Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

US4888106A - Method of using polymeric sulfide mineral depressants - Google Patents

Method of using polymeric sulfide mineral depressants Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US4888106A
US4888106A US07/363,235 US36323589A US4888106A US 4888106 A US4888106 A US 4888106A US 36323589 A US36323589 A US 36323589A US 4888106 A US4888106 A US 4888106A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
polymer
sulfide
depressant
flotation
units
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US07/363,235
Inventor
David W. Lipp
D. R. Nagaraj
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Wyeth Holdings LLC
Original Assignee
American Cyanamid Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US07/182,681 external-priority patent/US4866150A/en
Application filed by American Cyanamid Co filed Critical American Cyanamid Co
Priority to US07/363,235 priority Critical patent/US4888106A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US4888106A publication Critical patent/US4888106A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F220/00—Copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and only one being terminated by only one carboxyl radical or a salt, anhydride ester, amide, imide or nitrile thereof
    • C08F220/02—Monocarboxylic acids having less than ten carbon atoms; Derivatives thereof
    • C08F220/52—Amides or imides
    • C08F220/54—Amides, e.g. N,N-dimethylacrylamide or N-isopropylacrylamide
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00—Flotation
    • B03D1/001—Flotation agents
    • B03D1/002—Inorganic compounds
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00—Flotation
    • B03D1/001—Flotation agents
    • B03D1/004—Organic compounds
    • B03D1/016—Macromolecular compounds
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C08—ORGANIC MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS; THEIR PREPARATION OR CHEMICAL WORKING-UP; COMPOSITIONS BASED THEREON
    • C08F—MACROMOLECULAR COMPOUNDS OBTAINED BY REACTIONS ONLY INVOLVING CARBON-TO-CARBON UNSATURATED BONDS
    • C08F226/00—Copolymers of compounds having one or more unsaturated aliphatic radicals, each having only one carbon-to-carbon double bond, and at least one being terminated by a single or double bond to nitrogen or by a heterocyclic ring containing nitrogen
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00—Flotation
    • B03D1/001—Flotation agents
    • B03D1/004—Organic compounds
    • B03D1/008—Organic compounds containing oxygen
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D1/00—Flotation
    • B03D1/001—Flotation agents
    • B03D1/004—Organic compounds
    • B03D1/012—Organic compounds containing sulfur
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2201/00—Specified effects produced by the flotation agents
    • B03D2201/06—Depressants
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2203/00—Specified materials treated by the flotation agents; Specified applications
    • B03D2203/02—Ores
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
    • B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
    • B03D2203/00—Specified materials treated by the flotation agents; Specified applications
    • B03D2203/02—Ores
    • B03D2203/025—Precious metal ores

