Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

US3839187A - Removing metal contaminants from petroleum residual oil - Google Patents

Removing metal contaminants from petroleum residual oil Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3839187A
US3839187A US00303152A US30315272A US3839187A US 3839187 A US3839187 A US 3839187A US 00303152 A US00303152 A US 00303152A US 30315272 A US30315272 A US 30315272A US 3839187 A US3839187 A US 3839187A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
scrubbing agent
residual oil
hydrogen donor
petroleum
residual
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US00303152A
Inventor
J Vanvenrooy
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sunoco Inc
Original Assignee
Sun Oil Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sun Oil Co filed Critical Sun Oil Co
Priority to US00303152A priority Critical patent/US3839187A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3839187A publication Critical patent/US3839187A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G45/00Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds
    • C10G45/02Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing
    • C10G45/24Refining of hydrocarbon oils using hydrogen or hydrogen-generating compounds to eliminate hetero atoms without changing the skeleton of the hydrocarbon involved and without cracking into lower boiling hydrocarbons; Hydrofinishing with hydrogen-generating compounds
    • C10G45/28Organic compounds; Autofining
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G47/00Cracking of hydrocarbon oils, in the presence of hydrogen or hydrogen- generating compounds, to obtain lower boiling fractions

Definitions

  • the residual stock itself cannot be economically directly cracked due to the presence of substantial portions of metal contaminants, particularly nickel and vanadium components.
  • metal contaminants particularly nickel and vanadium components.
  • These metals which may be present in quantities of from about to 50 pounds of metal per 1,000 barrels of crude, deposit on the catalyst during the conversion in such a fashion that regeneration of the catalyst is extremely difficult. Further, the cracking operation of the stream itself is adversely affected since the contaminants deposited decrease the catalyst activity, and cause excessive coke to be formed during the catalytic cracking, with a resulting loss in hydrocarbon product.
  • a refining method referred to as hydrogen donor diluent processing has been developed.
  • a hydrogen donor such as hydrocrackate bottoms containing at least in part partially hydrogenated polycyclic aromatic compounds
  • a crude residual oil during thermal cracking, generally in the temperature range of 700-1,000F.
  • No catalyst is used in the hydrogen donor process and hence, the problem of catalyst fouling is at least initially alleviated.
  • This process and the use of hydrocrackate bottoms is best exemplified by U.S. Pat. No. 3,238,118 of William Floyd Arey. Jr. and Ralph Burgess Mason, Issued Mar. 1, 1966.
  • metal as herein employed refers to those metals which are chemically bound to the high boiling molecular structures that make up the residual portion of a crude oil e.g., Ni or V bound in a porphyrin structure.
  • Another problem inherent in prior art processes is the coking that occurs during treatment of the residual oils and such coking both degrades the oil and makes further processing difficult.
  • Associated with the coking phenomenon is the consumption of hydrogen with formation of increased quantities of methane and this, too, is undesirable in that it reflects loss of hydrocarbon and makes for an inefficient process.
  • the distillate materials produced by this system are highly purified and are therefore quite suitable for conversion into petroleum products.
  • a metals-contaminated petroleum residual stream can be upgraded without significant coking, by subjecting the residual stream to a hydrogen donor diluent process in the presence of a porous, high surface, inorganic scrubbing agent, separating the metal containing inorganic material and regenerating and recycling it for reuse.
  • the process is particularly suitable for those highly contaminated streams containing greater than 500 ppm. of metals, particularly where the metals are nickel and vanadium.
  • the demetallization step of this process may be carried out in a slurry type of operation or in an ebullated bed but preferably in a slurry operation.
  • the residual streams can first be subjected to the hydrogen donor diluent process and then contacted with a scrubbing agent, but the preferred operation and that which secures superior results is when the processes are carried out together. It should be noted that satisfactory results are not obtained when the residual stream is first contacted with a scrubbing agent and then subjected to the hydrogen donor process.
  • the hydrogen donor, porous scrubbing agent deme tallization step is carried out at temperatures of incipient coking which is usually in the range of from at least about 750F. to 1,000F. and at a pressure in the range of from about 500 to 5,000 psig.
  • the hydrogen donor to residual oil ratio will generally be from about 0.1 to 10.
