Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

WO2014094191A1 - Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission - Google Patents

Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2014094191A1
WO2014094191A1 PCT/CN2012/001716 CN2012001716W WO2014094191A1 WO 2014094191 A1 WO2014094191 A1 WO 2014094191A1 CN 2012001716 W CN2012001716 W CN 2012001716W WO 2014094191 A1 WO2014094191 A1 WO 2014094191A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
user equipments
category
cells
edge
center
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/CN2012/001716
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Kai Zhong
Feng Yang
Cheng Wang
Daqing Gu
Original Assignee
France Telecom
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by France Telecom filed Critical France Telecom
Priority to PCT/CN2012/001716 priority Critical patent/WO2014094191A1/en
Priority to PCT/IB2013/002940 priority patent/WO2014096950A2/en
Publication of WO2014094191A1 publication Critical patent/WO2014094191A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00Local resource management
    • H04W72/50Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources
    • H04W72/51Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on terminal or device properties
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00Local resource management
    • H04W72/50Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources
    • H04W72/54Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on quality criteria
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00Local resource management
    • H04W72/50Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources
    • H04W72/56Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on priority criteria
    • H04W72/566Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on priority criteria of the information or information source or recipient

Definitions

  • the field of the invention is the field of 4G LTE (Long Term Evolution
  • Coordinated multipoint transmission and reception aim to improve the system performance, the end user service quality and especially to achieve high data rates at the cell edges. This is achieved through a dynamic collaboration between access points at several locations to provide joint processing technology or coordinating scheduling/ coordinating beamforming technology (CS/CB).
  • CS/CB coordinating scheduling/ coordinating beamforming technology
  • a user equipment UE located at the edge of a cell can thereby be served by two or more access points to improve signals reception / transmission and increase throughput.
  • the techniques used for coordinated multipoint are different for the uplink and downlink. This results from the fact that the base stations are connected to each others in a network, whereas the user equipment are individual elements.
  • the downlink LTE CoMP requires dynamic coordination amongst several geographically separated base stations eNBs transmitting to the user equipment UE. It can be classified into two categories: (a) the joint processing schemes and (b) the Coordinated scheduling and or beamforming. a) Joint processing schemes for transmitting in the downlink
  • the data information transmitted to the user equipment is transmitted simultaneously from several base stations in a CoMP collaboration set. These multiple information is coherently or not- coherently merged to improve the received signal quality and strength and to inhibit interference from transmissions that are intended for other user equipment.
  • the three possible user equipment scheduling methods are the round-robin scheduling, the Max-C/I scheduling and the proportional fair scheduling.
  • the proportional fairness scheduling scheme is widely used. Compared with absolutely fair round-robin scheduling which does not consider the channel stateand with the Max-C/I scheduling,which ignores the fairness to maximize the throughput of the system, the proportional fairness scheduling chooses instantaneous user equipments in good condition or user equipments which have less weighted average throughput. It is not only able to take the spectral efficiency of the system into account but also the fairness between multi-user equipments.
  • the proportional fair algorithm considers the spectral efficiency and fairness but unfortunately, it does not take the diversities of the different types of traffic into account.
  • This scheme divides each cell's frequency band into two parts: one is the CoMP frequency zone which is reserved for cell-edge UEs employing CoMP SU-MIMO, and the other is non-CoMP frequency zone for cell-center UEs which are served by individual cell.
  • the present invention proposes a method of allocating adownlink frequency band in a coordinated multi-point system based on multi-cell joint signal processing, this method comprising:
