Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Using Alternative Student Growth Measures for Evaluating Teacher Performance: What the Literature Says.. (2013). Gill, Brian ; Booker, Kevin ; Bruch, Julie .
In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
RePEc:mpr:mprres:7896.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 46

References cited by this document

Cocites: 47

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Can More Teachers Be Covered? The Accuracy, Credibility, and Precision of Value-Added Estimates with Proxy Pre-Tests. (). Walsh, Elias ; Liu, Albert Y ; Dotter, Dallas .
    In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
    RePEc:mpr:mprres:c61e6b4de71b4741b12bc978d6d29bcf.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. (2010). Evaluating teachers: The important role of value-added. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. aspx?DocumentID=134104 Ohio Department of Education. (2012b). Ohio teacher evaluation system model. Retrieved October 30, 2012, from http://www.ode.state.oh.us/GD/DocumentManagement/ DocumentDownload.aspx?DocumentID=128955 Papay, J. P. (2011). Different tests, different answers: The stability of teacher value-added estimates across outcome measures. American Educational Research Journal, 48(1), 163–193.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  3. Atlanta: Author. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from http://www.doe.k12.ga.us/ School-Improvement/Teacher-and-Leader-Effectiveness/Documents/SLO%20Manual. pdf Glazerman, S., Goldhaber, D., Loeb, S., Raudenbush, S., Staiger, D., & Whitehurst, G.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Austin Independent School District. (2012). AISD REACH Program Update, 2010–2011: Participant feedback. (Department of Research and Evaluation Report 10.86 RB). Austin: Author. Retrieved December 13, 2012, from http://www.austinisd.org/sites/default/files/ dre-reports/rb/10.86RB_AISD_Reach_Participant_Feedback_2010–2011_0.pdf Bagshaw, T., & Holdheide, L. (2010). Special education teacher evaluation: Issues and answers. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2010). Learning about teaching: Initial findings from the Measures of Effective Teaching project. (MET Project Research Paper.) Seattle: Author.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  6. Boston: Author. Retrieved February 27, 2013, from http://www.ctacusa.com/PDFs/ MoreThanMoney-report.pdf Corcoran, S. P., Jennings, J. L., & Beveridge, A. A. (2011). Teacher effectiveness and highand low-stakes tests. (Working paper). New York: New York University. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from https://files.nyu.edu/sc129/public/papers/corcoran_jennings_ beveridge_2011_wkg_teacher_effects.pdf Curtis, R. (2012a). Building it together: The design and implementation of Hillsborough County Public Schools’ teacher evaluation system. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Burnett, A., Cushing, E., & Bivona, L. (2012). Use of multiple measures for performance-based compensation. Washington, DC: Center for Educator Compensation Reform. Retrieved December 14, 2012, from http://0-cecr.ed.gov.opac.acc.msmc.edu/pdfs/CECR_MultipleMeasures. pdf Burns, S. F., Gardner C. D., & Meeuwsen, J. (2009). An evaluation of teacher and principal experiences during the pilot phase of AISD REACH: A strategic compensation initiative. Nashville, TN: Peabody College at Vanderbilt University. Retrieved December 13, 2012, from http://discoverarchive.vanderbilt.edu/jspui/bitstream/1803/3379/1/ BurnsGardnerMeeuwsen%20Capstone%20May%202009.pdf Ref-2 Cantrell, S. M. (2012). The measures of effective teaching project: An experiment to build evidence and trust. Education Finance and Policy, 7(2), 203–218.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Casson, C., & Good, B. (2012). Student growth (learning) objectives in Denver: Past experiences and future. Denver: Denver Public Schools. Retrieved December 13, 2012, from https://www.tifcommunity.org/sites/default/files/Session%205B-%20Casson%20&%20 Good-%20Student%20Growth%20Objectives%20in%20Denver.pdf Center for Educator Compensation Reform. (n.d.). Community Training and Assistance Center and the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools Leadership for Educator’s Advanced Performance. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved December 14, 2012, from http:// www.cecr.ed.gov/initiatives/profiles/pdfs/CommunityTrainingandAssistanceCenter. pdf Clark. L. (2002). The hard drive to student growth. School Administrator, 4(59), 24–27.