US9268605B2 - Mechanism for facilitating sliding window resource tracking in message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in an on-demand services environment - Google Patents
Mechanism for facilitating sliding window resource tracking in message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in an on-demand services environment Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US9268605B2 US9268605B2 US13/841,713 US201313841713A US9268605B2 US 9268605 B2 US9268605 B2 US 9268605B2 US 201313841713 A US201313841713 A US 201313841713A US 9268605 B2 US9268605 B2 US 9268605B2
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- time
- job
- job type
- resources
- thread resources
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active, expires
Links
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 50
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 84
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 10
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 27
- 230000015654 memory Effects 0.000 claims description 22
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000004931 aggregating effect Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 abstract description 14
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 37
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 33
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 31
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 description 27
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 17
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 12
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000026676 system process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000002085 persistent effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013468 resource allocation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 241000699670 Mus sp. Species 0.000 description 2
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000003642 hunger Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006855 networking Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000037351 starvation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012384 transportation and delivery Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 241001522296 Erithacus rubecula Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000699666 Mus <mouse, genus> Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000295 complement effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007596 consolidation process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013523 data management Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001934 delay Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011010 flushing procedure Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007274 generation of a signal involved in cell-cell signaling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004973 liquid crystal related substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007787 long-term memory Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/06—Buying, selling or leasing transactions
- G06Q30/08—Auctions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
- G06F21/30—Authentication, i.e. establishing the identity or authorisation of security principals
- G06F21/31—User authentication
- G06F21/40—User authentication by quorum, i.e. whereby two or more security principals are required
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/46—Multiprogramming arrangements
- G06F9/50—Allocation of resources, e.g. of the central processing unit [CPU]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for program control, e.g. control units using stored programs, i.e. using an internal store of processing equipment to receive or retain programs
- G06F9/46—Multiprogramming arrangements
- G06F9/50—Allocation of resources, e.g. of the central processing unit [CPU]
- G06F9/5005—Allocation of resources, e.g. of the central processing unit [CPU] to service a request
- G06F9/5027—Allocation of resources, e.g. of the central processing unit [CPU] to service a request the resource being a machine, e.g. CPUs, Servers, Terminals
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L41/00—Arrangements for maintenance, administration or management of data switching networks, e.g. of packet switching networks
- H04L41/30—Decision processes by autonomous network management units using voting and bidding
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L43/00—Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
- H04L43/08—Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/50—Queue scheduling
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/70—Admission control; Resource allocation
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L47/00—Traffic control in data switching networks
- H04L47/70—Admission control; Resource allocation
- H04L47/83—Admission control; Resource allocation based on usage prediction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2209/00—Indexing scheme relating to G06F9/00
- G06F2209/50—Indexing scheme relating to G06F9/50
- G06F2209/508—Monitor
Definitions
- 61/700,032 entitled “Adaptive, Tiered, and Multi-Tenant Routing Framework for Workload Scheduling” by Xiaodan Wang, et al., filed Sep. 12, 2012
- U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/700,037 entitled “Sliding Window Resource Tracking in Message Queue” by Xiaodan Wang, et al., filed Sep. 12, 2012, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference and priority is claimed thereof.
- One or more implementations relate generally to data management and, more specifically, to a mechanism for facilitating sliding window resource tracking in message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in an on-demand services environment.
- a message refers to a unit of work that is performed on an application server.
- Messages can be grouped into any number of types, such as roughly 300 types, ranging from user facing work such as refreshing a report on the dashboard to internal work, such as deleting unused files.
- messages exhibit wide variability in the amount of resources they consume including thread time. This can lead to starvation by long running messages, which deprive short messages from receiving their fair share of thread time. When this impacts customer-facing work, such as dashboard or apex futures, customers are likely to dislike and complain when faced with performance degradation.
- a user of such a conventional system typically retrieves data from and stores data on the system using the user's own systems.
- a user system might remotely access one of a plurality of server systems that might in turn access the database system.
- Data retrieval from the system might include the issuance of a query from the user system to the database system.
- the database system might process the request for information received in the query and send to the user system information relevant to the request.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a computing device employing a thread resource management mechanism according to one embodiment
- FIG. 2 illustrates a thread resource management mechanism including workload scheduling and routing logic according to one embodiment
- FIG. 3 illustrates an architecture for facilitating sliding window resource tracking in message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in a multi-tenant environment in an on-demand services environment according to one embodiment
- FIG. 4A illustrates a method for facilitating sliding window resource tracking in message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in a multi-tenant environment in an on-demand services environment according to one embodiment
- FIG. 4B illustrates a transaction sequence for facilitating sliding window resource tracking in message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in a multi-tenant environment in an on-demand services environment according to one embodiment
- FIG. 4C illustrates a transaction sequence for facilitating sliding window resource tracking in message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in a multi-tenant environment in an on-demand services environment according to one embodiment
- FIG. 5 illustrates a computer system according to one embodiment
- FIG. 6 illustrates an environment wherein an on-demand database service might be used according to one embodiment
- FIG. 7 illustrates elements of environment of FIG. 6 and various possible interconnections between these elements according to one embodiment.
- a method includes monitoring, in real-time, in-flight jobs in message queues for incoming jobs from organizations in a distributed environment having application servers in communication over a network, applying local sliding windows to the message queues to estimate wait time associated with each incoming job in a message queue.
- a local sliding window may include segment of time being monitored in each message queue for estimating the wait time.
- the method may further include allocating, in real-time, based on the estimated wait time, thread resources to one or more of the incoming jobs associated with the one or more of the organizations.
- inventions encompassed within this specification may also include embodiments that are only partially mentioned or alluded to or are not mentioned or alluded to at all in this brief summary or in the abstract.
- embodiments of the invention may have been motivated by various deficiencies with the prior art, which may be discussed or alluded to in one or more places in the specification, the embodiments of the invention do not necessarily address any of these deficiencies.
- different embodiments of the invention may address different deficiencies that may be discussed in the specification. Some embodiments may only partially address some deficiencies or just one deficiency that may be discussed in the specification, and some embodiments may not address any of these deficiencies.
- a method includes monitoring, in real-time, in-flight jobs in message queues for incoming jobs from organizations in a distributed environment having application servers in communication over a network, applying local sliding windows to the message queues to estimate wait time associated with each incoming job in a message queue.
- a local sliding window may include segment of time being monitored in each message queue for estimating the wait time.
- the method may further include allocating, in real-time, based on the estimated wait time, thread resources to one or more of the incoming jobs associated with the one or more of the organizations.
- Embodiments provide for 1) globally-consistent tracking of resources built on top of the metering framework, 2) sliding window aggregation of statistics with configurable look-back period, 3) added support for minimum/maximum aggregation operations in metering, 4) novel method for estimating queuing time by organization and message type, 5) solution for set-oriented aggregation of non-numeric values in a distributed environment, and 6) solution for tracking thread status of long running messages using memcached distributed cache.
- a term multi-tenant database system refers to those systems in which various elements of hardware and software of the database system may be shared by one or more customers. For example, a given application server may simultaneously process requests for a great number of customers, and a given database table may store rows for a potentially much greater number of customers.
- the term query plan refers to a set of steps used to access information in a database system.
- Embodiments are described with reference to an embodiment in which techniques for facilitating management of data in an on-demand services environment are implemented in a system having an application server providing a front end for an on-demand database service capable of supporting multiple tenants, embodiments are not limited to multi-tenant databases nor deployment on application servers. Embodiments may be practiced using other database architectures, i.e., ORACLE®, DB2® by IBM and the like without departing from the scope of the embodiments claimed.
- FIG. 1 illustrates a computing device 100 employing a thread resource management mechanism 110 according to one embodiment.
- computing device 100 serves as a host machine employing a thread resource management mechanism (“resource mechanism”) 110 for message queues for facilitating dynamic management of application server thread resources facilitating fair and efficient management of thread resources and their corresponding messages, including their tracking, allocation, routing, etc., for providing better management of system resources as well as promoting user-control and customization of various services typically desired or necessitated by a user (e.g., a company, a corporation, an organization, a business, an agency, an institution, etc.).
- the user refers to a customer of a service provider (e.g., Salesforce.com) that provides and manages resource mechanism 110 at a host machine, such as computing device 100 .
- a service provider e.g., Salesforce.com
- Computing device 100 may include server computers (e.g., cloud server computers, etc.), desktop computers, cluster-based computers, set-top boxes (e.g., Internet-based cable television set-top boxes, etc.), and the like.
- Computing device 100 may also include smaller computers, such as mobile computing devices, such as cellular phones including smartphones (e.g., iPhone® by Apple®, BlackBerry® by Research in Motion®, etc.), handheld computing devices, personal digital assistants (PDAs), etc., tablet computers (e.g., iPad® by Apple®, Galaxy® by Samsung®, etc.), laptop computers (e.g., notebooks, netbooks, UltrabookTM, etc.), e-readers (e.g., Kindle® by Amazon.com®, Nook® by Barnes and Nobles®, etc.), Global Positioning System (GPS)-based navigation systems, etc.
- GPS Global Positioning System
- Computing device 100 includes an operating system (OS) 106 serving as an interface between any hardware or physical resources of the computing device 100 and a user.
- OS operating system
- Computing device 100 further includes one or more processors 102 , memory devices 104 , network devices, drivers, or the like, as well as input/output (I/O) sources 108 , such as touchscreens, touch panels, touch pads, virtual or regular keyboards, virtual or regular mice, etc.
- I/O input/output
- FIG. 2 illustrates a thread resource management mechanism 110 including workload scheduling and routing logic 252 according to one embodiment.
- thread resource management mechanism (“resource management”) 110 includes sliding window maintenance logic (“window logic”) 272 to provide a novel instrumentation for adaptive, tiered, and multitenant routing framework for workload scheduling for routing traffic in a queue infrastructure to facilitate a range of novel, multi-tenant features and further to allow for dynamic allocation of message queue resources and isolate traffic from competing organizations and scale out by sharing messages across multiple brokers.
- window logic sliding window maintenance logic
- resource mechanism 110 may include various components, such as administrative framework 200 including request reception and authentication logic 202 , analyzer 204 , communication/access logic 206 , and compatibility logic 208 .
- Resource mechanism 110 further includes additional components, such as processing framework 210 having resource allocation logic 212 , auction-based resource sharing logic 232 , quorum-based broker health logic 252 , workload scheduling routing logic 262 , and sliding window maintenance logic 272 .
- resource mechanism 110 any number and type of components may be added to and/or removed from resource mechanism 110 to facilitate various embodiments including adding, removing, and/or enhancing certain features.
- resource mechanism 110 many of the standard and/or known components, such as those of a computing device, are not shown or discussed here. It is contemplated that embodiments are not limited to any particular technology, topology, system, architecture, and/or standard and are dynamic enough to adopt and adapt to any future changes.
- resource mechanism 110 may be in communication with database 280 to store data, metadata, tables, reports, etc., relating to messaging queues, etc. Resource mechanism 110 may be further in communication with any number and type of client computing devices, such as client computing device 290 over network 285 .
- client computing devices such as client computing device 290 over network 285 .
- logic may be interchangeably referred to as “framework” or “component” or “module” and may include, by way of example, software, hardware, and/or any combination of software and hardware, such as firmware.
- resource mechanism 110 facilitates user-based control and manipulation of particular data products/software applications (e.g., social websites, business websites, word processing, spreadsheets, database products, etc.) to be manipulated, shared, communicated, and displayed in any number and type of formats as desired or necessitated by user and communicated through user interface 294 at client computing device 292 and over network 290 .
- data products/software applications e.g., social websites, business websites, word processing, spreadsheets, database products, etc.
- a user may include an administrative user or an end-user.
- An administrative user may include an authorized and/or trained user, such as a system administrator, a software developer, a computer programmer, etc.
- an end-user may be any user that can access a client computing device, such as via a software application or an Internet browser.
- a user via user interface 294 at client computing device 290 , may manipulate or request data as well as view the data and any related metadata in a particular format (e.g., table, spreadsheet, etc.) as desired or necessitated by the user.
- Examples of users may include, but are not limited to, customers (e.g., end-user) or employees (e.g., administrative user) relating to organizations, such as organizational customers (e.g., small and large businesses, companies, corporations, academic institutions, government agencies, non-profit organizations, etc.) of a service provider (e.g., Salesforce.com).
- customers e.g., end-user
- employees e.g., administrative user
- organizations e.g., small and large businesses, companies, corporations, academic institutions, government agencies, non-profit organizations, etc.
- Salesforce.com e.g., Salesforce.com
- resource mechanism 110 may be employed at a server computing system, such as computing device 100 of FIG. 1 , and may be in communication with one or more client computing devices, such as client computing device 290 , over a network, such as network 285 (e.g., a cloud-based network, the Internet, etc.).
- a user may include an organization or organizational customer, such as a company, a business, etc., that is a customer to a provider (e.g., Salesforce.com®) that provides access to resource mechanism 110 (such as via client computer 290 ).
- a user may further include an individual or a small business, etc., that is a customer of the organization/organizational customer and accesses resource mechanism 110 via another client computing device.
- Client computing device 290 may be the same as or similar to computing device 100 of FIG. 1 and include a mobile computing device (e.g., smartphones, tablet computers, etc.) or larger computers (e.g., desktop computers, server computers, etc.).
- resource mechanism 110 facilitates fair and efficient management of message routing and queues for efficient management of system resources, such as application servers, etc., and providing better customer service, where the users may accessing these services via user interface 294 provided through any number and type of software applications (e.g., websites, etc.) employing social and business networking products, such as Chatter® by Salesforce.com, Facebook®, LinkedIn®, etc.
- software applications e.g., websites, etc.
- social and business networking products such as Chatter® by Salesforce.com, Facebook®, LinkedIn®, etc.
- request reception and authentication logic 202 may be used to receive a request (e.g., print a document, move a document, merge documents, run a report, display data, etc.) placed by a user via client computing device 290 over network 285 . Further, request reception and authentication logic 202 may be used to authenticate the received request as well as to authenticate the user (and/or the corresponding customer) and/or computing device 290 before the user is allowed to place the request.
- a request e.g., print a document, move a document, merge documents, run a report, display data, etc.
- the authentication process may be a one-time process conducted when computing device 290 is first allowed access to resource mechanism 110 or, in some embodiments, authentication may be a recurring process that is performed each time a request is received by request reception and authentication logic 202 at resource mechanism 110 at the cloud-based server computing device via network 285 .
- Communication/access logic 206 facilitates communication between the server computing device hosting resource mechanism 110 and other computing devices including computing device 290 and other client computing devices (capable of being accessed by any number of users/customers) as well as other server computing devices.
- Compatibility logic 208 facilitates dynamic compatibility between computing devices (e.g., computing device 290 ), networks (e.g., network 285 ), any number and type of software packages (e.g., websites, social networking sites, etc.).
- Window logic 272 provides a sliding window framework for tracking resource utilization in message queues that allows for improved real-time reporting and traffic analysis. Using this resource tracking framework, more responsive monitoring tools are employed providing self-managing throttling and scheduling algorithms to address and eliminate message starvation. Window logic 272 facilitates usage estimation (e.g., thread time consumed or waiting times by organization or message type, etc.) and resource tracking at a much smaller granularity (e.g., per organization and per message type) and finer time scale (e.g., 5 minute intervals). This technique may be used to determine: 1) the amount of resources an organization consumed during a time period, such as past 10 minutes; and, 2) the estimated completion time of an organization's messages given the current rate of processing.
- usage estimation e.g., thread time consumed or waiting times by organization or message type, etc.
