Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

create a website
Overexertion of Effort under Working Time Autonomy and Feedback Provision. (2023). Shvartsman, Elena ; Dohmen, Thomas.
In: IZA Discussion Papers.
RePEc:iza:izadps:dp16028.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 0

Citations received by this document

Cites: 58

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

    This document has not been cited yet.

References

References cited by this document

  1. Abdellaoui, M., Baillon, A., Placido, L., and Wakker, P. P. (2011). The rich domain of uncertainty: Source functions and their experimental implementation. American Economic Review, 101(2):695–723.

  2. Akerlof, G. A. (1982). Labor contracts as partial gift exchange. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97(4):543–569.

  3. Avgoustaki, A. and Bessa, I. (2019). Examining the link between flexible working arrangement bundles and employee work effort. Human Resource Management, 58(4):431–449.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Avgoustaki, A. and Frankort, H. T. W. (2019). Implications of work effort and discretion for employee well-being and career-related outcomes: An integrative assessment. ILR Review, 72(3):636–661.

  5. Azmat, G. and Iriberri, N. (2016). The provision of relative performance feedback: An analysis of performance and satisfaction. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 25(1):77–110.

  6. Azmat, G., Bagues, M., Cabrales, A., and Iriberri, N. (2019). What you don’t know. . . can’t hurt you? a natural field experiment on relative performance feedback in higher education. Management Science, 65(8):3714–3736.

  7. Beckmann, M., Cornelissen, T., and Kräkel, M. (2017). Self-managed working time and employee effort: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 133:285– 302.

  8. Bell, L. A. and Freeman, R. B. (2001). The incentive for working hard: explaining hours worked differences in the us and germany. Labour Economics, 8(2):181–202.

  9. Blanes i Vidal, J. and Nossol, M. (2011). Tournaments without prizes: Evidence from personnel records. Management science, 57(10):1721–1736.

  10. Bock, O., Baetge, I., and Nicklisch, A. (2014). hroot: Hamburg registration and organization online tool. European Economic Review, 71:117–120.

  11. Carpenter, J., Matthews, P. H., and Schirm, J. (2010). Tournaments and office politics: Evidence from a real effort experiment. American Economic Review, 100(1):504–517.

  12. Charness, G. and Villeval, M.-C. (2009). Cooperation and competition in intergenerational experiments in the field and the laboratory. American Economic Review, 99(3):956–978.

  13. Corgnet, B. and Hernán-González, R. (2019). Revisiting the trade-off between risk and incentives: The shocking effect of random shocks? Management Science, 65(3):1096–1114.

  14. Corgnet, B., Hernán-González, R., and Schniter, E. (2015). Why real leisure really matters: Incentive effects on real effort in the laboratory. Experimental Economics, 18(2):284–301.

  15. Costa, P. T. and McCrae, R. R. (1985). The neo personality inventory: Manual, form s and form r. Psychological Assessment Resources.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  16. DellaVigna, S. and Pope, D. (2018). What motivates effort? evidence and expert forecasts. The Review of Economic Studies, 85(2):1029–1069.

  17. Dohmen, T. and Falk, A. (2011). Performance pay and multidimensional sorting: Productivity, preferences, and gender. American Economic Review, 101(2):556–90.

  18. Dohmen, T. and Shvartsman, E. (2022). Stress, incentives, and autonomy. Mimeo, University of Bonn.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., and Sunde, U. (2008). Representative trust and reciprocity: Prevalence and determinants. Economic Inquiry, 46(1):84–90.

  20. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., and Sunde, U. (2009). Homo reciprocans: Survey evidence on behavioural outcomes. The Economic Journal, 119(536):592–612.

  21. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., and Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3):522–550.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., and Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3):522–550.

