SKRIFTER UTGIVNA AV SVENSKA INSTITUTET I ATHEN, 8°, 21
ACTA INSTITUTI ATHENIENSIS REGNI SUECIAE, SERIES IN 8°, 21
Current approaches
to religion in ancient
Greece
Papers presented
at a symposium at the
Swedish Institute at Athens,
17–19 April 2008
Edited by Matthew Haysom
& Jenny Wallensten
STOCKHOLM 2011
THE PERFORMATIVE ASPECT OF GREEK RITUAL •OLIVER PILZ • 151
OLIVER PILZ
The performative aspect of Greek ritual
THE CASE OF THE ATHENIAN OSCHOPHORIA
Abstract*
Although concepts of performance theory were successfully applied to the study of rituals in the social sciences, research on ancient Greek ritual practice was not
afected by such approaches to any signiicant degree.
To a large extent, this might be due to the fragmentary
character of the available evidence, consisting mainly
of material remains of ritual activities in the archaeological record, and representations of rituals in art. In
the absence of detailed descriptions of ritual practice in
literary sources, it is therefore diicult to reconstruct
whole ritual sequences, which would greatly facilitate
their interpretation as performative acts. Criticizing a
view of ritual as primarily non-verbal and action orientated, this paper emphasizes the role of speech in Greek
rituals and examines some of the evidence for mimetic
and narrative ritual performances. Drawing on the example of the Athenian Oschophoria, the performative
aspect of a speciic ritual is investigated. In addition,
the simpliied interpretation of the Oschophoria as an
“ephebes’ rite” is dismissed in favour of a more balanced
reading that adequately considers not only the eminent
agricultural aspect of the festival but also the diferent
groups of participants.
* I would like to thank Athena Kavoulaki and Renaud Gagné for their comments during the conference
as well as Chikako Sugawara for information about the
san-san-kudo ritual. Furthermore, I am grateful to Uta
Kron and Klaus Junker for reading and commenting on
earlier drats of this paper. All errors, of course, remain
my own. I owe particular thanks to Caitlin D. Verfenstein and Lisa Yager for correcting and improving my
English text.
“Ritual studies” is a relatively new ield of research involving several disciplines of the social
sciences and humanities, including anthropology, sociology, psychology, communication
studies, history, linguistics and religious studies.1 As a category in its own right, ritual indeed
deserves a distinct interdisciplinary approach.
However, the emergence of ritual studies as an
independent discipline has contributed to the
considerable expansion that the meaning of the
term “ritual” has undergone over the last few
decades. Originally conined to the religious
sphere, the concept has subsequently been extended to include secular ceremonies and even
daily routine behaviour. It is here, however,
that the risk of a complete dissolution of the
concept lies. If ritual is reduced to its repetitive
aspect, then even brushing one’s teeth could be
considered a ritual activity. Since it is obvious
that the notion loses all analytical value and
becomes meaningless in this sense, more precise criteria are needed to discern ritual from
everyday behaviour. A performative approach,
emphasizing the staged aspect rather than the
formalized and rigid character of ritual action,
has proven useful in the attempt to establish
these criteria.
1
For the historical development of the term “ritual”,
see Bremmer 1998, 14–24.
152 • OLIVER PILZ • THE PERFORMATIVE ASPECT OF GREEK RITUAL
It was actually the ield of cultural anthropology that irst contributed to the theoretical
understanding of ritual. Ritual theories proposed by Victor Turner and Cliford Geertz
have been extremely inluential even beyond
the limits of their own discipline.2 Both scholars emphasized the transformative power of ritual, which is produced by a symbolic representation of cultural and social values. In the mid
1950s, the anthropologist Milton Singer proposed the concept of “cultural performance” as
a unit of reference for events such as plays, concerts, prayers, rituals and festivals.3 According
to Singer, in cultural performances, the beliefs
and values central to a culture are displayed
through the use of various media such as acting, dancing and singing. Furthermore, Singer
assumed that cultural performances reveal such
values and beliefs more explicitly than other,
non-performative contexts within that same
culture. Elaborating on Singer’s ideas, scholars
such as the sociologist Erving Gofman, the
cultural anthropologist Victor Turner and the
theatre director Richard Schechner gradually
expanded the concept into what is known today as performance theory.4
Victor Turner, in particular, applied the
performative approach to the study of ritual.
According to Turner, ritual is a “… transformative performance revealing major classiications, categories and contradictions of cultural
processes”.5 In this deinition, the two essential
aspects of Turner’s theory—the transformative
power of ritual as well as the concept of ritual
as staged performance—are combined. he
latter is, furthermore, clearly inherent in the
drama analogy frequently used by Turner with
regard to ritual. Although Turner recognized,
especially in his later writings, the aspect of enactment and role-playing in ritual activity, his
2
3
4
5
Turner 1969; Geertz 1973.
Singer 1955.
Cf. Fischer-Lichte 2003, esp. 37–41; Grimes 2006.
Turner 1986, 75.
theory of ritual revolves around the symbolic
structure of ritual action. Considering ritual an
instrument that channels and mediates endemic social conlicts, Turner primarily focused on
decoding the symbolic meaning of ritual sequences.
In the philosophy of language and linguistics, particularly within the framework of
speech act theory, the term “performance” has
a limited meaning. In speech act theory, “performance”, in a general sense, refers to the act
of producing an utterance. A more signiicant
application of the term, however, is comprised
in the notion “performative utterance”, introduced by John Austin in his famous 1955
Harvard lecture series, subsequently published
under the title How to do things with words.6
In contrast to utterances that describe or state
something, Austin deined performative utterances as acts of doing something by saying
something. Austin’s example par excellence for a
performative utterance is the case of a minister
who joins two people in marriage by saying, “I
now pronounce you husband and wife”. Subsequently, John Searle described the relation between these two meanings as follows, “hough
every utterance is indeed a performance, only a
very restricted class are performatives”.7 With
regard to ritual action, Stanley Tambiah rightly
noticed that ritual can be regarded as performative in three distinct senses: in the Austinian
sense of doing some conventional act by saying something; in the quite diferent sense of
a staged performance, and in the third sense of
the indexical values the actors attach to, or derive from, the performance.8
heories current in cultural anthropology
have rarely afected the interpretation of the
meaning and function of ancient Greek rituals
to any signiicant degree. One of the reasons
6
7
8
Austin 1962. Cf. Searle 1969.
Searle 1989, 536.
Tambiah 1979, 119.
THE PERFORMATIVE ASPECT OF GREEK RITUAL •OLIVER PILZ • 153
for this might be due to the dissimilar character
of the available evidence. Since direct observation of rituals is a privilege of the empirical social sciences, the best that Classical scholars can
do is to study the preserved regulations for, and
descriptions of, rituals in literary sources as well
as their physical remains in the archaeological
record.9 All previous scholarship suggests to
me that the way in which Classical scholars
conceptualize ritual is frequently shaped by the
notably fragmentary nature of the available evidence in their specialized area of study. In a recent lecture, Walter Burkert illustrated his conception of ritual with an interesting example
from personal observation. Since this passage
very clearly reveals Burkert’s perspective on
ritual, I will present a full quotation here from
the English translation of his lecture published
in the volume Ritual and communication in the
Graeco-Roman World:
“When, as I was recently able to observe at a
wedding in a temple in Japan, a festively dressed
maiden quite carefully pours liquid out of a
pitcher into a cup, three times, alternately for
the bride and the groom, and these latter then
equally carefully and pointedly drink, each
twice, from this cup, then that is a ritual, a
schematised action meant as a message. I have
mentioned this example because it shows how
rituals are recognisable independently of any
language: I know absolutely no Japanese, but I
do believe that I have understood the ceremony
to some extent.”10
Burkert explicitly conceives of ritual as a sequence of formalized bodily actions performed
in order to transmit a message. In a social context, he therefore considers ritual to be a means
of non-verbal communication that is, at least
9
In a broader sense, the latter category also includes
the preserved representations of rituals in art.
