Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Estimation of Households’ and Businesses’ Willingness to Pay for Improved Reliability of Electricity Supply in Nepal. (2018). Jenkins, Glenn ; Niroomand, Naghmeh.
In: Development Discussion Papers.
RePEc:qed:dpaper:404.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 51

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aadland, D., Caplan, A.J., 2006. Cheap talk reconsidered: new evidence from CVM. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 60, 562–578.

  2. Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., Williams, M., Louviere, J., 1998. Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values: choice experiments and contingent valuation. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 80, 65–75. Nepal Electricity Authority, 2015. Technical report, Nepal Electricity Authority.

  3. Atkinson, G., Day, B., Mourato, S., Palmer, C., 2004. ‘Amenity’ or ‘Eyesore’? Negative willingness to pay for options to replace electricity transmission towers. Appl. Econ. Lett. 11 (4), 203–208.

  4. Billinton, R., Pandey, M., 1999. Reliability worth assessment in a developing country – residential survey results. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 14 (4), 1226–1231.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  5. Bishop, R.C., and Heberlein, T.A. (1979), “Measuring Values of Extra-market Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased?” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61, 5, 926-930.

  6. Bose, R.K., Shukla, M., 2001. Electricity tariffs in India: an assessment of consumers' ability and willingness to pay in Gujarat. Energy Policy 29 (6), 465–478.

  7. Boxall, P., Adamowicz, W., Williams, M., Swait, J., Louviere, J., 1996. A comparison of stated preference approaches to the measurement of environmental values. Ecol. Econ. 18, 243–253.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  8. Brown, T.C., Ajzen, I., Hrubes, D., 2003. Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46, 353–361.

  9. Bulte, E., Gerking, S., List, J.A., de Zeeuw, A., 2005. The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated values: evidence from a field study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 49, 330–342.

  10. Carlsson, F., Martinsson, P., 2006. Do experience and cheap talk influence willingness to pay in an open-ended contingent valuation survey? Working Papers in Economics, No. 190, School of Business Economics and Law, Göteborg University. Available at: https://gupea.ub.gu.se/handle/2077/2732.

  11. Carlsson, F., Martinsson, P., 2007. Willingness to pay among Swedish households to avoid power outages – a random parameter Tobit model approach. Energy J. 28 (1), 75–90.

  12. Carlsson, F., Martinsson, P., 2008. Does it matter when a power outage occurs? – a choice experiment study on the willingness to pay to avoid power outages. Energy Econ. 30 (3), 1232–1245.

  13. Carlsson, F., Martinsson, P., Akay, A., 2011. The effect of power outages and cheap talk on willingness to pay to reduce outages. Energy Econ. 33 (5) 790–798 Carson R.T., Hanemann W.M., 2005. Contingent valuation. In: Maler KG, Vincent TR, editors. Handbook of environmental economics, vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V., 822–873.

  14. CBS, 2011. Nepal Living Standard Survey: 2010/11, Statistical Report, vol. I. CBS, Kathmandu.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. CBS, 2012. National Population and Housing Census: National Report. CBS, Kathmandu.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. CBS, 2015. Statistical Yearbook of Nepal. CBS, Kathmandu.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Chowdhury, A.A., Mielnik, T.C., Lawion, L.E., Sullivan, M.J., Katz, A., 2004. Reliability worth assessment in electric power delivery systems. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Gen. Meet. 1, 654–660.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. CIE, 2001. Review of Willingness-to-pay Methodologies. Centre for International Economics, Canberra and Sydney.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Cohen J.J., Moeltner K., Reichl J., Schmidthaler M., 2016. Linking the value of energy reliability to the acceptance of energy infrastructure: Evidence from the EU. Resource and Energy Economics 45, 124143.

  20. Cummings, R.G., Taylor, L.O., 1999. Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: a cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. American Economic Review 89, 649–665.

  21. Flores, N.E. and Strong, A. (2007) Cost credibility and the stated preference analysis of public goods. Resource and Energy Economics 29, 195–205.