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. charterschooldissemination.org/images/stories/TEAMS%20Playbook/TEAMS_ Playbook_5–7-12.pdf Mihaly, K., McCaffrey, D. F., Staiger, D. O., & Lockwood, J. R. (2013). A composite estimator of effective teaching. (MET Project Research Paper). Seattle: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Retrieved January 9, 2013, from http://www.metproject.org/downloads/ MET_Composite_Estimator_of_Effective_Teaching_Research_Paper.pdf Miller, A. (2012). RISE student learning objectives. Indianapolis: Teacher Incentive Fund, Indiana Department of Education. Retrieved December 14, 2012, from https://www. tifcommunity.org/index.php?q=content/session-7-combining-measures NCTechNews. (2012). North Carolina to use SAS EVAAS for K-12 in teacher, principal evaluations.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  10. com/appam/2012/webprogram/Paper3443.html Georgia Department of Education. (2011). Teacher keys evaluation system handbook: Pilot, January–May 2012. Atlanta: Author. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from http://legisweb.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Community Training and Assistance Center. (2004). Catalyst for change: Pay for performance in Denver: Final report. Boston: Author. Retrieved May 4, 2012, from http:// www.ctacusa.com/PDFs/Rpt-CatalystChangeFull-2004.pdf Community Training and Assistance Center. (2013). It’s more than the money.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. District of Columbia Public Schools. (2011a). IMPACT: The DCPS effectiveness assessment system for school-based personnel, 2011–2012. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from http://www.dc.gov/DCPS/Files/downloads/TEACHING%20 &%20LEARNING/IMPACT/IMPACT%20Guidebooks%202010–2011/Impact%20 2011%20Group%202-Aug11.pdf Ref-3 District of Columbia Public Schools. (2011b). Teacher-assessed student achievement data (TAS) guidance. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from http:// www.isbe.net/peac/pdf/DCPS_SLO_guidance_022412.pdf EducationCounsel. (2012, February). Student learning objectives: An emerging framework. Presented to the Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council, Springfield, IL.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Goe, L., & Holdheide, L. (2011). Measuring teachers’ contributions to student learning: Growth for nontested grades and subjects. (Research & Policy Brief). Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  14. Goldhaber, D., & Chaplin, D. (2012). Assessing the Rothstein test: Does it really show teacher value-added models are biased? (Working paper). Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research. Retrieved December 17, 2012, from http://mathematica-mpr.com/ publications/pdfs/education/rothstein_wp.pdf Goldhaber, D., & Hansen, M. (2010). Is it just a bad class? Assessing the stability of measured teacher performance. (CEDR Working Paper 2010-3). Seattle: Center for Education Data and Research.

  15. Goldhaber, D., & Walch, J. (2011). Strategic pay reform: A student outcomes-based evaluation of Denver’s ProComp teacher pay initiative. Economics of Education Review, 31(6), 1067–1083.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. Gray, J. J. (2010). Are principals good at identifying effective teachers? A comparison of teachers’ principal ratings and residual gains on standardized tests. (Doctoral dissertation, Kansas University, 2010). Retrieved December 13, 2012, from http:// kuscholarworks.ku.edu/dspace/bitstream/1808/6765/1/Gray_ku_0099D_10785_ DATA_1.pdf Ref-4 Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2012). Skills, productivity and the evaluation of teacher performance.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  17. Indiana Department of Education. (n.d.). RISE Evaluation and Development System: Student learning objectives handbook. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from http://www.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. June 29. Retrieved October 30, 2012, from http://nctechnews.com/2012/06/ 29/saas/north-carolina-to-use-sas%c2%ae-evaas%c2%ae-for-k-12-in-teacher -principal-evaluations/7471/ Ref-6 New Haven Public Schools. (2010). NHPS teacher evaluation and development: Student learning goals. Retrieved October 30, 2012, from http://www.nhps.net/sites/default/ files/8__Student_Learning_Growth_-_Goal_Setting_Introduction_100825.pdf New York State Education Department. (2012a). Guidance on the New York State District -wide growth goal-setting process: Student learning objectives. Albany: Author.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Kane, T. J., McCaffrey, D. F., Miller, T., & Staiger, D. O. (2013). Have we identified effective teachers? (MET Project Research Paper). Seattle: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  20. Koedel, C., & Betts, J. (2010). Value-added to what? How a ceiling in the testing instrument influences value-added estimation. Education Finance and Policy, 5(1), 54–81.