10
Burkert 2006, 23.
partially, analogous to language.11 To prevent
any misunderstanding, Burkert is careful not
to deny the existence of speech in ritual, but
he seems to conceive of verbal utterances and
bodily movements as two largely independent
and unrelated facets of ritual action. Admittedly, Burkert has chosen an example that its
extremely well with his vision. he “message”
of the san-san-kudo ritual, a rite of the Shinto
wedding ceremony, seems obvious: the couple
is now married. Since speech is absent from this
pouring and drinking ritual, understanding the
“message” does not depend on language, nor
does it have to do with the speciic actions performed in the rite. In fact, it could be argued
that Burkert was able to “… have understood
the ceremony to some extent …” because of a
rather simple analogy to Western culture. A
ritual centred on a young couple would probably have been recognizable as a wedding to a
Japanese observer in Europe as well.
Despite the limitation on the bodily aspect
of ritual activity, Burkert’s view has been quite
inluential among Classical scholars. Katharina Waldner, for instance, equally stresses the
“Sprachlosigkeit” of rituals, deining them as
purely physical activity.12 Describing polis religion as a system that consists of both mythological discourse and ritual action,13 Waldner
assigns speech to the discursive part, eliminating it from ritual action. In this context,
she refers not only to Burkert but also to the
late Catherine Bell’s practice theory approach
to ritual. According to Bell, the avoidance of
explicit speech and narrative is a distinctive
characteristic of ritualization.14 Moreover, Bell
11
Cf. Burkert 1983, 150.
Waldner 2000, 23f.
13
Waldner 2000, 21: “... ein System von sprachlichen
Diskursen einerseits und kultischen Handlungen andererseits …”.
14
Bell 1992, 94–98, 111. Cf. Bell 1997, 82: “he most
subtle and central quality of those actions we tend to call
ritual is the primacy of the body.” Bell is using “ritual”
and “ritualization” as broadly interchangeable terms.
12
154 • OLIVER PILZ • THE PERFORMATIVE ASPECT OF GREEK RITUAL
argues that the main purpose of ritual (or ritualization) is to produce what she calls a ritualized body.15 Ritualization is deined as “… a
strategy for the construction of a limited and
limiting power relationship”.16 he strategies
of ritualization aim to establish these power
relationships by inscribing symbolically meaningful schemes of formalized actions on the
body. Since these pre-existing schemes are “impressed” on the body,17 the ritual actor himself
assumes a merely passive role. he intentions
and strategies of those who perform rituals are
therefore largely neglected in Bell’s approach.
Ronald Grimes has rightly criticized her general tendency to ascribe an agency to the ritual
process (or to the strategies of ritualization)
rather than to the ritual actors themselves.18
In Classical studies, the claim of a dichotomy of bodily action and speech seems rooted
in the diferentiation between λεγόμενον (“that
which is said”) and δρώμενον (“that which
is done”), used by Jane Harrison to contrast
Greek myth and ritual.19 Referring to Harrison’s terminology, Albert Henrichs recently argued that ritual “… hugely favors the dromena
over the legomena …”, describing rituals such as
sacriice and libation as “… predominately nonverbal and action orientated ...”.20 However,
since sacriicial rites were usually accompanied
by invocations, prayers and screams (ololyge),21
they should not be characterized as being predominately without speech. Moreover, speech
acts that are uttered, for instance in the context
of an oath ritual, represent explicit performa-
tive utterances in the Austinian sense.22 It is, in
fact, the illocutionary force of these utterances
that constitutes the binding character of the
oath. It seems that the tendency to downplay
the role of speech in Greek ritual is caused more
by our fragmentary knowledge of the legomena
than by their actual importance in the ritual
action. A dualistic view of mind-orientated
mythological discourse and body-orientated
ritual action, as proposed by Waldner, does
not match the reality of ancient Greek ritual or
most other forms of ritual activity.
he fact that there is evidence for the ritual
enactment of myths sheds a somewhat diferent light on the aforementioned interrelation
between myth and ritual. Diodoros airms
that the sacred marriage of Zeus and Hera was
ritually enacted in a sanctuary near Knossos
that has not yet been located.23 Using the verb
ἀπομιμέομαι (“to imitate”), Diodoros clearly
stresses the mimetic character of this representation. Even though the source does not give
any further description, there is no obvious reason to assume that speech has been omitted in
the enactment of the myth. In her recent book,
Cultic theatres and ritual drama, Inge Nielsen
seems to have overlooked the aforementioned
literary evidence, which would have it in very
well with what she calls “ritual drama”. Nielsen
deines the concept of ritual drama as follows,
“… a dramatic performance with a plot taken
from the myth of the god in whose honour
it was enacted as a ritual during the festive
liturgy”.24 According to Nielsen, ritual drama
“combines” myth and ritual. However, as she
rightly states in her deinition, it falls under the
15
Bell 1992, 93, 98, 107.
Bell 1992, 8.
17
Bell 1992, 98f.
18
Grimes 2004, 134f.
19
Harrison 1927, 328f.
20
Henrichs 2000, 176. See also the critical remarks by
Mylonopoulos 2006, 92, n. 97.
21
Animal sacriice: Burkert 1985, 56. For libation
and prayer, see ibid. 71. Cf. Ar. Pax 435: σπένδοντες
ἐχώμεσθα.
16
22
For Greek oath rituals, see e.g. Saladino 1998.
Diod. 5.72.4: “λέγουσι δὲ καὶ τοὺς γάμους τοῦ τε Διὸς
καὶ τῆς Ἥρας ἐν τῇ Κνωσίων χώρᾳ γενέσθαι κατά τινα
τόπον πλησίον τοῦ Θήρηνος ποταμοῦ, καθ᾽ ὃν νῦν ἱερόν
ἐστιν, ἐν ᾧ θυσίας κατ᾽ ἐνιαυτὸν ἁγίους ὑπὸ τῶν ἐγχωρίων
συντελεῖσθαι, καὶ τοὺς γάμους ἀπομιμεῖσθαι, καθάπερ ἐξ
ἀρχῆς γενέσθαι παρεδόθησαν.”
24
Nielsen 2002, 12.
23
THE PERFORMATIVE ASPECT OF GREEK RITUAL •OLIVER PILZ • 155
category of ritual action. Several Greek sanctuaries are provided with theatres or stairways,
which might have accommodated the spectators of such cultic plays.25 Particularly in the
context of mystery cults, forms of ritual drama
and cultic play could have been used to communicate messages to the initiates. Since these
rites were kept secret, it is diicult to determine
what speciic role speech might have played in
these ritual performances. With regard to the
Eleusinian mysteries, ancient writers usually
emphasize the seeing of sacred objects during
the celebration in the Telesterion.26 Nevertheless, it would be unwise to assume that the absence of speech was a recurrent pattern in rituals performed in the context of mystery cults.
