Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

WO1999043408A1 - Solvent extraction of ferric chloride - Google Patents

Solvent extraction of ferric chloride Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1999043408A1
WO1999043408A1 PCT/US1999/004141 US9904141W WO9943408A1 WO 1999043408 A1 WO1999043408 A1 WO 1999043408A1 US 9904141 W US9904141 W US 9904141W WO 9943408 A1 WO9943408 A1 WO 9943408A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
line
extraction
ferric chloride
solution
fecl
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US1999/004141
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Satish C. Wadhawan
Original Assignee
Wadhawan Satish C
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Wadhawan Satish C filed Critical Wadhawan Satish C
Priority to CA002318823A priority Critical patent/CA2318823A1/en
Publication of WO1999043408A1 publication Critical patent/WO1999043408A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01GCOMPOUNDS CONTAINING METALS NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C01D OR C01F
    • C01G49/00Compounds of iron
    • C01G49/10Halides
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C01INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C01GCOMPOUNDS CONTAINING METALS NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C01D OR C01F
    • C01G49/00Compounds of iron
    • C01G49/0009Preparation involving a liquid-liquid extraction, an adsorption or an ion-exchange

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to the separation of chemicals and more particularly to processes for purifying ferrous or ferric chloride solutions.
  • the industrial use of pure the ultrapure iron chloride increases each year.
  • the following processes are the major consumers: production of ferrites; production of pure iron powders; production of iron oxide elements; production of ultrapure alloys for the electronics industry; etching of copper plate or other copper materials; and synthesis of various compounds .
  • the first of these methods is the traditional means of obtaining salt by recrystallization to remove impurities, precipitation of iron hydroxide, followed by washing and calcination.
  • Another method is the electrolytic production of metallic iron followed by conversion to the oxide.
  • Still another method is the purification of iron in the melt followed by burning of the iron powder.
  • a more effective method to achieve high-purity Iron oxide is the combination of the extraction of iron from a chloride solution, followed by pyrohydrolysis of the pure FeCl 3 solution, which simultaneously produces iron oxide (Fe 2 0 3 ) and concentrated hydrochloric acid (HC1) .
  • the rate of layering of the emulsion was slow, due to the high viscosity of the organic phase and the small difference in specific gravity between the organic and aqueous phases, especially at the stages of raffinate removal and water in flow for re-extraction.
  • TBP did not yield solutions as concentrated as those yielded by sending the feed directly to the hydroprolysis equipment in the final analysis; TBP cannot be used for industrial production.
  • TOA is usually used with a dilutent (kerosene) , and problems are usually not encountered with separating the aqueous and organic phases.
  • TOA also has certain disadvantages: low concentrations of FeCl 3 .
  • low concentration re-extracts can lead to the co-extraction of other elements, i.e. Zn. For this reason,
  • TOA is also not used in the industrial production of ultrapure iron oxide.
  • Methylisobutylketone, C 4 H 9 COCH 3 , (MBK) is also a good extractor of iron. However, it has a high vapor pressure and is extremely flammable. Its use in hot climates (such as India's) is not possible. In addition, much liquid is lost during operations to evaporation and given the low concentration of
  • the present invention comprises a process to purify ferrous or ferric chloride solutions with high amounts of impurities, especially impurities such as Ca, Na, Ma, V, Cr, Ni, and the like, that cannot be removed by conventional technologies using selective precipitation.
  • the process developed is based on using a selective organic solvent that will selectively extract ferric chloride and leave the impurities in the raffinate.
  • the process can be used for either ferrous or ferric chloride, since the ferrous chloride, if the solution contains any ferrous chloride, must be converted to the ferric chloride form by oxidizing with chloride.
  • the iron in the raffinate is recovered by a subsequent extraction stage.
  • Final recovery of ferric chloride from the organic solvent is achieved by stripping the solution with pure water.
