Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Whose integration is this? European forest policy between the gospel of coordination, institutional competition, and a new spirit of integration. (2016). .
In: Environment and Planning C.
RePEc:sae:envirc:v:34:y:2016:i:3:p:496-514.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 6

Citations received by this document

Cites: 56

References cited by this document

Cocites: 24

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Did Forestland Restitution Facilitate Institutional Amnesia? Some Evidence from Romanian Forest Policy. (2019). Toza, Veronica ; Drgoi, Marian.
    In: Land.
    RePEc:gam:jlands:v:8:y:2019:i:6:p:99-:d:241103.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Forest owner behavioral models, policy changes, and forest management. An agent-based framework for studying the provision of forest ecosystem goods and services at the landscape level. (2019). Sallnas, Ola ; Sotirov, Metodi ; Eriksson, Ljusk Ola.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:103:y:2019:i:c:p:79-89.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Frontiers of the forest-based bioeconomy – A European Delphi study. (2019). Hetemaki, Lauri ; Lovri, Nataa ; Hurmekoski, Elias ; Winkel, Georg .
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:102:y:2019:i:c:p:86-99.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Contribution of spatially explicit models to climate change adaptation and mitigation plans for a priority forest habitat. (2018). Palmeirim, Jorge M ; Bugalho, Miguel N ; Correia, Ricardo A.
    In: Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.
    RePEc:spr:masfgc:v:23:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11027-017-9738-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Mitigating forest biodiversity and ecosystem service losses in the era of bio-based economy. (2018). Eyvindson, Kyle ; Monkkonen, Mikko ; Repo, Anna .
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:119-127.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The challenge of financing the implementation of Natura 2000 – Empirical evidence from six European Union Member States. (2017). Geitzenauer, Maria ; Winkel, Georg ; Weiss, Gerhard ; Sotirov, Metodi ; Ferranti, Francesca ; de Koning, Jessica ; Blondet, Marieke .
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:82:y:2017:i:c:p:3-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abram S, Cowell R, (2004) “Dilemmas of implementation: ‘integration’ and ‘participation’ in Norwegian and Scottish local government†. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 22: 701–719.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Andersson T, 2007 En gemensam europeisk skogspolitik? En integrationsteoretisk studieav ett politikområde på tillväxt PhD thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Umea, Sweden.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Bjärstig T, (2013) “The Swedish forest sector’s approach to a formalized forest policy within the EU†. Forest Policy and Economics 26: 131–137.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Bornemann B, 2007, “Sustainable development and policy integration: some conceptual clarifications†, paper for the Marie Curie Summer School on Earth System Governance, 28 May–6 June 2007, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, http://www.2007amsterdamconference.org/Downloads/07SummerSchool%20-%20Bornemann.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Briassoulis H, (2005) Policy Integration for Complex Environmental Problems: The Example of Mediterranean Desertification, Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Briassoulis H, 2004, “Policy integration for complex policy problems: what, why and how†, paper presented at the Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change—‘Greening of Policies: Interlinkages and Policy Integration’, Berlin, Germany, 3–4 December, http://www.geocities.ws/policy_making/en/publicpolicy/environmental_policy.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Carpenter S L, Kennedy W J D, (1988) Managing Public Disputes: A Practical Guide to Handling Conflict and Reaching Agreements, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Chilla T, (2007) “The political relevance of discourses on space†. Erdkunde 61: 13–25.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Council of the European Union (1998) “Resolution 1999/C56/01 of the European Council of 15 December 1998 on a forestry strategy for the European Union†. Official Journal of the Europan Communities C 56/1. Council of the European Union, Brussels.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. Degeling P, (1995) “The significance of ‘sectors’ in calls for urban public health intersectoralism: an Australian perspective†. Policy and Politics 23: 289–301.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Derkzen P, Bock B B, Wiskerke J S C, (2009) “Integrated rural policy in context: a case study on the meaning of ‘integration’ and the politics of ‘sectoring’ †. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 11: 143–163.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  12. Dimitrov R S, (2005) “Hostage to norms: states, institutions, and global forest politics†. Global Environmental Politics 5(4): 1–24.