  22. Green, D., Jacowitz, K.E., Kahneman, D. and McFadden, D. (1998) Referendum contingent valuation, anchoring, and willingness to pay for public goods. Resource and Energy Economics 20(2): 85–116.

  23. Haab, T., and Mcconnell, K., 1997. Referendum models and negative willingness to pay: alternative solutions, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 32, 251 270.

  24. Haab, T., and Mcconnell, K., 1999. Simple bounds for willingness to pay using a probit or logit model, January. Working paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  25. Hanemann, W. M., 1984. Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(3), 332-341.

  26. Hanemann, W. M., 1989. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete response data: reply. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71(4), 1057-1061.

  27. Hashemi, M., Jenkins, G.P.,Jyoti, R., and Ozbafli, A., 2018. Evaluating the cost to industry of electricity outages, Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 13:7, 340-349.

  28. Hensher, D. A., Shore, N., Train, K., 2014. Willingness to pay for residential electricity supply quality and reliability. Appl Energy. 115, 280–292.

  29. Hensher, D.A., Rose, J., Greene, W.H., 2005a. The implications on willingness to pay of respondents ignoring specific attributes. Transportation 32 (3), 203–222.

  30. Hensher, D.A., Rose, J., Greene, W.H., 2005b. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. Hoyos, D., Mariel, P., 2010. Contingent valuation: past, present and future. Prague Econ Papers. 4, 329–343.

  32. Küfeoğlu, S., Lehtonen, M., 2015. Comparison of different models for estimating the residential sector customer interruption costs. Electric Power Systems Research. 122, 50–55.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Kateregga, K., 2009. The welfare costs of electricity outages: a contingent valuation analysis of households in the suburbs of Kampala, Jinja and Entebbe. J. Dev. Agric. Econ. 1 (1), 1–11.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. KPMG, 2003. Essential Services Commission of South Australia – Consumer Preferences for Electricity Service Standards, KPMG Assurance and Advisory.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Kriström, B., 1990. A non-parametric approach to the estimation of welfare measures in discrete response valuation studies. Land Economics, 66(2), 135-139.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. List, J., 2001. Do explicit warnings eliminate the hypothetical bias in elicitation procedures? Evidence from field auctions for sports cards. American Economic Review 91, 1498–1507.

  37. MCC, 2017. Nepal Compact, Millennium Challenge Corporation, Washington DC www.mcc.gov/where-we-work/program/nepal-compact (accessed May 30, 2018).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Mitchell, R., Carson, R., 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods. The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. NEA, 2014. Annual Report, NEA, Kathmandu.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. NEA, 2017. Annual Report, NEA, Kathmandu.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  41. Ozbaflı, A., Jenkins, G. P., 2015. The willingness to pay by households for improved reliability of electricity service in North Cyprus. Energy Policy. 87, 359–369.

  42. Rehn, E., 2003. Willingness to Pay or Extra Services and Consumer Behaviour in the Swedish Electricity Market – A Contingent Valuation (Master's thesis). Lund University, Sweden.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  43. Sanghvi, A.P., 1983. Optimal electricity supply reliability using customer shortage costs. Energy Econ. 5 (2), 129–136.

  44. Schläpfer, F., Schmitt, M., 2007. Anchors, endorsements, and preferences: A field experiment. Resource and Energy Economics. 29(3), 229-243.

  45. Tollefson, G., Billinton, R., Wacker, G., Chan, E., Aweya, J., 1994. A Canadian customer survey to assess power system reliability worth. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 9 (1), 443–450.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Turnbull, B.W., 1976. The empirical distribution function with arbitrarily grouped, censored and truncated data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, B38(3), 290-295.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  47. WECS, 2010. Energy Synopsis Report: 2010. WECS, Kathmandu.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Wiser, R., 2003. Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: A comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. World Bank, 2011. Electric power consumption (kWh per capita). Available at http:// data. World Bank .org/ indicator /EG.USE.ELEC.KH.PC.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. World Bank, 2015. Cross-Border Electricity Cooperation in South Asia, Policy Research Working Paper 7328.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  51. Zachariadis, T., Poullikkas, A., 2012. The costs of power outages: a case study of Cyprus. Energy Policy 51, 630–641.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Estimation of Households’ and Businesses’ Willingness to Pay for Improved Reliability of Electricity Supply in Nepal. (2018). Jenkins, Glenn ; Niroomand, Naghmeh.
    In: Development Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:qed:dpaper:404.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Eco-labeling in the Fresh Produce Market: Not All Environmentally Friendly Labels Are Equally Valued. (2018). Gao, Zhifeng ; Zhao, Xin ; House, Lisa ; Swisher, Marilyn ; Chen, Xuqi.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:154:y:2018:i:c:p:201-210.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Mekong River Delta farm-household willingness to pay for salinity intrusion risk reduction. (2018). Khong, Tien Dung ; Thennakoon, Jayanthi ; Loch, Adam ; Young, Michael D.
    In: Agricultural Water Management.
    RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:200:y:2018:i:c:p:80-89.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Factors affecting farmers’ WTP for innovative fertilizer against soil salinity. (2018). Klonaris, Stathis ; Tsigou, Stavroula.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:aua:wpaper:2018-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Mitigating Hypothetical Bias: An Application to WTP for Beach Conditions Information. (2018). Petrolia, Daniel ; Quainoo, Ruth.
    In: 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:saea18:266715.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Cheap Talk, Consequentiality, and Certainty Follow-up as Hypothetical Bias Mitigation Techniques: A Cross Country Comparison. (2018). Hu, Wuyang ; Ye, Tao ; Penn, Jerrod.
    In: 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea18:274018.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Consumers willingness to offset their CO2 emissions from traveling: A discrete choice analysis of framing and provider contributions. (2017). Schleich, Joachim ; Ziegler, Andreas ; Dutschke, Elisabeth ; Schwirplies, Claudia.
    In: Working Papers Sustainability and Innovation.
    RePEc:zbw:fisisi:s052017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Effects of payment vehicle non-attendance in choice experiments on value estimates and the WTA–WTP disparity. (2017). Koetse, Mark J.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy.
    RePEc:taf:teepxx:v:6:y:2017:i:3:p:225-245.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The Influence of Collective Action on the Demand for Voluntary Climate Change Mitigation in Hypothetical and Real Situations. (2017). Sturm, Bodo ; Uehleke, Reinhard.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:67:y:2017:i:3:d:10.1007_s10640-016-0028-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Economic evaluation of environmental externalities in China’s coal-fired power generation. (2017). Ma, Chunbo ; Li, William ; Luo, Kaiyan ; Hu, Yanan ; Cai, Qiong ; Zhao, Xiaoli.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:102:y:2017:i:c:p:307-317.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. How Sensitive Are Environmental Valuations To Economic Downturns?. (2017). Loureiro, Maria ; Loomis, John.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:140:y:2017:i:c:p:235-240.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Product Line Extension in Consumer Software Markets in the Presence of Free Alternatives. (2016). Baird, Aaron ; Sinha, Rajiv K ; Raghu, T S ; Miller, Chadwick J.
    In: Information Systems Research.
    RePEc:inm:orisre:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:282-301.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Can you ever be certain? Reducing hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments via respondent reported choice certaintyAuthor-Name: Beck, Matthew J.. (2016). Rose, John M ; Fifer, Simon .
    In: Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.