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to froth flotation processes for recovery of mineral values from base metal sulfide ores. More particularly, it relates to new and improved sulfide mineral depressants for use in separating or beneficiating sulfide minerals by froth flotation procedures, and to a new and improved process for beneficiating sulfide minerals by froth flotation incorporating said depressants.
  • Modifiers include all reagents whose principle function is neither collection nor frothing, but one of modifying the surface of the mineral so that a collector either adsorbs to it or does not. Modifying agents may thus be considered as depressants, activators, pH regulators, dispersants, deactivators, etc. Often, a modifier may perform several functions simultaneously. Current theory and practice of sulfide flotation again state that the effectiveness of all classes of flotation agents depends to a large extent on the degree of alkalinity or acidity of the ore pulp. As a result, modifiers that regulate the pH are of great importance.
  • the most commonly used pH regulators are lime, soda ash and, to a lesser extent, caustic soda.
  • lime is by far the most extensively used.
  • copper sulfide flotation which dominates the sulfide flotation industry, for example, lime is used to maintain pH values over 10.5.
  • the costs associated with adding lime are becoming quite high and plant operators are interested in flotation processes which require little or no lime addition, e.g., flotation processes which are effectively conducted at slightly alkaline, neutral or even at acid pH values.
  • Neutral and acid circuit flotation processes are particularly desired because pulp slurries may be easily acidified by the addition of sulfuric acid, and sulfuric acid is obtained in many plants as a by-product of the smelters. Therefore, flotation processes which do not require preadjustment of pH to neutral or acid pH values using less expensive sulfuric acid are preferable to current flotation processes, which presently require pH readjustment to highly alkaline values of at least about 11.0 using lime which is more costly.
  • lime consumption in individual plants may vary anywhere from about one pound of lime per metric ton of ore processed up to as high as 20 pounds of lime per metric ton of ore.
  • lime is a scarce commodity, and the current costs of transporting and/or importing lime has risen considerably in recent years.
  • Still another problem with prior art high alkaline processes is that the addition of large quantities of lime to achieve sufficiently high pH causes scale formation on plant and flotation equipment, thereby necessitating frequent and costly plant shutdowns for cleaning.
  • xanthates and dithiophosphates are employed as sulfide collectors in the froth flotation of base metal sulfide ores.
  • a major problem with these sulfide collectors is that at pH's below 11.0, poor rejection of pyrite or pyrrhotite is obtained. More particularly, in accordance with present sulfide flotation theory, the increased flotation of pyrite at a pH of less than 11 is attributed to the ease of oxidation of thio collectors to form corresponding dithiolates, which are believed to be responsible for pyrite flotation.
  • a depressant is a modifier reagent which selectively prevents or inhibits adsorption of the collectors on certain of the mineral particles surfaces present in the flotation slurry or pulp.
  • Prior art sulfide depressants have been generally selected from highly toxic and difficult to handle inorganic compounds such as sodium cyanide, (NaCN), sodium hydro sulfide, (NaSH), and Nokes reagent (P 2 S 5 and NaOH). These conventional sulfide depressants represent a number of serious problems and have serious shortcomings attendant with their use.
  • the oft used depressants are frequently extremely toxic and may be associated with a serious stench. They cannot be used safely over a wide range of pH values, but instead must be used at high pH values, so that lime consumption problems are not solved by their use.
  • the conventional inorganic depressants are often either nonselective or when used in sufficient quantities to provide good separation, provide economically unsatisfactory concentrates, i.e., the yield of value minerals is too low.
  • the problem facing flotation beneficiation methods today is to provide value mineral concentrations which contain substantially reduced levels of gangue sulfide minerals.
  • the flotation concentrates are generally delivered to the smelting operations without any further substantial processing.
  • Large amounts of sulfur dioxide are emitted from the smelters during the smelting of sulfide concentrates; a significant amount of SO 2 is from the gangue sulfide minerals such as iron sulfides, which invariably report to the smelters as contaminants in the flotation concentrates.
  • SO 2 pollution of the atmosphere has always been a serious problem because it is a major cause for acid rain, which has a devastating effect on the ecology. Despite significant advances in smelting technology, SO 2 pollution remains extremely serious.
  • Complex sulfide ores are an important source of many base metals and precious metals. It is quite common to find 3-5 metals in each deposit, in addition to Au, Ag and impurity elements such as Sb, As, Bi and Hg.
  • the treatment method depends on the relative proportions of the different metals, but the more widely used routes are: (a) bulk flotation of sulfides followed by separation of value sulfides, and (b) differential flotation of sulfides. It is necessary to characterize each complex sulfide deposit quantitatively and systematically and then to select the economically optimum combination of process steps to suit the characteristics.
  • Depressants are invariably used in all stages of flotation. Lime, sodium or zinc cyanide, zinc sulfate (often in combination with sodium cyanide), SO 2 , dichromate, dextrine, hypochlorite, and ferro cyanide are some of the most commonly used depressants.
  • the beneficiation criteria for treating the complex sulfide ores are maximum value metal and precious metals (if any) recovery and minimum contamination of the value sulfide concentrate by non-value sulfide minerals. In many cases, these criteria cannot be met without seriously sacrificing value metals production or recovery. Therefore, there remains an urgent need for flotation reagents that can selectively depress gangue sulfide minerals reporting to the concentrate and concurrently provide economically acceptable recoveries of value sulfide minerals.
  • U.S. Pat. Nos. 2832755; 2837499 and 2858295 disclose the copolymerization of vinyl(thioureas with unsaturated comonomers while U.S. Pat. No. 3671492 teaches the copolymerization of thioureas such as N-vinylethylene thiourea with unsaturated monomers. None of this references however, teach the production of polymers falling within the structure set forth hereinbelow and all of the above-cited references fail to teach the use of allyl thiourea copolymers as a depressant in the recovery of mineral values from ores.
  • new and improved sulfide mineral depressants are provided in the form of polymeric compositions, said compositions comprising a polymer comprising: (i) x units of the formula: ##STR1## (ii) y units of the formula: (iii) z units of the formula: wherein R is hydrogen or C 1 -C 4 alkyl; each R 1 and R 2 , individually, is hydrogen or a C 1 -C 4 alkyl group; each R 3 , is hydrogen, a C 1 -C 4 alkyl group or an aryl group, and each R 4 and R 5 is individually, hydrogen, a C 1 -C 4 lower hydrocarbon group or on any dry group, Z represents the polymerization residue of any monomer copolymerizable with units X and Y, x represents a residual mole percent fraction; y is a mole percent fraction ranging from about 1.0% to about 50%, preferably 5-30%, z is a mole percent fraction ranging from about
  • the polymeric compositions comprise polymers within the scope of the above definition which comprise as the Y units, monomeric units wherein R 3 , R 4 and R 5 are hydrogen.
  • compositions of the present invention may be prepared by known polymerization methods whereby the acrylamide component X is copolymerized with the thiourea component Y and, optionally, with comonomer unit Z.
  • suitable polymerization procedures are set forth in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3002960 and 3255142, hereby incorporated herein by reference.
  • the polymers of this invention comprise as the (X) units, those derived from acrylamide per se, alkyl acrylamides such as methacrylamide, etc and N-substituted acrylamide and methacrylamides such as N,N'-dimethylacrylamide, etc.
  • the (Z) units of the polymers defined above generally comprise monomers such as acrylonitrile, styrene, cationics such as diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, methacrylamidopropyl trimethylammonium chloride, acrylamidopropyl trimethylammonium chloride, dimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide, dimethylaminoethyl acrylate or methacrylate, their quaternary salts, acrylic, methacrylic or maleic acids, their alkali metal e.g., sodium or potassium, or ammonium salts, and alkyl esters thereof and the like.
  • monomers such as acrylonitrile, styrene, cationics such as diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, methacrylamidopropyl trimethylammonium chloride, acrylamidopropyl trimethylammonium chloride, dimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide, dimethylaminoethyl
  • the (Y) units of the polymer defined above are derived from thiourea derivatives such as allyl thiourea, N-allyl-N'-methyl thiourea, N-allyl-N'-benzoyl thiourea, N-allyl-N-methyl-N',N'-dimethyl thiourea and the like.
  • novel compositions may be used in flotation processes for important separations; for example, copper sulfides from molybdenite by depressing the former; lead and copper sulfides from pyrite and sphalerite by depressing the latter; pentlandite from pyrrhotite by depressing the latter; copper sulfides or sphalerite from pyrite by depressing the latter, etc.
  • the present invention provides a new and improved method for the beneficiation of value sulfide minerals from sulfide ores with selective rejection of gangue sulfide minerals, said method comprising:
  • the new and improved method for beneficiating value sulfide minerals by froth flotation procedures employing the synthetic depressants in accordance with this invention provides excellent metallurgical recovery with significant improvements in grade.
  • the novel sulfide mineral depressants are effective over a wide range of pH and dosages.
  • the depressants are compatible with available frothers and sulfide mineral collectors and may be readily incorporated into any currently operating system or facility.
  • use of the polymeric sulfide mineral depressants can significantly reduce SO 2 emissions from smelting operations by reducing the amount of gangue sulfide minerals which remain in the value sulfide concentrate to be smelted.
  • the present invention is directed to the selective separation of sulfides, for example, gangue sulfides, from copper ores, copper-molybdenum ores, complex sulfide ores, etc. containing lead, copper, zinc, silver, gold, etc., nickel and nickel-cobalt ores, gold ores and gold-silver ores and to facilitate copper-lead, lead, lead-zinc, copper-zinc separations, etc.
  • sulfides for example, gangue sulfides, from copper ores, copper-molybdenum ores, complex sulfide ores, etc. containing lead, copper, zinc, silver, gold, etc., nickel and nickel-cobalt ores, gold ores and gold-silver ores and to facilitate copper-lead, lead, lead-zinc, copper-zinc separations, etc.
  • Example 1 The procedure of Example 1 is again followed except that 2,2'-azobis(2,4-dimethylvaleronitrile) (ABDV) catalyst is used instead of ammonium pensulfate.
  • ABDV 2,2'-azobis(2,4-dimethylvaleronitrile)
  • the resultant slurry of copolymer is agitated for 10 minutes and the insoluble copolymer is isolated by filtering the slurry through a fritted funnel.
  • the copolymer collected on the funnel is washed with ethyl acetate (200 parts) and vacuum dried to remove unreacted monomers.
  • the intrinsic viscosity of this copolymer is 0.92, indicating a molecular weight of about 135,000.
  • Example 4 The procedure of Example 4 is again followed, i.e., the specified catalyst is used to initiate copolymerizations of acrylamides, allyl thioureas, and optionally a third monomer. All monomers are completely dissolved in ethyl acetate prior to initiation of polymerization. By varying the amount of catalyst and controlling the polymerization temperature, desired molecular weights are obtained as determined by intrinsic viscosities. Analysis of these copolymers show good incorporation of the allylthioureas and, optionally, the third monomer. The compositions prepared are shown in Table II, below.
  • pure pyrite and chalcopyrite charges are used.
  • Flotation tests are carried out in a 250 ml glass cell with a coarse fritted bottom.
  • the as-received large crystals of pyrite and chalcopyrite are crushed and screened to obtain -31 8+35 mesh size fraction.
  • This fraction is stored at all times in a freezer at -18° C.
  • a small sample of pyrite (or chalcopyrite) is ground in an agate mortar with an agate pestle and screened to obtain approximately 1 g. of -100+200 mesh fraction. This fraction is mixed with 9 g.
  • a Cu-Mo bulk concentrate containing 30.5% Cu and 0.72% Mo is used.
  • the objective is to depress Cu and float Mo.
  • the Standard depressants used for this purpose are NaHS at 5-6 lb/t and NaCN at 0.42 lb/t.
  • the results of the evaluation of the novel polymers of this invention are compared against the standard depressants in Table IV.
  • the dosages of the novel polymer and NaHS in Example 38 are unoptimized. Those skilled in the art will be able to readily obtain the best performance at very low dosages of the novel polymer by simply optimizing the dosages of the polymer and NaHS. Although it is not our objective to be bound by any one mechanism for the efficacy of the combination of the novel polymer and NaHS in Cu-Mo separation, one could speculate that the role of the small amount of NaHS used in Example 38 is one of activating/cleaning the Cu sulfide mineral surfaces, so that the novel polymer can adsorb on these selectively rather than on MoS 2 surfaces.
  • the novel polymer adsorbs effectively and selectively on Cu sulfides under appropriate redox potentials.
  • NaHS being a strong reducing and potential determining agent for sulfides, is providing such appropriate redox conditions at controlled dosages.
  • the conditions are too reducing (i.e., very high dosages of NaHS)
  • the adsorption of the novel polymer would be destabilized in a manner similar to the destabilization of the xanthate collectors.
  • the polymer would be adsorbed non-selectively on MoS 2 surfaces, though this adsorption is weak and physical in nature.
  • any other chemical with strongly reducing or oxidizing (in certain minerals systems) properties can be used in conjunction with the novel polymer to obtain appropriate redox conditions.
  • any "surface-modifying" agent can be used to prepare the sulfide surfaces to enhance adsorption of the novel polymers.
  • reagents examples include NaCN, Nokes reagent, mercaptoethanol, thioglycolic acid, Na or K ferri and ferro cyanides, hydroxyethyltrithiocarbonates, and other trithiocarbonates, hydrogen peroxide, ozone, air, oxygen, sulfur dioxide, zinc cyanide, arsenic Nokes, mercaptopropionic acid, mercaptosuccinic acid, other related mercapto acids, 2-thiouracil, thioglycerol and the like.
  • Additional compounds that can be used in conjunction with the novel polymer are given in the publication Nagaraj et al., Trans. IMM, Vol. 95, Mar. 1986, pp. C17. Ratios of these surface modifying agents to the novel polymer hereof range from about 0.05-5.0:1, respectively, preferably about 0.02-2.0:1, although conditions of use and ores treated may vary these amounts somewhat.
  • conditioning time of 20 min. is usually required for standard depressants, whereas with the novel polymer hereof, conditioning times of less than 10 minutes are often quite adequate. This time differential has a significant practical implication in terms of higher throughput and operational cost savings.
  • a different Cu-Mo concentrate is used.
  • the feed contains 28.0% Cu and 3.15% Mo.
  • the Cu sulfide mineral is predominantly chalcopyrite which exhibits a high sensitivity to air oxidation followed by very high floatability. Depression of chalcopyrite with NaHS is therefore only temporary and lasts for about 2 min. after air is turned on during flotation. As a result, both Cu and Mo recoveries are less consistent than those obtained with the previous Cu-Mo sample above.
  • a Cu-graphite bulk concentrate containing 2-10% Cu in the form of copper sulfide minerals and 5-40% carbon is used.
  • the objective is to depress the copper minerals and float graphite; further the amount of copper in the graphite concentrate should be as low as possible.
  • the depressant of the present invention is used to depress the copper minerals.
  • NaHS is used in some tests as a surface conditioning agent for copper sulfides.
  • HETC another reducing agent, is used as a surface conditioning agent along with the polymer of Example 33. The results are set forth in Table VI, below.
  • a Ni-Cu flotation feed to the scavenger circuit is used.
  • This feed is collected in an operating plant and transferred to a central location for flotation testing.
  • the feed consists of the magnetic fraction of the ore and the scavenger concentrate from the non-magnetic fraction.
  • the objectives here are to maximize rejection (depression) of pyrrhotite gangue sulfide contained in the feed, increase the grade of nickel concentrate, and obtain reasonably high Cu and Ni recoveries.
  • the pulp from the plant is already ground and conditioned with a xanthate collector and a frother.
  • the pulp is conditioned with the depressant for 2 min. at a pH of 9.5-10.5 and floated in a Denver flotation cell at 1400 rpm with an air flow rate in the range of 3-5 l/min.
  • Timed flotation concentrates are taken and assayed for Cu, Ni and S.
  • Table VI provide an excellent demonstration of the efficacy of the polymers of the present invention as selective depressants.
  • the polymer gives a 56% reduction in pyrrhotite with 14 units loss in Ni recovery and 7 units loss in Cu recovery.
  • the loss in Ni recovery in this circuit is to be expected since a significant amount of Ni is actually in solid solution with pyrrhotite, and this bound nickel will be depressed if pyrrhotite is depressed.
  • An appropriate indicator of selectivity between free nickel and pyrrhotite is the index I in Table VI.
  • the index I is 1.1 in the absence of any depressant.
  • the ratio remains unaltered thereby indicating that with respect to pyrrhotite in the tails, no additional free nickel is lost.
  • the polymer indeed provides selective depression of pyrrhotite.
  • Example 46 The procedure as set forth in Example 46 is followed in this example except that a new feed which is much higher in Po is used and a different batch of the depressant polymer is used.
  • Table VII demonstrate that the polymer provides a selective depression of pyrrhotite (the recovery decreases from 50.5% in the absence of depressant to 33% at 56 g/t of depressant; a reduction of 35%).
  • the copper loss is only 2.8 units and the Ni loss is about 11 units.
  • the I value is even slightly lower than that in the control test indicating that the depressant is indeed selective.
  • Example 46 The procedure as described in Example 46 is followed, but the feed containing 1.5% Cu, 2.4% Ni and 35% Po is from a different mill.
  • the pyrrhotite in this feed floats quite excessively and it is very difficult to depress.
  • the objectives here are once again to reject as much Po as possible in the process of recovering Ni.
  • a larger fraction of the Po contains the valuable Ni in intimate association or solid solution. Consequently, with the depression of Po, some Ni losses are inevitable.
  • Table IX The results are set forth in Table IX.
  • a massive complex sulfide ore containing Zn, Cu and Fe sulfides is ground to about 45%-200m, conditioned with H 2 SO 4 and ethyl xanthate and a frother, floated at acid pH (4-7) to obtain a bulk sulfide concentrate which is cleaned, reground with lime (85%-200M) and conditioned with sodium silicate and sodium cyanide at pH 10.5-10.8.
  • conditioned pulp is floated to recover as much copper selectively as possible, rejecting both iron and zinc sulfides.
  • pulp containing approximately 1800 parts of dry solids, is collected directly from the plant zinc circuit and is conditioned for 1 min. with lime to give a pH of 11.0 followed by conditioning for 2 min. with the depressant.
  • the pulp is then conditioned with copper sulfate to activate sphalerite, sodium isobutyl xanthate collector and a polypropylene glycol frother.
  • conditioned pulp is floated in several stages to collect timed concentrates. The results are given in Table XII, below.
  • the objective here is to reduce the amount of Pb and Cu reporting to the zinc concentrate and to produce a high grade zinc concentrate. It is evident from the results that the use of the polymer of the present invention increased the grade of zinc in the concentrate from 31.5% Zn to 36.3% while decreasing Cu and Pb recoveries.
  • a complex Pb-Zn-Fe-ore is used for these examples.
  • 500 Parts of the as-received -10 mesh ore are ground in a ball mill for 20 min. at 60% solids with lime to provide the desired pH.
  • the ground pulp is conditioned for 2 min. with sodium isobutyl xanthate, a commercially available dithiophosphate collector and the depressant employed.
  • Rougher and scavenger flotation is then carried out for 2 and 4 minutes respectively, and the products are assayed for Pb, Zn and Fe.
  • the objective here is to recover as much Pb as possible with rejection of Zn and especially Fe (as iron sulfides).
  • Example 52 With the use of the acryl-amide-allyl droxy ethyl thiourea copolymer at only 400 g/t, the iron recovery is reduced from 73% to 39% (Example 52); zinc recovery is slightly lower (27% vs 30%) and lead loss is merely 4 units which can be either tolerated or recovered in another flotation operation using selective reactivation with a xanthat or dithiophosphate collector.
  • the depressant in Example 52 is split equally between rougher and scavenger 200+200 g/t (Example 53) there is further reduction in iron recovery from 39% to 34%.
  • Example 53 With the use of an acrylmide-allyl methyl thiourea copolymer, the iron recovery is only 19% compared with the 73% obtained with zinc sulfate (see Example 54.)
  • the dosage is, therefore, reduced to 200 g/t (Example 55).
  • the iron recovery is only 13% (vs. 73% for zinc sulfate).
  • the lead recovery is low (67%), but this can be improved by further decreasing the depressant dosage or by selective reactivation - flotation.
  • the zinc recovery is also substantially reduced (16% vs. 30% for zinc sulfate) which is an added benefit.
  • Example 57 demonstrates that the polymer's depressant activity is maintained even upon introduction of acrylic acid units in the polymer.
  • the acrylic acid group's carboxyl functionality provides additional hydrophilic character to the polymer without affecting the depressant activity which is attributable to the thiourea functionality.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)

