Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
create a website
Board diversity and corporate social performance: Does the family firm status matter?. (2021). Rubino, Franco Ernesto ; Mazzotta, Romilda ; Veltri, Stefania.
In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
RePEc:wly:corsem:v:28:y:2021:i:6:p:1664-1679.

Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Cited: 12

Citations received by this document

Cites: 135

References cited by this document

Cocites: 50

Documents which have cited the same bibliography

Coauthors: 0

Authors who have wrote about the same topic

Citations

Citations received by this document

  1. Independent female directors and integrated reporting quality: The moderating role of family ownership. (2024). Alqadasi, Adel Ali ; Qaderi, Sumaia Ayesh ; Ghaleb, Belal Ali.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:31:y:2024:i:4:p:3429-3443.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. Corporate social responsibility in family business: Using machine learning to uncover who is doing good. (2024). Zhang, Jing ; Huang, Wanying ; Liu, Feng ; Fang, Mingjie.
    In: Technology in Society.
    RePEc:eee:teinso:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24000010.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Board gender diversity, corporate social commitment and sustainability. (2022). Treepongkaruna, Sirimon ; Chatjuthamard, Pattanaporn ; Arayakarnkul, Pochara.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:5:p:1706-1721.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Evaluating board diversity and its importance in the environmental and social performance of organizations. (2022). Ali, Muhammad ; French, Erica ; Islam, Ranjita.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:5:p:1134-1145.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Gender disclosure: The impact of peer behaviour and the firms equality policies. (2022). Tettamanzi, Patrizia ; Minutiello, Valentina ; Garciasanchez, Isabelmaria ; Isabel Maria GARCÍA SÁNCHEZ, .
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:2:p:385-405.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. Does board gender diversity improve the welfare of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender employees?. (2022). Padungsaksawasdi, Chaiyuth ; Jiraporn, Pornsit ; Treepongkaruna, Sirimon ; Kyaw, Khine.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:1:p:200-210.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Gender diversity and sustainability performance in the banking industry. (2022). Vermiglio, Carlo ; Naciti, Valeria ; Mazzu, Sebastiano ; Galletta, Simona.
    In: Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    RePEc:wly:corsem:v:29:y:2022:i:1:p:161-174.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. CHRO firm dinosaur versus CHRO role gorilla: the effect of CHRO company and role tenure on firms’ social performance. (2022). Brettel, Malte ; Fischer-Kreer, Denise ; Engels, Nina.
    In: Journal of Business Economics.
    RePEc:spr:jbecon:v:92:y:2022:i:6:d:10.1007_s11573-021-01073-6.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. Does Sustainable Development Goals Disclosure Affect Corporate Financial Performance?. (2022). Hussainey, Khaled ; al Lawati, Hidaya.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:13:p:7815-:d:848943.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Exploring the black box: Board gender diversity and corporate social performance. (2022). Tzeremes, Panayiotis ; Nerantzidis, Michail ; Koutoupis, Andreas ; Pourgias, Apostolos.
    In: Finance Research Letters.
    RePEc:eee:finlet:v:48:y:2022:i:c:s1544612322002355.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Board internationalization and corporate social responsibility. (2022). Ye, Aishan ; Wang, YU ; Ma, Jian ; Luo, YI.
    In: The North American Journal of Economics and Finance.
    RePEc:eee:ecofin:v:63:y:2022:i:c:s1062940822001553.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

References

References cited by this document

  1. Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact of governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.

  2. Adams, R., & Ferreira, D. (2007). A theory of friendly boards. Journal of Finance, 62(2), 217–250.

  3. Allegrini, M., & Greco, G. (2013). Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Journal of Management & Governance, 17(1), 187–216.

  4. Amorelli, M. F., & García‐Sánchez, I. M. (2020). Critical mass of female directors, human capital, and stakeholder engagement by corporate social reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 204–221.

  5. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P500. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328.

  6. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P500. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209–237.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  7. Azila‐Gbettor, E. M., Honyenuga, B. Q., Berent‐Braun, M. M., & Kil, A. (2018). Structural aspects of corporate governance and family firm performance: A systematic review governance. Journal of Family Business Management, 8(3), 306–330.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  8. Bachiller, P., Giorgino, M. C., & Paternostro, S. (2015). Influence of board of directors on firm performance: Analysis of family and non‐family firms. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 12, 230–253.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  9. Bai, G. (2013). How do board size and occupational background of directors influence social performance in for‐profit and nonprofit organizations? Evidence from California hospitals. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 171–187.

