Acharya, V. ; Subramanian, K. Bankruptcy codes and innovation. 2007 :
Aghion, P. ; Bloom, N. ; Blundell, R. ; Griffith, R. ; Howitt, P. Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. 2005 Quarterly Journal of Economics. 120 701-728
Aghion, P. ; Tirole, J. The management of innovation. 1994 Quarterly Journal of Economics. 109 1185-1209
- Allison, J. ; Lemley, M. Empirical analysis of the validity of litigated patents. 1998 American Intellectual Property Law Association Quarterly Journal. 26 185-275
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Anand, B. ; Khanna, T. The structure of licensing contracts. 2000 Journal of Industrial Economics. 48 103-135
Anton, J. ; Yao, D. Expropriation and inventions: Appropriable rents in the absence of property rights. 1994 American Economic Review. 84 190-209
Anton, J. ; Yao, D. Little patents and big secrets: Managing intellectual property. 2004 RAND Journal of Economics. 35 1-122
Anton, J. ; Yao, D. The sale of ideas: Strategic disclosure, property rights and contracting. 2002 Review of Economics Studies. 69 513-531
Aoki, R. ; Spiegel, Y. Public disclosure of patent applications, R&D and welfare. 1998 :
Arora, A. ; Ceccagnoli, M. ; Cohen, W. R&D and the patent premium. 2003 :
- Arora, A. ; Fosfuri, A. ; Gambardella, A. Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy. 2001 MIT Press: Cambridge, MA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Arrow, K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources to invention. 1962 En : Nelson, R. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA
- Ayres, I. ; Klemperer, P. Limiting patentees' market power without reducing innovation incentives: The perverse benefits of uncertainty and non-injunctive remedies. 1999 Michigan Law Review. 97 985-1033
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Baker, S. ; Mezzetti, C. Disclosure as a strategy in the patent race. 2005 Journal of Law and Economics. 48 173-194
Bar, T. Defensive publications in an R&D race. 2006 Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. 15 229-254
Belenzon, S. Knowledge flow and sequential innovation: Implications for technology diffusion R&D and market value. 2006 :
Bessen, J. The value of U.S. patents by owner and patent characteristics. 2006 :
Bessen, J. ; Maskin, E. Sequential innovation, patents and imitation. 2009 RAND Journal of Economics. 40 611-635
- Bessen, J. ; Meurer, M. The private costs of patent litigation. 2008 :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bessen, J. ; Meurer, M. The value of U.S. patents by owner and patent characteristics. 2008 Research Policy. 37 932-945
- Bidgoli, H. . 2010 Wiley: New York
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Bloom, N. ; Schankerman, M. ; Van Reenen, J. Identifying technology spillovers and product market rivalry. 2007 :
Boldrin, M. ; Levine, D. Rent-seeking and innovation. 2003 Journal of Monetary Economics. 51 127-160
Boncinelli, L. Global vs. local information in (anti-)coordination problems with imitators. 2008 The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics. 8 -
Boyce, J. ; Hollis, A. Preliminary injunctions and damage rules in patent law. 2007 Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. 16 385-405
Brunt, L. ; Lerner, J. ; Nicholas, T. Inducement prizes and innovation. 2008 :
- Calabresi, G. ; Melamed, D. Property rules, liability rules and inalienability: One view of the cathedral. 1972 Harvard Law Review. 85 1089-1128
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Carlton, D. ; Gertner, R. Intellectual property, antitrust, and strategic behavior. 2003 En : . MIT Press: Cambridge, MA
Cassiman, B. ; Veugelers, R. R&D cooperation and spillovers: Some empirical evidence from Belgium. 2002 American Economic Review. 92 1169-1184
- Chen, M. ; Iyigun, M. Patent protection and strategic delays in technology development: Implications for economic growth. 2006 :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Choi, J. A dynamic analysis of licensing: The ‘boomerang’ effect and grant-back clauses. 2002 International Economic Review. 43 803-829
Choi, J. Patent pools and cross-licensing in the shadow of patent litigation. 2003 :
Cohen, W. ; Levinthal, D. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. 1989 The Economic Journal. 99 569-596