Abstract

Various acrylamide/allyl thiourea polymers and their use as depressants in the beneficiation of sulfide minerals from ores are disclosed.

Description

This is a divisional of copending application Ser. No. 182.681, filed on Apr. 18, 1988.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to froth flotation processes for recovery of mineral values from base metal sulfide ores. More particularly, it relates to new and improved sulfide mineral depressants for use in separating or beneficiating sulfide minerals by froth flotation procedures, and to a new and improved process for beneficiating sulfide minerals by froth flotation incorporating said depressants.
Certain theory and practice state that the success of the sulfide flotation process depends to a great degree on reagents called collectors that impart selective hydrophobicity to the mineral value which has to be separated from other minerals.
Certain other important reagents, such as the modifiers, are also largely responsible for the success of flotation separation of the sulfide and other minerals. Modifiers include all reagents whose principle function is neither collection nor frothing, but one of modifying the surface of the mineral so that a collector either adsorbs to it or does not. Modifying agents may thus be considered as depressants, activators, pH regulators, dispersants, deactivators, etc. Often, a modifier may perform several functions simultaneously. Current theory and practice of sulfide flotation again state that the effectiveness of all classes of flotation agents depends to a large extent on the degree of alkalinity or acidity of the ore pulp. As a result, modifiers that regulate the pH are of great importance. The most commonly used pH regulators are lime, soda ash and, to a lesser extent, caustic soda. In sulfide flotation, however, lime is by far the most extensively used. In copper sulfide flotation, which dominates the sulfide flotation industry, for example, lime is used to maintain pH values over 10.5. The costs associated with adding lime are becoming quite high and plant operators are interested in flotation processes which require little or no lime addition, e.g., flotation processes which are effectively conducted at slightly alkaline, neutral or even at acid pH values. Neutral and acid circuit flotation processes are particularly desired because pulp slurries may be easily acidified by the addition of sulfuric acid, and sulfuric acid is obtained in many plants as a by-product of the smelters. Therefore, flotation processes which do not require preadjustment of pH to neutral or acid pH values using less expensive sulfuric acid are preferable to current flotation processes, which presently require pH readjustment to highly alkaline values of at least about 11.0 using lime which is more costly.
As has been mentioned above, lime consumption in individual plants may vary anywhere from about one pound of lime per metric ton of ore processed up to as high as 20 pounds of lime per metric ton of ore. In certain geographical locations, such as South America, lime is a scarce commodity, and the current costs of transporting and/or importing lime has risen considerably in recent years. Still another problem with prior art high alkaline processes is that the addition of large quantities of lime to achieve sufficiently high pH causes scale formation on plant and flotation equipment, thereby necessitating frequent and costly plant shutdowns for cleaning.
It is apparent, therefore, that there is a strong desire to reduce or eliminate the need for adding lime to sulfide flotation processes to thereby provide substantial savings in reagents costs. In addition, reducing or eliminating lime in sulfide ore processes will provide other advantages by facilitating the operation and practice of unit operations other than flotation, such as fluids handling or solids handling, as well as the improved recovery of secondary minerals.
In general, xanthates and dithiophosphates are employed as sulfide collectors in the froth flotation of base metal sulfide ores. A major problem with these sulfide collectors is that at pH's below 11.0, poor rejection of pyrite or pyrrhotite is obtained. More particularly, in accordance with present sulfide flotation theory, the increased flotation of pyrite at a pH of less than 11 is attributed to the ease of oxidation of thio collectors to form corresponding dithiolates, which are believed to be responsible for pyrite flotation.
In addition to attempts at making the sulfide collectors more selective for value sulfide minerals, other approaches to the problem of improving the flotation separation of value sulfides have included the use of modifiers, more particularly depressants, to depress the non-value sulfide minerals and gangue minerals so that they do not float in the presence of collectors, thereby reducing the levels of non-value sulfide contaminants reporting to the concentrates. As has been mentioned above, a depressant is a modifier reagent which selectively prevents or inhibits adsorption of the collectors on certain of the mineral particles surfaces present in the flotation slurry or pulp. Prior art sulfide depressants have been generally selected from highly toxic and difficult to handle inorganic compounds such as sodium cyanide, (NaCN), sodium hydro sulfide, (NaSH), and Nokes reagent (P2 S5 and NaOH). These conventional sulfide depressants represent a number of serious problems and have serious shortcomings attendant with their use. The oft used depressants are frequently extremely toxic and may be associated with a terrible stench. They cannot be used safely over a wide range of pH values, but instead must be used at high pH values, so that lime consumption problems are not solved by their use. Moreover, the conventional inorganic depressants are often either nonselective or when used in sufficient quantities to provide good separation, provide economically unsatisfactory concentrates, i.e., the yield of value minerals is too low.
The problem facing flotation beneficiation methods today is to provide value mineral concentrations which contain substantially reduced levels of gangue sulfide minerals. The flotation concentrates are generally delivered to the smelting operations without any further substantial processing. Large amounts of sulfur dioxide are emitted from the smelters during the smelting of sulfide concentrates; a significant amount of SO2 is from the gangue sulfide minerals such as iron sulfides, which invariably report to the smelters as contaminants in the flotation concentrates. SO2 pollution of the atmosphere has always been a serious problem because it is a major cause for acid rain, which has a devastating effect on the ecology. Despite significant advances in smelting technology, SO2 pollution remains extremely serious.
Complex sulfide ores are an important source of many base metals and precious metals. It is quite common to find 3-5 metals in each deposit, in addition to Au, Ag and impurity elements such as Sb, As, Bi and Hg. The treatment method depends on the relative proportions of the different metals, but the more widely used routes are: (a) bulk flotation of sulfides followed by separation of value sulfides, and (b) differential flotation of sulfides. It is necessary to characterize each complex sulfide deposit quantitatively and systematically and then to select the economically optimum combination of process steps to suit the characteristics. Depressants are invariably used in all stages of flotation. Lime, sodium or zinc cyanide, zinc sulfate (often in combination with sodium cyanide), SO2, dichromate, dextrine, hypochlorite, and ferro cyanide are some of the most commonly used depressants.
The beneficiation criteria for treating the complex sulfide ores are maximum value metal and precious metals (if any) recovery and minimum contamination of the value sulfide concentrate by non-value sulfide minerals. In many cases, these criteria cannot be met without seriously sacrificing value metals production or recovery. Therefore, there remains an urgent need for flotation reagents that can selectively depress gangue sulfide minerals reporting to the concentrate and concurrently provide economically acceptable recoveries of value sulfide minerals.
Unexpectedly, in view of the foregoing, it has now been discovered that certain synthetic polymers which contain certain functional groups are very effective depressants for all sulfide numerals in general, and, more particularly, for pyrite, pyrrhotite, and other gangue sulfide minerals. The use of the depressants of the present invention provides a substantial reduction in gangue sulfide minerals contamination in the sulfide minerals concentrates reporting to the smelters, thereby reducing the adverse environmental impact of SO2 emissions caused by smelting operations in the industry. It has also been discovered that the instant polymers unexpectedly depress one or more value sulfide minerals in the presence of other value sulfides or non-sulfides under appropriate dosage and/or other operating conditions.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The copolymerization of allyl thioureas with acrylamides has not been disclosed in the prior art. Allyl thioureas have, however, been copolymerized with other materials such as sulfur dioxide (U.S. Pat. No. 3386972) and vinyl chloride (U.S. Pat. No. 3012010). These copolymerizations are not suggestive, however, of the copolymers of the present invention.
Additionally, U.S. Pat. Nos. 2832755; 2837499 and 2858295 disclose the copolymerization of vinyl(thioureas with unsaturated comonomers while U.S. Pat. No. 3671492 teaches the copolymerization of thioureas such as N-vinylethylene thiourea with unsaturated monomers. None of this references however, teach the production of polymers falling within the structure set forth hereinbelow and all of the above-cited references fail to teach the use of allyl thiourea copolymers as a depressant in the recovery of mineral values from ores.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, new and improved sulfide mineral depressants are provided in the form of polymeric compositions, said compositions comprising a polymer comprising: (i) x units of the formula: ##STR1## (ii) y units of the formula: (iii) z units of the formula: wherein R is hydrogen or C1 -C4 alkyl; each R1 and R2, individually, is hydrogen or a C1 -C4 alkyl group; each R3, is hydrogen, a C1 -C4 alkyl group or an aryl group, and each R4 and R5 is individually, hydrogen, a C1 -C4 lower hydrocarbon group or on any dry group, Z represents the polymerization residue of any monomer copolymerizable with units X and Y, x represents a residual mole percent fraction; y is a mole percent fraction ranging from about 1.0% to about 50%, preferably 5-30%, z is a mole percent fraction ranging from about 0% to about 50%; preferably 0-30%, and the molecular weight of the polymer ranges from about 1,000 to about 1,000,000.
In preferred embodiments, the polymeric compositions comprise polymers within the scope of the above definition which comprise as the Y units, monomeric units wherein R3, R4 and R5 are hydrogen.
The new and improved compositions of the present invention may be prepared by known polymerization methods whereby the acrylamide component X is copolymerized with the thiourea component Y and, optionally, with comonomer unit Z. Examples of suitable polymerization procedures are set forth in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3002960 and 3255142, hereby incorporated herein by reference.
More particularly, the polymers of this invention comprise as the (X) units, those derived from acrylamide per se, alkyl acrylamides such as methacrylamide, etc and N-substituted acrylamide and methacrylamides such as N,N'-dimethylacrylamide, etc.
The (Z) units of the polymers defined above generally comprise monomers such as acrylonitrile, styrene, cationics such as diallyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, methacrylamidopropyl trimethylammonium chloride, acrylamidopropyl trimethylammonium chloride, dimethylaminopropyl methacrylamide, dimethylaminoethyl acrylate or methacrylate, their quaternary salts, acrylic, methacrylic or maleic acids, their alkali metal e.g., sodium or potassium, or ammonium salts, and alkyl esters thereof and the like.
The (Y) units of the polymer defined above are derived from thiourea derivatives such as allyl thiourea, N-allyl-N'-methyl thiourea, N-allyl-N'-benzoyl thiourea, N-allyl-N-methyl-N',N'-dimethyl thiourea and the like. These novel compositions may be used in flotation processes for important separations; for example, copper sulfides from molybdenite by depressing the former; lead and copper sulfides from pyrite and sphalerite by depressing the latter; pentlandite from pyrrhotite by depressing the latter; copper sulfides or sphalerite from pyrite by depressing the latter, etc.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a new and improved method for the beneficiation of value sulfide minerals from sulfide ores with selective rejection of gangue sulfide minerals, said method comprising:
(a) providing an aqueous pulp slurry of finely divided, liberation-sized ore particles:
(b) conditioning said pulp slurry with an effective amount of a synthetic depressant, a sulfide mineral collector and a frothing agent, said synthetic depressant comprising a polymer comprising: (i) x units of the formula: ##STR2## (ii) y units of the formula: (iii) z units of the formula: wherein R is hydrogen or C1 -C4 lower alkyl; each R1 and R2 is, individually, hydrogen or C1 -C4 lower alkyl; R3 is hydrogen, a C1 -C4 alkyl group or an aryl group and each R4 and R5 is, individually, hydrogen, a C1 -C4 hydrocarbon group or an aryl group; Z represents the polymerization residue of any monomer copolymerizable with units X and Y, x represents a residual mole percent fraction; y is a mole percent fraction ranging from 1.0 to about 50%; preferably 5-30%; z is a mole percent fraction ranging from about 0% to about 50%; preferably 0-30% and the molecular weight of said polymer ranges from about 1000 to about 1,000,000; and,
(c) collecting the value sulfide mineral by froth flotation procedures.
The new and improved method for beneficiating value sulfide minerals by froth flotation procedures employing the synthetic depressants in accordance with this invention provides excellent metallurgical recovery with significant improvements in grade. The novel sulfide mineral depressants are effective over a wide range of pH and dosages. The depressants are compatible with available frothers and sulfide mineral collectors and may be readily incorporated into any currently operating system or facility. Moreover, use of the polymeric sulfide mineral depressants can significantly reduce SO2 emissions from smelting operations by reducing the amount of gangue sulfide minerals which remain in the value sulfide concentrate to be smelted.
The present invention is directed to the selective separation of sulfides, for example, gangue sulfides, from copper ores, copper-molybdenum ores, complex sulfide ores, etc. containing lead, copper, zinc, silver, gold, etc., nickel and nickel-cobalt ores, gold ores and gold-silver ores and to facilitate copper-lead, lead, lead-zinc, copper-zinc separations, etc.
The following examples are set forth for purposes of illustration only and are not to be construed as limitations on the present invention, except as set forth in the appended claims. All parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise specified.
EXAMPLE 1
Acrylamide (9.0 parts) and N-allylthiourea (1.0 part) are dissolved in water (90 parts) and added to a suitable vessel equipped with a nitrogen gas inlet tube and an agitator. The solution is stirred, agitated for 30 minutes and heated to 50° C. Polymerization initiator ammonium persulfate (0.05 part) is dissolved in water (5.0 parts) and the solution sparged with nitrogen for 10 minutes. The initiator solution is added and after 3 hours the reaction is complete. The copolymer is recovered and analyzed. The intrinsic viscosity is found to be 0.48 which corresponds to a molecular weight of about 50,000. The 13 C N.M.R., IR and elemental analysis of the copolymer show about 6 mole percent incorporation of the allyl thiourea therein.
EXAMPLE 2
The procedure of Example 1 is again followed except that 2,2'-azobis(2,4-dimethylvaleronitrile) (ABDV) catalyst is used instead of ammonium pensulfate. A copolymer with an intrinsic viscosity of 1.67, which corresponds to a molecular weight of about 300,000, is obtained. Analysis of this copolymer shows that the copolymer contains about 6 mole percent allyl thiourea.
EXAMPLE 3
To a suitable three-necked flask, equipped with a mechanical stirrer and a condenser, are added 7.5 parts of allyl thiourea (0.0645 mole) and 287 parts of water with stirring. The pH of the solution is adjusted to 4.4 with dilute sulfuric acid. The contents of the flask are gently heated to 60° C. while sparging with nitrogen. About 3 parts of a catalyst system similar to that used in Example 1 and 82.4 parts of 50% acrylamide (0.58 mole) are then charged, gradually over a period of 2-3 hours. Polymerization is complete in approximately 4-6 hours. The finished copolymer has an intrinsic viscosity of about 0.15 DL/g and an average molecular weight of about 6000.
EXAMPLE 4
Acrylamide (9.0 parts) and N-allylthiourea (1.0 part) are dissolved in ethyl acetate (85 parts). This solution is added to a suitable reaction vessel equipped with a nitrogen gas inlet tube and an agitator. The solution is agitated for 30 minutes and heated to 50° C. Polymerization initiator, 2,2'-azobis (2,4dimethylvaleronitrile), (0.05 part) is dissolved in ethyl acetate (5 parts) and the solution is sparged with nitrogen for 10 minutes. The initiator solution is added and after 3 hours the reaction is complete. To the polymerization vessel is added ethyl acetate (100 parts). The resultant slurry of copolymer is agitated for 10 minutes and the insoluble copolymer is isolated by filtering the slurry through a fritted funnel. The copolymer collected on the funnel is washed with ethyl acetate (200 parts) and vacuum dried to remove unreacted monomers. The intrinsic viscosity of this copolymer is 0.92, indicating a molecular weight of about 135,000.
