Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Cooperative games for minimum cost spanning tree problems. (2020). Vidal-Puga, Juan ; Bergantios, Gustavo.
In: MPRA Paper.
RePEc:pra:mprapa:104911.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 90

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Aarts, H. (1994). Minimum cost spanning tree games and set games. PhD thesis, University of Twente.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Aarts, H. and Driessen, T. (1993). The irreducible core of a minimum cost spanning tree game. Methods and Models of Operations Research, 38:163–174.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Ando, K. (2012). Computation of the Shapley value of minimum cost spanning tree games: #P-hardness and polynomial cases. Japan Journal of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 29(3):385–400.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Ando, K. and Kato, S. (2010). Reduction of ultrametric minimum cost spanning tree games to cost allocation games on rooted trees. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 53(1):62–68.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  5. Aumann, R. J. and Maschler, M. (1985). Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the Talmud. Journal of Economic Theory, 36:195–213.

  6. Bahel, E. and Trudeau, C. (2017). Minimum incoming cost rules for arborescences. Social Choice and Welfare, 49(2):287–314.

  7. Bergantiños, G. and Gómez-Rúa, M. (2010). Minimum cost spanning tree problems with groups. Economic Theory, 43(2):227–262.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Bergantiños, G. and Gómez-Rúa, M. (2015). An axiomatic approach in minimum cost spanning tree problems with groups. Annals of Operations Research, 225(1):45–63.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  9. Bergantiños, G. and Kar, A. (2010). On obligation rules for minimum cost spanning tree problems. Games and Economic Behavior, 69(2):224–237.

  10. Bergantiños, G. and Lorenzo-Freire, S. (2008). “Optimistic” weighted Shapley rules in minimum cost spanning tree problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 185(1):289–298.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Bergantiños, G. and Lorenzo-Freire, S. (2008). A characterization of optimistic weighted Shapley rules in minimum cost spanning tree problems. Economic Theory, 35(3):523–538.

  12. Bergantiños, G. and Lorenzo, L. (2004). A non-cooperative approach to the cost spanning tree problem. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 59(3):393–403.

  13. Bergantiños, G. and Lorenzo, L. (2005). Optimal equilibria in the non-cooperative game associated with cost spanning tree problems. Annals of Operations Research, 137(1):101–115.

  14. Bergantiños, G. and Lorenzo, L. (2008). Non cooperative cost spanning tree problems with budget restrictions. Naval Research Logistics, 55(8):747–757.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  15. Bergantiños, G. and Lorenzo, L. (2020). Cost additive rules in minimum cost spanning tree problems with multiple sources. Annals of Operations Research, forthcoming.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  16. Bergantiños, G. and Moreno-Ternero, J. D. (2015). The axiomatic approach to the problem of sharing the revenue from museum passes. Games and Economic Behavior, 89:78–92.

  17. Bergantiños, G. and Moreno-Ternero, J. D. (2020). Sharing the revenues from broadcasting sport events. Management Science, 66(6):2417–2431.

  18. Bergantiños, G. and Navarro-Ramos, A. (2019). A characterization of the folk rule for multi-source minimal cost spanning tree problems. Operations Research Letters, 47:366–370.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Bergantiños, G. and Navarro-Ramos, A. (2019). The folk rule through a painting procedure for minimum cost spanning tree problems with multiple sources. Mathematical Social Sciences, 99:43–48.

  20. Bergantiños, G. and Vidal-Puga, J. (2007). A fair rule in minimum cost spanning tree problems. Journal of Economic Theory, 137(1):326–352.

  21. Bergantiños, G. and Vidal-Puga, J. (2007). The optimistic TU game in minimum cost spanning tree problems. International Journal of Game Theory, 36(2):223–239.

  22. Bergantiños, G. and Vidal-Puga, J. (2009). Additivity in minimum cost spanning tree problems. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 45(1-2):38–42.

  23. Bergantiños, G. and Vidal-Puga, J. (2010). Realizing fair outcomes in minimum cost spanning tree problems through non-cooperative mechanisms. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(3):811–820.

  24. Bergantiños, G. and Vidal-Puga, J. (2011). The folk solution and Boruvka’s algorithm in minimum cost spanning tree problems. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 159(12):1279–1283.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  25. Bergantiños, G. and Vidal-Puga, J. (2015). Characterization of monotonic rules in minimum cost spanning tree problems. International Journal of Game Theory, 44(4):835–868.

