Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Willingness-to-Accept and Willingness-to-Pay for GM and Non-GM Food: UK Consumers. (2004). Moon, Wanki ; Balasubramanian, Siva K..
In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
RePEc:ags:aaea04:20138.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 1

Citations received by this document

Cites: 29

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Consumer willingness to pay for genetically modified food in Kenya. (2008). De Groote, Hugo ; DeGroote, Hugo ; Kimenju, Simon Chege .
    In: Agricultural Economics.
    RePEc:bla:agecon:v:38:y:2008:i:1:p:35-46.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Baker and Burnham. 2001. Consumer Response to Genetically Modified Foods: Market Segment Analysis and Implications for Producers and Policy Makers. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 26 (2): 387-403. Buckingham, D. The Labeling of GM Foods - The Link between Codex and WTO.

  2. Burton, M., D. Rigby, T. Young, S. James. 2001. Consumer Attitudes to Genetically Modified Organisms in Food in the UK. European Review ofAgricultural Economics. 28 (4): 479-498.

  3. Gaskell, G. Agricultural Biotechnology and Public Attitudes in the European Union. AgBioForum, 3, 2000: 87-96.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  4. Gaskell, G., Bauer, M.W., Durant J. and Allum N.C. 1999. Worlds Apart? The Reception of Genetically Modified Foods in Europe and the U.S. Science, 16 Vol. 285.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  5. GaskeU, G.. Allum, N~, Bauer, M., Jackson, J., Howard, S., & Lindsey, N. (2003). Climate change for biotechnology? UK public opinion 199 i~2OO2. AgBioForwn, 6( 1&2), 55~$7, Available on the World Wide Web: http://www~agbioforurn.org. Freeman III, A. M. The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Resources for the Future. Washington, D.C.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  6. Haneman, W. M. 1991. Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ? American Economic Review, 81: 63 5-647.

  7. Haniotis, T. 2000. Regulating Agri-Food Production in the US and the EU. AgBioForum. Vol. 3: 132-136.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Hoban, T. Trends in Consumer Attitudes About Agricultural Biotechnology. AgBioForum, 1(1), 1998: 3-7.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  9. Huffman, W.E., J.F. Shorgren, M. Rousu, and A. Tegene. 2001. The Value to Consumers of GM Food Labels in a Market with Asymmetric Information: Evidence from Experimental Auctions. Presented for the 5th International Conference of the International Consortium on Agricultural Biotechnology Research (ICABR) Ravello, Italy.

  10. Josling, T. 2000. International Institutions, World Trade Rules, and GMOs. Genetically Modified Organisms in Agriculture: Economics and Politics. Ed. by G. C. Nelson. Academic Press.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Kahneman, D., J. L. Knetsch, and R. H. Thaler. 1990. Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98: 1325-1348.

  12. Kalaitzandonakes, N. G. 2000. Why Does Biotech Regulation Differ So Much Between the EU and the US. AgBioForum, Vol. 3: 75-76.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  13. Kealy M.J., and R.W. Turner. 1993. A Test of the Equality of Closed-Ended and OpenEnded Contingent Valuations. American Journal ofAgricultural Economics 75 :32 1-33 1.

  14. Kealy M.J., J.F. Dovidio, and M.L. Rockel. 1988. Accuracy in Valuation is a Matter of Degree. Land Economics 64:158-171.

  15. Kimbrell, E. 2000. What is Codex Alimentarius? AgBioForum. Vol. 3: 197-202.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  16. Loomis J., A. Gonalez-Caban, and R. Gregory. 1994. Do Reminders of Substitutes and Budget Constraints Influence Contingent Valuation Estimates? Land Economics 70: 499-506.

  17. Loomis, J., M. Lockwood, and T. DeLacy. 1993. Some Empirical Evidence on Embedding Effects in Contingent Valuation for Forest Protection. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 24: 45-55.

  18. Loureiro, M. L., J.J. Mccluskey, and R.C. Mittelhammer. 2002. Will Consumers Pay a Premium for Eco-labeled Apples? Journal of Consumer Affairs, 36, 2: 203-219.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  19. Lupien, J. R. The Codex Alimentarius Commission: International Science-Based Standards, Guidelines and Recommendations. AgBioForum. Vol. 3, No. 4 (2000): 192-196.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  20. Lusk, J. L. 2002. Effects of Cheap Talk on Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Golden Rice. Paper Presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association annual meeting, Long Beach, CA.