EXAMPLES 5-18
The procedures of Examples 1 and 2 are again followed, i.e., either ammonium persulfate (APS) or ABDV is used to initiate the polymerizations. The compositions prepared are shown in Table I, below. Mercaptoethanol is used as a chain transfer agent.
                                  TABLE I                                 
__________________________________________________________________________
(Weight %)                            Mercaptoethanol                     
            Y units                   PPM on total                        
     X units                                                              
            R.sub.3 = H               monomers Molecular                  
Example                                                                   
     R.sub.1, R.sub.2                                                     
            R.sub.4, R.sub.5 =                                            
                       Z units   Catalyst                                 
                                      (wt)     Weight                     
__________________________________________________________________________
5    H,H(90)                                                              
            H,H(10)    --        ABDV 3,000    200,000                    
6    H,H(90)                                                              
            H,H(10)    --        ABDV 6,000    132,000                    
7    H,H(90)                                                              
            H,CH.sub.3 (d10)                                              
                       --        ABDV 12,000   78,000                     
8    H,H(90)                                                              
            H,--CH.sub.2 CH.sub.2 OH(10)                                  
                       -- APS    --   62,000                              
9    H,H(80)                                                              
            H,H--CH.sub.2 CH.sub.2 OH(10)                                 
                       AA.sup.1 (10)                                      
                                 ABDV --       235,000                    
10   H,H(80)                                                              
            H,H(10)    AA (10)   ABDV --       185,000                    
11   AA.sup.1 (10)                                                        
            H,H(10)    DADMAC.sup.2 (10)                                  
                                 ABDV --       52,000                     
12   AA.sup.1 (10)                                                        
            H,H(10)    MAPTAC.sup.3 (10)                                  
                                 ABDV --       160,000                    
13   AA.sup.1 (10)                                                        
            H,H(10)    APTAC.sup.4 (10)                                   
                                 ABDV 3,000    84,000                     
14   CH.sub.3,CH.sub.3 (90)                                               
            H,H(10)    --        ABDV 3,000    225,000                    
15   CH.sup.3,CH.sub.3 (70)                                               
            H,H(20)    DMAEMMC.sup.5 (10)                                 
                                 ABDV 3,000    260,000                    
16   H,H(90)                                                              
            H,H(10)    --        ABDV 24,000   30,000                     
17   H,H(90)                                                              
            H,H(10)    --        APS  24,000   15,000                     
18   H,H(70)                                                              
            H,H(10)    AA(20)    APS  24,000   15,000                     
__________________________________________________________________________
 .sup.1 Acrylic Acid = (AA)                                               
 .sup.2 Diallyldimethyl ammonium chloride (DADMAC)                        
 .sup.3 Methacrylamidopropyltrimethyl ammonium chloride (MAPTAC)          
 .sup.4 Acrylamidopropyltrimethylammonium chloride (APTAC)                
 .sup.5 Dimethylaminoethylmethacrylate/methyl chloride quaternary.        
 (DMAEMMC)
EXAMPLES 19-31 The procedure of Example 4 is again followed, i.e., the specified catalyst is used to initiate copolymerizations of acrylamides, allyl thioureas, and optionally a third monomer. All monomers are completely dissolved in ethyl acetate prior to initiation of polymerization. By varying the amount of catalyst and controlling the polymerization temperature, desired molecular weights are obtained as determined by intrinsic viscosities. Analysis of these copolymers show good incorporation of the allylthioureas and, optionally, the third monomer. The compositions prepared are shown in Table II, below. 
                                  TABLE II                                
__________________________________________________________________________
Example                                                                   
      X units Y units     Z units                                         
                                Molecular Weight                          
__________________________________________________________________________
      R.sub.1,R.sub.2                                                     
              R.sub.3 = H --                                              
              R.sub.4,R.sub.5                                             
19    H,H(95) H,H(5)      --    180,000                                   
20    H,H(80) H,H(20)           74,000                                    
21    H,H(90) H,H(5)      AA.sup.1 (5)                                    
                                210,000                                   
22    H,H(85) H,H(5)      AA(10)                                          
                                205,000                                   
23    H,H(75) H,H(5)      AA(20)                                          
                                205,000                                   
24    H,H(85) H,H(10)     AA(5) 100,000                                   
25    H,H(90) H,CH.sub.3 (10)                                             
                          --    120,000                                   
26    H,H(90) H,2-hydroxy --    175,000                                   
              ethyl(10)                                                   
27    H,H(90) H,n-Butyl(10)                                               
                          --    183,000                                   
28    H,H(90) H,n-phenyl(10)                                              
                          --    63,000                                    
29    H,H(90)                                                             
               ##STR3##   --    27,000                                    
30    H,H(90) H,tert Butyl(10)                                            
                          --    50,000                                    
31    CH.sub.3,CH.sub.3 (90)                                              
              H,H(10)     --    215,000                                   
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLES 32-35
In these examples, pure pyrite and chalcopyrite charges are used. Flotation tests are carried out in a 250 ml glass cell with a coarse fritted bottom. The as-received large crystals of pyrite and chalcopyrite are crushed and screened to obtain -31 8+35 mesh size fraction. This fraction is stored at all times in a freezer at -18° C. Just before a flotation test, a small sample of pyrite (or chalcopyrite) is ground in an agate mortar with an agate pestle and screened to obtain approximately 1 g. of -100+200 mesh fraction. This fraction is mixed with 9 g. of clean -48+65 or -65+100 mesh quartz and the mixture is suspended in 240 ml distilled water containing 2×10-3 M KNO3 (to maintain ionic strength) and conditioned as follows: (a) 1 min. for pH adjustment to 8.5 with KOH and HNO3, (b) 2 min. with 5 ml of 5×10-3 M sodium isopropyl xanthate (this was sufficient to give almost complete flotation of pyrite), c) 2 min. with 2 or 10 ppm depressant and 2.5 ml of 3000 ppm methylisobutyl carbinol (MIBC) frother solution (30 ppm final concentration). Flotation is then carried out by passing nitrogen until no more solids are floating. The concentrates and tails are filtered separately, dried and weighed.
The test results are given in Table III. It is evident that the polymers effectively depress pyrite and chalcopyrite.
              TABLE III                                                   
______________________________________                                    
                      Wt % Floated                                        
                Dosage                                                    
                      Individual                                          
Example                                                                   
       Depressant     ppm     Pyrite                                      
                                    Chalcopyrite                          
______________________________________                                    
A      None           --      95.0  97.0                                  
B1     NaCN           2.0     32.0  58.0                                  
B2     NaCN           10.0    2.0   3.0                                   
C      NaHS           10.0    85.0  41.0                                  
32     Copolymer of   2.0     2.5   3.0                                   
       Example 1                                                          
33     Copolymer of Acryl-                                                
                      2.0     5.0   1.0                                   
       amide and diallyl                                                  
                      (90/10)                                             
       thiourea                                                           
34     Copolymer of   2.0     15.0  1.0                                   
       Example 7      (90/10)                                             
35     Copolymer of   2.0     2.0   0.5                                   
       Example 26     (90/10)                                             
______________________________________
EXAMPLES 36-38
In these examples, a Cu-Mo bulk concentrate containing 30.5% Cu and 0.72% Mo is used. The objective is to depress Cu and float Mo. The Standard depressants used for this purpose are NaHS at 5-6 lb/t and NaCN at 0.42 lb/t. The results of the evaluation of the novel polymers of this invention are compared against the standard depressants in Table IV.
With the standard depressants (5.3 lb/t NaHS and 0.42 lb/t NaCN), the copper recovery is 5.5% and molybdenum recovery is 93.8%. At a very high dosage of the novel polymer of Example 3 (viz. 2.72 lb/t) both Cu and Mo are severely depressed (Example 36) thereby indicating no selectivity and that lower dosages will have to be used. At the lower dosage of only 0.91 lb/t, the Cu recovery is 20% and Mo recovery is 77.8% (Example 37), thus indicating vastly improved selectivity. The best result, however, is obtained when the polymer is used at 0.8 lb/t in conjunction with 1.1 lb/t of NaHS (Example 38); Cu recovery is only 5.7% which compares very well with the 5.5% recovery obtained at high dosages of the standard depressants and the Mo recovery is 87.2% which is also quite satisfactory. It must be noted that no NaCN is used in this example.
              TABLE IV                                                    
______________________________________                                    
                          Cu   Cu     Mo   Mo                             
Example             Dosage                                                
                          rec  grade  rec. grade                          
Number Depressant   lb/t  %    % Cu   %    % Mo                           
______________________________________                                    
D      Std. NaHS  5.3     5.5  25.0   93.8 9.9                            
       plus NaCN  0.42                                                    
36     Polymer of 2.72    3.5  31.2   8.3  1.79                           
       Example 3                                                          
37     "          0.9     20.0 21.8   77.8 3.22                           
38     "          0.8     5.7  26.3   87.2 9.1                            
       plus NaHS  1.1                                                     
______________________________________
It must also be noted that the dosages of the novel polymer and NaHS in Example 38 are unoptimized. Those skilled in the art will be able to readily obtain the best performance at very low dosages of the novel polymer by simply optimizing the dosages of the polymer and NaHS. Although it is not our objective to be bound by any one mechanism for the efficacy of the combination of the novel polymer and NaHS in Cu-Mo separation, one could speculate that the role of the small amount of NaHS used in Example 38 is one of activating/cleaning the Cu sulfide mineral surfaces, so that the novel polymer can adsorb on these selectively rather than on MoS2 surfaces. Stated differently, the novel polymer adsorbs effectively and selectively on Cu sulfides under appropriate redox potentials. NaHS, being a strong reducing and potential determining agent for sulfides, is providing such appropriate redox conditions at controlled dosages. One can also speculate that if the conditions are too reducing (i.e., very high dosages of NaHS), the adsorption of the novel polymer would be destabilized in a manner similar to the destabilization of the xanthate collectors. Under these conditions, as also in the absence of NaHS, the polymer would be adsorbed non-selectively on MoS2 surfaces, though this adsorption is weak and physical in nature.
It must be noted that any other chemical with strongly reducing or oxidizing (in certain minerals systems) properties can be used in conjunction with the novel polymer to obtain appropriate redox conditions. In other words, any "surface-modifying" agent can be used to prepare the sulfide surfaces to enhance adsorption of the novel polymers. Examples of such reagents include NaCN, Nokes reagent, mercaptoethanol, thioglycolic acid, Na or K ferri and ferro cyanides, hydroxyethyltrithiocarbonates, and other trithiocarbonates, hydrogen peroxide, ozone, air, oxygen, sulfur dioxide, zinc cyanide, arsenic Nokes, mercaptopropionic acid, mercaptosuccinic acid, other related mercapto acids, 2-thiouracil, thioglycerol and the like. Additional compounds that can be used in conjunction with the novel polymer are given in the publication Nagaraj et al., Trans. IMM, Vol. 95, Mar. 1986, pp. C17. Ratios of these surface modifying agents to the novel polymer hereof range from about 0.05-5.0:1, respectively, preferably about 0.02-2.0:1, although conditions of use and ores treated may vary these amounts somewhat.
A further point to note is that a conditioning time of 20 min. is usually required for standard depressants, whereas with the novel polymer hereof, conditioning times of less than 10 minutes are often quite adequate. This time differential has a significant practical implication in terms of higher throughput and operational cost savings.
EXAMPLE 39
In this example, a different Cu-Mo concentrate is used. The feed contains 28.0% Cu and 3.15% Mo. The Cu sulfide mineral is predominantly chalcopyrite which exhibits a high sensitivity to air oxidation followed by very high floatability. Depression of chalcopyrite with NaHS is therefore only temporary and lasts for about 2 min. after air is turned on during flotation. As a result, both Cu and Mo recoveries are less consistent than those obtained with the previous Cu-Mo sample above.
The results are given in Table V. With the standard NaHS depressant, a dosage of 3.7 to 6.87 lb/t gives Cu recoveries in the range of 6.7 to 15.8% and Mo recoveries in the range of 78.8 to 95.4% (Examples E-G). When the novel polymer of the present invention is used at 0.80 lb/t in conjunction with about 1.3 lbs/t of NaHS, the Cu recovery obtained is 8.4% and the Mo recovery is 82.6% (Example 39) which are both acceptable and comparable to those obtained with the standard NaHS depressant. It is observed during the flotation tests that a conditioning time of 15 min. is required for NaHS whereas a conditioning time of only 5 minutes is adequate with the polymer. Also depression with the polymer is longer lasting than with NaHS.
              TABLE V                                                     
______________________________________                                    
                    Dos-   Cu   Cu    Mo   Mo                             
Example             age    rec  grade rec. grade                          
Number Depressant   lb/t   %    % Cu  %    % Mo                           
______________________________________                                    
E      Std. NaHS    3.7    14.3 22.0  89.0 15.3                           
F      Std. NaHS    5.4    6.7  17.7  78.8 24.3                           
G      Std. NaHS    6.87   15.8 22.0  95.4 14.2                           
