Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

USRE41943E1 - Glyphosate-resistant plants - Google Patents

Glyphosate-resistant plants Download PDF

Info

Publication number
USRE41943E1
USRE41943E1 US12/633,520 US63352009A USRE41943E US RE41943 E1 USRE41943 E1 US RE41943E1 US 63352009 A US63352009 A US 63352009A US RE41943 E USRE41943 E US RE41943E
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
glyphosate
epsps
seq
sequence
dna fragment
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime, expires
Application number
US12/633,520
Inventor
Bruce Held
Herbert Wilson
Philip E. Dykema
Carol J. Lewnau
Janelle C. Eby
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mertec LLC
Original Assignee
Mertec LLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mertec LLC filed Critical Mertec LLC
Priority to US12/633,520 priority Critical patent/USRE41943E1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of USRE41943E1 publication Critical patent/USRE41943E1/en
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12NMICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C12N15/8271Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance
    • C12N15/8274Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for herbicide resistance
    • C12N15/8275Glyphosate

Definitions

  • This invention relates to glyphosate-resistant transgenic plants and methods of making the same.
  • Glyphosate is a widely used component in herbicides. Glyphosate inhibits 5-enolpyruvyl-3-phosphoshikimic acid synthase (EPSP synthase, or EPSPS), which is involved in the synthesis of aromatic amino acids in plant cells. Inhibition of EPSPS effectively disrupts protein synthesis and thereby kills the affected plant cells. Because glyphosate is non-selective, it kills both weeds and crop plants. Accordingly, there is a need to produce transgenic crop plants that are resistant to glyphosate.
  • EEPSP synthase 5-enolpyruvyl-3-phosphoshikimic acid synthase
  • mutant EPSP synthases that are glyphosate-resistant. These mutant EPSP synthases can be transformed into plants and confer glyphosate-resistance upon the transformed plants. Examples of mutant EPSP synthases and glyphosate-resistant transgenic plants are illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,040,497 and 5,554,798, 5,310,667 and WO 00/66748.
  • chimeric expression vectors include regulatory sequences, such as enhancers or promoters, that are heterologous to the EPSPS genes.
  • regulatory sequences such as enhancers or promoters, that are heterologous to the EPSPS genes.
  • WO 00/66748 fuses enhancers from CaMV 35S, FMV 35S, rice actin 1, rice GOS2, maize polyubiquitin, or barley plastocyanin genes to a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS coding sequence in order to enhance the expression of the glyphosate-resistant EPSPS in transformed plant cells.
  • the expression cassette of the EPSP synthase gene consists of a native EPSPS 5′ regulator sequence, a coding sequence (with or without introns) encoding a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS which includes a native transit peptide, and a native EPSPS 3′ regulatory sequence (such as an EPSPS transcriptional terminator).
  • Suitable sources of EPSP synthase genes include dicotyledonous plants, such as Arabidopsis thaliana, and mono-cotyledonous plants, such as Zea mays, Arabidopsis thaliana has two EPSP synthase genes (epm1 and epm2).
  • the present invention includes use of one or both of mutated epm1 and epm2 to confer resistance to glyphosate.
  • Mutated EPSP synthase genes from Zea mays or other plants can also be used for transforming plant cells to make glyphosate-resistant plants.
  • a DNA fragment which comprises an EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence and a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS coding sequence is introduced into regenerable plant cells.
  • the DNA fragment does not contain a non-EPSPS enhancer.
  • Cells are selected for stable transformation. The selected cells are then used to regenerate glyphosate-resistant, transgenic plants.
  • the DNA fragment used for transformation comprises a modified plant genomic sequence.
  • the unmodified plant genomic sequence comprises at least part of an EPSPS gene, and includes an EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence and a glyphosate-sensitive EPSPS coding sequence (including a chloroplast transit peptide coding sequence).
  • the glyphosate-sensitive EPSPS coding sequence is modified to make the encoded EPSPS glyphosate-resistant.
  • the DNA fragment comprising the modified plant genomic sequence is stably transformed into plant cells, from which glyphosate-resistant plants are regenerated.
  • the DNA fragment used for transformation comprises SEQ ID NO: 2.
  • the DNA fragment used for transformation comprises SEQ ID NO: 4.
  • the DNA fragment comprises SEQ ID NO: 6.
  • any two sequences selected from SEQ ID. NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 4, and SEQ ID NO: 6 are used to transform plant cells.
  • the transgenic plant comprises transformed SEQ ID. NO: 2 and SEQ ID NO: 4.
  • a DNA fragment is introduced into regenerable, glyphosate-sensitive recipient plant cells.
  • the DNA fragment comprises an EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence, and a coding sequence encoding a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS.
  • the EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence is operably linked to the EPSPS coding sequence.
  • the glyphosate-resistant EPSPS includes a chloroplast transit peptide.
  • the DNA fragment does not contain a non-EPSPS enhancer.
  • the recipient plant cells are selected for glyphosate-resistance and stable transformation. The cells thus selected can be used to regenerate glyphosate-resistant plants.
  • a “DNA fragment” may be either linear or circular.
  • the DNA fragment used for transformation is a linear DNA fragment.
  • a “coding sequence” encoding an EPSPS refers to a nucleic acid sequence transcription and translation of which produce a functional EPSPS. The boundaries of the coding sequence are generally determined by a translation start codon at its 5′ end and a translation stop co don at its 3, end.
  • a coding sequence of EPSPS may be a cDNA, or a plant genomic sequence which consists of all of the exons and introns of an EPSPS gene.
  • An EPSPS gene refers to the plant genomic sequence which includes the EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence, the EPSPS coding sequence (including the sequence encoding the chloroplast transit peptide), and the EPSPS 3′ regulatory sequence (such as an EPSPS transcriptional terminator).
  • a “plant genomic sequence” refers to a nucleotide sequence found in the genome of the plant.
  • a chloroplast transit peptide functions post-translationally to direct a polypeptide to chloroplast.
  • Either endogenous or heterologous chloroplast peptides can be used in the present invention.
  • heterologous means derived from a different source
  • endogenous means derived from the same source.
  • the endogenous transit peptide encoded by a native EPSPS gene is used.
  • an EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence refers to a nucleotide sequence located upstream (5′) to the start codon of the EPSPS coding sequence in an EPSPS gene in a plant or plant cell which has not been subject to genetic engineering.
  • the 5′ regulatory sequence generally includes an EPSPS promoter which directs the transcription of the EPSPS gene.
  • the EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence comprises one or more EPSPS enhancers operably linked to the promoter.
  • the 5′ regulatory sequence comprises at least 200 bp.
  • the 5′ regulatory sequence comprises at least 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1,200 or 1,800 bp.
  • An EPSPS 3′ regulatory sequence refers to a nucleotide sequence located downstream (3′) to the stop codon of the EPSPS coding sequence in an EPSPS gene in a plant or plant cell which has not been subject to genetic engineering.
  • the 3, regulatory sequence generally includes a transcription terminator which controls the termination of the transcription of the EPSPS gene.
  • “Operably linked” refers to a juxtaposition of genetic elements, wherein the elements are in a relationship permitting them to operate in the expected manner. For instance, a 5′ regulatory sequence is operably linked to a coding sequence if the 5′ regulatory sequence functions to initiate transcription of the coding sequence.
  • the DNA fragment used for transformation does not include a non-EPSPS enhancer.
  • a “non-EPSPS enhancer” refers to an enhancer which is not used by an EPSPS gene in a plant or plant cell which has not been subject to genetic engineering.
  • Non-EPSPS enhancers include, but are not limited to, enhancers that are associated with CaMV 35S, FMV 35S, rice actin 1, rice GOS2, maize polyubiquitin, or barley plastocyanin genes.
  • a “glyphosate-resistant” cell or plant refers to a cell or plant that can survive or continue to grow in the presence of certain concentrations of glyphosate that typically kill or inhibit the growth of other cells or plants. Growth includes, for instance, photosynthesis, increased rooting, increased height, increased mass, or development of new leaves.
  • a glyphosate-resistant cell can grow and divide on a culture medium containing 50 mg/l or more glyphosate.
  • a glyphosate-resistant cell can grow and divide on a culture medium containing 100 mg/l or more glyphosate, such as 200 mg/l, 300 mg/l or 400 mg/l glyphosate.
  • a glyphosate-resistant cell can grow and divide on a culture medium containing 500 mg/l or more glyphosate, such as 600 mg/l.
  • glyphosate includes any herbicidally effective form of N-phosphonomethylglycine (including any salt thereof) and other forms which result in the production of the glyphosate anion in plants.
  • Regenerable glyphosate-resistant plant cells may be used to regenerate glyphosate-resistant plants.
  • the glyphosate-resistant plant thus regenerated can survive or continue to grow after being sprayed with glyphosate at a rate of 25 g/ha (grams per hectare) or more.
  • the glyphosate-resistant plant thus regenerated can survive or continue to grow after being sprayed with glyphosate at a rate of 50 g/ha or more, such as 100 g/ha, 200 g/ha, 400 g/ha, or 800 g/ha.
  • the glyphosate-resistant plant thus regenerated can survive or continue to grow after being sprayed with glyphosate at a rate of 1000 g/ha or more, such as 2000 g/ha and 3000 g/ha.
  • the spray may preferably be carried out at or after the growth stage of v2, such as v3, v4, v5 or later stages.
  • the regenerated glyphosate-resistant plant can tolerate the spray of glyphosate at between 0.1 M and 0.4 M.
  • a “glyphosate-resistant” EPSPS refers to an EPSPS the expression of which in a plant cell confers glyphosate resistance upon the plant cell.
  • An EPSPS is “glyphosate-sensitive” if it does not confer glyphosate-resistance when being expressed in plant cells.
  • EPSPS mutations have been known to be glyphosate-resistant and capable of conferring glyphosate resistance upon transformed plants.
  • EPSPS of Zea mays (GenBank Accession No. X63374) can be mutated at amino acid residues 102 (substitution of He for Thr) and 106 (substitution of Ser for Pro).
  • EPSPS encoded by epm1 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana can be mutated at amino acid residues 179 (substitution of He for Thr) and 183 (substitution of Ser for Pro).
  • EPSPS encoded by epm2 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana can be mutated at amino acid residues 177 (substitution of He for Thr) and 182 (substitution of Ser for Pro). These mutated EPSPSs are glyphosate-resistant and capable of conferring glyphosate resistance upon transformed plants.
  • Other mutated or modified EPSPSs such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,310,667, 5,866,775, 6,225,114, and 6,248,876, or natural EPSPS variants showing glyphosate-resistance, can be used in the present invention.
  • bacteria-derived, glyphosate-resistant EPSPSs, after fusion with a chloroplast transit peptide can also be used.
  • the DNA fragment comprising the EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence and the glyphosate-resistant EPSPS coding sequence can be stably transformed into a regenerable plant cell.
  • stable transformation refers to integration of the DNA fragment into the genome of the transformed plant cell.
  • the EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence in the DNA fragment used for transformation comprises an EPSPS enhancer and an EPSPS promoter.
  • the DNA fragment used for transformation further comprises an EPSPS 3′ regulatory sequence, such as an EPSPS transcriptional terminator, which is operably linked to the coding sequence encoding the glyphosate-resistant EPSPS.
