Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
The Origin of Proactive Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility (ECSR) of Large Firms: Institutional Embeddedness—Driven, Family Involvement-Promoted, or Resource-Dependent?. (2021). Wang, Xiaohong ; Hu, Shilei.
In: Sustainability.
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1197-:d:485971.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 3

Citations received by this document

Cites: 123

References cited by this document

Cocites: 20

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. How Family Character Affect the Financing of Environmental Protection Strategies and Energy-Saving Measures. (2023). Benito-Hernandez, Sonia ; Priede-Bergamini, Tiziana ; Lopez-Cozar, Cristina.
    In: The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal.
    RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:25:y:2023:i:63:p:503.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Activities in Heating Industry—Case Study. (2021). Olkiewicz, Marcin ; Wyszomirski, Adam ; Wolniak, Radosaw.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:7:p:1930-:d:527469.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Effects of Pro-Ecological Investments on an Example of the Heating Industry—Case Study. (2021). Wolniak, Radosaw ; Olkiewicz, Anna ; Wyszomirski, Adam.
    In: Energies.
    RePEc:gam:jeners:v:14:y:2021:i:18:p:5959-:d:639279.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. ACFIC Released Its First Research Report on Social Responsibility of Chinese Private Enterprises. 2014. ACFIC Released Blue Book on Chinese Private Sector’s Performance of Fulfilling Social Responsibility.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  2. Amaeshi K. Exploring the Institutional Embeddedness of Corporate Stakeholding and Social Responsibility: A Comparative Political Economy Perspective. Ph.D. Thesis; University of Warwick: Coventry, UK, 2007.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  3. An W.; Rüling C.C.; Zheng X.; Zhang J. Configurations of effectuation, causation, and bricolage: Implications for firm growth paths. Small Bus. Econ. 2020, 54, 843-864.

  4. Anderson R.C.; Reeb D.M. Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. J. Financ. 2003, 58, 1301-1328.

  5. Babiak K.; Trendafilova S. CSR and environmental responsibility: Motives and pressures to adopt green management practices. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2011, 18, 11-24.

  6. Backes-Gellner U.; Kluike M.; Pull K.; Schneider M.R.; Teuber S. Human resource management and radical innovation: A fuzzy-set QCA of US multinationals in Germany, Switzerland, and the UK. J. Bus. Econ. 2016, 86, 751-772.

  7. Bammens Y.; Hünermund P. Nonfinancial considerations in eco-innovation decisions: The role of family ownership and reputation concerns. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2020, 37, 431-453.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Baum J.A.; Oliver C. Institutional embeddedness and the dynamics of organizational populations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1992, 57, 540-559.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  9. Bennett R.J. The logic of membership of sectoral business associations. Rev. Soc. Econ. 2000, 58, 17-42.

  10. Berrone P.; Cruz C.; Gomez-Mejia L.R. Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Fam. Bus. Rev. 2012, 25, 258-279.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  11. Berrone P.; Cruz C.; Gomez-Mejia L.R.; Larraza-Kintana M. Socioemotional wealth and corporate responses to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less?. Adm. Sci. Q. 2010, 55, 82-113.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  12. Bu X.; Dang W.V.; Wang J.; Liu Q. Environmental orientation, green supply chain management, and firm Performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese small and medium-sized enterprises. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  13. Campbell J.L. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007, 32, 946-967.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Campopiano G.; De Massis A.; Chirico F. Firm philanthropy in small-and medium-sized family firms: The effects of family involvement in ownership and management. Fam. Bus. Rev. 2014, 27, 244-258.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  15. Carroll A.B. The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Bus. Horiz. 1991, 34, 39-48.

  16. Chen G.; Lu P.; Lin Z.; Song N. Introducing Chinese private enterprise survey: Points and prospects. Nankai Bus. Rev. Int. 2019, 10, 501-525.

  17. Chen J.; Dickson B.J. Allies of the state: Democratic support and regime support among China’s private entrepreneurs. China Q. 2008, 196, 780-804.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  18. Chen Z. Mutual dependence and selective coercion: Corporate environmental investment among Chinese private firms. Chin. Sociol. Rev. 2020, 52, 515-538.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  19. Chen Z.; Fuller D.B.; Zheng L. Institutional isomorphism and Chinese private corporate philanthropy: State coercion, corruption, and other institutional effects. Asian Bus. Manag. 2018, 17, 83-111.