  21. Lusk, J.L., M.S. Daniel, D.R. Mark, and C.L. Lusk. 2001. Alternative Calibration and Auction Institutions for Predicting Consumer Willingness to Pay for Nongenetically Modified Corn Chips. Journal ofAgricultural and Resource Economics 26:40-57.

  22. MacKenzie, A. A. 2000. The Process of Developing Labeling Standards for GM Foods in the Codex Alimentarius. AgBioForum. Vol. 3, 4: 203-208.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Mitchell, R. C. and Carson R. T. 1989. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, DC, Resources for the Future.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Moon, W. and S. K. Balasubramanian. 2001. Public Perceptions and Willingness-to-pay a Premium for Non-biotech Foods in the US and UK. AgBioForum. 4 (3&4):221-23 1.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Moon, W. and S. K. Balasubramanian. 2003. Is There a Market for GM Food in Europe? Contingent Valuation of GM and Non-GM Breakfast Cereals in the United Kingdom. AgBioForum, 6 (3):23-28.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Moon, W. and S. K. Balasubramanian. 2003. Willingness-to-pay for Nonbiotech Foods in the US and UK. Journal of Consumer Affairs. Vol. 37, No. 2 (3 17-339).
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  27. Moon, W. and S. K. Balasubramanian. 2004. Public Attitudes Toward Agrobiotechnology: The Mediating Role of Risk Perceptions on the Impact of Trust, Awareness and Outrage. Review ofAgricultural Economics. Vol. 26, No 2 (1-23).

