Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

create a website
Opting-In: Participation Biases in the Lab. (2012). Wang, Carmen ; Slonim, Robert ; Merrett, Danielle ; Garbarino, Ellen.
In: IZA Discussion Papers.
RePEc:iza:izadps:dp6865.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 34

Citations received by this document

Cites: 66

References cited by this document

Cocites: 33

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Laboratory experiments can pre-design to address power and selection issues. (2020). Ding, Weili.
    In: Journal of the Economic Science Association.
    RePEc:spr:jesaex:v:6:y:2020:i:2:d:10.1007_s40881-020-00089-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Does selection bias cause us to overestimate gender differences in competitiveness?. (2020). Stoop, Jan ; Nikiforakis, Nikos ; Dariel, Aurelie.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:nad:wpaper:20200046.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Self-selection bias in a field experiment: Recruiting subjects under different payment schemes. (2020). Herranz-Zarzoso, Noemi ; Sabater-Grande, Gerardo.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:jau:wpaper:2020/13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of). (2019). List, John ; Jimenezgomez, David ; Czibor, Eszter.
    In: Southern Economic Journal.
    RePEc:wly:soecon:v:86:y:2019:i:2:p:371-432.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Distributive Preferences of Public Representatives: A Field-in-the-Lab Experiment. (2019). Leprince, Matthieu ; Denant-Boemont, Laurent ; Pourieux, Matthieu.
    In: Economics Working Paper from Condorcet Center for political Economy at CREM-CNRS.
    RePEc:tut:cccrwp:2019-05-ccr.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Identifying discrete behavioural types: a re-analysis of public goods game contributions by hierarchical clustering. (2019). Turocy, Theodore ; Fallucchi, Francesco ; Luccasen, Andrew R.
    In: Journal of the Economic Science Association.
    RePEc:spr:jesaex:v:5:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s40881-018-0060-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of). (2019). List, John ; Jimenez-Gomez, David ; Czibor, Eszter.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:25451.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. On the External Validity of Social Preference Games: A Systematic Lab-Field Study. (2019). Navarro-Martinez, Daniel ; Galizzi, Matteo M.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:65:y:2019:i:3:p:976-1002.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of). (2019). List, John ; Jimenez-Gomez, David ; Czibor, Eszter.
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:00648.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. On the external validity of social preference games: a systematic lab-field study. (2019). Galizzi, Matteo ; Navarro-Martinez, Daniel.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:84088.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Norms in the lab: Inexperienced versus experienced participants. (2019). Sproten, Alec N ; Schwieren, Christiane ; Schmidt, Robert J.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0666.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Incentives and Gender in a Multitask Setting: an Experimental Study with Real-Effort Tasks. (2018). Murad, Zahra ; Cookson, Graham ; Stavropoulou, Charitini.
    In: Working Papers in Economics & Finance.
    RePEc:pbs:ecofin:2018-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Selection in the Lab: A Network Approach. (2018). Alexeev, Alexander ; Alekseev, Aleksandr ; Freer, Mikhail.
    In: Working Papers ECARES.
    RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/278180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Selection in the Lab: A Network Approach. (2018). Alexeev, Alexander ; Alekseev, Aleksandr ; Freer, Mikhail.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:chu:wpaper:18-13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Social Norm Perception in Economic Laboratory Experiments: Inexperienced versus Experienced Participants. (2018). Schwieren, Christiane ; Sproten, Alec N ; Schmidt, Robert J.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0656.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The limits of guilt. (2017). Balafoutas, Loukas ; Fornwagner, Helena.
    In: Journal of the Economic Science Association.
    RePEc:spr:jesaex:v:3:y:2017:i:2:d:10.1007_s40881-017-0043-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Experienced vs. inexperienced participants in the lab: do they behave differently?. (2017). Benndorf, Volker ; Normann, Hans-Theo ; Moellers, Claudia .