- resource tracking at a much smaller granularity (e.g., per organization and per message type) and finer time scale (e.g., 5 minute intervals). This technique may be used to
- window logic 272 includes in-flight job monitor (“monitor”) 276 for usage tracking and estimation module to track and estimate resource usage relating to each application server, such as by measuring the thread time used by each application server and/or by simply reading a report on measured thread time and queuing time of each message processed by an application server.
- the report may be obtained from mem-cache 287 where it may be stored by the application server once it is prepared by it.
- These measurements may be aggregated, by memcached-based sliding window resource utilization aggregator (“aggregator”) 276 , across the entire POD and grouped by time intervals, such as 5 minute time intervals, in a sliding window manner.
- aggregator memcached-based sliding window resource utilization aggregator
- Aggregator 276 may further track a number of unique organization and message type combinations that are encountered at each application server as well as provide a novel solution for tracking threads of long running (e.g., hours or even days) messages, also in mem-cache 287 which includes tenant and job type history (“history”) 289 to store the relevant data and metadata.
- mem-cache 287 which includes tenant and job type history (“history”) 289 to store the relevant data and metadata.
- Embodiments provide a novel mechanism to track thread usage in order to support fair scheduling of tasks from competing message types and organizations.
- the following statistics may be tracked: 1) thread time (also referred to as “wall clock time”) for each message type and organization combination, which is the amount of time spent executing the handler for messages of a given type and the corresponding organization; 2) time spent waiting on the queue for each message type and organization combination, which estimates how much time messages of a given type and organization spent waiting to be dequeued and processed; 3) a number of messages processed for each message type and organization combination; 4) a list of distinct organization and message type combinations whose messages are still waiting on the queue; and 5) a list of long-running, in-flight messages that have yet to completed.
- an estimation of these measures may be sufficient for fair scheduling and upon scaling reliably and aggregating these measurements over a defined time period, such as 5 minutes intervals, the measurements may be stored at mem-cache 287 , serving as a transient storage, for subsequent use and consumption.
- the statistics may be aggregated across the entire POD (e.g., all application servers participating in the message queue dequeue cluster) and grouped into time windows (e.g., 5 minute time windows) over a rolling time span, such as 30 minute rolling span of time, where aggregation over the entire POD may include one or more of sum, maximum, minimum, and set union operations.
- metering may be used to complement workload logic 272 to aggregating across app servers, bucketing statistics by time interval, and persisting in mem-cache 287 , etc., and further to track dequeue latency, thread time, and number of messages processed on a per organization, per message type basis using metering, etc. Further, bucketing time may be done in 5 minute intervals and the statistics are aggregated within each interval, where metering may be extended with support for minimum/maximum aggregation.
- long-running tracker 278 may be used to track long-running messages (e.g., tens of minutes to hours long) that span multiple time intervals, such as multiple 5 minute time intervals. To account for any potential underestimation of thread time, this, a list of in-flight messages that have been running for more than 30 seconds may be tracked. Periodically, application servers may report a list of in-flight messages that have been running for longer than a defined period of time, such as 30 seconds, to mem-cache 287 . This list may be bounded by a number of database nodes and once a long-running message completes, the corresponding message is removed from the list in mem-cache 287 .
- long-running messages e.g., tens of minutes to hours long
- time intervals such as multiple 5 minute time intervals.
- a cluster or node combination refers to a consolidation of multiple databases (“database node” or simply “node”), such as Real Application Cluster (RAC®) node by Oracle®.
- database node such as Real Application Cluster (RAC®) node by Oracle®.
- RAC may provide a database technology for scaling databases, where a RAC node may include a database computing host that processes database queries from various worker hosts. Further, the list of in-flight messages may be partitioned by application server identifiers to avoid contention and merge the list of messages from all applications servers upon read.
- tracking resource utilization may include sliding window, such as a global sliding window digest (“global digest”) 304 of FIG. 3 , to segment time into fixed time windows, such as fixed 5 minute windows or intervals, such that, for example, the relevant statistics reported by each application server are aggregated and tallied within the same five minute window. Further, a look-back period is maintained to have sufficient data or statistics in history 289 at mem-cache 287 to provide, for example, a 30-minute look-back interval (or at most 7 windows) on which to base fair usage scheduling decisions.
- a global sliding window digest (“global digest”) 304 of FIG. 3 , to segment time into fixed time windows, such as fixed 5 minute windows or intervals, such that, for example, the relevant statistics reported by each application server are aggregated and tallied within the same five minute window.
- a look-back period is maintained to have sufficient data or statistics in history 289 at mem-cache 287 to provide, for example, a 30-minute look-back interval (or at most 7 windows) on which to base fair
- Monitor 274 continues to monitor and track thread time when the handler is first called for a message and on handler completion, the elapsed time is tallied and reported to history 289 .
- Each thread time is tagged with a combination of organization and message types and the current time window.
- the thread time may then be summed for all messages from the same organization/message type combination while the intermediate sum may be cached locally. Every minute (e.g., configurable), the local sum may be flushed to history 289 at mem-cache 287 by adding the global sum (e.g., aggregated from all application servers) with the local sum.
- mem-cache 287 may be maintained for each organization/message type combination, where a value may denote the sum of thread time over all application servers. Similar to thread time, a number of messages may be tracked and processed per organization/message type combination for each window; for example, a message may be counted during the time window in which it completes processing.
- fair usage may be based on two inputs for each organization/message type combination, including: 1) an amount of thread time consumed; and 2) a length of time messages have been waiting in the queue.
- the latter may be using a combination of longest waiters (for messages that have been starved for a long time) and dequeue latency of each message dequeued (for messages that are processed quickly).
- Longest waiters are determined by querying the broker for the oldest messages on each queue.
- estimating queuing time for messages may be obtained that may not show up on the longest waiters list (e.g., if longest waiters are queried for every 5 minutes but each message wait, on average, less than 1 minute on the queue before being processed).
- unique organization/message type combinations that are encountered during each 5 minute interval are tracked using monitor 274 and aggregator 276 by appending to existing set, read and merge sets, and periodic flushing, etc., where the aggregated data corresponding to each application server, merged lists, etc., are provided to and stored at history 289 .
- a reporting period is employed, where after a defined period of time (e.g., every 30 seconds), a thread on an application iterates through a list of in-flight messages such that those messages that have been running for longer than 30 seconds are found and reported to history 289 with a cache key consisting of the app server and thread identifiers.
- a defined period of time e.g., every 30 seconds
- Each item may include organization type, message type, and message start time, etc., and this list may be bounded to, for example, a maximum of two messages per rac node.
- Tracking of long-running in-flight message is performed by monitor 274 and may further include updating the list such that once a long running message completes, any reference to the message is removed from the corresponding list in history 289 by overwriting (e.g., asynchronously) the existing list. Tracking further includes reading and merging lists, where a read method (which takes as input a list of all application servers in the dequeue cluster) merges the list of in-flight messages from various application servers and return a list consisting of all long-running messages across the entire POD.
- a read method which takes as input a list of all application servers in the dequeue cluster
- the thread time may be underestimated or overestimated for a given organization/message type combination, because a race may occur between reading from and writing to the in-flight messages and the thread time from metering.
- only long-running (>30 seconds) in-flight messages may be tracked such that a vast majority of messages may not be double counted.
- a threshold is defined within which statistics tracking is triggered; for example, with a 5 minute threshold, tracking may not be triggered and statistics may not be reported until a queue experiences a dequeue latency of 5 minutes or more. This threshold allows prevention of unnecessary overhead when fair usage may not be required (e.g., when there are minimal delays in the queue) or shutting off statistics tracking entirely (e.g., using a high threshold).
- FIG. 3 illustrates an architecture 300 for facilitating sliding window resource tracking in message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in a multi-tenant environment in an on-demand services environment according to one embodiment.
- architecture 300 includes a memcached distribution cache 287 in communication with worker host 308 which is in communication with tenant 302 that includes an organization and places a job request with worker host 308 via a user interface (e.g., user interface 294 of FIG. 2 ) using a client computing device (e.g., client computing device 290 of FIG. 2 ).
- a worker host may include or be associated with an application server and may include or be associated with a server computing device serving as a host machine, such as host machine 100 (hosting resource mechanism 110 ) of FIG. 1 .
- tenant 302 submits job requests for performance of jobs with worker host 308 .
- This triggers a local sliding window digest 306 to perform sliding window technique-based analysis of the requested job placed by tenant 302 and determine the amount of resources available to or consumed by tenant 302 , etc.
- Worker host 308 maintains communication with resource utilization aggregator 276 , facilitating global sliding window digest 304 , to exchange the information relating to the overall or global resource availability/consumption as well as local resource availability/consumption relating to this tenant 302 .
- fair allocation of resources is performed, including setting aside sufficient resources for performing one or more jobs requested by tenant 302 .
- the requested jobs are performed by job execution engine 278 and any information relating to resource usage of active threads is communicated to monitor 274 and further forwarded on to history 289 .
- FIG. 4A illustrates a method 400 for facilitating sliding window resource tracking in message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in a multi-tenant environment in an on-demand services environment according to one embodiment.
- Method 400 may be performed by processing logic that may comprise hardware (e.g., circuitry, dedicated logic, programmable logic, etc.), software (such as instructions run on a processing device), or a combination thereof.
- method 400 may be performed by thread resource management mechanism 110 of FIG. 1 .
- Method 400 described a process relating to estimating queue time by tenant involving window logic 272 of FIG. 2 .
- Method 400 begins at block 402 with notification of completion of a tenant's job with a set of enqueue (“ENQ”) and completion time (“CT”) and the process continues with iterating over each sliding window that overlaps the job's ENQ and CT at block 404 .
- ENQ earliest job enqueue time
- LDEQ last job dequeue time
- GAP queuing time gap
- a determination is made as to whether the new job overlaps any of the prior jobs in the window. If ENQ is less than or equal to EENQ, at block 410 , a full containment is performed for the queue where the job waited for an entire window, where LDEQ equals CT, and GAP equals zero at block 412 .
- ENQ is greater than EENQ, and ENQ is less than LDEQ
- the partial overlap with one or more prior jobs is detected at block 418 , where LDEQ equals CT, and GAP remains unchanged at block 420 , and the estimated queuing time is determined to be LDEQ ⁇ EENQ ⁇ GAP at block 422 .
- ENQ is greater than or equal to LDEQ
- no overlap with the prior jobs is completed in this window at block 414 , where LDEQ equals CT, and GAP equals GAP+(ENQ ⁇ LDEQ).
- FIG. 4B illustrates a transaction sequence 430 for facilitating sliding window resource tracking in message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in a multi-tenant environment in an on-demand services environment according to one embodiment.
- Transaction sequence 430 may be performed by processing logic that may comprise hardware (e.g., circuitry, dedicated logic, programmable logic, etc.), software (such as instructions run on a processing device), or a combination thereof.
- processing logic may comprise hardware (e.g., circuitry, dedicated logic, programmable logic, etc.), software (such as instructions run on a processing device), or a combination thereof.
- transaction sequence 430 may be performed by thread resource management mechanism 110 of FIG. 1 .
- Transaction sequence 430 describes a transaction relating to reporting of resources consumed by a job involving workload logic 262 of FIG. 2 .
- transaction sequence 430 includes a job execution engine 278 notifying a job fetched for execution 432 to local digest 306 where queuing time (e.g., time spent waiting on queue) for tenant is estimated 434 , whereas the job is executed 436 at job execution engine 278 . Any information relating to completion of the job and the resources consumed on that completion is notified and provided 438 to local digest 306 .
- the resources consumed for the tenant are aggregated 440 at local digest 306 . Any tenant resource consumed as reported from memcached distributed cache are fetched 442 from global digest 304 to local digest 306 .
- the resources consumed are tallied with a value in mem-cache at the global digest 304 , and the local digest value is reset 444 . If there is a conflict with another worker host when updating the global digest 304 , the information is fetched again and updated accordingly and the process is retried 446 at local digest 306 . The update and other relevant information is provided to tenant and job type history 289 where it is added to the list of tenant and jobs encountered and the local list is reset 448 .
- FIG. 4C illustrates a transaction sequence 450 for facilitating sliding window resource tracking in message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in a multi-tenant environment in an on-demand services environment according to one embodiment.
- Transaction sequence 450 may be performed by processing logic that may comprise hardware (e.g., circuitry, dedicated logic, programmable logic, etc.), software (such as instructions run on a processing device), or a combination thereof.
- processing logic may comprise hardware (e.g., circuitry, dedicated logic, programmable logic, etc.), software (such as instructions run on a processing device), or a combination thereof.
- transaction sequence 450 may be performed by thread resource management mechanism 110 of FIG. 1 .
- Transaction sequence 430 describes a transaction relating to tracking of in-flight jobs involving in-flight job monitor 274 of workload logic 262 of FIG. 2 .
- job execution engine 278 provides notification of a job fetched for execution 452 to in-flight job monitor 274 as well as a list of active threads is fetched 454 to monitor 274 .
- long running, in-flight jobs are filtered by processing time and grouped by tenant and job type 456 .
- a report including information relating to resources consumed by long running jobs is provided 460 to global digest 304 .
- Various long running jobs associated with any number of worker hosts are aggregated 462 at global digest 304 .
- a notification of job completion is provided 464 from job execution engine 278 to monitor 274 where the completed job is dropped from the list of long running jobs 466 .
- An updated list of long running jobs 468 is provided to global digest 304 .
- FIG. 5 illustrates a diagrammatic representation of a machine 500 in the exemplary form of a computer system, in accordance with one embodiment, within which a set of instructions, for causing the machine 500 to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein, may be executed.
- Machine 500 is the same as or similar to computing device 100 and computing device 290 of FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 , respectively.
- the machine may be connected (e.g., networked) to other machines in a network (such as host machine 100 of FIG. 1 connected with client machine 290 over network 285 of FIG.
- the machine may operate in the capacity of a server or a client machine in a client-server network environment, or as a peer machine in a peer-to-peer (or distributed) network environment or as a server or series of servers within an on-demand service environment, including an on-demand environment providing multi-tenant database storage services.
- Certain embodiments of the machine may be in the form of a personal computer (PC), a tablet PC, a set-top box (STB), a Personal Digital Assistant (PDA), a cellular telephone, a web appliance, a server, a network router, switch or bridge, computing system, or any machine capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine.
- PC personal computer
- PDA Personal Digital Assistant
- a cellular telephone a web appliance
- server a network router, switch or bridge, computing system
- machine shall also be taken to include any collection of machines (e.g., computers) that individually or jointly execute a set (or multiple sets) of instructions to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein.
- the exemplary computer system 500 includes a processor 502 , a main memory 504 (e.g., read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, dynamic random access memory (DRAM) such as synchronous DRAM (SDRAM) or Rambus DRAM (RDRAM), etc., static memory such as flash memory, static random access memory (SRAM), volatile but high-data rate RAM, etc.), and a secondary memory 518 (e.g., a persistent storage device including hard disk drives and persistent multi-tenant data base implementations), which communicate with each other via a bus 530 .
- Main memory 504 includes emitted execution data 524 (e.g., data emitted by a logging framework) and one or more trace preferences 523 which operate in conjunction with processing logic 526 and processor 502 to perform the methodologies discussed herein.