  13. Edwards P, Kleinschmit D, (2013) “Towards a European forest policy: conflicting courses†. Forest Policy and Economics 33: 87–93.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. European Commission (2006) Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on an EU Forest Action Plan, Brussels: European Commission15 June, Cmnd 302 final.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. European Commission (2010) Green Paper on Forest Protection and Information in the EU: Preparing Forests for Climate Change, Brussels: European Commission1 March, Cmnd 66 final.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Feindt P H, (2010) “Policy-learning and environmental policy integration in the common agricultural policy, 1973–2003†. Public Administration 88: 296–314.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Fischer F, Forester J, (1993) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Fischer F, Gottweis H, (2012) The Argumentative Turn Revisited, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Forest Europe, 2012, “Draft negotiating text for a legally binding agreement on forests in Europe†, Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee for a Legally Binding Agreement on Forests in Europe, Bonn, September, http://foris.fao.org/static/forestnegotiations/Annex_D_EN.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. Giessen L, (2012) “Temporary governance and persistent government: rural policy integration in pilot and mainstream funding programs†. In: Hogl K, Kvarda E, Nordbeck R, Pregernig M, (eds) Environmental Governance: The Challenge of Legitimacy and Effectiveness, Cheltenham, Glos: Edward Elgar, pp. 155–177.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Giessen L, (2013) “Reviewing the main characteristics of the international forest regime complex and partial explanations for its fragmentation†. International Forestry Review 15: 1–11.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Glück P, (1994) “Entstehung eines internationalen Waldregimes†. Centralblatt für das gesamte Forstwesen 111: 75–92.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Gottweis H, (2003) “Post-positivistische Zugänge in der Policy-Analyse†. In: Maier M L, (eds) Politik als Lernprozeß, Opladen: Leske Budrich, pp. 122–138.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Healey P, (1998) “Reflections on integration†. In: Pike A, Sobers D, (eds) New Lifestyles, New Regions: Integrated Approaches to Local and Regional Development and Planning Policy, London: Regional Studies Association, pp. 109–112.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Howlett M, Rayner J, (2007) “Design principles for policy mixes: cohesion and coherence in ‘new governance arrangements’ †. Policy and Society 26(4): 1–18.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Howlett M, Rayner J, Goehler D, Heidbreder E, Perron-Welch F, Rukund O, Verkooijen P, Wildburger C, (2011) “Overcoming the challenges to integration: embracing complexity in forest policy design through multi-level governance“. In: Rayner J, Buck A, Katila P, (eds) Embracing Complexity: Meeting the Challenges of International Forest Governance. A Global Assessment Report Prepared by the Global Forest Expert Panel on the International Forest Regime, Vienna: UFRO World Series Volume 28, pp. 93–110.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Humphreys D, (2009) “Discourse as ideology: neoliberalism and the limits of international forest policy†. Forest Policies and Economics 11: 319–325.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Jordan A, Lenschow A, (2010) “Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review†. Environmental Policy and Governance 20: 147–158.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Kankaanpää S, Carter T K, 2004, “An overview of forest policies affecting land use in Europe†, The Finnish Environment 706, Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, http://www.ymparisto.fi/download.asp?contentid=25582&lan=en.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  30. Kern F, Howlett M, (2009) “Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector†. Policy Sciences 42: 391–408.

