Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

WO2006038017A2 - An apparatus and a method for processing hard material using a laser having an irradiance in the range 10 '6 to 10 '9 w/cm'2 and a repetition rate in the range 10 to 50 khz - Google Patents

An apparatus and a method for processing hard material using a laser having an irradiance in the range 10 '6 to 10 '9 w/cm'2 and a repetition rate in the range 10 to 50 khz Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2006038017A2
WO2006038017A2 PCT/GB2005/003855 GB2005003855W WO2006038017A2 WO 2006038017 A2 WO2006038017 A2 WO 2006038017A2 GB 2005003855 W GB2005003855 W GB 2005003855W WO 2006038017 A2 WO2006038017 A2 WO 2006038017A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
range
irradiance
khz
cutting
pcd
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/GB2005/003855
Other languages
French (fr)
Other versions
WO2006038017A3 (en
Inventor
Jozef Wendland
Paul Harrison
Matthew Henry
Original Assignee
Powerlase Limited
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from GB0422318A external-priority patent/GB0422318D0/en
Priority claimed from GB0511966A external-priority patent/GB0511966D0/en
Application filed by Powerlase Limited filed Critical Powerlase Limited
Priority to JP2007535239A priority Critical patent/JP2008515643A/en
Priority to EP05790890A priority patent/EP1802421A2/en
Publication of WO2006038017A2 publication Critical patent/WO2006038017A2/en
Publication of WO2006038017A3 publication Critical patent/WO2006038017A3/en

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K26/00Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
    • B23K26/14Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring using a fluid stream, e.g. a jet of gas, in conjunction with the laser beam; Nozzles therefor
    • B23K26/142Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring using a fluid stream, e.g. a jet of gas, in conjunction with the laser beam; Nozzles therefor for the removal of by-products
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K26/00Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
    • B23K26/02Positioning or observing the workpiece, e.g. with respect to the point of impact; Aligning, aiming or focusing the laser beam
    • B23K26/06Shaping the laser beam, e.g. by masks or multi-focusing
    • B23K26/064Shaping the laser beam, e.g. by masks or multi-focusing by means of optical elements, e.g. lenses, mirrors or prisms
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K26/00Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
    • B23K26/02Positioning or observing the workpiece, e.g. with respect to the point of impact; Aligning, aiming or focusing the laser beam
    • B23K26/06Shaping the laser beam, e.g. by masks or multi-focusing
    • B23K26/064Shaping the laser beam, e.g. by masks or multi-focusing by means of optical elements, e.g. lenses, mirrors or prisms
    • B23K26/0648Shaping the laser beam, e.g. by masks or multi-focusing by means of optical elements, e.g. lenses, mirrors or prisms comprising lenses
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K26/00Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
    • B23K26/02Positioning or observing the workpiece, e.g. with respect to the point of impact; Aligning, aiming or focusing the laser beam
    • B23K26/06Shaping the laser beam, e.g. by masks or multi-focusing
    • B23K26/0665Shaping the laser beam, e.g. by masks or multi-focusing by beam condensation on the workpiece, e.g. for focusing
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K26/00Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
    • B23K26/12Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring in a special atmosphere, e.g. in an enclosure
    • B23K26/123Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring in a special atmosphere, e.g. in an enclosure in an atmosphere of particular gases
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K26/00Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
    • B23K26/36Removing material
    • B23K26/40Removing material taking account of the properties of the material involved
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K2101/00Articles made by soldering, welding or cutting
    • B23K2101/002Drill-bits
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K2101/00Articles made by soldering, welding or cutting
    • B23K2101/34Coated articles, e.g. plated or painted; Surface treated articles
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23KSOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
    • B23K2103/00Materials to be soldered, welded or cut
    • B23K2103/50Inorganic material, e.g. metals, not provided for in B23K2103/02 – B23K2103/26