Cohen, W. ; Nelson, R. ; Walsh, J. Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). 2000 :
Comino, S. ; Manenti, F. ; Nicolo, A. Sequential innovations with unobservable follow-on investments. 2007 :
Cornelli, F. ; Schankerman, M. Patent renewals and R&D incentives. 1999 RAND Journal of Economics. 30 197-213
Crampes, C. ; Langinier, C. Litigation and settlement in patent infringement cases. 2002 RAND Journal of Economics. 33 258-274
- Denicolo, V. Patent races and optimal patent breadth and length. 1996 The Journal of Industrial Economics. 44 249-265
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Denicolo, V. Two-stage patent races and patent policy. 2000 RAND Journal of Economics. 31 488-501
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Denicolo, V. ; Franzoni, L. The contract theory of patents. 2004 International Review of Law and Economics. 23 365-380
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Dewatripont, M. ; Legros, P. ‘Essential’ patents, FRAND royalties and technological standards. 2008 :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Ebert, L. How high are the grant rates at the USPTO?. 2004 Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society. 86 568-576
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Eisenberg, R. Patents and the progress of science: Exclusive rights and experimental use. 1989 The University of Chicago Law Review. 56 1017-1086
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Encoua, D. ; Lefouili, Y. Licensing Uncertain Patents: Per-Unit Royalty vs. Up-Front Fee. 2008 Paris School of Economics, University of Paris-I Pantheon Sorbonne: Paris
Eswaran, M. Cross-licensing of competing patents and a facilitating device. 1994 Canadian Journal of Economics. 28 698-708
Evans, D. ; Schmalensee, R. Some economic aspects of antitrust analysis in dynamically competitive industries. 2002 En : . MIT Press: Cambridge, MA
- Farrell, J. Some arguments for weaker intellectual property protection in network industries. 1995 StandardView. 3 46-49
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Farrell, J. ; Hayes, J. ; Shapiro, C. ; Sullivan, T. Standard Setting, Patents, and Hold-Up. 2007 University of California at Berkeley: Berkeley
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Farrell, J. ; Katz, M. Innovation, rent extraction, and integration in system markets. 2000 Journal of Industrial Economics. 48 413-432
- Farrell, J. ; Katz, M. The effects of antitrust and intellectual property law on compatibility and innovation. 1998 Antitrust Law Bulletin. 43 609-650
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Farrell, J. ; Shapiro, C. How strong are weak patents?. 2007 :
Fershtman, C. ; Kamien, M. Cross-licensing of complementary technologies. 1992 International Journal of Industrial Organization. 10 329-348
Galasso, A. ; Schankerman, M. Patent thickets and the market for innovation: Evidence from settlement of patent disputes. 2008 :
Gallini, N. Deterrence by market sharing: A strategic incentive for licensing. 1984 American Economic Review. 74 931-941
Gallini, N. Patent policy and costly imitation. 1992 RAND Journal of Economics. 23 52-63
Gallini, N. The economics of patents: Lessons from recent U.S. patent reform. 2002 Journal of Economic Perspectives. 16 131-154
Gallini, N. ; Scotchmer, S. Intellectual property: When is it the best incentive system?. 2002 En : . MIT Press: Cambridge, MA
Geradin, D. ; Layne-Farrar, A. ; Padilla, A.J. The ex ante auction model for the control of market power in standard setting organisations. 2007 :
- Gilbert, R. The 1995 Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property: New Signposts for the Intersection of Intellectual Property and the Antitrust Law. 1995 Department of Justice: Washington, DC
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Gilbert, R. ; Katz, M. Efficient division of profits from complementary innovations. 2007 :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gilbert, R. ; Katz, M. Should good patents come in small packages? A welfare analysis of intellectual property bundling. 2006 International Journal of Industrial Organization. 24 931-952
Gilbert, R. ; Newbery, D. Preemptive patenting and the persistence of monopoly. 1982 American Economic Review. 72 514-526