  • the preferred conditions consist of a temperature in the range of from about 750 to about 875F., a hydrogen pressure in the range of from about 1,000 to about 3,000 psig, and a hydrogen donor to residual oil weight ratio of from about 0.25 to about 2.5, and the conversion is generally carried out for a period of from 5 minutes to 3 hours.
  • the ratio of hydrogen donor to resid is not critical with respect to metals removal, but in order to minimize carbon build-up it is preferable to operate the process at a donor to resid weight ratio of about 1. This will depend on hydrogen donor ability of the solvent and the activity of the regenerated recycled porous scrubbing agent.
  • the hydrogen donor can be any such material well-known in the art such as hydrocrackate bottoms or other refinery stream containing partially hydrogenated polycyclic aromatics compounds, with the preferred donor being hydrocrackate bottoms.
  • the highly porous inorganic scrubbing agent can be any porous, high surface area, inorganic adsorbent material such as alumina silicates.
  • the pore size of the material should be large enough to accept the metals as their sulfides, and generally it should have a minimum pore size of at least 30 A but preferably may possess a broad range of pore size distribution to facilitate entry and accumulation of the metallic components deposited from the contaminated residual oil.
  • the materials surface area should generally be at least 50 sq. M/gm. measured by nitrogen adsorption but preferably will have a surface area of 100 to 250 sq. M/gm. Examples of suitable agents are montmorillonite, beidellite, kaolinite, etc.
  • Activated alumina and activated bauxite possessing high surface area are also highly suitable as scrubbing agents for use in this invention.
  • the scrubbing agent serves a dual purpose. Besides its major function of removing metal contaminants, the material also functions as a site for the deposition of any coke that might be formed and also provides a scouring action on the walls of the process equipment.
  • the amount of scrubbing agent generally used in the system will be from about 3 to about 15 weight percent based on the charge to the reactor. The quantity of scrubbing agent charged depends on the coking tendency of the residual oil, residence time, H pressure, and amount of Ni and V accumulated from previous exposures to metalliferous residual oils.
  • a general mode of carrying out the instant invention when employing hydrocrackate bottoms as the hydrogen donor is exemplified in the drawing as follows: A whole crude petroleum oil which has been subjected to atmospheric distillation to remove light material or other feed such as heavy athabascan tar oil is separated in a vacuum tower into fractions including therein a gas oil fraction (11) boiling from about 500F. up to about l,0OOF. and a bottoms or residual stream (12) boiling above about the end point of the gas oil stream and this residual stream is ultimately subjected to the combined hydrogen donor diluent-porous scrubbing agent process of this invention which occurs in the demetallizer (13).
  • the separated gas oil fraction is fed from the vacuum tower (10) to a hydrotreating reactor (26) and then to a hydrocracking reactor (14) where hydrocracking occurs in the presence of a hydrocracking catalyst under conditions well known in the art.
  • the feed is generally subjected to temperatures in the range of from 550 to 850F. at a pressure of from 500 to 2,500 p.s.i.g.
  • Suit able catalysts for hydrotreating include the well known alumina supported cobalt-molybdenum and nickelmolybdenum catalysts.
  • the hydrocracking catalyst may be any suitable hydrocracking catalyst, such as nickel sulfide on silica-alumina, a noble metal such as platinum or palladium on a molecular sieve base having uniform pore openings between about 6 and 15 angstrom units, noble metal on silica-alumina, and various catalysts comprising Group VI and VIII metals, oxides and sulfides on suitable supports such as silica-alumina,
  • a hydrogen stream (15) is also introduced into the hydrotreater.
  • the products are withdrawn, cooled and passed into a separator (16) wherein hydrogen-containing gas is separated from the liquid. This gas can then be recycled into the hydrotreating zone.
  • the liquid product then passes into a fractionator (17) where several light fractions are separated leaving a hydrocrackate bottoms (18) which will be used as the hydrogen donor in the process of the invention.
  • the bottoms In order for the bottoms to be successfully employed as such, it will have a boiling point above about 430F. and have more than about 20 percent by volume of condensed ring naphthenes.
  • the hydrocracking reaction should be carried out at pressure greater than 800 psig and temperatures less than 800F. Further, since the naphthene content of the bottoms varies with the conversion, the feed rate should be such as to limit conversion to less than percent.