  31. Lafferty W M, Hovden E, (2003) “Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework“. Environmental Politics 12(3): 1–22.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Lazdinis M, Angelstam P, Lazdinis I, (2009) “Governing forests of the European Union: Institutional framework for interest representation at the European Community level†. Environmental Policy and Governance 19: 44–56.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Lenschow A, (2002) Environmental Policy Integration: Greening Sectoral Policies in Europe, London: Earthscan.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Lundqvist L, (2004) “Governing in common—integration and effectiveness in ecological governance†. In: Lundqvist L, (eds) Sweden and Ecological Governance: Straddling the Fence, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 117–147.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Meijers E, Stead D, 2004 “Policy integration: what does it mean and how can it be achieved? A multi-disciplinary review†, paper presented at the 2004 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change: Greening of Policies—Interlinkages and Policy Integration, http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/ffu/akumwelt/bc2004/download/meijers_stead_f.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Nilsson M, (2004) “Learning, frames, and environmental policy integration: the case of Swedish energy policy†. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 23: 207–226.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Nilsson M, Eklund M, Tyskeng S, (2009) “Environmental integration and policy implementation: competing governance modes in waste management decision making†. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27: 1–18.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Pelli P, Aggestam F, Weiss G, Inhaizer H, Heikkinen J, Keenleyside C, Gantioler S, Boglio D, Poláková J, 2012, “Ex-post evaluation of the EU Forest Action Plan†, European Forestry Institute, Joensuu, http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/evaluation/market-and-income-reports/2012/forest-action-plan/ fulltext_en.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Rametsteiner E, Nilsson S, Böttcher H, Havlik P, Kraxner F, Leduc S, Obersteiner M, Rydzak F, Schneider U, Schwab D, Willmore L, 2008, “Study of the effects of globalization on the economic viability of EU forestry†, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/analysis/external/viability_forestry/full_text.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Rauschmayer F, van den Hove S, Koetz T, (2009) “Participation in EU biodiversity governance: how far beyond rhetoric?†. Environmental Planning 27: 42–58.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Roe E, (1994) Narrative Policy Analysis: Theory and Practice, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Russel D, Turnpenny J, (2009) “The politics of sustainable development in UK government: what role for integrated policy appraisal?†. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27: 340–354.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Sabatier P A, (1988) “An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein†. Policy Sciences 21: 129–168.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Sabatier P, Hunter S, McLaughlin S, (1987) “The devil shift: perceptions and misperceptions of opponents†. The Western Political Quarterly 40: 449–476.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith H, (1999) “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: an assessment†. In: Sabatier P, (eds) Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 117–166.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Sabatier P, Weible C, (2007) “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: innovations and clarifications†. In: Sabatier P, (eds) Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 189–220.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. Sotirov M, Borrass L, Winkel G, (2011) “Dem Wandel auf der Spur. Theoretische Ansaetze zur Analyse von Politikwandel und -stabilitaet mit Fokus auf das Beispiel waldbezogener EU-Naturschutzpolitik†. AFJZ—German Journal of Forest Research 182: 215–230.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  48. Underdal A, (1980) “Integrated marine policy: What? Why? How?†. Marine Policy 4: 159–169.

  49. Vogelpohl T, Aggestam F, (2012) “Public policies as institutions for sustainability: potentials of the concept and findings from assessing sustainability in the European forest-based sector†. European Journal of Forest Research 131: 57–71.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Volz K-R, (2002) “Die drei Dimensionen der forstlichen Nachhaltigkeit—Oder: wie nachhaltig ist die Forstwirtschaft wirklich?†. Schriftenreihe des Deutschen Rates für Landespflege 74: 62–64.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Watson M, Bulkeley H, Hudson R, (2008) “Unpicking environmental policy integration with tales from waste management†. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26: 481–498.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Weber M, Driessen P P J, (2010) “Environmental policy integration: the role of policy windows in the integration of noise and spatial planning†. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 28: 1120–1134.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  53. Weber N, Christophersen T, (2002) “The influence of non-governmental organisations on the creation of Natura 2000 during the European Policy process†. Forest Policy and Economics 4: 1–12.