  • the impure liquor is concentrated to about 50% ferric chloride by evaporation.
  • two to three stages of solvent extraction and two to three stages of evaporation may be used. Each solvent extraction stage may contain as much as fifteen or more cells, consisting of as much as nine cells for extraction and six cells for stripping.
  • each solvent stage will have extraction, washing, and stripping
  • the multiple effect evaporators may be used.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a preferred embodiment of the process of the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of an alternate preferred embodiment of the processes of the present invention.
  • FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of the leach liquor processing unit employed in the process of the invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT Referring to FIG. 1, there is an initial feed solution of FeCl 3 provided in line 10 to an evaporation apparatus 12. Condensate from this evaporation apparatus is transported in line 14; the stripping apparatus 16; pure water is added to the condensate in line 18. Ferric chloride solution is transported from the evaporation apparatus 12 in line 20 to an extraction apparatus 22. Organic solvent that is preferably N-octanol is introduced to the extraction apparatus 22 in line 24. The solution is removed from the extraction apparatus 20 in line 26 to the stripping apparatus 16.
  • Solvent is removed from stripping apparatus 16 in line 28 and a pure solution of ferric chloride is removed in liquor line 30.
  • Raffinate is removed from extraction apparatus 22 in line 32 to line 34 and then introduced to evaporation apparatus 36.
  • Condensate is removed from evaporation apparatus 36 in condensate line 38, which connects to strip solution line 40 and strip solution line 42.
  • a feed line 44 connects the evaporation apparatus 36 to an extraction apparatus 46, and organic solvent is introduced to the extraction apparatus 46 through an organic solvent line 48.
  • Line 50 removes solution from the extraction apparatus to a stripping apparatus 52, and there is an off-line 54 from this stripping apparatus as well as a liquor line 56 that connects to the initial feed line 10.
  • a raffinate line 58 connects the extraction apparatus 46 to another extraction apparatus 60, which also is provided with solvent through organic solvent line 62.
  • Line 64 connects extraction apparatus 60 with stripping apparatus 66 that has an off-line 68 and liquor line 34. Raffinate is removed from the extraction apparatus 60 as waste solution in raffinate line 70.
  • ferric chloride is introduced in feed line 72 to evaporation apparatus 74. Condensate is then removed from this evaporation apparatus 74 in condensate line 76 to extractor apparatus 78. There is an organic input line 80 for this extractor apparatus 78 as well as an extractor output line 82, which connects to a washer apparatus 84. A washer output line 86 connects to a stripper apparatus 88 that is outputted to line 80. Condensate is introduced to stripper apparatus 88 in condensate lines 75 and 90, and solution is removed from the stripper apparatus in output line 92 that connects to an evaporator feed line 94 and a liquor output line 96.
  • Line 94 connects to an evaporator 98, which is outputted in line 100 to line 89.
  • Evaporator 98 is also connected to washer apparatus 84 by line 102.
  • Raffinate line 104 comes off the extraction apparatus 78 to connect to line 106 for introduction of solution to another evaporator 108 from which condensate is removed in line 110.
  • Organic solvent is introduced in lines 111 and 112 to extractor apparatus 114 from which solvent is removed in line 116 to washer apparatus 118.
  • Solvent is removed from the washer apparatus 118 in line 120 to a stripper apparatus 122, which is connected to solvent line 112.
  • a condensate line 124 also brings condensate from line 110 to stripper apparatus 122, and a stripper output line 126 to remove solution from the stripper 122.
  • Line 128 removes solution from washer apparatus 118 and is connected with stripper output line 126 to flow into recirculation line 130 which is connected to feed line 72.
  • Washer apparatus 84 is connected by line 132 to washer apparatus 118.
  • Extraction apparatus 114 is connected by raffinate line 134 to recirculation line 136 and to waste solution line 138. Referring to FIG. 3, leach liquor feed line 140 is connected to a leach liquor filter 142.