  • said center user equipments being served independently and said edge user equipments being jointly served by said collaborative set , said method further comprising, at each transmission time interval :
  • the invention correspondingly provides a base station usable in a coordinated multi-point system based on multi-cell joint signal processing, said base station comprising a MAC scheduler comprising:
  • said center user equipments being served independently and said edge user equipments being jointly served by said collaborative set
  • said MAC scheduler further comprising:
  • the invention is applicable to the LTE downlink system with coordinated multi-point transmission with downlink QoS scheduling.
  • the dynamic algorithm of downlink frequency band allocation adjusts the frequency band allocation leading to the increase of the frequency band utilization.
  • the scheduling algorithm proposed in the invention fully accounts for both channel condition and traffic diversities.
  • the method comprises a step of adjusting said spectrum allocation for minimizing the number of user equipments having an unrealized demanded downlink transmission rate superior to a threshold.
  • This scheme dynamically adjusts the resource block allocation and utilizes the system spectrum resources effectively according to the feedback from the dissatisfaction degree of user equipments. It improves in particular the throughput of cell-edge user equipments.
  • the invention hereby provides a progressive way for adaptive spectrum division maximizing a defined user equipment satisfaction indicator.
  • the scheduler of the invention allocates appropriate frequency bands to the user equipments according to a user equipment's priority determined by this indicator
  • a static collaboration set division is used.
  • a dynamic collaboration set division can also be used.
  • the category of center user equipments comprises the user equipments having a channel quality indicator CQI superior to a threshold, the category of edge user equipments comprising the user equipments having said channel quality indicator lower than said threshold.
  • the percentage of frequency spectrum allocated dynamically to each category of user equipments corresponds to the percentage of user equipments in said category.
  • FIG. 1 shows a base station in accordance with the invention
  • FIG. 2 shows, in the form of a flow chart, the main steps of a method of frequency allocation in accordance with the invention
  • FIG. 3 shows a distribution of user equipment
  • Figure 1 shows a base station BS in accordance with the invention.
  • This base station BS comprises a MAC entity ME, which, in this specific embodiment, has the hardware architecture of a conventional computer.
  • it comprises a processor 11, a read/write memory 12 of the random access memory (RAM) type, and a read-only memory 13 having recorded therein a MAC scheduler MS computer program including instructions for executing the steps of the method represented by the flow chart shown in Figure 2.
  • Figure 2 represents in flow chart form the main steps of a particular embodiment of a method according to the invention.
  • the method of the invention consists in clustering the cells (step ElO) either statically or dynamically.
  • the user equipments are then classified into center user equipments and edge user equipments (step E20).
  • the system available downlink frequency bandwidth is divided according to the percentage of user equipments in each category (step E30). Then, a center user equipments scheduling in each cell and a centralized edge user equipments scheduling at the cluster level are performed in parallel (step E40). Finally, the spectrum allocation is adjusted to maximize the number of user equipments for which the demanded downlink transmission rate is realized (step E50).
  • the frequency allocation method of the invention comprises a step ElO of cell clustering for determining a collaboration set.
  • the method of the invention can use either a static clustering, where clustering is performed once, for examples based on field measurements and/or ray-launching simulations, or a dynamic clustering where measurements based on the received channel state information (CSI) are used to adapt clustering decisions over time.
  • a static clustering where clustering is performed once, for examples based on field measurements and/or ray-launching simulations
  • CSI channel state information
  • Step ElO is followed by a step E20 of classifying all the user equipments UE into center user equipments (CCU) and edge user equipments (CEU), the center user equipments being the user equipments UE having a channel quality indicator (CQI) superior or equal to a predefined threshold a, and edge user equipments, the user equipments with a channel quality indicator CQI lower than said threshold, the channel quality indicator CQI being estimated using the reference signal RS.
