Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

create a website
When can lotteries improve public procurement processes?. (2022). Serebrisky, Tomas ; Foucart, Renaud ; Estache, Antonio.
In: Working Papers.
RePEc:lan:wpaper:359001116.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 36

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. (2018). Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Agranov, M., & Ortoleva, P. (2017). Stochastic choice and preferences for randomization. Journal of Political Economy, 125(1), 40-68.

  3. Anderson, S. P., & Renault, R. (1999). Pricing, product diversity, and search costs: A BertrandChamberlin -Diamond model. The RAND Journal of Economics, 719-735.

  4. Bandiera, O., Best, M. C., Khan, A. Q., & Prat, A. (2021). The allocation of authority in organizations: A field experiment with bureaucrats. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 136(4), 2195-2242.

  5. Bandiera, O., Prat, A., & Valletti, T. (2009). Active and passive waste in government spending: evidence from a policy experiment. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1278-1308.

  6. Bartling, B., Fehr, E., & Herz, H. (2014). The intrinsic value of decision rights. Econometrica, 82(6), 2005-2039.

  7. Berlin: Springer International Publishing Beuve, J. & Saussier, S. (2021). Renegotiations and Renewals of Public Contracts. Review of Industrial Organization (2021) 59:461–482 Bosio, E., Djankov, S., Glaeser, E. L., & Shleifer, A. (2020). Public procurement in law and practice (No. w27188). National Bureau of Economic Research.

  8. Bouacida, E., & Foucart, R. (2021). Rituals of Reason: A Choice-Based Approach to the Acceptability of Lotteries in Allocation Problems, Lancaster University Working Paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  9. Branzoli, N., & Decarolis, F. (2015). Entry and subcontracting in public procurement auctions.

  10. Burguet, R., Ganuza, J. J., & Hauk, E. (2012). Limited liability and mechanism design in procurement. Games and Economic Behavior, 76(1), 15-25.

  11. Caplin, A., & Nalebuff, B. (1991). Aggregation and imperfect competition: On the existence of equilibrium. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 25-59.

  12. Chassang, S., & Ortner, J. (2019). Collusion in auctions with constrained bids: Theory and evidence from public procurement. Journal of Political Economy, 127(5), 2269-2300.

  13. Chillemi, O., & Mezzetti, C. (2011). Procurement under default risk: auctions or lotteries? University of Warwick working paper.

  14. Coviello, D., Guglielmo, A., & Spagnolo, G. (2018). The effect of discretion on procurement performance. Management Science, 64(2), 715-738.

  15. Decarolis, F. (2014). Awarding price, contract performance, and bids screening: Evidence from procurement auctions. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(1), 108-32.

  16. Decarolis, F. (2018). Comparing public procurement auctions. International Economic Review, 59(2), 391-419.

  17. Elster, J. (1989). Solomonic judgements: Studies in the limitation of rationality. Cambridge University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Estache, A. & Iimi, A. (2011). The Economics of Infrastructure Procurement: Theory and Evidence, CEPR, London, UK.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Estache, A., & Foucart, R. (2018). The scope and limits of accounting and judicial courts intervention in inefficient public procurement. Journal of Public Economics, 157, 95-106.

  20. Fadic, M. (2020). Letting luck decide: Government procurement and the growth of small firms.

  21. Fazekas, M. & Blum, J. (2021). Improving Public Procurement Outcomes. Review of Tools and the State of the Evidence Base. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 9690, June Ferraz, C., & Finan, F. (2008). Exposing corrupt politicians: the effects of Brazil's publicly released audits on electoral outcomes. The Quarterly journal of economics, 123(2), 703-745.

  22. Flyvbjerg, B., Ansar, A., Budzier, A., Buhl, S., Cantarelli, C., Garbuio, M., .Glenting, C., Holm, M.S., Lovallo, D., Lunn, D., Molin, E. , Rønnest, A., Stewart, A. & van Wee, B. (2018). Five things you should know about cost overrun. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 118(C), 174-190.