- main memory 504 e.g., read-only memory (ROM), flash memory, dynamic random access memory (DRAM) such as synchronous DRAM (SDRAM) or Rambus DRAM (RDRAM), etc., static memory such as
- Processor 502 represents one or more general-purpose processing devices such as a microprocessor, central processing unit, or the like. More particularly, the processor 502 may be a complex instruction set computing (CISC) microprocessor, reduced instruction set computing (RISC) microprocessor, very long instruction word (VLIW) microprocessor, processor implementing other instruction sets, or processors implementing a combination of instruction sets. Processor 502 may also be one or more special-purpose processing devices such as an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA), a digital signal processor (DSP), network processor, or the like. Processor 502 is configured to execute the processing logic 526 for performing the operations and functionality of thread resource management mechanism 110 as described with reference to FIG. 1 and other figures discussed herein.
- ASIC application specific integrated circuit
- FPGA field programmable gate array
- DSP digital signal processor
- the computer system 500 may further include a network interface card 508 .
- the computer system 500 also may include a user interface 510 (such as a video display unit, a liquid crystal display (LCD), or a cathode ray tube (CRT)), an alphanumeric input device 512 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 514 (e.g., a mouse), and a signal generation device 516 (e.g., an integrated speaker).
- the computer system 500 may further include peripheral device 536 (e.g., wireless or wired communication devices, memory devices, storage devices, audio processing devices, video processing devices, etc.
- the computer system 500 may further include a Hardware based API logging framework 534 capable of executing incoming requests for services and emitting execution data responsive to the fulfillment of such incoming requests.
- the secondary memory 518 may include a machine-readable storage medium (or more specifically a machine-accessible storage medium) 531 on which is stored one or more sets of instructions (e.g., software 522 ) embodying any one or more of the methodologies or functions of thread resource management mechanism 110 as described with reference to FIG. 1 and other figures described herein.
- the software 522 may also reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 504 and/or within the processor 502 during execution thereof by the computer system 500 , the main memory 504 and the processor 502 also constituting machine-readable storage media.
- the software 522 may further be transmitted or received over a network 520 via the network interface card 508 .
- the machine-readable storage medium 531 may include transitory or non-transitory machine-readable storage media.
- Portions of various embodiments may be provided as a computer program product, which may include a computer-readable medium having stored thereon computer program instructions, which may be used to program a computer (or other electronic devices) to perform a process according to the embodiments.
- the machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, floppy diskettes, optical disks, compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), and magneto-optical disks, ROM, RAM, erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM), electrically EPROM (EEPROM), magnet or optical cards, flash memory, or other type of media/machine-readable medium suitable for storing electronic instructions.
- the techniques shown in the figures can be implemented using code and data stored and executed on one or more electronic devices (e.g., an end station, a network element).
- electronic devices store and communicate (internally and/or with other electronic devices over a network) code and data using computer-readable media, such as non-transitory computer-readable storage media (e.g., magnetic disks; optical disks; random access memory; read only memory; flash memory devices; phase-change memory) and transitory computer-readable transmission media (e.g., electrical, optical, acoustical or other form of propagated signals—such as carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals).
- non-transitory computer-readable storage media e.g., magnetic disks; optical disks; random access memory; read only memory; flash memory devices; phase-change memory
- transitory computer-readable transmission media e.g., electrical, optical, acoustical or other form of propagated signals—such as carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals.
- such electronic devices typically include a set of one or more processors coupled to one or more other components, such as one or more storage devices (non-transitory machine-readable storage media), user input/output devices (e.g., a keyboard, a touchscreen, and/or a display), and network connections.
- the coupling of the set of processors and other components is typically through one or more busses and bridges (also termed as bus controllers).
- bus controllers also termed as bus controllers
- the storage device of a given electronic device typically stores code and/or data for execution on the set of one or more processors of that electronic device.
- one or more parts of an embodiment may be implemented using different combinations of software, firmware, and/or hardware.
- FIG. 6 illustrates a block diagram of an environment 610 wherein an on-demand database service might be used.
- Environment 610 may include user systems 612 , network 614 , system 616 , processor system 617 , application platform 618 , network interface 620 , tenant data storage 622 , system data storage 624 , program code 626 , and process space 628 .
- environment 610 may not have all of the components listed and/or may have other elements instead of, or in addition to, those listed above.
- Environment 610 is an environment in which an on-demand database service exists.
- User system 612 may be any machine or system that is used by a user to access a database user system.
- any of user systems 612 can be a handheld computing device, a mobile phone, a laptop computer, a work station, and/or a network of computing devices.
- user systems 612 might interact via a network 614 with an on-demand database service, which is system 616 .
- An on-demand database service such as system 616
- system 616 is a database system that is made available to outside users that do not need to necessarily be concerned with building and/or maintaining the database system, but instead may be available for their use when the users need the database system (e.g., on the demand of the users).
- Some on-demand database services may store information from one or more tenants stored into tables of a common database image to form a multi-tenant database system (MTS).
- MTS multi-tenant database system
- “on-demand database service 616 ” and “system 616 ” will be used interchangeably herein.
- a database image may include one or more database objects.
- Application platform 618 may be a framework that allows the applications of system 616 to run, such as the hardware and/or software, e.g., the operating system.
- on-demand database service 616 may include an application platform 618 that enables creation, managing and executing one or more applications developed by the provider of the on-demand database service, users accessing the on-demand database service via user systems 612 , or third party application developers accessing the on-demand database service via user systems 612 .
- the users of user systems 612 may differ in their respective capacities, and the capacity of a particular user system 612 might be entirely determined by permissions (permission levels) for the current user. For example, where a salesperson is using a particular user system 612 to interact with system 616 , that user system has the capacities allotted to that salesperson. However, while an administrator is using that user system to interact with system 616 , that user system has the capacities allotted to that administrator.
- users at one permission level may have access to applications, data, and database information accessible by a lower permission level user, but may not have access to certain applications, database information, and data accessible by a user at a higher permission level. Thus, different users will have different capabilities with regard to accessing and modifying application and database information, depending on a user's security or permission level.
- Network 614 is any network or combination of networks of devices that communicate with one another.
- network 614 can be any one or any combination of a LAN (local area network), WAN (wide area network), telephone network, wireless network, point-to-point network, star network, token ring network, hub network, or other appropriate configuration.
- LAN local area network
- WAN wide area network
- telephone network wireless network
- point-to-point network star network
- token ring network token ring network
- hub network or other appropriate configuration.
- TCP/IP Transfer Control Protocol and Internet Protocol
- User systems 612 might communicate with system 616 using TCP/IP and, at a higher network level, use other common Internet protocols to communicate, such as HTTP, FTP, AFS, WAP, etc.
- HTTP HyperText Transfer Protocol
- user system 612 might include an HTTP client commonly referred to as a “browser” for sending and receiving HTTP messages to and from an HTTP server at system 616 .
- HTTP server might be implemented as the sole network interface between system 616 and network 614 , but other techniques might be used as well or instead.
- the interface between system 616 and network 614 includes load sharing functionality, such as round-robin HTTP request distributors to balance loads and distribute incoming HTTP requests evenly over a plurality of servers. At least as for the users that are accessing that server, each of the plurality of servers has access to the MTS' data; however, other alternative configurations may be used instead.
- system 616 implements a web-based customer relationship management (CRM) system.
- system 616 includes application servers configured to implement and execute CRM software applications as well as provide related data, code, forms, webpages and other information to and from user systems 612 and to store to, and retrieve from, a database system related data, objects, and Webpage content.
- CRM customer relationship management
- data for multiple tenants may be stored in the same physical database object, however, tenant data typically is arranged so that data of one tenant is kept logically separate from that of other tenants so that one tenant does not have access to another tenant's data, unless such data is expressly shared.
- system 616 implements applications other than, or in addition to, a CRM application.
- system 616 may provide tenant access to multiple hosted (standard and custom) applications, including a CRM application.
- User (or third party developer) applications which may or may not include CRM, may be supported by the application platform 618 , which manages creation, storage of the applications into one or more database objects and executing of the applications in a virtual machine in the process space of the system 616 .
- FIG. 6 One arrangement for elements of system 616 is shown in FIG. 6 , including a network interface 620 , application platform 618 , tenant data storage 622 for tenant data 623 , system data storage 624 for system data 625 accessible to system 616 and possibly multiple tenants, program code 626 for implementing various functions of system 616 , and a process space 628 for executing MTS system processes and tenant-specific processes, such as running applications as part of an application hosting service. Additional processes that may execute on system 616 include database indexing processes.
- each user system 612 could include a desktop personal computer, workstation, laptop, PDA, cell phone, or any wireless access protocol (WAP) enabled device or any other computing device capable of interfacing directly or indirectly to the Internet or other network connection.
- WAP wireless access protocol
- User system 612 typically runs an HTTP client, e.g., a browsing program, such as Microsoft's Internet Explorer browser, Netscape's Navigator browser, Opera's browser, or a WAP-enabled browser in the case of a cell phone, PDA or other wireless device, or the like, allowing a user (e.g., subscriber of the multi-tenant database system) of user system 612 to access, process and view information, pages and applications available to it from system 616 over network 614 .
- User system 612 further includes Mobile OS (e.g., iOS® by Apple®, Android®, WebOS® by Palm®, etc.).
- Mobile OS e.g., iOS® by Apple®, Android®, WebOS® by Palm®, etc.
- Each user system 612 also typically includes one or more user interface devices, such as a keyboard, a mouse, trackball, touch pad, touch screen, pen or the like, for interacting with a graphical user interface (GUI) provided by the browser on a display (e.g., a monitor screen, LCD display, etc.) in conjunction with pages, forms, applications and other information provided by system 616 or other systems or servers.
- GUI graphical user interface
- the user interface device can be used to access data and applications hosted by system 616 , and to perform searches on stored data, and otherwise allow a user to interact with various GUI pages that may be presented to a user.
- embodiments are suitable for use with the Internet, which refers to a specific global internetwork of networks. However, it should be understood that other networks can be used instead of the Internet, such as an intranet, an extranet, a virtual private network (VPN), a non-TCP/IP based network, any LAN or WAN or the like.
- VPN virtual private network
- each user system 612 and all of its components are operator configurable using applications, such as a browser, including computer code run using a central processing unit such as an Intel Core® processor or the like.
- system 616 (and additional instances of an MTS, where more than one is present) and all of their components might be operator configurable using application(s) including computer code to run using a central processing unit such as processor system 617 , which may include an Intel Pentium® processor or the like, and/or multiple processor units.
- a computer program product embodiment includes a machine-readable storage medium (media) having instructions stored thereon/in which can be used to program a computer to perform any of the processes of the embodiments described herein.
- Computer code for operating and configuring system 616 to intercommunicate and to process webpages, applications and other data and media content as described herein are preferably downloaded and stored on a hard disk, but the entire program code, or portions thereof, may also be stored in any other volatile or non-volatile memory medium or device as is well known, such as a ROM or RAM, or provided on any media capable of storing program code, such as any type of rotating media including floppy disks, optical discs, digital versatile disk (DVD), compact disk (CD), microdrive, and magneto-optical disks, and magnetic or optical cards, nanosystems (including molecular memory ICs), or any type of media or device suitable for storing instructions and/or data.
- any type of rotating media including floppy disks, optical discs, digital versatile disk (DVD), compact disk (CD), microdrive, and magneto-optical disks, and magnetic or optical cards, nanosystems (including molecular memory ICs), or any type of media or device suitable for storing instructions and/or data.
- the entire program code, or portions thereof may be transmitted and downloaded from a software source over a transmission medium, e.g., over the Internet, or from another server, as is well known, or transmitted over any other conventional network connection as is well known (e.g., extranet, VPN, LAN, etc.) using any communication medium and protocols (e.g., TCP/IP, HTTP, HTTPS, Ethernet, etc.) as are well known.
- a transmission medium e.g., over the Internet
- any other conventional network connection e.g., extranet, VPN, LAN, etc.
- any communication medium and protocols e.g., TCP/IP, HTTP, HTTPS, Ethernet, etc.
- computer code for implementing embodiments can be implemented in any programming language that can be executed on a client system and/or server or server system such as, for example, C, C++, HTML, any other markup language, JavaTM JavaScript, ActiveX, any other scripting language, such as VBScript, and many other programming languages as are well known may be used.
- JavaTM is a trademark of Sun Microsystems, Inc.
- each system 616 is configured to provide webpages, forms, applications, data and media content to user (client) systems 612 to support the access by user systems 612 as tenants of system 616 .
- system 616 provides security mechanisms to keep each tenant's data separate unless the data is shared.
- MTS Mobility Management Entity
- they may be located in close proximity to one another (e.g., in a server farm located in a single building or campus), or they may be distributed at locations remote from one another (e.g., one or more servers located in city A and one or more servers located in city B).
- each MTS could include one or more logically and/or physically connected servers distributed locally or across one or more geographic locations.
- server is meant to include a computer system, including processing hardware and process space(s), and an associated storage system and database application (e.g., OODBMS or RDBMS) as is well known in the art. It should also be understood that “server system” and “server” are often used interchangeably herein.
- database object described herein can be implemented as single databases, a distributed database, a collection of distributed databases, a database with redundant online or offline backups or other redundancies, etc., and might include a distributed database or storage network and associated processing intelligence.
- FIG. 7 also illustrates environment 610 . However, in FIG. 7 elements of system 616 and various interconnections in an embodiment are further illustrated.
- user system 612 may include processor system 612 A, memory system 612 B, input system 612 C, and output system 612 D.
- FIG. 7 shows network 614 and system 616 .
- system 616 may include tenant data storage 622 , tenant data 623 , system data storage 624 , system data 625 , User Interface (UI) 730 , Application Program Interface (API) 732 , PL/SOQL 734 , save routines 736 , application setup mechanism 738 , applications servers 700 1 - 700 N , system process space 702 , tenant process spaces 704 , tenant management process space 710 , tenant storage area 712 , user storage 714 , and application metadata 716 .
- environment 610 may not have the same elements as those listed above and/or may have other elements instead of, or in addition to, those listed above.
- processor system 612 A may be any combination of one or more processors.
- Memory system 612 B may be any combination of one or more memory devices, short term, and/or long term memory.
- Input system 612 C may be any combination of input devices, such as one or more keyboards, mice, trackballs, scanners, cameras, and/or interfaces to networks.
- Output system 612 D may be any combination of output devices, such as one or more monitors, printers, and/or interfaces to networks.
- system 616 may include a network interface 620 (of FIG.
- Each application server 700 may be configured to tenant data storage 622 and the tenant data 623 therein, and system data storage 624 and the system data 625 therein to serve requests of user systems 612 .
- the tenant data 623 might be divided into individual tenant storage areas 712 , which can be either a physical arrangement and/or a logical arrangement of data.
- user storage 714 and application metadata 716 might be similarly allocated for each user.
- a copy of a user's most recently used (MRU) items might be stored to user storage 714 .
- a copy of MRU items for an entire organization that is a tenant might be stored to tenant storage area 712 .
- a UI 730 provides a user interface and an API 732 provides an application programmer interface to system 616 resident processes to users and/or developers at user systems 612 .
- the tenant data and the system data may be stored in various databases, such as one or more OracleTM databases.
- Application platform 618 includes an application setup mechanism 738 that supports application developers' creation and management of applications, which may be saved as metadata into tenant data storage 622 by save routines 736 for execution by subscribers as one or more tenant process spaces 704 managed by tenant management process 710 for example. Invocations to such applications may be coded using PL/SOQL 734 that provides a programming language style interface extension to API 732 . A detailed description of some PL/SOQL language embodiments is discussed in commonly owned U.S. Pat. No. 7,730,478 entitled, “Method and System for Allowing Access to Developed Applicants via a Multi-Tenant Database On-Demand Database Service”, issued Jun. 1, 2010 to Craig Weissman, which is incorporated in its entirety herein for all purposes. Invocations to applications may be detected by one or more system processes, which manage retrieving application metadata 716 for the subscriber making the invocation and executing the metadata as an application in a virtual machine.