  21. Lachlan-Haché, L. (2012). SLO implementation considerations: Communication, training, and assessment literacy. Santa Monica, CA: Teacher Incentive Fund. Retrieved December 13, 2012, from https://www.tifcommunity.org/sites/default/files/Session%205A-%20 Lachlan%20Hache%20SLO%20Implementation%20Considerations.pdf Lachlan-Haché, L., Cushing, E., & Bivona, L. (2012). Student learning objectives: Benefits, challenges, and solutions. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Retrieved December 13, 2012, from http://educatortalent.airprojects.org/inc/docs/SLOs_Benefits_ Challenges_Solutions.pdf Ref-5 Lipscomb, S., Gill, B., Booker, K., & Johnson, M. (2010). Estimating teacher and school effectiveness in Pittsburgh: Value-added modeling and results, second edition. (Report to Pittsburgh Public Schools). Cambridge, MA: Mathematica Policy Research.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Lockwood, J. R., McCaffrey, D. F., Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B., Le, V., & Martinez, J. F. (2007). The sensitivity of value-added teacher effect estimates to different mathematics achievement measures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44(1), 47–67.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Lombardi, K. A. (2011). Testing the limits: The purposes and effects of additional, external elementary mathematics assessment. Lawrence, KS: Kansas University. Retrieved December 14, 2012, from http://kuscholarworks.ku.edu/dspace/bitstream/1808/8149/1/ Lombardi_ku_0099D_11347_DATA_1.pdf Marietta, G. (n.d.). Multiple measures of teacher effectiveness in Hillsborough County Public Schools: Implementing value-added measures. Seattle: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. metproject.org/downloads/MET_Gathering_Feedback_Research_Paper.pdf Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2013). Ensuring fair and reliable measures of effective teaching.(METProjectPolicyandPractitionerBrief).Seattle:Author.RetrievedJanuary 9, 2013, from http://metproject.org/downloads/MET_Ensuring_Fair_and_Reliable_ Measures_Practitioner_Brief.pdf Brodsky, A., DeCesare, D., & Kramer-Wine, J. (2010). Design and implementation considerations for alternative teacher compensation programs. Theory Into Practice, 49(3), 213–222.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Meyer, R. H., Carl, B., & Cheng, H. E. (2010). Accountability and performance in secondary education in Milwaukee Public Schools. (The Senior Urban Education Research Fellowship Series, vol. II). Washington, DC: The Council of the Great City Schools.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  26. Potamites, L., Booker, K., Chaplin, D., & Isenberg, E. (2009). Measuring school and teacher effectiveness in the EPIC Charter School Consortium—year 2: Final report. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.

  27. Potamites, L., Chaplin, D., Isenberg, E., & Booker, K. (2009). Measuring school effectiveness in Memphis—year 2: Final report. Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Prince, C. D., Shuermann, P. J., Guthrie, J. W., Witham, P. J., Milanowski, A. T., & Thorn, C. A. (2009). The other 69percent: Fairly rewarding the performance of teachers of nontested subjects and grades. Washington, DC: Center for Educator Compensation Reform. Retrieved December 14, 2012, from http://www.cecr.ed.gov/guides/ other69Percent.pdf Proctor, D., Walters, B., Reichardt, R., Goldhaber, D., & Walch, J. (2011). Making a difference in education reform: ProComp external evaluation report 2006–2010. Prepared for the Denver Public Schools. Denver: The Evaluation Center, University of Colorado.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Race to the Top Technical Assistance Network. (n.d.). Measuring student growth for teachers in nontested grades and subjects: A primer. Retrieved December 13, 2012, from http:// www.swcompcenter.org/educator_effectiveness2/NTS__PRIMER_FINAL.pdf Reform Support Network. (2012). Lessons learned around developing and implementing student learning objectives. Prepared for the Maryland Department of Education.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Ref-7 Retrieved December 13, 2012, from http://www.marylandeducators.org/uploadedFiles/ MSEA_Content/Your_Profession/School_Quality/Student%20Learning%20 Objectives.pdf Reform Support Network. (n.d.). Targeting growth: Using student learning objectives as a measure of educator effectiveness. Retrieved December 13, 2012, from http://ok.gov/sde/ sites/ok.gov.sde/files/TLE-NonTestedGradesSub-SLOTargeting.pdf Rothstein, J. (2010). Teacher quality in education production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 175–214.