  26. Bergantiños, G., Chun, Y., Lee, E., and Lorenzo, L. (2020). The folk rule for minimum cost spanning tree problems with multiple sources. Mimeo, Repec.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Bergantiños, G., Gómez-Rúa, M., Llorca, N., Pulido, M., and Sánchez-Soriano, J. (2012). A cost allocation rule for k-hop minimum cost spanning tree problems. Operations Research Letters, 40(1):52–55.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  28. Bergantiños, G., Gómez-Rúa, M., Llorca, N., Pulido, M., and Sánchez-Soriano, J. (2014). A new rule for source connection problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 234(3):780–788.

  29. Bergantiños, G., Lorenzo, L., and Lorenzo-Freire, S. (2010). The family of cost monotonic and cost additive rules in minimum cost spanning tree problems. Social Choice and Welfare, 34(4):695–710.

  30. Bergantiños, G., Lorenzo, L., and Lorenzo-Freire, S. (2011). A generalization of obligation rules for minimum cost spanning tree problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 211(1):122–129.

  31. Bird, C. (1976). On cost allocation for a spanning tree: a game theoretic approach. Networks, 6(4):335–350.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  32. Borm, P., Hamers, H., and Hendrickx, R. (2001). Operations research games: a survey. Top, 9(2):139–216.

  33. Borůvka, O. (1926). O jistém problému minimálnı́m (about a certain minimal problem). Práce moravské přı́rodovědecké společnosti v Brne, 3:37–58. In Czech.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  34. Branzei, R., Moretti, S., Norde, H., and Tijs, S. (2004). The P-value for cost sharing in minimum cost spanning tree situations. Theory and Decision, 56:47–61.

  35. Chun, Y. and Lee, J. (2012). Sequential contributions rules for minimum cost spanning tree problems. Mathematical Social Sciences, 64(2):136–143. Bargaining, Evolution and Networks: A Special Issue in Honor of Hans Haller.

  36. Ciftci, B. and Tijs, S. (2009). A vertex oriented approach to the equal remaining obligations rule for minimum cost spanning tree situations. Top, 17(2):440–453.

  37. Claus, A. and Kleitman, D. (1973). Cost allocation for a spanning tree. Networks, 3(4):289–304.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Curiel, I. (1997). Minimum cost spanning tree games. In Curiel, I., editor, Cooperative Game Theory and Applications: Cooperative Games Arising from Combinatorial Optimization Problems, volume 16 of Theory and Decision Library, chapter 6, pages 129–148. Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  39. Dutta, B. and Kar, A. (2004). Cost monotonicity, consistency and minimum cost spanning tree games. Games and Economic Behavior, 48(2):223–248.

  40. Dutta, B. and Mishra, D. (2012). Minimum cost arborescences. Games and Economic Behavior, 74(1):120–143.

  41. Estévez-Fernández, A. and Reijnierse, H. (2014). On the core of cost-revenue games: Minimum cost spanning tree games with revenues. European Journal of Operational Research, 237(2):606–616.

  42. Faigle, U., Kern, W., and Kuipers, J. (1998). Computing the nucleolus of min-cost spanning tree games is NP-hard. International Journal of Game Theory, 27(3):443–450.

  43. Feltkamp, V. (1995). Cooperation in controlled network structures. PhD thesis, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  44. Feltkamp, V., Tijs, S., and Muto, S. (1994). On the irreducible core and the equal remaining obligations rule of minimum cost spanning extension problems. Technical Report 106, CentER DP 1994, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.

  45. Feltkamp, V., Tijs, S., and Muto, S. (2000). Bird’s tree allocation revisited. In Patrone, Garcı́a-Jurado, and Tijs, editors, Game practice: Contributions from applied game theory, pages 75–89. Kluwer.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  46. Fernández, F. R., Hinojosa, M. A., and Puerto, J. (2004). Multi-criteria minimum cost spanning tree games. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(2):399–408. Methodological Foundations of Multi-Criteria Decision Making.

  47. Giménez-Gómez, J.-M., Peris, J. E., and Subiza, B. (2020). An egalitarian approach for sharing the cost of a spanning tree. PLoS ONE, 15(7):e0236058–.