- Each application server 700 may be communicably coupled to database systems, e.g., having access to system data 625 and tenant data 623 , via a different network connection.
- one application server 700 1 might be coupled via the network 614 (e.g., the Internet)
- another application server 700 N-1 might be coupled via a direct network link
- another application server 700 N might be coupled by yet a different network connection.
- Transfer Control Protocol and Internet Protocol TCP/IP
- TCP/IP Transfer Control Protocol and Internet Protocol
- each application server 700 is configured to handle requests for any user associated with any organization that is a tenant. Because it is desirable to be able to add and remove application servers from the server pool at any time for any reason, there is preferably no server affinity for a user and/or organization to a specific application server 700 .
- an interface system implementing a load balancing function e.g., an F5 Big-IP load balancer
- the load balancer uses a least connections algorithm to route user requests to the application servers 700 .
- Other examples of load balancing algorithms such as round robin and observed response time, also can be used.
- system 616 is multi-tenant, wherein system 616 handles storage of, and access to, different objects, data and applications across disparate users and organizations.
- one tenant might be a company that employs a sales force where each salesperson uses system 616 to manage their sales process.
- a user might maintain contact data, leads data, customer follow-up data, performance data, goals and progress data, etc., all applicable to that user's personal sales process (e.g., in tenant data storage 622 ).
- tenant data storage 622 e.g., in tenant data storage 622 .
- the user can manage his or her sales efforts and cycles from any of many different user systems. For example, if a salesperson is visiting a customer and the customer has Internet access in their lobby, the salesperson can obtain critical updates as to that customer while waiting for the customer to arrive in the lobby.
- user systems 612 (which may be client systems) communicate with application servers 700 to request and update system-level and tenant-level data from system 616 that may require sending one or more queries to tenant data storage 622 and/or system data storage 624 .
- System 616 e.g., an application server 700 in system 616
- System data storage 624 may generate query plans to access the requested data from the database.
- Each database can generally be viewed as a collection of objects, such as a set of logical tables, containing data fitted into predefined categories.
- a “table” is one representation of a data object, and may be used herein to simplify the conceptual description of objects and custom objects. It should be understood that “table” and “object” may be used interchangeably herein.
- Each table generally contains one or more data categories logically arranged as columns or fields in a viewable schema. Each row or record of a table contains an instance of data for each category defined by the fields.
- a CRM database may include a table that describes a customer with fields for basic contact information such as name, address, phone number, fax number, etc.
- Another table might describe a purchase order, including fields for information such as customer, product, sale price, date, etc.
- standard entity tables might be provided for use by all tenants.
- such standard entities might include tables for Account, Contact, Lead, and Opportunity data, each containing pre-defined fields. It should be understood that the word “entity” may also be used interchangeably herein with “object” and “table”.
- tenants may be allowed to create and store custom objects, or they may be allowed to customize standard entities or objects, for example by creating custom fields for standard objects, including custom index fields.
- all custom entity data rows are stored in a single multi-tenant physical table, which may contain multiple logical tables per organization. It is transparent to customers that their multiple “tables” are in fact stored in one large table or that their data may be stored in the same table as the data of other customers.
- Embodiments encompassed within this specification may also include embodiments that are only partially mentioned or alluded to or are not mentioned or alluded to at all in this brief summary or in the abstract. Although various embodiments may have been motivated by various deficiencies with the prior art, which may be discussed or alluded to in one or more places in the specification, the embodiments do not necessarily address any of these deficiencies. In other words, different embodiments may address different deficiencies that may be discussed in the specification. Some embodiments may only partially address some deficiencies or just one deficiency that may be discussed in the specification, and some embodiments may not address any of these deficiencies.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
- Hardware Redundancy (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims (51)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13/841,713 US9268605B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2013-03-15 | Mechanism for facilitating sliding window resource tracking in message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in an on-demand services environment |
PCT/US2013/045511 WO2014042730A1 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2013-06-12 | Facilitating sliding window resource tracking in message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in an on-demand services environment |
Applications Claiming Priority (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US201261700037P | 2012-09-12 | 2012-09-12 | |
US201261700032P | 2012-09-12 | 2012-09-12 | |
US201261708283P | 2012-10-01 | 2012-10-01 | |
US201261709263P | 2012-10-03 | 2012-10-03 | |
US201261711837P | 2012-10-10 | 2012-10-10 | |
US13/841,713 US9268605B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2013-03-15 | Mechanism for facilitating sliding window resource tracking in message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in an on-demand services environment |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20140075446A1 US20140075446A1 (en) | 2014-03-13 |
US9268605B2 true US9268605B2 (en) | 2016-02-23 |
Family
ID=50234309
Family Applications (6)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/841,417 Active 2034-01-26 US9529626B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2013-03-15 | Facilitating equitable distribution of thread resources for job types associated with tenants in a multi-tenant on-demand services environment |
US13/841,489 Active 2035-01-31 US10140153B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2013-03-15 | System, method, and medium for facilitating auction-based resource sharing for message queues in an on-demand services environment |
US13/841,588 Active 2034-05-14 US10768983B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2013-03-15 | Mechanism for facilitating a quorum-based coordination of broker health for management of resources for application servers in an on-demand services environment |
US13/841,649 Active 2034-02-27 US9348648B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2013-03-15 | Providing a routing framework for facilitating dynamic workload scheduling and routing of message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in an on-demand services environment |
US13/841,713 Active 2033-11-10 US9268605B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2013-03-15 | Mechanism for facilitating sliding window resource tracking in message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in an on-demand services environment |
US16/175,132 Abandoned US20190095249A1 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2018-10-30 | System, method, and medium for facilitating auction-based resource sharing for message queues in an on-demand services environment |
Family Applications Before (4)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/841,417 Active 2034-01-26 US9529626B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2013-03-15 | Facilitating equitable distribution of thread resources for job types associated with tenants in a multi-tenant on-demand services environment |
US13/841,489 Active 2035-01-31 US10140153B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2013-03-15 | System, method, and medium for facilitating auction-based resource sharing for message queues in an on-demand services environment |
US13/841,588 Active 2034-05-14 US10768983B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2013-03-15 | Mechanism for facilitating a quorum-based coordination of broker health for management of resources for application servers in an on-demand services environment |
US13/841,649 Active 2034-02-27 US9348648B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2013-03-15 | Providing a routing framework for facilitating dynamic workload scheduling and routing of message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in an on-demand services environment |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US16/175,132 Abandoned US20190095249A1 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2018-10-30 | System, method, and medium for facilitating auction-based resource sharing for message queues in an on-demand services environment |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (6) | US9529626B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2895954B1 (en) |
JP (2) | JP6423344B2 (en) |
CN (2) | CN109324900B (en) |
CA (1) | CA2883883C (en) |
WO (2) | WO2014042730A1 (en) |
Cited By (15)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20170123854A1 (en) * | 2014-02-19 | 2017-05-04 | Snowflake Computing Inc. | Resource provisioning systems and methods |
US10140153B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2018-11-27 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | System, method, and medium for facilitating auction-based resource sharing for message queues in an on-demand services environment |
US10169090B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2019-01-01 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Facilitating tiered service model-based fair allocation of resources for application servers in multi-tenant environments |
US10592317B2 (en) * | 2016-05-17 | 2020-03-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Timeout processing for messages |
US10613998B2 (en) * | 2018-07-30 | 2020-04-07 | EMC IP Holding Company LLC | Multi-level time decay storage queue |
US11093294B2 (en) | 2020-01-22 | 2021-08-17 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Load balancing through autonomous organization migration |
US11093485B2 (en) | 2019-08-27 | 2021-08-17 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Branch-based recovery in a database system |
US11308043B2 (en) | 2019-11-13 | 2022-04-19 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Distributed database replication |
US11336739B1 (en) | 2020-12-23 | 2022-05-17 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Intent-based allocation of database connections |
US11354153B2 (en) | 2020-01-22 | 2022-06-07 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Load balancing through autonomous organization migration |
US11368549B2 (en) | 2019-12-05 | 2022-06-21 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Platform for multi-stream sampling and visualization |
US11494408B2 (en) | 2019-09-24 | 2022-11-08 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Asynchronous row to object enrichment of database change streams |
US11748090B2 (en) | 2019-01-29 | 2023-09-05 | Salesforce, Inc. | Cloud services release orchestration |
US11816076B2 (en) | 2021-01-14 | 2023-11-14 | Salesforce, Inc. | Declarative data evacuation for distributed systems |
US20240121221A1 (en) * | 2022-10-06 | 2024-04-11 | Sap Se | Data sharing between tenants at different network platforms |
Families Citing this family (118)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9188644B1 (en) | 2012-09-25 | 2015-11-17 | The Boeing Company | Latency measurement system and method |
US9514664B2 (en) * | 2012-09-25 | 2016-12-06 | The Boeing Company | Measuring latency in a test system using captured images |
US9270621B1 (en) * | 2013-02-25 | 2016-02-23 | Ca, Inc. | Securely providing messages from the cloud |
US9772835B1 (en) * | 2013-03-13 | 2017-09-26 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Modification of program code for execution in a multi-tenant or distributed computing environment |
US9602426B2 (en) * | 2013-06-21 | 2017-03-21 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Dynamic allocation of resources while considering resource reservations |
US9678497B2 (en) * | 2013-08-30 | 2017-06-13 | Regents Of The University Of Minnesota | Parallel processing with cooperative multitasking |
US9262192B2 (en) * | 2013-12-16 | 2016-02-16 | Vmware, Inc. | Virtual machine data store queue allocation |
CN105900059B (en) | 2014-01-21 | 2019-06-07 | 甲骨文国际公司 | System and method for supporting multi-tenant in application server, cloud or other environment |
US9397905B1 (en) * | 2014-01-24 | 2016-07-19 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Aggregated health check of a multi-tenant service container |
US9813516B2 (en) | 2014-02-18 | 2017-11-07 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Transparent sharding of traffic across messaging brokers |
CN104901978A (en) * | 2014-03-04 | 2015-09-09 | 腾讯科技(北京)有限公司 | Network media information publication control method, device, and system |
US9660948B2 (en) * | 2014-06-23 | 2017-05-23 | Google Inc. | Rule-based rate limiting |
KR102375129B1 (en) * | 2014-06-23 | 2022-03-16 | 오라클 인터내셔날 코포레이션 | System and method for providing a work manager in a multitenant application server environment |
US10084783B2 (en) | 2014-06-23 | 2018-09-25 | Google Llc | Selectively restricting communications from third party applications/devices to electronic devices |
US10606652B2 (en) | 2014-07-28 | 2020-03-31 | Micro Focus Llc | Determining tenant priority based on resource utilization in separate time intervals and selecting requests from a particular tenant based on the priority |
US20160086270A1 (en) | 2014-09-24 | 2016-03-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic storage bandwidth allocation |
US10318280B2 (en) | 2014-09-24 | 2019-06-11 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for supporting patching in a multitenant application server environment |
EP3198431A1 (en) | 2014-09-24 | 2017-08-02 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for supporting patching in a multitenant application server environment |
US10148738B2 (en) * | 2014-11-12 | 2018-12-04 | Zuora, Inc. | System and method for equitable processing of asynchronous messages in a multi-tenant platform |
US9424077B2 (en) | 2014-11-14 | 2016-08-23 | Successfactors, Inc. | Throttle control on cloud-based computing tasks utilizing enqueue and dequeue counters |
CN105700949A (en) * | 2014-11-24 | 2016-06-22 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Data processing method and device based on multi-core processor |
WO2016089787A1 (en) * | 2014-12-01 | 2016-06-09 | Informatical Llc | Message broker system with parallel persistence |
US10250512B2 (en) | 2015-01-21 | 2019-04-02 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for traffic director support in a multitenant application server environment |
US20160217410A1 (en) * | 2015-01-23 | 2016-07-28 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Worker Task Assignment Based on Correlation and Capacity Information |
US10037432B2 (en) * | 2015-02-27 | 2018-07-31 | Lenovo (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. | Implementing file security settings based on context |
US10432551B1 (en) * | 2015-03-23 | 2019-10-01 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Network request throttling |
US9755922B2 (en) * | 2015-03-26 | 2017-09-05 | Ca, Inc. | Minimized installation of point of presence software agents by use of pre-installed browser |
US10410155B2 (en) | 2015-05-01 | 2019-09-10 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Automatic demand-driven resource scaling for relational database-as-a-service |
WO2017018928A1 (en) * | 2015-07-28 | 2017-02-02 | Razer (Asia-Pacific) Pte. Ltd. | Servers for a reward-generating distributed digital resource farm and methods for controlling a server for a reward-generating distributed digital resource farm |
US20170034011A1 (en) * | 2015-07-31 | 2017-02-02 | Comcast Cable Communications, Llc | Management Of Resources For Content Assets |
US10326702B2 (en) * | 2015-09-17 | 2019-06-18 | Facebook, Inc. | Data service levels |
CN106557366B (en) * | 2015-09-28 | 2020-09-08 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Task distribution method, device and system |
US20170104683A1 (en) * | 2015-10-08 | 2017-04-13 | Samsung Sds America, Inc. | Dynamically segmenting traffic for a/b testing in a distributed computing environment |
US11025706B2 (en) * | 2015-10-16 | 2021-06-01 | Atos Digital Health Solutions, Inc. | Load-balancing server for data transformation modules |
CN107231283B (en) * | 2016-03-23 | 2020-12-18 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Message management method and device and message pre-reading method and device |
US10003549B2 (en) * | 2016-04-21 | 2018-06-19 | Google Llc | System for allocating sensor network resources |
US10027596B1 (en) * | 2016-04-27 | 2018-07-17 | EMC IP Holding Company LLC | Hierarchical mapping of applications, services and resources for enhanced orchestration in converged infrastructure |
US10275325B2 (en) * | 2016-06-17 | 2019-04-30 | Weixu Technology Co., Ltd. | Method of site isolation protection, electronic device and system using the same method |