39     Polymer of Ex 3                                                    
                    0.80   8.4  18.7  82.6 21.1                           
       plus NaHS }  1.3                                                   
______________________________________
EXAMPLES 40-45
In these examples, a Cu-graphite bulk concentrate containing 2-10% Cu in the form of copper sulfide minerals and 5-40% carbon is used. The objective is to depress the copper minerals and float graphite; further the amount of copper in the graphite concentrate should be as low as possible. The depressant of the present invention is used to depress the copper minerals. NaHS is used in some tests as a surface conditioning agent for copper sulfides. In one test, HETC, another reducing agent, is used as a surface conditioning agent along with the polymer of Example 33. The results are set forth in Table VI, below.
                                  TABLE VI                                
__________________________________________________________________________
                    Cu-Conc.                                              
Example       Dosage                                                      
                    Cu Rec                                                
                          Grade                                           
                              Graphite Conc.                              
#    Depressant                                                           
              g/t   %     % Cu                                            
                              % Cu                                        
__________________________________________________________________________
                    Feed Cu 10.3%                                         
H    None           2.1   2.24                                            
                              11.25                                       
40   Polymer of                                                           
              500   80.5  14.41                                           
                              4.72                                        
     Ex. 3                                                                
41   Polymer of                                                           
              500 + 500                                                   
                    70.1  20.9                                            
                              4.64                                        
     Ex. 3 + NaHS                                                         
42   Polymer of                                                           
              750   89.6  12.81                                           
                              3.69                                        
     Ex. 3                                                                
43   Polymer of                                                           
              750 + 200                                                   
                    95.6  12.61                                           
                              2.08                                        
     Ex. 3 + NaHS                                                         
                    Feed Cu 2.2%                                          
I    None           9.7   1.451                                           
                              2.269                                       
44   Polymer of                                                           
              500   94.8  2.732                                           
                              0.47                                        
     Ex. 3                                                                
                    Feed Cu 4.0%                                          
J    HETC*    1233  91.4  5.64                                            
                              0.943                                       
45   Polymer of                                                           
              73 + 400                                                    
                    94.8  4.96                                            
                              0.914                                       
     Example 3 +                                                          
     HETC*                                                                
__________________________________________________________________________
 *2-hydroxyethyl trithiocarbonate
These results demonstrate clearly the improvement in Cu-Graphite separation obtained with the use of the polymers of the present invention; they also demonstrate the improvement in the sharpness of separation when a surface conditioning agent is used in conjunction with the polymers of the present invention.
Example 46
In this example, a Ni-Cu flotation feed to the scavenger circuit is used. This feed is collected in an operating plant and transferred to a central location for flotation testing. The feed consists of the magnetic fraction of the ore and the scavenger concentrate from the non-magnetic fraction. The objectives here are to maximize rejection (depression) of pyrrhotite gangue sulfide contained in the feed, increase the grade of nickel concentrate, and obtain reasonably high Cu and Ni recoveries.
The pulp from the plant is already ground and conditioned with a xanthate collector and a frother. The pulp is conditioned with the depressant for 2 min. at a pH of 9.5-10.5 and floated in a Denver flotation cell at 1400 rpm with an air flow rate in the range of 3-5 l/min. Timed flotation concentrates are taken and assayed for Cu, Ni and S. The results in Table VI provide an excellent demonstration of the efficacy of the polymers of the present invention as selective depressants. At 50 g/t, the polymer gives a 56% reduction in pyrrhotite with 14 units loss in Ni recovery and 7 units loss in Cu recovery. The loss in Ni recovery in this circuit is to be expected since a significant amount of Ni is actually in solid solution with pyrrhotite, and this bound nickel will be depressed if pyrrhotite is depressed. An appropriate indicator of selectivity between free nickel and pyrrhotite is the index I in Table VI. The index I is 1.1 in the absence of any depressant. Upon addition of the depressant, the ratio remains unaltered thereby indicating that with respect to pyrrhotite in the tails, no additional free nickel is lost. In other words, the polymer indeed provides selective depression of pyrrhotite.
                                  TABLE VI                                
__________________________________________________________________________
Cu--Ni--Pyrrhotite Feed                                                   
Scavenger Circuit: 0.46% Cu, 1% Ni, 21.8% S,                              
52% Pyrrhotite (Po)                                                       
              Cu       Ni       Po                                        
Ex. Depressant                                                            
           g/t                                                            
              Rec Grade                                                   
                       Rec Grade                                          
                                Rec Grade                                 
                                         I*                               
__________________________________________________________________________
K   None      89.0                                                        
                  1.7  63.0                                               
                           2.5  36.0                                      
                                    76.0 1.1                              
46  Polymer of                                                            
           50 82.0                                                        
                  2.7  49.0                                               
                           3.5  16.0                                      
                                    64.0 1.1                              
    Example 1                                                             
__________________________________________________________________________
 ##STR4##                                                                 
 Any depressant used should preferably maintain an I value equal to or    
 lower than that in the control test, i.e., Example K.
EXAMPLE 47
The procedure as set forth in Example 46 is followed in this example except that a new feed which is much higher in Po is used and a different batch of the depressant polymer is used. The results given in Table VII demonstrate that the polymer provides a selective depression of pyrrhotite (the recovery decreases from 50.5% in the absence of depressant to 33% at 56 g/t of depressant; a reduction of 35%). The copper loss is only 2.8 units and the Ni loss is about 11 units. The I value is even slightly lower than that in the control test indicating that the depressant is indeed selective.
                                  TABLE VII                               
__________________________________________________________________________
Scavenger Circuit: 0.40% Cu, 1% Ni, 60% Po,                               
              Cu     Ni     Po                                            
Ex.                                                                       
   Depressant                                                             
            g/t                                                           
              Rec                                                         
                 Grade                                                    
                     Rec                                                  
                        Grade                                             
                            Rec                                           
                               Grade                                      
                                   I                                      
__________________________________________________________________________
L  None       83.9                                                        
                 0.74                                                     
                     71.8                                                 
                        1.67                                              
                            50.5                                          
                               80.0                                       
                                   1.04                                   
47 Polymer of Ex-2                                                        
            56                                                            
              81.1                                                        
                 1.38                                                     
                     60.4                                                 
                        2.44                                              
                            33.0                                          
                               77.0                                       
                                   1.03                                   
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 48
The effect of aging and aeration of the pulp on the depressant activity of the polymers of the present invention is tested using essentially the procedure set forth in Example 46, except that the pulp is agitated (open to atmosphere) in a flotation cell for 30 minutes (including 2 minutes aeration in between) prior to addition of the polymer. The results given in Table VII demonstrate that the depressant activity is maintained or even increased for the aged and aerated pulp, and that the polymer is able to depress even aged and oxidized Po quite effectively.
                                  TABLE VIII                              
__________________________________________________________________________
               Cu     Ni     Po                                           
Ex.                                                                       
   Depressant                                                             
            g/t                                                           
               Rec                                                        
                  Grade                                                   
                      Rec                                                 
                         Grade                                            
                             Rec                                          
                                Grade                                     
                                    I                                     
__________________________________________________________________________
M  None        86.5                                                       
                  1.15                                                    
                      68.2                                                
                         2.05                                             
                             44.8                                         
                                78.0                                      
                                    0.99                                  
N  None        85.6                                                       
                  1.25                                                    
                      65.0                                                
                         2.07                                             
                             41.0                                         
                                77.8                                      
                                    1.00                                  
48 Polymer of Ex-1                                                        
            78.0                                                          
               81.8                                                       
                  2.25                                                    
                      52.5                                                
                         3.11                                             
                             19.7                                         
                                67.3                                      
                                    1.03                                  
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 49
The procedure as described in Example 46 is followed, but the feed containing 1.5% Cu, 2.4% Ni and 35% Po is from a different mill. The pyrrhotite in this feed floats quite excessively and it is very difficult to depress. The objectives here are once again to reject as much Po as possible in the process of recovering Ni. Also a larger fraction of the Po contains the valuable Ni in intimate association or solid solution. Consequently, with the depression of Po, some Ni losses are inevitable. The results are set forth in Table IX.
                                  TABLE IX                                
__________________________________________________________________________
               Cu     Ni     Po                                           
Ex.                                                                       
   Depressant                                                             
            g/t                                                           
               Rec                                                        
                  Grade                                                   
                      Rec                                                 
                         Grade                                            
                             Rec Grade                                    
__________________________________________________________________________
0  None        91.6                                                       
                  3.25                                                    
                      87.2                                                
                         4.98                                             
                             75.8                                         
                                 64.8                                     
49 Polymer of Ex-2                                                        
            190                                                           
               70.0                                                       
                  5.65                                                    
                      64.7                                                
                         8.43                                             
                             21.9                                         
                                 44.1                                     
__________________________________________________________________________
These results demonstrate that even on this difficult feed, the use of the novel polymer of the present invention at 190 g/t results in 71% reduction in Po reporting to the concentrate, the grade of the Ni concentrate increases from 5% to 8.4% Ni and the associated loss in Ni is about 25%, which is to be expected considering the intimate association of some Ni with Po. Furthermore, by carefully adjusting the dosage of the polymer and by stage addition, the loss of Ni can be minimized.