Even though there are speciic forms of
ritual that might lack explicit speech, for instance cultic dance,27 the absence of speech is
by no means a general characteristic of ritual
action. On the contrary, speech plays an essential role in various rituals. As Ulrich Demmer has recently shown, basing his arguments
on the healing and death rituals of the Jēnu
Kurumba in South India, rituals can actually
take the shape of discursive performances in
which issues are verbally negotiated between
the participants.28 herefore, a comprehensive
view must take into account the fact that verbal
utterances and bodily movements in ritual activity are oten mutually dependent and deeply
interrelated.
In Classical studies, performance theory approaches have been applied less frequently to
the analysis of ritual than to the study of dramatic and rhetoric performances.29 Two studies
on processional performance by Athena Kavoulaki can be noted as exceptions.30 Kavoulaki
convincingly demonstrates the ritual character
of Greek pompai, which had occasionally been
questioned in previous research.31 Every procession strictly followed ixed rules and regulations
regarding not only the route but also the dress
and other possible attributes of the participants
in addition to the arrangement of diferent
groups of participants within the procession.32
he formalization extended even to the manner
of walking, which was to have been more pointed and stylized than one’s everyday stride.33
One of the fundamental ideas of performance theory is that actions are carried out to
be seen, and things are said to be heard. At irst
glance, this seems to imply a clear diferentiation between ritual actors and observers. Such
delineation, however, might be misleading.34
Taking into account, for instance, the usual
sequence of procession and animal sacriice in
Greek cult practice, it becomes clear that the
majority of the participants in the procession
assumed a passive role during the sacriicial rite,
which was usually performed by only a few cult
oicials and assistants. he situation would
then, once again, be inverted during the subsequent sacriicial meal generally involving the
whole cultic community. hus, the distinction
between ritual actors and observers is rather
blurred when the view is extended to the entire
ritual sequence of a Greek festival. Roy Rappaport’s clear distinction between ritual, which
he deines as having only actively engaged participants, and drama, which he deines as having both actors and audience, therefore seems,
25
Nielsen 2002, 86–148; Becker 2003, 217–259. See
also Mylonopoulos 2006, 94–99.
26
Cf. Clinton 1992, 87.
27
On dance as a form of non-verbal communication,
see Naerebout 1997, 375–406. Yet, cultic dance may be
accompanied by music and song.
28
Demmer 2006, esp. 32–67, with further references.
29
See e.g. the papers collected in Goldhill & Osborne
1999.
30
Kavoulaki 1999; eadem 2000.
RE XXI.2 (1952), 1886, s.v. Pompa (F. Bömer).
Kavoulaki 1999, 295; eadem 2000, 145.
33
Polyaenus Strat. 5.5.2: νόμῳ πομπῆς βαδίζοντες. Kavoulaki 1999, 294; eadem 2000, 154.
34
See Kavoulaki 2000, 146 on the perception of processions as spectacles. For spectators (theatai) watching
processions: Xen. Eq. mag. 3.2; Ar. Ach. 262.
31
32
156 • OLIVER PILZ • THE PERFORMATIVE ASPECT OF GREEK RITUAL
at least in relation to ancient Greece, inappropriate.35
By drawing on the example of the Athenian
Oschophoria, I shall now focus more explicitly
on the performative aspect of a speciic ritual.
he festival of the Oschophoria was celebrated in autumn, probably on Pyanopsion 7.36
A naked youth carrying vine branches with
grape clusters (ὄσχοι), depicted on the calendar frieze of Hagios Eleutherios (Fig. 1), has
been convincingly associated with this festival.37 he main literary sources concerning the
Oschophoria (Proclus’ treatment of “oschophoric songs” and Plutarch’s Life of heseus)
aetiologically link the festival with heseus’
Cretan adventure.38 Although the sources are
fragmentary and partly contradictory, it is
widely agreed that the Oschophoria included a
procession from a Dionysiac sanctuary in Athens to the shrine of Athena Skiras in Phaleron,
a sacriice followed by a libation and a footrace
of ephebes from each tribe.39 his sequence of
procession, animal sacriice and athletic contest, is a recurrent pattern in Greek religion and
it can safely be assumed that these events were
performed in the same order at the Oschophoria.40 Since the procession led to the precinct
of Athena Skiras at Phaleron, it is furthermore
very likely that both the sacriice and race took
place there as well.
Fig. 1. Calendar rieze, Pyanopsion. Athens, Little Metropolis. Neg. D-DAI-ATH-Athen Varia 1282.
38
35
Rappaport 1999, 39–43.
36
Cf. Parker 1996, 315f., n. 85.
37
Deubner 1932, 146, n. 7, 250, pl. 35; Simon 1983,
90, pl. 3:1; Palagia 2008, 220, ig. 3. For a Hadrianic/
Antonine dating of the frieze, see Palagia 2008, 233f.
Procl. Chrestomathia ap. Phot. Bibl. 322a.13–30;
Plut. hes. 22.2–4; 23.2–5 (= Demon FGrH 327 F 6).
39
For the reconstruction of the festival, see Deubner
1932, 142–146; Parke 1977, 77–81; Waldner 2000,
101–116; Parker 2005, 211–214.
40
Calame 1990, 148; Waldner 2000, 114f.
THE PERFORMATIVE ASPECT OF GREEK RITUAL •OLIVER PILZ • 157
Additional information on the festival is
provided by an inscription irst published in
1938.41 he text, an arbitration of a conlict
between two factions of the Salaminioi, reveals the important role this genos played in
the organization of the Oschophoria. Since the
inscription was issued under the archonship of
Charakleides (363/62 BC), it irmly attests that
the festival was celebrated in the irst half of the
fourth century BC. he earliest trace of the Oschophoria, however, is provided by the fact that
Pindar composed an “oschophoric song” for an
unknown Athenian.42 As Robert Parker rightly
noted, Pindar’s oschophorikon was probably not
a victory ode in the strict sense, because a song
performed during a festival, unless improvised,
could hardly refer to a victory in the footrace
at the very same occasion.43 Moreover, Proclus
treats the oschophoric songs in connection
with other processional songs such as daphnephorika and tripodephorika. It is therefore more
likely that the oschophorika were performed
during the procession.44
Plutarch discusses the aetiological connection of the Oschophoria with the heseus legend in two diferent passages. In the irst passage, two characteristic elements of the festival
are associated with the ambiguous emotional
situation at the moment of heseus’ arrival
from Crete when the joy at the hero’s glorious
return is heavily overshadowed by the grief over
the death of his father Aigeus.45 he irst element involves the fact that it is not the herald,
but the herald’s staf, that is crowned. he second deals with the characteristic exclamation
during the libation (eleleu, iou, iou), which ex-
presses, according to Plutarch, both hope and
desperation.46
At the end of the second passage that is relevant to the Oschophoria, Plutarch explicitly
refers to his sources, the fourth-century BC
Atthidographer Demon (= FGrH 327 F 6):
41
46
Ferguson 1938; LSS 19; SEG 21, 527; Lambert
1997.
42
Rutherford & Irvine 1988, on P Oxy 2451 B fr. 17.
43
Parker 2005, 212.
44
Kavoulaki 2000, 153.
45
Plut. hes. 22.2–4.