Gilbert, R. ; Shapiro, C. Antitrust issues in the licensing of intellectual property: The nine no-no's meet the nineties. 1997 En : Winston, C. ; Baily, M.N. ; Reiss, P.C. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Microeconomics 1997. Brookings Institution Press: Washington, DC
Gilbert, R. ; Shapiro, C. Optimal patent length and breadth. 1990 RAND Journal of Economics. 21 106-112
- Gilbert, R. ; Sunshine, S. Incorporating dynamic efficiency concerns in merger analysis: The use of innovation markets. 1995 Antitrust Law Journal. 63 569-602
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Gill, D. Strategic disclosure of intermediate research results. 2008 Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. 17 733-758
Giuri, P. ; Mariani, M. ; Brusoni, S. ; Crespi, G. ; Francoz, D. ; Gambardella, A. ; Garcia-Fontes, W. ; Geuna, A. ; Gonzales, R. ; Harhoff, D. ; Hoisl, K. ; Lebas, C. Everything you always wanted to know about inventor (but never asked): evidence from the PATVAL-EU survey. 2006 :
- Glachant, M. ; Meniere, Y. Technology Diffusion with Learning Spillovers: Patent versus Free Access. 2008 Ecole des Mines: Paris
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Graham, S. ; Harhoff, D. Can post-grant reviews improve patent system design? A twin study of US and European patents. 2006 :
Green, J. ; Scotchmer, S. On the division of profit in sequential innovation. 1995 RAND Journal of Economics. 26 20-33
Greenhalgh, C. ; Rogers, M. The Value of Intellectual Property Rights to Firms. 2007 Oxford Intellectual Property Research Centre, Oxford University: Oxford
Greenhalgh, C. ; Rogers, M. Trade Marks and Performance in UK Firms: Evidence of Schumpeterian Competition through Innovation. 2007 Oxford Intellectual Property Research Centre, Oxford University: Oxford
Guellec, D. ; van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. The Economics of the European Patent System: IP Policy for Competition and Innovation. 2007 Oxford University Press: Oxford
Hall, B. Patents and patent policy. 2007 Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 23 541-567
Hall, B. The financing of research and development. 2002 Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 18 35-51
Hall, B. ; Graham, S. ; Harhoff, D. ; Mowery, D. Prospects for improving U.S. patent quality via postgrant opposition. 2003 En : . MIT Press: Cambridge, MA
Hall, B. ; Lerner, J. Financing R&D and innovation. 2010 En : . Elsevier: Amsterdam
- Hall, B. ; Ziedonis, R. The effects of strengthening patent rights on firms engaged in cumulative innovation: Insights from the semiconductor industry. 2001 En : Libecap, G. Entrepreneurial Inputs and Outcomes: New Studies of Entrepreneurship in the United States, vol. 13. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth. Elsevier: Amsterdam
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Hall, B. ; Ziedonis, R. The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. 2001 RAND Journal of Economics. 32 101-128
Harhoff, D. ; Henkel, J. ; von Hippel, E. Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: How users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. 2003 Research Policy. 32 1753-1769
Harhoff, D. ; Reitzig, M. Determinants of oppositions against EPO patent grants: The case of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals. 2004 International Journal of Industrial Organization. 22 443-480
Harhoff, D. ; Wagner, S. Business method patents in europe and their strategic use—Evidence from franking device manufacturers. 2006 Munich School of Management, University of Munich: Munich, Germany
Harhoff, D. ; Wagner, S. Modelling the duration of patent examination at the European Patent Office. 2005 :
Hedge, D. ; Mowery, D. ; Graham, S. Pioneers, submariners, or thicket-builders: Which firms use continuations in patenting?. 2007 :
- Heller, M. ; Eisenberg, R. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. 1998 Science. 280 698-701
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Henkel, J. The jukebox mode of innovation—A model of commercial open source development. 2004 :
Hopenhayn, H. ; Llobet, G. ; Mitchell, M. Rewarding sequential innovators: Prizes, patents, and buyouts. 2006 Journal of Political Economy. 114 1041-1068
Hopenhayn, H. ; Mitchell, M. Innovation variety and patent breadth. 2001 RAND Journal of Economics. 32 152-166