  54. Winkel G, Aggestam F, Sotirov M, Weiss G, (2013) “Forest Policy in the European Union†. In: Pülzl H, Arts B, Buttoud G, Dominguez G, Winkel G, Wolfslehner B, (eds) European Forest Governance: Issues at Stake and the Way Forward, Joensuu: European Forestry Institute, pp. 52–63. European Forest Institute Series, 2: What Science Can Tell Us.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Winkel G, Gleissner J, Pistorius T, Sotirov M, Storch S, (2011) “The sustainably managed forest heats up: discursive struggles over forest management and climate change in Germany†. Critical Policy Studies 5: 361–390.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Winkel G, Kaphengst T, Herbert S, Robaey Z, Rosenkranz L, Sotirov M, 2009, “EU policy options for the protection of European forests against harmful impacts†, final report, http://ec.europa.eu/environment/forests/pdf/ifp_ecologic_report.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. ‘Greenlash’ and reactionary stakeholders in environmental governance: An analysis of soy farmers against zero deforestation in Brazil. (2024). de Andrade, Rafaela Barbosa ; Bastos, Mairon G ; Ross, Helen ; Burns, Georgette Leah ; Biggs, Duan.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:166:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124001217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The performance of global forest governance: Three contrasting perspectives. (2024). McDermott, Constance L ; Giessen, Lukas ; Brockhaus, Maria ; Arts, Bas.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:161:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124000182.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The coalitional politics of the European Union Regulation on deforestation-free products. (2024). Sotirov, Metodi ; Berning, Laila.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:158:y:2024:i:c:s1389934123001971.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. FSC sustainability certification as green-lane for legality verification under the EUTR? Changes and policy learning at the interplay of private governance and public policy. (2021). Sotirov, Metodi ; Dieguez, Laura.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:131:y:2021:i:c:s138993412100174x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. International Forest Governance and Policy: Institutional Architecture and Pathways of Influence in Global Sustainability. (2020). Kleinschmit, Daniela ; Pokorny, Benno ; Sotirov, Metodi ; Kanowski, Peter.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7010-:d:405252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Can finance and market driven (FMD) interventions make “weak states” stronger? Lessons from the good governance norm complex in Cambodia. (2020). Nathan, Iben ; Cashore, Benjamin.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:177:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919303684.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Households’ attitude about ecosystem conservation after implementation of the Forest Rights Act, 2006, in Lakhari Valley Wildlife Sanctuary, India. (2019). Mishra, Brajaraja.
    In: Journal of Social and Economic Development.
    RePEc:spr:jsecdv:v:21:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s40847-019-00077-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Governing borderless climate risks: moving beyond the territorial framing of adaptation. (2019). Persson, SA ; Benzie, Magnus.
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
    RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:19:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10784-019-09441-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Mapping the fragmentation of the international forest regime complex: institutional elements, conflicts and synergies. (2019). Giessen, Lukas ; Burns, Sarah L ; Fernandez-Blanco, Carmen Rodriguez.
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
    RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:19:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10784-019-09434-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The rational design of regional regimes: contrasting Amazonian, Central African and Pan-European Forest Governance. (2018). Giessen, Lukas ; Sindt, Jan ; Bezerra, Joana Carlos.
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
    RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:18:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s10784-018-9395-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Regional governance by the South Asia Cooperative Environment Program (SACEP)? Institutional design and customizable regime policy offering flexible political options. (2018). Rahman, Md Saifur ; Sarker, Pradip Kumar ; Giessen, Lukas.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:77:y:2018:i:c:p:454-470.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. A political economy of the European Unions timber regulation: Which member states would, should or could support and implement EU rules on the import of illegal wood?. (2018). McDermott, Constance L ; Sotirov, Metodi.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:90:y:2018:i:c:p:180-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. “We are just cheerleaders”: Youths views on their participation in international forest-related decision-making fora. (2018). , Sekar ; Maryudi, Ahmad ; Soraya, Emma.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:88:y:2018:i:c:p:52-58.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Towards a donut regime? Domestic actors, climatization, and the hollowing-out of the international forests regime in the Anthropocene. (2017). Singer, Benjamin ; Giessen, Lukas.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:79:y:2017:i:c:p:69-79.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Alternative pathways to sustainability? Comparing forest governance models. (2017). Lindahl, Karin Beland ; Stens, Anna ; Sandstrom, Camilla.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:77:y:2017:i:c:p:69-78.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Whose integration is this? European forest policy between the gospel of coordination, institutional competition, and a new spirit of integration. (2016). .
    In: Environment and Planning C.
    RePEc:sae:envirc:v:34:y:2016:i:3:p:496-514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. A comparative analysis of the effects of institutional property rights on forest livelihoods and forest conditions: Evidence from Ghana and Vietnam. (2014). Nguyen, Trung Thanh ; Lambini, Cosmas Kombat.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:38:y:2014:i:c:p:178-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The promise of new institutionalism: explaining the absence of a World or United Nations Environment Organisation. (2013). Vijge, Marjanneke .
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
    RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:13:y:2013:i:2:p:153-176.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The discursive structure of FLEGT (Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade): The negotiation and interpretation of legality in the EU and Indonesia. (2013). Turnhout, Esther ; van Heeswijk, Laura .
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:32:y:2013:i:c:p:6-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. A community in the Orange: the development of a multi-level water governance framework in the Orange-Senqu River basin in Southern Africa. (2012). Jacobs, Inga .
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
    RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:12:y:2012:i:2:p:187-210.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Changing forestry discourses in Vietnam in the past 20years. (2012). Arts, Bas ; Turnhout, Esther ; Dang, Thi Kim Phung, .
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:25:y:2012:i:c:p:31-41.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Transparency for governance: The mechanisms and effectiveness of disclosure-based and education-based transparency policies. (2011). Mitchell, Ronald B..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:70:y:2011:i:11:p:1882-1890.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Challenges in determining national effects of international policy processes: Forest protection in Norway as a case. (2010). Lindstad, Berit H. ; Solberg, Birger.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:12:y:2010:i:7:p:489-496.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-27 03:42:53 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.