  • the hydrocrackate bottoms are combined with the residual or crude oil bottoms stream (12) from'the vacuum tower (10) in desired proportions, heated, and passed to a thermal demetallizing zone, such as a tube furnace reactor, (13) wherein the scrubbing agent (19) is introduced.
  • the scrubbing agent introduced is a mixture of mainly regenerated, recycled material .plus some fresh make-up material.
  • the aforementioned temperature and pressure conditions are maintained in the zone.
  • the recycled scrubbing agent containing Ni and V previously deposited provides sufficient catalytic activity to minimize coke formation.
  • hydrogen exchange occurs between the residual oil and the hydrocrackate bottoms by the release of hydrogen from the donor to produce lower boiling hydrocarbons, and thermal cracking occurs within the zone.
  • Hydrogen is also adsorbed from the gas phase due to the activity of the recycled scrubbing agent. Also, a substantial amount of metals present in the residual stream are accumulated on the scrubbing agent, as is some coke formed during the conversion, thus allowing for the easy removal and recovery of the metals. Electromicroprobe analysis of the scrubbing agent reveals that the nickel and vanadium from the contaminated oil has permeated into the porous interior of the scrubbing agent.
  • the product is removed from the reactor and is then further processed for the recovery of petroleum fractions in a gas-solid slurry separator (20) and a liquid-solid separator (21).
  • the liquid reactor products are separated in a fractionator (25) to yield low boiling hydrocarbons, naphtha and gas oil.
  • the gas oil and similar products fromthe fractionator (25) are also fed to the hydrotreater (26) and then to the hydrocracker (14).
  • the scrubbing agent used for the acculation of the metallic contaminants is separated by filtration or centrifuging in the liquid-solid separator (21) and spent scrubbing agent (22) regenerated in the regenerator (23) and recycled to the demetallizer-reactor (13). Part of the scrubbing agent may be processed to recover the deposited metals (24).
  • the regeneration step simply involves burning off any coke from the used agent, but leaving the metals in the pores.
  • it is important that a major part of the spent scrubbing agent containing the metals removed from the resid will be returned directly to-the demetallizer since the metalcontaining scrubbing agent, surprisingly, results in improved metals pick-up and by means of this recycle system minimizes coke formation during the demetallizing step.
  • Example 1 to 3 The process details described above were followed using a Kunststoffulean Lagomedio resid and a hydrogen and contains 16.1 percent asphaltenes.
  • the scrubbing agent used was an attapulgus clay having a 100 mesh particle size and was regenerated for recycle by burning off any deposited carbon at 875F.
  • the following table indicates the conditions of the various runs and it was used under recycle conditions (compare Example 2 without scrubbing agent with Example 3).
  • the total of Ramsbottom carbon of the liquid product and recovered carbon (6.0lg) in Example 3 was significantly less than Examples 1 and 2 where the process of the invention was not in effect. It is also of interest that the amount of methane in the off-gases from Example 3 were lower than in Examples 1 and 2 and the sulfur content of the processed resid was also significantly reduced.
  • Examples 4 and 5 In a second set of runs shown in Table 11, preferred and severe conditions were used to illustrate the kind of conditions needed in a short contact time tube furnace reactor.
  • the fed was a Venezuelan Lagomedio resid and a hydrogen donor solvent which was dewaxed hydrocrackate lube oil boiling above 650F.
  • the scrubbing agent used was recycled bauxite in Example 4 and fresh bauxite in Example 5.
  • gmzgm Solvent Resid gmzgm 6( 60:60 60:60 60:60 60:60 Cycle of Scrubbing Agent Fresh lst Recycle 2nd Recycle 3rd Recycle Liguid Product Composition Wt. 72 H 12.43 12.95 12.95 13.63 13.56 C 83.52 85.16 85.46 84.40 84.60 N 0.79 0.90 0.21 0.42 0.13 s' 3.08 1.58 1.53 1.82 1.51 M61. Wt. 609 301 338 340 390 Ppm. Ni 86 7.3 8.8 10 6.9 Ppm. v 1018 41 26 14 25 Ramsbottom Carbon 14.29 4.93 4.82 4.95 5.ll Gms. Carbon Recovered 6.7 4.4 3.6 [.4
  • Example 13 A demetallized product residual oil obtained by the aforementioned hydrogen donor. porous scrubbing agent treating technique was further subjected to desulfurization by hydrogenation with a conventional sulfided cobalt-molybdenum on alumina catalyst. The details of the procedure are shown in Table V.