  28. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 1993. Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. U.S. Federal Register 58, 10:4602-4614.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  29. Sheldon, I.M. 2001. Regulation of Biotechnology: Will We Ever Freely Trade GMOs? European Review ofAgricultural Economics. Vol. 29, 1: 155-176.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. Comparing Perceptions of Biotechnology in Fresh versus Processed Foods: A Cross-Cultural Study. (2013). House, Lisa ; Kim, Hyeyoung.
    In: 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C..
    RePEc:ags:aaea13:149733.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Consumer Interest in Environmentally Beneficial Chicken Feeds: Comparing High Available Phosphorus Corn and Other Varieties. (2011). Bernard, John ; Gupta, Meeta ; Pesek, John D..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    RePEc:ags:joaaec:117945.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Parents Preferences for Health Labels on Foods for Children. (2011). Grebitus, Carola ; Colson, Gregory.
    In: 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland.
    RePEc:ags:eaae11:114284.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. An assessment of consumer preference for fair trade coffee in Toronto and Vancouver. (2010). Cranfield, John ; Northey, James ; Henson, Spencer ; Masakure, Oliver .
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:26:y:2010:i:2:p:307-325.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Explaining organic food choice on the basis of socio-demographics.A study in Portugal and Germany. (2010). Marreiros, Cristina ; Lucas, Maria Raquel ; Rohrich, Kerstin .
    In: CEFAGE-UE Working Papers.
    RePEc:cfe:wpcefa:2010_03.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Consumer preference for production-derived quality: analyzing perceptions of premium chicken production methods. (2009). Cranfield, John ; Innes, Brian .
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:25:y:2009:i:3:p:395-411.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Does altruism play a role in determining U.S. consumer preferences and willingness to pay for natural and regionally produced beef?. (2009). Umberger, Wendy ; Thilmany, Dawn ; Smith, Amanda R. ; Dawn D. Thilmany McFadden, .
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:25:y:2009:i:2:p:268-285.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Acceptance of biotechnology and social-cultural implications in Ghana. (2009). Yawson, Robert ; Williams, Irene E. ; Quaye, Wilhemina .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:33237.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Research: Are We Valuing the Right Stuff?. (2009). Brorsen, B.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:50079.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Consumer preferences for ground beef packaged under a modified atmosphere. (2009). Roosen, Jutta ; Jensen, Helen ; Grebitus, Carola ; Anders, Sven ; Sebranek, Joseph G..
    In: 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China.
    RePEc:ags:iaae09:51649.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. The Impact Of Socio-Demographic Factors And Political Perceptions On Consumer Attitudes Towards Genetically Modified Foods: An Econometric Investigation. (2009). Targoutzidis, Antonis ; Antonopoulou, Lina ; Papadas, Christos .
    In: Agricultural Economics Review.
    RePEc:ags:aergaa:58062.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Understanding consumer interest in product and process-based attributes for fresh produce. (2008). Thilmany, Dawn ; Bond, Craig A..
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:24:y:2008:i:2:p:231-252.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. Public approval of plant and animal biotechnology in South Korea: an ordered probit analysis. (2008). Govindasamy, Ramu ; Onyango, Benjamin ; Hallman, William K. ; Puduri, Venkata ; Jang, Ho-Min .
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:24:y:2008:i:1:p:102-118.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. A stakeholder approach to investigating public perception and attitudes towards agricultural biotechnology in Ghana. (2008). Yawson, Robert ; Williams, Irene E. ; Quaye, Wilhemina .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:34924.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. What to Choose? The Value of Label Claims to Fresh Produce Consumers. (2008). Thilmany, Dawn ; Bond, Craig A..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:46559.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Unobserved heterogeneity in the wine market: an analysis on Sardinian wine via Mixed Logit. (2008). Del Giudice, Teresa ; Pomarici, Eugenio ; Lai, Maria Bonaria.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ags:aawewp:45502.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Consumer preferences for extra virgin olive oil with country-of-origin and geographical indication labels in Canada. (2008). Menapace, Luisa ; Grebitus, Carola ; Colson, Gregory ; Facendola, Maria .
    In: 2008 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2008, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:aaea08:6430.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Determinants of consumer attitudes and purchase intentions with regard to genetically modified tomatoes. (2007). Bukenya, James O. ; Wright, Natasha R..
    In: Agribusiness.
    RePEc:wly:agribz:v:23:y:2007:i:1:p:117-130.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. Some Problems in Estimating Willingness to Pay with Contingent Valuation Surveys: Case for Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food. (2007). Kaneko, Naoya ; Chern, Wen S..
    In: 2007 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2007, Mobile, Alabama.
    RePEc:ags:saeasm:34852.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. DIMENSIONEN DER VERBRAUCHERRESONANZ BEI DER NEUPRODUKTBEURTEILUNG VON LEBENSMITTELN (German). (2007). Menrad, Klaus ; Sparke, Kai.
    In: 47th Annual Conference, Weihenstephan, Germany, September 26-28, 2007.
    RePEc:ags:gewi07:7611.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Consumer attitudes toward GM food with hypothetical functional characteristics. (2007). Marin, Floriana ; Notaro, Sandra.
    In: 105th Seminar, March 8-10, 2007, Bologna, Italy.
    RePEc:ags:eaa105:7878.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. A Mixture Model of Consumers Intended Purchase Decisions for Genetically Modified Foods. (2006). Grimsrud, Kristine M. ; Mittelhammer, Ron C..
    In: Economics Bulletin.
    RePEc:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2006:i:23:p:1-11.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Consumer Valuation of the Second Generation of Genetically Modified (GM) Foods with Benefits Disclosure. (2006). Harrison, R Wes ; Han, Jae-Hwan .
    In: 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida.
    RePEc:ags:saeaso:35277.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. The Relative Importance of Preferences for Country-of-Origin in China, France, Niger and the United States. (2006). Tyner, Wallace ; Tanner Ehmke, Mariah ; Lusk, Jayson.
