Broberg v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America
171 Cal. App. 4th 912, 90 Cal. Rptr. 3d … - Cal: Court of Appeal, 2nd …, 2009 - Google Scholar
171 Cal.App.4th 912 (2009). 90 Cal.Rptr.3d 225. KIRK BROBERG, as Trustee, etc., et
al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE …
al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE …
Calfarm Ins. Co. v. Deukmejian
771 P. 2d 1247, 48 Cal. 3d 805, 258 Cal. Rptr … - Cal: Supreme …, 1989 - Google Scholar
… (§§ 1861.04-1861.10.). The initiative prohibits an insurer from declining to renew a policy except
for nonpayment of premium, fraud, or significant increase in the hazard insured against …
for nonpayment of premium, fraud, or significant increase in the hazard insured against …
Williamson v. Indianapolis Life Ins. Co.
741 So. 2d 1057 - Ala: Supreme Court, 1999 - Google Scholar
741 So.2d 1057 (1999). John R. WILLIAMSON v. INDIANAPOLIS LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY et al. 1970998. Supreme Court of Alabama. July 30, 1999 …
COMPANY et al. 1970998. Supreme Court of Alabama. July 30, 1999 …
Stringfellow v. State Farm Life Ins. Co.
743 So. 2d 439 - Ala: Supreme Court, 1999 - Google Scholar
743 So.2d 439 (1999). Michael A. STRINGFELLOW v. STATE FARM LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY and Charles E. Clark. 1980533. Supreme Court of Alabama. September 17, 1999 …
COMPANY and Charles E. Clark. 1980533. Supreme Court of Alabama. September 17, 1999 …
Jones v. Rosenberg
940 A. 2d 1109, 178 Md. App. 54, 178 Md … - Md: Court of Special …, 2008 - Google Scholar
… 16. Defendant violated contract law by not property disclosing Yield Spread Premium (fraud in
the factum), the Plaintiff was prevented from understanding the basic nature of the bargain …
the factum), the Plaintiff was prevented from understanding the basic nature of the bargain …
US v. Leahy
464 F. 3d 773 - Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit, 2006 - Google Scholar
… Leahy wanted the district court to admit a letter from a USF & G investigator to an FBI agent in
which the investigator stated that she found no premium fraud by Windy Labor …
which the investigator stated that she found no premium fraud by Windy Labor …
DeArman v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.
786 So. 2d 1090 - Ala: Supreme Court, 2000 - Google Scholar
786 So.2d 1090 (2000). Harry DeARMAN and Cherry DeArman v. LIBERTY NATIONAL LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY and Johnny Dollar. 1982252. Supreme Court of Alabama …
INSURANCE COMPANY and Johnny Dollar. 1982252. Supreme Court of Alabama …
Hinton ex rel. Hinton v. Monsanto Co.
813 So. 2d 827 - Ala: Supreme Court, 2001 - Google Scholar
… Co., 786 So.2d 1090 (Ala.2000) (insured's vanishing-premium fraud claim was not ripe until the
insured was required to pay premiums beyond the date the policy was to have become …
insured was required to pay premiums beyond the date the policy was to have become …
Dias v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co.
700 F. Supp. 2d 1204 - Dist. Court, ED California, 2010 - Google Scholar
… In a recent case involving "vanishing premium" fraud (Broberg), the California court of appeal
refused to dismiss a fraud claim because nothing in the policy language made reliance on …
refused to dismiss a fraud claim because nothing in the policy language made reliance on …
Bevans v. DEUTSCHE BANK NAT. TRUST CO.
281 SW 3d 740, 373 Ark. 105 - Ark: Supreme Court, 2008 - Google Scholar
… In-Lending Act, violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, violations of the Unfair
and Deceptive Trade Practices Act, common-law fraud, and Yield-Spread-Premium fraud …
and Deceptive Trade Practices Act, common-law fraud, and Yield-Spread-Premium fraud …