  23. Dohmen, T., Rohde, I., and Stolp, T. (2022). Tournament incentives affect perceived stress and hormonal stress responses. Mimeo, University of Bonn.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Dohmen, T., Rohde, I., and Stolp, T. (2022). Tournament incentives affect perceived stress and hormonal stress responses. Mimeo, University of Bonn.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Drouvelis, M. and Paiardini, P. (2021). Feedback quality and performance in organisations. The Leadership Quarterly. in press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Eeckhoudt, L., Huang, R. J., and Tzeng, L. Y. (2012). Precautionary effort: a new look. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 79(2):585–590.

  27. Eriksson, T., Poulsen, A., and Villeval, M. C. (2009). Feedback and incentives: Experimental evidence. Labour Economics, 16(6):679–688.

  28. Erkal, N., Gangadharan, L., and Nikiforakis, N. (2011). Relative earnings and giving in a real-effort experiment. American Economic Review, 101(7):3330–3348.

  29. EWCS (2016). How are your working time arrangements set? (working time) visualisation : European bar chart by : Age, all - european working conditions survey - data visualisation ewcs 2016. link.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  30. Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Huffman, D. B., and Sunde, U. (2016). The preference survey module: A validated instrument for measuring risk, time, and social preferences. Discussion Paper 9674, IZA.

  31. Fehr, E. and Goette, L. (2007). Do workers work more if wages are high? evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Economic Review, 97(1):298–317.

  32. Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K. M. (2006). The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism – experimental evidence and new theories. Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, pages 615–691.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. Fehr, E. and Schmidt, K. M. (2006). The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism – experimental evidence and new theories. Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity, pages 615–691.

  34. Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2):171–178.

  35. Fliessbach, K., Weber, B., Trautner, P., Dohmen, T., Sunde, U., Elger, C. E., and Falk, A. (2007). Social comparison affects reward-related brain activity in the human ventral striatum.

  36. Gaab, J., Rohleder, N., Nater, U. M., and Ehlert, U. (2005). Psychological determinants of the cortisol stress response: The role of anticipatory cognitive appraisal. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30(6):599–610.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  37. Gaab, J., Rohleder, N., Nater, U. M., and Ehlert, U. (2005). Psychological determinants of the cortisol stress response: The role of anticipatory cognitive appraisal. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 30(6):599–610.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Gerlitz, J.-Y. and Schupp, J. (2005). Zur erhebung der big-five-basierten persoenlichkeitsmerkmale im soep. Research Notes 4, DIW Berlin.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Gibbs, M. (2017). How is new technology changing job design? IZA World of Labor.

  40. Gill, D. and Prowse, V. (2012). A structural analysis of disappointment aversion in a real effort competition. American Economic Review, 102(1):469–503.

  41. Goerg, S. J., Kube, S., and Radbruch, J. (2019). The effectiveness of incentive schemes in the presence of implicit effort costs. Management Science, 65(9):4063–4078.

  42. Kelly, E. L. and Moen, P. (2007). Rethinking the clockwork of work: Why schedule control may pay off at work and at home. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 9(4):487–506.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  43. Kuhn, P. and Villeval, M. C. (2015). Are women more attracted to co-operation than men? The Economic Journal, 125(582):115–140.

  44. Lang, F. R., John, D., Lüdtke, O., Schupp, J., and Wagner, G. G. (2011). Short assessment of the big five: Robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing. Behavior Research Methods, 43(2):548–567.

  45. Lott, Y. (2014). Working time autonomy and time adequacy. what if performance is all that counts? Discussion Paper 188, Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI).