  10. Baltagi, B. H. (2005). Econometric analysis of panel data (3rd ed.). Wiley.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  11. Barako, D. G., & Brown, A. M. (2008). Corporate social reporting and board representation: Evidence from the Kenyan banking sector. Journal of Management & Governance, 12(4), 309–324.

  12. Beji, R., Yousfi1, O., Loukil, N., & Omri, A. (2020). Board diversity and corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04522-4.

  13. Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gómez‐Mejía, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  14. Bianco, M., Ciavarella, A., & Signoretti, R. (2015). Women on corporate boards in Italy: The role of family connections. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 129–144.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  15. Birindelli, G., Ianuzzi, A. P., & Savioli, M. (2019). The impact of women leaders on environmental performance: Evidence on gender diversity in banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1485–1499.

  16. Block, J. H., & Wagner, M. (2014). The effect of family ownership on different dimensions of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from large US firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23, 475–492.

  17. Boesso, G., Favotto, F., & Michelon, G. (2015). Stakeholder prioritization, strategic corporate social responsibility and company performance: Further evidence. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6), 424–440.

  18. Broccardo, L., Truant, E., & Zicari, A. (2019). Internal corporate sustainability drivers: What evidence from family firms? A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 1–18.

  19. Bronzetti, G., Veltri, S., & Mazzotta, R. (2016). Is there still something to learn about the association of corporate governance with firm performance? International Journal of Business Management, 10(11), 306–313.

  20. Bruno, G. S. F., Ciavarella, A., & Linciano, N. (2018). Gender diversity e performance delle società quotate in Italia, CONSOB Resource document. Retrieved from https://www.consob.it/documents/46180/46181/qdf87.pdf/8954940f-223c-422f-b0fc-bc8c9b6b806a.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  21. Byron, K., & Post, C. (2016). Women on boards of directors and corporate social performance: A meta‐analysis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(4), 428–442.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  22. Cambrea, D. R., Calabrò, A., La Rocca, M., & Paolone, F. (2021). The impact of boards of directors' characteristics on cash holdings in uncertain times. Journal of Management and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09557-3.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  23. Cambrea, D. R., Tenuta, P., & Vastola, V. (2020). Female directors and corporate cash holdings: Monitoring vs executive roles. Management Decision, 58(2), 295–312.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  24. Campopiano, G., Rinaldi, F. R., Sciascia, S., & De Massis, A. (2019). Family and non‐family women on the board of directors: Effects on corporate citizenship behavior in family‐controlled fashion firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 214, 41–51.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  25. Canavati, S. (2018). Corporate social performance in family firms: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Family Business Management, 8(3), 235–273.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  26. Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2015). Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  27. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, J. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 1–23.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  28. Coffey, B. S., & Wang, J. (1998). Board diversity and managerial control as predictors of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(14), 1595–1603.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  29. Comi, S., Grasseni, M., Origo, F., & Pagani, L. (2020). Where women make a difference: Gender quotas and firms' performance in three European countries. ILR Review, 73(3), 768–793.

  30. Corbetta, G., Quarato, F., & Minichilli, A. (2018). Dieci anni di capitalismo familiare, X rapporto AUB. Retrieved from https://www.aidaf.it/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/Report-AUB-X-edizione_Executive-Summary.pdf.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  31. Cordeiro, J. J., Profumo, G., & Tutore, I. (2020). Board gender diversity and corporate environmental performance: The moderating role of family and dual‐class majority ownership structures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(3), 1127–1144.

  32. Cuadrado‐Ballesteros, B., Martínez‐Ferrero, J., & García‐Sánchez, I. M. (2017). Board structure to enhance social responsibility development: A qualitative comparative analysis of US companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(6), 524–542.

  33. Cucari, N., De Falco, S. E., & Orlando, B. (2018). Diversity of board of directors and environmental social governance: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(3), 250–266.

  34. Culasso, F., Giacosa, E., Broccardo, L., & Manzi, L. M. (2015). Family Italian listed firms. Comparison in performances and identification of two main configurations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 23(4), 664–691.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  35. De Villiers, C., Naiker, V., & Van Staden, C. (2011). The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1636–1663.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  36. del Carmen Valls Martínez, M., Cruz Rambaud, S., & Parra Oller, I. M. (2019). Gender policies on board of directors and sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1539–1553.

  37. Deschênes, S., Rojas, M., Boubacar, H., Prud'homme, B., & Ouedraogo, A. (2015). The impact of board traits on the social performance of Canadian firms. Corporate Governance, 15, 293–305.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  38. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65–91.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  39. Dow, S., & McGuire, J. (2016). Family matters? A cross‐national analysis of the performance implications of family ownership. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(6), 584–598.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  40. Drago, C., Millo, F., Ricciuti, R., & Santella, P. (2011). The role of women in the Italian Network of Boards of Directors, 2003–2010 (WP series). Department of Economics, University of Verona.