Definitions

  • An Apparatus for Processing Hard Material The invention relates to an apparatus for processing hard material.
  • PCD polycrystalline diamond
  • WC Tungsten Carbide
  • PCD cutting tools are typically used to process non-ferrous metals, wood and rubber.
  • the PCD blanks are cut to shape and brazed into individual holders which are assembled into a cutting tool, often with multiple PCD cutting teeth per tool.
  • Polycrystalline diamond cutting tool blanks can be regarded as a composite material that combines the hardness, abrasion, resistance and thermal conductivity of diamond with the toughness of WC.
  • PCD is a synthetic, extremely tough, intergrown mass of randomly orientated diamond particles in a metal matrix. It is produced by sintering together selected diamond particles at high pressure and temperature. The sintering process is rigidly controlled within the diamond stable region and an extremely hard and abrasion resistant structure is produced.
  • a further proposed approach is the use of lasers to cut diamonds.
  • a conventional technique comprises the use of a flash pumped solid state laser
  • Flash lamp pumped solid state lasers have been widely used in industry for over twenty years operating at a few hundred hertz with millisecond pulse durations providing high power output but low power density
  • Fig. 1 is a schematic block diagram showing a laser milling apparatus
  • Fig. 2 is a cut-away perspective view of a PCD composite
  • Fig. 3 is a graph of removal rate against laser beam pulse irradiance for PCD at a range of puls e repetition rates ;
  • Fig. 4 is a graph of removal rate against pulse irradiance for tungsten carbide for a range of repetition rates
  • Fig. 5 is a schematic block diagram showing a laser cutting apparatus
  • Fig. 6 is a diagram of PCD cut depth against test duration for a range of pulse repetition rates
  • Fig. 7 is a perspective view of a laser milling application; and Fig. 8 is a side view of a PCDAVC composite and cutting nozzle.
  • the process can be applied to material having a hardness greater than 250 kg.mm " (Vickers Hardness scale), more preferably greater than 500 kg.mm 2 , more preferably still greater than 1000 kg.mm 2 .
  • WC has a hardness 1730 kg.mm 2 and PCD a hardness 5098 kg.mm 2 .
  • the invention relates to a laser configured to process hard material such as natural diamond, PCD and WC using a pulsed laser at very high repetition rates and irradiance.
  • hard material such as natural diamond, PCD and WC
  • PDSSL diode pumped solid state laser
  • a laser 10 generates a pulsed beam which is directed by mirrors 12, 14 through an optics array 16, 18 comprising a telescope (beam expander) to a scanner 20 for traversing the beam across a target for example a PCD material to be milled.
  • the beam passes through shaping or clipping apertures or irises 24, 26, 28, 30.
  • an alignment laser 32 for example a HeNe alignment laser generates an alignment beam which is co-axial with the pulsed beam via mirrors 34, 36.
  • the mirror 36 lies in the pulsed laser beam path but is removable once alignment has been carried out.
  • Iris 23 is used in conjunction with the HeNe alignment beam to aid alignment using back reflections.
  • the laser milling approach uses a Starlase AO2 Nd: YAG Q-switched DPSSL at the fundamental wavelength of 1064 nm available from Powerlase Limited, Crawley, West Wales.
  • This pulsed laser offers average powers up to 220 W at a range of repetition rates and pulse durations between 3 to 50 kHz and 20 to 200 ns respectively.
  • the output beam power is varied using any appropriate attenuator unit (not shown) and then collimated with a Galilean telescope 16, 18 and directed into a galvanometric scanner 20 (ScanLab HurryScan25 available from Scanlab GmbH, Kunststoff, Germany).
  • the scanner is fitted with an 80 mm focal length f-theta telecentric objective lens with a working target area of 25x25 mm.
  • AU of the processing work is performed in air at standard atmospheric conditions and no gas assist is used.
  • the system is first aligned using the alignment laser 32 and the removable mirror 36 is removed.
  • the pulsed laser 10 is then activated and carries out an operational cycle as described in more detail below.
  • the pulsed beam is scanned across the target via scanner 20.
  • the scanner 20 can be understood in more detail from Fig. 7 in which the scanner includes steering mirrors 50, 52 and a flat-field lens 54.
  • the scanner includes steering mirrors 50, 52 and a flat-field lens 54.
  • overlapped laser pulses are provided allowing any desired complex milled shape.
  • the scanning speeds are determined as a function of the laser repetition rate and the amount of laser pulse spatial overlap.
  • the amount of pulse overlap is used to control the amount of "heat" that any particular section of the target receives; when a pulse hits the target the material will heat up and some material will be vaporised, and after the pulse the target begins to cool down.
  • the laser may be used to mill (and as discussed in more detail below, cut) a material such as that shown in Fig. 2 which includes a layer of PCD 200 upon a substrate of WC 210 to form a composite 220 with an edge 230 to be cut/milled and a taper angle ⁇ 240.
  • the laser cutting and milling process must produce and maintain a cut that enables the PCD to be used as a cutting tool.
  • Fig 2 shows the required sharp edge 230 on the diamond side of the PCD material. This edge must be very straight and have as small a radius as possible. The sharp cutting edge is only required on the cutting face 250 and not on the other sides of the PCD part.
  • the preferred irradiance range is 10 7 to 10 9 Wcm "2 , more preferably 100 MWcm "2 to 200 MWcm "2
  • the preferred pulse duration is 47 ns to 160 ns, more preferably 120 ns to 160 ns
  • the preferred repetition rate is in the range 10 kHz (47 ns) to 50 kHz (160 ns), more preferably 40 kHz
  • Fig. 3 shows in more detail the removal rate achieved against irradiance for a range of repetition rates from 10 to 50 kHz.
  • the ranges of parameters described above provide especially good performance results. This is because of the physical mechanism that takes place during laser milling in which the laser pulse provides a first melting stage where the surface of the work piece is raised to the vaporisation temperature followed by a material removal stage where vaporisation occurs in a controlled manner.
  • the laser pulse must be sufficiently powerful (i.e. have enough irradiance) and have sufficient duration to raise the material temperature above the melting point and up to the vaporisation point (near the boiling point) of the material. From this point in the duration of the pulse there is vaporisation and material is removed from the target in a controlled manner.
  • the governing parameters for removing material by ablation are the irradiance or power density of the pulse and the pulse duration.
  • pulse duration is directly linked to the laser repetition rate; at high repetition rates the pulse length is long and at low repetition rates the pulse length is shorter and so in the embodiment described the range of repetition rates described above forms a governing parameter by virtue of the direct relationship to pulse duration.
  • the pulse duration itself can be appropriately controlled separately from the laser repetition rate to achieve the desired working conditions.
  • irradiance rather than merely pulse energy arises because the pulse energy must be concentrated in a short duration pulse - on the order of nanoseconds - in order to reduce conductance losses into the bulk of the target material which would leave less energy for actually processing and can indeed cause liquid melt pools to form.
  • PCD it is found that irradiance levels below the lower limit of the above specified range have little effect on the material other than to melt it such that there is limited removal of material.
  • the upper limit of pulse irradiance is governed by plasma absorption effects which block the delivery beam to the target (laser induced absorption waves, LAW).
  • the pulse duration increases whilst the irradiance and pulse energy decrease such that the maximum repetition rate limit is governed by the lower threshold of irradiance.
  • the lower limit on the pulse repetition rate is also governed by the onset of LAW as the laser pulse irradiance increases at lower repetition rates until an absorbing plasma is produced as discussed above.
  • a further factor needs to be taken into account namely that as the repetition rate of the laser is decreased, the pulse duration decreases and the irradiance increases. The material removal per pulse will increase as the irradiance increases (because the material will reach the vaporisation temperature more quickly) but the pulse duration is reduced so this increased removal rate works for less time.
  • the preferred range for irradiance is 10 8 Wcm “2 to 10 9 Wcm "2 , more preferably 500 to 700 MWcm "2 for pulse duration 47 ns to 160 ns more preferably 120 ns to 160 ns and repetition rate 10 to 50 kHz (47 to 160 ns), more preferably 10-3O kHz and the highest removal rates occur in the 10- 20 kHz (47 to 63 ns) range.