  20. Cheng Z.; Wang F.; Keung C.; Bai Y. Will corporate political connection influence the environmental information disclosure level? Based on the panel data of A-shares from listed companies in shanghai stock market. J. Bus. Ethics 2017, 143, 209-221.

  21. Christmann P.; Taylor G. Globalization and the environment: Determinants of firm self-regulation in China. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2001, 32, 439-458.

  22. Conyon M.J.; He L.; Zhou X. Star CEOs or political connections? Evidence from China’s publicly traded firms. J. Bus. Finan. Account. 2015, 42, 412-443.

  23. Cruz C.; Larraza–Kintana M.; Garcés–Galdeano L.; Berrone P. Are family firms really more socially responsible?. Entrep. Theory Pract. 2014, 38, 1295-1316.

  24. Cui V.; Ding S.; Liu M.; Wu Z. Revisiting the effect of family involvement on corporate social responsibility: A behavioral agency perspective. J. Bus. Ethics 2018, 152, 291-309.

  25. Dal Maso L.; Basco R.; Bassetti T.; Lattanzi N. Family ownership and environmental performance: The mediation effect of human resource practices. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020, 29, 1548-1562.

  26. Darnall N.; Henriques I.; Sadorsky P. Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. J. Manag. Stud. 2010, 47, 1072-1094.

  27. Deegan C. An overview of legitimacy theory as applied within the social and environmental accounting literature. Sustainability Accounting and Accountability; Bebbington J.; Unerman J.; O’Dywer B. Routledge: London, UK, 2014; pp. 248-272.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Deegan C. The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures: A theoretical foundation. Account. Audit Account. 2002, 15, 282-311.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  29. Deephouse D.L.; Jaskiewicz P. Do family firms have better reputations than non-family firms? An integration of socioemotional wealth and social identity theories. J. Manag. Stud. 2013, 50, 337-360.

  30. Deephouse D.L.; Suchman M. Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism; Greenwood R.; Oliver C.; Suddaby R.; Sahlin-Andersson K. SAGE: London, UK, 2008; pp. 49-77.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. Del Sarto N.; Isabelle D.A.; Di Minin A. The role of accelerators in firm survival: An fsQCA analysis of Italian startups. Technovation 2020, 90–91, 102102.

  32. Dickson C.; Arcodia C. Promoting sustainable event practice: The role of professional associations. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2010, 29, 236-244.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  33. DiMaggio P.J.; Powell W.W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 1983, 48, 147-160.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  34. Dou J.; Su E.; Wang S. When does family ownership promote proactive environmental strategy? The role of the firm’s long-term orientation. J. Bus. Ethics 2019, 158, 81-95.

  35. Dou J.; Zhang Z.; Su E. Does family involvement make firms donate more? Empirical evidence from Chinese private firms. Fam. Bus. Rev. 2014, 27, 259-274.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  36. Dwekat A.; Seguí-Mas E.; Tormo-Carbó G.; Carmona P. Corporate governance configurations and corporate social responsibility disclosure: Qualitative comparative analysis of audit committee and board characteristics. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020, 27, 2879-2892.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  37. Elsayed K. Reexamining the expected effect of available resources and firm size on firm environmental orientation: An empirical study of UK firms. J. Bus. Ethics 2006, 65, 297-308.

  38. Eng S.; Woodside A.G. Configural analysis of the drinking man: Fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analyses. Addict. Behav. 2012, 37, 541-543.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  39. Fainshmidt S.; Witt M.A.; Aguilera R.V.; Verbeke A. The contributions of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to international business research. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2020, 51, 455-466.

  40. Fan C.C. China’s eleventh five-year plan (2006–2010): From “getting rich first” to “common prosperity”. Eurasian Geogr. Econ. 2006, 47, 708-723.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  41. Farivar F.; Richardson J. Workplace digitalisation and work-nonwork satisfaction: The role of spillover social media. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2020, 1-12.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  42. Fernando M.; Almeida S. The organizational virtuousness of strategic corporate social responsibility: A case study of the Sri Lankan family-owned enterprise MAS Holdings. Eur. Manag. J. 2012, 30, 564-576.

  43. Fiss P.C. A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 2007, 32, 1180-1198.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Fiss P.C. Building better causal theories: A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad. Manag. J. 2011, 54, 393-420.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  45. Foster K.W. Associations in the embrace of an authoritarian state: State domination of society?. Stud. Comp. Int. Dev. 2001, 35, 84-109.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  46. Gao Y.; Wang Y.; Zhang M. Who really cares about the environment? CEOs’ military service experience and firms’ investment in environmental protection. Bus. Ethics A Eur. Rev. 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  47. Garcia-Castro R.; Aguilera R.V. Family involvement in business and financial performance: A set-theoretic cross-national inquiry. J. Fam. Bus. Strategy 2014, 5, 85-96.

