Astronomy

"Chronology is the backbone of history" is usually taught in schools but in the same time the first fall of Babylon is currently fixed either in 1595 BCE or in 1651, 1531, 1499 depending on historians! Such a difference in timeline prevents from reaching the historical truth. It is for this reason that from Herodotus, the "father of history" (in fact the father of scientific and chronological inquiry), Greek historians have gradually established a system of scientific dating in order to write a universal history. Many astronomical phenomena (observed and described by Babylonian astrologers), which are well identified such as eclipses, enable anyone today (with at least an undergraduate level) to synchronize these ancient dating systems and anchor them on absolute dates. As incredible as it may seem this is still not done (among the hundreds of thousands of theses in history there is none which focuses on chronology, except the one of Isaac Newton in 1728 entitled: Chronology of ancient kingdoms amended). The purpose of the present item is to understand the origin of this anomaly and above all to give the tools for easily verifying important dates in history thanks to numerous practical examples like Jesus' birth on Monday 29 September 2 BCE, Herod's death on Monday 26 January 1 BCE, the destruction of Jerusalem's Temple on Sunday 27 August 587 BCE, the first fall of Babylon soon after April 1499 BCE, etc.

Depositional facies correlation and petrophysical evaluation of Bosso Field was carried out to generate part of the information required for profitable development of the field. Exaggerated reservoir continuity and grouping of genetically unrelated reservoirs commonly result from the traditional method of depositional facies correlation that is based on similar lithologies and paleontological events. Wells drilled on the basis of the results from such correlations are sometimes dry, and the asset operator suffers colossal financial loss. The conventional technique of determining porosity correction linearly from gamma ray index yields inaccurate effective porosity values in Tertiary shaly sand reservoirs, and ultimately misleading reserve estimates. The study was performed using Halliburton’s Geographix® DiscoveryTM  5000.0.0.0 software, open-hole geophysical logs acquired from six wells named BO-1, BO-2, BO-4, BO-5, BO-6 and BO-7. Benin Formation was delineated from Agbada Formation on the basis of gamma ray log variation pattern, resistivity values and shale thickness. The top of Agbada Formation was penetrated at 7,878 ft (2,403 m), 7,929ft (2,418 m), 7,845 ft (2,393 m), 7,873 ft (2,401 m), 7,867 ft (2,399 m) and 7,930 ft (2,419 m) in wells BO-2, BO-6, BO-1, BO-5, BO-7 and BO-4 respectively. Akata Formation was penetrated only at BO-1 and BO-6. Marine flooding surfaces were utilised in dividing the Agbada Formation into six parasequences which were correlated across the well logs. The parasequences were all progradational. Three hydrocarbon reservoirs named A, B, C were identified and correlated within the parasequences. Effective porosity was obtained using Larionov formula and hydrocarbon saturations were obtained using the Indonesian method. Permeability was estimated using Timur’s equation. Hydrocarbon volume per unit reservoir volume of each reservoir was obtained as the product of hydrocarbon saturation and reservoir thickness. Sand 6B (Sand B in BO-6) had the highest hydrocarbon saturation values of 0.773. Sand 5B (Sand B in BO-5) had the lowest hydrocarbon saturation of 0.62. Sand 6B yielded the highest permeability (20,686 mD) while lowest permeability value (1,452 mD) was obtained in Sand 5C. Sand 5A (Sand A in BO-5) had the highest hydrocarbon volume per unit reservoir volume of 501.21 while Sand 4C (Sand C in BO-4) had the lowest value of 69.09. The work revealed opportunities for infill well drilling between BO-5 and BO-1, as well as between BO-5 and BO-4 for increased production from Sand C. Opportunities for infill well drilling for increased production from Sands A and B were also revealed between BO-1 and BO-4, and between BO-5 and BO-4.

Abstract The potential habitability of newly discovered exoplanets is initially assessed by determining whether their orbits fall within the circumstellar habitable zone of their star. However, the habitable zone (HZ) is not static in time or space, and its boundaries migrate outward at a rate proportional to the increase in luminosity of a star undergoing stellar evolution, possibly including or excluding planets over the course of the star's main sequence lifetime. We describe the time that a planet spends within the HZ as its "habitable zone lifetime." The HZ lifetime of a planet has strong astrobiological implications and is especially important when considering the evolution of complex life, which is likely to require a longer residence time within the HZ. Here, we present results from a simple model built to investigate the evolution of the "classic" HZ over time, while also providing estimates for the evolution of stellar luminosity over time in order ...

First published by Klaudio Zic Publications, 2008, www.lulu.com/astrology. Copyright © 2008 by Klaudio Zic. All Rights Reserved. No part of this abstract may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or otherwise, for commercial purposes or otherwise, without the written permission of the author, except when permitted by law.

ZODIACAL INFORMATION

KLAUDIO ZIC
Academy for RTRRT and Scientific Astrology

ABSTRACT
The Academy of Scientific Astrology is based on astronomic principles confirming to the IAU convention. The calculations are performed on the HORIZONS integrator by Jon Giorgini of NASA JPL, Pasadena CA.
Subject headings: solar system – Academic Zodiac, astronomy – precession, religion – planetary exorcism
Online material: www.lulu.com/astrology http://youtube.com/astrology2012 http://youtube.com/RTRRTV

Amo 5:8  seek him that made the Pleiades and Orion, and turneth the shadow of death into the morning, and maketh the day dark with night; that calleth for the waters of the sea, and poureth them out upon the face of the earth: Jehovah is his name.