    In: Journal of the Economic Science Association.
    RePEc:spr:jesaex:v:3:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s40881-017-0036-z.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Risk Attitudes, Sample Selection and Attrition in a Longitudinal Field Experiment. (2017). Yoo, Hong Il ; Lau, Morten ; Harrison, Glenn.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:dur:durham:2017_07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Partner selection into policy relevant field experiments. (2016). Belot, Michèle ; James, Jonathan.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:123:y:2016:i:c:p:31-56.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Are we underestimating inequality aversion? Comparing recruited and classroom subjects. (2016). Kamas, Linda ; Preston, Anne.
    In: Economics Letters.
    RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:147:y:2016:i:c:p:157-159.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. On the external validity of social-preference games: A systematic lab-field study. (2015). Galizzi, Matteo ; Martinez, Daniel Navarro .
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:upf:upfgen:1462.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE. (2015). Greiner, Ben.
    In: Journal of the Economic Science Association.
    RePEc:spr:jesaex:v:1:y:2015:i:1:d:10.1007_s40881-015-0004-4.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Self-selection into laboratory experiments: pro-social motives versus monetary incentives. (2015). Nosenzo, Daniele ; Abeler, Johannes.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:18:y:2015:i:2:p:195-214.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Corporate Philanthropy and Productivity: Evidence from an Online Real Effort Experiment. (2015). Vlassopoulos, Michael ; Tonin, Mirco.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:61:y:2015:i:8:p:1795-1811.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. On the External Validity of Social Preference Games: A Systematic Lab-Field Study. (2015). Galizzi, Matteo ; Navarro-Martinez, Daniel.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:bge:wpaper:802.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Is avatar-to-avatar communication as effective as face-to-face communication? An Ultimatum Game experiment in First and Second Life. (2014). Roth, Alvin ; Greiner, Ben ; Caravella, Mary .
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:108:y:2014:i:c:p:374-382.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Corporate Philanthropy and Productivity: Evidence from an Online Real Effort Experiment. (2014). Vlassopoulos, Michael ; Tonin, Mirco.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4778.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Self-selection into Economics Experiments is Driven by Monetary Rewards. (2013). Nosenzo, Daniele ; Abeler, Johannes.
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:not:notcdx:2013-03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. On the Generalizability of Experimental Results in Economics: With A Response To Camerer. (2013). list, john ; Al-Ubaydli, Omar.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19666.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? The case of social and risk preferences. (2013). Slonim, Robert ; Nikiforakis, Nikos ; Cleave, Blair.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:16:y:2013:i:3:p:372-382.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Self-Selection into Economics Experiments Is Driven by Monetary Rewards. (2013). Nosenzo, Daniele ; Abeler, Johannes.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp7374.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. On the Generalizability of Experimental Results in Economics: With A Response To Camerer. (2013). list, john ; Al-Ubaydli, Omar.
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:j0001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. On the Generalizability of Experimental Results in Economics: With a Response to Commentors. (2013). list, john ; Al-Ubaydli, Omar.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4543.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. When will there be Gift Exchange? Addressing the Lab-Field Debate with Laboratory Gift Exchange Experiments. (2013). Kessler, Judd .
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4161.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Al-Ubaydli, O. and J. List (2012). On the generalizability of experimental results in economics, in Frechette, G. and A. Schotter (eds) The Methods of Modern Experiments, Oxford University Press.