  • the leach liquor filter output line 144 is connected to leach liquor preheater 146 that is heated by steam provided in steam header 148. Condensate is removed from the preheater 146 in condensate return line 150 and line 152 connects evaporated liquor to chlorination column 154. Chlorine is provided to the chlorination column 154 in chlorine line 156. Chlorinated liquor is removed to a storage tank in line 158 and evaporated material is removed in line 160 to a chlorination scrubber 162. Line 164 recirculates material from the chlorination scrubber 162 to the leach liquor filter output line 144. Chlorination scrubber output line 166 removes liquor to an ilmenite liquor storage tank (not shown) .
  • the equilibrium extraction curve (the dependence of the concentration of FeCl 3 in the organic solvent on the concentration in the aqueous phase) is practically a straight line.
  • the Y-axis is expressed as the solution density, which can easily be converted to concentrations, knowing the corresponding concentration of HCl.
  • the given information is sufficient to evaluate the extraction.
  • the extraction proceeded well; taking into account the decrease in the volume flow of the water phase, the extraction of V into the
  • the re-extraction of the water results in a liquor with a concentration of 400 g/1 FeCl 3 and higher.
  • concentration of FeCl 3 and the presence of acid in the water phase which was in equilibrium with the organic phase, limits the FeCl 3 in the organic phase, lowering the efficiency of the re-extraction process.
  • N-octanol has demonstrated the following: l.A sufficiently high-purity of liquor (only traces of impurities) .
  • N-octanol is not volatile at the process temperatures.
  • the waste solution from synthetic rutile production (after • chlorinaton) could be characterized as "impure" with aiig HCl concentration.
  • impure with aiig HCl concentration.
  • the washing required a 580 g/1 FeCl 3 liquor. That concentration corresponds to the equilibrium concentration of FeCl 3 in the water phase in the first stage of extraction.
  • the washing must not be done with a lower concentration of FeCl 3 , since a significant portion of FeCl 3 will enter the water phase and the concentration in the organic phase will fall and the liquor will be lower in FeCl than permissible.
  • the liquor was washed two times. Practically, the industrial process should include three washings. The washings should be returned to the extraction
  • the raffinate after the first stage of the extraction, is again evaporated.
  • Raffinate-2 is added to the first raffinate to achieve the required extraction of FeCl 3 .
  • the organic phase after the second phase after the second extraction, will contain many more impurities than after the first extraction, and must be washed more carefully. In fact, the possible extraction processes are defined by which extraction stage the solutions are sent back to after the first and second washings.
  • Raffinate-1 is mixed with the recycled and amalgamated solutions after washing and is sent to the evaporator a second time.
  • the condensate is used for the re-extraction.
  • the evaporated solution undergoes seven stages of extraction until the organic phase saturates at 162.5 g/1 FeCl 3 . Then it undergoes two washings of three stages each. The first stage is the amalgamated solution after I and III washings; the second stage is the final washing with fresh solution.
  • the re- extract-2 is likewise put through five stages with the condensate.
  • the re-extract-2 should reach the same quality as the re-extract-1.
  • Raffinate-2 is divided into two parts; the
  • the major difficulty in developing the technology is the large concentration of impurities in the solution entering the second extraction.
  • the impurities are nearly half of the FeCl 3 concentration. It is difficult to achieve an ultrapure product from that, while simultaneously minimizing washing.
  • Similar purification of ferrous chloride solution using the above solvent extraction process can be achieved by first chlorinating ferrous chloride to ferric chloride solution.
  • the exhaust gases are scrubbed with the impure ferrous chloride solution.
  • the exhaust gases are scrubbed with impure ferrous chloride solution to achieve acceptable chlorine emissions.
  • a system consisting of solvent extraction with/without chlorination and spray roaster acid regeneration is used to produce high-purity Iron oxide.
  • the system is designed and coordinated so that excess condensate water is used as make-up water for the absorber to produce regenerated acid. This will eliminate any wastewater stream and produce 18% or 32% HCl, to produce high concentration acid (above 26% HCl) .