1. MOTIVATION


In the age of Cetus, our scientists uncover our distant past through walking snakes and whales1. A fossil is information. Information often requires further interpretation, sometimes even when simple and direct. We assume that the position of the sun is an information of interest to many. It will be immediately apparent that information is classified according to authority, namely NASA JPL. When an authority issues information, there is no doubt as to its efficaciousness as well as correctness. In extension, information, when properly applied, fertilizes the original human mind. On the other hand, misinformation binds the mind in the dungeons of darkness and superstition. Only a short ephemeris strip will provide more information than all superstition through ages, as well as stir exorcism in a crooked mind beset by dark superstition. The superstitious   

2. PROBLEM

Information travels like seed. If it falls on fertile ground, it will bloom, while if it slips towards barren minds, it will hardly produce any effect. In order to make gold, one must have at least a little gold oneself. In acquiring information, one must possess at least one happy thought an infinitesimal parcel of one’s original mind. A true mind is hard to find, as most human minds lie suffocated under the burden of false ego. The hermit seeks human beings with the help of a lamp. Ecce homo. False ego is an install, quite incapable of any magickal feat. The default ego victimizes humankind. Without that ego, humankind would not suffer death at all. This precise ego is marked for deletion according to the bible and the reality-rendering project. 

3. APPROACH

In order to exemplify information as function of planetary exorcism, we presented the astrological community with an authoritative set of ephemeris, the NASA JPL HORIZONS ephemeris. These are readily available as national patrimony and racial legacy. As there can be no doubt as to the precision and accuracy of such an ephemeris, we used them in defining the zodiac. The result was the Academic Zodiac, an accurate as well as operative environment for qualified astronomical as well as astrological praxis.

4. RESULTS

The results of our research are enlisted as follow.

The easiest way in one’s own progress is the acceptance of authority. As one’s often cherished mind is not one’s own at all, authority is called in dispelling doubts.
You decide when to walk or when to sit, but you do not decide when to think. Moreover, no one can stop thinking2. If default mind would be our own, we would be able to switch it off and on at will.
In order to absorb information, one relaxes into non-thinking. A second of non-thinking is worth an eternity. It is eternity!
Time and space are just concepts like any, as unzipped by the true mind distiller3.
Inspection shows that there are 22 zodiacal constellations. When scanned and packed together, they form the Academic Zodiac.
Precession has 16 rising constellations at east at the present epoch.
Some of the zodiacal constellations are occasionally overlapping with the zodiacal constellations.
Several zodiacal constellations do not rise at east at the present epoch, namely Aries, Gemini, Cancer, Libra, Scorpius, Sagittarius and Capricornus do not rise at east, and thus can not be labeled as ascendants.
Information is often packed within little capsules like this NASA ephemeris strip4 for the winter sun. The sun is still in Libra on November 23rd.

2008-Nov-23 00:00      Lib
2008-Nov-24 00:00      Sco
2008-Nov-25 00:00      Sco
2008-Nov-26 00:00      Sco
2008-Nov-27 00:00      Sco
2008-Nov-28 00:00      Sco
2008-Nov-29 00:00      Sco
2008-Nov-30 00:00      Oph
2008…
2008-Dec-17 00:00      Oph
2008-Dec-18 00:00      Sgr

A further zodiacal information is provided within a graphical example. It happens that the example is a typical horoscope printout for modern times. This setup includes all the major dwarf planets, including the recent discoveries. Note that such a printout was never available anywhere else. Eris sitting precisely on the NYC western horizon, or moon in Orion for the WTC are simply not part of any pseudo-astrological experience.
The horoscope of course shows 16 rising constellations5 as nested within the Cartesian house system. Thus, if the moon is rising in Cetus at east in your horoscope, Cetus is marked as ascendant and lord of the first house. On the other hand, if Venus in Hydra is rising at east, the longest zodiacal constellation will be visible at the ascendant in your horoscope.
In the graphical example, we observe recently discovered dwarf planets as neatly nested within the Cartesian house system. The wheel chart is for Pas de Calais 15886.
Eris is conjunct Masonic 2002 MS4 in the first house. While the lord of war, Mars is conjunct with 2006 QH181 precisely NE.
The example serves as unique map for the modern astrologer, in that it announces an expansion of our integrating capabilities. NASA is introducing a new integration model which would be able to calculate the accurate position for e.g. dwarf planets like 2007 OR10, even towards remote epochs.
As concern information, the map clearly stands as standard. Technically, we deal with an astronomical-astrological chart wheel as based on the Cartesian chart system. As all the new discoveries are automatically loaded, we gain a better perspective of the event. It is most exciting to discover our past as armed with the new discoveries, from giant comets to KELU-1 or the dwarf planets.
The map shows 2007 OR10 in the 10th Cartesian house, as aligned with the prominent Moon Uranus conjunction. Dr John Dee would give everything to have this map on his desk.
How do we use this map? If we associate 2007 OR10 with war waged and lost, we immediately have a warning for the current president of the USA, who has 2007 OR10 prominent in his own natal chart. Namely, the direction of 2007 OR10 in the map can be associated with the movement of the betrayed Armada fleet. Astrological maps clearly show the movement of troops. In our case, we would expect an attack from NE.
When properly projected, minute detail clearly shows in its strategic proportions. Thus, 2007 OR10 will mark a specific vessel coming from the London direction. We can even determine the name and speed of the vessel itself, as based on a recent discovery within the dwarf planet realm. This is more data than Dr John Dee ever had or needed.