“ἐπεὶ δ’ ἐπανῆλθεν, αὐτόν τε πομπεῦσαι καὶ
τοὺς νεανίσκους, οὕτως ἀμπεχομένους ὡς νῦν
ἀμπέχονται τοὺς ὠσχοὺς φέροντες. φέρουσι δὲ
Διονύσῳ καὶ Ἀριάδνῃ χαριζόμενοι διὰ τὸν μῦθον, ἢ
μᾶλον ὅτι συγκομιζομένης ὀπώρας ἐπανῆλθον. αἱ
δὲ δειπνοφόροι παραλαμβάνονται καὶ κοινωνοῦσι
τῆς θυσίας, ἀπομιμούμεναι τὰς μητέρας ἐκείνων
τῶν λαχόντων∙ ἐπεφοίτων γὰρ αὐτοῖς ὄψα καὶ
σιτία κομίζουσαι∙ καὶ μῦθοι λέγονται διὰ τὸ
κἀκείνας εὐθυμίας ἕνεκα καὶ παρηγορίας μύθους
διεξιέναι τοῖς παισί. ταῦτα μὲν οὖν καὶ Δήμων
ἱστόρηκεν.”47
“And when he came back, he himself and
these two young men led a procession, dressed
as those are now dressed who carry the vine
branches. hey carry these in honour of Dionysos and Ariadne on account of the legend; or
rather because they came back at the time of the
vintage. he deipnophoroi take part and share in
the sacriice, and imitate the mothers of those
on whom the lot fell, for these kept coming to
them with meat and bread. And tales are told
because those mothers recounted tales to comfort and encourage their children. hese details
are also to be found in the history of Demon.”
Both Proclus and Plutarch agree that the procession was led by two youths who were dressed
as girls and held vine branches with bunches of
grapes (ὄσχοι). he two oschophoroi were chosen by the already known herald, a priestess (of
Athena Skiras?), and an archon, who was ap-
Plut. hes. 22.4: “ὅθεν καὶ νῦν ἐν τοῖς Ὠσχοφορίοις
στεφανοῦσθαι μὲν οὐ τὸν κήρυκα λέγουσιν, ἀλὰ τὸ
κηρύκειον, ἐπιφωνεῖν δ’ ἐν ταῖς σπονδαῖς ‘ἐλελεῦ ἰοὺ ἰοὺ’
τοὺς παρόντας, ὧν τὸ μὲν σπένδοντες ἀναφωνεῖν καὶ
παιωνίζοντες εἰώθασι, τὸ δ’ ἐκπλήξεως καὶ ταραχῆς ἐστι.”
47
Plut. hes. 23.3–5.
158 • OLIVER PILZ • THE PERFORMATIVE ASPECT OF GREEK RITUAL
pointed by lot alternately from both factions of
the Salaminioi.48 Independently, we learn that
the two boys came from wealthy and noble
families.49 According to Plutarch, the oschophoroi carried vine branches in honour of Dionysos and Ariadne or because heseus returned
from Crete during the vintage season. Immediately aterwards, however, Plutarch refers to a
second tradition which apparently linked the
procession to heseus’ departure from Athens.
As Waldner has convincingly shown, here Plutarch unsuccessfully tried to reconcile diferent versions of the atthidographic tradition.50
According to Proclus, the oschophoroi were
followed by a chorus chanting oschophoric
songs.51 What remains unclear is whether this
chorus was male, female or mixed. here is
no obvious reason to postulate, as is generally
done, that it was a male chorus.52 Given the
close aetiological connection with heseus’
Cretan adventure, it might in fact be more reasonable to assume that it was a mixed chorus
made up of both boys and girls.53 An exclusively
male or female chorus would not have it the
myth, which clearly speaks of seven youths
and seven maidens accompanying the hero to
Crete. At any rate, it would be unwise to use the
composition of the chorus, which as we have
seen remains uncertain, as an argument for the
interpretation of the festival.
Supposedly, already in the course of the
procession, women called δειπνοφόροι (“dinner-carriers”) acted as the mothers of the twice
seven chosen to accompany heseus to Crete.
Interestingly, the verb ἀπομιμέομαι is again used
to emphasize the staged aspect of the performance. To comfort and encourage their “children”, the deipnophoroi not only ofered them
food, but also told them stories (μῦθοι). Unfortunately, it is not entirely clear exactly where
and when in the course of the various festival
events that this ritual meal and storytelling
took place. According to the aetiological tradition, the seven youths and seven maidens were
held in seclusion during the days before their
departure for Crete, but their mothers continued to bring them food.54 In connection with
the fact that Hesychios mentions a place called
the oschophorion situated near the temple of
Athena Skiras at Phaleron,55 scholars generally
believe that the meal was consumed there.56
Even though Plutarch does not allude to
the ephebic race mentioned by Proclus and
others, the association with the Oschophoria
is supported by the fact that a competition
(ἅμιλος) is mentioned in the Salaminioi inscription.57 Edward Kadletz postulated a race
run from a temple of Dionysos in Athens to
the precinct of Athena Skiras in Phaleron,58
but Deubner had already shown that both the
account of Aristodemos and that of the scholiast to Nicander are most likely the products
of a confusion between the race and procession at the Oschophoria.59 he winner of the
race drank from a vessel called the πενταπλόα,
which contained a mixture of olive oil, wine,
honey, cheese and barley.60 Pierre Vidal-Naquet
has recognized close parallels between the race
at the Oschophoria and the race of the staphylodromoi (“grape cluster runners”) during the
48
LSS 19, ll. 47–50.
Istros FGrH 334 F 8; cf. Hsch. s.v. Ὀσχοφόρια:
παῖδες εὐγενεῖς; Phot. Lex. s.v. ὀσχοφορεῖν: εὐγενὴς παῖς.
50
Waldner 2000, 110.
51
Procl. Chrestomathia ap. Phot. Bibl. 322a. 26–27.
52
See e.g. Parker 2005 (217) who argues for a male
chorus to strengthen his interpretation of the Oschophoria as an “ephebes’ rite”.
53
Calame 1990, 335, 338; Calame 2001, 127f. Without a justiied reason, Waldner says the chorus is female,
Waldner 2000, 115f., 141.
49
54
Philoch. FGrH 328 F 183.
Hsch. s.v. Ὀσχοφόριον∙ τόπος Ἀθήνησι Φαληροῖ,
ἔνθα τὸ τῆς Ἀθηνᾶς ἱερόν.
56
See e.g. Waldner 2000, 163.
57
LSS 19, l. 61.
58
Kadletz 1980, esp. 370.
59
Deubner 1932, 145 on Aristodemos FGrH 383 F 9
and Schol. Nic. Alex. 109a. Cf. Parker 2005, 213f.
60
Procl. Chrestomathia ap. Phot. Bibl. 322a.28–30.
55
THE PERFORMATIVE ASPECT OF GREEK RITUAL •OLIVER PILZ • 159
Spartan Karneia held in honour of Apollo Karneios.61 he Karneia, an annual festival of the
phratriai, was celebrated in the summer month
of Karneios.62 he ancient tradition emphasizes the military aspect of the festival, describing
it as an imitation of soldier life.63 In each of the
nine temporarily erected tent-like constructions (σκιάδες), nine men ate together. here
is strong evidence that musical competitions
took place at the Karneia, and choral dances by
youths and maidens may have been performed
during the festival.64 What seems to be the most
important ritual during the festival was the
race of the staphylodromoi. In this race, a man
wrapped up in woollen illets (στέμματα) was
chased by youths (νέοι) called staphylodromoi.
he staphylodromoi were chosen by lot among
the karneatai, unmarried (ἄγαμοι) men who
were in charge of the organization of the festival.65 To catch the illet-draped runner meant
good luck for the city. Interestingly, the sources
do not explicitly mention that the staphylodromoi carried bunches of grapes as in the case of
the oschophoroi, and perhaps the staphylodromoi were merely wreathed with grapevine.66
Sam Wide has emphasized the agricultural
aspect of the Karneia (“Weinlesefest”) and
explained the staphylodromia as an expiation
rite.67 However, since the Karneia was held
61
Vidal-Naquet 1986, 116, 126, n. 51. For the Karneia, see Wide 1893, 73–87; Burkert 1985, 234–236;
Pettersson 1992, 57–72.