US10462070B1 (en) * | 2016-06-30 | 2019-10-29 | EMC IP Holding Company LLC | Service level based priority scheduler for multi-tenancy computing systems |
US10536391B1 (en) | 2016-07-07 | 2020-01-14 | Binaris Inc | Systems and methods for intelligently directing a service request to a preferred place of execution |
US10412158B2 (en) * | 2016-07-27 | 2019-09-10 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Dynamic allocation of stateful nodes for healing and load balancing |
US10481955B2 (en) | 2016-09-18 | 2019-11-19 | International Business Machines Corporation | Optimizing tail latency via workload and resource redundancy in cloud |
US10599479B2 (en) | 2016-09-21 | 2020-03-24 | International Business Machines Corporation | Resource sharing management of a field programmable device |
US10572310B2 (en) | 2016-09-21 | 2020-02-25 | International Business Machines Corporation | Deploying and utilizing a software library and corresponding field programmable device binary |
US10417012B2 (en) | 2016-09-21 | 2019-09-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Reprogramming a field programmable device on-demand |
US10355945B2 (en) | 2016-09-21 | 2019-07-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Service level management of a workload defined environment |
US10701176B1 (en) * | 2016-09-23 | 2020-06-30 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Messaging using a hash ring with host groups |
US11620163B2 (en) * | 2016-10-05 | 2023-04-04 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Controlling resource allocation in a data center by monitoring load on servers and network links |
CN106453557B (en) * | 2016-10-13 | 2019-04-09 | 内蒙古工业大学 | A Dual Time Scale User Dynamic Bidding and Resource Management Algorithm in IaaS Service |
CN106777309A (en) * | 2016-12-30 | 2017-05-31 | 中国民航信息网络股份有限公司 | Non-scheduled flight passenger notifies the processing method and system of data |
US10218813B2 (en) * | 2017-01-31 | 2019-02-26 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Automatic surge protection of system resources |
EP3358511A1 (en) * | 2017-02-01 | 2018-08-08 | Deutsche Telekom AG | Network resources brokering system and brokering entity |
KR20180090658A (en) * | 2017-02-03 | 2018-08-13 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method and apparatus for processing a security key in a handover using multiple connections in a mobile communication system |
US10424040B2 (en) | 2017-04-21 | 2019-09-24 | Intel Corporation | Dynamic allocation of cache based on instantaneous bandwidth consumption at computing devices |
US10425274B2 (en) | 2017-05-11 | 2019-09-24 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Techniques and architectures for recovering from a service disruption in a multi-server environment |
US10635561B2 (en) * | 2017-05-11 | 2020-04-28 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Techniques and architectures for managing database failure in a single-node database architecture |
US10567213B1 (en) | 2017-07-06 | 2020-02-18 | Binaris Inc | Systems and methods for selecting specific code segments in conjunction with executing requested tasks |
US10621001B1 (en) | 2017-07-06 | 2020-04-14 | Binaris Inc | Systems and methods for efficiently expediting execution of tasks in isolated environments |
US11100058B2 (en) * | 2017-09-06 | 2021-08-24 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for connection concentration in a database environment |
CN107633087A (en) * | 2017-09-29 | 2018-01-26 | 南威软件股份有限公司 | A kind of date storage method based on database |
US10817392B1 (en) | 2017-11-01 | 2020-10-27 | Pure Storage, Inc. | Ensuring resiliency to storage device failures in a storage system that includes a plurality of storage devices |
US10467107B1 (en) * | 2017-11-01 | 2019-11-05 | Pure Storage, Inc. | Maintaining metadata resiliency among storage device failures |
US10404565B2 (en) * | 2017-12-13 | 2019-09-03 | Ford Global Technologies, Llc | Simulation latency indication |
CN108881150B (en) * | 2017-12-29 | 2021-03-23 | 北京安天网络安全技术有限公司 | Detection task processing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
FR3076370B1 (en) * | 2017-12-30 | 2020-11-27 | Bull Sas | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR THE OPTIMIZATION OF THE SCHEDULING OF BATCH TREATMENTS |
US11681976B2 (en) * | 2018-01-29 | 2023-06-20 | Walmart Apollo, Llc | Automated exception event handler for resolving shipping exceptions |
CN110297707A (en) * | 2018-03-22 | 2019-10-01 | 香港乐蜜有限公司 | A kind of method for message transmission and device |
CN108459829B (en) * | 2018-04-12 | 2021-11-12 | 厦门集微科技有限公司 | Data storage method and device and computer storage medium |
US11061896B2 (en) * | 2018-06-19 | 2021-07-13 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Maximizing operator parallelism |
CN109600414B (en) * | 2018-08-13 | 2020-04-10 | 北京字节跳动网络技术有限公司 | Resource allocation method, device, equipment and storage medium |
CN110896531B (en) | 2018-09-13 | 2020-12-29 | 上海朗帛通信技术有限公司 | Method and apparatus in a node used for wireless communication |
CN111240811A (en) * | 2018-11-28 | 2020-06-05 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Cluster scheduling method, device and system and electronic equipment |
US11824765B2 (en) * | 2018-12-19 | 2023-11-21 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Fast redirect of traffic when pods fail |
US11188593B1 (en) * | 2018-12-28 | 2021-11-30 | Pivotal Software, Inc. | Reactive programming database interface |
US10768923B2 (en) | 2019-01-29 | 2020-09-08 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Release orchestration for performing pre release, version specific testing to validate application versions |
US10776099B2 (en) | 2019-01-29 | 2020-09-15 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Release orchestration for cloud services |
JP2020154391A (en) * | 2019-03-18 | 2020-09-24 | 富士ゼロックス株式会社 | Information processing system and program |
JP7031630B2 (en) * | 2019-03-20 | 2022-03-08 | オムロン株式会社 | Pipeline arithmetic unit, programmable logic controller, and how to execute pipeline processing |
US11392843B2 (en) * | 2019-04-01 | 2022-07-19 | Accenture Global Solutions Limited | Utilizing a machine learning model to predict a quantity of cloud resources to allocate to a customer |
WO2020219040A1 (en) * | 2019-04-24 | 2020-10-29 | Alibaba Group Holding Limited | Distributed resource allocation |
AU2019253789B1 (en) * | 2019-04-24 | 2020-10-08 | Advanced New Technologies Co., Ltd. | Distributed resource allocation |
WO2020219041A1 (en) * | 2019-04-24 | 2020-10-29 | Alibaba Group Holding Limited | Distributed resource allocation |
US11175958B2 (en) * | 2019-05-01 | 2021-11-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Determine a load balancing mechanism for allocation of shared resources in a storage system using a machine learning module based on number of I/O operations |
CN110134520A (en) * | 2019-05-27 | 2019-08-16 | 眸芯科技(上海)有限公司 | The application method and system of integrated circuit scarce resource based on queuing |
CN110362391B (en) * | 2019-06-12 | 2021-08-13 | 北京达佳互联信息技术有限公司 | Resource scheduling method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
US11063882B2 (en) * | 2019-08-07 | 2021-07-13 | International Business Machines Corporation | Resource allocation for data integration |
WO2021035517A1 (en) * | 2019-08-27 | 2021-03-04 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Workflow-based scheduling and batching in multi-tenant distributed systems |
CN112783613B (en) * | 2019-11-07 | 2024-03-01 | 北京沃东天骏信息技术有限公司 | Method and device for scheduling units |
CN112953982B (en) * | 2019-11-26 | 2022-08-30 | 腾讯科技(深圳)有限公司 | Service processing method, service configuration method and related device |
CN110941681B (en) * | 2019-12-11 | 2021-02-23 | 南方电网数字电网研究院有限公司 | Multi-tenant data processing system, method and device of power system |
CN111190738B (en) * | 2019-12-31 | 2023-09-08 | 北京仁科互动网络技术有限公司 | User mirroring method, device and system under multi-tenant system |
CN111210312B (en) * | 2020-01-08 | 2023-12-05 | 山东汇贸电子口岸有限公司 | Distributed online real-time bidding device and method applied to intermediary selection |
US11895201B2 (en) * | 2020-03-27 | 2024-02-06 | Intel Corporation | Programmable integrated circuit configured as a remote trust anchor to support multitenancy |
CN111405319B (en) * | 2020-03-31 | 2021-07-23 | 北京达佳互联信息技术有限公司 | Bandwidth determination method, apparatus, electronic device and storage medium |
US11126483B1 (en) | 2020-04-17 | 2021-09-21 | Oracle International Corporation | Direct message retrieval in distributed messaging systems |
US11030021B1 (en) * | 2020-07-16 | 2021-06-08 | Tracelink, Inc. | Variable selection of different versions of an event handler |
US11823021B2 (en) | 2020-07-31 | 2023-11-21 | Yahoo Assets Llc | System and method for ensemble expert diversification via bidding |
US20220036249A1 (en) * | 2020-07-31 | 2022-02-03 | Oath Inc. | System and Method for Ensemble Expert Diversification and Control Thereof |
US11915114B2 (en) | 2020-07-31 | 2024-02-27 | Yahoo Assets Llc | System and method for ensemble expert diversification |
US12141237B2 (en) | 2020-07-31 | 2024-11-12 | Yahoo Assets Llc | System and method for ensemble expert diversification via bidding and control thereof |
US20220058727A1 (en) * | 2020-08-18 | 2022-02-24 | Core Scientific, Inc. | Job based bidding |
US11397632B2 (en) * | 2020-10-30 | 2022-07-26 | Red Hat, Inc. | Safely recovering workloads within a finite timeframe from unhealthy cluster nodes |
US20220164221A1 (en) * | 2020-11-23 | 2022-05-26 | Motorola Solutions, Inc. | Preserving persistent link connections during a cloud-based service system upgrade |
JP7001847B1 (en) | 2021-01-06 | 2022-01-20 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Information processing system and bursting control method |
US20240303388A1 (en) | 2021-03-30 | 2024-09-12 | Johnson Controls Fire Protection LP | Systems and methods for simulating control panel state and control panel responses |
US11733767B2 (en) * | 2021-06-25 | 2023-08-22 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Power management for multiple-chiplet systems |
US11841871B2 (en) * | 2021-06-29 | 2023-12-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing extract, transform and load systems |
CN113504988A (en) * | 2021-07-07 | 2021-10-15 | 江苏云从曦和人工智能有限公司 | Control method, system, medium and device for system computing power resource scheduling |
US20230049160A1 (en) * | 2021-08-12 | 2023-02-16 | Salesforce, Inc. | Dynamically updating resource allocation tool |
US11855848B2 (en) | 2021-08-27 | 2023-12-26 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | Model-based service placement |
US11323339B1 (en) * | 2021-08-27 | 2022-05-03 | Juniper Networks, Inc. | Service placement assistance |
US12047440B2 (en) | 2021-10-05 | 2024-07-23 | International Business Machines Corporation | Managing workload in a service mesh |
CN114064237B (en) * | 2021-11-01 | 2024-07-19 | 北京微朗科技有限公司 | Multi-tenant management system and management method based on intelligent network card |
US20230141570A1 (en) * | 2021-11-08 | 2023-05-11 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Query admission control for online data systems based on response time objectives |
US12160412B2 (en) * | 2021-11-12 | 2024-12-03 | At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. | Apparatuses and methods to facilitate notifications in relation to data from multiple sources |
US11704043B1 (en) | 2022-01-31 | 2023-07-18 | Salesforce, Inc. | Backup and/or restore as a service |
CN115118508B (en) * | 2022-06-28 | 2023-09-19 | 平安银行股份有限公司 | Data management method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
CN117950888B (en) * | 2024-03-25 | 2024-10-29 | 民航成都电子技术有限责任公司 | Airport message management method, airport message management device, airport message management medium and computing equipment |
Citations (123)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5577188A (en) | 1994-05-31 | 1996-11-19 | Future Labs, Inc. | Method to provide for virtual screen overlay |
US5608872A (en) | 1993-03-19 | 1997-03-04 | Ncr Corporation | System for allowing all remote computers to perform annotation on an image and replicating the annotated image on the respective displays of other comuters |
US5649104A (en) | 1993-03-19 | 1997-07-15 | Ncr Corporation | System for allowing user of any computer to draw image over that generated by the host computer and replicating the drawn image to other computers |
US5715450A (en) | 1995-09-27 | 1998-02-03 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of selecting and presenting data from a database using a query language to a user of a computer system |
US5821937A (en) | 1996-02-23 | 1998-10-13 | Netsuite Development, L.P. | Computer method for updating a network design |
US5831610A (en) | 1996-02-23 | 1998-11-03 | Netsuite Development L.P. | Designing networks |
US5873096A (en) | 1997-10-08 | 1999-02-16 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of maintaining a network of partially replicated database system |
US5918159A (en) | 1997-08-04 | 1999-06-29 | Fomukong; Mundi | Location reporting satellite paging system with optional blocking of location reporting |
US5963953A (en) | 1998-03-30 | 1999-10-05 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method, and system for product configuration |
US6092083A (en) | 1997-02-26 | 2000-07-18 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Database management system which synchronizes an enterprise server and a workgroup user client using a docking agent |
US6169534B1 (en) | 1997-06-26 | 2001-01-02 | Upshot.Com | Graphical user interface for customer information management |
US6178425B1 (en) | 1997-02-26 | 2001-01-23 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of determining the visibility to a remote database client of a plurality of database transactions using simplified visibility rules |
US6216135B1 (en) | 1997-02-26 | 2001-04-10 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of determining visibility to a remote database client of a plurality of database transactions having variable visibility strengths |
US6233617B1 (en) | 1997-02-26 | 2001-05-15 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Determining the visibility to a remote database client |
US6266669B1 (en) | 1997-02-28 | 2001-07-24 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Partially replicated distributed database with multiple levels of remote clients |
US6295530B1 (en) | 1995-05-15 | 2001-09-25 | Andrew M. Ritchie | Internet service of differently formatted viewable data signals including commands for browser execution |
US20010044791A1 (en) | 2000-04-14 | 2001-11-22 | Richter James Neal | Automated adaptive classification system for bayesian knowledge networks |
US6324693B1 (en) | 1997-03-12 | 2001-11-27 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of synchronizing independently distributed software and database schema |
US6324568B1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2001-11-27 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method and system for distributing objects over a network |
US6336137B1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2002-01-01 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Web client-server system and method for incompatible page markup and presentation languages |
US20020022986A1 (en) | 1998-11-30 | 2002-02-21 | Coker John L. | Smart scripting call centers |
USD454139S1 (en) | 2001-02-20 | 2002-03-05 | Rightnow Technologies | Display screen for a computer |
US20020029376A1 (en) | 1998-11-30 | 2002-03-07 | Jesse Ambrose | Development tool, method, and system for client server applications |
US20020029161A1 (en) | 1998-11-30 | 2002-03-07 | Brodersen Robert A. | Assignment manager |
US6367077B1 (en) | 1997-02-27 | 2002-04-02 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of upgrading a software application in the presence of user modifications |
US20020042264A1 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2002-04-11 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Data communication method using mobile terminal |
US6393605B1 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 2002-05-21 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Apparatus and system for efficient delivery and deployment of an application |
US20020072951A1 (en) | 1999-03-03 | 2002-06-13 | Michael Lee | Marketing support database management method, system and program product |
US20020082892A1 (en) | 1998-08-27 | 2002-06-27 | Keith Raffel | Method and apparatus for network-based sales force management |
US6434550B1 (en) | 2000-04-14 | 2002-08-13 | Rightnow Technologies, Inc. | Temporal updates of relevancy rating of retrieved information in an information search system |
US6446089B1 (en) | 1997-02-26 | 2002-09-03 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of using a cache to determine the visibility to a remote database client of a plurality of database transactions |
US20020140731A1 (en) | 2001-03-28 | 2002-10-03 | Pavitra Subramaniam | Engine to present a user interface based on a logical structure, such as one for a customer relationship management system, across a web site |
US20020143997A1 (en) | 2001-03-28 | 2002-10-03 | Xiaofei Huang | Method and system for direct server synchronization with a computing device |
US20020152102A1 (en) | 1998-11-30 | 2002-10-17 | Brodersen Karen Cheung | State models for monitoring process |
US20020162090A1 (en) | 2001-04-30 | 2002-10-31 | Parnell Karen P. | Polylingual simultaneous shipping of software |
US20020161734A1 (en) | 1999-03-03 | 2002-10-31 | Christopher Stauber | Application instantiation based upon attributes and values stored in a meta data repository, including tiering of application layers objects and components |
US20020165742A1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2002-11-07 | Mark Robins | Feature centric release manager method and system |