  • the pulse irradiance is low, and in many cases the vaporisation temperature for WC is not reached within the pulse duration. Only the maximum pulse irradiance reaches the material removal stage. In fact the removal rate generally drops to zero at 50 kHz repetition rate - the pulse irradiance is insufficient for the material to reach its vaporisation temperature, so there is no vaporisation and therefore no material removal. This means that the minimum pulse irradiance boundary condition is not reached. Only at lower repetition rates is material removed where the pulse irradiance level is high enough to reach the vaporisation temperature within the duration of the pulse. For example, for the 30 kHz case, whilst the pulse durations are shorter, the pulse irradiance is much higher and the material removal stage is reached more quickly within the duration of the pulse.
  • the laser output power may be the same. This means that by maintaining the laser output power and by changing other laser parameters a great deal of improvement to the material removal rate can be made.
  • Fig. 5 shows a laser cutting apparatus of similar nature to that shown in Fig. 1, like reference numerals relating to like parts.
  • the principal difference is the provision of a gas assisting cutting head 40.
  • the laser piercing and cutting approach uses the higher power Starlase AO4 Nd: YAG Q-switched DPSSL at the fundamental wavelength of 1064 nm available from Powerlase Limited, Crawley, West Hampshire..
  • This pulsed laser offers average powers up to 420 W at a range of repetition rates and pulse durations between 3 to 50 kHz and 20 to 200 ns respectively.
  • the output beam power is varied using an attenuator unit, collimated with a Galilean telescope 16, 18 and then directed by mirror 42 into an Anorad XYZ motion stage 11, available from Anorad UK, Rockwell Automation, Basingstoke, UK. This stage moves the target in the XY directions and the focussing head in the Z direction.
  • the Anorad system is granite mounted and has linear drives capable of a top speed of 2 m/s with an accuracy of +/-1 ⁇ m over an XY travel of 450 x 450 mm.
  • the laser beam is focus sed with a variety of lenses 46 of focal length 100 mm to 2O3 mm for example a lens of focal length 149 mm producing at best focus a 200 ⁇ m diameter spot.
  • the cutting head 40 allows a co-axial gas jet 48 to be used to assist the cutting process which can be compressed air, oxygen or nitrogen and can be supplied to the work-piece at pressures up to 10 Bar.
  • the cutting technique adopted comprises reactive fusion cutting, known as "melt burn and blow", in which a laser beam creates a melt pool and a co-axial gas jet blows the liquid out of the bottom of the cut, the gas jet reacting exothermically with the molten material, adding another heat source to the process and accelerating the creation of the melt pool and hence the cutting speed.
  • This approach provides excellent perpendicular edge quality using either oxygen or air as the gas jet.
  • the pierce-through phase occurs at the start of a cut-line where a percussion drilled hole is made. For most of this operation the hole is blind and the debris from the drilling operation is thrown up out of the hole entrance, resulting in an area of dross on the material surface around the hole.
  • the Cutting phase follows the pierce-through. The laser cutting head is moved over the material at a constant speed and the material is cut in a single pass. An angled cut front is established and this is where the laser beam is absorbed. The laser beam is waveguided through the thickness of the material.
  • the preferred pulse repetition rate is the range 10 to 50 kHz or more preferably 40 to 50 kHz and the pulse duration is preferably 30 to 200 ns, more preferably 100 to 200 ns.
  • the average laser power 300 W to 1 kW, more preferably 350 to 400 W and the irradiance is preferably in the range 10 6 to 10 s Wcm "2 , more preferably of the order of magnitude 100 MW cm "2 and most preferably 110 MWcm "2 (piercing) 118 MWcm 2 (cutting).
  • the preferred assist gas pressure is in the region 1 to 10 Bar, more preferably 8 Bar. Referring to Fig. 6 the relationship between PCD depth and test duration during piercing is shown for a range of repetition rates.
  • HAZ Heat Affected Zones
  • the preferred range for irradiance is 10 to 10 Wcm "" most preferably 120 MWcm " , more preferably 100 to 200 MWcm "2 , repetition rate 40 to 50 kHz, most preferably 45 Hz, pulse duration 41 ns to 200 ns, more preferably 155 ns to 200 ns, pulse energy 6.7 mJ and oxygen gas assist at 8 Bar. These values are preferred for direct WC cutting as well.
  • the removal of the striations reduces degradation of the straightness of the cutting edge.
  • Non formation of dross ensures that there is reduced interference ⁇ vith the brazing process by which the PCD cutting tools are mounted in to a holder prior to use which can otherwise result in a weaker joint.
  • Removal of a step or discontinuity at the PCD-WC interface removes a weakness at the interface between the materials which can be a source of premature failure of the cutting tool. It is further noted that although some striation is still present but the other layer is dross free, the striations assist the brazing process by providing a larger surface area for the brazing process to adhere to.
  • the range of parameters provide surprisingly good operation " because the high irradiance, high repetition rate laser pulses produce molten and vaporised WC for the oxygen to react with.
  • This burning reaction proceeds outwards from the laser focal spot in all directions, causing striations until the turning reaction moves too far away from its fuel source (the focussed laser beam and co-axial gas jet). By that time the laser cutting head has moved to a. fresh section of PCD where the burning process starts again. As the cutting speed is increased to that of the "burning reaction" speed, there is a decrease in striation formation.
  • the pulse irradiance used in the successful cutting trials (118 MWcm "2 ) is just above the threshold for WC removal by vaporisation, as shov ⁇ n in Fig. 4. It is believed that the cutting process is being enhanced by this vaporisation, with the oxygen assist gas reacting directly with the WC vapour rather than the melt. This could lead to a much more exothermic reaction which would result in faster cutting.
  • the cutting process is applied in multiple passes, for example first and second passes, where each may use, for example, the settings described above, with the PCD layer uppermost/closest to the cutting nozzle.
  • first pass is used to cut through the PCD
  • second pass is used to increase the quality of the PCD cutting edge.
  • dynamic focus changes between the different passes is used to provide improved results.
  • the focus position may be located within the WC layer as described above.
  • the focus can be moved up to the uppermost surface of the PCD. It is found that this approach in particular increases the quality of the PCD cutting edge. It is also possible to move the focus position for the second pass to an alternative location within either the WC layer or the PCD layer.
  • a negative taper may be formed on the cutting edge of the material so that the leading cutting edge overhangs the lower edge as shown. in Fig. 8.
  • a cutting nozzle designated very generally 70 is provided near a PCD/WC layered composite 76 with the PCD layer 72 uppermost and closest to the nozzle.
  • the leading cutting edge 74 off the PCD layer overhangs the WC layer such that a negative taper designated generally ⁇ is created.
  • changing the focus position fronx a point designated generally X, half way through the WC layer to a point designated generally Y, at the upper surface of the PCD layer can help with the production of a negative taper.
  • the amount of taper will vary with the specifics of the PCD and the material that the PCD will be used to process (wood, copper, aluminium, etc).
  • the taper angle is typically 7 degrees and not normally greater than 15 degrees,
  • DPSSLs Much higher energy intensities are now possible with DPSSLs and the nanosecond-kilohertz regime of operation greatly improves many challenging laser materials processing applications.
  • the short pulses diminish thermal effects and improve process quality, while higher fluences improve material coupling and process efficiency.
  • DPSSLs also offer a combination of good beam quality, high efficiency, rugged construction and long diode lifetime. This allows manufacturing on both the macro and micro scale. Laser cutting of PCD is possible with DPSS lasers at much higher cutting speeds than alternative technologies.
  • a laser cutting rate of 24 mm/minute is achieved which is four times faster than the corresponding rate using EDM. Yet further the use of the laser and scanner stage allows omnidirectional cutting.
  • Laminate structures can be cut using the technique such that PCD and WC disks achieve a cut quality of the same quality as EDM and better than for FPSS.
  • Such laminate structures include Syndite TM available from deBeers and single layer or composite structures with thicknesses preferably in the range 0.5 mm to 3.2 mm, for example composite structures of thickness 1.6, 2.0 or 3.2 mm with 0.5 mm PCD on a WC substrate.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Plasma & Fusion (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Laser Beam Processing (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to an apparatus and to a method for processing hard materials comprises a laser (10) which generates high repetition rate, high irradiance laser pulses which are scanned onto a material using a scanner (20) for laser milling or laser cutting applications.