  48. Ge J.; Micelotta E. When does the family matter? Institutional pressures and corporate philanthropy in China. Organ. Stud. 2019, 40, 833-857.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  49. Ge J.; Zhao W. Institutional linkages with the state and organizational practices in corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. Manag. Organ. Rev. 2017, 13, 539-573.

  50. Gjølberg M. The origin of corporate social responsibility: Global forces or national legacies?. Socio-Econ. Rev. 2009, 7, 605-637.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Gomez-Mejia L.R.; Cruz C.; Berrone P.; De Castro J. The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2011, 5, 653-707.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  52. Gómez-Mejía L.R.; Haynes K.T.; Núñez-Nickel M.; Jacobson K.J.; Moyano-Fuentes J. Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Adm. Sci. Q. 2007, 52, 106-137.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  53. González-Cruz T.F.; Cruz-Ros S. When does family involvement produce superior performance in SME family business?. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 1452-1457.

  54. Graafland J. Family business ownership and cleaner production: Moderation by company size and family management. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 255, 120120.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  55. Graff Zivin J.; Small A. A Modigliani-Miller theory of altruistic corporate social responsibility. BE J. Econ. Anal. Policy 2005, 5, 10.

  56. Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 1985, 91, 481-510.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  57. Gul S.; Muhammad F.; Rashid A. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: The case of small, medium, and large firms. Pak. J. Commer. Soc. Sci. 2017, 11, 1-34.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  58. Halme M.; Rintamäki J.; Knudsen J.S.; Lankoski L.; Kuisma M. When is there a sustainability case for CSR? Pathways to environmental and social performance improvements. Bus. Soc. 2020, 59, 1181-1227.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  59. Ho J.; Plewa C.; Lu V.N. Examining strategic orientation complementarity using multiple regression analysis and fuzzy set QCA. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 2199-2205.

  60. Hollingsworth J.R. On Institutional Embeddedness in Advancing Socio-Economics: An Institutionalist Perspective; Hollingsworth J.R.; Müller K.H.; Hollingsworth E.J. Rowman & Littlefield: Lanham, MD, USA, 2002; pp. 87-108.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  61. Huang D.; Chen M. Business lobbying within the party-state: Embedding lobbying and political co-optation in China. China J. 2020, 83, 105-128.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  62. Jia N. Are collective political actions and private political actions substitutes or complements? Empirical evidence from China’s private sector. Strategy Manag. J. 2014, 35, 292-315.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  63. Johannisson B.; Ramírez-Pasillas M.; Karlsson G. The institutional embeddedness of local inter-firm networks: A leverage for business creation. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2002, 14, 297-315.

  64. Kane H.; Lewis M.A.; Williams P.A.; Kahwati L.C. Using qualitative comparative analysis to understand and quantify translation and implementation. Transl. Behav. Med. 2014, 4, 201-208.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  65. Kim Y. Consumer responses to the food industry’s proactive and passive environmental CSR, factoring in price as CSR tradeoff. J. Bus. Ethics 2017, 140, 307-321.

  66. King A.Y.C. Administrative absorption of politics in Hong Kong: Emphasis on the grass roots level. Asian Surv. 1975, 15, 422-439.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  67. Koos S. The institutional embeddedness of social responsibility: A multilevel analysis of smaller firms’ civic engagement in Western Europe. Socio-Econ. Rev. 2012, 10, 135-162.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  68. La Porta R.; Lopez-de-Silanes F.; Shleifer A. Corporate ownership around the world. J. Financ. 1999, 54, 471-517.

  69. Lamb N.H.; Butler F.C. The influence of family firms and institutional owners on corporate social responsibility performance. Bus. Soc. 2018, 57, 1374-1406.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  70. Lantos G.P. The ethicality of altruistic corporate social responsibility. J. Consum. Mark. 2002, 19, 205-230.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  71. Lee R.P.; Chen Q. The immediate impact of new product introductions on stock price: The role of firm resources and size. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2009, 26, 97-107.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  72. Lei Z.; Nugent J.B. Coordinating China’s economic growth strategy via its government-controlled association for private firms. J. Comp. Econ. 2018, 46, 1273-1293.