  • CCU center user equipments
  • CEU channel quality indicator
  • the classification step E20 is done on a per cell basis. It could be performed before step E10.
  • Step E20 (or step E10 if performed before step E10) is followed by a step E30 of dividing the downlink frequency band according to the percentage of center user equipments CCU and edge user equipments CEU.
  • B_EDGE B *
  • the frequency band division could be different from one collaborative cluster to another but the frequency band division must be the same for all the cells in a given collaborative cluster.
  • Step E30 is followed by a general step E40 of user equipment scheduling, which will be described in details.
  • the cell center user equipments are served independently, the edge user equipments being jointly served by the collaborative set.
  • Steps E41 and E42 relate to the center user equipment scheduling.
  • Step E41 is a step of calculating a priority factor PR for all the center user equipments in each cell.
  • Step E41 is a step of calculating a priority factor PR for all the center user equipments in each cell.
  • PFi means the priority of user equipment - a means the weight of the channel state
  • - R'i means the realized downlink transmission rate for user equipment i.
  • each cell sorts the center user equipments allocates the downlink Physical Resource Bloc PRB.
  • Table 1 below gives an example of center user equipments sorting for the three cells CELL_1, CELL2, CELL 3 of figure 3.
  • Steps E43 and E44 relate to the edge user equipment scheduling.
  • Step E43 is a step of calculating a priority factor PFi for all the edge user equipments in each cell.
  • step E43 is similar to step E41 of calculating a priority factor for center user equipments.
  • Vi - R'i combine means the data rate realized by joint transmission.
  • the edge user equipments are sorted in a centralized manner by the collaborative cluster.
  • Table 2 below gives an example of edge user equipments sorting for the collaborative cluster CC_1 of figure 3.
  • Figure 4 represents the result of the step E40 of user equipment scheduling applied to the distribution of Figure 3. It can be seen that all the three cells CELL_1, CELL2, CELL_3 allocate the same downlink frequency band and perform downlink CoMP joint transmission for each group of edge user equipments ⁇ UE11 ⁇ , ⁇ UE15 ⁇ and ⁇ UE12, UE14 ⁇ .
  • step E40 there may be some vacant frequency bands may after step E40 is completed.
  • Step E40 is followed by a step E50 of adjusting spectrum allocation based on the dissatisfaction degree of user equipment, after a sufficient number of time transmission intervals ⁇ .
  • this step E50 consists in adjusting said spectrum allocation for minimizing the number of user equipments having an unrealized demanded downlink transmission rate ⁇ superior to a threshold y t h- This step E50 enables to further adjust the spectrum division based on the knowledge of frequency usage and realization of user equipments' demand for data delivery.
  • the user equipments fall into two categories, the category of satisfied user equipments if ⁇ and the category of the dissatisfied user equipments if ⁇ > Yttv yth being a threshold.
  • Step E52 is a step of adjusting coarsely the frequency band, this step consisting in allocating vacant frequency bands to dissatisfied user equipments. More precisely, vacant non-CoMP bands are totally moved to CoMP band and then distributed to dissatisfied edge users (CEU) or vacant CoMP bands are totally moved to non-CoMP band and the distributed to dissatisfied center users.
  • CEU dissatisfied edge users
  • the vertical line BVB of Figure 5a represents the border between the used bands and the vacant bands within the Non CoMP band after step E40 is completed, before coarse adjustment. More precisely, VBl, VB2 and VB3 represent the vacant bands in cells CELL_1, CELL_2 and CELL_3.
  • the vacant band VBl which is the smallest band among VBl, VB23 and VB3 is moved to the CoMP zone to form a bigger one.
  • Figure 5b illustrates the result of this coarse adjustment step, CELL_2 and CELL_3 having vacant bands VB2 and VB3 in their Non CoMP band.
  • the whole vacant bands are allocated to either CEU or CCU in order to satisfy as many user equipments as possible.
  • Step E54 is a step of adjusting finely the frequency band if:
  • the step E54 consists of several iterations, in each one of which the scheduler moves N physical resource blocks PRB from one category where all users are satisfied to the other category where at least one user is not satisfied.
  • Figure 5c illustrates the fine adjustment step and the result thereof.
  • the step E54 of fine adjustment stops when one user equipment in the original satisfy category becomes unsatisfied, iey > y th , after a certain iteration.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