  48. Ginsburgh, V. and Zang, I. (2003). The museum pass game and its value. Games and Economic Behavior, 43:322–325.

  49. Gómez-Rúa, M. and Vidal-Puga, J. (2011). Merge-proofness in minimum cost spanning tree problems. International Journal of Game Theory, 40(2):309–329.

  50. Gómez-Rúa, M. and Vidal-Puga, J. (2017). A monotonic and merge-proof rule in minimum cost spanning tree situations. Economic Theory, 63:813–826.

  51. Granot, D. and Huberman, G. (1981). Minimum cost spanning tree games. Mathematical Programming, 21(1):1–18.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Granot, D. and Huberman, G. (1984). On the core and nucleolus of minimum cost spanning tree problems. Mathematical Programming, 29(3):323–347.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  53. Hernández, P., Peris, J. E., and Vidal-Puga, J. (2020). A non-cooperative approach to the folk rule in minimum cost spanning tree problems. Mimeo, Universidade de Vigo.

  54. Kalai, E. and Samet, D. (1987). On weighted Shapley values. International Journal of Game Theory, 16(3):205–222.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  55. Kar, A. (2002). Axiomatization of the Shapley value on minimum cost spanning tree games. Games and Economic Behavior, 38(2):265–277.

  56. Kobayashi, M. and Okamoto, Y. (2014). Submodularity of minimum-cost spanning tree games. Networks, 63(3):231–238.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Kruskal, J. B. (1956). On the shortest spanning subtree of a graph and the travelling salesman problem. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 7:48–50.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  58. Kuipers, J. (1993). On the core of information graph games. International Journal of Game Theory, 21(4):339–350.

  59. Littlechild, S. and Owen, G. (1973). A simple expression for the Shapley value in a special case. Management Science, 20(3):370–372.

  60. Lorenzo, L. and Lorenzo-Freire, S. (2009). A characterization of Kruskal sharing rules for minimum cost spanning tree problems. International Journal of Game Theory, 38(1):107–126.

  61. Megiddo, N. (1978). Cost allocation for Steiner trees. Networks, 8(1):1–6.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Moretti, S., Gök, S. Z. A., Branzei, R., and Tijs, S. (2011). Connection situations under uncertainty and cost monotonic solutions. Computers and Operational Research, 38(11):1638–1645.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  63. Moretti, S., Norde, H., Pham Do, K. H., and Tijs, S. (2002). Connection problems in mountains and monotonic allocation schemes. Top, 10(1):83–99.

  64. Norde, H. (2019). The degree and cost adjusted folk solution for minimum cost spanning tree games. Games and Economic Behavior, 113:734–742.

  65. Norde, H., Moretti, S., and Tijs, S. (2004). Minimum cost spanning tree games and population monotonic allocation schemes. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(1):84–97.

  66. Núñez, M. and Vidal-Puga, J. (2020). Stable cores in information graph games. Working paper, Universidade de Vigo.

  67. O’Neill, B. (1982). A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud. Mathematical Social Sciences, 2(4):345–371.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  68. Owen, G. (1977). Values of games with a priori unions. In Henn, R. and Moeschlin, O., editors, Mathematical Economics and Game Theory, volume 141 of Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, pages 76–88. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  69. Prim, R. (1957). Shortest connection networks and some generalizations. Bell Systems Technology Journal, 36(6):1389–1401.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  70. Schmeidler, D. (1969). The nucleolus of a characteristic function game. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 17(6):1163–1170.

  71. Shapley, L. S. (1953). A value for n-person games. In Kuhn, H. and Tucker, A., editors, Contributions to the theory of games, volume II of Annals of Mathematics Studies, pages 307–317. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  72. Shapley, L. S. (1953). Additive and non-additive set functions. PhD thesis, Princeton University.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  73. Skorin-Kapov, D. (1995). On the core of the minimum cost Steiner tree game in networks. Annals of Operations Research, 57:233–249.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  74. Skorin-Kapov, D. and Skorin-Kapov, J. (2012). A note on Steiner tree games. Networks, 59(2):215–225.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  75. Streekstra, L. and Trudeau, C. (2020). Stable source connection and assignment problems as multi-period shortest path problems. Discussion Papers on Business and Economics 7/2020, University of Southern Denmark.

  76. Subiza, B., Giménez-Gómez, J.-M., and Peris, J. E. (2016). Folk solution for simple minimum cost spanning tree problems. Operations Research Letters, 44(5):598–601.

  77. Sziklai, B., Fleiner, T., and Solymosi, T. (2016). On the core and nucleolus of directed acyclic graph games. Mathematical Programming, 163(1):243–271.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  78. Tijs, S., Branzei, R., Moretti, S., and Norde, H. (2006). Obligation rules for minimum cost spanning tree situations and their monotonicity properties. European Journal of Operational Research, 175(1):121–134.

  79. Tijs, S., Moretti, S., Branzei, R., and Norde, H. (2006). The Bird core for minimum cost spanning tree problems revisited: Monotonicity and additivity aspects. In Seeger, A., editor, Recent Advances in Optimization, volume 563 of Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, pages 305–322. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg.

  80. Trudeau, C. (2012). A new stable and more responsible cost sharing solution for mcst problems. Games and Economic Behavior, 75(1):402–412.

  81. Trudeau, C. (2013). Characterizations of the Kar and folk solutions for minimum cost spanning tree problems. International Game Theory Review, 15(2):1340003–16.

  82. Trudeau, C. (2014). Characterizations of the cycle-complete and folk solutions for minimum cost spanning tree problems. Social Choice and Welfare, 42(4):941–957.

  83. Trudeau, C. (2014). Linking the Kar and folk solutions through a problem separation property. International Journal of Game Theory, 43:845–870.

  84. Trudeau, C. (2014). Minimum cost spanning tree problems with indifferent agents. Games and Economic Behavior, 84:137–151.

  85. Trudeau, C. and Vidal-Puga, J. (2017). On the set of extreme core allocations for minimal cost spanning tree problems. Journal of Economic Theory, 169:425–452.

  86. Trudeau, C. and Vidal-Puga, J. (2019). The Shapley value in minimum cost spanning tree problems. In Algaba, E., Fragnelli, V., and Sánchez-Soriano, J., editors, Chapters in Game Theory: The Shapley value, chapter 24. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  87. Trudeau, C. and Vidal-Puga, J. (2020). Clique games: A family of games with coincidence between the nucleolus and the shapley value. Mathematical Social Sciences, 103:8–14.

  88. Vidal-Puga, J. (2004). Bargaining with commitments. International Journal of Game Theory, 33(1):129–144.

  89. von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton UP, first edition.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  90. Weber, R. (1988). Probabilistic values for games. In Roth, A. E., editor, The Shapley value: Essays in honour of Lloyds S. Shapley, pages 101–119. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. From Bargaining Solutions to Claims Rules: A Proportional Approach. (2013). Peris, Josep E. ; Giménez-Gómez, José-Manuel ; Osorio, Antonio ; Gimenez-Gomez, Jose-Manuel.
    In: QM&ET Working Papers.
    RePEc:ris:qmetal:2013_002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The pseudo-average rule: bankruptcy, cost allocation and bargaining. (2011). Ortells, Txus ; Santos, Juan.
    In: Mathematical Methods of Operations Research.
    RePEc:spr:mathme:v:73:y:2011:i:1:p:55-73.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Equality preference in the claims problem: a questionnaire study of cuts in earnings and pensions. (2009). Schokkaert, Erik ; Bosmans, Kristof.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:33:y:2009:i:4:p:533-557.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The minimal overlap rule revisited. (2008). Silva, Jose ; Alcalde, Jose ; Marco, Maria.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:31:y:2008:i:1:p:109-128.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. An axiomatization of the leveling tax-transfer policy. (2008). Dagan, Nir.
    In: Economic theory and game theory.
    RePEc:nid:ndagan:020.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Manipulating Allocation Justice: How Framing Effects can Increase the Prevalence of the Talmudic Division Principle Shnaim Ohazin. (2008). Fink, Michael ; Berzak, Yevgeni.
    In: Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:huj:dispap:dp479.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. On the existence of consistent rules to adjudicate conflicting claims: a constructive geometric approach. (2007). Thomson, William.
    In: Review of Economic Design.
    RePEc:spr:reecde:v:11:y:2007:i:3:p:225-251.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. On the convergence of the random arrival rule in large claims problems. (2007). Chun, Youngsub ; Lee, Junghoon.
    In: International Journal of Game Theory.
    RePEc:spr:jogath:v:36:y:2007:i:2:p:259-273.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Composition, Securement, and Concede-and-divide. (2006). Moreno-Ternero, Juan.
    In: Spanish Economic Review.
    RePEc:spr:specre:v:8:y:2006:i:3:p:227-237.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Protective Properties and the Constrained Equal Awards Rule for Claims Problems: A Note. (2006). Yeh, Chun-Hsien.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:27:y:2006:i:2:p:221-230.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. New characterizations of a classical bankruptcy rule. (2006). Villar, Antonio ; Moreno-Ternero, Juan.
    In: Review of Economic Design.
    RePEc:spr:reecde:v:10:y:2006:i:2:p:73-84.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Minimal rights based solidarity. (2006). LUTTENS, R. I..
    In: Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium.
    RePEc:rug:rugwps:06/356.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Operators for the adjudication of conflicting claims. (2006). Yeh, Chun-Hsien ; Thomson, William.
    In: RCER Working Papers.
    RePEc:roc:rocher:531.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. A Characterization of a Family of Rules for the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims. (2006). Thomson, William.
    In: RCER Working Papers.
    RePEc:roc:rocher:530.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The Two-Agent Claims-Truncated Proportional Rule Has No Consistent Extension: A Constructive Proof. (2006). Thomson, William.
    In: RCER Working Papers.
    RePEc:roc:rocher:529.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. On the Existence of Consistent Rules to Adjudicate Conflicting Claims: A Constructive Geometric Approach. (2006). Thomson, William.
    In: RCER Working Papers.
    RePEc:roc:rocher:528.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Evolution of Division Rules. (2006). Rai, Birendra.
    In: Papers on Strategic Interaction.
    RePEc:esi:discus:2006-27.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Lost in Translation? Basis Utility and Proportionality in Games. (2005). Feldman, Barry.
    In: Game Theory and Information.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpga:0507001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Using Game Theory to Increase Students Motivation to Learn Mathematics. (2005). Ein-Ya, Gura.
    In: Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:huj:dispap:dp384.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Sharing Variable Returns of Cooperation. (2005). Koster, Maurice.
    In: CeNDEF Working Papers.
    RePEc:ams:ndfwpp:05-06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Economic utopia of the Torah. Economic concepts of the Hebrew Bible interpreted according to the Rabbinical Literature. (2004). Mangeloja, Esa.
    In: Method and Hist of Econ Thought.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpmh:0405004.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Convergence under Replication of Rules to Adjudicate Conflicting Claims. (2004). Thomson, William ; Chun, Youngsub.
    In: RCER Working Papers.
    RePEc:roc:rocher:512.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. A New Solution to the Problem of Adjudicating Conflicting Claims. (2004). Thomson, William ; Dominguez, Diego.
    In: RCER Working Papers.
    RePEc:roc:rocher:511.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. On the Adjudication of Conflicting Claims: An Experimental Study. (2004). Moreno-Ternero, Juan ; Herrero, Carmen ; C., .
    In: Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings.