    In: 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:iaae06:25408.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Identification of Consumer Segments and Its Implication on the Willingness-to-Pay Distribution: The Case of Demand for Non-Genetically Modified Vegetable Oil in the United States. (2006). Chern, Wen S. ; Kaneko, Naoya .
    In: 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea06:21194.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. Willingness to Pay for Genetically Modified Oil, Cornflakes, and Salmon: Evidence from a U.S. Telephone Survey. (2005). Kaneko, Naoya ; Chern, Wen S..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    RePEc:ags:joaaec:43504.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. A Cluster Analysis of Natural Beef Product Consumers by Shopping Behavior, Importance of Production Attributes, and Demographics. (2005). Umberger, Wendy ; Thilmany, Dawn ; Ziehl, Amanda .
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:26757.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. A Meta-Analysis of Genetically Modified Food Valuation Studies. (2005). Lusk, Jayson ; Kurlander, Lauren ; Jamal, Mustafa ; Roucan, Maud ; Taulman, Lesley.
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:30782.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Who Should Certify the Safety of Genetically Modified Foods?. (2005). Mazzocco, Michael .
    In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review.
    RePEc:ags:ifaamr:8157.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods in Taiwan: Is Positive Discount the Same as Negative Premium?. (2005). Chern, Wen S. ; Kaneko, Naoya .
    In: 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI.
    RePEc:ags:aaea05:19491.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. PUBLIC APPROVAL OF PLANT AND ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGY IN KOREA: AN ORDERED PROBIT ANALYSIS. (2004). Govindasamy, Ramu ; Onyango, Benjamin ; Hallman, William ; Puduri, Venkata ; Jang, Ho-Min .
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18180.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS IN KOREA: FACTOR AND CLUSTER ANALYSIS. (2004). Govindasamy, Ramu ; Onyango, Benjamin ; Hallman, William ; Puduri, Venkata S. ; Jang, Ho-Min .
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18179.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS: THE ROLE OF PRODUCT BENEFITS AND PERCEIVED RISKS. (2004). Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27144.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. Consumer Acceptance of Nutritionally Enhanced Genetically Modified Food: Relevance of Gene Transfer Technology. (2004). Nayga, Rodolfo ; Onyango, Benjamin M..
    In: Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    RePEc:ags:jlaare:30919.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. Identification of Niche Market for Hanwoo Beef: Understanding Korean Consumer Preference for Beef using Market Segment Analysis. (2004). Boyd, Milton ; Kim, Renee .
    In: International Food and Agribusiness Management Review.
    RePEc:ags:ifaamr:8152.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. Willingness-to-Accept and Willingness-to-Pay for GM and Non-GM Food: UK Consumers. (2004). Moon, Wanki ; Balasubramanian, Siva K..
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:20138.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. AGRICULTURAL INPUT MARKET SEGMENTS: WHO IS BUYING?. (2004). Wilson, Christine ; Alexander, Corinne ; Foley, Daniel .
    In: 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO.
    RePEc:ags:aaea04:19997.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS: ROLE OF PRODUCT BENEFITS AND PERCEIVED RISKS. (2003). Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18182.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. NUTRITIONAL BENEFITS AND CONSUMER WILLINGNESS TO BUY GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS. (2003). Adelaja, Adesoji ; Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27934.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. CONSUMER PREFERENCES AND WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR FOOD LABELING: A DISCUSSION OF EMPIRICAL STUDIES. (2003). McCluskey, Jill ; Loureiro, Maria.
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27051.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. COUNTRY-OF-ORIGIN LABELING OF BEEF PRODUCTS: U.S. CONSUMERS PERCEPTIONS. (2003). Umberger, Wendy ; Sitz, Bethany M. ; Feuz, Dillon M. ; Calkins, Chris R..
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27050.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY AND ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD. (2003). Onyango, Benjamin ; Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian.
    In: Journal of Food Distribution Research.
    RePEc:ags:jlofdr:27047.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food Products in the Developing World. (2003). Wahl, Thomas ; McCluskey, Jill ; Curtis, Kynda.
    In: 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia.
    RePEc:ags:aare03:57858.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. MARKET SEGMENTATION WITHIN CONTINGENT VALUATION. (2003). Mittelhammer, Ron ; Grimsrud, Kristine.
    In: 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada.
    RePEc:ags:aaea03:22108.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. A RISK PERCEPTION ANALYSIS OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS BASED ON STATED PREFERENCES. (2003). Loureiro, Maria ; Bugbee, Marcia.
    In: 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada.
    RePEc:ags:aaea03:22017.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. CONSUMER RESPONSE TO GMO FOODS: BRANDING, CERTIFICATION, AND CONSUMER CHARACTERISTICS. (2002). Mazzocco, Michael A..
    In: 2002 Annual Meeting, July 28-31, 2002, Long Beach, California.
    RePEc:ags:waealb:36562.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF BIOTECHNOLOGY AND ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD. (2002). Adelaja, Adesoji ; Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18185.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. UNCOVERING FACTORS INFLUENCING PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF FOOD BIOTECHNOLOGY. (2002). Adelaja, Adesoji ; Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18178.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF FOOD BIOTECHNOLOGY: WILLINGNESS TO BUY GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD PRODUCTS. (2002). Adelaja, Adesoji ; Hallman, William ; Hossain, Ferdaus ; Schilling, Brian ; Onyango, Benjamin.
    In: Research Reports.
    RePEc:ags:rutfwp:18169.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. CONSUMER ATTITUDES TOWARDS GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS IN NORWAY. (2002). Wahl, Thomas ; McCluskey, Jill ; Loureiro, Maria ; Grimsrud, Kristine.
    In: 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA.
    RePEc:ags:aaea02:19818.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-31 18:47:20 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.