  23. Graves, N., Barnett, A.G., Clarke, P., 2011. Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel. Bmj 343, d4797.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Guasch, J. L., Benitez, D., Portabales, I., & Flor, L. (2017). The renegotiation of public-private partnership contracts: An overview of the recent evolution in Latin America. In Public Private Partnerships for Transport Infrastructure, pp. 57–77. OECD. Series Title: ITF Roundtable Reports.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Guasch, J.-L. (2004). Granting and renegotiating infrastructure concession: Doing it right. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

  26. Kawai, K., & Nakabayashi, J. (2022). Detecting large-scale collusion in procurement auctions. Journal of Political Economy, 130(5), 000-000.

  27. Klemperer, P. (1998). Auctions with almost common values: The Wallet Game and its applications. European Economic Review, 42(3-5), 757-769.

  28. Lancelot, E. (2010), Performance Based Contracts in the Road Sector: Towards Improved Efficiency in the Management of Maintenance and Rehabilitation - Brazil’s Experience.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  29. Manila, Philippines, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.22617/TIM179099-2 Bajari, P., Mcmillan, R. & Tadelis, S. (2009). Auctions Versus Negotiations in Procurement: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization. 25. 10.1093/jleo/ewn002.

  30. Milgrom, P. R., & Weber, R. J. (1982). A theory of auctions and competitive bidding.

  31. OECD (2016), Preventing Corruption in Public Procurement, Policy Brief Owens, D., Grossman, Z., & Fackler, R. (2014). The control premium: A preference for payoff autonomy. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6(4), 138-61.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  32. Paul, A., & Gutierrez, G. (2004). Mean sample spacings, sample size and variability in an auction-theoretic framework. Operations Research Letters, 32(2), 103-108.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Pérez, M., Sanromán, G. & Pereyra, A. (2020). Contratos por niveles de servicio: Mayor asignación presupuestal o mayor eficiencia?. Nota técnica del BID ;1797, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, D.C., USA Pier, E.L., Brauer, M., Filut, A., Kaatz, A., Raclaw, J., Nathan, M.J., Ford, C.E. & Carnes, M.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  34. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 2952–2957.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. Stankevich, N., Qureshi, N. & Queiroz, C. (2009). Performance-based Contracting for Preservation and Improvement of Road Assets. Transport Note No. TN-27, The World Bank, Washington, D.C., USA
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Transport Papers TP31, March, The World Bank Li, X. (2005). A note on expected rent in auction theory. Operations Research Letters, 33(5), 531-534.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Multiple Switching and Data Quality in the Multiple Price List. (2021). Zuo, Sharon Xuejing ; Zhang, Jane Y ; Yu, Chi Wai .
    In: The Review of Economics and Statistics.
    RePEc:tpr:restat:v:103:y:2021:i:1:p:136-150.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Imposing choice under ambiguity: the case of dynamic currency conversion. (2020). Ewerhart, Christian ; Li, Sheng.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:345.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Randomization and Ambiguity Aversion. (2020). Zhang, QI ; Ke, Shaowei.
    In: Econometrica.
    RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:88:y:2020:i:3:p:1159-1195.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Time Lotteries and Stochastic Impatience. (2020). Ortoleva, Pietro ; Dejarnette, Patrick ; Gottlieb, Daniel ; Dillenberger, David.
    In: Econometrica.
    RePEc:wly:emetrp:v:88:y:2020:i:2:p:619-656.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. An economist and a psychologist form a line: What can imperfect perception of length tell us about stochastic choice?. (2020). Smith, John ; Duffy, Sean.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:99417.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Reconsidering Risk Aversion. (2020). Kimball, Miles ; Benjamin, Daniel ; Fontana, Mark Alan.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:28007.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The acceptability of lotteries in allocation problems. (2020). Foucart, Renaud ; Bouacida, Elias.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:lan:wpaper:301646245.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Why do people prefer randomisation? An experimental investigation. (2020). Permana, Yudistira.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:88:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-019-09719-2.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Dual choice axiom and probabilistic choice. (2020). Blavatskyy, Pavlo R.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:61:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11166-020-09332-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. A Behavioral Characterization of the Drift Diffusion Model and Its Multialternative Extension for Choice Under Time Pressure. (2020). Marinacci, Massimo ; Maccheroni, Fabio ; Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone ; Baldassi, Carlo ; Pirazzini, Marco.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:66:y:2020:i:11:p:5075-5093.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Opinion dynamics via search engines (and other algorithmic gatekeepers). (2020). Sobbrio, Francesco ; Germano, Fabrizio.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:187:y:2020:i:c:s0047272720300529.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Preferences for power. (2020). Tergiman, Chloe ; Pikulina, Elena S.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:185:y:2020:i:c:s0047272720300372.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Randomization under ambiguity: Efficiency and incentive compatibility. (2020). Yannelis, Nicholas C ; Song, Xinxi ; Liu, Zhiwei.
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:90:y:2020:i:c:p:1-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Who’ll stop lying under oath? Empirical evidence from tax evasion games. (2020). Shogren, Jason ; Jacquemet, Nicolas ; Malezieux, A ; Luchini, S.
    In: European Economic Review.
    RePEc:eee:eecrev:v:124:y:2020:i:c:s0014292120300015.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Cognitive abilities and risk taking: the role of preferences. (2020). Lohse, Johannes ; Drouvelis, Michalis.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:bir:birmec:20-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Black-Box Strategies and Equilibrium for Games with Cumulative Prospect Theoretic Players. (2020). Anantharam, Venkat ; Phade, Soham R.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:2004.09592.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Strength of preference and decision making under risk. (2019). Garagnani, Michele ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:330.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Revealed statistical consumer theory. (2019). Dziewulski, Pawel ; Allen, Roy ; Rehbeck, John.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:sus:susewp:1119.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Judgments of length in the economics laboratory: Are there brains in choice?. (2019). Smith, John ; Gussman, Steven ; Duffy, Sean.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:93126.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Paying for Kidneys? A Randomized Survey and Choice Experiment. (2019). Macis, Mario ; Lacetera, Nicola ; Elias, Julio.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25581.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Why choice lists increase risk taking. (2019). Mayraz, Guy ; Freeman, David.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:22:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10683-018-9586-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. “Dice”-sion–Making Under Uncertainty: When Can a Random Decision Reduce Risk?. (2019). Wiesemann, Wolfram ; Kuhn, Daniel ; Delage, Erick.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:65:y:2019:i:7:p:3282-3301.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. The (Neural) Dynamics of Stochastic Choice. (2019). Webb, Ryan.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:65:y:2019:i:1:p:230-255.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Eliciting Choice Correspondences A General Method and an Experimental Implementation. (2019). Bouacida, Elias.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01998001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Eliciting Choice Correspondences A General Method and an Experimental Implementation. (2019). Bouacida, Elias .
    In: PSE Working Papers.
    RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-01998001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Revealed preferences under uncertainty: Incomplete preferences and preferences for randomization. (2019). Riedl, Arno ; Cettolin, Elena.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:181:y:2019:i:c:p:547-585.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Choice-theoretic foundations of the divisive normalization model. (2019). Glimcher, Paul ; Brandenburger, Adam ; Steverson, Kai .
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:164:y:2019:i:c:p:148-165.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Paying for Kidneys? A Randomized Survey and Choice Experiment. (2019). Macis, Mario ; Elias, Julio ; Lacetera, N.
    In: Working Paper CRENoS.
    RePEc:cns:cnscwp:201910.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Time will tell: recovering preferences when choices are noisy. (2018). Netzer, Nick ; Fehr, Ernst ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: ECON - Working Papers.
    RePEc:zur:econwp:306.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Flipping a coin: Evidence from university applications. (2018). Dwenger, Nadja ; Weizsacker, Georg ; Kubler, Dorothea.
    In: EconStor Open Access Articles.