This method of allocating a downlink frequency band in a coordinated multi-point system based on multi-cell joint signal processing,this method comprises: - a step (E10) of clustering said cells for determining at least a collaborative set of cells; and - a step (E20) of classifying the user equipments in said cells in a category of center user equipments (CCU) or in a category of edge user equipments (CEU); said center user equipments being served independently and said edge user equipments being jointly served by said collaborative set of cells, said method further comprising, at each transmission time interval: - a step (E30) of dynamically allocating to each category ( CCU,CEU) part of the downlink frequency spectrum available for said system according to the number of user equipments in each category; - a step (E40) of scheduling the physical resource block a11ocated to said user equipments in their respective frequency band according to a priority (PFi) taking into account a channel state (Hi) and a traffic condition (Vi, Ri) of said user equipments.

Description

Method and Apparatus for Coordinated Multipoint Transmission
Background of the invention The field of the invention is the field of 4G LTE (Long Term
Evolution) networks, and more particularly the field of 4G LTE Coordinated Multipoint (CoMP) transmission and reception technology.
Coordinated multipoint transmission and reception aim to improve the system performance, the end user service quality and especially to achieve high data rates at the cell edges. This is achieved through a dynamic collaboration between access points at several locations to provide joint processing technology or coordinating scheduling/ coordinating beamforming technology (CS/CB).
A user equipment UE located at the edge of a cell can thereby be served by two or more access points to improve signals reception / transmission and increase throughput.
The techniques used for coordinated multipointare different for the uplink and downlink. This results from the fact that the base stations are connected to each others in a network, whereas the user equipment are individual elements.
The downlink LTE CoMP requires dynamic coordination amongst several geographically separated base stations eNBs transmitting to the user equipment UE. It can be classified into two categories: (a) the joint processing schemes and (b) the Coordinated scheduling and or beamforming. a) Joint processing schemes for transmitting in the downlink
The data information transmitted to the user equipment is transmitted simultaneously from several base stations in a CoMP collaboration set. These multiple information is coherently or not- coherently merged to improve the received signal quality and strength and to inhibit interference from transmissions that are intended for other user equipment.
b) Coordinated scheduling and or beamforming: Using this concept, data to singleuser equipment is transmitted from one base station. The scheduling decisions and beams are coordinated to control the interference that may be generated.
The three possible user equipment scheduling methods are the round-robin scheduling, the Max-C/I scheduling and the proportional fair scheduling.
The proportional fairness scheduling scheme is widely used. Compared with absolutely fair round-robin scheduling which does not consider the channel stateand with the Max-C/I scheduling,which ignores the fairness to maximize the throughput of the system, the proportional fairness scheduling chooses instantaneous user equipments in good condition or user equipments which have less weighted average throughput. It is not only able to take the spectral efficiency of the system into account but also the fairness between multi-user equipments.
The proportional fair algorithm considers the spectral efficiency and fairness but unfortunately, it does not take the diversities of the different types of traffic into account.
Frequency resource division and allocation
With respect to frequency resource division and allocation in the downlink cellular network, both fixed and flexible schemes were introduced.
In "Discussion of CoMP SU-MIMO", Samsung, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #56, Rl-090613, Feb. 2009, a fixed resource allocation scheme based on CoMP SU-MIMO was presented (coordinated multi-point transmission for single-user equipment multi-input multi-output).
This scheme divides each cell's frequency band into two parts: one is the CoMP frequency zone which is reserved for cell-edge UEs employing CoMP SU-MIMO, and the other is non-CoMP frequency zone for cell-center UEs which are served by individual cell.
The central frequency and bandwidth of CoMP frequency zones are the same for each cell;thisspectrum division scheme is thereforefixed and static. This scheme suffers from throughput loss due to the lack of flexibility between different cells.
To improve the system performance, "Further discussion of frequency plan scheme on CoMP-SU-MIMO", Potevio, 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #56bis, Rl-091415, Mar. 2009and "Sub-carrier allocation combined with coordinated multi-point transmission in multi-cell OFDMA system"Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Network Infrastructure and Digital Content, IEEE Press, 6-8 Nov. 2009, pp.842-846 by XingkunXu, Tao Qiuet al. proposed so called flexible frequency allocation plan (FFAP) schemes, where each sector in one cell has an identical CoMP frequency zone that is allocated according to the proportion of cell-edge UE in its cluster.
However, once there is a frequency zone partition, some of the resources must be assigned to a fixed transmission mode. This scheme lacks flexibility and it causes a performance loss of the system.
As a summary, the existing CoMP transmission schemes, which adopt fixed spectrum division strategies for cell-edge and cell-center user equipments, suffer from uneven distribution and low utilization of resources.
Object and summary of the invention The present invention proposes a method of allocating adownlink frequency band in a coordinated multi-point system based on multi-cell joint signal processing, this method comprising:
- a step of clustering said cells for determining at least a collaborative set; and
- a step of classifying the user equipments in said cells in a category of center user equipments or in a category of edge user equipments ;
