Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr

518 US 470, 116 S. Ct. 2240, 135 L. Ed. 2d 700 - Supreme Court, 1996 - Google Scholar
… III devices may be marketed without the rigorous PMA review, such new devices, as well as all
new Class I and Class II devices, are subject to the requirements of § 360(k). That section …

In re Sheena K.

153 P. 3d 282, 55 Cal. Rptr. 3d 716, 40 Cal. 4th … - Cal: Supreme …, 2007 - Google Scholar
Sheena K., defendant, was convicted of misdemeanor battery and, pursuant to Welfare and Institutions
Code section 602, was adjudicated a ward of the juvenile court. In its disposition, the juvenile …

United States v. Valencia-Copete

792 F. 2d 4 - Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit, 1986 - Google Scholar
792 F.2d 4 (1986). UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Emiliano VALENCIA-COPETE,
Defendant, Appellant. No. 85-1674. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit …

Christiansburg Garment Co. v. EEOC

434 US 412, 98 S. Ct. 694, 54 L. Ed. 2d 648 - Supreme Court, 1978 - Google Scholar
… Section 706 (k) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 provides … A successful defendant seeking
counsel fees under § 706 (k) must rely on quite different equitable considerations …

Keating v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

848 F. 2d 271 - Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit, 1988 - Google Scholar
848 F.2d 271 (1988). Bruce W. KEATING, Sr., Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, Appellee. No. 87-1506 …

School Union No. 37 v. United Nat. Ins. Co.

617 F. 3d 554 - Court of Appeals, 1st Circuit, 2010 - Google Scholar
617 F.3d 554 (2010). SCHOOL UNION NO. 37, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. UNITED NATIONAL
INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, Appellee. No. 09-2040 …

Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.

552 US 312, 128 S. Ct. 999, 169 L. Ed. 2d 892 - Supreme Court, 2008 - Google Scholar
… 360c(f)(1)(A). The agency's review of devices for substantial equivalence is known as the §
510(k) process, named after the statutory provision describing the review …

MARTIN K. EBY CONST. v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit

369 F. 3d 464 - Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit, 2004 - Google Scholar
DART is a regional transportation authority created under Chapter 452 of the Texas Transportation
Code. See Williams v. Dallas Area Rapid Transit, 242 F.3d 315, 317 (5th Cir.2001); see also …

Kent K. v. Bobby M.

110 P. 3d 1013, 210 Ariz. 279 - Ariz: Supreme Court, 2005 - Google Scholar
¶ 1 Arizona statutes governing the termination of the parent-child relationship require the trial
court to make two findings before ordering severance of parental rights. The court first must find …

K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.

486 US 281, 108 S. Ct. 1811, 100 L. Ed. 2d 313 - Supreme Court, 1988 - Google Scholar
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for American Cyanamid Co. et al. by David
Ladd and Thomas W. Kirby; for the American Intellectual Property Law Association, Inc., by Neil …