further proposes that Building O was a residential
structure, housing feasting activities, while the later
Building Ξ was a place destined for commensality
in a cultic context. Alexandridou proposes that the
early occupation of the site was an intermediary
stage between the profane and the sacred, combining
domestic dwellings and structures dedicated to cultic
activities.
In their paper, Athena Tsingarida and Didier Viviers
discuss the nature of the successive occupations from
the late 8th to the middle of the 4th centuries BC in
the area of the so‑called Archaic building complex,
located in the North Necropolis of Itanos (East
Crete). In the light of recent excavations, the authors
explore the evidence of collective practices that took
place in this prominent funerary zone during the 6th
and 5th centuries BC, a period during which there
is a lack of significant funerary evidence from Crete.
It is important also to note that the site was located
on the top of earlier burial grounds. Excavations
showed that earlier funerary enclosure walls were
used as foundations to build the late 7th ‑ early 6th
century building complex, where collective feasting,
sacrificial pyrai together with other ritual ceremonies
were performed both inside the hearth room and
in the open‑air yards. These activities were closely
related to two earlier pit tombs, enclosed within
the building. Two clay benches were built in front
of them to receive offerings and a pavement made
of large slabs surrounded the pits. This indicates
that significant importance was given to the two
pit tombs when the complex was erected in the 6th
century. The study points to a long‑term ritual use of
the area, linked with the pit tombs until the middle
of the 4th century BC, even after the destruction and
abandonment of a large part of the complex in the
early 5th. The importance of the area in the local
funerary ideology and landscape is further attested
by the preservation of the abandoned zone next to
the numerous Late Classical and Hellenistic burials
Introduction Proceedings
located in its proximity. The building complex and
its successive occupations suggest a continuity of
rituals linked with earlier tombs during a period
when there is no evidence of burials in the Northern
Necropolis of Itanos (6th ‑ mid 4th century). The
authors propose to relate these practices with
corporate groups, probably linked by kinship ties,
who founded a tomb cult where several rituals took
place (feasting, drinking, sacrifices etc.) in order to
construct a collective memory which strengthened
their social cohesion at a time when Cretan society
was confronted with important institutional and
cultural challenges.
The contribution of Reine‑Marie Bérard discusses
the material assemblage found in a significant
number of graves from the Southern and Western
necropoleis of Megara Hyblaea. The author employs
the information that funerary rites reveal about
individual and collective ceremonies in order to form
the social identities of the community. Following
the highly symbolic self‑representation of the
community in burial customs, the article raises issues
directly relevant to Greek colonial contexts such as
the possible influence of an ethnic mix context in
the formation of the colonial identity in the archaic
polis of Megara Hyblaea. Moreover, evidence of the
funeral display of children and indigenous women
are also discussed. The study further points to the
absence of ostentatious representation of social status
or hierarchy, while it suggests that the funerary
“space” was collectively managed. Such processes at
Megara can be compared with other “colonial” sites
and might, therefore, reflect a collective aspiration
in the organisation of the funerary, domestic and
public spaces.
Recent literature has highlighted the importance
of archaeobotanical and archaeozoological remains
as complementary sources for ritual practices.4
Section IV takes into account the two main
categories of paleoenvironmental evidence: botanical
and zoological remains. The first paper discusses the
range of possible roles of marine animals in ritual
activities, while the two other articles present case
studies from concrete examples with a special focus
on the site of Lefkandi.
Tatiana Theodoropoulou explores the presence of
the marine world in cult activities. She underlines
that it is indeed recent research that has enriched
our understanding of the role of marine animals
4
For instance, Ekroth and Wallensten 2013.
in Greek religion. Her contribution offers a study
of marine animals and raw materials of marine
origin associated with cult activities by employing
a selection of faunal assemblages covering contexts
from settlements, sanctuaries and cemeteries in the
Aegean during the Early Iron Age. The study offers
important insights into the ritual embodiment of
the sea during this period. Theodoropoulou argues
that as communities consumed marine foodstuffs in
their diet, the significance that they assigned to the
sea and its creatures remains unclear, and it is only
zooarchaeological research that can be employed to
explore the significance of the sea and its animals
in ritual contexts. Theodoropoulou presents a
number of case studies of important sanctuaries
where marine animals have been found, such as the
sanctuary in Kommos in Crete, the sanctuary of
Artemis Kithone at Miletus, the sanctuary of Apollo
and Artemis on Kynthos, and elsewhere. It is also
noted that to be certain of the ritual consumption
of marine foodstuffs, we must combine secure cult
contexts with zooarchaeological criteria such as the
abundance of the marine foodstuff and the selection
of particular species. One additional constraint,
however, for this particular period is the non‑
institutionalised character of practices that often
were not part of discrete spheres of ritual activities
but were embedded in everyday life.