  73. Li X.; Li W.; Zhang Y. Family control, political connection, and corporate green governance. Sustainability 2020, 12.

  74. Li Y.; Ma L. What drives the governance of ridesharing? A fuzzy-set QCA of local regulations in China. Policy Sci. 2019, 52, 601-624.

  75. Liang X.; Wang L.; Cui Z. Chinese private firms and internationalization: Effects of family involvement in management and family ownership. Fam. Bus. Rev. 2014, 27, 126-141.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  76. Lin H.; Zeng S.X.; Ma H.Y.; Qi G.Y.; Tam V.W. Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 64, 63-72.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  77. Luo X.R.; Wang D. Are politically endorsed firms more socially responsible? Selective engagement in corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 2019, 1-21.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  78. Lux S.; Crook T.R.; Woehr D.J. Mixing business with politics: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and outcomes of corporate political activity. J. Manag. 2011, 37, 223-247.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  79. Ma J.; He X. The Chinese Communist Party’s integration policy towards private business and its effectiveness: An analysis of the Ninth National Survey of Chinese Private Enterprises. Chin. J. Sociol. 2018, 4, 422-449.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  80. Marquis C.; Qian C. Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance?. Organ. Sci. 2014, 25, 127-148.

  81. Mikalef P.; Krogstie J. Examining the interplay between big data analytics and contextual factors in driving process innovation capabilities. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 2020, 29, 260-287.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  82. Navarro S.; Llinares C.; Garzon D. Exploring the relationship between co-creation and satisfaction using QCA. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 1336-1339.

  83. Nohria N.; Gulati R. Is slack good or bad for innovation?. Acad. Manag. J. 1996, 39, 1245-1264.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  84. Peng L.; Li Y.; van Essen M.; Peng M.W. Institutions, resources, and strategic orientations: A meta-analysis. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 2020, 37, 499-529.

  85. Peng M.W.; Sun S.L.; Pinkham B.; Chen H. The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2009, 23, 63-81.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  86. Pittino D.; Chirico F.; Henssen B.; Broekaert W. Does increased generational involvement foster business growth? The moderating roles of family involvement in ownership and management. Eur. Manag. Rev. 2020, 17, 785-801.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Polanyi K. The Great Transformation; Beacon Press: Boston, MA, USA, 1944.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  88. Prencipe A.; Bar-Yosef S.; Dekker H.C. Accounting research in family firms: Theoretical and empirical challenges. Eur. Account. Rev. 2014, 23, 361-385.

  89. Preston L.E.; O’bannon D.P. The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis. Bus. Soc. 1997, 36, 419-429.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  90. Radaelli C.M.; Wagemann C. What did I leave out? Omitted variables in regression and qualitative comparative analysis. Eur. Polit. Sci. 2019, 18, 275-290.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  91. Ragin C.C. Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques; Rihoux B.; Ragin C.C. SAGE: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009; pp. 87-121.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  92. Ragin C.C. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2008.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  93. Ragin C.C. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1987.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  94. Raza A.; Muffatto M.; Saeed S. The influence of formal institutions on the relationship between entrepreneurial readiness and entrepreneurial behaviour. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2019, 26, 133-157.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  95. Rippa P.; Ferruzzi G.; Holienka M.; Capaldo G.; Coduras A. What drives university engineering students to become entrepreneurs? Finding different recipes using a configuration approach. J. Small Bus. Manag. 2020, 1-31.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  96. Samara G.; Berbegal-Mirabent J. Independent directors and family firm performance: Does one size fit all?. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2018, 14, 149-172.

  97. Sarkis J.; Ni N.; Zhu Q. Winds of change: Corporate social responsibility in China. Ivey Bus. J. 2011, 75, 1-4.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  98. Scherer A.G.; Palazzo G. The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. J. Manag. Stud. 2011, 48, 899-931.

  99. Schneider C.Q.; Rohlfing I. Combining QCA and process tracing in set-theoretic multi-method research. Sociol. Methods Res. 2013, 42, 559-597.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  100. Schneider C.Q.; Wagemann C. Standards of good practice in qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comp. Sociol. 2010, 9, 397-418.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  101. Schuler D.A.; Rehbein K. The filtering role of the firm in corporate political involvement. Bus. Soc. 1997, 36, 116-139.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  102. Schuler D.A.; Rehbein K.; Cramer R.D. Pursuing strategic advantage through political means: A multivariate approach. Acad. Manag. J. 2002, 45, 659-672.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  103. Sciascia S.; Mazzola P. Family involvement in ownership and management: Exploring nonlinear effects on performance. Fam. Bus. Rev. 2008, 21, 331-345.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  104. Sinthupundaja J.; Chiadamrong N.; Kohda Y. Internal capabilities, external cooperation and proactive CSR on financial performance. Serv. Ind. J. 2019, 39, 1099-1122.