Description

An Apparatus for Processing Hard Material The invention relates to an apparatus for processing hard material.
There axe numerous industrial uses of super hard materials such as polycrystalline diamond (PCD), natural diamond and Tungsten Carbide (WC). These include tooling for mechanical processing as well as robust substrates for microelectronics in extreme environment applications. Processing these materials is however problematic.
PCD cutting tools are typically used to process non-ferrous metals, wood and rubber. The PCD blanks are cut to shape and brazed into individual holders which are assembled into a cutting tool, often with multiple PCD cutting teeth per tool. Polycrystalline diamond cutting tool blanks can be regarded as a composite material that combines the hardness, abrasion, resistance and thermal conductivity of diamond with the toughness of WC. PCD is a synthetic, extremely tough, intergrown mass of randomly orientated diamond particles in a metal matrix. It is produced by sintering together selected diamond particles at high pressure and temperature. The sintering process is rigidly controlled within the diamond stable region and an extremely hard and abrasion resistant structure is produced. These properties are best utilised in cutting tools for machining a wide variety of materials as well as in wear part applications, where they contribute to improved tool lifetime and offer additional technological advantages such as process reliability and more accurate machining tolerances.
However during the life of the tool the cutting edges wear down (although at a slower rate than traditional cutting tools), which necessitates sharpening of the cutting edges of the PCD teeth. If this is not done then dimensional tolerances are increased and cutting quality is lowered. One known solution for extending the life of PCD cutting tools comprises electro discharge machining (EDM) in which a wire electrode cuts a diamond by means of spark erosion. A problem with this known solution is that it is low speed and able only to cut simple shapes. Other known conventional techniques suffer from problems such as the requirement for lubricant and excessive tool wear.
Yet a further proposed approach is the use of lasers to cut diamonds. A conventional technique comprises the use of a flash pumped solid state laser
(FPSSL). Flash lamp pumped solid state lasers (FPSSLs) have been widely used in industry for over twenty years operating at a few hundred hertz with millisecond pulse durations providing high power output but low power density
(irradiance). However this arrangement suffers from the problem of low poΛver and efficiency.
The invention is set out in the claims.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the figures, of which:
Fig. 1 is a schematic block diagram showing a laser milling apparatus; Fig. 2 is a cut-away perspective view of a PCD composite; Fig. 3 is a graph of removal rate against laser beam pulse irradiance for PCD at a range of puls e repetition rates ;
Fig. 4 is a graph of removal rate against pulse irradiance for tungsten carbide for a range of repetition rates;
Fig. 5 is a schematic block diagram showing a laser cutting apparatus; Fig. 6 is a diagram of PCD cut depth against test duration for a range of pulse repetition rates;
Fig. 7 is a perspective view of a laser milling application; and Fig. 8 is a side view of a PCDAVC composite and cutting nozzle.
For example the process can be applied to material having a hardness greater than 250 kg.mm" (Vickers Hardness scale), more preferably greater than 500 kg.mm2, more preferably still greater than 1000 kg.mm2. In particular WC has a hardness 1730 kg.mm2 and PCD a hardness 5098 kg.mm2.
In overview the invention relates to a laser configured to process hard material such as natural diamond, PCD and WC using a pulsed laser at very high repetition rates and irradiance. In particular ranges of parameter values have been identified with surprisingly effective operation. As discussed in more detail below it is found that in one embodiment a diode pumped solid state laser (DPSSL) can provide the desired performance.
Two specific processing applications for the apparatus are described below, cutting the initial tool shape and maintaining the tool sharpness.
An apparatus for shaping or milling a hard material is shown in Fig. 1. A laser 10 generates a pulsed beam which is directed by mirrors 12, 14 through an optics array 16, 18 comprising a telescope (beam expander) to a scanner 20 for traversing the beam across a target for example a PCD material to be milled. The beam passes through shaping or clipping apertures or irises 24, 26, 28, 30. In addition an alignment laser 32 for example a HeNe alignment laser generates an alignment beam which is co-axial with the pulsed beam via mirrors 34, 36. The mirror 36 lies in the pulsed laser beam path but is removable once alignment has been carried out. Iris 23 is used in conjunction with the HeNe alignment beam to aid alignment using back reflections.
The laser milling approach uses a Starlase AO2 Nd: YAG Q-switched DPSSL at the fundamental wavelength of 1064 nm available from Powerlase Limited, Crawley, West Sussex. This pulsed laser offers average powers up to 220 W at a range of repetition rates and pulse durations between 3 to 50 kHz and 20 to 200 ns respectively. The output beam power is varied using any appropriate attenuator unit (not shown) and then collimated with a Galilean telescope 16, 18 and directed into a galvanometric scanner 20 (ScanLab HurryScan25 available from Scanlab GmbH, Munich, Germany). The scanner is fitted with an 80 mm focal length f-theta telecentric objective lens with a working target area of 25x25 mm. AU of the processing work is performed in air at standard atmospheric conditions and no gas assist is used.
In operation the system is first aligned using the alignment laser 32 and the removable mirror 36 is removed. The pulsed laser 10 is then activated and carries out an operational cycle as described in more detail below. The pulsed beam is scanned across the target via scanner 20.
The scanner 20 can be understood in more detail from Fig. 7 in which the scanner includes steering mirrors 50, 52 and a flat-field lens 54. As can be seen from the inset 56, as a result of scanning the pulsed beam, overlapped laser pulses are provided allowing any desired complex milled shape. The scanning speeds are determined as a function of the laser repetition rate and the amount of laser pulse spatial overlap. The amount of pulse overlap is used to control the amount of "heat" that any particular section of the target receives; when a pulse hits the target the material will heat up and some material will be vaporised, and after the pulse the target begins to cool down. Whilst this cooling process is happening, the next pulse arrives and where there is an overlap the material reaches the point of vaporisation more quickly than for the initial pulse (because the material temperature after the first pulse was higher than ambient) so there is more of the laser pulse available for vaporisation. However, there is a limit to this process - if there is too much residual heat energy left (stored) in the target, it will become a liquid and a melt pool is formed which is much less controllable and therefore undesirable in the milling process. Furthermore, carefully controlling the overlap allows control of the quality of the material surface after the milling process has finished - higher overlaps tend to give better smoother finishes. Accordingly an appropriate scan rate can be determined by experimentation for a given set up to achieve the desired level of milling.
The specific operational parameters selected are described herein in relation to two specific materials, PCD and WC. For example the laser may be used to mill (and as discussed in more detail below, cut) a material such as that shown in Fig. 2 which includes a layer of PCD 200 upon a substrate of WC 210 to form a composite 220 with an edge 230 to be cut/milled and a taper angle Θ240. The laser cutting and milling process must produce and maintain a cut that enables the PCD to be used as a cutting tool. Fig 2 shows the required sharp edge 230 on the diamond side of the PCD material. This edge must be very straight and have as small a radius as possible. The sharp cutting edge is only required on the cutting face 250 and not on the other sides of the PCD part.