Finally, there is an account of the marine remains
found in the “Ritual Zone” on Xeropolis at Lefkandi
that confirms the above statements. A large amount
of marine animal remains have been found in the
area inside and outside the structures, confirming
that this was an area where consumption of food took
place. Interestingly, however, the species found there
are identical to other “non‑special” contexts, which
is also the case with the other bioarchaeological
remains found in the area. Other evidence of marine
remains from funerary contexts is also included in
the discussion with specific references to the burial
ground at Toumba in Lefkandi. The paper concludes
that marine resources were used for both everyday
and ritual consumption, and that variability of species
and function is a feature of the marine assemblages
discovered in domestic, ritual and funerary contexts
of Early Iron Age Greece.
Alex Mulhall presents a preliminary report of the
faunal remains found in the “Ritual Zone” on
Xeropolis at Lefkandi. Mulhall has examined some
168 archaeological units from the area in order
to identify not only any broad patterns, but also
specific features at a specimen level that might be
13
Irene Lemos & Athena Tsingarida
correlated with ritual practices. Another aim was
to compare and contrast the area’s faunal material
with that deposited in apparently domestic contexts
elsewhere on Xeropolis. The study has shown that
there are strong similarities between the animal
bones discovered in the “Ritual Zone” and the large
volume deposited in the rest of the excavated areas
on Xeropolis. This indicates that any ritual activities
that took place in the “Ritual Zone” were restrained
by the dominant systems of socio‑economic
practices at Lefkandi’s agropastoral community.
Exceptional is the discovery of one lion bone that
raises interesting questions with regards to whether
the animal was a local inhabitant. Important also is
the significance of the specimen, which is a “meat
bearing” right distal humerus that also has several
butchery marks. Equally important is the discussion
considering evidence for a diachronic change in
human behaviour and the differential preservation
of the zooarchaeological remains discovered in the
“Ritual Zone”. Mulhall’s cautious approach based on
the assumption that the pilot sub‑sample could be
considered representative, allows further important
observations. In conclusion, Mulhall argues that the
faunal remains from the “Ritual Zone” reveal aspects
of behaviour which could be associated with ritual
activities. This preliminary study complements those
of the papers by Lemos, Thurston, Theodoropoulou,
and Livarda and Kotzamani.
Alexandra Livarda and Georgia Kotzamani explore
the social role of plants in rituals and provide a
very useful summary of the evidence available so
far. A number of available studies are presented
deriving from sites where organic remains have been
systematically sampled. They also discuss remains
from excavations conducted without controlled
archaeobotanical procedures, such as flotation and
targeted soil sampling. Their survey starts with the
Early Neolithic period with plant material associated
with burials and also covers later periods, where
available evidence reveals the presence of plants and
especially olives in the retrieved bio‑archaeological
evidence. Livarda and Kotzamani, however, noted
that the absence of controlled sampling methods from
earlier excavations challenges the sound association
of olives with the funerary context as more recently
conducted analyses suggest the presence of a variety
of food and other plants in the burial grounds
examined. In the last part of their contribution, the
authors present some preliminary results of analyses
undertaken at the “Ritual Zone” on Xeropolis.
Some 92 samples were selected for analysis of the
plant remains from contexts associated with the
14
three Structures discovered on the site. Livarda and
Kotzamani present their analysis of the plant remains
from each structure followed by comparisons with the
domestic contexts of the site. They note that the main
food plants encountered across Xeropolis were also
identified in the “Ritual Zone” but some differences
did exist. For example there is a broader range of
cereals, legumes and fruit found across the domestic
contexts of the settlement. There are also some
interesting observations that though the majority of
the plants found in the “Ritual Zone” were also found
in the domestic quarters, free threshing wheat and
coriander have not been identified in the rest of the
site. Interestingly, threshing wheat has been found
at the sanctuary of Zeus on Mt. Lykaion and at the
sanctuary of Kalapodi in Phokis. Equally significant
is the potential presence of coriander which has only
been found in the “Ritual Zone”. The presence of
aromatic plants may reflect their use in burning rites
to achieve some sensory effect.
The present volume offers a variety of papers
presenting the results of recent research into ritual
practices attested from the Late Bronze Age to the
end of the Archaic period. The objective was to bring
together specialists working in different regions of the
Greek world and in different fields such as history,
archaeology and bio‑archaeology. We hope that the
result will benefit colleagues and students studying
not only the religious but also the social and cultural
institutions of Early Greece.
Bibliography
Cosmopoulos 2015 = M.B. Cosmopoulos, Bronze
Age Eleusis and the Origins of the Eleusinian Mysteries,
Cambridge, 2015.
Ekroth and Wallensten 2013 = G. Ekroth, J.
Wallensten (eds.), Bones, Behaviour and Belief. The
zooarchaeological evidence as a source for ritual practice
in ancient Greece and beyond, Stockholm, 2013.
Geertz 1973 = C. Geertz, “Religion as a cultural
system”, in: C. Geertz, The Interpretation of Cultures,
New York 1973, 87‑135.
Sourvinou‑Inwood 1993 = Chr. Sourvinou‑
Inwood, “Early sanctuaries, the Eighth Century
and Ritual Space. Fragments of a discourse”, in: N.
Marinatos and R. Hägg (eds), Greek Sanctuaries:
New Approaches, London and New York, 1993, 1‑17.