US20030004971A1 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2003-01-02 | Gong Wen G. | Automatic generation of data models and accompanying user interfaces |
US20030018705A1 (en) | 2001-03-31 | 2003-01-23 | Mingte Chen | Media-independent communication server |
US20030018830A1 (en) | 2001-02-06 | 2003-01-23 | Mingte Chen | Adaptive communication application programming interface |
US20030033191A1 (en) | 2000-06-15 | 2003-02-13 | Xis Incorporated | Method and apparatus for a product lifecycle management process |
US6535909B1 (en) | 1999-11-18 | 2003-03-18 | Contigo Software, Inc. | System and method for record and playback of collaborative Web browsing session |
US20030066031A1 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-03 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method and system for supporting user navigation in a browser environment |
US20030066032A1 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-03 | Siebel Systems,Inc. | System and method for facilitating user interaction in a browser environment |
US20030069936A1 (en) | 2001-10-09 | 2003-04-10 | Warner Douglas K. | Method for routing electronic correspondence based on the level and type of emotion contained therein |
US20030070000A1 (en) | 2001-09-29 | 2003-04-10 | John Coker | Computing system and method to implicitly commit unsaved data for a World Wide Web application |
US20030070005A1 (en) | 2001-09-29 | 2003-04-10 | Anil Mukundan | Method, apparatus, and system for implementing view caching in a framework to support web-based applications |
US20030070004A1 (en) | 2001-09-29 | 2003-04-10 | Anil Mukundan | Method, apparatus, and system for implementing a framework to support a web-based application |
US20030074418A1 (en) | 2001-09-29 | 2003-04-17 | John Coker | Method, apparatus and system for a mobile web client |
US6560461B1 (en) | 1997-08-04 | 2003-05-06 | Mundi Fomukong | Authorized location reporting paging system |
US20030088545A1 (en) | 2001-06-18 | 2003-05-08 | Pavitra Subramaniam | System and method to implement a persistent and dismissible search center frame |
US6577726B1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2003-06-10 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Computer telephony integration hotelling method and system |
US6601087B1 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 2003-07-29 | Webex Communications, Inc. | Instant document sharing |
US6604117B2 (en) | 1996-03-19 | 2003-08-05 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of maintaining a network of partially replicated database system |
US20030151633A1 (en) | 2002-02-13 | 2003-08-14 | David George | Method and system for enabling connectivity to a data system |
US20030159136A1 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2003-08-21 | Huang Xiao Fei | Method and system for server synchronization with a computing device |
US6621834B1 (en) | 1999-11-05 | 2003-09-16 | Raindance Communications, Inc. | System and method for voice transmission over network protocols |
US20030191743A1 (en) | 1998-03-03 | 2003-10-09 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method, apparatus, system, and program product for attaching files and other objects to a partially replicated database |
US20030189600A1 (en) | 2002-03-29 | 2003-10-09 | Prasad Gune | Defining an approval process for requests for approval |
US20030204427A1 (en) | 2002-03-29 | 2003-10-30 | Prasad Gune | User interface for processing requests for approval |
US20030206192A1 (en) | 2001-03-31 | 2003-11-06 | Mingte Chen | Asynchronous message push to web browser |
US6654032B1 (en) | 1999-12-23 | 2003-11-25 | Webex Communications, Inc. | Instant sharing of documents on a remote server |
US20030225730A1 (en) | 2002-06-03 | 2003-12-04 | Rightnow Technologies, Inc. | System and method for generating a dynamic interface via a communications network |
US6665655B1 (en) | 2000-04-14 | 2003-12-16 | Rightnow Technologies, Inc. | Implicit rating of retrieved information in an information search system |
US20040001092A1 (en) | 2002-06-27 | 2004-01-01 | Rothwein Thomas M. | Prototyping graphical user interfaces |
US20040010489A1 (en) | 2002-07-12 | 2004-01-15 | Rightnow Technologies, Inc. | Method for providing search-specific web pages in a network computing environment |
US20040015981A1 (en) | 2002-06-27 | 2004-01-22 | Coker John L. | Efficient high-interactivity user interface for client-server applications |
US20040027388A1 (en) | 2002-06-27 | 2004-02-12 | Eric Berg | Method and apparatus to facilitate development of a customer-specific business process model |
US6711565B1 (en) | 2001-06-18 | 2004-03-23 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method, apparatus, and system for previewing search results |
US6724399B1 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2004-04-20 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for enabling keyboard accelerators in applications implemented via a browser |
US6728702B1 (en) | 2001-06-18 | 2004-04-27 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | System and method to implement an integrated search center supporting a full-text search and query on a database |
US6728960B1 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 2004-04-27 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Techniques for managing multiple threads in a browser environment |
US6732100B1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2004-05-04 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Database access method and system for user role defined access |
US6732095B1 (en) | 2001-04-13 | 2004-05-04 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for mapping between XML and relational representations |
US20040128001A1 (en) | 2002-08-28 | 2004-07-01 | Levin Issac Stephen | Method and apparatus for an integrated process modeller |
US6763351B1 (en) | 2001-06-18 | 2004-07-13 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method, apparatus, and system for attaching search results |
US6763501B1 (en) | 2000-06-09 | 2004-07-13 | Webex Communications, Inc. | Remote document serving |
US20040186860A1 (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2004-09-23 | Wen-Hsin Lee | Method and architecture for providing data-change alerts to external applications via a push service |
US20040193510A1 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2004-09-30 | Catahan Nardo B. | Modeling of order data |
US20040199489A1 (en) | 2003-03-24 | 2004-10-07 | Barnes-Leon Maria Theresa | Custom common object |
US20040199543A1 (en) | 2003-04-04 | 2004-10-07 | Braud Luke A. | Facilitating data manipulation in a browser-based user interface of an enterprise business application |
US20040199536A1 (en) | 2003-03-24 | 2004-10-07 | Barnes Leon Maria Theresa | Product common object |
US6804330B1 (en) | 2002-01-04 | 2004-10-12 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method and system for accessing CRM data via voice |
US6826582B1 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2004-11-30 | Emc Corporation | Method and system for using file systems for content management |
US6829655B1 (en) | 2001-03-28 | 2004-12-07 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method and system for server synchronization with a computing device via a companion device |
US20040249854A1 (en) | 2003-03-24 | 2004-12-09 | Barnes-Leon Maria Theresa | Common common object |
US20040260534A1 (en) | 2003-06-19 | 2004-12-23 | Pak Wai H. | Intelligent data search |
US20040260659A1 (en) | 2003-06-23 | 2004-12-23 | Len Chan | Function space reservation system |
US20040268299A1 (en) | 2003-06-30 | 2004-12-30 | Shu Lei | Application user interface template with free-form layout |
US6842748B1 (en) | 2000-04-14 | 2005-01-11 | Rightnow Technologies, Inc. | Usage based strength between related information in an information retrieval system |
EP1510917A1 (en) | 2003-08-27 | 2005-03-02 | France Telecom | Method of allocating a resource among a plurality of users in real time using an auction mechanism |
US20050050555A1 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2005-03-03 | Exley Richard Mark | Universal application network architecture |
US20050183084A1 (en) | 2004-02-13 | 2005-08-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Autonomic workload classification using predictive assertion for wait queue and thread pool selection |
US20050223022A1 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2005-10-06 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Custom entities and fields in a multi-tenant database system |
US20060122927A1 (en) | 2004-12-06 | 2006-06-08 | Bernardo Huberman | System and method for allocating resources in a distributed computational system using proportional share auctions |
US20070016663A1 (en) | 2005-07-14 | 2007-01-18 | Brian Weis | Approach for managing state information by a group of servers that services a group of clients |
US7289976B2 (en) | 2004-12-23 | 2007-10-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Easy-to-use data report specification |
US7340411B2 (en) | 1998-02-26 | 2008-03-04 | Cook Rachael L | System and method for generating, capturing, and managing customer lead information over a computer network |
US20080178187A1 (en) | 2007-01-22 | 2008-07-24 | Yaniv Altshuler | Method and computer program product for job selection and resource alolocation of a massively parallel processor |
US20090119080A1 (en) | 2004-08-27 | 2009-05-07 | Gray Leonard J | Computational simulation systems and methods using boundary integral equations |
US20090164635A1 (en) | 2007-08-07 | 2009-06-25 | Dennis Denker | Systems and methods for providing resource allocation in a networked environment |
US20090177356A1 (en) | 2008-01-08 | 2009-07-09 | Daniel Walter Plawecki | Methods and systems for vital bus architecture |
US20090177744A1 (en) | 2008-01-04 | 2009-07-09 | Yahoo! Inc. | Identifying and employing social network relationships |
US20090201935A1 (en) | 2008-02-08 | 2009-08-13 | Hass David T | System and method for parsing and allocating a plurality of packets to processor core threads |
US20090265205A1 (en) | 2008-03-11 | 2009-10-22 | Incentalign, Inc. | Pricing, Allocating, accounting and distributing internal resources using a market mechanism |
US7620655B2 (en) | 2003-05-07 | 2009-11-17 | Enecto Ab | Method, device and computer program product for identifying visitors of websites |
US7640339B1 (en) | 2005-02-14 | 2009-12-29 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for monitoring a node in a distributed system |
US20100049570A1 (en) | 2008-08-19 | 2010-02-25 | Xin Hui Li | Method and system for determining resource usage of each tenant in a multi-tenant architecture |
US20100103938A1 (en) | 2000-02-08 | 2010-04-29 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Context Sharing Between A Streaming Processing Unit (SPU) and A Packet Management Unit (PMU) In A Packet Processing Environment |
US7730478B2 (en) | 2006-10-04 | 2010-06-01 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Method and system for allowing access to developed applications via a multi-tenant on-demand database service |
US20100229218A1 (en) | 2009-03-05 | 2010-09-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Quota management for network services |
US20100235887A1 (en) | 2009-03-13 | 2010-09-16 | Novell, Inc. | System and method for queuing to a cloud via a queuing proxy |
US20110131645A1 (en) | 2009-11-30 | 2011-06-02 | Johnson Robert A | Load balancing and failover of gateway devices |
GB2475897A (en) | 2009-12-04 | 2011-06-08 | Creme Software Ltd | Resource allocation using estimated time to complete jobs in a grid or cloud computing environment |
US20110231457A1 (en) | 2010-03-16 | 2011-09-22 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Monitoring and managing job resources for database tasks |
US20110296515A1 (en) | 2010-05-28 | 2011-12-01 | Apple Inc. | Method for managing computer resources accessed by a program operating in a restricted environment |
US20120011518A1 (en) | 2010-07-08 | 2012-01-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Sharing with performance isolation between tenants in a software-as-a service system |
US20120311153A1 (en) * | 2011-05-31 | 2012-12-06 | Morgan Christopher Edwin | Systems and methods for detecting resource consumption events over sliding intervals in cloud-based network |
US20130024496A1 (en) | 2011-07-21 | 2013-01-24 | Yahoo! Inc | Method and system for building an elastic cloud web server farm |
US8504691B1 (en) | 2010-12-29 | 2013-08-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | System and method for allocating resources for heterogeneous service requests |
US20130262931A1 (en) | 2012-03-28 | 2013-10-03 | Software Ag | Systems and/or methods for testing client reactions to simulated disruptions |
US20140068620A1 (en) | 2012-08-30 | 2014-03-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Task execution & management in a clustered computing environment |
US20140075445A1 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2014-03-13 | salesforce.com,inc. | Mechanism for providing a routing framework for facilitating dynamic workload scheduling and routing of message queues for fair management of resources for application sercers in an on-demand services environment |
Family Cites Families (50)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH0816410B2 (en) | 1990-02-22 | 1996-02-21 | 株式会社大林組 | Air injection type snow removal device |
US5432926A (en) * | 1992-12-04 | 1995-07-11 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for improving database reliability and response time in a distributed transaction processing system |
JP3215264B2 (en) * | 1994-06-29 | 2001-10-02 | 科学技術庁航空宇宙技術研究所長 | Schedule control apparatus and method |
US5937205A (en) | 1995-12-06 | 1999-08-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Dynamic queue prioritization by modifying priority value based on queue's level and serving less than a maximum number of requests per queue |
US5909540A (en) | 1996-11-22 | 1999-06-01 | Mangosoft Corporation | System and method for providing highly available data storage using globally addressable memory |
US6263359B1 (en) | 1997-05-22 | 2001-07-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Computer resource proportional utilization and response time scheduling |
US8050198B2 (en) | 1999-05-24 | 2011-11-01 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and system for scheduling data transmission in communication systems |
EP1061710B1 (en) * | 1999-06-17 | 2010-12-08 | Level 3 Communications, LLC | System and method for integrated load distribution and resource management on internet environment |
US20010051890A1 (en) * | 2000-03-17 | 2001-12-13 | Raleigh Burgess | Systems and methods for providing remote support via productivity centers |
DE60144540D1 (en) * | 2000-07-31 | 2011-06-09 | Boeing Co | Device and computer readable medium for a broadcasting network |
JP2004050550A (en) | 2002-07-18 | 2004-02-19 | Fuji Xerox Co Ltd | Printer |
US7363346B2 (en) * | 2002-09-07 | 2008-04-22 | Appistry, Inc. | Reliably storing information across multiple computers such as in a hive of computers |
US7299229B2 (en) * | 2003-04-25 | 2007-11-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Grid quorum |
WO2004102896A2 (en) * | 2003-05-15 | 2004-11-25 | Telefonaktiebolaget Lm Ericsson (Publ) | Method for the distribution of a network traffic according to sla and qos parameters |
US7260589B2 (en) | 2003-12-04 | 2007-08-21 | International Business Machines Corporation | High performance support for XA protocols in a clustered shared database |
US7421402B2 (en) * | 2004-08-19 | 2008-09-02 | International Business Machines Corp. | Tier-based dynamic incentive arbitration in an on-demand computing environment |
US7706895B2 (en) | 2005-02-25 | 2010-04-27 | Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. | Reliable messaging instruction |
EP1866885A4 (en) | 2005-03-22 | 2011-12-21 | Ticketmaster | Apparatus and methods for providing queue messaging over a network |
US8527473B1 (en) * | 2005-10-20 | 2013-09-03 | Teradata Us, Inc. | Identifying database request sources in multi-database systems |
US8046441B2 (en) * | 2006-02-13 | 2011-10-25 | Infosys Limited | Business to business integration software as a service |
US20070254628A1 (en) | 2006-04-27 | 2007-11-01 | Research In Motion Limited | Method, apparatus and system for monitoring and controlling wireless resource usage |
US8087026B2 (en) | 2006-04-27 | 2011-12-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Fair share scheduling based on an individual user's resource usage and the tracking of that usage |
US8924269B2 (en) | 2006-05-13 | 2014-12-30 | Sap Ag | Consistent set of interfaces derived from a business object model |
US20080162707A1 (en) * | 2006-12-28 | 2008-07-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Time Based Permissioning |
JP2008204243A (en) | 2007-02-21 | 2008-09-04 | Hitachi Software Eng Co Ltd | Job execution control method and system |
US8458715B1 (en) * | 2007-02-23 | 2013-06-04 | Hrl Laboratories, Llc | System for allocating resources to optimize transition from a current state to a desired state |
US20080244607A1 (en) | 2007-03-27 | 2008-10-02 | Vladislav Rysin | Economic allocation and management of resources via a virtual resource market |
JP5104871B2 (en) | 2007-09-26 | 2012-12-19 | 富士通株式会社 | Resource allocation management program, resource allocation management device, and resource allocation management method |
US8082234B2 (en) * | 2007-11-19 | 2011-12-20 | Teradata Us, Inc. | Closed-loop system management method and process capable of managing workloads in a multi-system database environment |
US20090172149A1 (en) | 2007-12-28 | 2009-07-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Real-time information technology environments |
US20090287592A1 (en) | 2008-05-15 | 2009-11-19 | Worthybids Llc | System and method for conferring a benefit to a thrid party from the sale of leads |