    RePEc:eee:transb:v:89:y:2016:i:c:p:149-167.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Making the Most of Cheap Talk in an Online Survey. (2016). Hu, Wuyang ; Penn, Jerrod.
    In: 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts.
    RePEc:ags:aaea16:236171.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. A Contingent Valuation Approach to Estimating Regulatory Costs: Mexico’s Day Without Driving Program. (2015). Carlsson, Fredrik ; Blackman, Allen ; Alpizar Rodriguez, Francisco ; Planter, Marisol Rivera .
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:rff:dpaper:dp-15-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Hypothetical bias for private goods: does cheap talk make a difference?. (2015). Saulais, Laure ; Doyon, Maurice ; Bweli, Denise ; Ruffieux, Bernard.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-01254936.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Evaluating mitigation and calibration techniques for hypothetical bias in choice experiments. (2014). Broadbent, Craig D..
    In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management.
    RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:57:y:2014:i:12:p:1831-1848.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Augmenting short Cheap Talk scripts with a repeated Opt-Out Reminder in Choice Experiment surveys. (2014). Olsen, Søren ; Ladenburg, Jacob.
    In: Resource and Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:resene:v:37:y:2014:i:c:p:39-63.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Testing the single opt-out reminder in choice experiments: An application to fuel break management in Spain. (2014). Soliño, Mario ; Mahieu, Pierre-Alexandre ; Giergiczny, Marek ; Varela, Elsa ; Riera, Pere ; Solio, Mario.
    In: Journal of Forest Economics.
    RePEc:eee:foreco:v:20:y:2014:i:3:p:212-222.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Using Field Experiments in Environmental and Resource Economics. (2013). Price, Michael ; list, john.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19289.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Using Field Experiments in Environmental and Resource Economics. (2013). Price, Michael ; list, john.
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:00447.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Behavioral foundations of environmental economics and valuation. (2013). Murphy, James J. ; McConnell, Kenneth E. ; Horowitz, John K..
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:12964_4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Preference elicitation under oath. (2013). Shogren, Jason ; Jacquemet, Nicolas ; Luchini, Stephane ; Joule, Robert-Vincent .
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:65:y:2013:i:1:p:110-132.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Property rights regimes in complex fishery management systems: A choice experiment application. (2013). Quinn, Claire ; Kanchanaroek, Yingluk ; Termansen, Mette.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:93:y:2013:i:c:p:363-373.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. ‘When to Take “No” for an Answer’? Using Entreaties to Reduce Protests in Contingent Valuation Studies. (2012). Provins, Allan ; Mourato, Susana ; Atkinson, Giles ; Morse-Jones, Sian .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:51:y:2012:i:4:p:497-523.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Environmental pricing of externalities from different sources of electricity generation in Chile. (2012). Longo, Alberto ; Hutchinson, George W. ; Aravena, Claudia.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:34:y:2012:i:4:p:1214-1225.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Hypothetical Bias in Choice Experiments: Is Cheap Talk Effective at Eliminating Bias on the Intensive and Extensive Margins of Choice?. (2012). Taylor, Laura ; Ryan, Bosworth ; Taylor Laura O., .
    In: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy.
    RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:12:y:2012:i:1:p:1-28:n:56.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Behavioral Foundations of Environmental Economics and Valuation. (2012). Murphy, James ; Horowitz, John K. ; McConnell, Kenneth E..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ala:wpaper:2012-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Discrete Choice Modeling of Consumer Preferences for Sustainably Produced Steak and Apples. (2012). Tonsor, Glynn ; Shupp, Robert ; Sackett, Hillary M..
    In: 2012 AAEA/EAAE Food Environment Symposium.
