Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Environmental policy and profitability - Evidence from Swedish industry. (2008). Lundgren, Tommy ; Brannlund, Runar.
In: Umeå Economic Studies.
RePEc:hhs:umnees:0750.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 28

Citations received by this document

Cites: 28

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Essays on Energy Efficiency, Environmental Regulation and Labor Demand in Swedish Industry. (2020). Amjadi, Golnaz.
    In: Umeå Economic Studies.
    RePEc:hhs:umnees:0982.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Transaction Costs of Upstream Versus Downstream Pricing of $$\hbox {CO}_{2}$$ CO 2 Emissions. (2019). Jaraite-Kažukauskė, Jūratė ; Coria, Jessica.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:72:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-018-0235-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Relating environmental performance with socioeconomic and cultural factors. (2018). HALKOS, GEORGE ; Zisiadou, Argyro.
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:20:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10018-017-0182-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Time substitution for environmental performance: The case of Swedish manufacturing. (2018). Fare, Rolf ; Bostian, Moriah ; Weber, William L ; Lundgren, Tommy ; Grosskopf, Shawna.
    In: Empirical Economics.
    RePEc:spr:empeco:v:54:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s00181-016-1180-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Environmental Regulation and Sustainable Competitiveness: Evaluating the Role of Firm-Level Green Investments in the Context of the Porter Hypothesis. (2018). Weche, John P. ; Stoever, Jana.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:70:y:2018:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-017-0128-5.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Can Environmental Regulations Promote Corporate Environmental Responsibility? Evidence from the Moderated Mediating Effect Model and an Empirical Study in China. (2018). Wei, Guo ; Tu, YU ; Peng, Benhong.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:641-:d:133963.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Do pollution abatement expenditures lead to higher productivity growth? Evidence from Greek manufacturing industries. (2017). Kounetas, Kostantinos ; Chatzistamoulou, Nikos ; Diagourtas, George .
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:19:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s10018-015-0135-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Effect of Environmental Regulation Stringency on the Pulp and Paper Industry. (2017). Lundmark, Robert ; Brolund, Johan.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:12:p:2323-:d:122721.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Environmental regulation and sustainable competitiveness: Evaluating the role of firm-level green investments in the context of the Porter hypothesis. (2016). Weche, John P. ; Stoever, Jana.
    In: Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc16:145671.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Time substitution for environmental performance: The case of Sweden manufacturing. (2016). Bostian, Moriah ; Weber, William L ; Lundgren, Tommy ; Grosskopf, Shawna ; Fare, Rolf.
    In: CERE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:slucer:2016_003.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Energy efficiency in Swedish industry. (2016). Zhang, Shanshan ; Zhou, Wenchao ; Lundgren, Tommy.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:55:y:2016:i:c:p:42-51.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Environmental regulation and sustainable competitiveness: Evaluating the role of firm-level green investments in the context of the Porter hypothesis. (2015). Weche, John P. ; Stoever, Jana ; Stover, Jana .
    In: HWWI Research Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:hwwirp:170.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Environmental regulation and sustainable competitiveness: Evaluating the role of firm-level green investments in the context of the Porter hypothesis. (2015). Weche, John P. ; Stoever, Jana.
    In: Working Paper Series in Economics.
    RePEc:lue:wpaper:351.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Climate policy, environmental performance, and profits. (2015). Marklund, Per-Olov ; Lundgren, Tommy.
    In: Journal of Productivity Analysis.
    RePEc:kap:jproda:v:44:y:2015:i:3:p:225-235.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The effects of climate policy on environmental expenditure and investment: evidence from Sweden. (2014). Kazukauskas, Andrius ; Jaraite-Kažukauskė, Jūratė ; Lundgren, Tommy.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:taf:teepxx:v:3:y:2014:i:2:p:148-166.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Are Environmentally Related Taxes Effective?. (2014). Miller, Sebastian ; Vela, Mauricio A.
    In: IDB Publications (Working Papers).
    RePEc:idb:brikps:4685.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Carbon intensity in production and the effects of climate policy—Evidence from Swedish industry. (2014). Marklund, Per-Olov ; Lundgren, Tommy ; Brannlund, Runar.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:67:y:2014:i:c:p:844-857.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The many traps of green technology promotion. (2013). Bréchet, Thierry ; Brechet, Thierry ; LY, Sylvette .
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:15:y:2013:i:1:p:73-91.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Testing the Porter hypothesis: the effects of environmental investments on efficiency in Swedish industry. (2013). Hammar, Henrik ; Broberg, Thomas ; Marklund, Per-Olov ; Samakovlis, Eva .
    In: Journal of Productivity Analysis.
    RePEc:kap:jproda:v:40:y:2013:i:1:p:43-56.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Carbon Prices and Incentives for Technological Development. (2013). Samakovlis, Eva ; Zhou, Wenchao ; Lundgren, Tommy ; Marklund, Per-Olov.
    In: CERE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:slucer:2013_004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Diffusion of environmental technologies: a patent citation analysis of glass melting and glass burners. (2012). Triebswetter, Ursula ; Rave, Tilmann ; Goetzke, Frank.
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:14:y:2012:i:2:p:189-217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Regulation and Firm Perception, Eco-Innovation and Firm Performance. (2012). Doran, Justin ; Ryan, Geraldine .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:44578.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Determinants of Environmental Expenditure and Investment: Evidence from Sweden. (2012). Kazukauskas, Andrius ; Jaraite-Kažukauskė, Jūratė ; Kaukauskas, Andrius ; Lundgren, Tommy.
    In: CERE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:slucer:2012_007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Environmental Performance and Climate Policy. (2011). Marklund, Per-Olov ; Lundgren, Tommy ; Brannlund, Runar.
    In: CERE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:slucer:2011_006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Environmental performance and climate policy. (2011). Marklund, Per-Olov ; Lundgren, Tommy ; Brannlund, Runar.
    In: Sustainable Investment and Corporate Governance Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhb:sicgwp:2011_001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Climate Policy and Profit Efficiency. (2010). Marklund, Per-Olov ; Lundgren, Tommy.
    In: CERE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:slucer:2010_011.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Does environmental leadership pay off for Swed-ish industry? - Analyzing the effects of environ-mental investments on efficiency. (2010). Hammar, Henrik ; Samakovlis, Eva ; Broberg, Thomas ; Marklund, Per-Olov.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:nierwp:0119.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Climate Policy and Profit Efficiency. (2010). Marklund, Per-Olov ; Lundgren, Tommy.
    In: Sustainable Investment and Corporate Governance Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhb:sicgwp:2010_012.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Alpay, E., Buccola, S. and Kerkvliet, J. (2002). Productivity Growth and Environmental Regulation in Mexican and U.S. Food Manufacturing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(4), 887-901.