EXAMPLE 50
Following the procedure as described in Example 46, the effectiveness of the novel depressants of this invention are evaluated on a feed from yet another mill. This feed contains 0.64% Cu, 1.9% Ni, and 47% Po, has a siqnificant proportion of magnetic Po which floats quite readily and is hard to depress. The results are given in Table X.
                                  TABLE X                                 
__________________________________________________________________________
               Cu     Ni     Po                                           
Ex.                                                                       
   Depressant                                                             
            g/t                                                           
               Rec                                                        
                  Grade                                                   
                      Rec                                                 
                         Grade                                            
                             Rec Grade                                    
__________________________________________________________________________
P  None     -- 79.0                                                       
                  0.84                                                    
                      87.5                                                
                         2.86                                             
                             92.5                                         
                                 73.1                                     
50 Polymer of Ex-2                                                        
            290                                                           
               62.5                                                       
                  1.04                                                    
                      69.1                                                
                         3.44                                             
                             50.9                                         
                                 63.7                                     
__________________________________________________________________________
These results demonstrate clearly that the novel polymer is able to depress Po quite effectively. A reduction in Po flotation of 55% is realized with the use of about 290 g/t of the polymer. The loss in Ni recovery is about 18% units or about 21% of the total Ni. This loss can once again be attributed to Ni associated with Po either as a fine dissemination in Po or as a solid solution. The grade of Po in the Ni concentrate is reduced from 73.1 (in the absence of depressant) to 63.7% Po in presence of depressant. This is a significant reduction in Po reporting to the Ni and Cu smelters and results in the reduction of SO2 emissions.
EXAMPLE 51
In this example, a massive complex sulfide ore containing Zn, Cu and Fe sulfides is ground to about 45%-200m, conditioned with H2 SO4 and ethyl xanthate and a frother, floated at acid pH (4-7) to obtain a bulk sulfide concentrate which is cleaned, reground with lime (85%-200M) and conditioned with sodium silicate and sodium cyanide at pH 10.5-10.8. Thus conditioned pulp is floated to recover as much copper selectively as possible, rejecting both iron and zinc sulfides. It can be readily seen that the polymer of the present invention provides satisfactory performance at reduced lime dosage which is desirable in this plant. It gives better iron and zinc rejection, although at a higher dosage. The results are set forth in Table XI, below.
              TABLE XI                                                    
______________________________________                                    
Cu--Pyrrhotite - Zn ore                                                   
Feed: Cu 0.5-0.7%; Zn--0.9%; Fe--33%; S--18%                              
                             Lime Cu   Fe   Zn                            
Example                                                                   
       Depressant    g/t     kg/t Rec. Rec. Rec.                          
______________________________________                                    
Q      Std. Cyanide  54      5.2  78.0 14.6 23.0                          
R      Std. Cyanide  40      6.3  95.8 20.7 38.0                          
51     polymer of Ex.-1                                                   
                     107     1.34 85.0 18.5 30.8                          
______________________________________
EXAMPLE 52
In this example, another complex sulfide ore is used. The pulp, containing approximately 1800 parts of dry solids, is collected directly from the plant zinc circuit and is conditioned for 1 min. with lime to give a pH of 11.0 followed by conditioning for 2 min. with the depressant. The pulp is then conditioned with copper sulfate to activate sphalerite, sodium isobutyl xanthate collector and a polypropylene glycol frother. Thus conditioned pulp is floated in several stages to collect timed concentrates. The results are given in Table XII, below.
The objective here is to reduce the amount of Pb and Cu reporting to the zinc concentrate and to produce a high grade zinc concentrate. It is evident from the results that the use of the polymer of the present invention increased the grade of zinc in the concentrate from 31.5% Zn to 36.3% while decreasing Cu and Pb recoveries.
                                  TABLE XII                               
__________________________________________________________________________
Cu--Zn--Pb--Ag--Pyrite Ore                                                
Feed: Zinc Circuit, 6.8% Zn, 0.1% Cu, 0.28% Pb,                           
CuSO.sub.4 750 g/t                                                        
                 Zn     Cu     Pb                                         
Example                                                                   
     Depressant                                                           
              g/t                                                         
                 Rec                                                      
                    Grade                                                 
                        Rec                                               
                           Grade                                          
                               Rec                                        
                                  Grade                                   
__________________________________________________________________________
S    None     -- 92.5                                                     
                    31.5                                                  
                        36.9                                              
                           0.17                                           
                               40.1                                       
                                  0.57                                    
52   Polymer of Ex-1                                                      
              56.0                                                        
                 87.3                                                     
                    36.3                                                  
                        27.7                                              
                           0.17                                           
                               30.1                                       
                                  0.51                                    
__________________________________________________________________________
EXAMPLE 52
A complex Pb-Zn-Fe-ore is used for these examples. 500 Parts of the as-received -10 mesh ore are ground in a ball mill for 20 min. at 60% solids with lime to provide the desired pH. The ground pulp is conditioned for 2 min. with sodium isobutyl xanthate, a commercially available dithiophosphate collector and the depressant employed. Rougher and scavenger flotation is then carried out for 2 and 4 minutes respectively, and the products are assayed for Pb, Zn and Fe.
The objective here is to recover as much Pb as possible with rejection of Zn and especially Fe (as iron sulfides).
The results are set forth in Table XIII.
                                  TABLE XIII                              
__________________________________________________________________________
                 % Recovery                                               
Example     Dosage                                                        
                 Rougher  Scavenger                                       
                                   Overall                                
No.  Depressant                                                           
            g/t  Pb Zn Fe Pb Zn Fe Pb Zn Fe                               
__________________________________________________________________________
            (pH 8.0)                                                      
T    Lime   1714 70.9                                                     
                    11.8                                                  
                       27.6                                               
                          16.6                                            
                             18.2                                         
                                45.3                                      
                                   87.5                                   
                                      30.0                                
                                         72.9                             
     Zinc Sulfate                                                         
            750                                                           
52   Polymer of                                                           
            400  62.3                                                     
                    8.1                                                   
                       9.6                                                
                          20.9                                            
                             19.2                                         
                                29.8                                      
                                   83.2                                   
                                      27.3                                
                                         d39.4                            
     Example 26                                                           
            (pH 8.0)                                                      
53   Polymer of                                                           
            200+ 69.5                                                     
                    19.5                                                  
                       21.2                                               
                          13.8                                            
                             12.2                                         
                                12.7                                      
                                   83.3                                   
                                      31.7                                
                                         33.9                             
     Example 26                                                           
            200                                                           
54   Polymer of                                                           
            400  67.1                                                     
                    11.5                                                  
                       10.5                                               
                          11.9                                            
                             9.0                                          
                                8.6                                       
                                   79.0                                   
                                      21.0                                
                                         19.1                             
     Example 7                                                            
55   Polymer of                                                           
            200  52.0                                                     
                    8.4                                                   
                       5.3                                                
                          15.0                                            
                             8.0                                          
                                7.9                                       
                                   67.0                                   
                                      16.4                                
                                         13.2                             
     Example 1                                                            
            (to scav.)                                                    
     (50K M.W.)                                                           
56   Polymer of                                                           
            200  56.3                                                     
                    9.0                                                   
                       6.2                                                
                          10.7                                            
                             8.5                                          
                                7.9                                       
                                   67.0                                   
                                      17.5                                
                                         14.1                             
     Example 2                                                            
            (to scav.)                                                    
     (300K M.W.)                                                          
57   Polymer of                                                           
            200  51.3                                                     
                    8.1                                                   
                       5.4                                                
                          15.2                                            
                             8.9                                          
                                9.5                                       
                                   66.5                                   
                                      17.0                                
                                         14.9                             
     Example 24                                                           
            (to scav.)                                                    
__________________________________________________________________________
 AA = acrylic acid; AMD = acrylamide
These results demonstrate clearly the excellent selectivity of the novel polymers of the present invention against iron sulfides gangue. When using zinc sulfate, in conjunction with lime, as the depressant at 750 g/t, iron recovery (in the form of iron sulfides gangue) is about 73% which is too high for the lead smelter. With the use of the acryl-amide-allyl droxy ethyl thiourea copolymer at only 400 g/t, the iron recovery is reduced from 73% to 39% (Example 52); zinc recovery is slightly lower (27% vs 30%) and lead loss is merely 4 units which can be either tolerated or recovered in another flotation operation using selective reactivation with a xanthat or dithiophosphate collector. When the depressant in Example 52 is split equally between rougher and scavenger 200+200 g/t (Example 53) there is further reduction in iron recovery from 39% to 34%. With the use of an acrylmide-allyl methyl thiourea copolymer, the iron recovery is only 19% compared with the 73% obtained with zinc sulfate (see Example 54.)
In the case of the acrylamide-allyl thiourea copolymer, 400 g/t is too high. The dosage is, therefore, reduced to 200 g/t (Example 55). With the polymer of M.W. 50,000, at 200 g/t, the iron recovery is only 13% (vs. 73% for zinc sulfate). The lead recovery is low (67%), but this can be improved by further decreasing the depressant dosage or by selective reactivation - flotation. The zinc recovery is also substantially reduced (16% vs. 30% for zinc sulfate) which is an added benefit.
Substantially the same results are obtained with a polymer of MW 300,000 instead of 50,000 (compare Example 55 and 56), thereby indicating that MW does not have an effect on the depressant activity at the levels tested.
Example 57 demonstrates that the polymer's depressant activity is maintained even upon introduction of acrylic acid units in the polymer. The acrylic acid group's carboxyl functionality provides additional hydrophilic character to the polymer without affecting the depressant activity which is attributable to the thiourea functionality.
Replacement of the thiourea copolymers of the previous examples with any of those copolymers prepared in Examples 1-31 results in equivalent depressant activity.