62
According to Plut. Nic. 28.2, the Spartan month
of Karneios corresponds to the Attic month of Metageitnion (August/September).
63
Ath. 4.141e–f.
64
Musical competitions: Ath. 14.635e–f (= Hellanikos FGrH 4 F 85a). Choral dances: Burkert 1985, 234,
440, n. 6. Cf. Calame 2001, 203, n. 349.
65
Anecd. Bekk. I, 305.25; Hsch. s.v. καρνεᾶται,
σταφυλοδρόμοι.
66
Pace Wide 1893, 76: “… Staphylodromen, welche
wahrscheinlich Traubenzweige in den Händen hielten … ”.
For the scarce evidence of grapevine wreaths, see Blech
1982, 211.
67
Wide 1893, 75–83.
in midsummer rather than in autumn, a close
connection with the grape vintage remains
doubtful. It was Henri Jeanmaire who irst suggested an interpretation of the festival as a rite
of passage for male adolescents on the threshold of nubile age.68 his interpretation has wide
acceptance but the speciic character of the
staphylodromia as a pursuit race is not easy to
reconcile with any initiatory interpretation. It
has long been noted that the man draped with
the stemmata resembles a sacriicial animal,
probably a ram.69 Moreover, in contrast to the
oschophoroi leading the procession, the runners in the race at the Oschophoria most likely
did not carry grape clusters or vine branches.70
As will be shown later on, the oschophoroi belonged to a somewhat younger age group than
the ephebic runners in the races at the Oschophoria and Karneia. hus, the alleged parallels
between the oschophoroi and the staphylodromoi seem rather supericial.
Despite the fact that the Oschophoria are
clearly associated with both Athena Skiras and
Dionysos in the textual sources, a long-standing
debate arose about which deity was chiely honoured at the festival. Whereas Deubner, Simon,
and more recently Hedreen, argued for a festival
of Dionysos,71 the Oschophoria were primarily linked to Athena by Ferguson, Ziehen and
Parke.72 Lately scholars have tried to resolve the
issue by attributing the festival to both gods.73
Even though the Oschophoria are, according
to present day knowledge, the only case of a
shared cult of Athena and Dionysos, it would
68
Jeanmaire 1939, 524–526. Cf. Pettersson 1992, 71f.
Wide 1893, 78f. and Burkert 1985, 235 on heoc.
Id. 5.83 and Hsch. s.v. κάρνος. For the adornment of
sacriicial animals with stemmata, see Blech 1982, 303f.
70
Cf. above n. 59.
71
Deubner 1932, 143f.; Simon 1983, 90, 91f.; Hedreen 1992, 84, n. 132.
72
Ferguson 1938, 38–41; Ziehen 1942, 1541f.; Parke
1977, 79.
73
Deacy 1997, 160; Waldner 2000, 145–150, 159–
163; Calame 2001, 125, 137; Parker 2005, 215.
69
160 • OLIVER PILZ • THE PERFORMATIVE ASPECT OF GREEK RITUAL
Fig. 2. Attic pinax (inv. no. 15124). Athens, National Museum. Ater Fritzilas 2000, pl. 3:1.
in fact be unwise to deny that both gods played
a similarly important role in the festival. Several
Attic black-igured vases showing Athena and
Dionysos engaged in conversation might be
seen as a glimpse into their cultic community at
the Oschophoria. Interestingly, all these vases
date to a rather short period covering the late
sixth and early ith centuries BC.74
Less surprisingly, the interpretation of the
festival itself has been similarly controversial.75
Since the Oschophoria are clearly related to
the grape harvest, various scholars have, in the
tradition of Wilhelm Mannhardt, interpreted
the festival as a thanksgiving.76 Claude Calame
substantially modiied this “agricultural” interpretation focusing on the symbolic value of
the grape clusters carried by the oschophoroi,
the pentaploa with its ive ingredients and the
food (ὄψα καὶ σιτία) brought by the deipnophoroi. He interpreted the sequence of these rites
as a symbolic representation of human dietary
development from raw fruit, closely linked to
74
LIMC II (1984), 1000 s.v. Athena, nos. 486–488,
pl. 755 (P. Demargne); LIMC III (1986), 466 s.v. Dionysos, nos. 500–504, pl. 357 (C. Gasparri).
75
Cf. Waldner’s (2000, 134–138) remarks on the previous research.
76
Mannhardt 1877, 253–256; Deubner 1932, 146;
Ferguson 1938, 40; Parke 1977, 160f.; Simon 1983, 90.
Dionysos, to a cooked “nourriture civilisée” associated with Athena.77
While Dionysos is intimately connected
with winegrowing, Athena’s link with fertility
is much less straightforward. However, there
is some scattered evidence that associates the
goddess with afairs of this kind.78 A fragmentary Attic black-igured pinax from the Athenian Acropolis (Fig. 2) shows Athena—only her
helmet is preserved on the let edge—watching
the harvest of grapes carried out by youthful
and bearded men.79 Since all these igures are
wreathed and apparently naked, a religious
connotation is obvious, and the representation
should therefore not be regarded as a genre
scene.80 Given the prominent role of Athena at
the Oschophoria, a festival closely linked with
the grape harvest, one wonders if the painter
might have had this speciic occasion in mind.
In the Salaminioi inscription, the sacriice of a
pregnant sheep to Athena Skiras is attested.81
his sacriice, however, did not take place at
the Oschophoria but in the following month of
Maimakterion. In addition, a possible case of a
pregnant sacriicial victim for Athena is attest-
77
78
79
80
81
Calame 1990, 324–327, 338f.
Cf. Parker 2005, 418.
Fritzilas 2000.
Pace Fritzilas 2000, 40: “reale Weinleseszene”.
LSS 19, l. 92. Cf. Ferguson 1938, 28, 40.
THE PERFORMATIVE ASPECT OF GREEK RITUAL •OLIVER PILZ • 161
ed iconographically. A fragmentary votive relief found at the Athenian Acropolis and dated
to ca 490 BC shows a man, a woman and three
children (two boys and a girl) appearing before
the goddess.82 In the foreground, an apparently
pregnant sow, the family’s ofering to Athena,
is depicted. It is widely agreed that pregnant
sacriicial victims are associated with fertility
goddesses.83 Emphasizing the abnormal and
allegedly negative character of such sacriices,
Jan Bremmer has recently contradicted this
view.84 Bremmer argues that a “negative” sacriice would it the “abnormal” transitional period between youth and adulthood. Be this as
it may, in the speciic case of the votive relief it
seems somewhat daring to deduce a direct link
between the sacriice of a (possibly) pregnant
animal and a boy’s rites of passage.85 Given the
general proximity of the concept of fertility and
the maturation of children and adolescents, the
connection is more likely an indirect one. At
any rate, it has become clear that Athena, in
particular Athena Skiras, might have been involved to some extent with fertility.