  46. Mas, A. and Pallais, A. (2017). Valuing alternative work arrangements. American Economic Review, 107(12):3722–59.

  47. Nijp, H. H., Beckers, D. G. J., Geurts, S. A. E., Tucker, P., and Kompier, M. A. J. (2012). Systematic review on the association between employee worktime control and work-non-work balance, health and well-being, and job-related outcomes. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 38(4):299–313.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  48. Nolte, H., Weischer, C., Wilkesmann, U., Maetzel, J., and Tegethoff, H. G. (1997). Kontrolleinstellungen zum Leben und zur Zukunft: Auswertung eines neuen sozialpsychologischen Itemblocks im sozio-ökonomischen Panel. Fak. für Sozialwiss., Ruhr-Univ.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  49. Perugini, M., Gallucci, M., Presaghi, F., and Ercolani, A. P. (2003). The personal norm of reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 17(4):251–283.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Perugini, M., Gallucci, M., Presaghi, F., and Ercolani, A. P. (2003). The personal norm of reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 17(4):251–283. LXXXI
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Prendergast, C. (2002). The tenuous trade-off between risk and incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 110(5):1071–1102.

  52. Richter, D., Metzing, M., Weinhardt, M., and Schupp, J. (2013). Soep scales manual. SOEP Survey Papers 138, DIW Berlin.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  53. Robins, R. W., Hendin, H. M., and Trzesniewski, K. H. (2001). Measuring global self-esteem: Construct validation of a single-item measure and the rosenberg self-esteem scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(2):151–161.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  54. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 80(1):1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1):99–118.

  56. Simon, H. A. (1972). Theories of bounded rationality. In McGuire, C. B. and Radner, R., editors, Decision and Organization, pages 161–176. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Sloof, R. and Van Praag, C. M. (2010). The effect of noise in a performance measure on work motivation: A real effort laboratory experiment. Labour Economics, 17(5):751–765.

  58. Vischer, T., Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Schupp, J., Sunde, U., and Wagner, G. G. (2013). Validating an ultra-short survey measure of patience. Economics Letters, 120(2):142– 145.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Incoherent Preferences. (2021). Charles-Cadogan, G.
    In: CRETA Online Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:wrk:wcreta:69.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Characterizing ambiguity attitudes using model uncertainty. (2020). Bosetti, Valentina ; Berger, Loïc.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03031502.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Contracting Probability Distortions. (2019). Gonzalez-Jimenez, Victor H.
    In: Vienna Economics Papers.
    RePEc:vie:viennp:1901.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Social Status and Risk-Taking in Investment Decisions. (2019). Weitzel, Utz ; Rosenkranz, Stephanie ; Kirchler, Michael ; Lindner, Florian.
    In: Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2019_07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Risk preferences and development revisited. (2019). Vieider, Ferdinand ; Martinsson, Peter ; Nam, Pham Khanh ; Truong, Nghi .
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:86:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11238-018-9674-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Measuring ambiguity preferences: A new ambiguity preference survey module. (2019). Schröder, David ; Schroder, David ; Cavatorta, Elisa.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:58:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11166-019-09299-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Trust as a decision under ambiguity. (2019). Wakker, Peter ; Turmunkh, Uyanga ; Li, Chen.
    In: Experimental Economics.
    RePEc:kap:expeco:v:22:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s10683-018-9582-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Social Status and Risk-Taking in Investment Decisions. (2019). Weitzel, Utz ; Rosenkranz, Stephanie ; Kirchler, Michael ; Lindner, Florian.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2019-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Measuring multivariate risk preferences in the health domain. (2019). Attema, Arthur ; van De, Gijs ; Lharidon, Olivier.
    In: Journal of Health Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jhecon:v:64:y:2019:i:c:p:15-24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Testing constant absolute and relative ambiguity aversion. (2019). Placido, Latitia ; Baillon, Aurelien.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:181:y:2019:i:c:p:309-332.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Ambiguous persuasion. (2019). Beauchene, Dorian ; Li, Ming.
    In: Journal of Economic Theory.
    RePEc:eee:jetheo:v:179:y:2019:i:c:p:312-365.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Measuring time and risk preferences in an integrated framework. (2019). Vieider, Ferdinand M ; Panin, Amma ; Kemel, Emmanuel ; Abdellaoui, Mohammed.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:115:y:2019:i:c:p:459-469.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Elicitation of ambiguous beliefs with mixing bets. (2019). Schmidt, Patrick.
    In: Papers.
    RePEc:arx:papers:1902.07447.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. The Missing Link: Unifying Risk Taking and Time Discounting. (2018). Epper, Thomas ; Fehr-Duda, Helga.
    In: Economics Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:usg:econwp:2018:12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Delegated Decision Making and Social Competition in the Finance Industry. (2018). Weitzel, Utz ; Lindner, Florian ; Kirchler, Michael.
    In: Discussion Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.
    RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2018_08.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The strength of sensitivity to ambiguity. (2018). Mukerji, Sujoy ; Kuilen, Gijs ; Cubitt, Robin.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:85:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11238-018-9657-9.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. The role of information search and its influence on risk preferences. (2018). Kopsacheilis, Orestis.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:84:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11238-017-9623-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Delegated decision making and social competition in the finance industry. (2018). Weitzel, Utz ; Lindner, Florian ; Kirchler, Michael.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2018-07.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Rankings and Risk-Taking in the Finance Industry. (2018). Weitzel, Utz ; Lindner, Florian ; Kirchler, Michael.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2016-02.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Sources of Uncertainty and Subjective Prices. (2018). Minardi, Stefania ; Cerreia-Vioglio, Simone ; Battigalli, Pierpaolo ; Marinacci, M ; Maccheroni, F ; Cappelli, V.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:igi:igierp:628.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Three layers of uncertainty: an experiment. (2018). Bosetti, Valentina ; Berger, Loïc ; Liu, Ning ; Aydogan, Ilke.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:igi:igierp:623.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Three Layers of Uncertainty: an Experiment. (2018). Bosetti, Valentina ; Liu, Ning ; Berger, Loc ; Aydogan, Ilke.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:fem:femwpa:2018.24.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Probability interference in expected utility theory. (2018). Charles-Cadogan, G.
    In: Journal of Mathematical Economics.
    RePEc:eee:mateco:v:78:y:2018:i:c:p:163-175.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Asset pricing and ambiguity: Empirical evidence⁎. (2018). Brenner, Menachem ; Izhakian, Yehuda.
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:130:y:2018:i:3:p:503-531.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Expectation formation in an evolving game of uncertainty: New experimental evidence. (2018). Frijters, Paul ; Torgler, Benno ; Schaffner, Markus ; Foster, Gigi.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:154:y:2018:i:c:p:379-405.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Accounting for ambiguity and trust in partial outsourcing: A behavioral real options perspective. (2018). Gao, Yongling ; Driouchi, Tarik.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:92:y:2018:i:c:p:93-104.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Do sellers exploit biased beliefs of buyers? An experiment. (2018). Wenner, Lukas M.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:110:y:2018:i:c:p:194-215.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Contracting under uncertainty: A principal–agent model with ambiguity averse parties. (2018). Quiggin, John ; Kline, Jude J ; Grant, Simon.
    In: Games and Economic Behavior.
    RePEc:eee:gamebe:v:109:y:2018:i:c:p:582-597.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Quantum Decision Theory and the Ellsberg Paradox. (2018). Dhami, Sanjit ; Wei, Mengxing ; Al-Nowaihi, Ali.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_7158.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. ASSIMILATION IN THE RISK PREFERENCES OF SPOUSES. (2018). di Falco, Salvatore ; Vieider, Ferdinand M ; Difalco, Salvatore.
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:56:y:2018:i:3:p:1809-1816.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Allais, Ellsberg, and preferences for hedging. (2017). Ortoleva, Pietro ; Dean, Mark.
    In: Theoretical Economics.
    RePEc:the:publsh:1960.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Uncertainty Aversion in Game Theory: Experimental Evidence. (2017). Calford, Evan.
    In: Purdue University Economics Working Papers.
    RePEc:pur:prukra:1291.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. Learning-by-doing in an ambiguous environment. (2017). Laszlo, Sonia ; Engle-Warnick, Jim.
    In: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.
    RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:55:y:2017:i:1:d:10.1007_s11166-017-9264-0.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Signaling Probabilities in Ambiguity: on the impact of vague news. (2017). Vinogradov, Dmitri ; Makhlouf, Yousef.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:gla:glaewp:2017_12.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. To mitigate or not to mitigate: The price elasticity of pro-environmental behavior. (2017). Goeschl, Timo ; Diederich, Johannes.
    In: Journal of Environmental Economics and Management.
    RePEc:eee:jeeman:v:84:y:2017:i:c:p:209-222.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Ambiguous Correlation. (2017). Halevy, Yoram ; Epstein, Larry.
    In: Boston University - Department of Economics - Working Papers Series.
    RePEc:bos:wpaper:wp2017-006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. The Rich Domain of Ambiguity Explored. (2016). Wakker, Peter ; Müller, Julia ; Wang, Tong V ; Li, Zhihua ; Muller, Julia.
    In: Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc16:145734.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Ambiguity Attitudes in a Large Representative Sample. (2016). Wakker, Peter ; Kouwenberg, Roy ; Dimmock, Stephen.
    In: Management Science.
    RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:62:y:2016:i:5:p:1363-1380.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. RISK TAKING FOR ONESELF AND OTHERS: A STRUCTURAL MODEL APPROACH. (2016). Martinsson, Peter ; Villegas-Palacio, Clara ; Vieider, Ferdinand M ; Mejia, Milagros .
    In: Economic Inquiry.
    RePEc:bla:ecinqu:v:54:y:2016:i:2:p:879-894.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. PROBABILISTIC SOPHISTICATION, SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY, AND COGNITIVE ABILITY: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE. (2016). Almeida, Sergio ; Rangel, Marcos .
    In: Anais do XLII Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 42nd Brazilian Economics Meeting].
    RePEc:anp:en2014:131.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. Piecewise Additivity for Nonexpected Utility. (2015). Webb, Craig.
    In: The School of Economics Discussion Paper Series.
    RePEc:man:sespap:1503.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. Purely subjective extended Bayesian models with Knightian unambiguity. (2015). Qu, Xiangyu.
    In: Theory and Decision.
    RePEc:kap:theord:v:79:y:2015:i:4:p:547-571.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Measuring Ambiguity Preferences. (2014). Schroder, David ; Cavatorta, Elisa .
    In: Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy.
    RePEc:zbw:vfsc14:100593.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. Multiple-item risk measures. (2014). Sakha, Sahra ; Menkhoff, Lukas.
    In: Kiel Working Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:ifwkwp:1980.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Behavioral determinants of home bias - theory and experiment. (2014). Dlugosch, Dennis ; Wang, Mei ; Horn, Kristian .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:inn:wpaper:2014-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. A Test of Mechanical Ambiguity. (2014). Oechssler, Jörg ; Roomets, Alex .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:awi:wpaper:0555.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Ambiguity Aversion with Three or More Outcomes. (2014). Machina, Mark.
    In: American Economic Review.
    RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:104:y:2014:i:12:p:3814-40.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. Risk preferences and development revisited: A field experiment in Vietnam. (2013). Martinsson, Peter ; Vieider, Ferdinand M. ; Nam, Pham Khanh ; Truong, Nghi .
    In: Discussion Papers, WZB Junior Research Group Risk and Development.
    RePEc:zbw:wzbrad:spii2013403.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Risk Aversion and Religion. (2012). Vellekoop, Nathanaël ; Trautmann, Stefan ; Noussair, Charles ; Kuilen, Gijs ; van de Kuilen, G..
    In: Discussion Paper.
    RePEc:tiu:tiucen:b611b08c-0053-41df-82aa-c3724036c8ae.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2024-11-28 08:45:01 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.