  2. Barbera, A.J. and McConnell, V. D. (1990). The Impact of Environmental Regulations on Industry Productivity: Direct and Indirect Effects. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18, 50-65.

  3. Berman, E. and Bui, L.T.M. (2001). Environmental regulation and productivity: evidence from oil refineries. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3): 498-5 10.

  4. Boyd, G A och J D McClelland (1999). The Impact of Environmental Constraints on Productivity Improvement in Integrated Paper Plants. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38, 121-42.

  5. Brännlund, R. and Lundgren, T. (2007). Swedish industry and Kyoto - An assessment of the effects of the European C02 emission trading system. Accepted for publication in Energy Policy.

  6. Brunnermeier, S.B. and Cohen, M.A. (2003). Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 45, 278-293.

  7. Brunnermeier, S.B. and Levinson, A. (2004). Examining the Evidence on Environmental Regulations and Industry Location. Journal of Environment and Development, 13, 6-41.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Cole M. A., R. J. Elliot (2007). Do Environmental Regulations Cost Jobs? An IndustryLevel Analysis of the UK, The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 7(1), article 28.

  9. Feichtinger, G., Hartl, R.F., Kort, P.M., and Veliov, V.M. (2005). Environmental policy, the porter hypothesis and the composition of capital: Effects of learning and technological progress. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50, 434-446.

  10. Gillingham K., R. G. Newell, W. A. Pizer (2007). Modeling Endogenous Technological Change for Climate Policy Analysis, Resources for the Future, DP 07-14. Forthcoming Energy Economics.

  11. Gollop, F.M. and Roberts, M.J. (1983). Environmental Regulations and Productivity Growth: The Case of Fossil-fuelled Electric Power Generation. Journal of Political Economy, 91, 654-674.

  12. Gray, W.B. and Shadbegian, R.J. (2003). Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46, 3 84-402.

  13. Greaker, M. (2006). Spillovers in the development of new pollution abatement technology: A new look at the Porter-hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 52, 1411-420.

  14. Hamamoto, M. (2006). Environmental Regulation and the Productivity of Japanes Manufacturing Industries. Resource and Energy Economics, 28, 299-3 12.