  • the DNA fragment used for transformation comprises a modified plant genomic sequence that encodes a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS. Without modification, the plant genomic sequence encodes a glyphosate-sensitive EPSPS. Modifications that are capable of converting a glyphosate-sensitive EPSPS to a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS are known in the art.
  • the DNA fragment used for transformation is modified from a plant genomic sequence.
  • the plant genomic sequence comprises an EPSPS regulatory sequence, a coding sequence encoding a glyphosate-sensitive EPSPS which includes a chloroplast transit peptide, and preferably an EPSPS 3, regulatory sequence, such as an EPSPS transcriptional terminator.
  • the genomic sequence may be obtained by fragmenting the genome of a plant of interest, or isolated from bacterial artificial chromosome clones. Other methods for obtaining genomic sequences can also be used, such as PCR or DNA synthesis.
  • the EPSPS-coding sequence in this plant genomic sequence is then subject to nucleotide modification(s) to render the encoded EPSPS glyphosate resistant. Suitable modifications for this purpose, such as nucleotide substitutions, are well known in the art.
  • the DNA fragment comprising the genomic sequence thus modified can be stably transformed into glyphosate-sensitive recipient plant cells. These transformed plant cells are selected for glyphosate resistance and then used to regenerate glyphosate-resistant plants.
  • the recipient plant cells are regenerable. They can be derived from immature embryos or meristematic tissues which contain cells that have not yet terminally differentiated. Juvenile leaf basal regions, immature tassels and gametic cells can be used to provide regenerable recipient cells for Zea mays.
  • the preferred source of recipient cells for soybean includes the immature cotyledon.
  • two or more DNA fragments can be stably transformed into a recipient plant cell.
  • Each of these DNA fragments includes an EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence, a coding sequence encoding a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS which contains a chloroplast transit peptide, and preferably an EPSPS 3′ regulatory sequence (such as an EPSPS transcriptional terminator).
  • EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence a coding sequence encoding a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS which contains a chloroplast transit peptide
  • EPSPS 3′ regulatory sequence such as an EPSPS transcriptional terminator
  • Transformation of plant cells can be carried out using various methods. These methods include, but are not limited to, Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated DNA transfer, PEG or liposome mediated DNA transfer, electroporation, micro-injection, microprojectile or particle bombardment, receptor-mediated DNA transfer, and viral or other vector mediated DNA transfer. Preferably, transformation is carried out using aerosol beam injection as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/450,226, which is incorporated herein by reference.
  • stably transformed plant cells can be performed using methods as appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art.
  • the transformed cells can be grown and selected on media containing glyphosate.
  • the introduced DNA fragment is stably transformed and integrated into a chromosome of the transformed plant cell.
  • assays can be used to confirm stable transformation. Suitable assays include molecular biological assays, such as Southern and Northern Blotting and PCR, or biochemical assays, such as ELISA and Western Blot.
  • plant part assays such as leaf and root assays, or analysis of the phenotype of the whole regenerated plant, can be used to confirm stable transformation.
  • Plants can be regenerated from the selected, stably transformed cells. Progeny can be recovered from the regenerated plants and tested for glyphosate resistance. Seeds or other parts of the regenerated transgenic plants can also be obtained. In one embodiment, glyphosate-resistant plants are made by crossing.
  • the glyphosate-resistant EPSPS coding sequence can be derived from either monocotyledonous or dicotyledonous plants.
  • the representative monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants used in the present invention include, but are not limited to, Oryza sativa, Zea mays, Hordeum vulgare, Triticum aestivum, Avena sativa, turf grasses including species of the genera Poa, Festuca, Lolium, Zoysia, and Cynodon among others, Glycine max, Gossypium hirsutii, Lycopersicum esculentum, Solanum tuberosum, Phaseolus species, Beta vulgaris, and Brassica species.
  • F27K7 and F4L23 Two bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones, F27K7 and F4L23, were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center, DNA Stock Center, at the Ohio State University.
  • F27K7 and F4L23 contain the EPSPS genes found on chromosome 1 and 2 of Arabidopsis thaliana, respectively.
  • the F27K7 clone was digested using Sac II and Bam HI restriction enzymes to produce a 4.7 kb fragment, the sequence of which is shown as SEQ ID NO: 1.
  • the 4.7 kb fragment comprises the complete EPSPS gene (epm1) found on chromosome which includes an EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence (the sequence before nucleotide residue 1290), an EPSPS coding sequence (from nucleotide residue 1290 to nucleotide residue 3729), and an EPSPS 3, regulatory sequence (the sequence after nucleotide residue 3729).
  • the EPSPS coding sequence also encodes a chloroplast transit peptide (from nucleotide residue 1290 to nucleotide residue 1612). The sequence encoding this chloroplast transit peptide can be predicted using the computer program PSORT maintained on the public accessible GenomeNet at Kyoto University, Japan.
  • the 4.7 kb fragment was cloned into a pbluescript II vector (Stratagene), and two nucleotide substitutions were introduced into the EPSPS coding sequence using QuikChange® Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) according to the instructions of the manufacturer.
  • the two nucleotide substitutions are a cytosine to thymine substitution at nucleotide 2007 and a cytosine to thymine substitution at nucleotide 2018.
  • the mutated sequence is shown as SEQ ID NO: 2.
  • the mutated sequence encodes a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS which has, as compared to the EPSPS encoded by SEQ ID NO: 1, a Thr to Ile mutation at amino acid 179 and a Pro to Ser mutation at amino acid 183.
  • the amino acid sequence of the glyphosate-resistant EPSPS is shown as SEQ ID NO: 7.
  • the pbluescript II vector containing SEQ ID NO: 2 is referred to as epm1 vector.
  • the BAC F4L23 clone was digested using Eco RI restriction enzyme to produce a 5.2 kb fragment, the sequence of which is shown as SEQ ID NO: 3.
  • the 5.2 kb fragment comprises the complete EPSPS gene (epm2) from chromosome 2, which includes an EPSPS 5 ′regulatory sequence (the sequence before nucleotide 1515), and EPSPS coding sequence (from nucleotide 1515 to nucleotide 3872), and an EPSPS 3′ regulatory sequence (the sequence after nucleotide 3872).
  • the EPSPS coding sequence also encodes a chloroplast transit peptide (from nucleotide 1515 to nucleotide 1665). The sequence encoding this chloroplast transit peptide can be predicted using the computer program PSORT maintained on the public accessible GenomeNet at Kyoto University, Japan.
  • SEQ ID NO: 4 shows the mutated sequence which has two nucleotide substitutions in the EPSPS coding sequence as compared to SEQ ID NO: 3.
  • the two substitutions are a cytosine to thymine substitution at nucleotide 2134 and a cytosine to thymine substitution at nucleotide 2145.
  • the mutated sequence encodes a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS which has, as compared to the EPSPS encoded by SEQ ID NO: 3, a Thr to Ile mutation at amino acid 178 and a Pro to Ser mutation at amino acid 182.
  • the amino acid sequence of the (putative) glyphosate-resistant EPSPS is shown as SEQ ID: 8.
  • the pbluescript II vector containing SEQ ID NO: 4 is referred to as epm2 vector.
  • the Bam HI/Sac II fragment (SEQ ID NO: 2) of epm1 vector and the Eco RI fragment (SEQ ID NO: 4) of epm2 vector were used to transform soybean embryogenic callus using an aerosol beam injector as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/450,226, which is incorporated herein by reference. These fragments comprised mutant epm1 and mutant epm2 which encode (putative) glyphosate-resistant EPSPSs. These fragments were used either alone or, preferably, together.
  • the transformed tissue was is selected for glyphosate resistance using the method described below.
  • Table 1 shows the composition of B1-30 3Co5My0.01PA medium.
  • the tissue was is then transferred to the same medium but now containing 300 mg/l glyphosate. After a number of passages (up to 5 passages, each passage may last for about a month) on this latter medium, resistant clonal material may be identified. After an optional further few passages on B1-30 3Co5My0.01PA medium but containing 500 mg/l glyphosate, the growing tissue was is transferred to a regeneration media as described in U.S. patent Ser. No. 09/450,226. Regenerated plants were are transferred to pots in a greenhouse. These plants and their progenies were are sprayed with glyphosate at commercial rates, and complete resistance to glyphosate was is expected to be observed. Progenies segregated are expected to segregate 3:1 for glyphosate resistance as would be expected for Mendelian inheritance of a transgene.
  • mutant epm1 such as SEQ ID NO: 2
  • mutant epm2 such as SEQ ID NO: 4
  • a corn (B 73) BAC library was screened with a probe containing a sequence of a corn EPSPS gene published in Genbank accession number X63374 by Incyte Genomics Inc. Four BAC clones were identified. Southern blot analysis indicated that all four clones contained the same EPSPS gene.
  • One BAC clone was further characterized by nucleotide sequencing which resulted in identification of a 6.0 kb genomic fragment flanked by unique Cla I and Eco RV sites. The sequence of the 6.0 kb fragment was shown as SEQ ID NO: 5.
  • the 6.0 kb fragment includes an EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence (the sequence before nucleotide 1868), an EPSPS coding sequence (from nucleotide 1868 to nucleotide 5146), and an EPSPS 3, regulatory sequence (the sequence after nucleotide 5146).
  • the EPSPS coding sequence also encodes a chloroplast transit peptide (from nucleotide 1868 to nucleotide 2041). The sequence encoding this chloroplast transit peptide can be predicted using the computer program PS ORT maintained on the public accessible GenomeNet at Kyoto University, Japan.
  • the 6.0 kb fragment was cloned into the Cla I and Eco RV sites of a pbluescript vector, and then subject to site directed mutagenesis using QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene).
  • Two mutations were introduced into the EPSPS coding sequence: the first mutation being a cytosine to thymine substitution at nucleotide 2886 and the second mutation being a cytosine to thymine substitution at nucleotide 2897.
  • the mutated sequence is shown as SEQ ID NO: 6.
  • the mutations changed the encoded amino acid residue Thr to Ile at position 164 and Pro to Ser at position 168.
  • This mutated EPSPS amino acid sequence is shown as SEQ ID NO: 9.
  • the mutated EPSPS is glyphosate-resistant.
  • the pBluescript vector comprising SEQ ID NO: 6 is referred to as HCEM.
  • the Cla I and Eco RV fragment (SEQ ID NO: 6) of HCEM was introduced into cultured immature corn embryos using an aerosol beam injector according to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/450,226.
  • the Cla I-Eco RV fragment comprised the glyphosate-resistant EPSPS coding sequence.
  • DN62A100RR a medium containing 100 mg/l glyphosate.
  • Table 3 lists the composition of DN62A100RR and other media. After two 14-day passages on DN62A100RR, actively growing tissue was is transferred to DN62A300RR medium which contains 300 mg/l (Table 3). After two 14-day passages on this medium, tissue was finally transferred to DN62540RR medium which contains 540 mg/l glyphosate (Table 3). Stable transformation allowed continued growth on 540 mg/l glyphosate. Regeneration was is carried out as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/450,226.
  • Transformation can also be accomplished using Agrobacterium-mediated DNA delivery.
  • the transformation and regeneration were are performed according to the methods as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/203,679, which is herein incorporated by reference. Briefly, after culturing on DN62A0S20GLC (Table 2) for five days, co-cultivated embryos were are transferred to DN62ALC180RR medium which contains 180 mg/l glyphosate (Table 3). After two 14-day passages on this medium, actively growing tissue was is transferred to DN62540RR medium containing 540 mg/l glyphosate (Table 3). Stable transformation allowed will allow continued growth on 540 mg/l glyphosate. Regeneration was is carried out as described in U.S. Ser. No. 09/203,679.

