- Beckmann, V.; Soregaroli, C.; Wesseler, J. Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-modified (non GM) crops: Are the two main property rights regimes equivalent with respect to the coexistence value? In Genetically Modified Food and Global Welfare; Colin, C., Moschini, G., Sheldon, I., Eds.; Emerald Group Publishing: Bingley, UK, 2011; Volume 10, pp. 201–224.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Beckmann, V.; Soregaroli, C.; Wesseler, J. Coexistence rules and regulations in the European Union. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2006, 88, 1193–1199. [CrossRef]
Beckmann, V.; Wesseler, J. Spatial dimension of externalities and the Coase theorem: Implications for co-existence of transgenic crops. In Regional Externalities; Heijman, W., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 223–242.
Belcher, K.; Nolan, J.; Phillips, P.W. Genetically modified crops and agricultural landscapes: Spatial patterns of contamination. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 53, 387–401. [CrossRef]
Ceddia, M.G.; Bartlett, M.; de Lucia, C.; Perrings, C. On the regulation of spatial externalities: Coexistence between GM and conventional crops in the EU and the ‘newcomer principle’. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2011, 55, 126–143. [CrossRef]
Consmüller, N.; Beckmann, V.; Petrick, M. An econometric analysis of regional adoption patterns of Bt maize in Germany. Agric. Econ. 2010, 41, 275–284. [CrossRef] Land 2016, 5, 33 18 of 18
Costa-Font, M.; Gil, J.M.; Traill, W.B. Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food: Review and implications for food policy. Food Policy 2008, 33, 99–111. [CrossRef]
Demont, M.; Dillen, K.; Daems, W.; Sausse, C.; Tollens, E.; Mathijs, E. On the proportionality of EU spatial ex ante coexistence regulations. Food Policy 2009, 34, 508–518. [CrossRef]
- Flood, C. Pollen drift and potential causes of action. J. Corp. Law 2002, 28, 473–497.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Fotopoulos, C.; Krystallis, A. Organic product avoidance: Reasons for rejection and potential buyers’ identification in a countrywide survey. Br. Food J. 2002, 104, 233–260. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Groeneveld, R.; Wesseler, J.; Berentsen, P. Dominos in the dairy: An analysis of transgenic maize in Dutch dairy farming. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 86, 107–116. [CrossRef]
- Lavigne, C.; Klein, E.; Vallée, P.; Pierre, J.; Godelle, B.; Renard, M. A pollen-dispersal experiment with transgenic oilseed rape. Estimation of the average pollen dispersal of an individual plant within a field. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1998, 96, 886–896. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lusk, J.L.; Jamal, M.; Kurlander, L.; Roucan, M.; Taulman, L. A meta-analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies. J. Agric. Res. Econ. 2005, 30, 28–44.
- Magnusson, M.K.; Arvola, A.; Hursti, U.K.; Åberg, L.; Sjödén, P. Choice of organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behaviour. Appetite 2003, 40, 109–117. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Munro, A. The spatial impact of genetically modified crops. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 67, 658–666. [CrossRef]
- Perry, J.N. Sensitive dependencies and separation distances for genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Proc. Biol. Soc. 2002, 269, 1173–1176. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Quedas, F.M.; Ponte, J.; Trinidade, C.; Punt, M.; Wesseler, J. A question of segregation: ‘GM-free’ maize bread in Portugal. EuroChoices 2016, 15, 59–63. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Schenkelaars, P.; Wesseler, J. Farm-level GM Coexistence Policies in the EU: Context, Concepts, and Developments. EuroChoices 2016, 15, 5–11. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Skevas, T.; Fevereiro, P.; Wesseler, J. Coexistence regulations & agriculture production: A case study of five Bt maize producers in Portugal. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69, 2402–2408.
- University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture Research and Extension. 2014 Crop Enterprise Budgets for Arkansas Field Crops Planted in 2014. December 2013. Available online: http://www.uaex.edu/farmranch /economics-marketing/docs/Budgets%202014_C.pdf (accessed on 9 August 2016). 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Varacca, A.; Soregaroli, C. Identity preservation in international feed supply chains. EuroChoices 2016, 15, 38–43. [CrossRef]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Venus, T.; Punt, M; Dillen, K.; Wesseler, J. The costs of coexistence measures for genetically modified maize in Germany. J. Agric. Econ. 2016. [CrossRef]
- Venus, T.; Punt, M.; Wesseler, J. Labelling genetically modified-free products—A case study of dairy companies in Germany. EuroChoices 2016, 15, 45–51.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Weekes, R.; Allnutt, T.; Boffey, C.; Morgan, S.; Bilton, M.; Daniels, R.; Henry, C. A study of crop-to-crop gene flow using farm scale sites of fodder maize (Zea mays L.) in the UK. Transgenic Res. 2007, 16, 203–211. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Wesseler, J. Biotechnologies and agrifood strategies: Opportunities, threads and economic implications. Bio-Based Appl. Econ. 2014, 3, 187–204.
- Wesseler, J.; Beckmann, V.; Soregaroli, C. Coexistence of GM and non-GM supply chains in the EU: Policy framework and economic aspects. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Socioeconomic Impacts of Genetically Modified Crops, Seville, Spain, 23–24 November 2011; pp. 75–79.
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now