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  31. Ref-8 Tennessee Department of Education. (2012). Teacher evaluation in Tennessee: A report on year 1 implementation. Nashville, TN: Author. Retrieved December 14, 2012, from http://www.tn.gov/education/doc/yr_1_tchr_eval_rpt.pdf Terry, B. D. (2008). Paying for results: Examining incentive pay in Texas schools. Austin: Texas Public Policy Foundation. Retrieved December 13, 2012, from http://www. broadeducation.org/asset/1128-paying%20for%20results.pdf TNTP. (2011). DCPS-TNTP IMPACT conference: Focus on measuring student achievement.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Retrieved December 13, 2012, from http://www.ode.state.or.us/initiatives/elearning/ nasdse/jan12presentationslides.pdf Battelle for Kids. (n.d.). Frequently asked questions, Ohio value-added high schools. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from http://portal.battelleforkids.org/Ohio/SOAR/High_School_ Initiative/FAQs.html?sflang=en Biancarosa, G., Bryk, A., & Dexter, E. R. (2010). Assessing the value-added effects of literacy collaborative professional development on student learning. The Elementary School Journal, 111(1), 7–34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Retrieved December 14, 2012, from http://www.cgcs.org/cms/lib/DC00001581/ Centricity/Domain/85/Milwaukee_FellowReport2010.pdf Michigan Association of Public School Academies. (2012). TEAMS (Teacher Excellence and Academic Milestones for Students) playbook. Lansing, MI: Michigan Association of Public School Academies. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from http://www.teams.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Retrieved December 14, 2012, from http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/ technical_reports/2010/RAND_TR917.pdf Sturman, M. C., Cheramie, R. A., & and Cashen, L. H. (2005). The impact of job complexity and performance measurement on the temporal consistency, stability, and test-retest reliability of employee job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(2), 269–283.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Retrieved December 17, 2012, from http://www.aspendrl.org/portal/browse/ DocumentDetail?documentId=1068&download Curtis, R. (2012b). Putting the pieces in place: Charlotte-Mecklenburg Public Schools’ teacher evaluation system. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute. Retrieved December 17, 2012, from http://www.aspeninstitute.org/sites/default/files/content/docs/pubs/ed -CharlotteREP4.pdf Dawson, L., Mallory, K., & Johnson, K. (2011). A focus on individual student growth. Leadership, 40(3), 22–26.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. Retrieved January 9, 2013, from http://metproject.org/downloads/MET_Validating_ Using_Random_Assignment_Research_Paper.pdf Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2008). Estimating teacher impacts on student achievement: An experimental evaluation. (Working Paper No. 14607). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved December 17, 2012, from http://www.nber. org/papers/w14607 Keller, B. (2006). Test-tied bonuses to take effect in Houston. Education Week, 25(19), 5–12.

  37. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from http://engageny.org/sites/default/files/resource/ attachments/slo-guidance.pdf New York State Education Department. (2012b). New York State district-wide growth goal setting process: Student learning objectives. Road map for districts. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from http://engageny.org/sites/default/files/resource/attachments/slo-roadmap.pdf Ohio Department of Education. (2012a). A guide to using student learning objectives as a locally-determined measure of student growth. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from http://www.ode.state.oh.us/GD/DocumentManagement/DocumentDownload.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  38. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from http://www.fadss.org/_docs/_content/eet/ caseStudyHCPS/ImplementingValue-addedMeasuresHCPS.pdf McCaffrey, D. F., Sass, T. R., Lockwood, J. R., & Mihaly, K. (2009). The intertemporal variability of teacher effect estimates. Education Finance and Policy, 4(4), 572–606.