Landscapes

  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

This invention relates to glyphosate-resistant transgenic plants and methods of making the same. In a preferred embodiment, a DNA fragment which comprises an EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence and a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS coding sequence is introduced into regenerable plant cells. The encoded EPSPS has a chloroplast transit peptide. The DNA fragment does not contain a non-EPSPS enhancer. Cells are selected for stable transformation, and the selected cells can be used to regenerate glyphosate-resistant transgenic plants. The DNA fragment used for transformation preferably comprises a modified plant genomic sequence, such as SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO:4 or SEQ ID NO: 6. In one embodiment, two DNA fragments of this invention are stably transformed into a plant to confer glyphosate-resistance.

Description

TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to glyphosate-resistant transgenic plants and methods of making the same.
BACKGROUND
Glyphosate is a widely used component in herbicides. Glyphosate inhibits 5-enolpyruvyl-3-phosphoshikimic acid synthase (EPSP synthase, or EPSPS), which is involved in the synthesis of aromatic amino acids in plant cells. Inhibition of EPSPS effectively disrupts protein synthesis and thereby kills the affected plant cells. Because glyphosate is non-selective, it kills both weeds and crop plants. Accordingly, there is a need to produce transgenic crop plants that are resistant to glyphosate.
Recombinant DNA technology has been used to create mutant EPSP synthases that are glyphosate-resistant. These mutant EPSP synthases can be transformed into plants and confer glyphosate-resistance upon the transformed plants. Examples of mutant EPSP synthases and glyphosate-resistant transgenic plants are illustrated in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,040,497 and 5,554,798, 5,310,667 and WO 00/66748.
Current plant transformation technology employs chimeric expression vectors. These vectors include regulatory sequences, such as enhancers or promoters, that are heterologous to the EPSPS genes. For instance, WO 00/66748 fuses enhancers from CaMV 35S, FMV 35S, rice actin 1, rice GOS2, maize polyubiquitin, or barley plastocyanin genes to a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS coding sequence in order to enhance the expression of the glyphosate-resistant EPSPS in transformed plant cells.
No one has used a complete expression cassette of the EPSP synthase gene isolated from the genome of a donor plant and mutated to give glyphosate resistance. In one embodiment of the present invention, the expression cassette of the EPSP synthase gene consists of a native EPSPS 5′ regulator sequence, a coding sequence (with or without introns) encoding a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS which includes a native transit peptide, and a native EPSPS 3′ regulatory sequence (such as an EPSPS transcriptional terminator). The fact that such an expression cassette is sufficient to provide glyphosate resistance is surprising. Moreover, the use of the native EPSPS 5′ and/or 3′ regulatory sequences simplifies the process of constructing expression vectors suitable for plant transformation.
Suitable sources of EPSP synthase genes include dicotyledonous plants, such as Arabidopsis thaliana, and mono-cotyledonous plants, such as Zea mays, Arabidopsis thaliana has two EPSP synthase genes (epm1 and epm2). The present invention includes use of one or both of mutated epm1 and epm2 to confer resistance to glyphosate. Mutated EPSP synthase genes from Zea mays or other plants can also be used for transforming plant cells to make glyphosate-resistant plants.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, a DNA fragment which comprises an EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence and a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS coding sequence (including a chloroplast transit peptide coding sequence) is introduced into regenerable plant cells. The DNA fragment does not contain a non-EPSPS enhancer. Cells are selected for stable transformation. The selected cells are then used to regenerate glyphosate-resistant, transgenic plants.
In one embodiment, the DNA fragment used for transformation comprises a modified plant genomic sequence. The unmodified plant genomic sequence comprises at least part of an EPSPS gene, and includes an EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence and a glyphosate-sensitive EPSPS coding sequence (including a chloroplast transit peptide coding sequence). The glyphosate-sensitive EPSPS coding sequence is modified to make the encoded EPSPS glyphosate-resistant. The DNA fragment comprising the modified plant genomic sequence is stably transformed into plant cells, from which glyphosate-resistant plants are regenerated.
In a preferred embodiment, the DNA fragment used for transformation comprises SEQ ID NO: 2. In another preferred embodiment, the DNA fragment used for transformation comprises SEQ ID NO: 4. In yet another preferred embodiment, the DNA fragment comprises SEQ ID NO: 6. In a further preferred embodiment, any two sequences selected from SEQ ID. NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 4, and SEQ ID NO: 6 are used to transform plant cells. In one embodiment, the transgenic plant comprises transformed SEQ ID. NO: 2 and SEQ ID NO: 4.
Other features, objects, and advantages of the present invention are apparent in the detailed description that follows. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, not limitation. Various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the detailed description.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
This invention relates to methods of making glyphosate-resistant plants. In accordance with one aspect of the invention, a DNA fragment is introduced into regenerable, glyphosate-sensitive recipient plant cells. The DNA fragment comprises an EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence, and a coding sequence encoding a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS. The EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence is operably linked to the EPSPS coding sequence. The glyphosate-resistant EPSPS includes a chloroplast transit peptide. The DNA fragment does not contain a non-EPSPS enhancer. The recipient plant cells are selected for glyphosate-resistance and stable transformation. The cells thus selected can be used to regenerate glyphosate-resistant plants. As used herein, a “DNA fragment” may be either linear or circular. Preferably, the DNA fragment used for transformation is a linear DNA fragment. A “coding sequence” encoding an EPSPS refers to a nucleic acid sequence transcription and translation of which produce a functional EPSPS. The boundaries of the coding sequence are generally determined by a translation start codon at its 5′ end and a translation stop co don at its 3, end. A coding sequence of EPSPS may be a cDNA, or a plant genomic sequence which consists of all of the exons and introns of an EPSPS gene. An EPSPS gene refers to the plant genomic sequence which includes the EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence, the EPSPS coding sequence (including the sequence encoding the chloroplast transit peptide), and the EPSPS 3′ regulatory sequence (such as an EPSPS transcriptional terminator). A “plant genomic sequence” refers to a nucleotide sequence found in the genome of the plant.
A chloroplast transit peptide functions post-translationally to direct a polypeptide to chloroplast. Either endogenous or heterologous chloroplast peptides can be used in the present invention. As used herein, “heterologous” means derived from a different source, and “endogenous” means derived from the same source. In a preferred embodiment, the endogenous transit peptide encoded by a native EPSPS gene is used.
As used herein, an EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence refers to a nucleotide sequence located upstream (5′) to the start codon of the EPSPS coding sequence in an EPSPS gene in a plant or plant cell which has not been subject to genetic engineering. The 5′ regulatory sequence generally includes an EPSPS promoter which directs the transcription of the EPSPS gene. Preferably, the EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence comprises one or more EPSPS enhancers operably linked to the promoter. In one embodiment, the 5′ regulatory sequence comprises at least 200 bp. Preferably, the 5′ regulatory sequence comprises at least 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1,200 or 1,800 bp.
An EPSPS 3′ regulatory sequence refers to a nucleotide sequence located downstream (3′) to the stop codon of the EPSPS coding sequence in an EPSPS gene in a plant or plant cell which has not been subject to genetic engineering. The 3, regulatory sequence generally includes a transcription terminator which controls the termination of the transcription of the EPSPS gene.
“Operably linked” refers to a juxtaposition of genetic elements, wherein the elements are in a relationship permitting them to operate in the expected manner. For instance, a 5′ regulatory sequence is operably linked to a coding sequence if the 5′ regulatory sequence functions to initiate transcription of the coding sequence.
Preferably, the DNA fragment used for transformation does not include a non-EPSPS enhancer. As used in the present invention, a “non-EPSPS enhancer” refers to an enhancer which is not used by an EPSPS gene in a plant or plant cell which has not been subject to genetic engineering. Non-EPSPS enhancers include, but are not limited to, enhancers that are associated with CaMV 35S, FMV 35S, rice actin 1, rice GOS2, maize polyubiquitin, or barley plastocyanin genes.