said center user equipments being served independently and said edge user equipments being jointly served by said collaborative set , said method further comprising, at each transmission time interval :
- a step of dynamically allocating to each category part of the downlink frequency spectrum available for said system according to the number of user equipments in each category ; and
- a step of scheduling the physical resource blocks allocated to said user equipments in their respective frequency band according to a priority taking into account a channel state and a traffic condition of said user equipments. The invention correspondingly provides a base station usable in a coordinated multi-point system based on multi-cell joint signal processing, said base station comprising a MAC scheduler comprising:
- a module for clustering said cells for determining at least a collaborative set; and
- a module for classifying the user equipments in said cells in a category of center user equipments or in a category of edge user equipments;
said center user equipments being served independently and said edge user equipments being jointly served by said collaborative set , said MAC scheduler further comprising:
- a module for dynamically allocating to each category, at each transmission time interval, part of the downlink frequency spectrum available for said system according to the number of user equipments in each category ; and
- a module for scheduling the physical resource block allocated to said user equipments in their respective frequency band according to a priority taking into account a channel state and a traffic condition of said user equipments.
The invention is applicable to the LTE downlink system with coordinated multi-point transmission with downlink QoS scheduling.
The dynamic algorithm of downlink frequency band allocation adjusts the frequency band allocation leading to the increase of the frequency band utilization.
Besides, the scheduling algorithm proposed in the invention fully accounts for both channel condition and traffic diversities.
In one particular embodiment of the invention, the method comprises a step of adjusting said spectrum allocation for minimizing the number of user equipments having an unrealized demanded downlink transmission rate superior to a threshold.
This scheme dynamically adjusts the resource block allocation and utilizes the system spectrum resources effectively according to the feedback from the dissatisfaction degree of user equipments. It improves in particular the throughput of cell-edge user equipments.
The invention hereby provides a progressive way for adaptive spectrum division maximizing a defined user equipment satisfaction indicator. The scheduler of the invention allocates appropriate frequency bands to the user equipments according to a user equipment's priority determined by this indicator
After several rounds adjustment, near-optimal spectrum allocation for cell-edge and cell-center user equipments can be reached, and most user equipments can be satisfied, whatever the traffic they bear.
In a particular embodiment of the invention, a static collaboration set division is used. A dynamic collaboration set division can also be used.
In a particular embodiment of the invention, the category of center user equipments comprises the user equipments having a channel quality indicator CQI superior to a threshold, the category of edge user equipments comprising the user equipments having said channel quality indicator lower than said threshold.
In a particular embodiment of the invention, the percentage of frequency spectrum allocated dynamically to each category of user equipments corresponds to the percentage of user equipments in said category.
Brief description of the drawings
Other characteristics and advantages of the present invention appear from the following description made with reference to the accompanying drawings that show an embodiment without any limiting character. In the figures:
- Figure 1 shows a base station in accordance with the invention;
- Figure 2 shows, in the form of a flow chart, the main steps of a method of frequency allocation in accordance with the invention;
- Figure 3 shows a distribution of user equipment;
- Figure 4 shows the result of scheduling applied to the distribution of Figure 3; and
- Figure 5a to Scillustrate an example of a coarse and of a fine adjustments steps in accordance with the invention.
Detailed description of an embodiment of the invention Figure 1 shows a base station BS in accordance with the invention.
This base station BS comprises a MAC entity ME, which, in this specific embodiment, has the hardware architecture of a conventional computer. In particular, it comprises a processor 11, a read/write memory 12 of the random access memory (RAM) type, and a read-only memory 13 having recorded therein a MAC scheduler MS computer program including instructions for executing the steps of the method represented by the flow chart shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2 represents in flow chart form the main steps of a particular embodiment of a method according to the invention.
As a general overview, the method of the invention consists in clustering the cells (step ElO) either statically or dynamically. The user equipments are then classified into center user equipments and edge user equipments (step E20).
At any transmission time interval ΤΠ, the system available downlink frequency bandwidth is divided according to the percentage of user equipments in each category (step E30). Then, a center user equipments scheduling in each cell and a centralized edge user equipments scheduling at the cluster level are performed in parallel (step E40). Finally, the spectrum allocation is adjusted to maximize the number of user equipments for which the demanded downlink transmission rate is realized (step E50).
In this embodiment, the frequency allocation method of the invention comprises a step ElO of cell clustering for determining a collaboration set.
The method of the invention can use either a static clustering, where clustering is performed once, for examples based on field measurements and/or ray-launching simulations, or a dynamic clustering where measurements based on the received channel state information (CSI) are used to adapt clustering decisions over time.