  2. Alatas, V., L. Cameron, A. Chaudhuri, N. Erkal, and L. Gangadharan (2009). Subject pool effects in a corruption experiment: A comparison of Indonesian public servants and Indonesian students. Experimental Economics 12(1): 113-132.

  3. Andersen, Steffen, Glenn W. Harrison, Morten Igel Lau, and Elisabet RutstrÃm (2009). Preference Heterogeneity in Experiments: Comparing the Field and Laboratory, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, forthcoming.

  4. Anderson, Jon, Stephen V. Burks, Jeffrey Carpenter, Lorenz GÃtte, Karsten Maurer, Daniele Nosenzo, Ruth Potter, Kim Rocha and Aldo Rustichini (2010). Self Selection Does Not Increase OtherRegarding Preferences among Adult Laboratory Subjects, but Student Subjects May Be More SelfRegarding than Adults, IZA Discussion Paper No. 5389.

  5. Andreoni, James and Charles Sprenger (2010). Estimating Time Preferences from Convex Budgets, NBER Working Paper No. 16347 Baran, Nicole, Paola Sapienza, and Luigi Zingales (2010). Can We Infer Social Preferences from the Lab? Evidence from the Trust Game, CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP7634.

  6. Bellemare, Charles, and Sabine KrÃger (2007). On Representative Social Capital, European Economic Review, 51(1), 181-202.

  7. Bellemare, Charles, Sabine KrÃger and A. van Soest (2008), Measuring Inequity Aversion in a Heterogeneous Population using Experimental Decisions and Subjective Probabilities, Econometrica, 76(4), 815-839.

  8. Bellemare, Charles, Sabine KrÃger and A. van Soest (2011), Preferences, Intentions, and Expectations Violations: a Large-Scale Experiment with a Representative Subject Pool, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 78(3), 349-365.

  9. Belot, M., R. Duch, and L. Miller. (2010). Who Should be Called to the Lab? A comprehensive comparison of students and non-students in classic experimental games. Nuffield centre for experimental social sciences, University of Oxford, Discussion paper series Benz, Matthias and Stephan Meier (2008). Do people behave in experiments as in the field? Evidence from Donations, Experimental Economics, 11 (3), 268-281 Berg, Joyce, John Dickhaut and Kevin McCabe (1995). Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History, Games and Economic Behavior, 10(1) 122-142.

  10. Binswanger, Hans P. (1980). Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62, 395â407.

  11. Binswanger, Hans P. (1981). Attitudes toward risk: Theoretical Implications of an Experiment in Rural India. Economic Journal, 91, 867â890.

  12. Bolton, Gary E and Axel Ockenfels (2000). ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition. The American Economic Review, 90(1), 166-193.

  13. Bowles, Samuel, and Sandra Polania-Reyes (2011). Economic Incentives and Social Preferences: Substitutes or Complements?, Journal of Economic Literature, forthcoming.

  14. BraÃas-Garza, Pablo, Filippos Exadaktylos and Antonio EspÃn MartÃn (2011). Experimental subjects are not special. Working paper Burks, S., J. Carpenter, and L. Goette. (2009). Performance pay and worker cooperation: Evidence from an artefactual field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70:3, pp. 458-69.

  15. Camerer, Colin (2011). The Promise and Success of Lab-Field Generalizability in Experimental Economics: A Critical Reply to Levitt and List. Working paper Cameron, Lisa, Ananish Chaudhuri, Nisvan Erkal, and Lata Gangadharan (2009). Propersities to Engage in and Punish Corrupt Behavior: Experimental Evidence from Australia, India, Indonesia and Singapore, Journal of Public Economics, 93 (7-8), 843-851.

  16. Cardenas, J. (2011). Social Norms and Behavior in the Local Commons as Seen Through the Lens of Field Experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics, pp. 1-35.

  17. Cardenas, J. C. (2005). Groups, Commons and Regulations: Experiments with Villagers and Students in Colombia, in Psychology, Rationality and Economic Behaviour: Challenging Standard Assumptions. Agarwal and Vercelli eds: International Economics Association.

  18. Carpenter, Jeffrey, Cristina Connolly and Caitlin Myers (2008). Altruistic Behavior in a Representative Dictator Experiment, Experimental Economics, 11(3), 282-298.

  19. Carpenter, Jeffrey, Stephen Burks and Eric Verhoogen (2004). Comparing Students to Workers: The Effects of Social Framing on Behavior in Distribution Games, IZA Discussion Papers No. 1341 Casari, Marco, John Ham and John Kagel (2007). Selection bias, demographic effects and ability effects in common value auctions experiments, American Economic Review, 97 (4), 1278-1304.