In more recent research, the “agricultural”
interpretation of the festival has been pushed
aside in favour of a diferent interpretative approach focusing on the reputed initiatory character of the rite.86 Expressing some reservation
about terms such as “rite of passage” and “initiation”, Robert Parker has recently proposed
a reading of the Oschophoria as an “ephebes’
rite”. His interpretation, however, falls generally in line with the traditional initiatory
approach.87 According to this view, the cross-
dressing of the two boys carrying vine branches
is a clear indication of the rite’s initiatory character. Furthermore, it is generally assumed that
the two oschophoroi stand for their entire age
class.88 In this line of reasoning, however, scholars seem to neglect the fact that the oschophoroi
and the ephebes competing in the tribal race
almost certainly did not represent the same age
group. Only Waldner rightly emphasized that
the literary sources describe the oschophoroi as
παῖδες, νεανίσκοι or νεανίαι, whereas the runners are usually referred to as ἔφηβοι or ἠιθέοι.89
It is therefore probable that the oschophoroi,
and perhaps also the members of the chorus
following them, were not identical to the male
adolescents competing in the tribal race but
may have represented a younger age group.
he aforementioned calendar frieze of Hagios
Eleutherios possibly illustrates this age diference. Next to the naked youth holding a grapevine is depicted a little boy with a large branch
on his shoulder (Fig. 1). he branch is commonly interpreted as the eiresione, an olive or
laurel branch wound with woollen ribbons and
decorated with various kinds of fruits. In all
likelihood, the igure alludes to the Pyanopsia,
a festival of Apollo which was celebrated on
Pyanopsion 7, as were most likely the Oschophoria.90 he oicial procession at the Pyanopsia was led by a boy with “both parents alive”
(παῖς ἀμφιθαλής) carrying the eiresione.91 Based
on epigraphical evidence, Noel Robertson was
able to establish an age of about seven years
for two such boys.92 Regarding the much older
male adolescent representing the Oschophoria
(Fig. 1), various interpretations have been sug-
82
van Straten 1995, 77, 289, R58, ig. 79.
Nilsson 1967, 151f.; Scullion 1994, 86; Parker
2005, 416.
84
Bremmer 2005.
85
Cf. Bremmer 2005, 162. For an interpretation as an
ofering on the occasion of the Apatouria, see Palagia
1995.
86
Jeanmaire 1939, 344–358; Vidal-Naquet 1986,
116f.; Leitao 1995, 133, 148f.
87
Parker 2005, 216f.
83
88
Bremmer 1999, 190f.; Parker 2005, 217.
Waldner 2000, 114, n. 49f.
90
For the Pyanopsia, see Deubner 1932, 198–201;
Parke 1977, 75–77; Parker 2005, 204–206.
91
With regard to the Oschophoria, a single source
(Schol. Nic. Alex. 109a), probably confusing the race
with the procession, speaks of the runners as παῖδες
ἀμφιθαλεῖς; cf. above n. 59.
92
Robertson 1984, 389f.
89
162 • OLIVER PILZ • THE PERFORMATIVE ASPECT OF GREEK RITUAL
gested. Whereas Erika Simon believed that
Dionysos himself is depicted, Kadletz argued
that it was the winner in the ephebic race.93 Be
this as it may, the oschophoroi, whose age could
have approximately corresponded to that of the
boy carrying the eiresione at the Pyanopsia, almost certainly belonged to a somewhat younger age group than the adolescents participating
in the race at the Oschophoria.
It is evident that a complex festival such as
the Oschophoria cannot be interpreted simply
in terms of either its agricultural or initiatory
aspect. A comprehensive approach must take
account of both aspects and must also properly consider the speciic role of each group of
participants. As we have seen, along with the
ephebes competing in the tribal race, children
(oschophoroi), adult women (deipnophoroi)
and, most likely, male and female adolescents
(chorus members) also took part in the rites.
Moreover, it can be assumed that other groups
not explicitly mentioned by Plutarch and Proclus participated in both the procession to, and
the sacriicial rites at, Phaleron.94 he conventional initiatory approach, though, not only
exclusively focuses on the male adolescents
competing in the race and the allegedly ephebic
oschophoroi, but also tends to interpret the role
of all other participants in relation to both of
these groups. he transvestism of the oschophoroi is usually seen as a way of dramatizing the
moment of transition from girlish boy to mature man,95 yet cross-dressing is not necessarily
connected with initiation, since the phenomenon occurs in a wide range of instances including wedding rites and Dionysiac status reversal
93
Simon 1983, 90; Kadletz 1980, 368.
Women called κώπαι (“handles”) are mentioned in
the Salaminioi inscription (LSS 19, l. 46; cf. Ferguson
1938, 46f.; Parker 2005, 215, n. 101) and probably
played a role in the festival.
95
Vidal-Naquet 1986, 116. Cf. Leitao 1995, 146 for
the case of the Ekdysia at Phaistos.
94
rituals.96 Calame, in fact, explicitly rejected an
initiatory interpretation and described the festival as an example of “bouleversement des catégories sociales”, typical for rituals associated
with Dionysos.97 Given the diversity of the participating groups, a mere initiatory approach or
a label such as “ephebes’ rite” seems inadequately reductive, since these interpretations cannot
provide a comprehensive explanation of the
festival.98 Even though the aspect of socialization of male, and possibly also female, children
and adolescents clearly plays an important role,
the Oschophoria should not be seen as either a
rite of passage for a speciic male age group or
as a “survival” of a tribal rite of initiation.
Elaborating on the earlier interpretative approaches, Waldner recently proposed a more
balanced reading of the Oschophoria.99 Despite her practice theory approach to ritual
already criticized above, Waldner’s interpretation has several points of contact with a genuine performative perspective. Particularly with
regard to the procession, the display of wealth
and social status is acknowledged as an essential
element.100 Waldner furthermore recognized
the importance of the personal experience of
the ritual actors, but her perception of this
experience was largely determined by the view
that the rituals at the Oschophoria relect polis
ideology. his view is ultimately rooted in the
Durkheimian concept of ritual as replicating
and reinforcing social structure. Performing
the rites at the Oschophoria, the participants
indeed experienced polis religion as a norma-
96
For a recent general discussion of cross-dressing in
ancient Greece, see Miller 1999, 241–246 with references. On Dionysiac transvestism, see Csapo 1997,
262–264.
97
Calame 1990, 334–337, 339.
98
For a general criticism of the application of the initiation scheme, see Versnel 1993, 48–60, 56f. (Oschophoria).
99
Waldner 2000, 138–175 (brief summary in Der
neue Pauly IX [2000], 81f. s.v. Oschophorien).
100
Waldner 2000, 139.
THE PERFORMATIVE ASPECT OF GREEK RITUAL •OLIVER PILZ • 163
tive system. Yet, what is largely neglected in this
approach is the participant’s individual experience of the rite, which is obviously much more
diicult to grasp. It is important to note that the
transformative capacity of ritual lies precisely in
the personal experience of the single individual
rather than in the “external” aspect of, for instance, a status change which is moreover oten
wrongly ascribed to the respective rites.101
On a basic level of interpretation, several
parts of the Oschophoria could be seen as a
ritual re-enactment of heseus’ Cretan adventure.102 Since the plot is not taken from the
myth of the gods in whose honour the festival is celebrated, this re-enactment would not
exactly correspond to the deinition for ritual
drama given by Nielsen, but it should deinitely
be described as a form of cultic play. 103 With regard to the ritual actors, the mimetic character
of the ritual performance implies intensively
experienced role-playing through a temporally
framed identiication with the mythical protagonists. Here, the case of the women serving
as deipnophoroi is of particular interest. By acting as “dinner-carriers”, these women directly
experience the feelings and emotions of mothers whose children’s lives are at stake. his experience might have strengthened their ability
to face similar situations in their own lives. he
fact that the women tell stories (μῦθοι) testiies
to the essential role that speech played in this
speciic ritual performance. We do not learn
what these stories were about, but they probably functioned within the framework of the
mythical plot, that is, the mothers told the
mythoi in order to encourage and comfort their
“children”. Obviously, the stories told by the
deipnophoroi do not constitute performative utterances in the Austinian sense, but narratives.