Claims (5)

We claim:
1. A method for the beneficiation of value sulfide minerals, from a sulfide ore containing said value sulfide minerals and a second sulfide mineral with selective separation of value sulfide minerals from said second mineral which comprises:
(a) providing an aqueous pulp slurry of finely-divided, liberated ore particles;
(b) conditioning said pulp slurry with an amount of a synthetic depressant effective to depress said second mineral, a value sulfide minerals collector and a frothing agent, respectively, said depressant comprising a polymer comprising:
(i) x units of the formula: ##STR5## (ii) y units of the formula: ##STR6## (iii) z units of the formula: ##STR7## wherein each of R, R1 and R2, is, individually, hydrogen or a C1 -C4 alkyl group, R3 is hydrogen, a C1-C 4 alkyl group or aryl, R4 and R5 are, individually, hydrogen a C1 -C4 hydrocarbon group or an aryl group and Z represents the polymerization residue of a mononer selected from the group consisting of acrylonitrile, styrene, a cationic, or acrylic, metacrylic or maleic acid or alkali metal salts or alkyl estes of said acids; X represents a residual mole percent fraction; y is a mole percent fraction ranging from about 1.0% to about 50.0%, by weight, based on the total weight of x, y, and z; z is a mole percent fraction ranging from about 0% to about 50.0%, by weight, same basis, and the molecular weight of said polymer is between about 1000 and about 1,000,000; and
2. A method according to claim 1 wherein each of R, R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5 is hydrogen.
3. A method according to claim 1 wherein at least one of R, R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5 is a C1-C 4 alkyl groups.
4. A method according to claim 1 wherein the depressant contains or is used in combination with, a surface-modifying agent.
5. A method according to claim 4 wherein said surface-modifying agent is NaHS, NaCN, Nokes reagent, mercapto ethanol, thioglycolic acid, sodium and potassium ferrocyanides and ferricyanides, hydroxyethyltrithiocarbonates, carboxyethyl trithiocarbonates, sodium trithiocarbonates, hydrogen peroxide, ozone, air oxygen, sulfur dioxide, zinc cyanide, calcium cyanide, arsenic Nokes, mercapto propionic acid, mercapto succinic acid, 2-thiouracil or thioglycerol.
US07/363,235 1988-04-18 1989-06-08 Method of using polymeric sulfide mineral depressants Expired - Lifetime US4888106A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US07/363,235 US4888106A (en) 1988-04-18 1989-06-08 Method of using polymeric sulfide mineral depressants

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US07/182,681 US4866150A (en) 1988-04-18 1988-04-18 Polymeric sulfide mineral depressants
US07/363,235 US4888106A (en) 1988-04-18 1989-06-08 Method of using polymeric sulfide mineral depressants