  39. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from http://www.gatesfoundation.org/college-ready -education/Documents/preliminary-findings-research-paper.pdf Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. (2012). Gathering feedback for teaching. (MET Project Research Paper). Seattle: Author. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from http://www.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  40. Retrieved October 23, 2012, from http://www.isbe.state.il.us/peac/pdf/slo_emerg_ frmwk_pres_02–12.pdf Fulbeck, E. S., & Farley, A. N. (2012, November). Denver ProComp: Teachers’ attitudes and behaviors. Presented at the annual conference of the Association for Public Policy & Analysis, Baltimore, MD. Retrieved December 13, 2012, from http://appam.confex.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Retrieved October 30, 2012, from http://tntp.org/assets/misc/20110602_IMPACT_ conference_msa_final.pdf?images/uploads/20110602_IMPACT_conference_msa_final. pdf TNTP. (2012). Summer report: Creating a culture of excellence in Indiana schools. Prepared for Indiana Department of Education. Retrieved December 13, 2012, from http://www.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  42. riseindiana.org/sites/default/files/files/Student%20Learning/Student%20Learning%20 Objectives%20Handbook%201%200%20FINAL.pdf Jackson, C. K. (2012). Teacher quality at the high-school level: The importance of accounting for tracks. (Working Paper No. 17722). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved December 13, 2012, from http://www.nber.org/papers/w17722 Johnson, M., Lipscomb, S., Gill, B., Booker, K., & Bruch, J. (2012). Value-added models for the Pittsburgh Public Schools. (Report to Pittsburgh Public Schools). Cambridge, MA: Mathematica Policy Research.

  43. Sass, T. R. (2008). The stability of value-added measures of teacher quality and implications for teacher compensation policy. (National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research Brief 4). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Retrieved December 13, 2012, from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/1001266_stabilityofvalue. pdf Sass, T. R. (2011). Certification requirements and teacher quality: A comparison of alternative routes to teaching. Atlanta: Georgia State University. Retrieved December 13, 2012, from http://www2.gsu.edu/~tsass/Alternative%20Certification%20and%20Teacher%20 Quality%2011.pdf Sawchuk, S. (2011). Wanted: Ways to measure most teachers. Education Week, 30(19), 1–15.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Schmitt, L., & Ibanez, N. (n.d.). AISD REACH program update: 2009–2010 Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) results and student learning objectives (SLOs). (Department of Program Evaluation Publication 09.83 RB). Austin: Austin Independent School District.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  45. Schochet, P., & Chiang, H. S. (2010). Error rates in measuring teacher and school performance based on student test score gains. (NCEE 2010–4004). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

  46. SCORE. (2012). TVAAS: An introduction to value-added in Tennessee. (Taking Note: Examining Key Education Reform Ideas in Tennessee, June 2012). Nashville, TN: Author. Retrieved December 13, 2012, from http://www.tnscore.org/wp-content/ uploads/2010/12/SCORE_TVAAS4.pdf Steele, J. L., Hamilton, L. S., & Stecher, B. M. (2010). Incorporating student performance measures into teacher evaluation systems. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. The effects of serious gaming on risk perceptions of climate tipping points. (2022). Reed, Jason B ; Prokopy, Linda ; Milkoreit, Manjana ; Beek, Lisette ; Weiner, Roberta ; Wardekker, Arjan ; Vervoort, Joost ; Breed, Jason.
    In: Climatic Change.
    RePEc:spr:climat:v:170:y:2022:i:3:d:10.1007_s10584-022-03318-x.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. The Mechanics of Treatment-effect Estimate Bias for Nonexperimental Data. (2022). Berends, Mark ; Penaloza, Roberto V.
    In: Sociological Methods & Research.
    RePEc:sae:somere:v:51:y:2022:i:1:p:165-202.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. School Differences in Social–Emotional Learning Gains: Findings From the First Large-Scale Panel Survey of Students. (2019). West, Martin R ; Rice, Andrew B ; Meyer, Robert H ; Hough, Heather ; Christian, Michael S ; Loeb, Susanna.
    In: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics.
    RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:44:y:2019:i:5:p:507-542.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Good Schools or Good Students? The Importance of Selectivity for School Rankings. (2019). Sweetman, Olive ; O'Neill, Donal ; Doris, Aedín.
    In: Economics, Finance and Accounting Department Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:may:mayecw:n293-19.pdf.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Good Schools or Good Students? The Importance of Selectivity for School Rankings. (2019). Sweetman, Olive ; O'Neill, Donal ; Doris, Aedín.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp12459.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Measuring Quality for Use in Incentive Schemes: The Case of “Shrinkage” Estimators. (2018). Mehta, Nirav.
    In: EconStor Preprints.
    RePEc:zbw:esprep:180846.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Does the precision and stability of value-added estimates of teacher performance depend on the types of students they serve?. (2018). Stacy, Brian ; Wooldridge, Jeffrey ; Guarino, Cassandra.
    In: Economics of Education Review.
    RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:64:y:2018:i:c:p:50-74.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. The common core conundrum: To what extent should we worry that changes to assessments will affect test-based measures of teacher performance?. (2018). Xu, Zeyu ; Koedel, Cory ; Miller, Luke C ; Goldhaber, Dan ; Cowan, James ; Backes, Ben.
