Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
The Effect of Within-Sector, Upstream and Downstream Energy Taxes on Innovation and Productivity. (2014). Marin, Giovanni ; Franco, Chiara .
In: SEEDS Working Papers.
RePEc:srt:wpaper:0214.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 3

Citations received by this document

Cites: 28

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Environmental regulation and environmental productivity: The case of China. (2016). Shen, Neng ; Wang, Yan.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:62:y:2016:i:c:p:758-766.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. How MNEs respond to environmental regulation: integrating the Porter hypothesis and the pollution haven hypothesis. (2015). D'Agostino, Lorena ; Dagostino, Lorena .
    In: Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics.
    RePEc:spr:epolit:v:32:y:2015:i:2:p:245-269.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Carbon dioxide reducing environmental innovations, sector upstream/downstream integration and policy: evidence from the EU. (2015). Nicolli, Francesco ; mancinelli, susanna ; Mazzanti, Massimiliano ; Marin, Giovanni.
    In: Empirica.
    RePEc:kap:empiri:v:42:y:2015:i:4:p:709-735.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Alpay, E., S. Buccola, and J. Kerkvliet (2002). Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and U.S. food manufacturing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84(4), 887–901.

  2. Arimura, T., A. Hibiki, and N. Johnstone (2007). An empirical study of environmental R&D: what encourages facilities to be environmentally innovative. In Environmental Policy and Corporate Behaviour. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

  3. Brunnermeier, S. B. and M. A. Cohen (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45, 278–293.

  4. Carrion-Flores, C. E. and R. Innes (2010, January). Environmental innovation and environmental performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 59(1), 27–42.

  5. Ghisetti, C. and F. Quatraro (2013). Beyond inducement in climate change: Does environmental performance spur environmental technologies? a regional analysis of cross-sectoral di↵erences. Ecological Economics (Forthcoming) .

  6. Gollop, F. M. and M. J. Roberts (1983, August). Environmental regulations and productivity growth: The case of fossil-fueled electric power generation. Journal of Political Economy 91(4), 654–74.

  7. Gray, W. B. and R. J. Shadbegian (1998). Environmental regulation, investment timing, and technology choice. Journal of Industrial Economics 46(2), 235–56.

  8. Gray, W. B. and R. J. Shadbegian (2003). Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46(3), 384–402.

  9. Greaker, M. (2006). Spillovers in the development of new pollution abatement technology: A new look at the Porter-hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52(1), 411–420.

  10. Greaker, M. and K. E. Rosendahl (2008). Environmental policy with upstream pollution abatement technology firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 56(3), 246–259.

  11. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey.

  12. Hamamoto, M. (2006). Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics 28, 299–312.

  13. Heyes, A. and S. Kapur (2011). Regulatory attitudes and environmental innovation in a model combining internal and external R&D. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 61(3), 327–340.

  14. Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust standard errors for panel regressions with crosssectional dependence. The Stata Journal 7, 281–312.

  15. Ja↵e, A. and K. Palmer (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study. Review of Economics and Statistics 79 (4), 610–619.

  16. Ja↵e, A. B. and R. N. Stavins (1995, November). Dynamic incentives of environmental regulations: The e↵ects of alternative policy instruments on technology di↵usion. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29(3), S43–S63.

  17. Kneller, R. and E. Manderson (2012). Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics 34(2), 211–235.

  18. Lanoie, P., J. Laurent-Lucchetti, N. Johnstone, and S. Ambec (2011). Environmental policy, innovation and performance: New insights on the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 20(3), 803– 842.

  19. Lanoie, P., M. Patry, and r. Lajeunesse (2008). Environmental regulation and productivity: New findings on the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Productivity Analysis 30, 121–128.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  20. Leiter, A. M., A. Parolini, and H. Winner (2011). Environmental regulation and investment: Evidence from European industry data. Ecological Economics 70(4), 759–770.

  21. Lybbert, T. J. and N. J. Zolas (2013). Getting patents and economic data to speak to each other: An ‘algorithmic links with probabilities’ approach for joint analyses of patenting and economic activity. Research Policy (In press).

  22. Popp, D. (2006). International innovation and di↵usion of air pollution control technologies: the e↵ects of NOX and SO2 regulation in the US, Japan, and Germany. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 51(1), 46–71.

  23. Preacher, K. J. and A. F. Hayes (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect e↵ects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40, 879–891.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Preacher, K. J., D. D. Rucker, and A. F. Hayes (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research 42, 185–227.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Schmoch, U., F. Laville, P. Patel, and R. Frietsch (2003). Linking technology areas to industrial sectors. Final report to the european commission, DG Reasearch European Commission.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Shadbegian, R. J. and W. B. Gray (2005, August). Pollution abatement expenditures and plant-level productivity: A production function approach. Ecological Economics 54(2-3), 196–208.

  27. Xing, Y. and C. Kolstad (2002, January). Do lax environmental regulations attract foreign investment? Environmental & Resource Economics 21(1), 1–22.

  28. Yang, C.-H., Y.-H. Tseng, and C.-P. Chen (2012). Environmental regulations, induced R&D, and productivity: Evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics 34(4), 514–532.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. How do governance factors affect inefficiency? Stochastic frontier analysis of public utility firms in Japan. (2017). Mizutani, Fumitoshi ; Nakamura, Eri.
    In: Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics.
    RePEc:spr:epolin:v:44:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s40812-016-0066-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness. (2017). Sato, Misato ; Dechezleprêtre, Antoine ; Dechezlepretre, Antoine.
    In: Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:oup:renvpo:v:11:y:2017:i:2:p:183-206..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. How Does Environmental Regulation Shape Economic Development? A Tax Competition Model of China.. (2017). Swanson, Timothy ; Guimaraes Naso, Pedro ; Author, Pedro Naso.
    In: CIES Research Paper series.
    RePEc:gii:ciesrp:cies_rp_54.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The Porter Hypothesis Goes to China: Spatial Development, Environmental Regulation and Productivity.. (2017). Swanson, Timothy ; Guimaraes Naso, Pedro ; Huang, YI.
    In: CIES Research Paper series.
    RePEc:gii:ciesrp:cies_rp_53.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Optimal Environmental Regulation Intensity of Manufacturing Technology Innovation in View of Pollution Heterogeneity. (2017). Liu, Hu-Chen ; You, Jian-Xin ; Cao, Yu-Hong.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:7:p:1240-:d:104830.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms. (2017). Zipperer, Vera ; Kozluk, Tomasz ; ALBRIZIO, SILVIA.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:81:y:2017:i:c:p:209-226.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Different Types of Environmental Regulations and Heterogeneous Influence on “Green” Productivity: Evidence from China. (2017). Huang, Jing-Jing ; Yuan, Yi-Jun ; Xie, Rong-Hui .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:132:y:2017:i:c:p:104-112.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Does environmental policy stringency foster innovation and productivity in OECD countries?. (2016). Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada ; Morales-Lage, Rafael ; Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada ; Bengochea-Morancho, Aurelia .
    In: Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:cegedp:282.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Private standards and labour productivity in the food sector in Viet Nam. (2016). Trifkovic, Neda.
    In: WIDER Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:unu:wpaper:wp2016-163.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Exploring the impact of environmental regulation on economic growth, energy use, and CO2 emissions nexus in China. (2016). Zhang, Huan.
    In: Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards.
    RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:84:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2417-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Factors Affecting Inefficiency Level: Stochastic Frontier Analysis of Public Utility Firms in Japan. (2016). Mizutani, Fumitoshi ; Nakamura, Eri.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:kbb:dpaper:2016-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. “Effective regulatory stringency” and firms’ profitability: the effects of effluent limits and government monitoring. (2016). Earnhart, Dietrich ; Rassier, Dylan G.
    In: Journal of Regulatory Economics.
    RePEc:kap:regeco:v:50:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11149-016-9304-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Environmental regulation and environmental productivity: The case of China. (2016). Shen, Neng ; Wang, Yan.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:62:y:2016:i:c:p:758-766.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Productivity effects of eco-innovations using data on eco-patents. (2016). Marin, Giovanni ; Lotti, Francesca.
    In: Temi di discussione (Economic working papers).
    RePEc:bdi:wptemi:td_1067_16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Productivity Effects of Eco-innovations Using Data on Eco-patents. (2015). Marin, Giovanni ; Lotti, Francesca.
    In: SEEDS Working Papers.
    RePEc:srt:wpaper:1715.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. A Survey of the Literature on Environmental Innovation Based on Main Path Analysis. (2015). Nicolli, Francesco ; Marin, Giovanni ; Gilli, Marianna ; Ghisetti, Claudia ; Barbieri, Nicolò.
    In: SEEDS Working Papers.
    RePEc:srt:wpaper:0715.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. How MNEs respond to environmental regulation: integrating the Porter hypothesis and the pollution haven hypothesis. (2015). D'Agostino, Lorena ; Dagostino, Lorena .
    In: Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics.
    RePEc:spr:epolit:v:32:y:2015:i:2:p:245-269.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Environmental tax and productivity in a decentralized context: new findings on the Porter hypothesis. (2015). Zárate-Marco, Anabel ; Vallés-Giménez, Jaime ; Valles-Gimenez, Jaime ; Zarate-Marco, Anabel.
    In: European Journal of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:40:y:2015:i:2:p:313-339.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. (2015). Verdolini, Elena ; Galeotti, Marzio ; Rubashkina, Yana .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:83:y:2015:i:c:p:288-300.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Corporate governance, environmental regulations, and technological change. (2015). Sen, Suphi.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:80:y:2015:i:c:p:36-61.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Effects of environmental regulation on actual and expected profitability. (2015). Earnhart, Dietrich ; Rassier, Dylan G..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:112:y:2015:i:c:p:129-140.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. The Effect of Within-Sector, Upstream and Downstream Energy Taxes on Innovation and Productivity. (2014). Marin, Giovanni ; Franco, Chiara .
    In: SEEDS Working Papers.
    RePEc:srt:wpaper:0214.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Environmental investments and firms productivity: a closer look.. (2014). Marzucchi, Alberto ; Antonietti, Roberto.
    In: SEEDS Working Papers.
    RePEc:srt:wpaper:0114.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Green tangible investment strategies and export performance: A firm-level investigation. (2014). Marzucchi, Alberto ; Antonietti, Roberto.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:108:y:2014:i:c:p:150-161.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Regulation, Innovation and Technology Diffusion: Evidence from Building Energy Efficiency Standards in Germany. (2014). Rosenschon, Sebastian ; Michelsen, Claus ; El-Shagi, Makram.
    In: Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin.
    RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp1371.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?. (2013). Cohen, Mark ; Ambec, Stefan ; Elgie, Stewart ; Lanoie, Paul.
    In: Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:oup:renvpo:v:7:y:2013:i:1:p:2-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Regulation, Competition, Diversification, Governance and Costs: An Empirical Analysis of Public Utility and Manufacturing Firms in Japan. (2013). Mizutani, Fumitoshi ; Nakamura, Eri .
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:kbb:dpaper:2013-25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Green investment strategies and export performance: A firm-level investigation. (2013). Marzucchi, Alberto ; Antonietti, Roberto.
    In: INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ing:wpaper:201302.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Green Investment Strategies and Export Performance: A Firm-level Investigation. (2013). Marzucchi, Alberto ; Antonietti, Roberto.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2013.76.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. The Effect of Within-Sector, Upstream and Downstream Energy Taxes on Innovation and Productivity. (2013). Marin, Giovanni ; Franco, Chiara .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2013.103.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Green growth, technology and innovation. (2012). Dutz, Mark A. ; Sharma, Siddharth.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:5932.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Regulation and Firm Perception, Eco-Innovation and Firm Performance. (2012). Doran, Justin ; Ryan, Geraldine .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:44578.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries. (2012). Manderson, Edward ; Kneller, Richard.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:34:y:2012:i:2:p:211-235.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?. (2011). Cohen, Mark ; Ambec, Stefan ; Elgie, Stewart ; Lanoie, Paul.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-11-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Environmental policy and profitability: evidence from Swedish industry. (2010). Lundgren, Tommy ; Brannlund, Runar.
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:12:y:2010:i:1:p:59-78.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Does the Porter Hypothesis Explain Expected Future Financial Performance? The Effect of Clean Water Regulation on Chemical Manufacturing Firms. (2010). Earnhart, Dietrich.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:45:y:2010:i:3:p:353-377.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. A literature review on the links between environmental regulation and competitiveness. (2009). Oikonomou, Vlasis ; Frey, Marco ; Spijker, Eise ; Melis, Michela ; Testa, Francesco ; Iraldo, Fabio.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:sse:wpaper:200904.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Performance environnementale et économique de l’entreprise. (2009). Ambec, Stefan ; Lanoie, Paul.
    In: Économie et Prévision.
    RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2009_num_190_4_7996.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the porter hypothesis. (2008). Lajeunesse, Richard ; Lanoie, Paul ; Patry, Michel.
    In: Journal of Productivity Analysis.
    RePEc:kap:jproda:v:30:y:2008:i:2:p:121-128.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Environmental policy and profitability - Evidence from Swedish industry. (2008). Lundgren, Tommy ; Brannlund, Runar.
    In: Umeå Economic Studies.
    RePEc:hhs:umnees:0750.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Productivity and environmental regulations - A long run analysis of the Swedish industry. (2008). Brannlund, Runar.
    In: Umeå Economic Studies.
    RePEc:hhs:umnees:0728.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. The Environmental Porter Hypothesis: Theory, Evidence and a Model of Timing of Adoption. (2007). Ziesemer, Thomas ; Kriechel, Ben.
    In: MERIT Working Papers.
    RePEc:unm:unumer:2007024.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance : New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis. (2007). Laurent-Lucchetti, jérémy ; Johnstone, Nick ; Ambec, Stefan ; Lanoie, Paul.
    In: Cahiers de recherche.
    RePEc:iea:carech:0706.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Environmental policy, innovation and performance : new insights on the Porter hypothesis. (2007). Laurent-Lucchetti, jérémy ; Johnstone, Nick ; Ambec, Stefan ; Lanoie, P..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gbl:wpaper:200706.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. When and Why Does It Pay To Be Green?. (2007). Ambec, Stefan ; Lanoie, Paul.
    In: CIRANO Working Papers.
    RePEc:cir:cirwor:2007s-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis. (2007). Laurent-Lucchetti, jérémy ; Johnstone, Nick ; Ambec, Stefan ; Lanoie, Paul.
    In: CIRANO Working Papers.
    RePEc:cir:cirwor:2007s-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Environmental Regulations and Technological Change in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry. (2005). Managi, Shunsuke ; Jin, DI ; Grigalunas, Thomas A. ; Opaluch, SJames J..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:81:y:2005:i:2:p303-319.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Can Environmental Regulations be Good for Business? an Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis. (2005). Barla, Philippe ; Ambec, Stefan.
    In: Cahiers de recherche.
    RePEc:lvl:lagrcr:0505.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Can Environmental Regulations be Good for Business? an Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis. (2005). Barla, Philippe ; Ambec, Stefan.
    In: Cahiers de recherche.
    RePEc:lvl:laeccr:0505.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Reconsidering Environmental Policy: Prescriptive Consequentialism and Volitional Pragmatism. (2004). BROMLEY, DANIEL.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:28:y:2004:i:1:p:73-99.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-11-28 16:53:57 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.