Step ElO is followed by a step E20 of classifying all the user equipments UE into center user equipments (CCU) and edge user equipments (CEU), the center user equipments being the user equipments UE having a channel quality indicator (CQI) superior or equal to a predefined threshold a, and edge user equipments, the user equipments with a channel quality indicator CQI lower than said threshold, the channel quality indicator CQI being estimated using the reference signal RS. For example, in the distribution of Figure 3, user equipment UE1- UE10 could be classified in the CCU category (center user equipments) and user equipment UE11-UE15 in the CEU category (edge user equipments).
The classification step E20 is done on a per cell basis. It could be performed before step E10.
Step E20 (or step E10 if performed before step E10) is followed by a step E30 of dividing the downlink frequency band according to the percentage of center user equipments CCU and edge user equipments CEU.
B_EDGE = B * |CEU | / ( |CCU| + |CEU |) ;
B_CENTER = B - B_EDGE,
Where:
- B means the systemavailable frequency bandwidth;
- B_EDGE, the frequency band allocated for edge user equipments;
- B_CENTER, the frequency band allocated for center user equipments;
- |CEU |, the total number of edge user equipments; and
- |CCU| , the total number of center user equipments.
The frequency band division could be different from one collaborative cluster to another but the frequency band division must be the same for all the cells in a given collaborative cluster.
Step E30 is followed by a general step E40 of user equipment scheduling, which will be described in details.
In the invention, the cell center user equipments are served independently, the edge user equipments being jointly served by the collaborative set.
Steps E41 and E42 relate to the center user equipment scheduling.
Step E41 is a step of calculating a priority factor PR for all the center user equipments in each cell. In this embodiment,
PFi = - b. with a + b = l
Figure imgf000009_0001
Where:
- PFi means the priority of user equipment - a means the weight of the channel state;
- b means the weight of the satisfaction of the user equipment;
- I Hi 12 means the norm of the channel state matrix of user equipment!;
- Vi means the demanded downlink transmission rate for user equipment i;
- R'i means the realized downlink transmission rate for user equipment i.
In a particular embodiment, =
Figure imgf000010_0001
for the N*M matrix H,.
At step E42, each cell sorts the center user equipments allocates the downlink Physical Resource Bloc PRB.
Table 1 below gives an example of center user equipments sorting for the three cells CELL_1, CELL2, CELL 3 of figure 3.
Figure imgf000010_0003
Table 1
Steps E43 and E44 relate to the edge user equipment scheduling.
Step E43 is a step of calculating a priority factor PFi for all the edge user equipments in each cell. In this embodiment, step E43 is similar to step E41 of calculating a priority factor for center user equipments.
Figure imgf000010_0002
Where:
- Hi combine means the composite channel from the Base Station defining the cluster; and
- (Vi - R'i) combine means the data rate realized by joint transmission.
At step E44, the edge user equipments are sorted in a centralized manner by the collaborative cluster. Table 2 below gives an example of edge user equipments sorting for the collaborative cluster CC_1 of figure 3.
Figure imgf000011_0001
Table 2
Figure 4 represents the result of the step E40 of user equipment scheduling applied to the distribution of Figure 3. It can be seen that all the three cells CELL_1, CELL2, CELL_3 allocate the same downlink frequency band and perform downlink CoMP joint transmission for each group of edge user equipments {UE11}, {UE15} and {UE12, UE14}.
In some configurations, there may be some vacant frequency bands may after step E40 is completed.
Step E40 is followed by a step E50 of adjusting spectrum allocation based on the dissatisfaction degree of user equipment, after a sufficient number of time transmission intervals ΤΠ.
In a specific embodiment, this step E50 consists in adjusting said spectrum allocation for minimizing the number of user equipments having an unrealized demanded downlink transmission rate γ superior to a threshold yth- This step E50 enables to further adjust the spectrum division based on the knowledge of frequency usage and realization of user equipments' demand for data delivery.
In this embodiment, we use an indicator γ representative of a dissatisfaction degree, defined as follows at step E51:
Y = Vi - R'i
According to the value of the dissatisfaction degree γ, the user equipments fall into two categories, the category of satisfied user equipments if γ<γ^ and the category of the dissatisfied user equipments if γ > Yttv yth being a threshold.
Step E52 is a step of adjusting coarsely the frequency band, this step consisting in allocating vacant frequency bands to dissatisfied user equipments. More precisely, vacant non-CoMP bands are totally moved to CoMP band and then distributed to dissatisfied edge users (CEU) or vacant CoMP bands are totally moved to non-CoMP band and the distributed to dissatisfied center users.
One example of coarse adjustment is described in reference to Figures 5a and 5b. The vertical line BVB of Figure 5a represents the border between the used bands and the vacant bands within the Non CoMP band after step E40 is completed, before coarse adjustment. More precisely, VBl, VB2 and VB3 represent the vacant bands in cells CELL_1, CELL_2 and CELL_3.
At step E52, the vacant band VBl, which is the smallest band among VBl, VB23 and VB3 is moved to the CoMP zone to form a bigger one. Figure 5b illustrates the result of this coarse adjustment step, CELL_2 and CELL_3 having vacant bands VB2 and VB3 in their Non CoMP band.
In the described embodiment, the whole vacant bands are allocated to either CEU or CCU in order to satisfy as many user equipments as possible.
Step E54 is a step of adjusting finely the frequency band if:
- No vacant bands are available
- All user equipments in a category are satisfied, i.e. their satisfaction degree γ<γ^ ;
- User equipments in the other category need more frequency band, since at least one of them is dissatisfied, i.e. their satisfaction degree γ > yth ;
The step E54 consists of several iterations, in each one of which the scheduler moves N physical resource blocks PRB from one category where all users are satisfied to the other category where at least one user is not satisfied. Figure 5c illustrates the fine adjustment step and the result thereof. The step E54 of fine adjustment stops when one user equipment in the original satisfy category becomes unsatisfied, iey > yth, after a certain iteration.