US8392312B2 (en) | 2008-09-24 | 2013-03-05 | Netapp, Inc. | Adaptive scheduling of storage operations based on utilization of a multiple client and server resources in a distributed network storage system |
US8321558B1 (en) | 2009-03-31 | 2012-11-27 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Dynamically monitoring and modifying distributed execution of programs |
US20120016721A1 (en) * | 2010-07-15 | 2012-01-19 | Joseph Weinman | Price and Utility Optimization for Cloud Computing Resources |
US8612330B1 (en) * | 2010-09-14 | 2013-12-17 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Managing bandwidth for shared resources |
US9292466B1 (en) * | 2010-12-28 | 2016-03-22 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Traffic control for prioritized virtual machines |
US9342379B2 (en) | 2011-01-21 | 2016-05-17 | Wind River Systems, Inc. | Lock free acquisition and release of a semaphore in a multi-core processor environment |
CN102185708B (en) * | 2011-04-18 | 2014-06-18 | 武汉理工大学 | Grid resource distribution method based on Nash equilibrium |
US8910182B2 (en) * | 2011-05-27 | 2014-12-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Managing and simplifying distributed applications |
US8838526B2 (en) * | 2011-06-24 | 2014-09-16 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Systems and methods for supporting transactional message handling |
EP2551781A1 (en) * | 2011-07-29 | 2013-01-30 | British Telecommunications Public Limited Company | Data analysis system |
US20130060834A1 (en) | 2011-09-07 | 2013-03-07 | Microsoft Corportion | Distributed messaging system connectivity and resource management |
US9203900B2 (en) | 2011-09-23 | 2015-12-01 | Netapp, Inc. | Storage area network attached clustered storage system |
WO2013055313A1 (en) * | 2011-10-10 | 2013-04-18 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Methods and systems for planning execution of an application in a cloud computing system |
US8850022B2 (en) | 2011-10-26 | 2014-09-30 | Sag Ag | Adjustment of end user response times according to user expectations for server applications under load |
US8914663B2 (en) * | 2012-03-28 | 2014-12-16 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Rescheduling failed backup jobs |
US8949839B2 (en) * | 2012-07-26 | 2015-02-03 | Centurylink Intellectual Property Llc | Method and system for controlling work request queue in a multi-tenant cloud computing environment |
US9251103B2 (en) * | 2012-08-08 | 2016-02-02 | Vmware, Inc. | Memory-access-resource management |
US20150066587A1 (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2015-03-05 | Tealium Inc. | Content site visitor processing system |
DE102014107325B4 (en) * | 2014-05-23 | 2023-08-10 | Infineon Technologies Ag | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING A SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE |
-
2013
- 2013-03-15 US US13/841,417 patent/US9529626B2/en active Active
- 2013-03-15 US US13/841,489 patent/US10140153B2/en active Active
- 2013-03-15 US US13/841,588 patent/US10768983B2/en active Active
- 2013-03-15 US US13/841,649 patent/US9348648B2/en active Active
- 2013-03-15 US US13/841,713 patent/US9268605B2/en active Active
- 2013-06-12 JP JP2015531916A patent/JP6423344B2/en active Active
- 2013-06-12 CN CN201811091855.4A patent/CN109324900B/en active Active
- 2013-06-12 CA CA2883883A patent/CA2883883C/en active Active
- 2013-06-12 EP EP13731595.8A patent/EP2895954B1/en active Active
- 2013-06-12 CN CN201380047246.8A patent/CN104737132B/en active Active
- 2013-06-12 WO PCT/US2013/045511 patent/WO2014042730A1/en active Application Filing
- 2013-06-12 WO PCT/US2013/045509 patent/WO2014042729A1/en unknown
-
2018
- 2018-10-18 JP JP2018196455A patent/JP6672423B2/en active Active
- 2018-10-30 US US16/175,132 patent/US20190095249A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (149)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5819038A (en) | 1993-03-19 | 1998-10-06 | Ncr Corporation | Collaboration system for producing copies of image generated by first program on first computer on other computers and annotating the image by second program |
US5608872A (en) | 1993-03-19 | 1997-03-04 | Ncr Corporation | System for allowing all remote computers to perform annotation on an image and replicating the annotated image on the respective displays of other comuters |
US5649104A (en) | 1993-03-19 | 1997-07-15 | Ncr Corporation | System for allowing user of any computer to draw image over that generated by the host computer and replicating the drawn image to other computers |
US5761419A (en) | 1993-03-19 | 1998-06-02 | Ncr Corporation | Remote collaboration system including first program means translating user inputs into annotations and running on all computers while second program means runs on one computer |
US5577188A (en) | 1994-05-31 | 1996-11-19 | Future Labs, Inc. | Method to provide for virtual screen overlay |
US6826565B2 (en) | 1995-05-15 | 2004-11-30 | Ablaise Limited | Method and apparatus for serving files to browsing clients |
US6295530B1 (en) | 1995-05-15 | 2001-09-25 | Andrew M. Ritchie | Internet service of differently formatted viewable data signals including commands for browser execution |
US5715450A (en) | 1995-09-27 | 1998-02-03 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of selecting and presenting data from a database using a query language to a user of a computer system |
US5831610A (en) | 1996-02-23 | 1998-11-03 | Netsuite Development L.P. | Designing networks |
US5821937A (en) | 1996-02-23 | 1998-10-13 | Netsuite Development, L.P. | Computer method for updating a network design |
US6189011B1 (en) | 1996-03-19 | 2001-02-13 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of maintaining a network of partially replicated database system |
US6604117B2 (en) | 1996-03-19 | 2003-08-05 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of maintaining a network of partially replicated database system |
US6216135B1 (en) | 1997-02-26 | 2001-04-10 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of determining visibility to a remote database client of a plurality of database transactions having variable visibility strengths |
US6178425B1 (en) | 1997-02-26 | 2001-01-23 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of determining the visibility to a remote database client of a plurality of database transactions using simplified visibility rules |
US6092083A (en) | 1997-02-26 | 2000-07-18 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Database management system which synchronizes an enterprise server and a workgroup user client using a docking agent |
US6233617B1 (en) | 1997-02-26 | 2001-05-15 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Determining the visibility to a remote database client |
US6684438B2 (en) | 1997-02-26 | 2004-02-03 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of using cache to determine the visibility to a remote database client of a plurality of database transactions |
US6446089B1 (en) | 1997-02-26 | 2002-09-03 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of using a cache to determine the visibility to a remote database client of a plurality of database transactions |
US6367077B1 (en) | 1997-02-27 | 2002-04-02 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of upgrading a software application in the presence of user modifications |
US20020129352A1 (en) | 1997-02-27 | 2002-09-12 | Brodersen Robert A. | Method and apparatus for upgrading a software application in the presence of user modifications |
US20020035577A1 (en) | 1997-02-28 | 2002-03-21 | Brodersen Robert A. | Partially replicated distributed database with multiple levels of remote clients |
US6754681B2 (en) | 1997-02-28 | 2004-06-22 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Partially replicated distributed database with multiple levels of remote clients |
US6405220B1 (en) | 1997-02-28 | 2002-06-11 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Partially replicated distributed database with multiple levels of remote clients |
US6266669B1 (en) | 1997-02-28 | 2001-07-24 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Partially replicated distributed database with multiple levels of remote clients |
US6324693B1 (en) | 1997-03-12 | 2001-11-27 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of synchronizing independently distributed software and database schema |
US6169534B1 (en) | 1997-06-26 | 2001-01-02 | Upshot.Com | Graphical user interface for customer information management |
US5918159A (en) | 1997-08-04 | 1999-06-29 | Fomukong; Mundi | Location reporting satellite paging system with optional blocking of location reporting |
US6560461B1 (en) | 1997-08-04 | 2003-05-06 | Mundi Fomukong | Authorized location reporting paging system |
US5873096A (en) | 1997-10-08 | 1999-02-16 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method of maintaining a network of partially replicated database system |
US7340411B2 (en) | 1998-02-26 | 2008-03-04 | Cook Rachael L | System and method for generating, capturing, and managing customer lead information over a computer network |
US6732111B2 (en) | 1998-03-03 | 2004-05-04 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method, apparatus, system, and program product for attaching files and other objects to a partially replicated database |
US20030191743A1 (en) | 1998-03-03 | 2003-10-09 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method, apparatus, system, and program product for attaching files and other objects to a partially replicated database |
US5963953A (en) | 1998-03-30 | 1999-10-05 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method, and system for product configuration |
US20020082892A1 (en) | 1998-08-27 | 2002-06-27 | Keith Raffel | Method and apparatus for network-based sales force management |
US6393605B1 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 2002-05-21 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Apparatus and system for efficient delivery and deployment of an application |
US6728960B1 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 2004-04-27 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Techniques for managing multiple threads in a browser environment |
US6549908B1 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 2003-04-15 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for interpreting user selections in the context of a relation distributed as a set of orthogonalized sub-relations |
US6601087B1 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 2003-07-29 | Webex Communications, Inc. | Instant document sharing |
US6553563B2 (en) | 1998-11-30 | 2003-04-22 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Development tool, method, and system for client server applications |
US6850895B2 (en) | 1998-11-30 | 2005-02-01 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Assignment manager |
US20020152102A1 (en) | 1998-11-30 | 2002-10-17 | Brodersen Karen Cheung | State models for monitoring process |
US20020022986A1 (en) | 1998-11-30 | 2002-02-21 | Coker John L. | Smart scripting call centers |
US6826745B2 (en) | 1998-11-30 | 2004-11-30 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | System and method for smart scripting call centers and configuration thereof |
US6665648B2 (en) | 1998-11-30 | 2003-12-16 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | State models for monitoring process |
US20020029376A1 (en) | 1998-11-30 | 2002-03-07 | Jesse Ambrose | Development tool, method, and system for client server applications |
US20050091098A1 (en) | 1998-11-30 | 2005-04-28 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Assignment manager |
US20020029161A1 (en) | 1998-11-30 | 2002-03-07 | Brodersen Robert A. | Assignment manager |
US20020161734A1 (en) | 1999-03-03 | 2002-10-31 | Christopher Stauber | Application instantiation based upon attributes and values stored in a meta data repository, including tiering of application layers objects and components |
US6574635B2 (en) | 1999-03-03 | 2003-06-03 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Application instantiation based upon attributes and values stored in a meta data repository, including tiering of application layers objects and components |
US20030120675A1 (en) | 1999-03-03 | 2003-06-26 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Application instantiation based upon attributes and values stored in a meta data repository, including tiering of application layers, objects, and components |
US20020072951A1 (en) | 1999-03-03 | 2002-06-13 | Michael Lee | Marketing support database management method, system and program product |
US6621834B1 (en) | 1999-11-05 | 2003-09-16 | Raindance Communications, Inc. | System and method for voice transmission over network protocols |
US6535909B1 (en) | 1999-11-18 | 2003-03-18 | Contigo Software, Inc. | System and method for record and playback of collaborative Web browsing session |
US20020042843A1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2002-04-11 | Thanh Diec | Method and system for distributing objects over a network |
US6324568B1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2001-11-27 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method and system for distributing objects over a network |
US20030187921A1 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2003-10-02 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method and system for distributing objects over a network |
US6604128B2 (en) | 1999-11-30 | 2003-08-05 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method and system for distributing objects over a network |
US6654032B1 (en) | 1999-12-23 | 2003-11-25 | Webex Communications, Inc. | Instant sharing of documents on a remote server |
US20100103938A1 (en) | 2000-02-08 | 2010-04-29 | Mips Technologies, Inc. | Context Sharing Between A Streaming Processing Unit (SPU) and A Packet Management Unit (PMU) In A Packet Processing Environment |
US6609150B2 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2003-08-19 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Web client-server system and method for incompatible page markup and presentation languages |
US6336137B1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2002-01-01 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Web client-server system and method for incompatible page markup and presentation languages |
US6577726B1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2003-06-10 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Computer telephony integration hotelling method and system |
US20020165742A1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2002-11-07 | Mark Robins | Feature centric release manager method and system |
US6732100B1 (en) | 2000-03-31 | 2004-05-04 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Database access method and system for user role defined access |
US6434550B1 (en) | 2000-04-14 | 2002-08-13 | Rightnow Technologies, Inc. | Temporal updates of relevancy rating of retrieved information in an information search system |
US6842748B1 (en) | 2000-04-14 | 2005-01-11 | Rightnow Technologies, Inc. | Usage based strength between related information in an information retrieval system |
US20010044791A1 (en) | 2000-04-14 | 2001-11-22 | Richter James Neal | Automated adaptive classification system for bayesian knowledge networks |
US6665655B1 (en) | 2000-04-14 | 2003-12-16 | Rightnow Technologies, Inc. | Implicit rating of retrieved information in an information search system |
US6763501B1 (en) | 2000-06-09 | 2004-07-13 | Webex Communications, Inc. | Remote document serving |
US20030033191A1 (en) | 2000-06-15 | 2003-02-13 | Xis Incorporated | Method and apparatus for a product lifecycle management process |
US20020042264A1 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2002-04-11 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Data communication method using mobile terminal |
US6768904B2 (en) | 2000-10-11 | 2004-07-27 | Lg Electronics Inc. | Data communication method using mobile terminal |
US20030018830A1 (en) | 2001-02-06 | 2003-01-23 | Mingte Chen | Adaptive communication application programming interface |
USD454139S1 (en) | 2001-02-20 | 2002-03-05 | Rightnow Technologies | Display screen for a computer |
US20020140731A1 (en) | 2001-03-28 | 2002-10-03 | Pavitra Subramaniam | Engine to present a user interface based on a logical structure, such as one for a customer relationship management system, across a web site |
US20020143997A1 (en) | 2001-03-28 | 2002-10-03 | Xiaofei Huang | Method and system for direct server synchronization with a computing device |
US6829655B1 (en) | 2001-03-28 | 2004-12-07 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method and system for server synchronization with a computing device via a companion device |
US20030206192A1 (en) | 2001-03-31 | 2003-11-06 | Mingte Chen | Asynchronous message push to web browser |
US20030018705A1 (en) | 2001-03-31 | 2003-01-23 | Mingte Chen | Media-independent communication server |
US6732095B1 (en) | 2001-04-13 | 2004-05-04 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for mapping between XML and relational representations |
US20020162090A1 (en) | 2001-04-30 | 2002-10-31 | Parnell Karen P. | Polylingual simultaneous shipping of software |
US6711565B1 (en) | 2001-06-18 | 2004-03-23 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method, apparatus, and system for previewing search results |
US6763351B1 (en) | 2001-06-18 | 2004-07-13 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method, apparatus, and system for attaching search results |
US6728702B1 (en) | 2001-06-18 | 2004-04-27 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | System and method to implement an integrated search center supporting a full-text search and query on a database |
US6782383B2 (en) | 2001-06-18 | 2004-08-24 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | System and method to implement a persistent and dismissible search center frame |