  20. Cleave, Blair Llewellyn, Nikos Nikiforakis and Robert Slonim (2010). Is There Selection Bias in Laboratory Experiments?, Univ. of Melbourne Dept. of Economics Working Paper No. 1106 Cooper, David J., John Kagel, Wei Lo and Qing Liang Gu (1999). Gaming Against Managers in Incentive Systems: Experimental Results with Chinese Students and Chinese Managers, American Economic Review, 89 (4), 781-804.

  21. Dixon, P. N. (1978), âSubject recruitment incentives, personality factors, and attitudes towards experimentation in a simultaneous intentional-incidental learning taskâ, Journal of General Psychology 99, 99â105.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Eckel, Catherine, and Philip Grossman (1996). Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games, Games and Economic Behavior, 16, 181-191.

  23. Eckel, Catherine, and Philip Grossman (2000). Volunteers and Pseudo-Volunteers: The Effect of Recruitment Method in Dictator Experiments, Experimental Economics, 3, 107â120.

  24. Eckel, Catherine, and Philip Grossman (2008). Forecasting Risk Attitudes: An experimental Study Using Actual and Forecast Gamble Choices, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(1) 1-17.

  25. Falk, Armin, Stephan Meier and Christian Zehnder (2011). Did We Overestimate the Role of Social Preferences? The Case of Self-Selected Student Samples, Journal of the European Economic Association, forthcoming.

  26. Fehr, Ernst and John List (2004). The Hidden Costs and Rewards of Incentives â Trust and Trustworthiness among CEOs, Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 741-771.

  27. Fehr, Ernst and Klaus M. Schmidt (1999). A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), 817-868 Frederick, Shane (2005). Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4): 25â42.

  28. GÃth, Werner, Carsten Schmidt and Matthias Sutter (2007). Bargaining outside the lab â a newspaper experiment of a three-person ultimatum game. The Economic Journal, 117: 449â469.

  29. GÃth, Werner, Rolf Schmittberger and Bernd Schwarze (1982). The Robustness of Trust and Reciprocity Across a Heterogeneous Population, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 367-388.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Garbarino, Ellen and Robert Slonim (2009). The Robustness of Trust and Reciprocity Across a Heterogeneous Population, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 69(3), 226-40.

  31. Garbarino, Ellen, Robert Slonim and Justin Sydnor (2011), Digit Ratios (2D:4D) as Predictors of Risky Decision Making, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 42(1), 1-26.

  32. Greiner, Ben (2004). The Online Recruitment System ORSEE 2.0 - A Guide for the Organization of Experiments in Economics. University of Cologne, Working Paper Series in Economics 10.

  33. Grether, David M. and Charles R. Plott (1979). Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon, The American Economic Review 69(4) 623-638 Groves, Roberts M. (2006). Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 70, 646-675.

  34. Hannah, Lynn, John Kagel and Don Moser (2002). Partial Gift Exchange in an Experimental Labor Market: Impact of Subject Population Differences, Productivity Differences and Effort Requests on Behavior, Journal of Labor Economics, 20 (4), 923-951.

  35. Harbaugh, William T., Kate Krause, Steven G. Liday and Lise Vesterlund (2003). Trust in Children, in Trust, Reciprocity and Gains from Association edited by Elinor Ostrom and James Walker, Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Harrison, Glenn W. and John A. List (2004). Field Experiments, Journal of Economic Literature, 42(4) 1009-1055 Harrison, Glenn W., Morten Lau and Elisabet RutstrÃm (2009). Risk Attitudes, Randomization to Treatment, and Self-Selection Into Experiments, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 70, 498â507.

  37. Heckman, James (1979). Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error, Econometrica, 47 153â61.

  38. Henrich, J., S. Heine and A. Norenzayan (2010). Most People are not WEIRD. Nature, 446: 29.

  39. Henrich, Joseph, Robert Boyd, Sam Bowles, Colin Camerer, Herbert Gintis, Richard McElreath and Ernst Fehr (2001). In Search of Homo economicus: Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies, American Economic Review, 91(2) 73-79.