The exact operational parameters are material dependent and rely on factors such as thermal conductivity, density, heat capacity, vaporisation temperature, specific heat of vaporisation and reflectivity of target surface, and preferred ranges of specific materials as discussed below. In the case of milling PCD the preferred irradiance range is 107 to 109 Wcm"2, more preferably 100 MWcm"2 to 200 MWcm"2, the preferred pulse duration is 47 ns to 160 ns, more preferably 120 ns to 160 ns, the preferred repetition rate is in the range 10 kHz (47 ns) to 50 kHz (160 ns), more preferably 40 kHz
(120 ns) to 50 kHz (160 ns), and a removal rate of up to 9 mm3/min is achieved using the specific laser apparatus described above although higher removal rates are possible with higher power lasers. Fig. 3 shows in more detail the removal rate achieved against irradiance for a range of repetition rates from 10 to 50 kHz.
Surprisingly the ranges of parameters described above provide especially good performance results. This is because of the physical mechanism that takes place during laser milling in which the laser pulse provides a first melting stage where the surface of the work piece is raised to the vaporisation temperature followed by a material removal stage where vaporisation occurs in a controlled manner. In particular the laser pulse must be sufficiently powerful (i.e. have enough irradiance) and have sufficient duration to raise the material temperature above the melting point and up to the vaporisation point (near the boiling point) of the material. From this point in the duration of the pulse there is vaporisation and material is removed from the target in a controlled manner.
As a result the governing parameters for removing material by ablation are the irradiance or power density of the pulse and the pulse duration. In some cases pulse duration is directly linked to the laser repetition rate; at high repetition rates the pulse length is long and at low repetition rates the pulse length is shorter and so in the embodiment described the range of repetition rates described above forms a governing parameter by virtue of the direct relationship to pulse duration. However, in other embodiments the pulse duration itself can be appropriately controlled separately from the laser repetition rate to achieve the desired working conditions.
The importance of irradiance rather than merely pulse energy arises because the pulse energy must be concentrated in a short duration pulse - on the order of nanoseconds - in order to reduce conductance losses into the bulk of the target material which would leave less energy for actually processing and can indeed cause liquid melt pools to form. In the case of PCD, it is found that irradiance levels below the lower limit of the above specified range have little effect on the material other than to melt it such that there is limited removal of material. Conversely the upper limit of pulse irradiance is governed by plasma absorption effects which block the delivery beam to the target (laser induced absorption waves, LAW).
Similarly, as the laser repetition rate is increased the pulse duration increases whilst the irradiance and pulse energy decrease such that the maximum repetition rate limit is governed by the lower threshold of irradiance. Similarly again the lower limit on the pulse repetition rate is also governed by the onset of LAW as the laser pulse irradiance increases at lower repetition rates until an absorbing plasma is produced as discussed above. However a further factor needs to be taken into account namely that as the repetition rate of the laser is decreased, the pulse duration decreases and the irradiance increases. The material removal per pulse will increase as the irradiance increases (because the material will reach the vaporisation temperature more quickly) but the pulse duration is reduced so this increased removal rate works for less time. In addition, as the repetition rate is decreased, although the amount removed per pulse is higher there will be less pulses so the overall removal may not be higher. Accordingly higher repetition rates are found to be the dominant factor producing the fastest rate of removal of PCD. It is also found that the base of the milled area becomes smoother as the laser repetition rate is increased. This result determines the best laser milling conditions and shows that a high power nanosecond-kilohertz operating regime is effective for milling PCD.
Turning to WC, lower removal rates are achieved than for PCD. Lower frequency repetition rates (which have high pulse irradiance) produce higher removal rates - whereas the highest repetition rate of 50 kHz cannot be used in some cases for ablation at the available pulse irradiances since there is no material removal at all. Referring to Fig. 4 the relationship between pulse irradiance and removal rate is shown for a range of different repetition rates. Surprisingly the preferred range for irradiance is 108 Wcm"2 to 109 Wcm"2, more preferably 500 to 700 MWcm"2 for pulse duration 47 ns to 160 ns more preferably 120 ns to 160 ns and repetition rate 10 to 50 kHz (47 to 160 ns), more preferably 10-3O kHz and the highest removal rates occur in the 10- 20 kHz (47 to 63 ns) range.
Again, this results from the underlying physical mechanisms involved as described above. For the 50 kHz case, although the pulses are relatively long the pulse irradiance is low, and in many cases the vaporisation temperature for WC is not reached within the pulse duration. Only the maximum pulse irradiance reaches the material removal stage. In fact the removal rate generally drops to zero at 50 kHz repetition rate - the pulse irradiance is insufficient for the material to reach its vaporisation temperature, so there is no vaporisation and therefore no material removal. This means that the minimum pulse irradiance boundary condition is not reached. Only at lower repetition rates is material removed where the pulse irradiance level is high enough to reach the vaporisation temperature within the duration of the pulse. For example, for the 30 kHz case, whilst the pulse durations are shorter, the pulse irradiance is much higher and the material removal stage is reached more quickly within the duration of the pulse.
It is interesting to note that for both of these cases the laser output power may be the same. This means that by maintaining the laser output power and by changing other laser parameters a great deal of improvement to the material removal rate can be made.
Turning to a further application of the tool, cutting is described below with reference to Fig. 5 which shows a laser cutting apparatus of similar nature to that shown in Fig. 1, like reference numerals relating to like parts. The principal difference is the provision of a gas assisting cutting head 40.
The laser piercing and cutting approach uses the higher power Starlase AO4 Nd: YAG Q-switched DPSSL at the fundamental wavelength of 1064 nm available from Powerlase Limited, Crawley, West Sussex.. This pulsed laser offers average powers up to 420 W at a range of repetition rates and pulse durations between 3 to 50 kHz and 20 to 200 ns respectively. The output beam power is varied using an attenuator unit, collimated with a Galilean telescope 16, 18 and then directed by mirror 42 into an Anorad XYZ motion stage 11, available from Anorad UK, Rockwell Automation, Basingstoke, UK. This stage moves the target in the XY directions and the focussing head in the Z direction. The Anorad system is granite mounted and has linear drives capable of a top speed of 2 m/s with an accuracy of +/-1 μm over an XY travel of 450 x 450 mm. The laser beam is focus sed with a variety of lenses 46 of focal length 100 mm to 2O3 mm for example a lens of focal length 149 mm producing at best focus a 200 μm diameter spot. The cutting head 40 allows a co-axial gas jet 48 to be used to assist the cutting process which can be compressed air, oxygen or nitrogen and can be supplied to the work-piece at pressures up to 10 Bar.
The cutting technique adopted comprises reactive fusion cutting, known as "melt burn and blow", in which a laser beam creates a melt pool and a co-axial gas jet blows the liquid out of the bottom of the cut, the gas jet reacting exothermically with the molten material, adding another heat source to the process and accelerating the creation of the melt pool and hence the cutting speed. This approach provides excellent perpendicular edge quality using either oxygen or air as the gas jet.
In practice it is found that the cutting operation has two distinct phases. The pierce-through phase occurs at the start of a cut-line where a percussion drilled hole is made. For most of this operation the hole is blind and the debris from the drilling operation is thrown up out of the hole entrance, resulting in an area of dross on the material surface around the hole. The Cutting phase follows the pierce-through. The laser cutting head is moved over the material at a constant speed and the material is cut in a single pass. An angled cut front is established and this is where the laser beam is absorbed. The laser beam is waveguided through the thickness of the material.