    RePEc:ecm:nasm04:166.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Fifty Years of the Nash Program, 1953-2003. (2004). Serrano, Roberto.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bro:econwp:2004-20.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Additive rules in bankruptcy problems and other related problems. (2003). Vidal-Puga, Juan ; Bergantiños, Gustavo.
    In: Game Theory and Information.
    RePEc:wpa:wuwpga:0304001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. EVEN ALLOCATIONS FOR GENERALISED RATIONING PROBLEMS. (2003). Mariotti, Marco.
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2003-10.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. THE TALMUD RULE AND THE SECUREMENT OF AGENTS? AWARDS. (2003). Villar, Antonio ; Moreno-Ternero, Juan ; Notario, Antonio Villar ; Juan de Dios Moreno Ternero, .
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2003-05.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. AN EXPERIMENT ON BANKRUPTCY. (2003). Ponti, Giovanni ; Moreno-Ternero, Juan ; Herrero, Carmen ; Blanco, Carmen Herrero ; Juan de Dios Moreno Ternero, .
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2003-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Probabilistic choice in games: properties of Rosenthals t-solutions. (2003). Voorneveld, Mark.
    In: SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance.
    RePEc:hhs:hastef:0542.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Sustainability in bankruptcy problems. (2002). Villar, Antonio ; Herrero, Carmen.
    In: TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research.
    RePEc:spr:topjnl:v:10:y:2002:i:2:p:261-273.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. BANKRUPTCY GAMES AND THE IBN EZRAS PROPOSAL. (2002). Silva, Jose ; Alcalde, Jose ; Maria del Carmen Marco, .
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2002-28.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. BANKRUPTCY RULES AND PROGRESSIVE TAXATION. (2002). Villar, Antonio ; Moreno-Ternero, Juan ; Notario, Antonio Villar ; Juan de Dios Moreno Ternero, .
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2002-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Nash Bargaining Solution with Coalitions and The Joint Bargaining Paradox. (2001). Heidhues, Paul ; Chae, Suchan .
    In: CIG Working Papers.
    RePEc:wzb:wzebiv:fsiv01-15.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Axiomatization of Ratio Equilibria in Public Good Economies.. (2001). Wooders, Myrna ; van den Nouweland, A..
    In: The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS).
    RePEc:wrk:warwec:585.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Operations research games: A survey. (2001). Hendrickx, Ruud ; Borm, Peter ; Hamers, Herbert.
    In: TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research.
    RePEc:spr:topjnl:v:9:y:2001:i:2:p:139-199.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. THE TAL-FAMILY OF RULES FOR BANKRUPTCY PROBLEMS. (2001). Villar, Antonio ; Moreno-Ternero, Juan ; Notario, Antonio Villar ; Juan D. Moreno Ternero, .
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2001-33.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. A Minimal Test for Convex Games and the Shapley Value. (2001). Voorneveld, Mark ; Grahn, Sofia .
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:uunewp:2001_002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. A Dual Egalitarian Solution. (2001). Slikker, Marco ; Klijn, Flip ; Tijs, Stef.
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-01c70007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. THE THREE MUSKETEERS: FOUR CLASSICAL SOLUTIONS TO BANKRUPTCY PROBLEMS. (2000). Villar, Antonio ; Herrero, Carmen ; Notario, Antonio Villar ; Blanco, Carmen Herrero .
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:2000-23.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The Three Musketeers. Old Solutions to Bankruptcy Problems. (2000). Herrero, Carmen.
    In: Econometric Society World Congress 2000 Contributed Papers.
    RePEc:ecm:wc2000:0609.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Feasible Implementation of Taxation Methods. (1999). Volij, Oscar ; Serrano, Roberto ; Dagan, Nir.
    In: Economic theory and game theory.
    RePEc:nid:ndagan:009.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. - PREEMINENCE AND SUSTAINABILITY IN BANKRUPTCY PROBLEMS. (1998). Villar, Antonio ; Herrero, Carmen ; Notario, Antonio Villar ; Blanco, Carmen Herrero .
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:1998-17.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. A proposal to unify some concepts in the theory of fairness. (1997). Iturbe-Ormaetxe, Inigo ; Corchon, Luis.
    In: Working Papers. Serie AD.
    RePEc:ivi:wpasad:1997-21.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. New characterizations of old bankruptcy rules. (1996). Dagan, Nir.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:13:y:1996:i:1:p:51-59.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Identical preferences lower bound solution and consistency in economies with indivisible goods. (1996). Bevia, Carmen.
    In: Social Choice and Welfare.
    RePEc:spr:sochwe:v:13:y:1996:i:1:p:113-126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Strategy-Proof Allotment Rules. (1995). Jackson, Matthew ; Barberà, Salvador.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:nwu:cmsems:1142.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Compromise values in cooperative game theory. (1993). Tijs, Stef ; Otten, Gert-Jan.
    In: TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research.
    RePEc:spr:topjnl:v:1:y:1993:i:1:p:1-36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. A Strategic Form for a Convex Game. (1988). Nakayama, M..
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:nwu:cmsems:765.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Adaptive Play in Multiplayer Bargaining Situations. (). Agastya, Murali.
    In: ELSE working papers.
    RePEc:els:esrcls:007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-04 13:59:21 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.