5. DISCUSSION

The superstitious mind is a separate apparatus that is installed atop of the original, in order to suffocate it. The install pertains to the transcendental sphere, albeit intuition penetrates the mystery of the original sin. Children intuitively know not only that something is wrong, but also who and what is wrong, but are discouraged to claim their original mind, precisely by their already enslaved parents. Nevertheless, scientific is encouraged in an illuminated environment, from which true mind springs free as associated with objective science.

This paper almost complete, as I gather and transcribe notes and information. The good news is, this might now bring us closer to identifying the unknown Semitic language of the Voynich Manuscript, as some of these stars have names very similar to Hebrew, Syrian, and Arabic ones. We will start with the star chart 68f. The Voynich Manuscript star charts are one of the most perplexing to solve or translate. Too many researchers have given up on their quest when only a few stars can be "proven" based on their translation, and others find fault with the process when every star cannot be clearly identified. History shows us that, when the Arabic names for stars were translated into Latin, many lost their intended meaning, proper names were lost in translation, some stars were given the name meant for another star, ancient cultural names were all but forgotten, and the pronunciation of the name, will vary from one area to another. "When the Arabic texts were translated into Latin beginning from the 12th century, the Arabic tradition of star names was passed down to the Latin world. However, this happened often in a highly corrupted form that either changed the meaning, or in extreme cases gave birth to words with no meaning at all. Other names were mistakenly transferred from one star to another, so that a name might even refer to a different constellation (Greek or Arabic) rather than to the one of the star's actual residence." http://muslimheritage.com/article/arabic-star-names-treasure-knowledge-shared-world Star chart 68f, as others have surmised, should be the four astronomical guardians or watchers of Persian influence, from the 'Book of fixed stars' by: Al-Rahman Al-Sufi first translated into Latin in the 12 th or 13 th century. Pleiades and Aldebaran are in the 10 o'clock position on the Voynich star chart, for the East guardians in the Constellation Taurus, marking the vernal equinox and representing the Persian God of Light, Ahura Mazda. Pleiades in the Voynich translates to: bridle of + gathering + at that time. Pleiades was known as a group of gathered stars. Aldebaran in the Voynich translates to: companion + compass about + ally. Aldebaran was known as the follower of Pleiades. Fomalhaut A and Fomalhaut B are in the 1 o'clock position on the Voynich star chart, for the South guardians in the Piscis Austrinus constellation under Aquarius, marking the Winter Solstice, and representing Persian God Zal. Mul Ku (the Fish) to the Babylonians. Fomalhaut A / Fum Al Hut {Arabic} for mouth of the fish. Voynich = Firepot/brother Lord Fish (if the very blurry letter is a d, second character from last). The star to the left of it translates to 'cloud' it is a dust ring composing Fomalhaut B not a planet.

Indigenous peoples across the world observe the motions and positions of stars to develop seasonal calendars. Additionally, changing properties of stars, such as their brightness and colour, are also used for predicting weather. Combining archival studies with ethnographic fieldwork in Australia’s Torres Strait, we explore the various ways Indigenous peoples utilise stellar scintillation (twinkling) as an indicator for predicting weather and seasonal change, discussing the scientific underpinnings of
this knowledge. By observing subtle changes in the ways the stars twinkle, Meriam people gauge changing trade winds, approaching wet weather, and temperature changes. We then explore how the Northern Dene of Arctic North America utilise stellar scintillation to forecast weather.

Here we discuss the different ways in which stars have been organized into groups and in which these groups have been endowed with meaning. Psychologists have studied how the human perceptual system organizes simple visual elements such as dots or contour fragments into groups, and within this literature constellation formation is often invoked as an example of perceptual grouping. To a good first approximation, the human visual system is invariant across cultures and therefore offers up similar candidate star groups to any two people observing the same region of the night sky. Given this foundation, culture then shapes which groups attract the shared attention of a community and the ways in which these groups are embedded in systems of stories.

The Solar system depends on one geometrical design
What does mean (One Geometrical Design)?
The solar planets move a s pieces of the chess game – each planet motion depends on mathematical calculations and geometrical rules in comparison to the other planets – and as in the chess game –the players are teams and enemies but all of them are members in the same battle and they consist its structure- no one moves individually or independently
It's the general idea – let's try to examine and test if it can be a fact
(1)
We accepted that (Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity Is Wrong In Logic) basically because – The planet should be created and moving by the same one force – means- the force which created the planet it causes its motion – otherwise this planet will be broken because 2 forces effect on it-
That tells, no planet moves by the sun gravity, because no planet be created by the sun gravity effect.
But why the sun be found in the solar system if it doesn't cause any planet motion?
And
How Does The Planet Move If The Sun Doesn't Cause That?
Shortly
The planet creation and motion depends on one force only and for that this planet creation and motion data be in harmony one another-
But - There are no 9 forces to cause the 9 planets creations and motions -  instead – it's just one force causes all planets creation and motion – this vision tells that – this one force uses a geometrical design to cause the planets creation and motion.