Horowitz, A. ; Lai, E. Patent length and the rate of innovation. 1996 International Economic Review. 37 785-801
Horstmann, I. ; MacDonald, G. ; Slivinski, A. Patents as information transfer mechanisms: To patent or (maybe) not to patent. 1985 The Journal of Political Economy. 93 837-858
Hunt, R. Patentability, industry structure, and innovation. 2004 Journal of Industrial Economics. 52 401-426
Hylton, K. Property rules and liability rules, once again. 2006 Review of Law and Economics. 2 137-191
Jaffe, A. The U.S. patent system in transition: Policy innovation and the innovation process. 2000 Research Policy. 29 531-557
Jaffe, A. ; Lerner, J. Innovation and Its Discontents: How Our Broken Patent System Is Endangering Innovation and Progress and What to Do About It. 2006 Princeton University Press: Princeton
- Janis, M. Experimental Use and the Shape of Patent Rights for Plant Innovation. 2003 University of Iowa School of Law: Iowa
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Kaplow, L. The patent–antitrust intersection: A reappraisal. 1984 Harvard Law Review. 97 1813-1892
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Katz, M. ; Shapiro, C. R&D rivalry with licensing or imitation. 1987 American Economic Review. 77 402-420
Katz, M. ; Shapiro, C. Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. 1986 Journal of Political Economy. 94 822-841
- Katz, M. ; Shelanski, H. Merger policy and innovation: Must enforcement change to account for technological change?. 2006 En : . MIT Press: Cambridge, MA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Katz, M. ; Shelanski, H. Mergers and innovation. 2007 Antitrust Law Journal. 74 1-86
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Kim, J. ; Marschke, G. Labour mobility of scientists, technological diffusion, and the firm's patenting decision. 2005 RAND Journal of Economics. 36 298-317
Kitch, E. The nature and function of the patent system. 1977 Journal of Law and Economics. 20 265-290
Klemperer, P. How broad should the scope of patent protection be?. 1990 RAND Journal of Economics. 21 113-130
Kremer, M. Patent buyouts: A mechanism for encouraging innovation. 1998 Quarterly Journal of Economics. 113 1137-1167
La Manna, M. Research vs. development: Optimal patenting policy in a three-stage model. 1994 European Economic Review. 38 1423-1440
- Lakhani, K. ; Wolf, R. Why hackers do what they do? Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. 2005 En : Feller, J. ; Fitzgerald, B. ; Hissam, S. ; Lakhani, K. Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Langinier, C. Using patents to mislead rivals. 2005 Canadian Journal of Economics. 38 520-545
Lanjouw, J. ; Lerner, J. Tilting the table? The use of preliminary injunctions. 2001 Journal of Law and Economics. 44 573-603
Lanjouw, J. ; Schankerman, M. Characteristics of patent litigation: A window on competition. 2001 RAND Journal of Economics. 32 129-151
Lanjouw, J. ; Schankerman, M. Protecting intellectual property rights: Are small firms handicapped?. 2004 Journal of Law and Economics. 47 45-74
- Layne-Farrar, A. ; Lerner, J. To Join or Not to Join: Examining Patent Pool Participation and Rent Sharing Rules. 2008 Harvard University: Cambridge, MA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Lemley, M. Rational ignorance at the patent office. 2001 Northwestern University Law Review. 95 1497-1532
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Lemley, M. ; Shapiro, C. Patent holdup and royalty stacking. 2007 Texas Law Review. 85 1990-2049
Lemley, M. ; Shapiro, C. Probabilistic patents. 2005 Journal of Economic Perspectives. 19 75-98
Lerner, J. 150 Years of patent office practice. 2005 American Law and Economics Review. 7 112-143
Lerner, J. Patenting in the shadow of competitors. 1995 Journal of Law and Economics. 38 463-495
Lerner, J. ; Tirole, J. Efficient patent pools. 2004 American Economic Review. 94 691-711
Lerner, J. ; Tirole, J. Some simple economics of open source. 2002 Journal of Industrial Economics. 50 197-234
Lerner, J. ; Tirole, J. The economics of technology sharing: Open source and beyond. 2005 The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 19 99-120
- Lichtman, D. Patent Holdouts in the Standard-Setting Process. Academic Advisory Council Bulletin 1.3. 2006 Progress and Freedom Foundation: Washington, DC