    RePEc:ags:aaeafe:123517.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. A Test of Cheap Talk in Different Hypothetical Contexts: The Case of Air Pollution. (2011). CHANEL, Olivier ; AMI, Dominique ; Luchini, Stephane ; Aprahamian, Frederic.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:50:y:2011:i:1:p:111-130.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Social Psychology and Environmental Economics: A New Look at ex ante Corrections of Biased Preference Evaluation. (2011). Shogren, Jason ; James, Alexander ; Jacquemet, Nicolas.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:48:y:2011:i:3:p:413-433.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Social psychology and environmental economics: a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation. (2011). James, Alexander ; Luchini, Stephane ; Jacquemet, Nicolas ; Shogren, Jason.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00584247.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Do you not like Pigou, or do you not understand him? Tax aversion and revenue recycling in the lab. (2011). Kroll, Stephan ; Kallbekken, Steffen ; Cherry, Todd.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:62:y:2011:i:1:p:53-64.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. The effect of power outages and cheap talk on willingness to pay to reduce outages. (2011). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Akay, Alpaslan.
    In: Energy Economics.
    RePEc:eee:eneeco:v:33:y:2011:i:5:p:790-798.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. A Comparison of Induced Value and Home-Grown Value Experiments to Test for Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation. (2010). Murphy, James.
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:47:y:2010:i:1:p:111-123.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Social psychology and environmental economics : a new look at ex ante corrections of biased preference evaluation. (2010). Shogren, Jason ; Luchini, Stephane ; Jacquemet, Nicolas .
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00462193.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Gender anomalies in Stated Preference surveys – Are biases really gender dependent?. (2010). Olsen, Søren ; Ladenburg, Jacob.
    In: IFRO Working Paper.
    RePEc:foi:wpaper:2010_01.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Using Choice Experiments to Estimate Wetland Values in Viet Nam: Implementation and Practical Issues. (2010). Bennett, Jeff ; Do, Thang Nam .
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:13208_3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Concluding Remarks and Recommendations for Implementing Choice Experiments in Developing Countries. (2010). Birol, Ekin ; Bennett, Jeff.
    In: Chapters.
    RePEc:elg:eechap:13208_17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Choice Experiments in Developing Countries. (2010). Birol, Ekin ; Bennett, Jeffrey.
    In: Books.
    RePEc:elg:eebook:13208.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Economic valuation of a contemporary art museum: correction of hypothetical bias using a certainty question. (2009). Herrero, Luis César ; Sanz, Jose ; Bedate, Ana.
    In: Journal of Cultural Economics.
    RePEc:kap:jculte:v:33:y:2009:i:3:p:185-199.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Testing the Effectiveness of Certainty Scales, Cheap Talk, and Dissonance-Minimization in Reducing Hypothetical Bias in Contingent Valuation Studies. (2009). .
    In: Environmental & Resource Economics.
    RePEc:kap:enreec:v:44:y:2009:i:3:p:307-326.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. The Effect of Power Outages and Cheap Talk on Willingness to Pay to Reduce Outages. (2009). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik ; Akay, Alpaslan.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp4307.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. A Comparison of Approaches to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias. (2009). Champ, Patricia A. ; Bishop, Richard C. ; Moore, Rebecca.
    In: Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:arerjl:55867.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. A Bayesian examination of information and uncertainty in contingent valuation. (2007). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David ; Phillips, Owen .
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:35:y:2007:i:2:p:149-178.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. The effect of experience and quantity-based pricing on the valuation of a curbside recycling program. (2007). Grijalva, Therese ; Caplan, Arthur ; Bohara, Alok.
    In: Ecological Economics.
    RePEc:eee:ecolec:v:64:y:2007:i:2:p:433-443.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. On the Use of Cheap Talk in New Product Valuation. (2007). Brummett, Robert G. ; Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr., ; Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr., .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:2:y:2007:i:1:p:1-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. On the Use of Cheap Talk in New Product Valuation. (2007). Wu, Ximing ; Nayga, Rodolfo ; Brummett, Robert G. ; Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr., ; Rodolfo M. Nayga, Jr., .
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-07b40001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Do Experience and Cheap Talk influence Willingness to Pay in an Open-Ended Contingent Valuation Survey?. (2006). Martinsson, Peter ; Carlsson, Fredrik.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0190.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. A Bayesian Examination of Anchoring Bias and Cheap Talks in Constructed Markets. (2005). Caplan, Arthur ; Aadland, David.
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-25 22:31:06 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.