As used herein, a “glyphosate-resistant” cell or plant refers to a cell or plant that can survive or continue to grow in the presence of certain concentrations of glyphosate that typically kill or inhibit the growth of other cells or plants. Growth includes, for instance, photosynthesis, increased rooting, increased height, increased mass, or development of new leaves. In one embodiment, a glyphosate-resistant cell can grow and divide on a culture medium containing 50 mg/l or more glyphosate. Preferably, a glyphosate-resistant cell can grow and divide on a culture medium containing 100 mg/l or more glyphosate, such as 200 mg/l, 300 mg/l or 400 mg/l glyphosate. More preferably, a glyphosate-resistant cell can grow and divide on a culture medium containing 500 mg/l or more glyphosate, such as 600 mg/l. For purposes of the present invention, the term “glyphosate” includes any herbicidally effective form of N-phosphonomethylglycine (including any salt thereof) and other forms which result in the production of the glyphosate anion in plants.
Regenerable glyphosate-resistant plant cells may be used to regenerate glyphosate-resistant plants. In one embodiment, the glyphosate-resistant plant thus regenerated can survive or continue to grow after being sprayed with glyphosate at a rate of 25 g/ha (grams per hectare) or more. Preferably, the glyphosate-resistant plant thus regenerated can survive or continue to grow after being sprayed with glyphosate at a rate of 50 g/ha or more, such as 100 g/ha, 200 g/ha, 400 g/ha, or 800 g/ha. More preferably, the glyphosate-resistant plant thus regenerated can survive or continue to grow after being sprayed with glyphosate at a rate of 1000 g/ha or more, such as 2000 g/ha and 3000 g/ha. The spray may preferably be carried out at or after the growth stage of v2, such as v3, v4, v5 or later stages. In another embodiment, the regenerated glyphosate-resistant plant can tolerate the spray of glyphosate at between 0.1 M and 0.4 M.
As used herein, a “glyphosate-resistant” EPSPS refers to an EPSPS the expression of which in a plant cell confers glyphosate resistance upon the plant cell. An EPSPS is “glyphosate-sensitive” if it does not confer glyphosate-resistance when being expressed in plant cells.
A variety of EPSPS mutations have been known to be glyphosate-resistant and capable of conferring glyphosate resistance upon transformed plants. For instance, EPSPS of Zea mays (GenBank Accession No. X63374) can be mutated at amino acid residues 102 (substitution of He for Thr) and 106 (substitution of Ser for Pro). EPSPS encoded by epm1 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana can be mutated at amino acid residues 179 (substitution of He for Thr) and 183 (substitution of Ser for Pro). EPSPS encoded by epm2 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana can be mutated at amino acid residues 177 (substitution of He for Thr) and 182 (substitution of Ser for Pro). These mutated EPSPSs are glyphosate-resistant and capable of conferring glyphosate resistance upon transformed plants. Other mutated or modified EPSPSs, such as those described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,310,667, 5,866,775, 6,225,114, and 6,248,876, or natural EPSPS variants showing glyphosate-resistance, can be used in the present invention. In addition, bacteria-derived, glyphosate-resistant EPSPSs, after fusion with a chloroplast transit peptide, can also be used.
The DNA fragment comprising the EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence and the glyphosate-resistant EPSPS coding sequence can be stably transformed into a regenerable plant cell. As used herein, stable transformation refers to integration of the DNA fragment into the genome of the transformed plant cell.
In one embodiment, the EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence in the DNA fragment used for transformation comprises an EPSPS enhancer and an EPSPS promoter. In another embodiment, the DNA fragment used for transformation further comprises an EPSPS 3′ regulatory sequence, such as an EPSPS transcriptional terminator, which is operably linked to the coding sequence encoding the glyphosate-resistant EPSPS.
In yet another embodiment, the DNA fragment used for transformation comprises a modified plant genomic sequence that encodes a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS. Without modification, the plant genomic sequence encodes a glyphosate-sensitive EPSPS. Modifications that are capable of converting a glyphosate-sensitive EPSPS to a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS are known in the art.
In a preferred embodiment, the DNA fragment used for transformation is modified from a plant genomic sequence. Before modification, the plant genomic sequence comprises an EPSPS regulatory sequence, a coding sequence encoding a glyphosate-sensitive EPSPS which includes a chloroplast transit peptide, and preferably an EPSPS 3, regulatory sequence, such as an EPSPS transcriptional terminator. The genomic sequence may be obtained by fragmenting the genome of a plant of interest, or isolated from bacterial artificial chromosome clones. Other methods for obtaining genomic sequences can also be used, such as PCR or DNA synthesis.
The EPSPS-coding sequence in this plant genomic sequence is then subject to nucleotide modification(s) to render the encoded EPSPS glyphosate resistant. Suitable modifications for this purpose, such as nucleotide substitutions, are well known in the art. The DNA fragment comprising the genomic sequence thus modified can be stably transformed into glyphosate-sensitive recipient plant cells. These transformed plant cells are selected for glyphosate resistance and then used to regenerate glyphosate-resistant plants.
The recipient plant cells are regenerable. They can be derived from immature embryos or meristematic tissues which contain cells that have not yet terminally differentiated. Juvenile leaf basal regions, immature tassels and gametic cells can be used to provide regenerable recipient cells for Zea mays. The preferred source of recipient cells for soybean includes the immature cotyledon.
In another preferred embodiment, two or more DNA fragments can be stably transformed into a recipient plant cell. Each of these DNA fragments includes an EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence, a coding sequence encoding a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS which contains a chloroplast transit peptide, and preferably an EPSPS 3′ regulatory sequence (such as an EPSPS transcriptional terminator). These DNA fragments can be modified plant genomic sequences. They can be derived from the same or different plant species. They can be derived from the same EPSPS gene, or from different EPSPS genes of the same plant species, such as emp1 and emp2 of Arabidopsis thaliana.
Transformation of plant cells can be carried out using various methods. These methods include, but are not limited to, Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated DNA transfer, PEG or liposome mediated DNA transfer, electroporation, micro-injection, microprojectile or particle bombardment, receptor-mediated DNA transfer, and viral or other vector mediated DNA transfer. Preferably, transformation is carried out using aerosol beam injection as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/450,226, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Selection for stably transformed plant cells can be performed using methods as appreciated by one of ordinary skill in the art. For instance, the transformed cells can be grown and selected on media containing glyphosate. Preferably, the introduced DNA fragment is stably transformed and integrated into a chromosome of the transformed plant cell. A variety of assays can be used to confirm stable transformation. Suitable assays include molecular biological assays, such as Southern and Northern Blotting and PCR, or biochemical assays, such as ELISA and Western Blot. In addition, plant part assays, such as leaf and root assays, or analysis of the phenotype of the whole regenerated plant, can be used to confirm stable transformation.
Plants can be regenerated from the selected, stably transformed cells. Progeny can be recovered from the regenerated plants and tested for glyphosate resistance. Seeds or other parts of the regenerated transgenic plants can also be obtained. In one embodiment, glyphosate-resistant plants are made by crossing.
Both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants can be transformed using the methods of the present invention. The glyphosate-resistant EPSPS coding sequence can be derived from either monocotyledonous or dicotyledonous plants. The representative monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants used in the present invention include, but are not limited to, Oryza sativa, Zea mays, Hordeum vulgare, Triticum aestivum, Avena sativa, turf grasses including species of the genera Poa, Festuca, Lolium, Zoysia, and Cynodon among others, Glycine max, Gossypium hirsutii, Lycopersicum esculentum, Solanum tuberosum, Phaseolus species, Beta vulgaris, and Brassica species.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. Generally, the nomenclature used herein and the laboratory procedures in cell culture and molecular genetics described herein are those well known and commonly employed in the art. Standard techniques can be used for recombinant nucleic acid methods, polynucleotide synthesis, plant cell culture, cell culture, tissue culture, and plant transformation and regeneration. Generally, enzymatic reactions and purification and/or isolation steps are performed according to the manufacturers' specifications. The techniques and procedures are generally performed according to conventional methodology disclosed, for example, in Molecular Cloning A Laboratory Manual, 2d ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (1989), and Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (John Wiley & Sons, Baltimore, Md., 1989).
It should be understood that the above-described embodiments and the following examples are given by way of illustration, not limitation. Various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the present invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the present description.
EXAMPLE 1 Preparation and Mutation of Arabidopsis Genomic Fragments Containing EPSPS Genes
Two bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) clones, F27K7 and F4L23, were obtained from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center, DNA Stock Center, at the Ohio State University. F27K7 and F4L23 contain the EPSPS genes found on chromosome 1 and 2 of Arabidopsis thaliana, respectively. The F27K7 clone was digested using Sac II and Bam HI restriction enzymes to produce a 4.7 kb fragment, the sequence of which is shown as SEQ ID NO: 1. The 4.7 kb fragment comprises the complete EPSPS gene (epm1) found on chromosome which includes an EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence (the sequence before nucleotide residue 1290), an EPSPS coding sequence (from nucleotide residue 1290 to nucleotide residue 3729), and an EPSPS 3, regulatory sequence (the sequence after nucleotide residue 3729). The EPSPS coding sequence also encodes a chloroplast transit peptide (from nucleotide residue 1290 to nucleotide residue 1612). The sequence encoding this chloroplast transit peptide can be predicted using the computer program PSORT maintained on the public accessible GenomeNet at Kyoto University, Japan.
The 4.7 kb fragment was cloned into a pbluescript II vector (Stratagene), and two nucleotide substitutions were introduced into the EPSPS coding sequence using QuikChange® Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. The two nucleotide substitutions are a cytosine to thymine substitution at nucleotide 2007 and a cytosine to thymine substitution at nucleotide 2018. The mutated sequence is shown as SEQ ID NO: 2. The mutated sequence encodes a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS which has, as compared to the EPSPS encoded by SEQ ID NO: 1, a Thr to Ile mutation at amino acid 179 and a Pro to Ser mutation at amino acid 183. The amino acid sequence of the glyphosate-resistant EPSPS is shown as SEQ ID NO: 7. The pbluescript II vector containing SEQ ID NO: 2 is referred to as epm1 vector.
The BAC F4L23 clone was digested using Eco RI restriction enzyme to produce a 5.2 kb fragment, the sequence of which is shown as SEQ ID NO: 3. The 5.2 kb fragment comprises the complete EPSPS gene (epm2) from chromosome 2, which includes an EPSPS 5 ′regulatory sequence (the sequence before nucleotide 1515), and EPSPS coding sequence (from nucleotide 1515 to nucleotide 3872), and an EPSPS 3′ regulatory sequence (the sequence after nucleotide 3872). The EPSPS coding sequence also encodes a chloroplast transit peptide (from nucleotide 1515 to nucleotide 1665). The sequence encoding this chloroplast transit peptide can be predicted using the computer program PSORT maintained on the public accessible GenomeNet at Kyoto University, Japan.
The 5.2 kb fragment was cloned into a pbluescript II vector, and then subject to site-directed mutagenesis using QuikChange® Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene). SEQ ID NO: 4 shows the mutated sequence which has two nucleotide substitutions in the EPSPS coding sequence as compared to SEQ ID NO: 3. The two substitutions are a cytosine to thymine substitution at nucleotide 2134 and a cytosine to thymine substitution at nucleotide 2145. The mutated sequence encodes a glyphosate-resistant EPSPS which has, as compared to the EPSPS encoded by SEQ ID NO: 3, a Thr to Ile mutation at amino acid 178 and a Pro to Ser mutation at amino acid 182. The amino acid sequence of the (putative) glyphosate-resistant EPSPS is shown as SEQ ID: 8. The pbluescript II vector containing SEQ ID NO: 4 is referred to as epm2 vector.
EXAMPLE 2 Transformation of Soybean
The Bam HI/Sac II fragment (SEQ ID NO: 2) of epm1 vector and the Eco RI fragment (SEQ ID NO: 4) of epm2 vector were used to transform soybean embryogenic callus using an aerosol beam injector as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/450,226, which is incorporated herein by reference. These fragments comprised mutant epm1 and mutant epm2 which encode (putative) glyphosate-resistant EPSPSs. These fragments were used either alone or, preferably, together.
The transformed tissue was is selected for glyphosate resistance using the method described below. First, the beamed embryogenic callus was is maintained for one month on B1-30 3Co5My0.01PA medium. Table 1 shows the composition of B1-30 3Co5My0.01PA medium.
TABLE 1
Ingredients in 1 liter B1-30 3Co5My0.10PA Medium (pH 5.8)
MS Salts* 4.43 g
NaEDTA 37.3 mg
2,4 dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 30 mg
Phytagar 8 g
Coconut water 30 ml
Myo-inositol 5 g
Phytic acid 10 mg
*Sigma Plant Culture catalogue, reference M5519
The tissue was is then transferred to the same medium but now containing 300 mg/l glyphosate. After a number of passages (up to 5 passages, each passage may last for about a month) on this latter medium, resistant clonal material may be identified. After an optional further few passages on B1-30 3Co5My0.01PA medium but containing 500 mg/l glyphosate, the growing tissue was is transferred to a regeneration media as described in U.S. patent Ser. No. 09/450,226. Regenerated plants were are transferred to pots in a greenhouse. These plants and their progenies were are sprayed with glyphosate at commercial rates, and complete resistance to glyphosate was is expected to be observed. Progenies segregated are expected to segregate 3:1 for glyphosate resistance as would be expected for Mendelian inheritance of a transgene.
Preferably, both mutant epm1 (such as SEQ ID NO: 2) and mutant epm2 (such as SEQ ID NO: 4) are stably transformed into a plant cell, from which glyphosate-resistant plants can be regenerated.
EXAMPLE 3 Preparation and Mutation of Corn Genomic Fragments Containing EPSPS Gene
A corn (B 73) BAC library was screened with a probe containing a sequence of a corn EPSPS gene published in Genbank accession number X63374 by Incyte Genomics Inc. Four BAC clones were identified. Southern blot analysis indicated that all four clones contained the same EPSPS gene. One BAC clone was further characterized by nucleotide sequencing which resulted in identification of a 6.0 kb genomic fragment flanked by unique Cla I and Eco RV sites. The sequence of the 6.0 kb fragment was shown as SEQ ID NO: 5. The 6.0 kb fragment includes an EPSPS 5′ regulatory sequence (the sequence before nucleotide 1868), an EPSPS coding sequence (from nucleotide 1868 to nucleotide 5146), and an EPSPS 3, regulatory sequence (the sequence after nucleotide 5146). The EPSPS coding sequence also encodes a chloroplast transit peptide (from nucleotide 1868 to nucleotide 2041). The sequence encoding this chloroplast transit peptide can be predicted using the computer program PS ORT maintained on the public accessible GenomeNet at Kyoto University, Japan.
The 6.0 kb fragment was cloned into the Cla I and Eco RV sites of a pbluescript vector, and then subject to site directed mutagenesis using QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene). Two mutations were introduced into the EPSPS coding sequence: the first mutation being a cytosine to thymine substitution at nucleotide 2886 and the second mutation being a cytosine to thymine substitution at nucleotide 2897. The mutated sequence is shown as SEQ ID NO: 6. The mutations changed the encoded amino acid residue Thr to Ile at position 164 and Pro to Ser at position 168. This mutated EPSPS amino acid sequence is shown as SEQ ID NO: 9. The mutated EPSPS is glyphosate-resistant. The pBluescript vector comprising SEQ ID NO: 6 is referred to as HCEM.
EXAMPLE 4 Transformation of Corn
The Cla I and Eco RV fragment (SEQ ID NO: 6) of HCEM was introduced into cultured immature corn embryos using an aerosol beam injector according to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/450,226. The Cla I-Eco RV fragment comprised the glyphosate-resistant EPSPS coding sequence.
Selection was carried out as follows: the beamed embryos were allowed to remain on DN62A0S20G medium for 5 days. Table 2 shows the composition of DN62A0S20G medium.
TABLE 2
Ingredients in 1 liter Culture Medium (pH 5.8)
DN62A0S20G DN62A0S20GLC
N6 Salts* 3.98 g 3.98 g
N6 Vitamins 1 ml 1 ml
Asparagine 800 mg 800 mg
Myoinositol 100 g 100 g
Proline 1400 mg 1400 mg
Casamino acids 100 mg 100 mg
2,4 dichlorophenoxyacetic acid 1 mg 1 mg
Glucose 20 g 20 g
Silver nitrate 10 mg 10 mg
Cefotaxime 0 mg 50 mg
*Sigma Plant Culture catalogue, reference C1416
The beamed embryos were then transferred to DN62A100RR a medium containing 100 mg/l glyphosate. Table 3 lists the composition of DN62A100RR and other media. After two 14-day passages on DN62A100RR, actively growing tissue was is transferred to DN62A300RR medium which contains 300 mg/l (Table 3). After two 14-day passages on this medium, tissue was finally transferred to DN62540RR medium which contains 540 mg/l glyphosate (Table 3). Stable transformation allowed continued growth on 540 mg/l glyphosate. Regeneration was is carried out as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/450,226.
TABLE 3
Ingredients in 1 liter Culture Medium (pH 5.8)
DN62A100R R DN62ALC180R R DN62A300R R DN62540RR
N6 Salts* 3.98 g 3.98 g 3.98 g 3.98 g
N6 Vitamins 1 ml 1 ml 1 ml 1 ml
Asparagine 800 mg 800 mg 800 mg 800 mg
Myoinositol 100 mg 100 mg 100 mg 100 mg
Proline 1400 mg 1400 mg 1400 mg 1400 mg
Casamino acids 100 mg 100 mg 100 mg 100 mg
2,4 1 mg 1 mg 1 mg 1 mg
dichlorophenoxyacetic
acid
Sucrose 20 g 20 g 20 g 20 g
Silver nitrate 10 mg 10 mg 10 mg
Glyphosate 100 mg 180 mg 300 mg 540 mg
Cefotaxime 0 mg 50 mg 0 mg 0 mg
*Sigma Plant Culture catalogue, reference C1416
Transformation can also be accomplished using Agrobacterium-mediated DNA delivery. In this case, the transformation and regeneration were are performed according to the methods as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/203,679, which is herein incorporated by reference. Briefly, after culturing on DN62A0S20GLC (Table 2) for five days, co-cultivated embryos were are transferred to DN62ALC180RR medium which contains 180 mg/l glyphosate (Table 3). After two 14-day passages on this medium, actively growing tissue was is transferred to DN62540RR medium containing 540 mg/l glyphosate (Table 3). Stable transformation allowed will allow continued growth on 540 mg/l glyphosate. Regeneration was is carried out as described in U.S. Ser. No. 09/203,679.
Resistance to glyphosate in regenerants was is confirmed by spraying them with glyphosate at commercial rates. Seed from the regenerants segregated is expected to segregate 3:1 for resistance as would be expected with Mendelian inheritance of a transgene. Seeds from backcrossed individuals segregated are expected to segregate 1:1. Corn transformation may also be accomplished by other means including, for example, particle bombardment or electroporation of competent cells.

Claims (13)

1. A method of making a glyphosate-resistant plant cell, comprising:
(a) introducing a first DNA fragment into a plurality of regenerable plant cells, the first DNA fragment comprising a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 4 and SEQ ID NO: 6; and
(b) selecting from said regenerable plant cells a glyphosate-resistant plant cell which is stably transformed with the first DNA fragment.
2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising introducing a second DNA fragment with the first DNA fragment into said regenerable plant cells, wherein the second DNA fragment comprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 1, SEQ ID NO: 4 and SEQ ID NO: 6, and the sequence of the first DNA fragment is different from the sequence of the second DNA fragment.
3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the first DNA fragment comprises SEQ ID NO: 2, and the second DNA fragment comprises SEQ ID NO: 4.
4. A glyphosate-resistant plant cell made according to the method of claim 3, which is stably transformed with said first DNA fragment and said second DNA fragment.
5. A plant regenerated from the glyphosate-resistant plant cell of claim 4.
6. A regenerable, glyphosate-resistant plant cell comprising an introduced, chromosomally integrated DNA sequence which comprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 4 and SEQ ID NO: 6.
7. The glyphosate-resistant plant cell according to claim 6, comprising another introduced, chromosomally integrated DNA sequence, wherein said another introduced, integrated DNA sequence comprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 2, SEQ ID NO: 4 and SEQ ID NO: 6.
8. The glyphosate-resistant plant cell according to claim 6, wherein the introduced, chromosomally integrated DNA sequence comprises SEQ ID NO: 2, and wherein the plant cell comprises another introduced, chromosomally integrated DNA sequence which comprises SEQ ID NO: 4.
9. A plant regenerated from the glyphosate-resistant plant cell of claim 6.
10. A plant regenerated from the glyphosate-resistant plant cell of claim 8.
11. An isolated polynucleotide comprising the sequence depicted in SEQ ID NO: 2.
12. An isolated polynucleotide comprising the sequence depicted in SEQ ID NO: 4.
13. An isolated polynucleotide comprising the sequence depicted in SEQ ID NO: 6.
US12/633,520 2002-08-19 2009-12-08 Glyphosate-resistant plants Expired - Lifetime USRE41943E1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/633,520 USRE41943E1 (en) 2002-08-19 2009-12-08 Glyphosate-resistant plants

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/223,241 US7045684B1 (en) 2002-08-19 2002-08-19 Glyphosate-resistant plants
US12/633,520 USRE41943E1 (en) 2002-08-19 2009-12-08 Glyphosate-resistant plants

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/223,241 Reissue US7045684B1 (en) 2002-08-19 2002-08-19 Glyphosate-resistant plants

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
USRE41943E1 true USRE41943E1 (en) 2010-11-16

Family

ID=36318093

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/223,241 Ceased US7045684B1 (en) 2002-08-19 2002-08-19 Glyphosate-resistant plants
US11/409,909 Expired - Lifetime US7626077B2 (en) 2002-08-19 2006-04-24 Glyphosate-resistant plants
US12/633,520 Expired - Lifetime USRE41943E1 (en) 2002-08-19 2009-12-08 Glyphosate-resistant plants

Family Applications Before (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/223,241 Ceased US7045684B1 (en) 2002-08-19 2002-08-19 Glyphosate-resistant plants
US11/409,909 Expired - Lifetime US7626077B2 (en) 2002-08-19 2006-04-24 Glyphosate-resistant plants

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (3) US7045684B1 (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2013025400A1 (en) 2011-08-17 2013-02-21 Stine Seed Farm, Inc. Maize event hcem485, compositions and methods for detecting and use thereof
US9018451B2 (en) 2010-12-03 2015-04-28 M S Technologies, LLC Optimized expression of glyphosate resistance encoding nucleic acid molecules in plant cells

Families Citing this family (53)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7045684B1 (en) 2002-08-19 2006-05-16 Mertec, Llc Glyphosate-resistant plants
US7737326B2 (en) * 2005-04-29 2010-06-15 Midwest Oil Seeds Inc. EPSPS promoter from maize
PT2465340E (en) * 2006-01-12 2015-03-11 Cibus Europe Bv Epsps mutants
JP2009536819A (en) * 2006-05-12 2009-10-22 コモンウェルス サイエンティフィック アンド インダストリアル リサーチ オーガニゼイション Enzymes for breaking down herbicides
US9045765B2 (en) * 2006-06-09 2015-06-02 Athenix Corporation EPSP synthase genes conferring herbicide resistance
WO2007146980A2 (en) * 2006-06-13 2007-12-21 Athenix Corporation Improved epsp synthases: compositions and methods of use
AU2008305568B2 (en) 2007-09-27 2013-11-21 Corteva Agriscience Llc Engineered zinc finger proteins targeting 5-enolpyruvyl shikimate-3-phosphate synthase genes
CN101932701A (en) 2008-02-01 2010-12-29 阿森尼克斯公司 The orthogenesis of GRG31 and GRG36 EPSP synthase
US7807791B2 (en) * 2008-03-03 2010-10-05 Ms Technologies Llc Antibodies immunoreactive with mutant 5-enolpyruvlshikimate-3-phosphate synthase
WO2010102293A1 (en) 2009-03-06 2010-09-10 Metabolix, Inc. Method of positive plant selection using sorbitol dehydrogenase
EP2478105A1 (en) 2009-09-15 2012-07-25 Metabolix, Inc. Generation of high polyhydroxybutrate producing oilseeds
AU2011289286B2 (en) 2010-08-13 2015-02-12 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Methods and compositions for targeting sequences of interest to the chloroplast
WO2012074868A2 (en) 2010-12-03 2012-06-07 Ms Technologies, Llc Optimized expression of glyphosate resistance encoding nucleic acid molecules in plant cells
BR112013015745B1 (en) 2010-12-03 2021-01-19 Ms Technologies, Llc polynucleotides related to the herbicide tolerance event 8291.45.36.2, expression cassette, probe, as well as processes for event identification, zygosity determination, production of a transgenic soy plant and production of a protein in a plant cell
CN107529548B (en) 2010-12-03 2021-05-04 陶氏益农公司 Stacked herbicide tolerance event 8264.44.06.1, related transgenic soybean lines, and detection thereof
US8648230B2 (en) 2011-03-18 2014-02-11 Ms Technologies, Llc Regulatory regions preferentially expressing in non-pollen plant tissue
US9150625B2 (en) 2011-05-23 2015-10-06 E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company Chloroplast transit peptides and methods of their use
EP2731419A4 (en) 2011-07-13 2015-04-29 Dow Agrosciences Llc Stacked herbicide tolerance event 8264.42.32.1, related transgenic soybean lines, and detection thereof
CA2844101A1 (en) 2011-08-03 2013-02-07 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Methods and compositions for targeted integration in a plant
US20140182011A1 (en) 2011-11-03 2014-06-26 The University Of Hong Kong Methods Using Acyl-Coenzyme A-Binding Proteins to Enchance Drought Tolerance in Genetically Modified Plants
AR089793A1 (en) 2012-01-27 2014-09-17 Du Pont METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS TO GENERATE COMPOSITE TRANSGENIC RISK LOCUS
AR090417A1 (en) 2012-02-01 2014-11-12 Dow Agrosciences Llc GLIFOSATO RESISTANT PLANTS AND ASSOCIATED METHODS
AU2013205557B2 (en) 2012-04-17 2016-04-21 Corteva Agriscience Llc Synthetic brassica-derived chloroplast transit peptides
WO2013184768A1 (en) 2012-06-05 2013-12-12 University Of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc. Compositions and methods of gene silencing in plants
US20150211019A1 (en) 2012-08-13 2015-07-30 University Of Georgia Research Foundation, Inc. Compositions and Methods for Increasing Pest Resistance in Plants
US11773400B2 (en) 2013-08-22 2023-10-03 E.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Methods for producing genetic modifications in a plant genome without incorporating a selectable transgene marker, and compositions thereof
CN106687594A (en) 2014-07-11 2017-05-17 纳幕尔杜邦公司 Compositions and methods for producing plants resistant to glyphosate herbicide
RU2017112324A (en) 2014-09-12 2018-10-15 Пайонир Хай-Бред Интернэшнл, Инк. CREATION OF WEBSITES OF SITE-SPECIFIC INTEGRATION FOR COMPLEX SIGNS LOCUSES IN CORN AND SOY, AND ALSO WAYS OF APPLICATION
MX2017010746A (en) 2015-02-25 2017-11-28 Pioneer Hi Bred Int Composition and methods for regulated expression of a guide rna/cas endonuclease complex.
US11492632B2 (en) 2015-03-19 2022-11-08 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Methods and compositions for accelerated trait introgression
US11174467B2 (en) 2015-04-08 2021-11-16 Yield10 Bioscience, Inc. Plants with enhanced yield and methods of construction
US20190136248A1 (en) 2015-05-15 2019-05-09 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Novel guide rna/cas endonuclease systems
BR112018008134A2 (en) 2015-10-20 2018-11-06 Pioneer Hi Bred Int method for restoring the function of a non-functional gene product in the genome of a cell, method for editing a nucleotide sequence in the genome of a cell, plant or progeny plant, method for editing a nucleotide sequence in the genome of a cell without the use of A Modified Polynucleotide Mold and Method for Delivering a Guide RNA / Endonuclease Cas Complex to a Cell
BR112018007796A2 (en) 2015-11-06 2018-10-30 Du Pont soybean plants, soybean plant parts or soybean seeds, method of selecting a soybean cell, methods of selecting a soybean cell and producing a locus and nucleic acid molecule
WO2017136668A1 (en) 2016-02-04 2017-08-10 Yield10 Bioscience, Inc. Transgenic land plants comprising a putative bicarbonate transporter protein of an edible eukaryotic algae
WO2017155717A1 (en) 2016-03-11 2017-09-14 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Novel cas9 systems and methods of use
WO2017155715A1 (en) 2016-03-11 2017-09-14 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Novel cas9 systems and methods of use
WO2017155714A1 (en) 2016-03-11 2017-09-14 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Novel cas9 systems and methods of use
WO2017218185A1 (en) 2016-06-14 2017-12-21 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Use of cpf1 endonuclease for plant genome modifications
US20190100745A1 (en) 2016-06-20 2019-04-04 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Novel cas systems and methods of use
CA3029271A1 (en) 2016-06-28 2018-01-04 Cellectis Altering expression of gene products in plants through targeted insertion of nucleic acid sequences
CA3054060C (en) 2017-02-22 2023-09-26 Yield10 Bioscience, Inc. Transgenic land plants comprising enhanced levels of mitochondrial transporter protein
US20200407737A1 (en) 2017-05-03 2020-12-31 KWS SAAT SE & Co. KGaA Use of crispr-cas endonucleases for plant genome engineering
US20190093117A1 (en) 2017-07-31 2019-03-28 R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company Methods and compositions for viral-based gene editing in plants
EP3846615A4 (en) 2018-09-04 2022-05-25 Yield10 Bioscience, Inc. Genetically engineered land plants that express an increased seed yield protein and/or an increased seed yield rna
CN109762827A (en) * 2019-01-30 2019-05-17 重庆市农业科学院 The mutated gene and its expression vector of a kind of artificial synthesized resistance glyphosate and application
BR112021026220A2 (en) 2019-06-25 2022-02-15 Inari Agriculture Tech Inc Enhanced genome editing by homology-dependent repair
CN112094857B (en) * 2020-10-14 2022-05-06 江苏省农业科学院 Rape EPSPS gene containing three mutation sites and cloning method and application thereof
WO2024036190A2 (en) 2022-08-09 2024-02-15 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Guide polynucleotide multiplexing
WO2024123786A1 (en) 2022-12-06 2024-06-13 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Methods and compositions for co-delivery of t-dnas expressing multiple guide polynucleotides into plants
WO2024158934A1 (en) 2023-01-24 2024-08-02 Yale University Compositions and methods for controlling t-dna copy number in transformed plants
WO2024166076A1 (en) 2023-02-10 2024-08-15 King Abdullah University Of Science And Technology Recombinant production of antimicrobial peptides in planta
WO2024196921A1 (en) 2023-03-20 2024-09-26 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Cas polypeptides with altered pam recognition

Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4535060A (en) 1983-01-05 1985-08-13 Calgene, Inc. Inhibition resistant 5-enolpyruvyl-3-phosphoshikimate synthetase, production and use
US4940835A (en) 1985-10-29 1990-07-10 Monsanto Company Glyphosate-resistant plants
US5310667A (en) 1989-07-17 1994-05-10 Monsanto Company Glyphosate-tolerant 5-enolpyruvyl-3-phosphoshikimate synthases
WO1995006128A2 (en) 1993-08-25 1995-03-02 Dekalb Genetics Corporation Fertile, transgenic maize plants and methods for their production
US5491288A (en) 1991-03-05 1996-02-13 Rhone Poulenc Agrochimie Chimeric gene comprising the arabidopsis histone H4 promoter for the transformation of plants
US5510471A (en) 1991-03-05 1996-04-23 Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie Chimeric gene for the transformation of plants
US5554798A (en) 1990-01-22 1996-09-10 Dekalb Genetics Corporation Fertile glyphosate-resistant transgenic corn plants
WO1997004103A2 (en) 1995-07-19 1997-02-06 Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie Mutated 5-enol pyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase, gene coding for said protein and transformed plants containing said gene
GB2326163A (en) 1997-05-28 1998-12-16 Zeneca Ltd In situ modification of plant genes
USRE36449E (en) 1991-03-05 1999-12-14 Rhone-Poulenc Agro Chimeric gene for the transformation of plants
US6040497A (en) 1997-04-03 2000-03-21 Dekalb Genetics Corporation Glyphosate resistant maize lines
WO2000066748A1 (en) 1999-04-29 2000-11-09 Syngenta Limited Herbicide resistant plants
US7626077B2 (en) 2002-08-19 2009-12-01 Mertec Llc Glyphosate-resistant plants

Patent Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4535060A (en) 1983-01-05 1985-08-13 Calgene, Inc. Inhibition resistant 5-enolpyruvyl-3-phosphoshikimate synthetase, production and use
US4769061A (en) 1983-01-05 1988-09-06 Calgene Inc. Inhibition resistant 5-enolpyruvyl-3-phosphoshikimate synthase, production and use
US4940835A (en) 1985-10-29 1990-07-10 Monsanto Company Glyphosate-resistant plants
US5310667A (en) 1989-07-17 1994-05-10 Monsanto Company Glyphosate-tolerant 5-enolpyruvyl-3-phosphoshikimate synthases
US5554798A (en) 1990-01-22 1996-09-10 Dekalb Genetics Corporation Fertile glyphosate-resistant transgenic corn plants
US5510471A (en) 1991-03-05 1996-04-23 Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie Chimeric gene for the transformation of plants
US5491288A (en) 1991-03-05 1996-02-13 Rhone Poulenc Agrochimie Chimeric gene comprising the arabidopsis histone H4 promoter for the transformation of plants
US5633448A (en) 1991-03-05 1997-05-27 Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie Chimeric gene for the transformation of plants
USRE36449E (en) 1991-03-05 1999-12-14 Rhone-Poulenc Agro Chimeric gene for the transformation of plants
WO1995006128A2 (en) 1993-08-25 1995-03-02 Dekalb Genetics Corporation Fertile, transgenic maize plants and methods for their production
WO1997004103A2 (en) 1995-07-19 1997-02-06 Rhone-Poulenc Agrochimie Mutated 5-enol pyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase, gene coding for said protein and transformed plants containing said gene
US6040497A (en) 1997-04-03 2000-03-21 Dekalb Genetics Corporation Glyphosate resistant maize lines
GB2326163A (en) 1997-05-28 1998-12-16 Zeneca Ltd In situ modification of plant genes
WO2000066748A1 (en) 1999-04-29 2000-11-09 Syngenta Limited Herbicide resistant plants
US7626077B2 (en) 2002-08-19 2009-12-01 Mertec Llc Glyphosate-resistant plants

Non-Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Benefy et al. 1988 The Plant Cell 2:849-856.
Green 2009 Weed Science 57:108-117.
Hernandez-Garcia et al. "A soybean (glycine max) polyubiquitin promoter gives strong constitutive expression in transgenic soybean" Plant Cell REp (2009) 28:837-849.
Klee et al. 1986, Mol. Gen. Genet. 210:437-442.
Ku et al, Jan. 1999, Nature Biotechnology vol. 17, pp. 76-80.
Richmond and Somerville 2000, Plant Physiology vol. 124, pp. 495-498.
Richmond et al. "The cellulose synthase superfamily" Plant Physiology, vol. 124, pp. 495-498 Oct. 2000.
Rose et al., Mar. 2008, The Plant Cell. vol. 20 pp. 543-551.
Ruff et al "Effects of amino acid substitutions on glyphosate tolerance and activity of EPSPS Synthase" Plant Physiology, vol. 96 (Supp. 1) p. 94, 1991.

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9018451B2 (en) 2010-12-03 2015-04-28 M S Technologies, LLC Optimized expression of glyphosate resistance encoding nucleic acid molecules in plant cells
WO2013025400A1 (en) 2011-08-17 2013-02-21 Stine Seed Farm, Inc. Maize event hcem485, compositions and methods for detecting and use thereof

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7626077B2 (en) 2009-12-01
US7045684B1 (en) 2006-05-16
US20060225147A1 (en) 2006-10-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
USRE41943E1 (en) Glyphosate-resistant plants
JP6689904B2 (en) Plant control element and its use
CN107630031B (en) Method and system for regulating and controlling plant fertility
EP1827078B1 (en) Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits
JP2003516753A5 (en)
EP2292773A1 (en) Genes and uses for plant improvement
CA3080022A1 (en) Modified plants with enhanced traits
WO2019129145A1 (en) Flowering time-regulating gene cmp1 and related constructs and applications thereof
US20230128674A1 (en) Transgenic plants with enhanced traits
CN112204144B (en) Abiotic stress tolerant plants and methods of use
CN104093840A (en) Methods for improving crop yield
US20230313212A1 (en) Plastid transformation by complementation of nuclear mutations
CN104911191B (en) A kind of sterility changing gene FG3 and its application
US20110271399A1 (en) Method of selecting dna constructs for herbicide tolerance in plants
USRE39685E1 (en) Method for shortening internode of inflorescence by introducing gene for petunia transcription factor petSPL2
CN113817033B (en) Application of ZmELF3.1 protein and its functional deletion mutant in regulating and controlling crop aerial root number or layer number
CN115466747A (en) Glycosyltransferase ZmKOB1 gene and application thereof in regulating and controlling maize ear fructification character or development
WO2018228348A1 (en) Methods to improve plant agronomic trait using bcs1l gene and guide rna/cas endonuclease systems
US11479785B2 (en) Plants having altered agronomic characteristics under nitrogen limiting conditions and related constructs and methods involving abiotic stress tolerance genes
CN106434744B (en) Application of gibberellin biosynthetic enzyme in early plant maturation
JP2024531291A (en) Methods for modifying plastid genomes
AU2022386267A1 (en) Compositions and methods for altering plant determinacy
US7829690B2 (en) Regulatory DNA elements from Agrobacterium vitis S4
CN114174518A (en) Abiotic stress tolerant plants and methods

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553)

Year of fee payment: 12