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Manelli, A. ; Regibeau, P. ; Rockett, K. Trademark protection and post-patent competition. 1994 Cuadernos Economicos de ICE. 57 115-139
Matutes, C. ; Regibeau, P. ; Rockett, K. Optimal patent design and the diffusion of innovations. 1996 RAND Journal of Economics. 27 60-83
Maurer, S. ; Scotchmer, S. Open source software: The new intellectual property paradigm. 2006 En : Hendershott, T. Handbook on Economics and Information Systems. Elsevier: Amsterdam
- Maurer, S. ; Scotchmer, S. Procuring knowledge. 2004 En : Libecap, G. Intellectual Property and Entrepreneurship, vol. 15: Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth. Elsevier: Amsterdam
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Maurer, S. ; Scotchmer, S. Profit neutrality in licensing: The boundary between antitrust law and patent law. 2006 American Law and Economics Review. 8 476-522
Maurer, S. ; Scotchmer, S. The independent invention defence in intellectual property. 2002 Economica. 69 535-547
Menell, P. ; Scotchmer, S. Intellectual property. 2007 En : Polinsky, M. ; Shavell, S. Handbook of Law and Economics. Elsevier: Amsterdam
- Merges, R. Institutions for Intellectual Property Transactions: The Case of Patent Pools. 1999 School of Law, University of California at Berkeley: Berkeley
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Merges, R. ; Menell, P. ; Lemley, M. Intellectual property in the new technological age. 2006 Aspen: New York
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Merges, R.P. ; Nelson, R.R. On the complex economics of patent scope. 1990 Columbia Law Review. 90 839-916
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Middendorf, W. . 1981 CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Miller, A. ; Davis, M.H. Intellectual Property: Patents, Trademarks and Copyright in a Nutshell. 1983 West Publishing: St. Paul, MN
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Miyagiwa, K. Collusion and research joint ventures. 2007 :
Moser, P. Do patent laws influence innovation? Evidence from nineteenth-century world's fairs. 2005 American Economic Review. 95 1214-1236
Nard, C. ; Morriss, A. Constitutionalizing patents: From Venice to Philadelphia. 2006 Review of Law and Economics. 2 223-321
Noel, M. ; Schankerman, M. Strategic patenting and software innovation. 2006 :
- Nordhaus, W. Invention, Growth and Welfare: A Theoretical Treatment of Technological Change. 1969 MIT Press: Cambridge, MA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
O'Donoghue, T. A patentability requirement for sequential innovation. 1998 RAND Journal of Economics. 29 654-679
O'Donoghue, T. ; Scotchmer, S. ; Thisse, J.-F. Patent breadth, patent life, and the pace of technological progress. 1998 Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. 7 1-32
Pakes, A. Patents as options: Some estimates of the value of holding European patent stocks. 1986 Econometrica. 54 755-784
Qian, Y. Do additional national patent laws stimulate domestic innovation in a global patenting environment? A cross-country analysis of pharmaceutical patent protection, 1978–2002. 2007 Review of Economics and Statistics. 89 436-453
- Regibeau, P. ; Rockett, K. The relationship between intellectual property law and competition law: An economic approach. 2007 En : Anderman, S. The Interface Between Intellectual Property Rights and Competition Policy. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Sakakibara, M. ; Branstetter, L. Do stronger patents induce more innovation? Evidence from the 1988 Japanese patent law reforms. 2001 RAND Journal of Economics. 32 77-100
Schankerman, M. ; Scotchmer, S. Damages and injunctions in the protection of intellectual property. 2001 RAND Journal of Economics. 32 199-220
Schmidt, K. Complementary patents and market structure. 2008 :
- Scotchmer, S. Innovation and incentives. 2004 MIT Press: Cambridge, MA
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Scotchmer, S. On the optimality of the patent renewal system. 1999 RAND Journal of Economics. 30 181-196
Scotchmer, S. Protecting early innovators: Should second-generation products be patentable?. 1996 RAND Journal of Economics. 27 322-331