  40. Herrmann, Benedikt, Christian ThÃni and Simon GÃchter (2008). Antisocial Punishment Across Societies, Science, 319(5868), 1362-7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Hoffman, M. H. and J. Morgan (2011). Whos Naughty? Whos Nice? Social Preferences in Online Industries. Working paper.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  42. Holt, C. (2006). Markets, Games, and Strategic Behavior: Recipes for Interactive Learning. AddisonWesley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Holt, Charles A. and Susan K. Laury (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects, The American Economic Review, 92(5) 1644-1655 Horton, John, David Rand and Richard Zeckhauser (2011), The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market, Experimental Economics, forthcoming.

  44. Jackson, J. M., Procidano, M. E. & Cohen, C. J. (1989), âSubject pool sign-up procedures: a threat to external validityâ, Social Behavior and Personality 17, 29â43.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Jung, J. (1969). Current practices and problems in the use of college students for psychological research, The Canadian Psychologist 10, 280â290.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Kagel, J., R. Battalio, and J. Walker (1979). Volunteer Artifacts in Experiments in Economics: Specification of the Problem and Some Initial Data from a Small Scale Field Experiment, Research in Experimental Economics, 1.

  47. Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk, Econometrica 47(2) 263-292 Krawczyk, Michael (2011). What brings subjects to the lab? Experimental Economics, 14(4), 482-489.

  48. Levitt, Steven D., and John A. List (2007a). What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 153-174.

  49. Levitt, Steven D., and John A. List (2007b). Viewpoint: On the Generalizability of Lab Behaviour to the Field, Canadian Journal of Economics, 40(2), 347-370.

  50. List, J. 2004. Young, Selfish, and Male: Field evidence on social preferences. Economic Journal, 114, pp. 121-49.

  51. List, John (2006), The Behavioralist Meets the Market: Measuring Social Preferences and Reputation Effects in Actual Transactions, Journal of Political Economy, 114(1), 1-37.

  52. Machina, Mark J. (1987). Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved, The Journal of Economic Perspectives 1(1) 121-154 McKelvey, Richard D. and Thomas R. Palfrey (1992). An Experimental Study of the Centipede Game, Econometrica 60(4) 803-836 Miller, L. E., & Smith, K. L. (1983). Handling Nonresponse Issues. Journal of Extension, 21(5), 4550.

  53. Nagel, Rosemarie (1995). Unraveling in Guessing Games: An Experimental Study, The American Economic Review 85(5) 1313-1326 Orne, Martin (1962). On the Social Psychological Experiment: With Particular Reference to Demand Characteristics and Their Implications, American Psychologist, 17(10), 776-83.

  54. Remoundou, Kyriaki, Andreas Drichoutis and Phoeben Koundouri (2010). Warm glow in charitable auctions: Are the WEIRDos driving the results? MPRA Paper No. 25553 Roe, Brian E., Timothy C. Haab, David Q. Beversdorf, Howard H. Gu, Michael R. Tilley (2009).

  55. Risk-attitude selection bias in subject pools for experiments involving neuroimaging and blood samples. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 181â189 Rosen, Ephraim (1951). Differences between Volunteers and Non-Volunteers for Psychological Studies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, 185-193.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  56. Rosenthal, Robert, and Ralph Rosnow (1969). Artifacts in Behavioral Research, Oxford University Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Rosenthal, Robert, and Ralph Rosnow (1973). The Volunteer Subject, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Roth, Alvin E., Vesna Prasnikar, Masahiro Okuno-Fujiwara and Shmuel Zamir (1991). Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubiljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study, American Economic Review, 81, 1068-1095.

  59. Rush, M. C., Phillips, J. S. & Panek, P. E. (1978). Subject recruitmemt bias: The paid volunteer subject, Perceptual and Motor Skills 47, 443â449.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  60. Saunders, D. M., Fisher, W. A., Hewitt, E. C. & Clayton, J. P. (1985). A Method For Empirically Assessing Volunteer Selection Effects: Recruitment Procedures and Responses to Erotica, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49, 1703â1712.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Senn, C. Y. & Desmarais, S. (2001). Are Our Recruitment Practices for Sex Studies Working Across Gender? The Effect of Topic and Gender of Recruiter on Participation Rates of University Men and Women, Journal of Sex Research 38, 111â117.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Silverman, I. & Margulis, S. (1973). Experiment tilte as a source of sampling bias in commonly used âsubject poolâ procedures, The Canadian Psychologist 14, 197â201.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  63. Slonim, Robert and Ellen Garbarino (2006). Increases in trust and altruism from partner selection: experimental evidence, Experimental Economics, 11(2), 134-153.

  64. Stahl, Dale (1996). Boundedly Rational Rule Learning in a Guessing Game, Games and Economic Behavior, 16, 303-330.

  65. Strotz, R. H. (1955). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization, Review of Economic Studies 23(3), 165-80.

  66. Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty, Journal of Risk and uncertainty 5(4) 297-323 Wagner, M. E. & Schubert, D. S. P. (1976). Increasing volunteer representativeness by recruiting for credit or pay, The Journal of General Psychology 94, 85â91.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Non est Disputandum de Generalizability? A Glimpse into The External Validity Trial. (2020). List, John.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27535.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. On the external validity of social preference games: a systematic lab-field study. (2019). Galizzi, Matteo ; Navarro-Martinez, Daniel.
    In: LSE Research Online Documents on Economics.
    RePEc:ehl:lserod:84088.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Hidden Persuaders: Do Small Gifts Lubricate Business Negotiations?. (2018). Thöni, Christian ; Maréchal, Michel ; Thoni, Christian ; Marechal, Michel Andre.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7070.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. The Role of Sales Agents in Information Disclosure: Evidence from a Field Experiment. (2017). Sweeney, Richard ; Allcott, Hunt.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:63:y:2017:i:1:p:21-39.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. The Role of Communication of Performance Schemes: Evidence from a Field Experiment. (2017). Sunde, Uwe ; Roider, Andreas ; Englmaier, Florian.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:63:y:2017:i:12:p:4061-4080.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Learning to Manage and Managing to Learn: The Effects of Student Leadership Service. (2017). Lu, Fangwen ; Anderson, Michael L.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:63:y:2017:i:10:p:3246-3261.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. What do people ‘learn by looking’ at direct feedback on their energy consumption? Results of a field study in Southern France. (2017). Lazaric, Nathalie ; Marechal, Kevin ; Kendel, Adnane.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01630972.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. What Do People Learn By Looking at Direct Feedback on their Energy Consumption? Results of a Field Study in Southern France. (2017). Maréchal, Kevin ; Lazaric, Nathalie ; Marechal, Kevin ; Kendel, Adnane.
    In: GREDEG Working Papers.
    RePEc:gre:wpaper:2017-19.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Scaling for economists: lessons from the non-adherence problem in the medical literature. (2017). List, John ; Suskind, Dana ; Lore, Danielle ; Al-Ubaydli, Omar.
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:00616.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. What do people ‘learn by looking’ at direct feedback on their energy consumption? Results of a field study in Southern France. (2017). Lazaric, Nathalie ; Marechal, Kevin ; Kendel, Adnane.
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:108:y:2017:i:c:p:593-605.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Scaling for Economists: Lessons from the Non-Adherence Problem in the Medical Literature. (2017). list, john ; Suskind, Dana ; Lore, Danielle ; Al-Ubaydli, Omar.
    In: Journal of Economic Perspectives.
    RePEc:aea:jecper:v:31:y:2017:i:4:p:125-44.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Can Myopic Loss Aversion Explain the Equity Premium Puzzle? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment with Professional Traders. (2016). Metcalfe, Robert ; list, john ; Larson, Francis .
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:22605.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Can Myopic Loss Aversion Explain the Equity Premium Puzzle? Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment with Professional Traders. (2016). Metcalfe, Robert ; list, john ; Larson, Francis .
    In: Natural Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:natura:00534.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The Effect of Discretion on Procurement Performance. (2016). Spagnolo, Giancarlo ; Coviello, Decio ; Guglielmo, Andrea.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:11286.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. The Effect of Discretion on Procurement Performance. (2016). Spagnolo, Giancarlo ; Coviello, Decio ; Guglielmo, Andrea.
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp1427.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The Effect of Discretion on Procurement Performance. (2015). Spagnolo, Giancarlo ; Coviello, Decio ; Guglielmo, Andrea.
    In: CEIS Research Paper.
    RePEc:rtv:ceisrp:361.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Do Natural Field Experiments Afford Researchers More or Less Control than Laboratory Experiments? A Simple Model. (2015). list, john ; Al-Ubaydli, Omar.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:20877.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Do Natural Field Experiments Afford Researchers More or Less Control than Laboratory Experiments? A Simple Model. (2015). list, john ; Al-Ubaydli, Omar.
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:00458.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The Effect of Discretion on Procurement Performance. (2015). Spagnolo, Giancarlo ; Coviello, Decio ; Guglielmo, Andrea.
    In: EIEF Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:eie:wpaper:1510.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. What do we learn from public good games about voluntary climate action? Evidence from an artefactual field experiment. (2015). Lohse, Johannes ; Goeschl, Timo ; Kettner, Sara Elisa ; Schwieren, Christiane.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0595.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Car Mechanics in the Lab - Investigating the Behavior of Real Experts on Experimental Markets for Credence Goods. (2014). Sutter, Matthias ; Kerschbamer, Rudolf ; Beck, Adrian ; Qiu, Jianying .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2014-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Car mechanics in the lab: investigating the behavior of real experts on experimental markets for credence goods. (2014). Sutter, Matthias ; Kerschbamer, Rudolf ; Beck, Adrian ; Qiu, Jianying .
    In: Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:eui:euiwps:eco2014/02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. On the Generalizability of Experimental Results in Economics: With A Response To Camerer. (2013). list, john ; Al-Ubaydli, Omar.
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19666.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Can Indifference Make the World Greener?. (2013). Ekström, Mathias ; Egebark, Johan ; Ekstrom, Mathias.
    In: Research Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:sunrpe:2013_0012.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Can Indifference Make the World Greener?. (2013). Ekström, Mathias ; Egebark, Johan ; Ekstrom, Mathias.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:iuiwop:0975.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. On the Generalizability of Experimental Results in Economics: With A Response To Camerer. (2013). list, john ; Al-Ubaydli, Omar.
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:j0001.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Using field experiments to change the template of how we teach economics.. (2013). list, john.
    In: Artefactual Field Experiments.
    RePEc:feb:artefa:00389.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Opting-in: Participation bias in economic experiments. (2013). Wang, Carmen ; Slonim, Robert ; Garbarino, Ellen ; Merrett, Danielle .
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:90:y:2013:i:c:p:43-70.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. On the Generalizability of Experimental Results in Economics: With a Response to Commentors. (2013). list, john ; Al-Ubaydli, Omar.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4543.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. When will there be Gift Exchange? Addressing the Lab-Field Debate with Laboratory Gift Exchange Experiments. (2013). Kessler, Judd .
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_4161.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Identifying Confirmatory Bias in the Field: Evidence from a Poll of Experts. (2012). Logan, Trevon ; Sinkey, Michael J. ; Andrews, Rodney J..
    In: NBER Working Papers.
    RePEc:nbr:nberwo:18064.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Opting-In: Participation Biases in the Lab. (2012). Wang, Carmen ; Slonim, Robert ; Merrett, Danielle ; Garbarino, Ellen.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp6865.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Do Option-like Incentives Induce Overvaluation? Evidence from Experimental Asset Markets. (2012). Kirchler, Michael ; Holmen, Martin ; Kleinlercher, Daniel.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:hhs:gunwpe:0540.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-12-29 11:11:05 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.