Operation of the system is principally as discussed above in relation to laser milling, however with specific operation parameters as discussed in more detail below with specific reference to PCD.
In particular the preferred pulse repetition rate is the range 10 to 50 kHz or more preferably 40 to 50 kHz and the pulse duration is preferably 30 to 200 ns, more preferably 100 to 200 ns. The average laser power 300 W to 1 kW, more preferably 350 to 400 W and the irradiance is preferably in the range 106 to 10s Wcm"2, more preferably of the order of magnitude 100 MW cm"2 and most preferably 110 MWcm"2 (piercing) 118 MWcm2 (cutting). The preferred assist gas pressure is in the region 1 to 10 Bar, more preferably 8 Bar. Referring to Fig. 6 the relationship between PCD depth and test duration during piercing is shown for a range of repetition rates.
In terms of the scanning speed of the beam across the material to be cut, it is preferable to operate at higher speeds because not only does this increase production rates but is also allows less time for the heat to diffuse sideways and creates narrower Heat Affected Zones (HAZ). The optimum speed range is found to be 21 to 27 mm/minute with the best edge quality obtained around 24 mm/minute. The limit on the cutting speed is the point at which the gas jet can no longer eject molten material, at which point the react diffusion cutting operation fails.
In case of composite PCDAVC materials of time type shown in Fig. 2, it is found that at 100 MWcm"2 the PCD removal rate is 7.6 mm3/min whilst WC is just at the threshold of removal. For cutting purposes this means, with the WC side upwards, close to the cutting nozzle and best focus, the preferred range for irradiance is 10 to 10 Wcm"" most preferably 120 MWcm" , more preferably 100 to 200 MWcm"2, repetition rate 40 to 50 kHz, most preferably 45 Hz, pulse duration 41 ns to 200 ns, more preferably 155 ns to 200 ns, pulse energy 6.7 mJ and oxygen gas assist at 8 Bar. These values are preferred for direct WC cutting as well.
However it is found that when cutting with the WC side upwards, striations are caused by the reactive fusion gas cutting; process. This problem can be overcome by turning over the material so that the PCD side is closest to the cutting nozzle. The best focus position is maintained in this orientation, namely half way through the WC. As a result the assist gas goes through the PCD layer in order to reach the WC, so that there is much less deposited on the PCD, leaving it mostly clean and dross free. This approach provides a significant improvement, reducing the PCD striations and providing a straight, sharp edge on the cutting edge. The PCD layer is dross free and no discontinuity is created between the PCD and the WC layers. The removal of the striations reduces degradation of the straightness of the cutting edge. Non formation of dross ensures that there is reduced interference Λvith the brazing process by which the PCD cutting tools are mounted in to a holder prior to use which can otherwise result in a weaker joint. Removal of a step or discontinuity at the PCD-WC interface removes a weakness at the interface between the materials which can be a source of premature failure of the cutting tool. It is further noted that although some striation is still present but the other layer is dross free, the striations assist the brazing process by providing a larger surface area for the brazing process to adhere to.
The range of parameters provide surprisingly good operation "because the high irradiance, high repetition rate laser pulses produce molten and vaporised WC for the oxygen to react with. This burning reaction proceeds outwards from the laser focal spot in all directions, causing striations until the turning reaction moves too far away from its fuel source (the focussed laser beam and co-axial gas jet). By that time the laser cutting head has moved to a. fresh section of PCD where the burning process starts again. As the cutting speed is increased to that of the "burning reaction" speed, there is a decrease in striation formation.
The pulse irradiance used in the successful cutting trials (118 MWcm"2) is just above the threshold for WC removal by vaporisation, as shov^n in Fig. 4. It is believed that the cutting process is being enhanced by this vaporisation, with the oxygen assist gas reacting directly with the WC vapour rather than the melt. This could lead to a much more exothermic reaction which would result in faster cutting.
In one preferred approach the cutting process is applied in multiple passes, for example first and second passes, where each may use, for example, the settings described above, with the PCD layer uppermost/closest to the cutting nozzle. In that case the first pass is used to cut through the PCD and the second pass is used to increase the quality of the PCD cutting edge.
In one preferred implementation, dynamic focus changes between the different passes is used to provide improved results. For example in the first pass the focus position may be located within the WC layer as described above. However for the second pass the focus can be moved up to the uppermost surface of the PCD. It is found that this approach in particular increases the quality of the PCD cutting edge. It is also possible to move the focus position for the second pass to an alternative location within either the WC layer or the PCD layer.
In a further improvement a negative taper may be formed on the cutting edge of the material so that the leading cutting edge overhangs the lower edge as shown. in Fig. 8. In particular it can be seen that a cutting nozzle designated very generally 70 is provided near a PCD/WC layered composite 76 with the PCD layer 72 uppermost and closest to the nozzle. The leading cutting edge 74 off the PCD layer overhangs the WC layer such that a negative taper designated generally θ is created. It is further found that changing the focus position fronx a point designated generally X, half way through the WC layer to a point designated generally Y, at the upper surface of the PCD layer can help with the production of a negative taper. The amount of taper will vary with the specifics of the PCD and the material that the PCD will be used to process (wood, copper, aluminium, etc). The taper angle is typically 7 degrees and not normally greater than 15 degrees,
The approaches described above give rise to a number of advantages: it is found that it is possible to process hard materials at superior rates to conventional technologies, achieving comparable quality without the issues of tool wear and lubrication to contend with. This technology can both cut and mill these materials in concurrent processing - offering new flexibility for manufacturing design.
Much higher energy intensities are now possible with DPSSLs and the nanosecond-kilohertz regime of operation greatly improves many challenging laser materials processing applications. The short pulses diminish thermal effects and improve process quality, while higher fluences improve material coupling and process efficiency. DPSSLs also offer a combination of good beam quality, high efficiency, rugged construction and long diode lifetime. This allows manufacturing on both the macro and micro scale. Laser cutting of PCD is possible with DPSS lasers at much higher cutting speeds than alternative technologies.
For example in comparison with EDM, a laser cutting rate of 24 mm/minute is achieved which is four times faster than the corresponding rate using EDM. Yet further the use of the laser and scanner stage allows omnidirectional cutting.
Laminate structures can be cut using the technique such that PCD and WC disks achieve a cut quality of the same quality as EDM and better than for FPSS. Such laminate structures include Syndite ™ available from deBeers and single layer or composite structures with thicknesses preferably in the range 0.5 mm to 3.2 mm, for example composite structures of thickness 1.6, 2.0 or 3.2 mm with 0.5 mm PCD on a WC substrate.
It will be appreciated that the technique described herein can be extended to any appropriate hard material and using any laser capable of achieving the specific parameters set out herein. Any material processing application can be adopted in addition to cutting and milling such as indelible marking, drilling of PCD material, for example with a fine hole to make wire drawing dies and 3D milling to create 3D shapes.