  15. Hammar, H., T. Lundgren, M. Sjöström (2008a). The significance of transport costs in Swedish forest industry, Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 42(1), 83-104.

  16. Hammar, H., T. Lundgren, M. Sjöström, M. Andersson (2008b). The kilometer tax and Swedish industry - Effects on industry sectors and regions, forthcoming Applied Economics.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  17. Jaffe A.B., K. Palmer (1997). Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 610-619.

  18. Jaffe A.B., S.R Peterson, P.R Portney, R.N Stavins. (1995). Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us? Journal of Economic Literature, XXXIII, 132-163.

  19. Mohr R. D. (2002). Technical Change, External Economies, and the Porter Hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 43, 158-168.

  20. Palmer, K., Oates, W.E. and Portney, P.R. (1995). Thightening Environmental Standards: The Benefit-Cost or the No-Cost Paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 119-132.

  21. Peretto P., (2008). Energy Taxes and Endogenous Technological Change, Journal of EnvironmentalEconomics and Management, forthcoming (accepted July 23, 2008).

  22. Piot-Lepetit I., M. Le Moing (2007), Environmental and Resource Economics 38, 433-446.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  23. Popp, D. (2002). Induced innovation and energy prices, American Economic Review, 92, 160-180.

  24. Popp, D. (2005). Lessons from patents: Using patents to measure technological change in environmental models. Ecological Economics, 54, 209-226 Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. The Free Press, New York.

  25. Romer P. (1990). Endogenous Technological Change, Journal of Political Economy 98, 71102.

  26. Simpson D. and Bradford, R. L. (1996). Taxing Variable Cost: Environmental Regulation as Industrial Policy. Journal of Environmental Economics and Managemen, 30, 282-300.

  27. Smith J.B. and Sims, W.A. (1985). The Impact of Pollution Charges on Productivity Growth in Canadian Brewing. The Rand Journal of Economics, 16, 410-423.

  28. Xepapadeas, A. and de Zeeuw, A. (1999). Environmental Policy and Competitiveness: The Porter Hypothesis and the Composition of Capital. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37, 165-182.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. How do governance factors affect inefficiency? Stochastic frontier analysis of public utility firms in Japan. (2017). Mizutani, Fumitoshi ; Nakamura, Eri.
    In: Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics.
    RePEc:spr:epolin:v:44:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s40812-016-0066-1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness. (2017). Sato, Misato ; Dechezleprêtre, Antoine ; Dechezlepretre, Antoine.
    In: Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:oup:renvpo:v:11:y:2017:i:2:p:183-206..