  • a process for the reduction of sulfur and removal of metal contaminants from a petroleum residual oil without significant coking which comprises the steps of contacting said oil with a hydrogen donor liquid and a highly porous. inorganic scrubbing agent at a temperature of incipient coking at a pressure of about 500 to 5,000 psig., and at a weight ratio of hydrogen donor liquid to residual oil of from about 0.1 to 10, separating the liquid hydrogen donor and demetallized products from said highly porous inorganic scrubbing agent, regenerating said highly porous inorganic scrubbing agent in an air-regeneration zone to remove carbon deposits while leaving metals in the pores of said scrub- .bing agent and recycling said regenerated metalcontaining inorganic scrubbing agent for further contact with residual oil and hydrogen donor liquid.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)

Abstract

A process for removing metal contaminants from a petroleum residual oil without significant coking and loss of hydrocarbons by treating such oils with a hydrogen donor solvent in the presence of a highly porous inorganic scrubbing agent and recycling the regenerated metal-containing scrubbing agent.

Description

United States Patent Vanvenrooy Oct. 1, 1974 REMOVING METAL CONTAMINANTS FROM PETROLEUM RESIDUAL OIL Inventor:
Assignee:
Philadelphia, Pa.
Filed:
Appl. No.:
Nov. 2, 1972 Related US. Application Data John J. Vanvenrooy, Media, Pa.
Sun Oil Company of Pennsylvania,
Continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 144,161, May 17, 1971, abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 67,085, Aug. 26, 1970, abandoned.
US. Cl 208/214, 208/209, 208/210,
w 7 7 7 208/307 Int. Cl C10g 23/12 Field of Search 208/214, 213, 307, 251 1-1, 208/253, 209-21 1 References Cited UNITED STATES PATENTS Rosen 208/214 HY DROGEN MAKE-UP Nicholson 208/211 Shepherd .1 208/210 Conn et a1. 208/251 Schuman 208/210 Primary ExaminerDe1bert E. Gantz Assistant Examiner-C. E. Spresser Attorney, Agent, or Firm-Mr. George L. Church; Mr. Donald R. Johnson; Mr. Anthony J. Dixon 5 7] ABSTRACT 7 Claims, 1 Drawing Figure HY DROGEN RICH RECYCLE 7 GAS OlL- 1 FEED ATMOSPHERIC BOTTOMS VA C U UM TOWER MAKE-UP FRESH "sorrows scnuasmc Aesu ridf/y VACUU M TUBE FURNACE RE ACTO R SCRUBBING AGENT REGENERATOR SC RUBBING AGEN T DEMETALLIZ ER RECOVE RE D METALS GAS-SOLID SLURRY SEPARATOR LOW BOILING HYDROCA RBO NS NAPHTHA SPENT SCRUBBING AGENT l T HYDROCRACKATE BOTTOMS LOW BOILING HYDROCARBO N5 FRACTJONATOR HYDROGEN HYDROGEN MAKE'UP RICH RECYCLE7 /i GAS LIQUID SEPARATOR HYDROCRACKER M ..i
lHYDROTREAT E R REMOVING METAL CONTAMINANTS FROM PETROLEUM RESIDUAL OIL CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS This application is a continuation-in-part of my copending application Ser. No, 144,161, filed May 17, 1971 now abandoned, which was a continuation-inpart of my copending application Ser. No. 67,085, filed Aug. 26, 1970, now abandoned.
As is well known in the petroleum industry the most valuable products obtained from a crude petroleum stream are those hydrocarbons which boil below approximately 800F. Since a substantial proportion of the crude petroleum boils above this temperature, a great deal of effort has been expended by the petroleum industry to convert these higher boiling streams to valuable feedstocks. Included in such efforts has been the refining of the residual stream, generally boiling above 1,000F., to increase the recovery of naphtha for subsequent catalytic cracking processes.