US20030088545A1 (en) | 2001-06-18 | 2003-05-08 | Pavitra Subramaniam | System and method to implement a persistent and dismissible search center frame |
US20030004971A1 (en) | 2001-06-29 | 2003-01-02 | Gong Wen G. | Automatic generation of data models and accompanying user interfaces |
US20030066031A1 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-03 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method and system for supporting user navigation in a browser environment |
US20030066032A1 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2003-04-03 | Siebel Systems,Inc. | System and method for facilitating user interaction in a browser environment |
US6724399B1 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2004-04-20 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for enabling keyboard accelerators in applications implemented via a browser |
US6826582B1 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2004-11-30 | Emc Corporation | Method and system for using file systems for content management |
US20030159136A1 (en) | 2001-09-28 | 2003-08-21 | Huang Xiao Fei | Method and system for server synchronization with a computing device |
US20030074418A1 (en) | 2001-09-29 | 2003-04-17 | John Coker | Method, apparatus and system for a mobile web client |
US20030070004A1 (en) | 2001-09-29 | 2003-04-10 | Anil Mukundan | Method, apparatus, and system for implementing a framework to support a web-based application |
US20030070000A1 (en) | 2001-09-29 | 2003-04-10 | John Coker | Computing system and method to implicitly commit unsaved data for a World Wide Web application |
US20030070005A1 (en) | 2001-09-29 | 2003-04-10 | Anil Mukundan | Method, apparatus, and system for implementing view caching in a framework to support web-based applications |
US20030069936A1 (en) | 2001-10-09 | 2003-04-10 | Warner Douglas K. | Method for routing electronic correspondence based on the level and type of emotion contained therein |
US6804330B1 (en) | 2002-01-04 | 2004-10-12 | Siebel Systems, Inc. | Method and system for accessing CRM data via voice |
US20030151633A1 (en) | 2002-02-13 | 2003-08-14 | David George | Method and system for enabling connectivity to a data system |
US20030189600A1 (en) | 2002-03-29 | 2003-10-09 | Prasad Gune | Defining an approval process for requests for approval |
US20030204427A1 (en) | 2002-03-29 | 2003-10-30 | Prasad Gune | User interface for processing requests for approval |
US6850949B2 (en) | 2002-06-03 | 2005-02-01 | Right Now Technologies, Inc. | System and method for generating a dynamic interface via a communications network |
US20030225730A1 (en) | 2002-06-03 | 2003-12-04 | Rightnow Technologies, Inc. | System and method for generating a dynamic interface via a communications network |
US20040015981A1 (en) | 2002-06-27 | 2004-01-22 | Coker John L. | Efficient high-interactivity user interface for client-server applications |
US20040001092A1 (en) | 2002-06-27 | 2004-01-01 | Rothwein Thomas M. | Prototyping graphical user interfaces |
US20040027388A1 (en) | 2002-06-27 | 2004-02-12 | Eric Berg | Method and apparatus to facilitate development of a customer-specific business process model |
US20040010489A1 (en) | 2002-07-12 | 2004-01-15 | Rightnow Technologies, Inc. | Method for providing search-specific web pages in a network computing environment |
US20040128001A1 (en) | 2002-08-28 | 2004-07-01 | Levin Issac Stephen | Method and apparatus for an integrated process modeller |
US20040186860A1 (en) | 2003-03-21 | 2004-09-23 | Wen-Hsin Lee | Method and architecture for providing data-change alerts to external applications via a push service |
US20040249854A1 (en) | 2003-03-24 | 2004-12-09 | Barnes-Leon Maria Theresa | Common common object |
US20040199536A1 (en) | 2003-03-24 | 2004-10-07 | Barnes Leon Maria Theresa | Product common object |
US20040199489A1 (en) | 2003-03-24 | 2004-10-07 | Barnes-Leon Maria Theresa | Custom common object |
US20040193510A1 (en) | 2003-03-25 | 2004-09-30 | Catahan Nardo B. | Modeling of order data |
US20040199543A1 (en) | 2003-04-04 | 2004-10-07 | Braud Luke A. | Facilitating data manipulation in a browser-based user interface of an enterprise business application |
US7620655B2 (en) | 2003-05-07 | 2009-11-17 | Enecto Ab | Method, device and computer program product for identifying visitors of websites |
US20040260534A1 (en) | 2003-06-19 | 2004-12-23 | Pak Wai H. | Intelligent data search |
US20040260659A1 (en) | 2003-06-23 | 2004-12-23 | Len Chan | Function space reservation system |
US20040268299A1 (en) | 2003-06-30 | 2004-12-30 | Shu Lei | Application user interface template with free-form layout |
EP1510917A1 (en) | 2003-08-27 | 2005-03-02 | France Telecom | Method of allocating a resource among a plurality of users in real time using an auction mechanism |
US20050050555A1 (en) | 2003-08-28 | 2005-03-03 | Exley Richard Mark | Universal application network architecture |
US20050183084A1 (en) | 2004-02-13 | 2005-08-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Autonomic workload classification using predictive assertion for wait queue and thread pool selection |
US20050223022A1 (en) | 2004-04-02 | 2005-10-06 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Custom entities and fields in a multi-tenant database system |
US20090119080A1 (en) | 2004-08-27 | 2009-05-07 | Gray Leonard J | Computational simulation systems and methods using boundary integral equations |
US20060122927A1 (en) | 2004-12-06 | 2006-06-08 | Bernardo Huberman | System and method for allocating resources in a distributed computational system using proportional share auctions |
US7289976B2 (en) | 2004-12-23 | 2007-10-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Easy-to-use data report specification |
US7640339B1 (en) | 2005-02-14 | 2009-12-29 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Method and apparatus for monitoring a node in a distributed system |
US20070016663A1 (en) | 2005-07-14 | 2007-01-18 | Brian Weis | Approach for managing state information by a group of servers that services a group of clients |
US7730478B2 (en) | 2006-10-04 | 2010-06-01 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Method and system for allowing access to developed applications via a multi-tenant on-demand database service |
US20080178187A1 (en) | 2007-01-22 | 2008-07-24 | Yaniv Altshuler | Method and computer program product for job selection and resource alolocation of a massively parallel processor |
US20090164635A1 (en) | 2007-08-07 | 2009-06-25 | Dennis Denker | Systems and methods for providing resource allocation in a networked environment |
US20090177744A1 (en) | 2008-01-04 | 2009-07-09 | Yahoo! Inc. | Identifying and employing social network relationships |
US20090177356A1 (en) | 2008-01-08 | 2009-07-09 | Daniel Walter Plawecki | Methods and systems for vital bus architecture |
US20090201935A1 (en) | 2008-02-08 | 2009-08-13 | Hass David T | System and method for parsing and allocating a plurality of packets to processor core threads |
US20090265205A1 (en) | 2008-03-11 | 2009-10-22 | Incentalign, Inc. | Pricing, Allocating, accounting and distributing internal resources using a market mechanism |
US20100049570A1 (en) | 2008-08-19 | 2010-02-25 | Xin Hui Li | Method and system for determining resource usage of each tenant in a multi-tenant architecture |
US20100229218A1 (en) | 2009-03-05 | 2010-09-09 | Microsoft Corporation | Quota management for network services |
US20100235887A1 (en) | 2009-03-13 | 2010-09-16 | Novell, Inc. | System and method for queuing to a cloud via a queuing proxy |
US20110131645A1 (en) | 2009-11-30 | 2011-06-02 | Johnson Robert A | Load balancing and failover of gateway devices |
GB2475897A (en) | 2009-12-04 | 2011-06-08 | Creme Software Ltd | Resource allocation using estimated time to complete jobs in a grid or cloud computing environment |
US20110231457A1 (en) | 2010-03-16 | 2011-09-22 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Monitoring and managing job resources for database tasks |
US20110296515A1 (en) | 2010-05-28 | 2011-12-01 | Apple Inc. | Method for managing computer resources accessed by a program operating in a restricted environment |
US20120011518A1 (en) | 2010-07-08 | 2012-01-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Sharing with performance isolation between tenants in a software-as-a service system |
US8504691B1 (en) | 2010-12-29 | 2013-08-06 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | System and method for allocating resources for heterogeneous service requests |
US20120311153A1 (en) * | 2011-05-31 | 2012-12-06 | Morgan Christopher Edwin | Systems and methods for detecting resource consumption events over sliding intervals in cloud-based network |
US20130024496A1 (en) | 2011-07-21 | 2013-01-24 | Yahoo! Inc | Method and system for building an elastic cloud web server farm |
US20130262931A1 (en) | 2012-03-28 | 2013-10-03 | Software Ag | Systems and/or methods for testing client reactions to simulated disruptions |
US20140068620A1 (en) | 2012-08-30 | 2014-03-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Task execution & management in a clustered computing environment |
US20140075445A1 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2014-03-13 | salesforce.com,inc. | Mechanism for providing a routing framework for facilitating dynamic workload scheduling and routing of message queues for fair management of resources for application sercers in an on-demand services environment |
US20140075017A1 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2014-03-13 | salesforce.com,inc. | Mechanism for facilitating a quorum-based coordination of booker health for management of resources for application servers in an on-demand services enviroment |
Non-Patent Citations (6)
Title |
---|
Lee, Juong-Sik, Recurrent auctions in e-commerce, Rensslaer Polytechnic Institute, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing 2007, 3299458, 2 pages, downloaded from ProQuestDirect on the Internet on Sep. 21, 2015. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US2013/045509 Mailed Mar. 17, 2015, 5 pgs. |
PCT/US2013/045509, Notification of Transmittal of the International Searching Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, Mailed Oct. 9, 2013. |
PCT/US2013/045511, Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, Mailed Date Oct. 9, 2013, 8 Pgs. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/841489, Non-Final Office Action, Mailed Sep. 30, 2015. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/841588, Non-Final Office Action, Mailed Sep. 23, 2015. |
Cited By (24)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US10768983B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2020-09-08 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Mechanism for facilitating a quorum-based coordination of broker health for management of resources for application servers in an on-demand services environment |
US10140153B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2018-11-27 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | System, method, and medium for facilitating auction-based resource sharing for message queues in an on-demand services environment |
US10169090B2 (en) | 2012-09-12 | 2019-01-01 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Facilitating tiered service model-based fair allocation of resources for application servers in multi-tenant environments |
US11687563B2 (en) | 2014-02-19 | 2023-06-27 | Snowflake Inc. | Scaling capacity of data warehouses to user-defined levels |
US12045257B2 (en) | 2014-02-19 | 2024-07-23 | Snowflake Inc. | Adjusting processing times in data warehouses to user-defined levels |
US11429638B2 (en) | 2014-02-19 | 2022-08-30 | Snowflake Inc. | Systems and methods for scaling data warehouses |
US10534794B2 (en) * | 2014-02-19 | 2020-01-14 | Snowflake Inc. | Resource provisioning systems and methods |
US10776388B2 (en) | 2014-02-19 | 2020-09-15 | Snowflake Inc. | Resource provisioning systems and methods |
US10949446B2 (en) | 2014-02-19 | 2021-03-16 | Snowflake Inc. | Resource provisioning systems and methods |
US20170123854A1 (en) * | 2014-02-19 | 2017-05-04 | Snowflake Computing Inc. | Resource provisioning systems and methods |
US11163794B2 (en) | 2014-02-19 | 2021-11-02 | Snowflake Inc. | Resource provisioning systems and methods |
US10592317B2 (en) * | 2016-05-17 | 2020-03-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Timeout processing for messages |
US10613998B2 (en) * | 2018-07-30 | 2020-04-07 | EMC IP Holding Company LLC | Multi-level time decay storage queue |
US11748090B2 (en) | 2019-01-29 | 2023-09-05 | Salesforce, Inc. | Cloud services release orchestration |
US11093485B2 (en) | 2019-08-27 | 2021-08-17 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Branch-based recovery in a database system |
US11494408B2 (en) | 2019-09-24 | 2022-11-08 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Asynchronous row to object enrichment of database change streams |
US11308043B2 (en) | 2019-11-13 | 2022-04-19 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Distributed database replication |
US11368549B2 (en) | 2019-12-05 | 2022-06-21 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Platform for multi-stream sampling and visualization |
US11093294B2 (en) | 2020-01-22 | 2021-08-17 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Load balancing through autonomous organization migration |
US11354153B2 (en) | 2020-01-22 | 2022-06-07 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Load balancing through autonomous organization migration |
US11336739B1 (en) | 2020-12-23 | 2022-05-17 | Salesforce.Com, Inc. | Intent-based allocation of database connections |
US11816076B2 (en) | 2021-01-14 | 2023-11-14 | Salesforce, Inc. | Declarative data evacuation for distributed systems |
US20240121221A1 (en) * | 2022-10-06 | 2024-04-11 | Sap Se | Data sharing between tenants at different network platforms |
US12149508B2 (en) * | 2022-10-06 | 2024-11-19 | Sap Se | Data sharing between tenants at different network platforms |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20140075445A1 (en) | 2014-03-13 |
US9348648B2 (en) | 2016-05-24 |
WO2014042730A1 (en) | 2014-03-20 |
JP6423344B2 (en) | 2018-11-14 |
JP6672423B2 (en) | 2020-03-25 |
CA2883883A1 (en) | 2014-03-20 |
US20140075446A1 (en) | 2014-03-13 |
US20140075017A1 (en) | 2014-03-13 |
JP2019040613A (en) | 2019-03-14 |
CN109324900A (en) | 2019-02-12 |
US20140074641A1 (en) | 2014-03-13 |
CN104737132B (en) | 2018-10-30 |
US9529626B2 (en) | 2016-12-27 |
CA2883883C (en) | 2019-09-24 |
JP2015535975A (en) | 2015-12-17 |
EP2895954B1 (en) | 2023-11-29 |
US10768983B2 (en) | 2020-09-08 |
CN104737132A (en) | 2015-06-24 |
US20190095249A1 (en) | 2019-03-28 |
US10140153B2 (en) | 2018-11-27 |
CN109324900B (en) | 2022-03-04 |
WO2014042729A1 (en) | 2014-03-20 |
EP2895954A1 (en) | 2015-07-22 |
US20140075030A1 (en) | 2014-03-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US9268605B2 (en) | Mechanism for facilitating sliding window resource tracking in message queues for fair management of resources for application servers in an on-demand services environment | |
US11082357B2 (en) | Facilitating dynamic hierarchical management of queue resources in an on-demand services environment | |
US10169090B2 (en) | Facilitating tiered service model-based fair allocation of resources for application servers in multi-tenant environments | |
US10671975B2 (en) | Smart streaming of data between external systems and service providers in an on-demand environment | |
US10904122B2 (en) | Facilitating workload-aware shuffling and management of message types in message queues in an on-demand services environment | |
US10776373B2 (en) | Facilitating elastic allocation of organization-specific queue resources in an on-demand services environment | |
US8745625B2 (en) | System, method and computer program product for conditionally executing related reports in parallel based on an estimated execution time | |
US10460270B2 (en) | Systems, methods, and apparatuses for implementing cross-organizational processing of business intelligence metrics | |
US20150046279A1 (en) | Auction-based resource sharing for message queues in an on-demand services environment | |
US10127297B2 (en) | Dynamic integration of disparate database architectures for efficient management of resources in an on-demand services environment | |
US8688640B2 (en) | System, method and computer program product for distributed execution of related reports | |
JP2017530469A (en) | Enriching events with dynamically typed big data for event processing | |
US20120016681A1 (en) | System, method and computer program product for analyzing monitored usage of a resource | |
US20130031054A1 (en) | System, method and computer program product for converting a format of report results | |
US11165857B2 (en) | Connection pool anomaly detection mechanism | |
US20140067852A1 (en) | Mechanism for facilitating scaling and efficient management of database systems and resources in an on-demand services environment | |
US11126351B2 (en) | Policy-based management of disk storage for consumer storge buckets | |
US11636067B2 (en) | Performance measurement mechanism | |
US20210089649A1 (en) | Machine learning anomaly detection mechanism |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SALESFORCE.COM, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:WANG, XIAODAN;DEVADHAR, VIJAYANTH;MURUGESAN, PRAVEEN;REEL/FRAME:030021/0817 Effective date: 20130311 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: MAINTENANCE FEE REMINDER MAILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: REM.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: SURCHARGE FOR LATE PAYMENT, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1554); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 4TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1551); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SALESFORCE, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:SALESFORCE.COM, INC.;REEL/FRAME:069268/0001 Effective date: 20220325 |