  41. El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Wang, H., & Kwok, C. C. Y. (2016). Family control and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking and Finance, 73, 131–146.

  42. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.

  43. Farrar, D. E., & Glauber, R. R. (1967). Multicollinearity in regression analysis: The problem revisited. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49, 92–107.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  44. Fehre, K., & Weber, F. (2019). Why some are more equal: Family firm heterogeneity and the effect on management's attention to CSR. Business Ethics, 28(3), 321–334.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  45. Fernandez‐Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz‐Blanco, S. (2014). Women on boards: Do they affect sustainability reporting? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(6), 351–364.

  46. Ferrari, G., Ferraro, V., Profeta, P., & Pronzato, C. (2016). Gender quotas: Challenging the boards, performance, and the stock market (IZA Discussion Paper, 10239). Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2846330.

  47. Ferreira, D. (2015). Board diversity: Should we trust research to inform policy? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 108–111.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  48. Ferrero‐Ferrero, I., Fernández‐Izquierdo, M. Á., & Muñoz‐Torres, M. J. (2015). Integrating sustainability into corporate governance: An empirical study on board diversity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(4), 193–207.

  49. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder perspective. Pitman.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  50. Frias‐Aceituno, J. V., Rodriguez‐Ariza, L., & Garcia‐Sanchez, I. M. (2013). The role of the board in the dissemination of integrated corporate social reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 219–233.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  51. Furlotti, K., Mazza, T., Tibiletti, V., & Triani, S. (2018). Women in top positions on boards of directors: Gender policies disclosed in Italian sustainability reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 57–70.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  52. Galbreath, J. (2011). Are there gender‐related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(1), 17–38.

  53. García‐Sánchez, I.‐M., Martín‐Moreno, J., Akbar Khan, S., & Hussain, N. (2021). Socio‐emotional wealth and corporate responses to environmental hostility: Are family firms more stakeholder oriented? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, 1003–1018.

  54. Garcia‐Torea, N., Fernandez‐Feijoo, B., & de la Cuesta, M. (2016). Board of director's effectiveness and the stakeholder perspective of corporate governance: Do effective boards promote the interests of shareholders and stakeholders? BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(4), 246–260.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  55. Gómez‐Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez‐Nickel, M., & Jacobson, J. L. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family‐controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil Mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106–137.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  56. González, M., Guzmán, A., Pablo, E., & Trujillo, M. A. (2020). Does gender really matter in the boardroom? Evidence from closely held family firms. Review of Managerial Science, 14, 221–267.

  57. Greco, G., Ferramosca, S., & Allegrini, M. (2014). Exploring intellectual capital in family firms. An empirical investigation. International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 11(2), 91–103.

  58. Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 463–479.

  59. Handajani, L., Subroto, B., Sutrisno, T., & Saraswati, E. (2014). Does board diversity matter on corporate social disclosure? An Indonesian evidence. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 5(9), 8–16.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  60. Harjoto, M. A., Laksmana, I., & Lee, W. E. (2020). Female leadership in corporate social responsibility reporting: Effects on writing, readability and future social performance. Advances in Accounting, 49, 100475.

  61. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  62. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Board of directors as endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. Economic Policy Review, 9(1), 7–26.

  63. Hill, C., & Jones, T. (1992). Stakeholder‐agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29(2), 131–154.

  64. Hou, T. C.‐T. (2019). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and sustainable financial performance: Firm‐level evidence from Taiwan. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 19–28.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  65. Ibrahim, N. I. A., Howard, D. P., & Angelidis, J. P. (2003). Board members in the service industry: An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility orientation and directorial type. Journal of Business Ethics, 47(4), 393–401.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  66. Jain, T., & Jamali, D. (2016). Looking inside the black box: The effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(3), 253–273.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  67. Jensen, M. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.

  68. Jizi, M. (2017). The influence of board composition on sustainable development disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(5), 640–655.

  69. Jo, H., & Harjoto, M. A. (2011). Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(2), 351–383.

  70. Jouber, H. (2021). Is the effect of board diversity on CSR diverse? New insights from one‐tier vs two‐tier corporate board models, 21(1), 23–61.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  71. Kassinis, G., Panaviotou, A., Dimou, A., & Katsifaraki, G. (2016). Gender and environmental sustainability: A longitudinal analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(6), 399–412.