Claims

Claims
1. An apparatus for processing hard material comprising a laser configured to deliver a pulsed beam having an irradiance in the range 106 to 109 Wcnϊ2 and a repetition rate in the range 10 to 50 kHz.
2. An apparatus as claimed in claim 1 in which the laser pulse has a pulse duration in the range 30 to 200 ns, more preferably 100 to 200 ns.
3. A hard material milling apparatus comprising an apparatus as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 in which the irradiance is in the range 107 to 109 Wcm"2 and a repetition rate in the range 10 to 50 kHz.
4. A PCD milling apparatus comprising an apparatus as claimed in claim 3 in which the irradiance is in the range 100 to 200 MWcnαf2, and the repetition rate is in the range 40 to 50 kHz.
5. A WC milling apparatus comprising an apparatus as claimed in claim 3 in which the irradiance is in the range 108 to 109 Wcm"2, more preferably 500 to 700 MWcm2 and the repetition rate is in the range 10 to 50 kHz, more preferably 10 to 30 kHz, more preferably 10 to 20 kHz.
6. A hard material cutting apparatus comprising an apparatus as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 in which the irradiance is in the range 106 to 108 Wcm"2 and the repetition rate is in the range 10 to 50 kHz.
7. A PCD cutting apparatus as claimed in claim 6 in which the irradiance is in the range 106 to 108 Wcm"2, more preferably 100 to 120 MWcm"2 or more preferably 110 MWcrrf2 (piercing) or 118 MWcirf2 (cutting) and in which the repetition rate is in the range 40 to 50 kHz more.
8. A WC cutting apparatus comprising an apparatus as claimed in claim 6 in which the irradiance is in the range 10s to 109 Wcm"2, more preferably
100 to 200 MWcm"2 and the repetition rate is in the range 40 to 50 kHz.
9. A method of milling a hard material comprising delivering a pulsed laser beam to the material of irradiance in the range 107 to 109 Wcm"2 and repetition rate in the range 10 to 50 kHz.
10. A method of cutting a hard material comprising delivering a pulsed laser b beeaamm t too t thhee m maatteerriiaall o off i irrrraaddiiance in the range 106 to 10s W and repetition rate 10 to 50 kHz.
11. A method as claimed in claim 10 in which the material comprises a PCD layer on WC substrate.
12. A method as claimed in claim 11 in which the pulsed laser beam is delivered to the PCD surface.
13. A method as claimed in claim 12 in which the beam is focused at a point within the WC substrate.
14. A method as claimed in claim 13 in which the focus point is substantially half way through the WC substrate.
15. A method as claimed in any of claims 12 to 14 in which the pulsed laser beam is delivered in multiple passes.
16. A method as claimed in claim 15 in which, on a first pass, the laser beam is focused at a point within the WC layer and on a second pass the beam is focused at the surface of the PCD layer.
17. A method as claimed in claim 15 in which, on a first pass, the laser beam is focused at a point within the WC layer and on a second pass the beam is focused at a point within the PCD layer.
18. A method as claimed in claim 15 in which, on a first pass, the laser beam is focused at a first point within the WC layer and on a second pass the beam is focused at a second point within the WC layer, wherein said first and second points are different.
19. A method as claimed in any of claims 10 to 16 in which a negative taper is formed on the material.
20. A method of processing hard material comprising delivering a pulsed laser beam to the material of irradiance in the range 106 to 109 Wcm"2 and repetition rate in the range 10 to 50 kHz.
21. An apparatus for processing hard material comprising a laser configured to deliver a pulsed beam having an irradiance in the range 106 to
109 Wcm"2 and a pulse duration in the range 30 to 200 ns, more preferably 100 to 200 ns.
22. A hard material milling apparatus comprising an apparatus as claimed in claim 19 in which the irradiance is in the range 107 to 109 Wcm"2 and the pulse duration is in the range 47 ns to 160 ns.
23. A hard material cutting apparatus comprising an apparatus as claimed in claim 19 in which the irradiance is in the range 106 to 108 Wcm"2 and the pulse duration is in the range 100 to 200 ns.
24. An apparatus as claimed in any of claims 1 to 8 in which the hard material comprises a composite material.
25. An apparatus as claimed in claim 22 in which the composite material comprises a PCD WC composite.
26. A method of processing hard material comprising delivering a pulsed laser beam of a predetermined spot size and scanning the beam over a work piece such that adjacent pulses spatially overlap to an extent such that material is vaporised but does not form a melt pool.
27. A method of cutting a hard material comprising a PCD layer on a WC substrate comprising delivering a cutting laser beam to the PCD surface.
28. A method of cutting a hard material comprising delivering a laser beam to the material in multiple passes.
29. A method as claimed in claim 26 further comprising varying the beam focus between passes.
30. A method as claimed in claim 27 in which the beam is focused to a point within the material on a first pass and on a surface of the material on a second path.
31. A method as claimed in claim 27 or 28 further comprising forming a negative taper in the material.
32. An apparatus as claimed in any of claims 1 to 8 or 19 to 24 substantially as described herein with reference to the Figures.
PCT/GB2005/003855 2004-10-07 2005-10-07 An apparatus and a method for processing hard material using a laser having an irradiance in the range 10 '6 to 10 '9 w/cm'2 and a repetition rate in the range 10 to 50 khz WO2006038017A2 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2007535239A JP2008515643A (en) 2004-10-07 2005-10-07 Hard material processing apparatus and processing method using laser having irradiance in the range of 106 to 109 Wcm-2 and repetition rate in the range of 10 to 50 kHz
EP05790890A EP1802421A2 (en) 2004-10-07 2005-10-07 An apparatus for processing hard material

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0422318A GB0422318D0 (en) 2004-10-07 2004-10-07 An apparatus for processing hard material
GB0422318.6 2004-10-07
GB0511966A GB0511966D0 (en) 2005-06-13 2005-06-13 An apparatus for processing hard material
GB0511966.4 2005-06-13

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2006038017A2 true WO2006038017A2 (en) 2006-04-13
WO2006038017A3 WO2006038017A3 (en) 2007-06-28

Family

ID=35453350

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/GB2005/003855 WO2006038017A2 (en) 2004-10-07 2005-10-07 An apparatus and a method for processing hard material using a laser having an irradiance in the range 10 '6 to 10 '9 w/cm'2 and a repetition rate in the range 10 to 50 khz

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1802421A2 (en)
JP (1) JP2008515643A (en)
WO (1) WO2006038017A2 (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007124828A1 (en) * 2006-04-27 2007-11-08 Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik Gmbh Method and device for the positionally accurate triggering of an optionally activated machine part
EP2314412A2 (en) 2009-10-22 2011-04-27 Ewag AG Laser machining apparatus and method for forming a surface on an unfinished product
CN102091863A (en) * 2009-12-10 2011-06-15 三菱综合材料株式会社 Laser processing device and laser processing method
DE102010011508A1 (en) 2010-03-15 2011-09-15 Ewag Ag Laser processing apparatus and method for producing a rotationally symmetrical tool
US9259803B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2016-02-16 Baker Hughes Incorporated Methods and apparatuses for forming cutting elements having a chamfered edge for earth-boring tools
US9931714B2 (en) 2015-09-11 2018-04-03 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Methods and systems for removing interstitial material from superabrasive materials of cutting elements using energy beams
US10016876B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2018-07-10 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Methods of forming polycrystalline compacts and earth-boring tools including polycrystalline compacts
CN111098039A (en) * 2019-12-20 2020-05-05 西安交通大学 Ultraviolet nanosecond laser cutting method of PCD (Poly Crystal Diamond) turning cutter