Claims

1. A method of allocating a downlink frequency band in a coordinated multi-point system based on multi-cell joint signal processing, this method comprising:
- a step (E10) of clustering said cells for determining at least a collaborative set of cells; and
- a step (E20) of classifying the user equipments in said cells in a category of center user equipments (CCU) or in a category of edge user equipments (CEU);
said center user equipments being served independently and said edge user equipments being jointly served by said collaborative set of cells, said method further comprising, at each transmission time interval :
- a step (E30) of dynamically allocating to each category (CCU, CEU) part of the downlink frequency spectrum available for said system according to the number of user equipments in each category ;
- a step (E40) of scheduling the physical resource block allocated to said user equipments in their respective frequency band according to a priority (PFi) taking into account a channel state (Hi) and a traffic condition (Vi, R'i) of said user equipments.
2. A method according to Claim 1 comprising a step (E50) of adjusting said spectrum allocation for minimizing the number of user equipments having an unrealized demanded downlink transmission rate (γ) superior to a threshold (yth).
3. A method according to Claim 1 or 2 characterized in that a static collaboration set division is used in said clustering step.
4. A method according to any one of Claims 1 to 3 characterized in that said category of center user equipments comprises the user equipments having a channel quality indicator (CQI) superior to a threshold (a), the category of edge user equipments comprising the user equipments having said channel quality indicator lower than said threshold (a).
5. A method according to any one of Claims 1 to 4, characterized in that the percentage of frequency spectrum allocated dynamically (E30) to each of said categories corresponds to the percentage of user equipments in each category.
6. A method according to any one of Claims 1 to 5 in which said priority (PFi) is defined as follows:
PFi = - b> with a + b = l
Figure imgf000014_0001
Where:
- PFi means the priority of user equipment i
- a means the weight of the channel state;
- b means the weight of the satisfaction of the user equipment;
- I Hi 12 means the channel state matrix of user equipment i;
- Vi means the demanded downlink transmission rate for user equipment i;
- R'i means the realized downlink transmission rate for user equipment i.
7. A base station usable in a coordinated multi-point system based on multi-cell joint signal processing, said base station comprising a scheduler comprising:
- amodule for clustering said cells for determining at least a collaborative set of cells; and
- a module for classifying the user equipments in said cells in a category of center user equipments (CCU) or in a category of edge user equipments
(CEU);
said center user equipments being served independently and said edge user equipments being jointly served by said collaborative set of cells, said scheduler further comprising:
- a module for dynamically allocating to each category (CCU, CEU), at each transmission time interval, part of the downlink frequency spectrum available for said system according to the number of user equipments in each category ; and - a module for scheduling the physical resource block allocated to said user equipments in their respective frequency band according to a priority (PFi) taking into account a channel state (Hi) and a traffic condition (Vi, R'i) of said user equipments.
PCT/CN2012/001716 2012-12-21 2012-12-21 Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission WO2014094191A1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/CN2012/001716 WO2014094191A1 (en) 2012-12-21 2012-12-21 Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission
PCT/IB2013/002940 WO2014096950A2 (en) 2012-12-21 2013-12-16 Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/CN2012/001716 WO2014094191A1 (en) 2012-12-21 2012-12-21 Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2014094191A1 true WO2014094191A1 (en) 2014-06-26

Family

ID=50391213

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/CN2012/001716 WO2014094191A1 (en) 2012-12-21 2012-12-21 Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission
PCT/IB2013/002940 WO2014096950A2 (en) 2012-12-21 2013-12-16 Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2013/002940 WO2014096950A2 (en) 2012-12-21 2013-12-16 Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (2) WO2014094191A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107454675A (en) * 2016-05-31 2017-12-08 北京信威通信技术股份有限公司 The resource allocation methods and device of a kind of trunked communication system
US10158463B1 (en) 2015-03-17 2018-12-18 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Method and system for coordinated transmission with use of neighboring base station scheduling policy
CN110677175A (en) * 2019-09-23 2020-01-10 浙江理工大学 Sub-channel scheduling and power distribution joint optimization method based on non-orthogonal multiple access system

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN107682870B (en) * 2017-09-19 2019-11-26 西安电子科技大学 Edge customer and central user division methods in LTE channeling
CN113473623B (en) * 2021-06-30 2023-12-15 中通服咨询设计研究院有限公司 Frequency multiplexing system and method for ensuring user rate based on 5G millimeter waves