As we are impeded from any analysis of their
101
See Grimes 2004, esp. 116, 122 for a sceptical view
of the transformative properties of ritual.
102
Nielsen 2002, 115.
103
Cf. above n. 24.
pragmatics and formal structure, it can only
be very generally noted that storytelling is frequently used as an instrument by which social
identities are constructed and negotiated.104
No matter whether the stories were derived
from the heseus myth or not, the Oschophoria might have thus provided a public forum for
the negotiation of personal and collective identities by means of ritualized narrative performances. Regarding the personal experience of
the ritual actors, a similar point can be made for
the oschophoroi which were, as already pointed
out, chosen from wealthy and noble families.
Leading the procession, the boys did not merely display the high social status of their families
but experienced this status personally. By trying
to properly “play” their roles as oschophoroi, the
boys aimed, in the irst place, to fulil an obligation toward their families. Nevertheless, this
experience would certainly have helped them
become aware of the elevated position of their
families in Athenian society.
In an interesting case study of the ceremony
concluding the Hindu funeral of V.S. Naipaul’s
sister Sati, celebrated in Trinidad in 1985, Tomas Gerholm demonstrated that there was
no coherent perspective on this ritual which
would have been shared by all participants.105
Gerholm’s analysis was based on the description of the ceremony the West Indian author
gave in an autobiographical novel published
two years ater his sister’s death.106 Aside from
Naipaul himself and the ritual expert performing the rite, Sati’s widowed husband and
her adolescent son were present. Gerholm detected a plurality of diferent attitudes to the
ritual that depended not only on the religious
knowledge and devotion but also on the level
of emotional involvement of the individual
participants. hese diferent attitudes were
104
105
106
Bauman 1986, 113.
Gerholm 1988.
Naipaul 1987, 343–354.
164 • OLIVER PILZ • THE PERFORMATIVE ASPECT OF GREEK RITUAL
likely to have caused a considerable diversity in
the individual experience of the ritual. he implications of this insight are far-reaching: there
is no coherent meaning of a given ritual that
would have been conceived by all participants
in the same way. he fact that the individual experiences of the participants substantially difer
from each other results instead in a fragmentation of meaning. Considering the case of the
Oschophoria, there could be reasons to assume
that Gerholm’s perceptions are valid not only
for our culturally fragmented modern world
but, at least partly, also for the supposedly more
coherent cultural system of ancient Greece.
DR OLIVER PILZ
Institut für Klassische Archäologie
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität
opilz@uni-mainz.de
Bibliography
Austin 1962 J.L. Austin, How to do things
with words, Cambridge,
Mass. 1962.
Bauman
R. Bauman, Story, performance,
1986
and event: Contextual studies
of oral narratives, Cambridge
1986.
Becker 2003 T. Becker, Griechische Stufenanlagen. Untersuchungen zur
Architektur, Entwicklungsgeschichte, Funktion und
Repräsentation, Münster 2003.
Bell 1992
C. Bell, Ritual theory, ritual
practice, New York & Oxford
1992.
Bell 1997
C. Bell, Ritual: Perspective and
dimensions, Oxford &
New York 1997.
Blech 1982
M. Blech, Studien zum Kranz
bei den Griechen (Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und
Vorarbeiten, 38), Berlin &
New York 1982.
Bremmer
J.N. Bremmer, ‘“Religion”,
1998
“ritual” and the opposition
“sacred” vs. “profane”’, in
Ansichten griechischer Rituale.
Geburtstagssymposion für Walter Burkert, Castelen bei Basel,
15. bis 18. März 1996, ed.
F. Graf, Stuttgart & Leipzig
1998, 9–32.
Bremmer
J.N. Bremmer, ‘Transvestite
1999
Dionysos’, in Rites of passage
in ancient Greece: Literature,
religion, society (= Bucknell
Review 43, 1999), ed. M.W.
Padilla, Lewisburg 1999,
183–200.
Bremmer
J.N. Bremmer, ‘he sacriices
2005
of pregnant animals’, in Greek
sacriicial ritual, Olympian and
chthonian. Proceedings of the
sixth international seminar on
ancient Greek cult organized by
the Department of Classical
Archaeology and Ancient History, Göteborg University, 25–
27 April 1997 (ActaAth-8°,
18), eds. R. Hägg & B. Alroth,
Stockholm 2005, 155–165.
Burkert 1983 W. Burkert, ‘he problem of
ritual killing’, in Violent origins:
Walter Burkert, René Girard,
and Jonathan Z. Smith on
ritual killing and cultural formation, ed. R.G. HamertonKelly, Stanford 1983, 149–176.
Burkert 1985 W. Burkert, Greek religion: Archaic and Classical, Cambridge,
Mass. 1985.
THE PERFORMATIVE ASPECT OF GREEK RITUAL •OLIVER PILZ • 165
Burkert 2006 W. Burkert, ‘Ritual between
ethnology and Post-modern
aspects: Philological-historical
notes’, in Ritual and communication in the Graeco-Roman
world (Kernos, Suppl. 16),
ed. E. Stavrianopoulou,
Liège 2006, 23–35.
Calame 1990 C. Calame, hésée et l’imaginaire
athénien: légende et culte en
Grèce antique, Lausanne 1990.
Calame 2001 C. Calame, Choruses of young
women in ancient Greece,
Lanham 2001.
Clinton 1992 K. Clinton, Myth and cult: he
iconography of the Eleusinian
Mysteries (ActaAth-8°, 11),
Stockholm 1992.
Csapo 1997 E. Csapo, ‘Riding the phallus
for Dionysus: Iconology, ritual
and gender-role de/construction’,
Phoenix 51, 1997, 253–295.
Deacy 1997 S. Deacy, ‘Athena and the
Amazons: Mortal and immortal femininity in Greek
myth’, in What is a god? Studies
in the nature of Greek divinity,
ed. A.B. Lloyd, London 1997,
153–168.
Demmer
U. Demmer, Rhetorik, Poetik,
2006
Performanz. Das Ritual und
seine Dynamik bei den Jēnu
Kuṟumba (Südindien),
Münster 2006.
Deubner
L. Deubner, Attische Feste,
1932
Berlin 1932.
Ferguson
W.S. Ferguson, ‘he Salaminoi
1938
of Heptaphyloi and Sounion’,
Hesperia 7, 1938, 1–74.
FischerE. Fischer-Lichte, ‘Performance,
Lichte 2003 Inszenierung, Ritual: Zur
Klärung kulturwissenschatli-
cher Schlüsselbegrife’, in
Geschichtswissenschat und
“performative turn”. Ritual,
Inszenierung und Performanz
vom Mittelalter bis zur Neuzeit,
eds. J. Martschukat & S. Patzold, Köln, Weimar & Berlin
2003, 33–54.
Fritzilas
S.A. Fritzilas, ‘Athena beim
2000
Weinlesefest. Eine Votivtafel
des Rycrot-Malers’, Hete des
Archäologischen Seminars der
Universität Bern 17, 2000,
15–19.
Geertz 1973 C. Geertz, he interpretation of
cultures: Selected essays,
New York 1973.