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
PL2289708T3 (en) * 2009-08-26 2012-05-31 Indaffil Holding Ag Method for producing a surface structure of a metallic pressed sheet, continuous ribbon or embossing roller
CN103406670A (en) * 2013-07-02 2013-11-27 浙江工业职业技术学院 Laser cutting system for polycrystalline diamond compact

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5483038A (en) * 1992-04-23 1996-01-09 Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. Method of working diamond with ultraviolet light
US6054673A (en) * 1997-09-17 2000-04-25 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for laser drilling
US20020104831A1 (en) * 2001-02-08 2002-08-08 The Regents Of The University Of California High precision, rapid laser hole drilling
US6605798B1 (en) * 1998-12-22 2003-08-12 Barry James Cullen Cutting of ultra-hard materials

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5483038A (en) * 1992-04-23 1996-01-09 Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd. Method of working diamond with ultraviolet light
US6054673A (en) * 1997-09-17 2000-04-25 General Electric Company Method and apparatus for laser drilling
US6605798B1 (en) * 1998-12-22 2003-08-12 Barry James Cullen Cutting of ultra-hard materials
US20020104831A1 (en) * 2001-02-08 2002-08-08 The Regents Of The University Of California High precision, rapid laser hole drilling

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
M. HENRY ET AL: "laser milling - a practical industrial solution for machining a wide variety of materials" 5TH LASER PRECISION MICROMACHINING CONFERENCE 2005, [Online] May 2004 (2004-05), XP002359264 Release and publication Retrieved from the Internet: URL:www.powerlase.com> *

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007124828A1 (en) * 2006-04-27 2007-11-08 Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik Gmbh Method and device for the positionally accurate triggering of an optionally activated machine part
US8115440B2 (en) 2006-04-27 2012-02-14 Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik Gmbh Method and apparatus for position-accurate triggering of a machine part
US10029350B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2018-07-24 Baker Hughes Incorporated Methods of forming polycrystalline compacts and earth-boring tools including polycrystalline compacts
US10016876B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2018-07-10 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Methods of forming polycrystalline compacts and earth-boring tools including polycrystalline compacts
US9259803B2 (en) 2007-11-05 2016-02-16 Baker Hughes Incorporated Methods and apparatuses for forming cutting elements having a chamfered edge for earth-boring tools
CN102091875A (en) * 2009-10-22 2011-06-15 埃瓦格股份公司 Laser machining apparatus and method for forming a surface on an unfinished product
EP2314412B1 (en) 2009-10-22 2018-12-19 Ewag AG Laser machining apparatus and method for forming a surface on an unfinished product
EP2314412A2 (en) 2009-10-22 2011-04-27 Ewag AG Laser machining apparatus and method for forming a surface on an unfinished product
US20110095005A1 (en) * 2009-10-22 2011-04-28 Gerhard Brunner Laser machining apparatus and method for forming a surface on an unifinished product
US8969758B2 (en) 2009-10-22 2015-03-03 Ewag Ag Laser machining apparatus and method for forming a surface on an unfinished product
DE102009044316B4 (en) * 2009-10-22 2015-04-30 Ewag Ag Method for producing a surface and / or edge on a blank and laser processing device for carrying out the method
CN102091875B (en) * 2009-10-22 2016-03-09 埃瓦格股份公司 For forming laser process equipment and the method on surface in unfinished products
DE102009044316A1 (en) 2009-10-22 2011-05-05 Ewag Ag Laser processing apparatus and method for producing a surface on a blank
CN102091863A (en) * 2009-12-10 2011-06-15 三菱综合材料株式会社 Laser processing device and laser processing method
DE102010011508B4 (en) * 2010-03-15 2015-12-10 Ewag Ag Method for producing at least one flute and at least one cutting edge and laser processing device
EP2374569A2 (en) 2010-03-15 2011-10-12 Ewag AG Laser processing device and method for manufacturing a rotation symmetric tool
EP2374569B1 (en) 2010-03-15 2018-11-07 Ewag AG Laser processing device and method for manufacturing a rotation symmetric tool
DE102010011508A1 (en) 2010-03-15 2011-09-15 Ewag Ag Laser processing apparatus and method for producing a rotationally symmetrical tool
US9931714B2 (en) 2015-09-11 2018-04-03 Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc Methods and systems for removing interstitial material from superabrasive materials of cutting elements using energy beams
US11548098B2 (en) 2015-09-11 2023-01-10 Baker Hughes Holdings Llc Methods for removing interstitial material from superabrasive materials of cutting elements using energy beams
CN111098039A (en) * 2019-12-20 2020-05-05 西安交通大学 Ultraviolet nanosecond laser cutting method of PCD (Poly Crystal Diamond) turning cutter
CN111098039B (en) * 2019-12-20 2021-05-28 西安交通大学 Ultraviolet nanosecond laser cutting method of PCD (Poly Crystal Diamond) turning cutter

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2008515643A (en) 2008-05-15
EP1802421A2 (en) 2007-07-04
WO2006038017A3 (en) 2007-06-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Khorasani et al. Laser subtractive and laser powder bed fusion of metals: Review of process and production features
JP5432285B2 (en) Method of laser processing glass into a shape with chamfered edges
KR100675535B1 (en) Glass cutting method and its apparatus
EP1430987B1 (en) Laser-induced plasma micromachining
JP2007216327A (en) Forming method of chip breaker
KR20000022579A (en) Laser piercing method, laser processing nozzle, and laser cutting apparatus
Harrison et al. Laser processing of polycrystalline diamond, tungsten carbide, and a related composite material
JP2002331377A (en) Laser piercing method
CN111151892B (en) Non-taper laser cutting method
WO2006038017A2 (en) An apparatus and a method for processing hard material using a laser having an irradiance in the range 10 '6 to 10 '9 w/cm'2 and a repetition rate in the range 10 to 50 khz
WO2020239857A1 (en) Laser hole drilling apparatus and method
JP2718795B2 (en) Method for fine processing of work surface using laser beam
GB2389330A (en) Machining of cooling air holes in gas turbine components
Bahar et al. Pulsed Nd: YAG laser drilling of aerospace materials (Ti-6Al-4V)
JPH0237985A (en) Method and device for laser beam processing
Pantawane et al. Laser beam machining of aluminum and aluminum alloys
EP1525069B1 (en) System and method of laser drilling using a continuously optimized depth of focus
JP2000024923A (en) Fine hole.groove machining method
Steen et al. Laser cutting, drilling and piercing
KR20100007949A (en) Laser working method, and oil ring wire rod
Suttmann et al. Drilling, cutting, welding, marking and microforming
Li et al. Grit blast assisted laser milling/grooving of metallic alloys
KR100565967B1 (en) An method for cutting form of chip breaker on pcd/pcbn using laser and an insert for cutting head
JP4186403B2 (en) Laser cutting method
GB2355222A (en) Improvements in laser machining

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KM KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV LY MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NG NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SM SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 07034252

Country of ref document: CO

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2007535239

Country of ref document: JP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: DE

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2005790890

Country of ref document: EP

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 2005790890

Country of ref document: EP