  72. Khatib, S. F. A., Abdullah, D. F., Elamer, A. A., & Abueid, R. (2021). Nudging toward diversity in the boardroom: A systematic literature review of board diversity of financial institutions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30, 985–1002.

  73. Kyaw, K., Olugbode, M., & Petracci, B. (2017). Can board gender diversity promote corporate social performance? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 17(5), 789–802.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  74. Labelle, R., Hafsi, T., Francoeur, C., & Ben Amar, W. (2018). Family firms' corporate social performance: A calculated quest for socioemotional wealth. Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 511–525.

  75. Lagasio, V., & Cucari, N. (2019). Corporate governance and environmental social governance disclosure: A meta‐analytical review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(4), 701–711.

  76. Landry, E. E., Bernardi, S. A., & Bosco, S. M. (2016). Recognition for sustained corporate social responsibility: Female directors make a difference. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(1), 27–36.

  77. Lepore, L., Paolone, F., & Cambrea, D. R. (2018). Ownership structure, investors' protection and corporate valuation: The effect of judicial system efficiency in family and non‐family firms. Journal of Management and Governance, 22, 829–862.

  78. Liao, L., Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee, and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409–424.

  79. Linciano, N., Ciavarella, A., Signoretti, R., Pierantoni, L., & Della Libera, E. (2019). Report on corporate governance of Italian listed companies, CONSOB Resource document. Retrieved from https://www.consob.it/web/consob-and-its-activities/rcg2019.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  80. Lipton, M., & Lorsch, J. W. (1992). A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The Business Lawyer, 48(1), 59–77.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  81. Lӧhde, A. S. K., Campopiano, G., & Calabrò, A. (2020). Beyond agency and stewardship theory: Shareholder–manager relationships and governance structures in family firms. Management Decision, 59(2), 390–405.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  82. Maglio, R., Ray, A., Agliata, F., & Lombardi, R. (2020). Connecting earnings management and corporate social responsibility: A renewed perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 1108–1116.

  83. Mallin, C. A., & Michelon, G. (2011). Board reputation attributes and corporate social performance: An empirical investigation of the US best corporate citizens. Accounting and Business Research, 41(2), 119–144.

  84. Markóczy, L., Li Sun, S., & Zhu, J. (2021). The glass pyramid: Informal gender status hierarchy on boards. Journal of Business Ethics, 168, 827–845.

  85. Mazzotta, R., & Veltri, S. (2014). The relationship between corporate governance and the cost of equity capital. Evidence from the Italian stock exchange. Journal of Management and Governance, 18(2), 419–448.

  86. Mazzotta, R., & Veltri, S. (2016). Does board composition affect intellectual capital efficiency? Evidence from the Italian context. European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 86, 30–46.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  87. Merendino, A., & Melville, R. (2019). The board of directors and firm performance: Empirical evidence from listed companies. Corporate Governance, 19(3), 508–551.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  88. Michelon, G., Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2013). Examining the link between strategic corporate social responsibility and company performance: An analysis of the best corporate citizens. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(2), 81–94.

  89. Murè, P., Spallone, M., Mango, F., Marzioni, S., & Bittucci, L. (2021). ESG and reputation: The case of sanctioned Italian banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 265–277.

  90. Myers, R. H. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  91. Nadeem, M., Gyapong, E., & Ahmed, A. (2020). Board gender diversity and environmental, social, and economic value creation: Does family ownership matter? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1268–1284.

  92. Nekhili, M., Chakroun, H., & Chtioui, T. (2018). Women's leadership and firm performance: Family versus nonfamily firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(2), 291–316.

  93. Nobes, C., & Parker, R. (2012). Comparative international accounting (twelve ed.). Edinburgh: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  94. Orazalin, N., & Baydauletov, M. (2020). Corporate social responsibility strategy and corporate environmental and social performance: The moderating role of board gender diversity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1664–1676.

  95. Ortas, E., Álvarez, I., & Zubeltzu, E. (2017). Firms' board independence and corporate social performance: A meta‐analysis. Sustainability, 9, 1006.

  96. Ortiz‐de‐Mandojana, N., & Aragon‐Correa, J. A. (2015). Boards and sustainability: The contingent influence of director interlocks on corporate environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 499–517.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  97. Patro, S., Zhang, L. Y., & Zhao, R. (2018). Director tenure and corporate social responsibility: The tradeoff between experience and independence. Journal of Business Research, 93, 51–66.