The residual stock itself cannot be economically directly cracked due to the presence of substantial portions of metal contaminants, particularly nickel and vanadium components. These metals, which may be present in quantities of from about to 50 pounds of metal per 1,000 barrels of crude, deposit on the catalyst during the conversion in such a fashion that regeneration of the catalyst is extremely difficult. Further, the cracking operation of the stream itself is adversely affected since the contaminants deposited decrease the catalyst activity, and cause excessive coke to be formed during the catalytic cracking, with a resulting loss in hydrocarbon product.
As an alternative means of upgrading a residual stream, a refining method referred to as hydrogen donor diluent processing has been developed. By this method, a hydrogen donor, such as hydrocrackate bottoms containing at least in part partially hydrogenated polycyclic aromatic compounds, is blended with a crude residual oil during thermal cracking, generally in the temperature range of 700-1,000F. to yield naphtha with only a small amount of coke. No catalyst is used in the hydrogen donor process and hence, the problem of catalyst fouling is at least initially alleviated. This process and the use of hydrocrackate bottoms is best exemplified by U.S. Pat. No. 3,238,118 of William Floyd Arey. Jr. and Ralph Burgess Mason, Issued Mar. 1, 1966.
Although the hydrogen donor process has been successful in upgrading the residual stream, the problem of metal contamination has not been fully remedied. That is, the process does not' inherently tend to remove the contaminating metals from the stream and hence, when the upgraded stream is ultimately subjected to a catalytic cracking process, the aforementioned fouling problems will still be present. Also, if, as in U.S. Pat No. 3,238,] 18. the improved stream is recycled to the fractionator then a build-up of the metals will occur. Some relief from this problem may be obtained by purging the residual feed to remove the contaminants and return the purged stream to the conversion zone, but this has proved both inefficient and costly. It should be noted that the term metal as herein employed refers to those metals which are chemically bound to the high boiling molecular structures that make up the residual portion of a crude oil e.g., Ni or V bound in a porphyrin structure. Another problem inherent in prior art processes is the coking that occurs during treatment of the residual oils and such coking both degrades the oil and makes further processing difficult. Associated with the coking phenomenon is the consumption of hydrogen with formation of increased quantities of methane and this, too, is undesirable in that it reflects loss of hydrocarbon and makes for an inefficient process.
It is therefore the overall object of this invention to provide a process for upgrading a petroleum residual stream by removing a substantial portion of the metal contaminants present in the residual stream without incurring any significant amount of coking. It is an additional object of this invention to provide a hydrotreating, hydrocracking process sequence on the demetallized liquid product to remove sulfur and nitrogen contaminants and to provide a hydrogen donor solvent for recycle to the demetallizer. The distillate materials produced by this system are highly purified and are therefore quite suitable for conversion into petroleum products.
In accordance with the foregoing objects, it has been found that a metals-contaminated petroleum residual stream can be upgraded without significant coking, by subjecting the residual stream to a hydrogen donor diluent process in the presence of a porous, high surface, inorganic scrubbing agent, separating the metal containing inorganic material and regenerating and recycling it for reuse.
The process is particularly suitable for those highly contaminated streams containing greater than 500 ppm. of metals, particularly where the metals are nickel and vanadium. The demetallization step of this process may be carried out in a slurry type of operation or in an ebullated bed but preferably in a slurry operation. As a further embodiment of the invention, the residual streams can first be subjected to the hydrogen donor diluent process and then contacted with a scrubbing agent, but the preferred operation and that which secures superior results is when the processes are carried out together. It should be noted that satisfactory results are not obtained when the residual stream is first contacted with a scrubbing agent and then subjected to the hydrogen donor process. I
The hydrogen donor, porous scrubbing agent deme tallization step is carried out at temperatures of incipient coking which is usually in the range of from at least about 750F. to 1,000F. and at a pressure in the range of from about 500 to 5,000 psig. The hydrogen donor to residual oil ratio will generally be from about 0.1 to 10. The preferred conditions consist of a temperature in the range of from about 750 to about 875F., a hydrogen pressure in the range of from about 1,000 to about 3,000 psig, and a hydrogen donor to residual oil weight ratio of from about 0.25 to about 2.5, and the conversion is generally carried out for a period of from 5 minutes to 3 hours. The ratio of hydrogen donor to resid is not critical with respect to metals removal, but in order to minimize carbon build-up it is preferable to operate the process at a donor to resid weight ratio of about 1. This will depend on hydrogen donor ability of the solvent and the activity of the regenerated recycled porous scrubbing agent. The hydrogen donor can be any such material well-known in the art such as hydrocrackate bottoms or other refinery stream containing partially hydrogenated polycyclic aromatics compounds, with the preferred donor being hydrocrackate bottoms.