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Compounds Of Heavy Metals (AREA)
  • Extraction Or Liquid Replacement (AREA)

Abstract

A method of purifying ferric chloride solutions with impurities having the following steps: first, the ferric chloride solution (10) containing impurities is treated with an organic solvent (24) selected from an alcohol having from about 4 to about 20 carbon atoms to selectively dissolve the ferric chloride. The resulting organic solvent (26) is then stripped from the selectively dissolved ferric chloride (30).

Description

SOLVENT EXTRACTION OF FERRIC CHLORIDE
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION (1) Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the separation of chemicals and more particularly to processes for purifying ferrous or ferric chloride solutions.
(2) Brief Description of Prior Developments
The industrial use of pure the ultrapure iron chloride increases each year. The following processes are the major consumers: production of ferrites; production of pure iron powders; production of iron oxide elements; production of ultrapure alloys for the electronics industry; etching of copper plate or other copper materials; and synthesis of various compounds .
There are three principal methods to produce pure iron oxide. The first of these methods is the traditional means of obtaining salt by recrystallization to remove impurities, precipitation of iron hydroxide, followed by washing and calcination. Another method is the electrolytic production of metallic iron followed by conversion to the oxide. Still another method is the purification of iron in the melt followed by burning of the iron powder.
All of these methods involve multiple and laborious intensive steps. Research into novel methods has been on going for many years. The production of iron and its purification via liquid-liquid extraction is relatively new and was recently introduced to the industry to obtain pure solutions of FeCl and FeS04. The traditional, industrial method used to obtain iron oxide was recrystallization, which has been replaced with extraction.
A more effective method to achieve high-purity Iron oxide is the combination of the extraction of iron from a chloride solution, followed by pyrohydrolysis of the pure FeCl3 solution, which simultaneously produces iron oxide (Fe203) and concentrated hydrochloric acid (HC1) .
The extraction of iron from acidic salt solution has been known for more than fifty years. The method is used in analytical chemistry as a means to purify various solutions from iron. With the introduction of new technology that utilizes pure Iron oxide as a basic material, the liquid extraction of iron has received increased attention from industry. Tributylphosphate, (C4Hg)3P0 (TBP) , easily extracts FeCl3 from solutions containing HC1. The higher the concentration of HC1, the steeper the equilibrium curve that describes the partitioning of FeCl3 between the organic and aqueous phases. The FeCl is completely extracted from the aqueous phase if the concentration of HCl exceeds 50-60 g/1. Laboratory tests conducted in KSC, on continuously operating equipment, have demonstrated the feasibility of extracting pure solutions of FeCl3. However, in further testing at the pilot plant, using industrial FeCl3 solutions, a problem arose with the use to tributylphosphate. The concentrations of Si and K exceeded the minimum allowable levels. In addition, P was also a major impurity, due to the use of TBP, which partially hydrolyzes when the concentration of HCl in the feedstock exceeds 90-100 g/1, which leads to large losses of TBP. In addition, salts of organic compounds, arising from the hydrolysis byproducts, completely contaminated the first attempts at extraction.
The rate of layering of the emulsion was slow, due to the high viscosity of the organic phase and the small difference in specific gravity between the organic and aqueous phases, especially at the stages of raffinate removal and water in flow for re-extraction.
Further experiments conducted completely corroborated the previous results. In addition, TBP did not yield solutions as concentrated as those yielded by sending the feed directly to the hydroprolysis equipment in the final analysis; TBP cannot be used for industrial production.
Trioctylamine, (C87)3N (TOA), after work-up with HCl, also easily extracts FeCl3 at low Cl" concentrations in the equilibrated aqueous phase (70 or more g/1) . TOA is usually used with a dilutent (kerosene) , and problems are usually not encountered with separating the aqueous and organic phases.
However, TOA also has certain disadvantages: low concentrations of FeCl3. For example, low concentration re-extracts can lead to the co-extraction of other elements, i.e. Zn. For this reason,
TOA is also not used in the industrial production of ultrapure iron oxide.
Methylisobutylketone, C4H9COCH3, (MBK) is also a good extractor of iron. However, it has a high vapor pressure and is extremely flammable. Its use in hot climates (such as India's) is not possible. In addition, much liquid is lost during operations to evaporation and given the low concentration of
FeCl in re-extracts, extractions using MBK do not yield the desired economic returns. The above analysis shows that a new extractant is needed.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention comprises a process to purify ferrous or ferric chloride solutions with high amounts of impurities, especially impurities such as Ca, Na, Ma, V, Cr, Ni, and the like, that cannot be removed by conventional technologies using selective precipitation. The process developed is based on using a selective organic solvent that will selectively extract ferric chloride and leave the impurities in the raffinate. The process can be used for either ferrous or ferric chloride, since the ferrous chloride, if the solution contains any ferrous chloride, must be converted to the ferric chloride form by oxidizing with chloride.
Also, in order to have a high degree of iron recovery, the iron in the raffinate is recovered by a subsequent extraction stage. Final recovery of ferric chloride from the organic solvent is achieved by stripping the solution with pure water.