    RePEc:zbw:espost:209666.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Smokers’ Rational Lexicographic Preferences for Cigarette Package Warnings: A Discrete Choice Experiment with Eye Tracking. (2018). Triunfo, Patricia ; Gerstenbluth, Mariana ; Harris, Jeffrey E.
    In: Documentos de Trabajo (working papers).
    RePEc:ude:wpaper:0218.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. The Economic Relevancy of Risk Preferences Elicited Online and With Low Stakes. (2018). Johnson, David ; Gibson, John.
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:87231.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Time Lotteries and Stochastic Impatience. (2018). Ortoleva, Pietro ; Gottlieb, Daniel ; Dillenberger, David ; Dejarnette, Patrick.
    In: PIER Working Paper Archive.
    RePEc:pen:papers:18-021.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences When Choices Are Noisy. (2018). Netzer, Nick ; Fehr, Ernst ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp11918.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Flipping a coin: Evidence from university applications. (2018). Dwenger, Nadja ; Weizsacker, Georg ; Kubler, Dorothea.
    In: Journal of Public Economics.
    RePEc:eee:pubeco:v:167:y:2018:i:c:p:240-250.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Fechner’s strong utility model for choice among n>2 alternatives: Risky lotteries, Savage acts, and intertemporal payoffs. (2018). Blavatskyy, Pavlo.
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:79:y:2018:i:c:p:75-82.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Response times in economics: Looking through the lens of sequential sampling models. (2018). Clithero, John A.
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:69:y:2018:i:c:p:61-86.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Random intertemporal choice. (2018). Lu, Jay ; Saito, Kota.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:177:y:2018:i:c:p:780-815.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Time Will Tell: Recovering Preferences when Choices Are Noisy. (2018). Netzer, Nick ; Fehr, Ernst ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Nick, Netzer ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7333.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Time will tell - Recovering Preferences when Choices are Noisy. (2018). Netzer, Nick ; Fehr, Ernst ; Alós-Ferrer, Carlos ; Alos-Ferrer, Carlos.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1811.02497.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Opinion Dynamics via Search Engines (and other Algorithmic Gatekeepers). (2018). Sobbrio, Francesco ; Germano, Fabrizio.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1810.06973.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. No Time to Think: Food Decision-Making under Time Pressure. (2018). Palma, Marco ; Huseynov, Samir ; Krajbich, Ian.
    In: 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea18:274135.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. On the Roots of the Intrinsic Value of Decision Rights: Evidence from France and Japan. (2017). Tarroux, Benoît ; Hanaki, Nobuyuki ; Ferreira, João.
    In: Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes 1 & University of Caen).
    RePEc:tut:cremwp:2017-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Aligning Democracy: A Comment on Bruno S. Frey’s “Proposals for a Democracy of the Future”. (2017). Kendall, Ryan.
    In: Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics.
    RePEc:spr:homoec:v:34:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s41412-017-0053-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Indifference or indecisiveness: a strict discrimination. (2017). Qiu, Jianying ; Ong, Qiyan .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:81790.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. Indifference or indecisiveness: a strict discrimination. (2017). Qiu, Jianying ; Ong, Qiyan .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:81440.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Deliberately Stochastic. (2017). Riella, Gil ; Ortoleva, Pietro ; Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone ; Dillenberger, David.
    In: PIER Working Paper Archive.
    RePEc:pen:papers:17-013.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. On the Roots of the Intrinsic Value of Decision Rights: Evidence from France and Japan. (2017). Tarroux, Benoît ; Hanaki, Nobuyuki ; Ferreira, João.
    In: GREDEG Working Papers.
    RePEc:gre:wpaper:2017-29.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Goal-based models for discrete choice analysis. (2017). Swait, Joffre.
    In: Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.
    RePEc:eee:transb:v:101:y:2017:i:c:p:72-88.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Breaking Bad: When Being Disadvantaged Incentivizes (Seemingly) Risky Behavior. (). Johnson, David ; Gibson, John.
    In: Eastern Economic Journal.
    RePEc:pal:easeco:v::y::i::d:10.1057_s41302-020-00172-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-03-08 07:58:35 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.