- Scotchmer, S. R&D joint ventures and other cooperative arrangements. 1998 En : Anderson, R. ; Gallini, N. Competition Policy and Intellectual Property Rights in the Knowledge-Based Economy. University of Calgary Press: Calgary
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Scotchmer, S. Standing on the shoulders of giants: Cumulative research and the patent law. 1991 The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 5 29-41
Scotchmer, S. ; Green, J. Novelty and disclosure in patent law. 1990 RAND Journal of Economics. 21 131-146
Segal, I. ; Whinston, M. Antitrust in innovative industries. 2007 American Economic Review. 97 1703-1730
Sena, V. The return of the Prince of Denmark: A survey on recent developments in the economics of innovation. 2004 The Economic Journal. 114 F312-F332
Severinov, S. On information sharing and incentives in R&D. 2001 RAND Journal of Economics. 32 542-564
Shapiro, C. Antitrust limits to patent settlements. 2003 RAND Journal of Economics. 34 391-411
Shapiro, C. Navigating the patent thicket: cross-licenses, patent pools and standard-setting. 2001 En : . MIT Press: Cambridge, MA
Shapiro, C. Patent reform: Aligning reward and contribution. 2008 En : . MIT Press: Cambridge, MA
- Shapiro, C. Patent system reform: Economic analysis and critique. 2004 Berkeley Technology Law Journal. 19 1017-1047
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Shavell, S. ; Ypersele, T. Rewards versus intellectual property rights. 2001 Journal of Law and Economics. 44 525-547
- Siebert, R. ; von Graevenitz, G. How licensing resolves hold-up: Evidence from a dynamic panel data model with unobserved heterogeneity. 2005 :
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Sorenson, O. ; Fleming, L. Science and the diffusion of knowledge. 2004 Research Policy. 33 1615-1634
- Swanson, D. ; Baumol, W. Reasonable and nondiscriminatory (RAND) royalties, standards selection, and control of market power. 2005 Antitrust Law Journal. 73 1-58
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Tandon, P. Optimal patents with compulsory licensing. 1982 Journal of Political Economy. 90 470-486
Tao, Z. ; Wu, C. On the organization of cooperative research and development: Theory and evidence. 1997 International Journal of Industrial Organization. 15 573-596
Trajtenberg, M. Government support for commercial R&D: Lessons from the Israeli experience. 2002 En : . MIT Press: Cambridge, MA
Van Dijk, T. Licence contracts, future exchange clauses, and technological competition. 2000 European Economic Review. 44 1431-1448
Van Zeebroeck, N. ; Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. Filing strategies and patent value. 2008 :
Varian, H. Copying and copyright. 2005 Journal of Economic Perspectives. 19 121-138
Vickers, J. The evolution of market structure when there is a sequence of innovations. 1986 Journal of Industrial Economics. 35 1-12
Von Graevenitz, G. Which reputations does a brand owner need?. 2007 LMU: Munich, Germany
Von Graevenitz, G. ; Wagner, S. ; Harhoff, D. Incidence and Growth of Patent Thickets—The Impact of Technological Opportunities and Complexity. 2008 Munich School of Management, Ludwig Maximilians University: Munich, Germany
- Walsh, J. ; Arora, A. ; Cohen, W. Effects of research tool patents and licensing on biomedical innovation. 2003 En : Cohen, W. ; Merrill, S. Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy. National Academies Press: Washington, DC
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
- Walsh, J. ; Cho, C. ; Cohen, W. View from the bench: Patents and material transfers. 2005 Science. 309 2002-2003
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Waterson, M. The economics of product patents. 1990 American Economic Review. 80 860-869
- Weston, R. A comparative analysis of the doctrine of equivalents: Can European approaches solve an American dilemma. 1998 IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology. 39 35-91
Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
Whinston, M. Exclusivity and tying in U.S. v. Microsoft: What we know and don't know. 2001 Journal of Economic Perspectives. 15 63-80
Whinston, M. Tying, foreclosure, and exclusion. 1990 American Economic Review. 80 837-859
Wright, B. The economics of invention incentives: Patents, prizes, and research contracts. 1983 American Economic Review. 73 691-707