Briefly
One force causes all planets creation and motion by using One Geometrical Design to do these 2 jobs (the creation and motion)

(2)
What's This One Geometrical Design? Can We Discover It?
Let's see this idea
The solar planets and their distances be created from one energy – this one energy was in one geometrical design by that the planets be created by this One Geometrical Design. And this geometrical design controls the planets creation and motion data for that the planets data be created based on exact equations – we have discovered that and proves it before – because I have 5 equations based on which the planets data be created where we have explained before that the planet creation and motion data be similar to any plane or rocket creation data depends on exact equations to enable its motion to be done without negative effects.
By that – My 5 Equations Prove That The Planets Creation And Motion Depends On One Geometrical Design.
Notice (My 5 Equations Be Tested And Proved In Point No. 2)
Shortly,
My 5 equations prove one geometrical design be found behind the solar system 

(3)
Now do we realize this meaning (One Geometrical Design)?
The idea tells (from one energy the planets and their distances be created), can we have any particles be created from the same energy? from gamma ray electron and positron be created, also the male and female creatures refer to similar system of creation –
How do the 2 particles (or 2 creatures)  behave after creation? They have attraction for one another – What Does Mean Attraction?
The electron and position attraction will cause the annihilation and produce Gamma ray – but the (male and female) creatures give more wide of the attractions (forms)
Some one carries flowers for his wife – and so – why these flowers effect on their attraction?
From one energy the 2 particles are created and they have to produce this one energy one more time to save the cycle and give chance for more particles to be created – if the 2 particles be in fighting their energies will be consumed in vain losing their chance of existence and the other (potential) particles chance
Shortly
They have to be under attraction to cause a safety for themselves and for the potential  particles – I hope I can explain the idea
The planets motions agreement and integration is the necessary requirement for their existence and for (potential) lives existence – they are in full agreement –
And what,
A man and his wife live in happiness – what should they do to explain that?!
The dancing planets do different forms show the agreement and integration of their motions – they show their integration because their integration is the only hope to produce the original energy from which they are created and give safety for the cycle.
We are very near now
The planets motions forms be seen in phenomena – as eclipses – planets alignments- planets perpendicularity ….etc
These phenomena shows form of the integration of the planets motions which enable to produce the original energy one more time 
Let's use the solar eclipse as example to explain the idea
Eclipse Phenomenon
The sun, Earth and the moon create the conspiracy of the eclipse phenomena, they agreed together to be on one straight line (180 degrees)
Now (the designer) supports their conspiracy, and create the sun and moon diameters rate to be equal their distances rate to the Earth and by that we can see the sun disc = the moon disc and the eclipse can be occurred   
The motion be done by 3 players in comparison one another – that explains the meaning of "One Geometrical Design"
The planets creation data – for some unknown wonder – support the phenomenon by data proportionality 
The total solar eclipse be occurred and the beautiful sun be absent and return
An intelligent student asked me (What's The Result Of This Eclipse?)
I couldn't answer – The Sun Be Absent And Return – that's all
Why the 3 players interested so much to do this action? and why the designer changed the creation data to be in proportionality to enable the eclipse to be done? What a big deal behind?
A group of dancers do some beautiful piece of theater on stage, the people applaud strongly – The dancers did some motions only!!

Can This Dancing Depend On Geometrical Rule?
Can the eclipse be done based on Geometrical Rule?
Let’s examine to answer

(a)
(The sun diameter/ moon diameter) =(Earth orbital  distance / Earth moon distance)
And
Jupiter orbital distance = Earth orbital distance x 5.2
(5.1 degrees = The Moon Orbital Inclination)

(b)
2 x Jupiter orbital distance = Jupiter diameter x 10921 km (the moon circumference)
And
Jupiter (13.1km/s) moves during 10921 seconds a distance = 142984 km = Jupiter diameter

(c)
The sun diameter x the moon diameter = 4900 million km = Jupiter orbital circumference = Jupiter circumference x 10921 km
We see the moon circumference (10921  km) be used as a period of time (10921 s) for Jupiter motion – it's hard to explain how!
But
This data tells 2 information
First (the eclipse be done based on geometrical rules and calculations) second (the used geometrical rules are unknown) 
Shortly
About what does this writing argue?
The Argument
The planets and their distances be created of one energy and based on one geometrical design which causes their creations and motions –
The planets motion have to be in harmony to integrate their energies to produce the original energy from which they were created to save the cycle
By that, the planets move together in full agreement and harmony –
In their motions they create phenomenon caused by the one geometrical design they depend on and these phenomenon cause more geometrical effects for the solar system   
By that,
The planet be similar to a tube through which a water moves – but – the water here is similar to geometrical effects – because by these geometrical effects the planets do the phenomena and the phenomena itself cause more geometrical effects
The whole proves is required to show the continuous harmony and agreement without which the original energy will never be found and the cycle will be destroyed. 
Again
Shortly about what does this writing argue?

About the book of geometry
Because, the eclipse be created based on geometrical rule and the eclipse process causes more geometrical effects to be created on the solar system 
the book of geometry be written in the dancing planets phenomenon (eclipses, alignments, perpendicularity…etc)
the rules are unknown, for that we need to examine in details to discover them.

The physicist have seen nothing of the party – he simply supposed – all eclipses, alignments, perpendicularity.. etc be created by pure coincidences –
he wasn't invited to the party and the missed the whole dance.
We try to examine the planet motion as possible to know the fact.
Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department-  Physics & Mathematics  Faculty 
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow  (2010-2013)
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com, mrwaheid1@yahoo.com
gergesgerges@yandex.ru
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous
VK https://vk.com/id696655587
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges 
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar
Discord https://discord.gg/sgQFvUvT
Twitter https://twitter.com/GfTawdrous
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-FTawdrous

PUBLICATIONS
box  https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

Paper hypothesis
-The planets matters and their distances be created from The Same One Energy.
-This one energy is provided by one light beam
-This light beam travels with a velocity =1.16 million km per second 
Paper objective
-The paper is consisted of 2 parts
-Part no. (I) provides My Research Presentation Summary
-Part no. (II) discusses The Geometry Of Light Motion
-Let's refer to them in following..

Part No. (I) Research Presentation Summary
My research presentation is consisted of 6 points which are
(1)
Planet Orbital Distance Equation (My 1st Equation)
(2)
The Refutation Of Newton Theory Of The Sun Gravity
(No Planet moves by The Sun Gravity)
(3)
The Research Method explanation And Using to prove 2 basic new discoveries which are:
(Mars Migration Theory) and
(The moon using of an angle θ between its motion direction and its orbit level)   
(4)
The Research hypothesis (The planets matters and their distances be created from One Energy)
That's why (The Solar System Be Created Based On One Geometrical Design)
Means (One Geometrical Design was found before the solar system creation)
That refutes (The Big Bang Theory)
(5)
The One Energy Is Provided By One Light Beam
(6)
The light beam travels with a velocity 1.16 million km per second. 
That refutes (The hypothesis of the Special Theory of Relativity) 

Part No. (II) Geometry Of Light Motion
What's the direct question behind this paper?
The matter and space are created from one light beam – means – the matter and space are forms of light forms –
Now, if this is a fact,
Why do we need to fight so hard to prove this very simple and clear fact?
Because
The light uses unknown geometrical rules –

By that this paper should be similar to a book of Geometry – because – it shows types of geometrical rules are unknown for us and not found in our Geometry books

It's a direct answer but not clear
Why don't we know these rules? Why can't we catch them in lab experiments? If so many unknown geometrical rules of light motion are found, and we couldn't catch them during the empirical physics history why can we do that now? Can any one stole at end the Geometry book from the heaven library?! 

I have brought with me the planets data and later I have discovered that all unknown geometrical rules be hidden in them. 
Shortly
The light creates the matter and space by using unknown geometrical rules – and – we can discover these geometrical rules by using planets data analysis – means – we can know these geometrical rules only if we can read correctly the planets data – for example – if we can answer the question (why the moon diameter =3475 km?) that will help us to discover the rules based on which the moon diameter be created. 

So I will present my research summary then we should discuss these unknown geometrical rules.

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department-  Physics & Mathematics  Faculty 
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow  (2010-2013)
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com, mrwaheid1@yahoo.com
gergesgerges@yandex.ru
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous/
VK https://vk.com/id696655587
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges 
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar
Discord https://discord.gg/sgQFvUvT
Twitter https://twitter.com/GfTawdrous
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-FTawdrous

PUBLICATIONS
box  https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

Paper Discovery

-Planet Data Analysis should be considered the astrophysics research basic method. 
-The paper proves that – We have to use planets data analysis to discover how the solar system be created and moving – the method provides safe approaches to conclude the facts and protects from the imaginary ideas –
- On the other side –
- Planets data analysis method proves – The big bang theory is wrong and Newton theory of the sun gravity is wrong – (also the method proves one light beam its velocity 1.16 million km per second be found) –
- The method opens a new page in the physics book because it provides a new source of knowledge to discover how the solar system be created and moving.
- The paper provides a new concept tells
(Planet Data Be Created Based On Geometrical Rules And Exact Equations) 
And (One Law Controls All Planets Data)
- Based on this new concept – Planet Data Analysis can show The Geometrical Rules based on which this planet be created and moving.
- The paper explains and proves the idea shortly.

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department-  Physics & Mathematics  Faculty 
Peoples' Friendship university of Russia – Moscow  (a former student 2010-2013)
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com, mrwaheid1@yahoo.com
gergesgerges@yandex.ru
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous/
VK https://vk.com/id696655587
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges 
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Livejournal https://gerges2022.livejournal.com/profile
Pocket https://getpocket.com/@646g8dZ0p3aX5Ad1bsTr4d9THjA5p6a5b2fX99zd54g221E4bs76eBdtf6aJw5d0?src=navbar
Discord https://discord.gg/sgQFvUvT
Twitter https://twitter.com/GfTawdrous
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-FTawdrous

PUBLICATIONS
box  https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

강원랜드블랙잭〃〃GCN333。COM〃〃한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-강원랜드블랙잭-한빛경마-

The Paper outlines why adopting cross-hemisphere lunar observations for each and every lunar month is untenable within Islamic Law. The Paper uses Australia-Malaysia example, as well as outlines the chronological history of the development of lunar observation criteria in Malaysia.

Human beings have a multifaceted quantum structure. The factors that constitute and develop human beings leads to a multi-dimensional outcome. Accordingly, each and every action of a person results in a positive and negative impact. For example, nutrition contributes to human beings, but it can also cause negative formations in humans. There is a direct relationship between nutrition and consciousness. Eating more than required impacts on the functionality of consciousness. Likewise, excessive nutrition leads to the formation of toxic gases in the human body. Such gases prevent consciousness from
transforming into higher consciousness. Consciousness is the light. Such gases restrain the light. Considering that human cells produce light, the human body both produces and benefits from such light. Beings in the universe have a consciousness that is light. Beings
in the universe interact with each other by means of such light, which is consciousness. This is actualized in virtue of such light, which is referred to as consciousness. Such light, consciousness, reaches the fetus through the placenta. As a matter of fact, there are similarities between the formation of the universe and the formation of the fetus.
Keywords: Placenta; Nutrition; Gases; Consciousness; Higher Consciousness; Light

Astronomia antigua. La Esfera Celeste. Constelaciones. Sistemas de Coordenadas. Posiciones caracteristicas del Sol. Movimiento anual del Sol y estaciones del año. Medidas del Tiempo. Precesion del eje de la Tierra. La Luna. Eclipses. Movimiento de los Planetas. Sistema solar. Teoria de la Radiacion. Galaxias. Origen de la vida y vida extraterrestre. El universo. Telescopios.

This investigation explores the emergence of ancient astronomical systems of knowledge at the site of Cerros, Belize. We argue that the ancient Maya of Cerros early on observed features in the coastal landscape that marked zenith events, and over time they constructed buildings to memorialize this observation point on a unique promontory at the site. As the site grew, the system of observation at Cerros developed into a form of architecture that only elites could access, thus creating a separate privileged form of knowledge. Later construction marked other important horizon events, most notably the spring equinox. The architecture itself became a form of landscape that helped mould their ceremonial activities. Using three-dimensional reconstructions of the site based on recorded archaeological data, we focus on how the Maya at Cerros developed an astronomically influenced cosmological system.

Presentation for the Center for Eastern Mediterranean Studies of the Central European University in Vienna, 27 January 2022, 5:30 pm: https://events.ceu.edu/2022-01-27/signs-end-times-turn-first-millennium-ad-oort-minimum-and-natural-disasters-byzantine

Abstract: The turn of the first Millennium AD among some Christian communities related to apocalyptic expectation. These fears and hopes clustered not only in the decades before and after the year 1000 AD, but also at later dates throughout the 11th century, such as around 1030 AD (one thousand years after the crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus Christ) or around 1064/1065 AD (based on calculations on a recurrence of the same Easter date as in the year of the resurrection). Such speculations motivated authors in the Medieval West, in the Byzantine Empire (such as Leon Diakonos) or in Armenia (such as Matthew of Edessa). Furthermore, in the same period, but based on different chronologies, expectations of a turn of times arose among Islamic communities (such as in some circles of the al-Ismāʿīlīya) as well in parts of the Buddhist world (connected with ideas of a “Degenerate Age of Dharma”, in Japanese mappō).

To illustrate and support their visions of history and current affairs, these authors interpreted celestial signs (such as the sighting of Halley's Comet in 1066), extreme meteorological phenomena (droughts, floods) and other disasters (such as earthquakes) as portents of the imminent apocalypse. In fact, modern historical climatology identified an increase of the frequency of extreme events across Afro-Eurasia from Western Europe to China, which can be partly related to the “Oort Minimum” of solar activity between 1010 and 1080 CE. These natural phenomena, however, were not the cause for apocalyptic expectations, but selectively integrated by the authors of the time in their texts. Based on individual narrative strategies, more or fewer calamities were reported for specific periods or rulers in more or less detail. As the paper demonstrates, a comparison between different texts and historiographies as well as between the “archives of society” and the “archives of nature” allows us to “triangulate” the actual extent and impact of some of these extreme events. At the same time, it becomes clear that historical sources cannot be used just as another type of environmental data without considering the intentions of their composition, as is still often the case in studies done by natural scientists on their own.

"The traditional date of 1595 BCE for the destruction of Babylon by the Hittite king Mursili I is accepted by most historians for many years despite notable controversies. This pivotal date is considered crucial to the various calculations of the early chronology of the ancient Near East. According to the Venus Tablet (Enuma Anu Enlil 63) which describes the rising and setting of Venus during the reign of Ammisaduqa, there are only four possibilities implying four dates for the destruction of Ur: 1912, 1944, 2004, 2064 BCE. However, a tablet of astronomical omens (Enuma Anu Enlil 20) mentions a lunar eclipse, dated 14/III/48, at the end of the reign of Shulgi and another (Enuma Anu Enlil 21) mentions a lunar eclipse, dated 14/XII/24, at the end of the reign of Ibbi-Sin. Over the period 2200-1850 BCE there are only three pairs of eclipses, spaced by 42 years, matching the description of astronomical omens but only one agreeing with the previous four dates. Despite the excellent agreement the date of 1499 BCE is considered too low compared to Kassite and Hittite chronologies.
The second way to check the date for the fall of Babylon is to rebuild the chronology of this period thanks to synchronisms dated by astronomy from Assyrian, Babylonian, Egyptian and Israelite chronologies which provide synchronisms that can be dated independently. The Mesopotamian chronology of this period is reconstructed using the number of Assyrian eponyms (one a year) and the length of Babylonian reigns combined with the set of synchronisms among Assyrian and Babylonian kings in Annals. Consequently, the reign of Kassite King Gandash" (1661-1635), obtained from average durations, coincides with the reign of the Assyrian king Samsu-iluna (1654-1616) and Sealand king Ilum-maz-ilî (1664- 1594). In addition, the reign of Kassite King Agum II (1503-1487) and Sealand King Ayadaragalama (1498-1482) are consistent with a fall of Babylon in 1499 BCE. During the reign of Assur-dân I (1179-1133) eponyms began on 1st Nisan instead of 1 Sippu, but Assyrian lunar years without intercalation remained the norm until Tiglath-pileser I. As the Babylonian year began on 1st Nisan (shortly after the spring equinox), Assyrian years coincided with Babylonian lunar years with intercalation, thus the period between Assur-dân I and Tiglath-pileser I was therefore transitional.
Owing to the Babylonian chronology and synchronisms it is possible to date other chronologies (Egyptian, Elamite, Hittite and Mitannian). As lunar day 1, called psdntyw "shining ones", has played a major role in Egyptian religious celebrations, it is regularly quoted in ancient documents, which sometimes also date it in the civil calendar. This double-dating then allows an absolute dating, on condition that provided proper identification of the moon phase for that particular day. Present specialists rely on the work of Parker (in 1950) who defined this day as a first invisibility, that is to say the day (invisible!) just before the first lunar crescent. However in the papyrus Louvre 7848 containing a double date, lunar and civil, in the year 44 of Amasis, the first date (II Shemu 13) is lunar and the second (I Shemu 15) is civil and as the civil date fell on 21 September 558 BCE the lunar date fell on 9 (= 21 – 12) September 558 BCE which was a full moon day according to astronomy, not first invisibility! The lunar calendar at Elephantine with its system of double dates (Egyptian and Babylonian) used by Persians officials and Jewish scribes from 500 to 400 BCE confirms that the Egyptian lunar day 1 was a full moon (see Dating the Reign of Xerxes and Artaxerxes)."

The moon played a major role in the ancient Middle Eastern world as a celestial body, as a material measure of time and temporality, as a site for predicting the future, and as a benevolent god of abundance, prosperity, and in certain places, even healing. In this essay, I discuss both the veneration and the visualization of the moon in Pre-Islamic (ritual) contexts to provide a visual-historical biography of the moon, which was imagined both as a divine presence and as a cosmic actor. For the sake of brevity and coherence, I will focus on the ancient Mesopotamian engagements with the moon during the Bronze and Iron Ages, and pursue the very popular cult of the moon in Hellenistic and Roman Anatolia. In doing so, as an art historian, my biased focus is on the various apparitions of the moon on monuments, works of art, and
the artifacts of visual culture, which will help me narrate its story. Contrary to the modern scientific vision of the moon as a “lifeless, rocky satellite,”3 the protagonist of this new materialist tale is no less than a major cosmic actor, a vibrant and powerful god who shaped and safeguarded the everyday life and fate of humanity. New materialism urges us to return to the matter, liberating it as much as possible from the ontological straitjacket of anthropocentric idealism, symbolism, and classification.

Paper Discovery 
-Planets data be created based on exact equations and mathematical calculations and doesn't depend on any (historical unknown factors or initial conditions)
-As a result, Planets creation and motion data can be concluded theoretically without observation because it's created based on mathematical equations
-I provide 3 new equations and use one more equation based on Kepler law, by these 4 equations using we can conclude All planets orbital distances, periods, velocities, inclinations, rotation periods, diameters, masses and axial tilts…
-This Data Can Be Concluded Theoretically Without Observation.     
-The paper tests these 4 equations and proves this discovery

Paper Theory
- The Solar system be created based on One Geometrical Design. 
- Means, based on one design all planets creation and motion data be created and by that the planets be parts in one building (or members in one body)
- Can one law control all planets creation and motion data?
- Let's suppose, The Planets Move A Unified Motion (as a machine of gears). This unified motion will force each planet to move a complementary motion to others' to enable the unified motion to be created.
- Planet data should be in consistency with its motion – otherwise – this planet will be destroyed. Means, if planets motions be complementary one another that will cause these planets creation and motion data to be complementary one another, by this vision, One Law controls all planets creation and motion data       
- The paper theory tells, the solar system be created based on one geometrical design and be controlled by one law, for that reason the planets data be created based on exact equations – let's refer to these 4 equations in following 

- My (1st Equation) d2 = 4d0 ( d- d0) 
- d = Planet Orbital Distance  d0= Its Previous Planet Orbital Distance
- the equation tells each planet orbital distance depends on its neighbor

- (Kepler Law) Equation (v1/v2)2 = (d2/d1)
- v = Planet Velocity d= Planet Orbital Distance 
- The equation tells planet orbit defines its velocity

- My (2nd Equation) (v1/v2) = (s/r) = I
- v = Planet velocity and r= a diameter of one of the 2 planets
- s= the planet rotation periods number in its orbital period
- (The value "s" is belonged to the planet whose diameter is "r")
- I= Planet orbital inclination (of the planet whose diameter is "r")
- The equation tells based on planets velocities rate, planet diameter and its rotation period be defined- 

- My (3rd Equation) (v1v2) = 322
- The equation tells Planets velocities are complementary one another based on the rate 322 –
- The paper theory tells, the solar system depends on one geometrical design, in this design Mercury be the origin point and Jupiter orbital circumference be the main distance of the solar system – the paper explains that in details

Paper Argument
- The paper argues, the solar planets matters and their distances be created of energy of one light beam. The matter doesn't separate its light parent but move together by using different rates of time, means, the solar system be created of one light beam, and because of that, the solar system data depends on one geometrical design and that causes Planets data to be created based on exact equations and mathematical calculations.
- This light beam energy be registered in the planets matters and their distances data by that this light beam can be discovered by planets data analysis
Paper hypotheses
- (1)
- Planet Motion Depends On Light Motion
- (2)
- A light beam its velocity 1.16 million km per second be found in the solar system
- (This velocity is registered in the planets and distances data)
- The paper proves these hypotheses

Paper question
- Why Should We Refuse Newton Theory Of The Sun Mass Gravity?
- Because
- No Planet moves by the sun mass gravity, the solar planets move depending on light motion.
Paper theory applicability
- If Planets be created by collisions among themselves (as the moon case) how their data can be created based on exact equations and mathematical calculations?
- The matter is created out of light beam. We see rigid body but this rigid body is created out of light beam and moves with it. As in the double production, from Gamma ray be produed electron and position, 2 particel  equal in mass different in charges – the data be defined before the experiment.
Paper theory application
- In what can we use this theory of One Geometrical Design?
- We can use it to explain the moon orbital motion – let's summarize it here:

- The moon daily displacement =88000 km, during 29.53days (the moon day period) the displacements total be =2.598 mkm = 2π x 413600 km  This data tells 2 facts
- (1st Fact), The moon orbital apogee radius should be 413600 km
- (2nd Fact), The moon should revolve around the Earth through this apogee orbit with radius (r= 413600 km) only and can't revolve  through any more near orbit because of the long displacement daily (88000 km).
- Both conclusions are unreal because
- The moon orbital apogee radius (r= 406000 km) only and the moon can revolve around the Earth through more near orbits and can reach even to the perigee orbit (r= 363000 km).
- How does the moon do that?
- The intelligent moon creates an angle (θ) between its motion direction and its orbit horizontal level, by that the real displacement (L = 88000 cos θ) be shorter than (88000 km) and that enable the moon to decrease its apogee radius from 413600 km to 406000 km and enable it to revolve around the Earth through more near orbit. By that the moon can reach even to perigee radius (r= 363000km) 

- 413600 km cos (θ) = 406000 km where (θ =10.96 degrees),
- Let's ask, If the moon has this intelligent technique why the apogee radius be 406000 km? Why not be shorter? From where the moon found this angle (θ =10.96 degrees)? (from Uranus!)
- The explanation of this data depends on the solar system one design and can't be explained by any other theory. (the paper explains the moon motion)

Gerges Francis Tawdrous +201022532292
Physics Department-  Physics & Mathematics  Faculty 
Curriculum Vitae http://vixra.org/abs/1902.0044
E-mail mrwaheid@gmail.com
Twitter https://twitter.com/GfTawdrous
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/gergis.tawadrous/
VK https://vk.com/id696655587
Tumblr https://www.tumblr.com/blog/itsgerges 
Discord https://discord.gg/sgQFvUvT
Researcherid https://publons.com/researcher/3510834/gerges-tawadrous/
ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1041-7147
Google https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=2Y4ZdTUAAAAJ&hl=en
Quora https://www.quora.com/profile/Gerges-FTawdrous
box  https://app.box.com/s/47fwd0gshir636xt0i3wpso8lvvl8vnv
Academia https://rudn.academia.edu/GergesTawadrous
List of publications http://vixra.org/author/gerges_francis_tawdrous
Slideshare https://www.slideshare.net/Gergesfrancis

The dating system currently in use is that of the Gregorian calendar, which reformed the Julian calendar by abolishing 10 days in October 1582 and reducing leap years every three centenary years out of four, to realign the equinox and the full moon at solar and lunar cycle. The discontinuity of the 10 days is bridged extending backward the calendar, in the period before its introduction, obtaining the Proleptic Gregorian Calendar. The date identifies each day in this calendar with three integers, year/month/day. Below is a problem that seems simple but is actually quite complex, an algorithm to determine the days between two dates in the Proleptic Gregorian Calendar, which allows you to control the type of calculation performed and extend the limits of some current procedures.