  98. Pérez‐Calero Sánchez, L., Guerrero‐Villegas, J., & Hurtado, G. J. M. (2017). The influence of organizational factors on board roles. Management Decision, 55(5), 842–871.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  99. Provasi, R., & Harasheh, M. (2021). Gender diversity and corporate performance: Emphasis on sustainability performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 127–137.

  100. Pucheta‐Martínez, M. C., & Gallego‐Álvarez, I. (2019). An international approach of the relationship between board attributes and the disclosure of corporate social responsibility issues. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 612–627.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  101. Pucheta‐Martínez, M. C., Gallego‐Álvarez, I., & Bel‐Oms, I. (2020). Cultural environments and the appointment of female directors on boards: An analysis from a global perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28, 555–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2065.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  102. Pugliese, A., Bezemer, P. J., Zattoni, A., Huse, M., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Volberda, H. W. (2009). Boards of directors' contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 292–306.

  103. Quinn, M., Hiebl, M., Mazzotta, R., & Veltri, S. (2020). Accounting for family and business overlaps. Journal of Management History, 26(2), 249–276.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  104. Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy, and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327–347.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  105. Rees, W., & Rodionova, T. (2015). The influence of family ownership on corporate social responsibility: An international analysis of publicly listed companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(3), 184–202.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  106. Rodriguez‐Ariza, L., Cuadrado‐Ballesteros, B., Martínez‐Ferrero, J., & Garcia‐Sánchez, I.‐M. (2017). The role of female directors in promoting CSR practices: An international comparison between family and non‐family business. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26(2), 162–174.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  107. Rossi, F., Cebula, R. J., & Barth, J. R. (2018). Female representation in the boardroom and firm debt: Empirical evidence from Italy. Journal of Economics and Finance, 42, 315–338.

  108. Rubino, F. E., Tenuta, P., & Cambrea, D. R. (2017). Board characteristics effects on performance in family and non‐family business: A multi‐theoretical approach. Journal of Management & Governance, 21(3), 623–658.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  109. Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review, 32, 549–572.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  110. Samara, G., & Berbegal‐Mirabent, J. (2018). Independent directors and family firm performance: Does one size fit all? The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14, 149–172.

  111. Scafarto, V., Ricci, F., Magnaghi, E., & Ferri, S. (2020). Board structure and intellectual capital efficiency: Does the family firm status matter? Journal of Management and Governance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-020-09533-x.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  112. Seierstad, C., Warner‐Søderholm, G., Torchia, M., & Huse, M. (2017). Increasing the number of women on boards: The role of actors and processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 141, 289–315.

  113. Setó‐Pamies, D. (2015). The relationship between women directors and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(6), 334–345.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  114. Shaukat, A., Qiu, Y., & Trojanowski, G. (2016). Board attributes, corporate social responsibility strategy, and corporate environmental and social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 569–585.

  115. Stanley, L. J., Hernández‐Linares, L., López‐Fernández, M. C., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2019). A typology of family firms: An investigation of entrepreneurial orientation and performance. Family Business Review, 32(2), 174–194.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  116. Surroca, J., & Tribo, J. A. (2008). Managerial entrenchment and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 35(5–6), 748–789.

  117. Tenuta, P., & Cambrea, D. R. (2019). Woman directors in Italian listed companies: A review of ten year experience. In S. Esposito De Falco, F. Alvino, N. Cucari, & L. Lepore (Eds.), Challenges and opportunities in Italian corporate governance (pp. 107–125). Virtus Interpress, chap. 5.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  118. Terjesen, S., Couto, E. B. & Francisco, P. M. (2016). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi‐country study of board diversity. Journal of Management and Governance, 20, 447–483.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now
  119. Tibiletti, V., Marchini, P. L., Furlotti, K., & Medioli, A. (2020). Does corporate governance matter in corporate social responsibility disclosure? Evidence from Italy in the “era of sustainability”. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2097.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  120. Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317.

  121. Velte, P. (2017). Do women on board of directors have an impact on corporate governance quality and firm performance? A literature review. International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management, 5(4), 302–346.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  122. Veltri, S., & Ferraro, O. (2018). Does other comprehensive income matter in credit‐oriented systems? Analyzing the Italian context. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 30, 18–31.

  123. Veltri, S., & Mazzotta, R. (2016). The association of board composition, intellectual capital and firm performance in a high ownership concentration context: Evidence from Italy. International Journal of Business and Management, 1(10), 317–331.

  124. Venturelli, A., Principale, S., Ligorio, L., & Cosma, S. (2021). Walking the talk in family firms. An empirical investigation of CSR communication and practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 497–510.