Since the ultimate aim is to produce high-purity iron oxide in a spray roaster plant, it is also essential to produce a relatively high concentration of ferric chloride in the purified solution. To achieve about 30-35% ferric chloride in the final solution, the impure liquor is concentrated to about 50% ferric chloride by evaporation. Depending upon the final requirement, two to three stages of solvent extraction and two to three stages of evaporation may be used. Each solvent extraction stage may contain as much as fifteen or more cells, consisting of as much as nine cells for extraction and six cells for stripping.
Also, due to very high amounts of impurities, it may be advantageous to introduce an intermediate washing with the water stage. In such a case, each solvent stage will have extraction, washing, and stripping
In order to economize the steam consumption, the multiple effect evaporators may be used.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent upon reference to the following description of the preferred embodiments and to the drawing, wherein corresponding .reference characters indicate corresponding parts in the drawing and wherein:
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a preferred embodiment of the process of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of an alternate preferred embodiment of the processes of the present invention; and
FIG. 3 is a schematic illustration of the leach liquor processing unit employed in the process of the invention. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT Referring to FIG. 1, there is an initial feed solution of FeCl3 provided in line 10 to an evaporation apparatus 12. Condensate from this evaporation apparatus is transported in line 14; the stripping apparatus 16; pure water is added to the condensate in line 18. Ferric chloride solution is transported from the evaporation apparatus 12 in line 20 to an extraction apparatus 22. Organic solvent that is preferably N-octanol is introduced to the extraction apparatus 22 in line 24. The solution is removed from the extraction apparatus 20 in line 26 to the stripping apparatus 16. Solvent is removed from stripping apparatus 16 in line 28 and a pure solution of ferric chloride is removed in liquor line 30. Raffinate is removed from extraction apparatus 22 in line 32 to line 34 and then introduced to evaporation apparatus 36. Condensate is removed from evaporation apparatus 36 in condensate line 38, which connects to strip solution line 40 and strip solution line 42. A feed line 44 connects the evaporation apparatus 36 to an extraction apparatus 46, and organic solvent is introduced to the extraction apparatus 46 through an organic solvent line 48. Line 50 removes solution from the extraction apparatus to a stripping apparatus 52, and there is an off-line 54 from this stripping apparatus as well as a liquor line 56 that connects to the initial feed line 10. A raffinate line 58 connects the extraction apparatus 46 to another extraction apparatus 60, which also is provided with solvent through organic solvent line 62. Line 64 connects extraction apparatus 60 with stripping apparatus 66 that has an off-line 68 and liquor line 34. Raffinate is removed from the extraction apparatus 60 as waste solution in raffinate line 70.
Referring to FIG. 2, in an alternate embodiment ferric chloride is introduced in feed line 72 to evaporation apparatus 74. Condensate is then removed from this evaporation apparatus 74 in condensate line 76 to extractor apparatus 78. There is an organic input line 80 for this extractor apparatus 78 as well as an extractor output line 82, which connects to a washer apparatus 84. A washer output line 86 connects to a stripper apparatus 88 that is outputted to line 80. Condensate is introduced to stripper apparatus 88 in condensate lines 75 and 90, and solution is removed from the stripper apparatus in output line 92 that connects to an evaporator feed line 94 and a liquor output line 96. Line 94 connects to an evaporator 98, which is outputted in line 100 to line 89. Evaporator 98 is also connected to washer apparatus 84 by line 102. For solutions that have a medium range of multiple impurities, it is essential to use one or more washing steps. The number of washing steps would depend upon the nature of the solution and the extent of impurities. Raffinate line 104 comes off the extraction apparatus 78 to connect to line 106 for introduction of solution to another evaporator 108 from which condensate is removed in line 110. Organic solvent is introduced in lines 111 and 112 to extractor apparatus 114 from which solvent is removed in line 116 to washer apparatus 118. Solvent is removed from the washer apparatus 118 in line 120 to a stripper apparatus 122, which is connected to solvent line 112. A condensate line 124 also brings condensate from line 110 to stripper apparatus 122, and a stripper output line 126 to remove solution from the stripper 122. Line 128 removes solution from washer apparatus 118 and is connected with stripper output line 126 to flow into recirculation line 130 which is connected to feed line 72. Washer apparatus 84 is connected by line 132 to washer apparatus 118. Extraction apparatus 114 is connected by raffinate line 134 to recirculation line 136 and to waste solution line 138. Referring to FIG. 3, leach liquor feed line 140 is connected to a leach liquor filter 142. The leach liquor filter output line 144 is connected to leach liquor preheater 146 that is heated by steam provided in steam header 148. Condensate is removed from the preheater 146 in condensate return line 150 and line 152 connects evaporated liquor to chlorination column 154. Chlorine is provided to the chlorination column 154 in chlorine line 156. Chlorinated liquor is removed to a storage tank in line 158 and evaporated material is removed in line 160 to a chlorination scrubber 162. Line 164 recirculates material from the chlorination scrubber 162 to the leach liquor filter output line 144. Chlorination scrubber output line 166 removes liquor to an ilmenite liquor storage tank (not shown) . It was discovered that waste acid derived form the pickling of stainless steel contains a very high amount of nickel and chromium (1-3%) . It seems that solutions can be purified even without the washing step and a revised flow sheet was developed or indicated in FIG. 3. In such a scheme, two independent stages of Mixer-Settler, without the washing stage was selected. N-octanol does not extract iron from aqueous solutions below 270-300 g/1 FeCl3. This means FeCl3 cannot be completely extracted with N-octanol, but above this concentration, it can be used. N-octanol extracts FeCl3 efficiently in the 280-850 g/1 concentration range, while impurities are weakly extracted. The equilibrium extraction curve (the dependence of the concentration of FeCl3 in the organic solvent on the concentration in the aqueous phase) is practically a straight line. Here the Y-axis is expressed as the solution density, which can easily be converted to concentrations, knowing the corresponding concentration of HCl. However, the given information is sufficient to evaluate the extraction. The extraction proceeded well; taking into account the decrease in the volume flow of the water phase, the extraction of V into the