    In: Economics of Education Review.
    RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:62:y:2018:i:c:p:48-65.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Measuring Quality for Use in Incentive Schemes: The Case of Shrinkage Estimators. (2018). Mehta, Nirav.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7163.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Task-specific experience and task-specific talent: Decomposing the productivity of high school teachers. (2016). Mansfield, Richard ; Cook, Jason.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:140:y:2016:i:c:p:51-72.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Does Attending a Low-Achieving School Affect High-Performing Student Outcomes?. (2015). Parsons, Eric.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:umc:wpaper:1407.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. The Efficiency Implications of Using Proportional Evaluations to Shape the Teaching Workforce. (2015). Koedel, Cory ; Li, Jiaxi .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:umc:wpaper:1402.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Teacher Quality and Student Inequality. (2015). Mansfield, Richard.
    In: Journal of Labor Economics.
    RePEc:ucp:jlabec:doi:10.1086/679683.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Education Research and Administrative Data. (2015). Salvanes, Kjell G ; Karbownik, Krzysztof ; Figlio, David.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:21592.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Productivity returns to experience in the teacher labor market: Methodological challenges and new evidence on long-term career improvement. (2015). Papay, John P ; Kraft, Matthew A.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:130:y:2015:i:c:p:105-119.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Grades and rank: Impacts of non-financial incentives on test performance. (2015). Joensen, Juanna ; Pellas, Elin ; Jalava, Nina .
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:115:y:2015:i:c:p:161-196.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Value-added modeling: A review. (2015). Mihaly, Kata ; Koedel, Cory ; Rockoff, Jonah E.
    In: Economics of Education Review.
    RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:47:y:2015:i:c:p:180-195.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Ranking Teachers when Teacher Value-Added is Heterogeneous Across Students. (2014). Stacy, Brian.
    In: EconStor Preprints.
    RePEc:zbw:esprep:104743.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Impact of School Quality on Educational Attainment - Evidence from Finnish High Schools. (2014). Kortelainen, Mika ; Pursiainen, Heikki ; Pkknen, Jenni .
    In: ERSA conference papers.
    RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa14p711.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. How to Make Additional Time Matter: Integrating Individualized Tutorials into an Extended Day. (2014). Kraft, Matthew.
    In: Education Finance and Policy.
    RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:9:y:2014:i:4:p:81-116.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Composition, Context, and Endogeneity in School and Teacher Comparisons. (2014). Rabe-Hesketh, Sophia.
    In: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics.
    RePEc:sae:jedbes:v:39:y:2014:i:5:p:333-367.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Value-Added Models for the Pittsburgh Public Schools, 2012-13 School Year.. (2014). Gill, Brian ; Johnson, Matthew ; Rotz, Dana.
    In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
    RePEc:mpr:mprres:8134.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. How Do Test Scores at the Floor and Ceiling Affect Value-Added Estimates?. (2014). Alexandra Resch Eric Isenberg, .
    In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
    RePEc:mpr:mprres:80fbbeb5dd504dbab6c51e4d8b401fb1.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Value-Added Models for the Pittsburgh Public Schools, 2012-13 School Year. (2014). Gill, Brian ; Johnson, Matthew ; Rotz, Dana.
    In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
    RePEc:mpr:mprres:11cf6795ac3842b996637b08e56d3f06.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Grades and Rank: Impacts of Non-Financial Incentives on Test Performance. (2014). Joensen, Juanna ; Pellas, Elin ; Jalava, Nina .
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp8412.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Skills, productivity and the evaluation of teacher performance. (2014). Sass, Tim ; Harris, Douglas.
    In: Economics of Education Review.
    RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:40:y:2014:i:c:p:183-204.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. How Do Teachers Improve? The Relative Importance of Specific and General Human Capital. (2014). Ost, Ben.
    In: American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.
    RePEc:aea:aejapp:v:6:y:2014:i:2:p:127-51.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. The Icarus Syndrome: Why Do Some High Flyers Soar While Others Fall?. (2013). Parsons, Eric .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:umc:wpaper:1308.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Managing the Teacher Workforce in Austere Times: The Determinants and Implications of Teacher Layoffs. (2013). Goldhaber, Dan ; Theobald, Roddy .
    In: Education Finance and Policy.
    RePEc:tpr:edfpol:v:8:y:2013:i:4:p:494-527.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Classroom Observations from Phase 2 of the Pennsylvania Teacher Evaluation Pilot: Assessing Internal Consistency, Score Variation, and Relationships with Value Added. (2013). Elias Walsh Stephen Lipscomb, .
    In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
    RePEc:mpr:mprres:a6b29a4a217f42a09d5206cfe6520f0e.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Using Alternative Student Growth Measures for Evaluating Teacher Performance: What the Literature Says. (2013). Gill, Brian ; Booker, Kevin ; Bruch, Julie .
    In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
    RePEc:mpr:mprres:85b7a88ce0cf4597a7efd7a21983eafc.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Using Alternative Student Growth Measures for Evaluating Teacher Performance: What the Literature Says.. (2013). Gill, Brian ; Booker, Kevin ; Bruch, Julie .
    In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
    RePEc:mpr:mprres:7896.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Classroom Observations from Phase 2 of the Pennsylvania Teacher Evaluation Pilot: Assessing Internal Consistency, Score Variation, and Relationships with Value Added.. (2013). Walsh, Elias ; Lipscomb, Stephen.
    In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
    RePEc:mpr:mprres:7817.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. The dynamics of teacher quality. (2013). Wiswall, Matthew.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:100:y:2013:i:c:p:61-78.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Is a good elementary teacher always good? Assessing teacher performance estimates across subjects. (2013). Goldhaber, Dan ; Walch, Joe ; Cowan, James.
    In: Economics of Education Review.
    RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:36:y:2013:i:c:p:216-228.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Test Measurement Error and Inference from Value-Added Models. (2012). Parsons, Eric ; Koedel, Cory ; Leatherman, Rebecca .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:umc:wpaper:1201.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Methods for Accounting for Co-Teaching in Value-Added Models. (2012). Hock, Heinrich ; Heinrich Hock Eric Isenberg, .
    In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
    RePEc:mpr:mprres:e53ebf9f792e48dca345a4bba26a1d70.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Methods for Accounting for Co-Teaching in Value-Added Models.. (2012). Isenberg, Eric ; Hock, Heinrich .
    In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
    RePEc:mpr:mprres:7482.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Test Measurement Error and Inference from Value-Added Models. (2012). Parsons, Eric ; Koedel, Cory ; Cory, Koedel ; Eric, Parsons ; Rebecca, Leatherman .
    In: The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy.
    RePEc:bpj:bejeap:v:12:y:2012:i:1:p:1-37:n:59.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. The Relative Performance of Head Start. (2011). Koedel, Cory.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:umc:wpaper:1009.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Teacher training, teacher quality and student achievement. (2011). Sass, Tim ; Harris, Douglas.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:95:y:2011:i:7:p:798-812.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. What a difference a day makes: Estimating daily learning gains during kindergarten and first grade using a natural experiment. (2011). Fitzpatrick, Maria ; Grissmer, David ; Hastedt, Sarah .
    In: Economics of Education Review.
    RePEc:eee:ecoedu:v:30:y:2011:i:2:p:269-279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Estimating Teacher and School Effectiveness in Pittsburgh: Value-Added Modeling and Results.. (2010). Gill, Brian ; Lipscomb, Stephen ; Johnson, Matthew ; Booker, Kevin .
    In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
    RePEc:mpr:mprres:7644.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Teacher and Principal Value-Added: Research Findings and Implementation Practices.. (2010). Owens, Antoniya ; Lipscomb, Stephen ; Chiang, Hanley ; Gill, Brian ; Teh, Bing-Ru .
    In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
    RePEc:mpr:mprres:6941.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Estimating Teacher and School Effectiveness in Pittsburgh Value-Added Modeling and Results. (2010). Gill, Brian ; Lipscomb, Stephen ; Johnson, Matthew ; Booker, Kevin .
    In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
    RePEc:mpr:mprres:600966d791a14d6497505b8703d9179c.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Teacher and Principal Value-Added: Research Findings and Implementation Practices. (1994). Owens, Antoniya ; Lipscomb, Stephen ; Chiang, Hanley ; Gill, Brian ; Teh, Bing-Ru .
    In: Mathematica Policy Research Reports.
    RePEc:mpr:mprres:b024faae6179407da5b887263239ebe9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-23 11:46:27 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.