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102098737A (en) * 2009-12-11 2011-06-15 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Cell priority level based cooperation scheduling method and system
WO2012093742A1 (en) * 2011-01-04 2012-07-12 Pantech Co.,Ltd. Terminal and base station, method thereof in wireless communication system
CN102647212A (en) * 2011-02-15 2012-08-22 宏达国际电子股份有限公司 Coordinated multi-point communications system and methods for controlling coordinated multi-point transmission and reception
US20120281556A1 (en) * 2011-05-02 2012-11-08 Motorola Mobility, Inc. Multi-cell coordinated transmissions in wireless communication network

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101752921B1 (en) * 2011-01-12 2017-07-03 삼성전자주식회사 Multi-cell cooperative transmission method and apparatus

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN102098737A (en) * 2009-12-11 2011-06-15 中兴通讯股份有限公司 Cell priority level based cooperation scheduling method and system
WO2012093742A1 (en) * 2011-01-04 2012-07-12 Pantech Co.,Ltd. Terminal and base station, method thereof in wireless communication system
CN102647212A (en) * 2011-02-15 2012-08-22 宏达国际电子股份有限公司 Coordinated multi-point communications system and methods for controlling coordinated multi-point transmission and reception
US20120281556A1 (en) * 2011-05-02 2012-11-08 Motorola Mobility, Inc. Multi-cell coordinated transmissions in wireless communication network

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
QUALCOMM EUROPE: "Coordinated Multi-Point downlink transmission in LTE-Advanced", 3GPPTSG RANWG1 #55, RL-084400, 10 November 2008 (2008-11-10) *

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US10158463B1 (en) 2015-03-17 2018-12-18 Sprint Spectrum L.P. Method and system for coordinated transmission with use of neighboring base station scheduling policy
CN107454675A (en) * 2016-05-31 2017-12-08 北京信威通信技术股份有限公司 The resource allocation methods and device of a kind of trunked communication system
CN107454675B (en) * 2016-05-31 2020-04-24 北京信威通信技术股份有限公司 Resource allocation method and device of trunking communication system
CN110677175A (en) * 2019-09-23 2020-01-10 浙江理工大学 Sub-channel scheduling and power distribution joint optimization method based on non-orthogonal multiple access system
CN110677175B (en) * 2019-09-23 2023-04-14 浙江理工大学 Sub-channel scheduling and power distribution joint optimization method

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2014096950A3 (en) 2014-08-28
WO2014096950A2 (en) 2014-06-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11489559B2 (en) Scheduling multi-user MIMO transmissions in fixed wireless access systems
US8078185B2 (en) User group-based adaptive soft frequency reuse method to mitigate downlink interference for wireless cellular networks
JP5436237B2 (en) Method for allocating resources in an OFDMA network
KR101229322B1 (en) Interference coordination method and access network device
JP5697622B2 (en) Mobile communication system and remote radio unit clustering method thereof
US8964867B2 (en) LTE scheduling
US8638746B2 (en) Method and apparatus for the joint design and operation of scheduling and transmission for downlink multi-user MIMO with reciprocity-based training
US9253788B2 (en) Resource allocation method and apparatus of base station in wireless communication system
US10123326B2 (en) Method and apparatus for resource allocation and for scheduling cellular and coordinated multipoint transmissions in heterogeneous wireless networks
WO2017101458A1 (en) Resource allocation realization method and system, and centralized controller and base station
CN107846266B (en) Time-frequency resource space division scheduling method and device
EP3183932B1 (en) Method and apparatus for determining clusters of access nodes
WO2014096950A2 (en) Method and apparatus for coordinated multipoint transmission
Boccardi et al. Network MIMO with reduced backhaul requirements by MAC coordination
KR20150008988A (en) Apparatus and method for formating virtual cell in a virtual cell network system
CN105517178B (en) A kind of dispatching method of adjustable low complex degree wireless resource scheduling device
Zubow et al. sGSA: An SDMA-OFDMA scheduling solution
Chayon et al. Downlink Radio Resource Management Through CoMP and Carrier Aggregation for LTE-Advanced Network
CN103079215A (en) Multi-cell combined optimization method on basis of sector fairness
Falconetti et al. Codebook based inter-cell interference coordination for LTE
Tsai et al. Downlink radio resource allocation with Carrier Aggregation in MIMO LTE-advanced systems
Özbek et al. Feedback strategies for multicell systems
Klockar et al. User-centric pre-selection and scheduling for coordinated multipoint systems
Martin-Sacristan et al. Time-frequency coupled proportional fair scheduler with multicarrier awareness for LTE downlink
Ghaleb et al. On the extension of traditional resource allocation algorithms in LTE-A to joint UL-DL scheduling with FDD carrier aggregation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 12890344

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 12890344

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1