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/182,681 Division US4866150A (en) 1988-04-18 1988-04-18 Polymeric sulfide mineral depressants

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US4888106A true US4888106A (en) 1989-12-19

Family

ID=26878306

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US07/363,235 Expired - Lifetime US4888106A (en) 1988-04-18 1989-06-08 Method of using polymeric sulfide mineral depressants

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US4888106A (en)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5756622A (en) * 1996-03-28 1998-05-26 Cytec Technology Corp. Polymeric sulfide mineral depressants
EP0994133A2 (en) * 1998-10-13 2000-04-19 Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd. Method for raising cloud point polymer
WO2013038192A1 (en) * 2011-09-13 2013-03-21 Novel Polymer Solutions Limited Mineral processing using a polymeric material that includes a moiety which selectively binds to a mineral
US9302270B2 (en) 2011-05-25 2016-04-05 Cidra Corporate Services Inc. Mineral separation using functionalized filters and membranes
US9731221B2 (en) 2011-05-25 2017-08-15 Cidra Corporate Services, Inc. Apparatus having polymer surfaces having a siloxane functional group
WO2018067919A1 (en) 2016-10-07 2018-04-12 Cytec Industries Inc. Depressant compositions and methods for depressing the gangue sulfide minerals during the flotation of sulfide ores
WO2022177872A1 (en) 2021-02-17 2022-08-25 Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. Dithiocarbamate depressants, methods and uses thereof in froth flotation mineral separation
CN117772423A (en) * 2024-02-27 2024-03-29 矿冶科技集团有限公司 Copper-sulfur flotation separation combined inhibitor and method for copper-sulfur flotation by using same under lime-free condition

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3671492A (en) * 1965-07-22 1972-06-20 Sumitomo Chemical Co 1:1 alternating copolymers of carbonyl or thiocarbonyl-containing non-conjugated compounds and conjugated compounds and method of preparation
US3700648A (en) * 1968-09-30 1972-10-24 Sumitomo Chemical Co Method for producing alternating copolymers
US4139455A (en) * 1974-11-19 1979-02-13 Allied Colloids Limited Materials and processes for flotation of mineral substances
US4256227A (en) * 1979-04-23 1981-03-17 Vojislav Petrovich Froth flotation method for recovering metal values from their ores by thiourea or substituted thiourea
US4289613A (en) * 1979-11-19 1981-09-15 American Cyanamid Company Low molecular weight hydrolyzed polymers or copolymers as depressants in mineral ore flotation
US4360425A (en) * 1981-09-14 1982-11-23 American Cyanamid Company Low molecular weight copolymers and terpolymers as depressants in mineral ore flotation
US4720339A (en) * 1985-03-15 1988-01-19 American Cyanamid Company Flotation beneficiation process for non-sulfide minerals
US4744893A (en) * 1985-08-28 1988-05-17 American Cyanamid Company Polymeric sulfide mineral depressants

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3671492A (en) * 1965-07-22 1972-06-20 Sumitomo Chemical Co 1:1 alternating copolymers of carbonyl or thiocarbonyl-containing non-conjugated compounds and conjugated compounds and method of preparation
US3700648A (en) * 1968-09-30 1972-10-24 Sumitomo Chemical Co Method for producing alternating copolymers
US4139455A (en) * 1974-11-19 1979-02-13 Allied Colloids Limited Materials and processes for flotation of mineral substances
US4256227A (en) * 1979-04-23 1981-03-17 Vojislav Petrovich Froth flotation method for recovering metal values from their ores by thiourea or substituted thiourea
US4289613A (en) * 1979-11-19 1981-09-15 American Cyanamid Company Low molecular weight hydrolyzed polymers or copolymers as depressants in mineral ore flotation
US4360425A (en) * 1981-09-14 1982-11-23 American Cyanamid Company Low molecular weight copolymers and terpolymers as depressants in mineral ore flotation
US4720339A (en) * 1985-03-15 1988-01-19 American Cyanamid Company Flotation beneficiation process for non-sulfide minerals
US4744893A (en) * 1985-08-28 1988-05-17 American Cyanamid Company Polymeric sulfide mineral depressants

Cited By (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5756622A (en) * 1996-03-28 1998-05-26 Cytec Technology Corp. Polymeric sulfide mineral depressants
US5959054A (en) * 1996-03-28 1999-09-28 Cytec Technology Corp. Polymeric sulfide mineral depressants
EP0994133A2 (en) * 1998-10-13 2000-04-19 Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd. Method for raising cloud point polymer
EP0994133A3 (en) * 1998-10-13 2000-10-18 Nippon Shokubai Co., Ltd. Method for raising cloud point polymer
US9352335B2 (en) 2011-05-25 2016-05-31 Cidra Corporate Services Inc. Synthetic beads/bubbles functionalized with molecules for attracting and attaching to mineral particles of interest
US11135597B2 (en) 2011-05-25 2021-10-05 Cidra Corporate Services Llc Method and system for releasing mineral from synthetic bubbles and beads
US9302270B2 (en) 2011-05-25 2016-04-05 Cidra Corporate Services Inc. Mineral separation using functionalized filters and membranes
US9327294B2 (en) 2011-05-25 2016-05-03 Cidra Corporate Services Inc. Synthetic bubbles or beads having hydrophobic surface
US9981271B2 (en) 2011-05-25 2018-05-29 Cidra Corporate Services Llc Method and system for releasing mineral from synthetic bubbles and beads
US11117141B2 (en) 2011-05-25 2021-09-14 Cidra Corporate Services Inc. Mineral separation using sized-, weight- or magnetic-based polymer bubbles or beads
US11731143B2 (en) 2011-05-25 2023-08-22 Cidra Corporate Services Inc. Mineral separation using functionalized membranes
US10357782B2 (en) 2011-05-25 2019-07-23 Cidra Corporate Services Llc Flotation separation using lightweight synthetic beads or bubbles
US9731221B2 (en) 2011-05-25 2017-08-15 Cidra Corporate Services, Inc. Apparatus having polymer surfaces having a siloxane functional group
US9827574B2 (en) 2011-05-25 2017-11-28 Cidra Corporate Services, Inc. Mineral separation using sized-, weight- or magnetic-based polymer bubbles or beads
US9981272B2 (en) 2011-05-25 2018-05-29 Cidra Corporate Services, Inc. Techniques for transporting synthetic beads or bubbles in a flotation cell or column
US9943860B2 (en) 2011-05-25 2018-04-17 Cidra Corporate Services Inc. Mineral recovery in tailings using functionalized polymers
US10603676B2 (en) 2011-09-13 2020-03-31 Cidra Minerals Processing Inc. Mineral processing
CN103930213A (en) * 2011-09-13 2014-07-16 喜德矿物加工有限公司 Mineral processing using a polymeric material that includes a moiety which selectively binds to a mineral
WO2013038192A1 (en) * 2011-09-13 2013-03-21 Novel Polymer Solutions Limited Mineral processing using a polymeric material that includes a moiety which selectively binds to a mineral
RU2615990C2 (en) * 2011-09-13 2017-04-12 СиДРА МИНЕРАЛС ПРОЦЕССИНГ ИНК. Mineral processing using polymeric material including moiety selectively binding to mineral
US11654443B2 (en) 2011-09-13 2023-05-23 Cidra Minerals Processing Inc. Mineral processing
AU2012308156B2 (en) * 2011-09-13 2016-11-17 CiDRA Minerals Processing Inc., Mineral processing using a polymeric material that includes a moiety which selectively binds to a mineral
CN103930213B (en) * 2011-09-13 2016-11-09 喜德矿物加工有限公司 Use the mineral processing including that the polymeric material of the part being selectively bound on mineral is carried out
US10369577B2 (en) * 2016-10-07 2019-08-06 Cytec Industries Inc. Compositions and methods for selective separation of minerals from sulfide ores
EA039011B1 (en) * 2016-10-07 2021-11-22 Сайтек Индастриз Инк. Depressant compositions and methods for depressing the gangue sulfide minerals during the flotation of sulfide ores
CN110035829B (en) * 2016-10-07 2021-12-24 塞特工业公司 Depressant composition and method for depressing gangue sulfide minerals during flotation of sulfide ores
WO2018067919A1 (en) 2016-10-07 2018-04-12 Cytec Industries Inc. Depressant compositions and methods for depressing the gangue sulfide minerals during the flotation of sulfide ores
CN110035829A (en) * 2016-10-07 2019-07-19 塞特工业公司 Inhibitor combination and for during the flotation of sulfide ore inhibit gangue sulphide mineral method
WO2022177872A1 (en) 2021-02-17 2022-08-25 Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc. Dithiocarbamate depressants, methods and uses thereof in froth flotation mineral separation
CN117772423A (en) * 2024-02-27 2024-03-29 矿冶科技集团有限公司 Copper-sulfur flotation separation combined inhibitor and method for copper-sulfur flotation by using same under lime-free condition
CN117772423B (en) * 2024-02-27 2024-05-31 矿冶科技集团有限公司 Copper-sulfur flotation separation combined inhibitor and method for copper-sulfur flotation by using same under lime-free condition

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4866150A (en) Polymeric sulfide mineral depressants
EP0889917B1 (en) Novel polymeric sulfide mineral depressants
US4744893A (en) Polymeric sulfide mineral depressants
US4902764A (en) Polymeric sulfide mineral depressants
US5074994A (en) Sequential and selective flotation of sulfide ores
CA1335466C (en) Polymeric sulfide mineral depressants
US5049612A (en) Depressant for flotation separation of polymetallic sulphidic ores
US4888106A (en) Method of using polymeric sulfide mineral depressants
CA1172777A (en) Flotation collections and ore dressing methods in which the collectors are employed
US4966938A (en) Allyl thiourea polymer with surface-modifying agent
US5693692A (en) Depressant for flotation separation of polymetallic sulphide ores
DE69609507T2 (en) METHOD FOR PRESSING NON-SULFIDIC SILICATIC GANGES
US5507395A (en) Method of depressing non-sulfide silicate gangue minerals
US5531330A (en) Method of depressing non-sulfide silicate gangue minerals
US4220525A (en) Beneficiation of metallic ores by froth flotation using polyhydroxy amine depressants
US4159943A (en) Froth flotation of ores using hydrocarbyl bicarbonates
EP0830209B1 (en) Method of depressing non-sulfide silicate gangue minerals
MXPA98007755A (en) Depressive reagents of polymeric sulfide novedo minerals
CN113929820A (en) Sulfide ore inhibitor and preparation method and use method thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: PAYOR NUMBER ASSIGNED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: ASPN); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 12