10 organic phase reaches 70-73%. Depending on the concentration of FeCl3 in the feed and water phase, the concentration of FeCl3 in the organic phase can reach 180 g/1. At high concentrations of HCl, the extraction proceeds easily; the final concentration of FeCl3 is 250-260 g/1 (if the organic phase is not already saturated with iron) . If the HCl concentration is low, the raffinate reaches a density of 1,230-1,240 g/1, which corresponds to a FeCl3 of 280-300 g/1. In working with certain solutions (high HCl concentrations, the necessary concentration of the raffinate was 1,165 g/1 (830 g/1 for the opposing organic phase), which was practically without FeCl3. The re-extraction of the water results in a liquor with a concentration of 400 g/1 FeCl3 and higher. During the re-extraction of the condensate containing HCl, the concentration of FeCl3 and the presence of acid in the water phase, which was in equilibrium with the organic phase, limits the FeCl3 in the organic phase, lowering the efficiency of the re-extraction process.
The work with N-octanol has demonstrated the following: l.A sufficiently high-purity of liquor (only traces of impurities) .
2. No problems with evaporation; the rate of striation of the emulsion is good.
3. N-octanol is not volatile at the process temperatures.
11 4. Phase mixing is not significant.
5. A "third phase" is observed only in the first three
(counting the number of extractions of the water phase) stages of the extraction.
6. At high FeCl3 and HCl concentrations in the water phase and temperatures of 20 - 30°C, the solution partially crystallizes; this can be avoided in practice if the the feed is held at 40-45° C before pumping.
7. A washing of the organic phase with a non-volatile liquor is effective.
The waste solution from synthetic rutile production (after • chlorinaton) could be characterized as "impure" with aiig HCl concentration. Here, it was not possible to directly achieve a high-purity liquor, that is, without washing. The washing required a 580 g/1 FeCl3 liquor. That concentration corresponds to the equilibrium concentration of FeCl3 in the water phase in the first stage of extraction. The washing must not be done with a lower concentration of FeCl3, since a significant portion of FeCl3 will enter the water phase and the concentration in the organic phase will fall and the liquor will be lower in FeCl than permissible. In the experiments, the liquor was washed two times. Practically, the industrial process should include three washings. The washings should be returned to the extraction
12 process. The re-extraction with highly acidic condensates is not desirable. If in the process of evaporation it is possible to achieve a condensate lower in HCl concentration and use it in the re-extraction, this would be the better solution to use.
The raffinate, after the first stage of the extraction, is again evaporated. Raffinate-2 is added to the first raffinate to achieve the required extraction of FeCl3. The organic phase, after the second phase after the second extraction, will contain many more impurities than after the first extraction, and must be washed more carefully. In fact, the possible extraction processes are defined by which extraction stage the solutions are sent back to after the first and second washings.
Raffinate-1 is mixed with the recycled and amalgamated solutions after washing and is sent to the evaporator a second time. The condensate is used for the re-extraction. The evaporated solution undergoes seven stages of extraction until the organic phase saturates at 162.5 g/1 FeCl3. Then it undergoes two washings of three stages each. The first stage is the amalgamated solution after I and III washings; the second stage is the final washing with fresh solution. The re- extract-2 is likewise put through five stages with the condensate. The re-extract-2 should reach the same quality as the re-extract-1. Raffinate-2 is divided into two parts; the
13 majority goes into the recycled solution to undergo another extraction of FeCl3, while some is discarded as waste.
The major difficulty in developing the technology is the large concentration of impurities in the solution entering the second extraction. The impurities are nearly half of the FeCl3 concentration. It is difficult to achieve an ultrapure product from that, while simultaneously minimizing washing.
Similar purification of ferrous chloride solution, using the above solvent extraction process can be achieved by first chlorinating ferrous chloride to ferric chloride solution. The exhaust gases are scrubbed with the impure ferrous chloride solution. The exhaust gases are scrubbed with impure ferrous chloride solution to achieve acceptable chlorine emissions.
A system consisting of solvent extraction with/without chlorination and spray roaster acid regeneration is used to produce high-purity Iron oxide. The system is designed and coordinated so that excess condensate water is used as make-up water for the absorber to produce regenerated acid. This will eliminate any wastewater stream and produce 18% or 32% HCl, to produce high concentration acid (above 26% HCl) .
While the present invention has been described in connection with the preferred embodiments of the various figures, it is to be understood that other similar embodiments
14 may be used or modifications and additions may be made to the described embodiment for performing the same function of the present invention without deviating therefrom. Therefore, the present invention should not be limited to any single embodiment, but rather construed in breadth and scope in accordance with the recitation of the appended claims.
15

