Talk:Nazism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nazism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be polite, and welcoming to new users Assume good faith Do not attack other users For disputes, please see our guideline	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Please supply full citations when adding information, and consider tagging or removing unciteable information.

Daily article pageviews

Graphs do not work. You can go to the graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org.

" What The Heck"

I would like to say that this text is HIGHLY biased, I mean I am a communist but I am going to have to say that this is very harsh and one sided -

The race with the greatest ability to survive is the Aryan race, which is therefore superior. According to Nazism, inferior races need to be killed, especially Jews and the Roma.

Killed? that's a little extreme... you can not take Nazi Germany and manipulate it into propaganda, sure 6 million Jews died and many million homosexuals and roma died, but killed? Nazism, aka National Socialism is mainly about Nationalism, a term a disagree with but none the less, a nationalist wishes to preserve his land's traditional culture therefore accepting the traditional race as the master 'Aryan' race, this should not be confused with 'WPWW' or white power world wide, which is an internationalist white power movement, NAZISM, is an ideal which wishes to preserve ones land and culture and to love your country and the people of your land.

Please change this, as it is one sided, and therefore is not neutral. Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia for the masses to learn about history, views, ideas, etc and create their own opinion about the matter, not to learn about how something is 'Evil' and 'Inhumane'.

This unsigned comment was made by 203.10.110.144

I doubt anybody will read this (or take him seriously) but I will say it anyway. The article is supposed to be neutral. See Wikipedia:Neutral point of view for a discussion of the policy. It is not supposed to be one-sided in either. However, if you would like, you can edit the page to make things more neutral. Realize that other people (the masses around here) can and will revert your edits if they are too far from neutral. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:36, 26 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this another case where there needs to be a distibction between the party, and its ideology? - Please note that in 1926-1930, there were several other parties with very similar views. --Eptalon 15:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC) --Eptalon 15:27, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merging

I think this page needs to be merged with Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei or Nazi party, since they effectively cover the same topic, and since this is a wikipedia for those who do not speak english as a mother tongue or who are less mentally able, I do not see the need to have two different articles because the ideaology of Nazism is so directly linked to the Nazi Party.

Complex words

maybe words like "Fascist" should be explained briefly as well as being linked.

Slavs (although some Slavic people were considered to be Aryans) - wrong

All Slavs were considered to be Aryan

According to the Nazi "Ancestral Proof" all the "the non-Jewish members of all European Volk are Aryans".

The Nazi Ancestral Proof: Genealogy, Racial Science, and the Final Solution by Eric Ehrenreich, p.10 http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=5BvlGAEGAy0C&pg=PA10&dq=all+european+volk+are+aryan&hl=en&sa=X&ei=BCgGUtv1AYfl4QTbjIDgDQ&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=all%20european%20volk%20are%20aryan&f=false

From a purely racial standpoint all European peoples belonged to the Aryan family and were thus fundamentally "racially equivalent", and even according to German ethnology it was impossible to speak of a "Slavic race". The justification against the Slavs lay rather in the point of a "depopulation policy" of the East as Slavs and all non-Germans represented a major völkisch threat, as well as the Nazis struggle against Bolshevism.

Source: "Non-Germans" Under the Third Reich: The Nazi Judicial and Administrative by Diemut Majer, p.63 http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=J_BCNrHG9K8C&printsec=frontcover&dq=non-germans&hl=en&sa=X&ei=YSgGUubQHaKM4ATX5IHYDA&ved=0CDEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=racially%20equivalent&f=false

Please provide a source that shows the Nazis used the term "inferior races" to the Slavs or said they were not "Aryan".

The some Slavs you speak of that were considered Aryans were not Slavs but people of Germanic descent living in Slavic lands that were to be Germanised to become part of the Herrenvolk (master race), there is a difference between that and Aryan. All Europeans were regarded as Aryan.--82.37.71.91 (talk) 11:50, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Add template

Please add template: {{Authoritarian types of rule . Thanks. 89.8.175.174 (talk) 21:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]