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. How Does Environmental Regulation Shape Economic Development? A Tax Competition Model of China.. (2017). Swanson, Timothy ; Guimaraes Naso, Pedro ; Author, Pedro Naso.
    In: CIES Research Paper series.
    RePEc:gii:ciesrp:cies_rp_54.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The Porter Hypothesis Goes to China: Spatial Development, Environmental Regulation and Productivity.. (2017). Swanson, Timothy ; Guimaraes Naso, Pedro ; Huang, YI.
    In: CIES Research Paper series.
    RePEc:gii:ciesrp:cies_rp_53.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Optimal Environmental Regulation Intensity of Manufacturing Technology Innovation in View of Pollution Heterogeneity. (2017). Liu, Hu-Chen ; You, Jian-Xin ; Cao, Yu-Hong.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:7:p:1240-:d:104830.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms. (2017). Zipperer, Vera ; Kozluk, Tomasz ; ALBRIZIO, SILVIA.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:81:y:2017:i:c:p:209-226.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Different Types of Environmental Regulations and Heterogeneous Influence on “Green” Productivity: Evidence from China. (2017). Huang, Jing-Jing ; Yuan, Yi-Jun ; Xie, Rong-Hui .
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:132:y:2017:i:c:p:104-112.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Does environmental policy stringency foster innovation and productivity in OECD countries?. (2016). Martínez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada ; Morales-Lage, Rafael ; Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada ; Bengochea-Morancho, Aurelia .
    In: Center for European, Governance and Economic Development Research Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:cegedp:282.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Private standards and labour productivity in the food sector in Viet Nam. (2016). Trifkovic, Neda.
    In: WIDER Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:unu:wpaper:wp2016-163.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Exploring the impact of environmental regulation on economic growth, energy use, and CO2 emissions nexus in China. (2016). Zhang, Huan.
    In: Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards.
    RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:84:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11069-016-2417-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Factors Affecting Inefficiency Level: Stochastic Frontier Analysis of Public Utility Firms in Japan. (2016). Mizutani, Fumitoshi ; Nakamura, Eri.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:kbb:dpaper:2016-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. “Effective regulatory stringency” and firms’ profitability: the effects of effluent limits and government monitoring. (2016). Earnhart, Dietrich ; Rassier, Dylan G.
    In: Journal of Regulatory Economics.
    RePEc:kap:regeco:v:50:y:2016:i:2:d:10.1007_s11149-016-9304-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Environmental regulation and environmental productivity: The case of China. (2016). Shen, Neng ; Wang, Yan.
    In: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.
    RePEc:eee:rensus:v:62:y:2016:i:c:p:758-766.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Productivity effects of eco-innovations using data on eco-patents. (2016). Marin, Giovanni ; Lotti, Francesca.
    In: Temi di discussione (Economic working papers).
    RePEc:bdi:wptemi:td_1067_16.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Productivity Effects of Eco-innovations Using Data on Eco-patents. (2015). Marin, Giovanni ; Lotti, Francesca.
    In: SEEDS Working Papers.
    RePEc:srt:wpaper:1715.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. A Survey of the Literature on Environmental Innovation Based on Main Path Analysis. (2015). Nicolli, Francesco ; Marin, Giovanni ; Gilli, Marianna ; Ghisetti, Claudia ; Barbieri, Nicolò.
    In: SEEDS Working Papers.
    RePEc:srt:wpaper:0715.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. How MNEs respond to environmental regulation: integrating the Porter hypothesis and the pollution haven hypothesis. (2015). D'Agostino, Lorena ; Dagostino, Lorena .
    In: Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics.
    RePEc:spr:epolit:v:32:y:2015:i:2:p:245-269.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Environmental tax and productivity in a decentralized context: new findings on the Porter hypothesis. (2015). Zárate-Marco, Anabel ; Vallés-Giménez, Jaime ; Valles-Gimenez, Jaime ; Zarate-Marco, Anabel.
    In: European Journal of Law and Economics.
    RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:40:y:2015:i:2:p:313-339.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. (2015). Verdolini, Elena ; Galeotti, Marzio ; Rubashkina, Yana .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:83:y:2015:i:c:p:288-300.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Corporate governance, environmental regulations, and technological change. (2015). Sen, Suphi.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:80:y:2015:i:c:p:36-61.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Effects of environmental regulation on actual and expected profitability. (2015). Earnhart, Dietrich ; Rassier, Dylan G..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:112:y:2015:i:c:p:129-140.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. The Effect of Within-Sector, Upstream and Downstream Energy Taxes on Innovation and Productivity. (2014). Marin, Giovanni ; Franco, Chiara .
    In: SEEDS Working Papers.
    RePEc:srt:wpaper:0214.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Environmental investments and firms productivity: a closer look.. (2014). Marzucchi, Alberto ; Antonietti, Roberto.
    In: SEEDS Working Papers.
    RePEc:srt:wpaper:0114.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Green tangible investment strategies and export performance: A firm-level investigation. (2014). Marzucchi, Alberto ; Antonietti, Roberto.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:108:y:2014:i:c:p:150-161.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Regulation, Innovation and Technology Diffusion: Evidence from Building Energy Efficiency Standards in Germany. (2014). Rosenschon, Sebastian ; Michelsen, Claus ; El-Shagi, Makram.
    In: Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin.
    RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp1371.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?. (2013). Cohen, Mark ; Ambec, Stefan ; Elgie, Stewart ; Lanoie, Paul.
    In: Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:oup:renvpo:v:7:y:2013:i:1:p:2-22.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Regulation, Competition, Diversification, Governance and Costs: An Empirical Analysis of Public Utility and Manufacturing Firms in Japan. (2013). Mizutani, Fumitoshi ; Nakamura, Eri .
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:kbb:dpaper:2013-25.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Green investment strategies and export performance: A firm-level investigation. (2013). Marzucchi, Alberto ; Antonietti, Roberto.
    In: INGENIO (CSIC-UPV) Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ing:wpaper:201302.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Green Investment Strategies and Export Performance: A Firm-level Investigation. (2013). Marzucchi, Alberto ; Antonietti, Roberto.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2013.76.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. The Effect of Within-Sector, Upstream and Downstream Energy Taxes on Innovation and Productivity. (2013). Marin, Giovanni ; Franco, Chiara .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2013.103.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Green growth, technology and innovation. (2012). Dutz, Mark A. ; Sharma, Siddharth.
    In: Policy Research Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:5932.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Regulation and Firm Perception, Eco-Innovation and Firm Performance. (2012). Doran, Justin ; Ryan, Geraldine .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:44578.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Environmental regulations and innovation activity in UK manufacturing industries. (2012). Manderson, Edward ; Kneller, Richard.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:34:y:2012:i:2:p:211-235.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?. (2011). Cohen, Mark ; Ambec, Stefan ; Elgie, Stewart ; Lanoie, Paul.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-11-01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Environmental policy and profitability: evidence from Swedish industry. (2010). Lundgren, Tommy ; Brannlund, Runar.
    In: Environmental Economics and Policy Studies.
    RePEc:spr:envpol:v:12:y:2010:i:1:p:59-78.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Does the Porter Hypothesis Explain Expected Future Financial Performance? The Effect of Clean Water Regulation on Chemical Manufacturing Firms. (2010). Earnhart, Dietrich.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:45:y:2010:i:3:p:353-377.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. A literature review on the links between environmental regulation and competitiveness. (2009). Oikonomou, Vlasis ; Frey, Marco ; Spijker, Eise ; Melis, Michela ; Testa, Francesco ; Iraldo, Fabio.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:sse:wpaper:200904.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Performance environnementale et économique de l’entreprise. (2009). Ambec, Stefan ; Lanoie, Paul.
    In: Économie et Prévision.
    RePEc:prs:ecoprv:ecop_0249-4744_2009_num_190_4_7996.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Environmental regulation and productivity: testing the porter hypothesis. (2008). Lajeunesse, Richard ; Lanoie, Paul ; Patry, Michel.
    In: Journal of Productivity Analysis.
    RePEc:kap:jproda:v:30:y:2008:i:2:p:121-128.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Environmental policy and profitability - Evidence from Swedish industry. (2008). Lundgren, Tommy ; Brannlund, Runar.
    In: Umeå Economic Studies.
    RePEc:hhs:umnees:0750.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Productivity and environmental regulations - A long run analysis of the Swedish industry. (2008). Brannlund, Runar.
    In: Umeå Economic Studies.
    RePEc:hhs:umnees:0728.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. The Environmental Porter Hypothesis: Theory, Evidence and a Model of Timing of Adoption. (2007). Ziesemer, Thomas ; Kriechel, Ben.
    In: MERIT Working Papers.
    RePEc:unm:unumer:2007024.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance : New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis. (2007). Laurent-Lucchetti, jérémy ; Johnstone, Nick ; Ambec, Stefan ; Lanoie, Paul.
    In: Cahiers de recherche.
    RePEc:iea:carech:0706.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Environmental policy, innovation and performance : new insights on the Porter hypothesis. (2007). Laurent-Lucchetti, jérémy ; Johnstone, Nick ; Ambec, Stefan ; Lanoie, P..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gbl:wpaper:200706.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. When and Why Does It Pay To Be Green?. (2007). Ambec, Stefan ; Lanoie, Paul.
    In: CIRANO Working Papers.
    RePEc:cir:cirwor:2007s-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Environmental Policy, Innovation and Performance: New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis. (2007). Laurent-Lucchetti, jérémy ; Johnstone, Nick ; Ambec, Stefan ; Lanoie, Paul.
    In: CIRANO Working Papers.
    RePEc:cir:cirwor:2007s-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Environmental Regulations and Technological Change in the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry. (2005). Managi, Shunsuke ; Jin, DI ; Grigalunas, Thomas A. ; Opaluch, SJames J..
    In: Land Economics.
    RePEc:uwp:landec:v:81:y:2005:i:2:p303-319.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Can Environmental Regulations be Good for Business? an Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis. (2005). Barla, Philippe ; Ambec, Stefan.
    In: Cahiers de recherche.
    RePEc:lvl:lagrcr:0505.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Can Environmental Regulations be Good for Business? an Assessment of the Porter Hypothesis. (2005). Barla, Philippe ; Ambec, Stefan.
    In: Cahiers de recherche.
    RePEc:lvl:laeccr:0505.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Reconsidering Environmental Policy: Prescriptive Consequentialism and Volitional Pragmatism. (2004). BROMLEY, DANIEL.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:28:y:2004:i:1:p:73-99.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-11-28 13:58:16 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.