Claims

What is claimed is:
1. A method of purifying ferric chloride solutions with impurities comprising the steps of:
(a) treating said ferric chloride solution with impurities with an organic solvent selected from an alcohol having from about 4 to about 20 carbon atoms to selectively dissolve the ferric chloride; and
(b) then stripping the organic solvent from the selectively dissolved ferric chloride.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the organic solvent is a normal alcohol .
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the organic solvent has from about 6 to about 10 carbon atoms.
4. The method of claim 3 wherein the organic solvent is N- octanol.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein in step (a) the ferric chloride solution is partially evaporated before addition of the solvent.
16
6. The method of claim 5 wherein in step (a) raffinate is removed after addition of the solvent.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein in step (a) after removal of raffinate, solution is added to the raffinate after which said solution and raffinate is further evaporated.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein steps (a) and (b) are successively repeated a plurality of times.
17
PCT/US1999/004141 1998-02-25 1999-02-25 Solvent extraction of ferric chloride WO1999043408A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA002318823A CA2318823A1 (en) 1998-02-25 1999-02-25 Solvent extraction of ferric chloride

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US7593698P 1998-02-25 1998-02-25
US60/075,936 1998-02-25

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1999043408A1 true WO1999043408A1 (en) 1999-09-02

Family

ID=22128874

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1999/004141 WO1999043408A1 (en) 1998-02-25 1999-02-25 Solvent extraction of ferric chloride

Country Status (2)

Country Link
CA (1) CA2318823A1 (en)
WO (1) WO1999043408A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002002833A2 (en) * 2000-06-19 2002-01-10 Leonid Irineevich Sklokin Preparation of pure ferric chloride from hydrochloric acid solutions by solvent extraction
US6930413B2 (en) 2002-05-24 2005-08-16 Velocity Magnetics, Inc. Linear synchronous motor with multiple time constant circuits, a secondary synchronous stator member and improved method for mounting permanent magnets
CN111526931A (en) * 2017-09-18 2020-08-11 Ifp 新能源公司 Process for separating furans, in particular 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, from dimethyl sulfoxide by liquid-liquid extraction

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
BR112020004357A2 (en) 2017-09-11 2020-09-08 Pharmacosmos Holding A/S iron complex compounds for therapeutic use
MX2024001607A (en) 2021-08-03 2024-02-27 Pharmacosmos Holding As Iron complex compounds for subcutaneous use in therapy of iron deficiency in companion animals.

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3082062A (en) * 1958-11-18 1963-03-19 Rohm & Haas Removal of ferric chloride from ironaluminum chloride solutions
US3451807A (en) * 1966-11-29 1969-06-24 Monsanto Res Corp Solvent extraction process for the recovery of metal values
US3725527A (en) * 1968-09-19 1973-04-03 Kanto Denka Kogyo Kk Process for recovering pure aqueous solution of ferric chloride and aqueous solution of metal chlorides free of ferric chloride from ferrous metal material
US3824161A (en) * 1970-10-08 1974-07-16 Gullspangs Elektrokemiska Ab Method of separating metallic chlorides from an aqueous mixture thereof
US4582691A (en) * 1983-08-25 1986-04-15 Daihachi Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. Process for separating Fe(III) from an aqueous solution of metallic salts and a process for separating Fe(III) from an organic extraction solvent