  105. Skaaning S.E. Assessing the robustness of crisp-set and fuzzy-set QCA results. Sociol. Methods Res. 2011, 40, 391-408.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  106. Studer S.; Welford R.; Hills P. Drivers and Barriers to Engaging Small and Medium-Sized Companies in Voluntary Environmental Initiatives; The Centre of Urban Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Hong Kong: Hong Kong, China, 2005.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  107. Tian Z.; Gao H.; Cone M. A study of the ethical issues of private entrepreneurs participating in politics in China. J. Bus. Ethics 2008, 80, 627-642. Peng H. Interpreting CSR Policy for Large Chinese SOEs.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  108. Valaei N.; Rezaei S.; Ho R.C.; Okumus F. Beyond structural equation modelling in tourism research: Fuzzy Set/qualitative comparative analysis (fs/QCA) and data envelopment analysis (DEA). Quantitative Tourism Research in Asia; Rezaei S. Springer: Singapore, 2019; pp. 297-309.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  109. Villalonga B.; Amit R. Family ownership. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 2020, 36, 241-257.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  110. Wang Z.; Reimsbach D.; Braam G. Political embeddedness and the diffusion of corporate social responsibility practices in China: A trade-off between financial and CSR performance?. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 198, 1185-1197.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  111. Xu X.; Yan Y. Effect of political connection on corporate environmental investment: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Appl. Econ. Lett. 2020, 27, 1515-1521.

  112. Ye Y.; Li K. Impact of family involvement on internal and external corporate social responsibilities: Evidence from Chinese publicly listed firms. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  113. Yew C.P. The Chinese people’s political consultative conference: Co-opting social and political forces in a one-party state. Governing Society in Contemporary China; Yang L.; Shan W. World Scientific: Singapore, 2017; pp. 143-158.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  114. Yin J.; Zhang Y. Institutional dynamics and corporate social responsibility (CSR) in an emerging country context: Evidence from China. J. Bus. Ethics 2012, 111, 301-316.

  115. Yu B.; Zeng S.; Chen H.; Meng X.; Tam C. Doing more and doing better are two different entities: Different patterns of family control and environmental performance. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2021, 30, 1-20.

  116. Zeng S.X.; Xu X.D.; Yin H.T.; Tam C.M. Factors that drive Chinese listed companies in voluntary disclosure of environmental information. J. Bus. Ethics 2012, 109, 309-321.

  117. Zhang C. Political connections and corporate environmental responsibility: Adopting or escaping?. Energy Econ. 2017, 68, 539-547.

  118. Zhang D.; Ma Q.; Morse S. Motives for corporate social responsibility in Chinese food companies. Sustainability 2018, 10.

  119. Zhao H.; Lu J. Contingent value of political capital in bank loan acquisition: Evidence from founder-controlled private enterprises in China. J. Bus. Ventur. 2016, 31, 153-174.

  120. Zheng D.; Xie D.; Yuan W. The CPC party organization in privately controlled listed companies and earnings management. China J. Account. Stud. 2019, 7, 270-291.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  121. Zhou L.; Han Y.; Gou C. Influence of family involvement on family firm internationalization: The moderating effects of industrial and institutional environments. Sustainability 2019, 11.

  122. Zhou P.; Arndt F.; Jiang K.; Dai W. Looking backward and forward: Political links and environmental corporate social responsibility in China. J. Bus. Ethics 2020, 1-19.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  123. Zukin S.; DiMaggio P. Introduction. Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy; Zukin S.; DiMaggio P. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990; pp. 1-36.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Exploring the interplay between entrepreneurial orientation, causation and effectuation under unexpected covid-19 uncertainty: Insights from large French banks. (2024). Cherbib, Jihene.
    In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
    RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:200:y:2024:i:c:s0040162523007758.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Unraveling the resource puzzle: exploring entrepreneurial resource management and the quest for new venture success. (2023). Caiazza, Rosa ; Sedeh, Amirmahmood Amini ; Pezeshkan, Amir.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:48:y:2023:i:5:d:10.1007_s10961-023-10024-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. How bricoleurs go international: a European cross-country study considering the moderating role of governmental entrepreneurship support programs. (2023). de Cruppe, Katharina ; Jung, Philipp Benedikt ; Hensellek, Simon ; Kollmann, Tobias.
    In: The Journal of Technology Transfer.
    RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:48:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10961-022-09948-8.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Gender differences in management styles during crisis and the effect on firm performance. (2023). Skrinjaric, Bruno ; Radas, Sonja ; Botric, Valerija.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:iez:wpaper:2301.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. How Technological, Organizational, and Environmental Factors Drive Enterprise Digital Innovation: Analysis Based on the Dynamic FsQCA Approach. (2023). Gu, Hao ; Chen, Xiaohong ; Song, QI.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:16:p:12248-:d:1214744.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. The roles of innovation strategy and founding team diversity in new venture growth. (2023). Pickernell, David ; Battisti, Martina ; Huang, Shuangfa.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:158:y:2023:i:c:s0148296323000115.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The antecedents of entrepreneurial action: A meta-synthesis on effectuation and bricolage. (2023). Guerrazzi, Luiz ; Sarkar, Soumodip ; Serra, Fernando ; Scazziota, Vanessa.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:155:y:2023:i:pa:s0148296322008761.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Dynamic managerial capability portfolios in early internationalising firms. (2023). Torkkeli, Lasse ; Vuorio, Anna.
    In: International Business Review.
    RePEc:eee:iburev:v:32:y:2023:i:1:s0969593122000774.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Predictive vs. non-predictive entrepreneurial strategies: What’s the difference, anyway?. (2022). Rapp, David J.
    In: Review of Managerial Science.
    RePEc:spr:rvmgts:v:16:y:2022:i:7:d:10.1007_s11846-022-00519-7.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Narratives in entrepreneurial ecosystems: drivers of effectuation versus causation. (2022). Auer, Christine ; Wirtz, Jochen ; Most, Fabian ; Hubner, Sylvia.
    In: Small Business Economics.
    RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:59:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11187-021-00531-3.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Decision-making style in entrepreneurial finance and growth. (2022). Wirtz, Peter ; Cohen, Laurence.
    In: Small Business Economics.
    RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:59:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11187-021-00528-y.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Signalling entrepreneurs’ credibility and project quality for crowdfunding success: cases from the Kickstarter and Indiegogo environments. (2022). Nguyen, Thang ; Battisti, Martina ; Pickernell, David ; Huang, Shuangfa.
    In: Small Business Economics.
    RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:58:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11187-021-00477-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. How classical and entrepreneurial brand management increases the performance of internationalising SMEs?. (2022). Baumgarth, Carsten ; Gabrielsson, Peter ; Kusi, Samuel Yaw.
    In: Journal of World Business.
    RePEc:eee:worbus:v:57:y:2022:i:5:s1090951622000049.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Where business networks and institutions meet: Internationalization decision-making under uncertainty. (2022). Francioni, Barbara ; Ratajczak-Mrozek, Milena ; Oliveira, Luis ; Johanson, Martin ; Bai, Wensong.
    In: Journal of International Management.
    RePEc:eee:intman:v:28:y:2022:i:1:s1075425321000831.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. How bricolage influences green management in high?polluting manufacturing firms: The role of stakeholder engagement. (2022). Wu, Liang ; Liu, Heng.
    In: Business Strategy and the Environment.
    RePEc:bla:bstrat:v:31:y:2022:i:7:p:3616-3634.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. The Origin of Proactive Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility (ECSR) of Large Firms: Institutional Embeddedness—Driven, Family Involvement-Promoted, or Resource-Dependent?. (2021). Wang, Xiaohong ; Hu, Shilei.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:3:p:1197-:d:485971.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Beyond bricolage: Early-stage technology venture resource mobilization in resource-scarce contexts. (2021). Bacq, Sophie ; Reypens, Lina ; Milanov, Hana.
    In: Journal of Business Venturing.
    RePEc:eee:jbvent:v:36:y:2021:i:4:s0883902621000203.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. One size does not fit all: Strategy configurations, complex environments, and new venture performance in emerging economies. (2021). Kim, Phillip H ; Du, Yunzhou.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:124:y:2021:i:c:p:272-285.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. The role of middlegrounds entrepreneurial activities for the circulation of creative ideas. The case of Krautrock Music. (2020). Burger-Helmchen, Thierry ; Szostak, Berangere ; Muller, Paul.
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03539612.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-09 03:33:04 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.