  125. Vieira, E. S. (2018). Board of directors' characteristics and performance in family firms and under the crisis. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 18(1), 119–142.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  126. Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417.

  127. Vitolla, F., Raimo, N., Marrone, A., & Rubino, M. (2020). The role of board of directors in intellectual capital disclosure after the advent of integrated reporting. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2188–2200.

  128. Wood, D. J. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 274, 50–84.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  129. Xie, J., Nozawa, W., & Managi, S. (2020). The role of women on boards in corporate environmental strategy and financial performance: A global outlook. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(5), 2044–2059.

  130. Yang, W., Yang, J., & Gao, Z. (2019). Do female board directors promote corporate social responsibility? An empirical study based on the critical mass theory. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(15), 3452–3471.

  131. Yasser, Q. R., Al Mamun, A., & Ahmed, I. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and gender diversity: Insights from Asia Pacific. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(3), 210–221.

  132. Ye, Y., & Li, K. (2021). Impact of family involvement on internal and external corporate social responsibilities: Evidence from Chinese publicly listed firms. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 352–365.

  133. Zhang, J. Q., Zhu, H., & Ding, H. (2013). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: An empirical investigation in the post Sarbanes‐Oxley era. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 381–392.

  134. Zhang, L. (2012). Board demographic diversity, independence, and corporate social performance. Corporate Governance, 12, 686–700.
    Paper not yet in RePEc: Add citation now

  135. Ziegler, A., & Schröder, M. (2010). What determines the inclusion in a sustainability stock index? A panel data analysis for European firms. Ecological Economics, 69(4), 848–856.

Cocites

Documents in RePEc which have cited the same bibliography

  1. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  2. .