Gerholm
T. Gerholm, ‘On ritual: A
1988
postmodernist view’, Ethnos:
Journal of Anthropology 53,
1988, 190–203.
Goldhill & Performance culture and AthenOsborne
ian democracy, eds. S. Goldhill
1999
& R. Osborne, Cambridge 1999.
Grimes 2004 R.L. Grimes, ‘Performance
theory and the study of ritual’,
in New approaches to the study
of religion II: Textual, comparative, sociological, and cognitive
approaches, eds. P. Antes, A.W.
Geertz & R.R. Warne, Berlin
& New York 2004, 109–138.
Grimes 2006 R.L. Grimes, ‘Performance’, in
heorizing rituals: Issues, topics,
approaches, concepts, eds. J.
Kreinath, J. Snoek & M. Stausberg, Leiden & Boston 2006,
379–394.
Harrison
J.E. Harrison, hemis: A study
1927
in the social origins of Greek religion, Cambridge 19272.
166 • OLIVER PILZ • THE PERFORMATIVE ASPECT OF GREEK RITUAL
Hedreen
1992
Henrichs
2000
Jeanmaire
1939
Kadletz
1980
Kavoulaki
1999
Kavoulaki
2000
Lambert
1997
Leitao 1995
Mannhardt
1877
G.M. Hedreen, Silens in Attic
black-igure vase painting: Myth
and performance, Ann Arbor
1992.
A. Henrichs, ‘Drama and
dromena: Bloodshed, violence,
and sacriicial metaphor in
Euripides’, HSCP 100, 2000,
173–188.
H. Jeanmaire, Couroi et
Courètes: essai sur l’éducation
spartiate et sur les rites
d’adolescence dans l’antiquité
hellénique, Lille 1939.
E. Kadletz, ‘he race and
procession of the Oscophoria’,
GRBS 21, 1980, 363–371.
A. Kavoulaki, ‘Processional
performance and the democratic polis’, in Performance culture and Athenian democracy,
eds. S. Goldhill & R. Osborne,
Cambridge 1999, 293–320.
A. Kavoulaki, ‘he ritual performance of a pompê:Aspects
and perspectives’, in Δώρημα.
A tribute to the A. G. Leventis
Foundation on the occasion of its
20th anniversary, ed. A. Serghidou, Nicosia 2000, 145–158.
S.D. Lambert, ‘he Attic genos
Salaminioi and the island of
Salamis’, ZPE 119, 1997,
85–106.
D.D. Leitao, ‘he perils of Leukippos: Initiatory transvestism
and male gender ideology in
the Ekdusia at Phaistos’,
ClAnt 14, 1995, 130–163.
W. Mannhardt, Wald- und
Feldkulte II. Antike Wald- und
Feldkulte, Berlin 1877.
Miller 1999
Mylonopoulos 2006
Naerebout
1997
Naipaul
1987
Nielsen 2002
Nilsson 1967
Palagia 1995
Palagia 2008
Parke 1977
Parker 1996
Parker 2005
M.C. Miller, ‘Re-examining
transvestism in Archaic and
Classical Athens: he Zewadski stamnos’, AJA 103, 1999,
223–258.
J. Mylonopoulos, ‘Greek sanctuaries as places of communication through ritual’, in Ritual
and communication in the
Graeco-Roman world (Kernos,
Suppl. 16), ed. E. Stavrianopoulou, Liège 2006, 69–109.
F.G. Naerebout, Attractive
performances. Ancient Greek
dance: hree preliminary studies, Amsterdam 1997.
V.S. Naipaul, he enigma of
arrival, New York 1987.
I. Nielsen, Cultic theatres and
ritual drama: A study in regional development and religious
interchange between East and
West in antiquity, Aarhus 2002.
M.P. Nilsson, Geschichte
der griechischen Religion I,
München 19673.
O. Palagia, ‘Akropolis Museum
581: A family at the Apaturia’,
Hesperia 64, 1995, 493–501.
O. Palagia, ‘he date and iconography of the Calendar
Frieze on the Little Metropolis,
Athens’, JdI 123, 2008, 215–237.
H.W. Parke, Festivals of the
Athenians, London 1977.
R. Parker, Athenian religion:
A history, Oxford 1996.
R. Parker, Polytheism and
society at Athens, Oxford
& New York 2005.
THE PERFORMATIVE ASPECT OF GREEK RITUAL •OLIVER PILZ • 167
Pettersson
1992
Rappaport
1999
Robertson
1984
Rutherford
& Irvine
1988
Saladino
1998
Scullion
1994
Searle 1969
Searle 1989
Simon 1983
Singer 1955
van Straten
1995
M. Pettersson, Cults of Apollo
at Sparta: he Hyakinthia, the
Gymnopaidiai and the Karneia
(ActaAth-8°,12), Stockholm
1992.
R. Rappaport, Ritual and religion in the making of humanity,
Cambridge 1999.
N. Robertson, ‘he ritual background of the Erysichthon
story’, AJP 105, 1984, 369–
408.
I.C. Rutherford & J.A.D. Irvine, ‘he race in the Athenian
Oschophoria and an Oschophoricon by Pindar’, ZPE 72,
1988, 43–51.
V. Saladino, ‘Aspetti rituali del
giuramento greco’, in Seminari
di storia e di diritto antico II.
Studi sul giuramento nel mondo
antico, ed. A. Calore, Milano
1998, 87–106.
S. Scullion, ‘Olympian and
Chthonian’, ClAnt 13, 1994,
75–119.
J.R. Searle, Speech acts: An essay
in the philosophy of language,
London 1969.
J.R. Searle, ‘How performatives
work’, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 1989, 535–558.
E. Simon, Festivals of Attica:
An archaeological commentary,
Madison 1983.
M. Singer, ‘he cultural pattern
of Indian civilization: A preliminary report of a methodological ield study’, Far Eastern
Quarterly 15, 1955, 23–35.
F.T. van Straten, Hierà kalá:
Images of animal sacriice in
Stavrianopoulou 2006
Tambiah
1979
Turner 1969
Turner 1986
Versnel 1993
VidalNaquet 1986
Waldner
2000
Wide 1893
Ziehen 1942
Archaic and Classical Greece
(Religions in the GraecoRoman World, 127), Leiden,
New York & Köln 1995.
Ritual and communication
in the Graeco-Roman world
(Kernos, Suppl. 16), ed. E.
Stavrianopoulou, Liège 2006.
S.J. Tambiah, ‘A performative
approach to ritual’, Proceedings of the British Academy 65,
1979, 113–169.
V. Turner, he ritual process:
Structure and anti-structure,
London 1969.
V. Turner, he anthropology of
performance, New York 1986.
H.S. Versnel, Inconsistencies in
Greek and Roman religion II.
Transition and reversal in myth
and ritual, Leiden, New York
& Köln 1993.
P. Vidal-Naquet, ‘he Black
Hunter and the origin of the
Athenian ephebia’, in P. VidalNaquet, he Black hunter:
Forms of thought and forms
of society in the Greek world,
Baltimore 1986, 106–128.
K. Waldner, Geburt und
Hochzeit des Kriegers. Geschlechterdiferenz und Initiation
in Mythos und Ritual der
griechischen Polis (Religionsgeschichtliche Versuche und
Vorarbeiten, 46), Berlin &
New York 2000.
S. Wide, Lakonische Kulte,
Leipzig 1893.
L. Ziehen, RE XVIII.2 (1942),
1537–1543, s.v. Oschophoria.