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3082062A (en) * 1958-11-18 1963-03-19 Rohm & Haas Removal of ferric chloride from ironaluminum chloride solutions
US3451807A (en) * 1966-11-29 1969-06-24 Monsanto Res Corp Solvent extraction process for the recovery of metal values
US3725527A (en) * 1968-09-19 1973-04-03 Kanto Denka Kogyo Kk Process for recovering pure aqueous solution of ferric chloride and aqueous solution of metal chlorides free of ferric chloride from ferrous metal material
US3824161A (en) * 1970-10-08 1974-07-16 Gullspangs Elektrokemiska Ab Method of separating metallic chlorides from an aqueous mixture thereof
US4582691A (en) * 1983-08-25 1986-04-15 Daihachi Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. Process for separating Fe(III) from an aqueous solution of metallic salts and a process for separating Fe(III) from an organic extraction solvent

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2002002833A2 (en) * 2000-06-19 2002-01-10 Leonid Irineevich Sklokin Preparation of pure ferric chloride from hydrochloric acid solutions by solvent extraction
WO2002002833A3 (en) * 2000-06-19 2002-06-27 Leonid Irineevich Sklokin Preparation of pure ferric chloride from hydrochloric acid solutions by solvent extraction
US6930413B2 (en) 2002-05-24 2005-08-16 Velocity Magnetics, Inc. Linear synchronous motor with multiple time constant circuits, a secondary synchronous stator member and improved method for mounting permanent magnets
CN111526931A (en) * 2017-09-18 2020-08-11 Ifp 新能源公司 Process for separating furans, in particular 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, from dimethyl sulfoxide by liquid-liquid extraction
CN111526931B (en) * 2017-09-18 2022-04-12 Ifp 新能源公司 Process for separating furans, in particular 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, from dimethyl sulfoxide by liquid-liquid extraction

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2318823A1 (en) 1999-09-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7282187B1 (en) Recovery of metal values
Ayanda et al. A review of niobium-tantalum separation in hydrometallurgy
Ma et al. Separation of V (IV) and Fe (III) from the acid leach solution of stone coal by D2EHPA/TBP
RU1813111C (en) Process for extracting gallium from industrial solution of sodium aluminate in bayer process
US3006719A (en) Solvent extraction process for separating hafnium from zirconium
CN112662872B (en) Extraction method of oxalic acid-containing solution
US4401531A (en) Process for the production of electrolytic zinc or high purity zinc salts from secondary zinc raw-materials
JP3085549B2 (en) Recovery method of hydrochloric acid and copper sulfate from copper chloride waste liquid
JPS5928616B2 (en) Iridium recovery and purification method
WO1999043408A1 (en) Solvent extraction of ferric chloride
US4261959A (en) Process for extracting ferric iron from an aqueous solution
PL202742B1 (en) Method for electrolytic production of ultra-pure zinc or zinc compounds from zinc primary and secondary raw materials
US4952378A (en) Method for neutralization treatment of sulfuric acid containing iron ions
CA1073566A (en) Process for treating an acid waste liquid
DE69200603T2 (en) Process for the treatment of used nickel-containing etching solutions.
US3870060A (en) Method of removing monovalent inorganic acids from an aqueous solution containing metal salts of the acids
US4446026A (en) Process and solvent for extraction of the chromates present in an aqueous solution
JP4619955B2 (en) Uranium waste treatment method
US3394060A (en) Process for electrolytically regenerating ferric chloride etching solutions
CA1235906A (en) Process for separating antimony from columbium solutions
JPS60227196A (en) Improvement method through which substance inhibiting recovery of uranium and plutonium in fission substance and fission substance to be recovered is separated mutually by reprocessing process
EA024748B1 (en) Process for extracting uranium
CN113213547A (en) Method for recovering copper and iron from etching waste liquid
CN113046557A (en) Comprehensive recycling method for zinc-containing and iron-containing waste hydrochloric acid
JPH0514013B2 (en)

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CA IN US

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2318823

Country of ref document: CA

Ref document number: 2318823

Country of ref document: CA

Kind code of ref document: A

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: IN/PCT/2000/182/KOL

Country of ref document: IN

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 09622994

Country of ref document: US

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase