Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Challenges in determining national effects of international policy processes: Forest protection in Norway as a case. (2010). Lindstad, Berit H. ; Solberg, Birger.
In: Forest Policy and Economics.
RePEc:eee:forpol:v:12:y:2010:i:7:p:489-496.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 5

Citations received by this document

Cites: 38

References cited by this document

Cocites: 24

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. A new model of development coalition building: USAID achieving legitimate access and dominant information in Bangladesh’s forest policy. (2018). Saifur, MD ; Giessen, Lukas ; Miah, Sohag.
    In: World Development.
    RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:105:y:2018:i:c:p:248-261.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Towards a donut regime? Domestic actors, climatization, and the hollowing-out of the international forests regime in the Anthropocene. (2017). Singer, Benjamin ; Giessen, Lukas.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:79:y:2017:i:c:p:69-79.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Customizing elements of the International Forest Regime Complex in Poland? Non-implementation of a National Forest Programme and redefined transposition of NATURA 2000 in Bialowieza Forest. (2017). Logmani, Jacqueline ; Giessen, Lukas ; Lecyk, Michal Tymoteusz ; Krott, Max.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:74:y:2017:i:c:p:81-90.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Foreign donors driving policy change in recipient countries: Three decades of development aid towards community-based forest policy in Bangladesh. (2016). Nazmus, MD ; Saifur, MD ; Giessen, Lukas.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:68:y:2016:i:c:p:39-53.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Increasing representation of states by utilitarian as compared to environmental bureaucracies in international forest and forest–environmental policy negotiations. (2014). Giessen, Lukas ; Mollmann, Torsten ; Krott, Max.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:38:y:2014:i:c:p:97-104.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Cameron, J. ; Werksman, J. ; Roderick, P. Improving Compliance with International Environmental Law. 1996 Earthscan Publications Ltd: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Cashore, B. ; Auld, G. ; Newsom, D. Governing Through Markets. Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-State Authority. 2004 Yale University Press: New Haven & London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. CBD 2002. Convention on Biological Diversity. Decision VI/22: Forest Biological Diversity. [http://wwww.biodiv.org/decisions/default.aspx?dec=VI/22] 2002.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  4. Dimitrov, R. Hostage to norms: states, institutions and global forest politics. 2005 Global Environmental Politics. 5 1-24

  5. Dimitrov, R. Lost in the woods. International Forest Policy. 2004 En : Harrison, N.E. ; Bryner, G.C. Science and Politics in the International Environment. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Esty, D.C. ; Levy, M.A. ; Srebotnjak, T. ; de Sherbinin, A. ; Kim, C.H. ; Anderson, B. Pilot 2006 Environmental Performance Index. 2006 Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy: New Haven
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Framstad, E., Økland, B., Bendiksen, E., Bakkestuen, V., Blom, H. and Brandrud, T.E. 2002. Evaluering av skogvernet i Norge. [Assessment of forest protection in Norway] NINA Fagrapport 54. NINA Norsk institutt for naturforskning.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Gulbrandsen, L.H. Overlapping public and private governance: can forest certification fill the gaps in the global forest regime?. 2004 Global Environmental Politics. 4 74-99

  9. Gulbrandsen, L.H. The effectiveness of non-state governance schemes: a comparative study of forest certification in Norway and Sweden. 2005 International Environmental Agreements. 5 125-149

  10. Gulbrandsen, L.H. The evolving forest regime and domestic actors: strategic or normative adaptation?. 2003 Environmental Politics. 12 95-114
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Helm, C. ; Sprinz, D.F. Measuring the effectiveness of international environmental regimes. 2000 Journal of Conflict Resolution. 44 630-652

  12. Holmgren, L. Framing Global Public Policy on Forests: Sustainable Development and the Forest Issue on the UN Agenda 1972 to 2007. 2008 Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: Uppsala
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  13. Hovi, J. ; Sprinz, D.F. ; Underdal, A. The Oslo–Potsdam solution to measuring regime effectiveness: critique, response, and the road ahead. 2003 Global Environmental Politics. 3 74-96

  14. Humphreys, D. Forest Politics: The Evolution of International Cooperation. 1996 Earthscan Publications: London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Humphreys, D. Logjam: Deforestation and the Crisis of Global Governance. 2006 Earthscan. London: Sterling, VA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Kütting, G. Environment, Society and International Relations. 2000 Routledge: London and New York
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Kvakkestad, V. ; Svendsrud, A. ; Bekkby, T. ; Framstad, E. ; Solberg, B. ; Vatn, A. Virkemidlier for foraltning av biologisk mangfold. Del 2: Nordisk status for mål og virkemidler. 2004 TemaNord. 511 -
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Lindstad, B.H. ; Solberg, B. ; Trømborg, E. En analyse av norsk oppfølging av internasjonale beslutninger og anbefalinger knyttet til skogsektoren. 2004 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. MCPFE, Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe. 2003 En : Vienna resolution 4. :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  20. MCPFE, State of Europe's Forests 2003. 2003 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. MCPFE, State of Europe's Forests 2007. 2007 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. MCPFE, 2004. MCPFE General Information. [http://www.mcpfe.org/general_tab].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Miles, E.L. ; Underdal, A. ; Andresen, S. ; Wettestad, J. ; Skjærseth, J.B. ; Carlin, E.M. Environmental regime effectiveness. 2002 The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts: London, England
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Voluntary national reports on the implementation of the IPF/IFF proposals for action to the fifth session of the United Nations Forum on Forests. 2005 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. O'Neill, J. Ecology, Policy and Politics: Human Well-Being and the Natural World. 1989 Routledge: New York
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Pülzl, H. 2002. Evaluierung der Umsetzung der IPF- und IFF-Aktionsvorschläge in Östereich [Executive Summary in English: Evaluation of the Implementation of the IPF and IFF Proposals for Action in Austria.] (Schriftenreihe des Institutes für Sozioökonomik der Forst- und Holztwirtschaft. Band 45. Universität für Bodenkultur Wien).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Parviainen, J. ; Frank, G. Protected forests in Europe approaches harmonising the definitions for international comparison and policy-making. 2003 Journal of Environmental Management. 67 27-36
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  28. Ringquist, E.J. ; Kostadinova, T. Assessing the effectiveness of international environmental agreements: the case of the 1985 Helsinki Protocol. 2005 American Journal of Political Science. 49 86-102

  29. Solberg, B. Main socio-economic and ecological factors influencing the forest sector of Europe and implications for forest policies. 1998 En : Tikkanen, I. ; Pajari, B. Future Forest Policies in Europe—Balancing Economic and Ecological Demands. :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Underdal, A. Explaining compliance and defection: three models. 1998 European Journal of International Relations. 4 5-30
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Underdal, A. One question, two answers. 2002 En : Miles, E.L. Environmental Regime Effectiveness. :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Underdal, A. Progress in the absence of substantive joint decisions? Notes on the dynamics of regime formation processes. 1994 En : Hanisch, T. Climate Change and the Agenda for Research. Westview Press: Boulder, San Fransisco, Oxford
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. United Nations, 2000. Report of the Intergovernmental Forum on Forests on its fourth session, New York, 31 January11 February 2000 ‘United Nations Economic and Social Council. Document E/CN.17/2000/14 (20 March 2000)’.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. United Nations, 2001. United Nations Forum on Forests. Report on the organizational and first sessions (12 and 16 February and 11–22 June 2001), (E/2001/42/Rev.1 and E/CN.18/2001/3/Rev.1, United Nations Economic and Social Council). [Online: http://daccessdds.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N01/539/81/PDF/N0153981.pdf?OpenElement].
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Victor, D.G. ; Raustiala, K. ; Skolnikoff, E.B. The Implementation and Effectiveness of International Environmental Commitments: Theory and Practice. 1998 :
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. Young, O.R. Inferences and indices: evaluating the effectiveness of international environmental regimes. 2001 Global Environmental Politics. 1 99-121

  37. Young, O.R. International Cooperation. 1989 Cornell University Press: Ithaca and London
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Young, O.R. The consequences of international regimes. 2004 En : Underdal, A. ; Young, O.R. A Framework for Analysis. Regime Consequences:
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. ‘Greenlash’ and reactionary stakeholders in environmental governance: An analysis of soy farmers against zero deforestation in Brazil. (2024). de Andrade, Rafaela Barbosa ; Bastos, Mairon G ; Ross, Helen ; Burns, Georgette Leah ; Biggs, Duan.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:166:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124001217.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The performance of global forest governance: Three contrasting perspectives. (2024). McDermott, Constance L ; Giessen, Lukas ; Brockhaus, Maria ; Arts, Bas.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:161:y:2024:i:c:s1389934124000182.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. The coalitional politics of the European Union Regulation on deforestation-free products. (2024). Sotirov, Metodi ; Berning, Laila.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:158:y:2024:i:c:s1389934123001971.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. FSC sustainability certification as green-lane for legality verification under the EUTR? Changes and policy learning at the interplay of private governance and public policy. (2021). Sotirov, Metodi ; Dieguez, Laura.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:131:y:2021:i:c:s138993412100174x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. International Forest Governance and Policy: Institutional Architecture and Pathways of Influence in Global Sustainability. (2020). Kleinschmit, Daniela ; Pokorny, Benno ; Sotirov, Metodi ; Kanowski, Peter.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:17:p:7010-:d:405252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Can finance and market driven (FMD) interventions make “weak states” stronger? Lessons from the good governance norm complex in Cambodia. (2020). Nathan, Iben ; Cashore, Benjamin.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:177:y:2020:i:c:s0921800919303684.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Households’ attitude about ecosystem conservation after implementation of the Forest Rights Act, 2006, in Lakhari Valley Wildlife Sanctuary, India. (2019). Mishra, Brajaraja.
    In: Journal of Social and Economic Development.
    RePEc:spr:jsecdv:v:21:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s40847-019-00077-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Governing borderless climate risks: moving beyond the territorial framing of adaptation. (2019). Persson, SA ; Benzie, Magnus.
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
    RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:19:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10784-019-09441-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Mapping the fragmentation of the international forest regime complex: institutional elements, conflicts and synergies. (2019). Giessen, Lukas ; Burns, Sarah L ; Fernandez-Blanco, Carmen Rodriguez.
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
    RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:19:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s10784-019-09434-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. The rational design of regional regimes: contrasting Amazonian, Central African and Pan-European Forest Governance. (2018). Giessen, Lukas ; Sindt, Jan ; Bezerra, Joana Carlos.
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
    RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:18:y:2018:i:5:d:10.1007_s10784-018-9395-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Regional governance by the South Asia Cooperative Environment Program (SACEP)? Institutional design and customizable regime policy offering flexible political options. (2018). Rahman, Md Saifur ; Sarker, Pradip Kumar ; Giessen, Lukas.
    In: Land Use Policy.
    RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:77:y:2018:i:c:p:454-470.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. A political economy of the European Unions timber regulation: Which member states would, should or could support and implement EU rules on the import of illegal wood?. (2018). McDermott, Constance L ; Sotirov, Metodi.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:90:y:2018:i:c:p:180-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. “We are just cheerleaders”: Youths views on their participation in international forest-related decision-making fora. (2018). , Sekar ; Maryudi, Ahmad ; Soraya, Emma.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:88:y:2018:i:c:p:52-58.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Towards a donut regime? Domestic actors, climatization, and the hollowing-out of the international forests regime in the Anthropocene. (2017). Singer, Benjamin ; Giessen, Lukas.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:79:y:2017:i:c:p:69-79.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Alternative pathways to sustainability? Comparing forest governance models. (2017). Lindahl, Karin Beland ; Stens, Anna ; Sandstrom, Camilla.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:77:y:2017:i:c:p:69-78.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Whose integration is this? European forest policy between the gospel of coordination, institutional competition, and a new spirit of integration. (2016). .
    In: Environment and Planning C.
    RePEc:sae:envirc:v:34:y:2016:i:3:p:496-514.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. A comparative analysis of the effects of institutional property rights on forest livelihoods and forest conditions: Evidence from Ghana and Vietnam. (2014). Nguyen, Trung Thanh ; Lambini, Cosmas Kombat.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:38:y:2014:i:c:p:178-190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. The promise of new institutionalism: explaining the absence of a World or United Nations Environment Organisation. (2013). Vijge, Marjanneke .
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
    RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:13:y:2013:i:2:p:153-176.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The discursive structure of FLEGT (Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade): The negotiation and interpretation of legality in the EU and Indonesia. (2013). Turnhout, Esther ; van Heeswijk, Laura .
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:32:y:2013:i:c:p:6-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. A community in the Orange: the development of a multi-level water governance framework in the Orange-Senqu River basin in Southern Africa. (2012). Jacobs, Inga .
    In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.
    RePEc:spr:ieaple:v:12:y:2012:i:2:p:187-210.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Changing forestry discourses in Vietnam in the past 20years. (2012). Arts, Bas ; Turnhout, Esther ; Dang, Thi Kim Phung, .
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:25:y:2012:i:c:p:31-41.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Transparency for governance: The mechanisms and effectiveness of disclosure-based and education-based transparency policies. (2011). Mitchell, Ronald B..
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:70:y:2011:i:11:p:1882-1890.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Challenges in determining national effects of international policy processes: Forest protection in Norway as a case. (2010). Lindstad, Berit H. ; Solberg, Birger.
    In: Forest Policy and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:forpol:v:12:y:2010:i:7:p:489-496.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-26 04:20:06 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.