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  3. Do Affiliated Bankers on Board Enhance Corporate Social Responsibility? US Evidence. (2021). HASAN, IFTEKHAR ; Li, Hui ; Zhu, Yun ; Wang, Haizhi.
    In: Sustainability.
    RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:6:p:3250-:d:517679.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  4. Taking the Lords Name in Vain: The Impact of Connected Directors on 19th century British Banks. (2015). Imai, Masami ; Grossman, Richard.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:10367.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  5. Management Board Composition of Banking Institutions and Bank Risk-Taking: The Case of the Czech Republic. (2015). Zigraiova, Diana.
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:cnb:wpaper:2015/14.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  6. Team Production, Gender Diversity, and Male Courtship Behavior. (2015). von Siemens, Ferdinand.
    In: CESifo Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:ces:ceswps:_5259.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  7. The effect of board directors from countries with different genetic diversity levels on corporate performance. (2015). Delis, Manthos D ; Pasiouras, Fotios ; Hasan, Iftekhar ; Gaganis, Chrysovalantis .
    In: Research Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:bof:bofrdp:urn:nbn:fi:bof-201508181353.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  8. Board Diversity and Financial Performance in the Top 500 Australian Firms. (2015). Mather, Paul ; Ahmed, Kamran ; Vafaei, Alireza .
    In: Australian Accounting Review.
    RePEc:bla:ausact:v:25:y:2015:i:4:p:413-427.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  9. Board of directors’ composition and financing choices. (2014). Alves, Paulo ; Couto, Eduardo ; Francisco, Paulo .
    In: MPRA Paper.
    RePEc:pra:mprapa:52973.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  10. EU Finance Ministers, Capital Markets and Fiscal Outcomes. (2014). Guedes, Maria ; Afonso, Antonio.
    In: Working Papers Department of Economics.
    RePEc:ise:isegwp:wp012014.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  11. Women on French Corporate Board of Directors- How Do They Differ from their Male Counterparts?. (2014). Bender, Anne-Franoise ; Dang, Rey ; Scotto, Marie-Jos .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ipg:wpaper:201413.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  12. Corporate Board Diversity and Financial Performance of Insurance Companies in Nigeria: An Application of Panel Data Approach. (2014). Abubakar, Bilkisu Aliyu ; Garba, Tukur .
    In: Asian Economic and Financial Review.
    RePEc:asi:aeafrj:2014:p:257-277.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  13. DO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS´ CHARACTERISTICS INFLUENCE FIRM´S PERFORMANCE? THE U.S. EVIDENCE. (2013). Spirollari, Persida .
    In: Prague Economic Papers.
    RePEc:prg:jnlpep:v:2013:y:2013:i:4:id:435:p:470-486.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  14. Why So Few Women on Boards of Directors? Empirical Evidence from Danish Companies 1997-2007. (2013). Smith, Nina ; Parrotta, Pierpaolo.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp7678.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  15. Female-Led Firms: Performance and Risk Attitudes. (2013). Smith, Nina ; Parrotta, Pierpaolo.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp7613.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  16. Changing the Corporate Elite? Not So Easy. Female Directors’ Appointments onto Corporate Boards. (2013). Oxelheim, Lars ; Randoy, Trond ; Thomsen, Steen.
    In: Working Paper Series.
    RePEc:hhs:iuiwop:0978.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  17. Independent Directors’ Dissent on Boards: Evidence from Listed Companies in China. (2013). Ma, Juan ; Khanna, Tarun.
    In: Harvard Business School Working Papers.
    RePEc:hbs:wpaper:13-089.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  18. Gender issues of financial analysts. (2013). Ge, Jingwen .
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:dumas-00934606.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  19. CEO gender, executive compensation and firm performance in Chinese‐listed enterprises. (2013). Vieito, João paulo ; McGuinness, Paul B. ; Lam, Kevin C. K., .
    In: Pacific-Basin Finance Journal.
    RePEc:eee:pacfin:v:21:y:2013:i:1:p:1136-1159.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  20. Women on corporate boards in Italy. (2013). Ciavarella, Angela ; Signoretti, Rossella ; Bianco, Magda .
    In: Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers).
    RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_174_13.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  21. Are Women Better Bankers to the Poor? Evidence from Rural Microfinance Institutions. (2013). Mersland, Roy ; Nadolnyak, Denis ; Hartarska, Valentina.
    In: 2014 Allied Social Sciences Association (ASSA) Annual Meeting, January 3-5, 2014, Philadelphia, PA.
    RePEc:ags:aaeass:161653.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  22. Executive board composition and bank risk taking. (2012). Schaeck, Klaus ; Kick, Thomas ; Berger, Allen N..
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:zbw:bubdps:032012.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  23. Do the Board of Directors´ Characteristics Influence Firm´s Performance? The U.S. Evidence. (2012). Horvath, Roman ; Spirollari, Persida .
    In: Prague Economic Papers.
    RePEc:prg:jnlpep:v:2012:y:2012:i:4:id:435:p:470-486.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  24. Does Corporate Governance Have an Effect on Performance in the European Banking Sector? Evidence from a Crisis Environment. (2012). Stepanova, Anastasia ; Ivantsova, Olga .
    In: HSE Working papers.
    RePEc:hig:wpaper:10/fe/2012.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  25. Does Gender Diversity in the Boardroom Improve Firm Performance?. (2012). Daunfeldt, Sven-Olov ; Rudholm, Niklas.
    In: HUI Working Papers.
    RePEc:hhs:huiwps:0060.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  26. DIVERSITÉ EN TERMES DE GENRE ET DE STATUT PROFESSIONNEL AU SEIN DES ORGANES DE DIRECTION ET GOUVERNANCE DES ENTREPRISES. (2012). Ben Ayed, Hanen Koubaa ; Michel, Sarah Saint .
    In: Post-Print.
    RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00937920.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  27. Do corporate boards matter during the current financial crisis?. (2012). Wu, Qiang ; HASAN, IFTEKHAR ; Francis, Bill B..
    In: Review of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:revfin:v:21:y:2012:i:2:p:39-52.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  28. Gender pairings and accountability effects. (2012). Garofalo, Orsola ; Brandts, Jordi.
    In: Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.
    RePEc:eee:jeborg:v:83:y:2012:i:1:p:31-41.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  29. Globalizing the boardroom—The effects of foreign directors on corporate governance and firm performance. (2012). masulis, ronald ; Wang, Cong ; Xie, Fei.
    In: Journal of Accounting and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jaecon:v:53:y:2012:i:3:p:527-554.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  30. Crisis, internal governance mechanisms and pension fund performance: Evidence from Poland. (2012). Kowalewski, Oskar ; Jackowicz, Krzysztof.
    In: Emerging Markets Review.
    RePEc:eee:ememar:v:13:y:2012:i:4:p:493-515.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  31. Is there a gender gap in CEO compensation?. (2012). Spiropoulos, Helen ; Matolcsy, Zoltan P. ; Bugeja, Martin.
    In: Journal of Corporate Finance.
    RePEc:eee:corfin:v:18:y:2012:i:4:p:849-859.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  32. Women on boards of directors: Why skirts in seats aren’t enough. (2012). Fitzsimmons, Stacey R..
    In: Business Horizons.
    RePEc:eee:bushor:v:55:y:2012:i:6:p:557-566.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  33. The Effects of Board Characteristics on Loan Covenants: An Empirical Analysis. (2012). Rutherford, Leann G. ; Chakravarty, Sugato .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:csr:wpaper:1014.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  34. What Do CEOs Do?. (2012). Sadun, Raffaella ; Prat, Andrea ; Guiso, Luigi ; bandiera, oriana.
    In: CEP Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp1145.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  35. The Role of Women in the Italian Network of Boards of Directors, 2003-2010. (2011). Santella, Paolo ; Ricciuti, Roberto ; Drago, Carlo ; Millo, Francesco ; Satella, Paolo .
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:ver:wpaper:10/2011.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  36. CEO and Board Characteristics as Determinants of Private Benefits of Control: Evidence from the Russian Stock Exchange. (2011). Муравьев, Александр ; Ilina, Yulia ; Berezinets, Irina ; Muravyev, Alexander.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp6256.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  37. Men among men do not take norm enforcement seriously. (2011). Muren, Astri ; Boschini, Anne ; Persson, Mats .
    In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics).
    RePEc:eee:soceco:v:40:y:2011:i:5:p:523-529.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  38. Gender differences in team work and team competition. (2011). Kübler, Dorothea ; Ivanova-Stenzel, Radosveta ; Kbler, Dorothea .
    In: Journal of Economic Psychology.
    RePEc:eee:joepsy:v:32:y:2011:i:5:p:797-808.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  39. Women in top management and agency costs. (2011). Jurkus, Anthony F. ; Woodard, Lorraine S. ; Park, Jung Chul.
    In: Journal of Business Research.
    RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:64:y:2011:i:2:p:180-186.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  40. Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices?. (2011). Gul, Ferdinand ; Ng, Anthony C. ; Srinidhi, Bin.
    In: Journal of Accounting and Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jaecon:v:51:y:2011:i:3:p:314-338.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  41. The Choice Of Trading Venue And Relative Price Impact Of Institutional Trading: Adrs Versus The Underlying Securities In Their Local Markets. (2011). Chakravarty, Sugato ; Rutherford, Leann G..
    In: Working Papers.
    RePEc:csr:wpaper:1011.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  42. What Do CEOs Do?. (2011). Sadun, Raffaella ; Prat, Andrea ; Guiso, Luigi ; bandiera, oriana.
    In: CEPR Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:8235.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  43. New Zealand Corporate Boards in Transition: Composition, Activity and Incentives Between 1995 and 2010. (2011). boyle, glenn ; Ji, XU.
    In: Working Papers in Economics.
    RePEc:cbt:econwp:11/36.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  44. CEO Gender and the Malt Brewing Industry: Return of the Beer Witch, Ale-Wife, and Brewster. (2010). Spitz, Janet .
    In: Forum for Social Economics.
    RePEc:spr:fosoec:v:39:y:2010:i:1:p:33-42.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  45. Working for Female Managers: Gender Hierarchy in the Workplace. (2010). Kwon, Illoong ; Milgrom, Eva Meyersson .
    In: Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:sip:dpaper:09-006.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  46. The value of independent directors: Evidence from sudden deaths. (2010). Nguyen, Bang Dang ; Nielsen, Kasper Meisner .
    In: Journal of Financial Economics.
    RePEc:eee:jfinec:v:98:y:2010:i:3:p:550-567.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  47. Unequal representation of women and men in energy company boards and management groups: Are there implications for mitigation?. (2010). Carlsson-Kanyama, A. ; Rohr, Ulrike ; Julia, Isabel Ripa .
    In: Energy Policy.
    RePEc:eee:enepol:v:38:y:2010:i:8:p:4737-4740.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  48. The effects of financial distress and capital structure on the work effort of outside directors. (2010). Yin, Xiangkang ; Li, Hui ; Chou, Hsin-I ; Chou, Hsin-I, .
    In: Journal of Empirical Finance.
    RePEc:eee:empfin:v:17:y:2010:i:3:p:300-312.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  49. Female Hires and the Success of Start-up Firms. (2009). Zulehner, Christine ; Weber, Andrea.
    In: NRN working papers.
    RePEc:jku:nrnwps:2009_28.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

  50. Female Hires and the Success of Start-up Firms. (2009). Zulehner, Christine ; Weber, Andrea.
    In: IZA Discussion Papers.
    RePEc:iza:izadps:dp4568.

    Full description at Econpapers || Download paper

Coauthors

Authors registered in RePEc who have wrote about the same topic

Report date: 2025-01-18 00:09:19 || Missing content? Let us know

CitEc is a RePEc service, providing citation data for Economics since 2001. Sponsored by INOMICS. Last updated October, 6 2023. Contact: CitEc Team.