As aforenoted, the highly porous inorganic scrubbing agent can be any porous, high surface area, inorganic adsorbent material such as alumina silicates. The pore size of the material should be large enough to accept the metals as their sulfides, and generally it should have a minimum pore size of at least 30 A but preferably may possess a broad range of pore size distribution to facilitate entry and accumulation of the metallic components deposited from the contaminated residual oil. The materials surface area should generally be at least 50 sq. M/gm. measured by nitrogen adsorption but preferably will have a surface area of 100 to 250 sq. M/gm. Examples of suitable agents are montmorillonite, beidellite, kaolinite, etc. and polygorskite minerals such as attapulgus clay which is a preferred scrubbing agent. Activated alumina and activated bauxite possessing high surface area are also highly suitable as scrubbing agents for use in this invention. Once the scrubbing agent has been employed either during or after the hydrogen donor thermal conversion process, it is withdrawn from the system, regenerated, and returned thereto for additional use, since it has been found that the use of the regenerated scrubbing agent has a significant effect in minimizing any tendency to form coke. The material can be regenerated by any system well-known in the art, such as thermal treating with air or an air-inert gas mixture to burn off coke without sintering. It should be noted that the scrubbing agent serves a dual purpose. Besides its major function of removing metal contaminants, the material also functions as a site for the deposition of any coke that might be formed and also provides a scouring action on the walls of the process equipment. The amount of scrubbing agent generally used in the system will be from about 3 to about 15 weight percent based on the charge to the reactor. The quantity of scrubbing agent charged depends on the coking tendency of the residual oil, residence time, H pressure, and amount of Ni and V accumulated from previous exposures to metalliferous residual oils.
A general mode of carrying out the instant invention when employing hydrocrackate bottoms as the hydrogen donor is exemplified in the drawing as follows: A whole crude petroleum oil which has been subjected to atmospheric distillation to remove light material or other feed such as heavy athabascan tar oil is separated in a vacuum tower into fractions including therein a gas oil fraction (11) boiling from about 500F. up to about l,0OOF. and a bottoms or residual stream (12) boiling above about the end point of the gas oil stream and this residual stream is ultimately subjected to the combined hydrogen donor diluent-porous scrubbing agent process of this invention which occurs in the demetallizer (13).
The separated gas oil fraction is fed from the vacuum tower (10) to a hydrotreating reactor (26) and then to a hydrocracking reactor (14) where hydrocracking occurs in the presence of a hydrocracking catalyst under conditions well known in the art. The feed is generally subjected to temperatures in the range of from 550 to 850F. at a pressure of from 500 to 2,500 p.s.i.g. Suit able catalysts for hydrotreating include the well known alumina supported cobalt-molybdenum and nickelmolybdenum catalysts. The hydrocracking catalyst may be any suitable hydrocracking catalyst, such as nickel sulfide on silica-alumina, a noble metal such as platinum or palladium on a molecular sieve base having uniform pore openings between about 6 and 15 angstrom units, noble metal on silica-alumina, and various catalysts comprising Group VI and VIII metals, oxides and sulfides on suitable supports such as silica-alumina,
, clays, etc. A hydrogen stream (15) is also introduced into the hydrotreater.
Following the hydrocracking reaction, the products are withdrawn, cooled and passed into a separator (16) wherein hydrogen-containing gas is separated from the liquid. This gas can then be recycled into the hydrotreating zone. The liquid product then passes into a fractionator (17) where several light fractions are separated leaving a hydrocrackate bottoms (18) which will be used as the hydrogen donor in the process of the invention. In order for the bottoms to be successfully employed as such, it will have a boiling point above about 430F. and have more than about 20 percent by volume of condensed ring naphthenes. To insure such properties, the hydrocracking reaction should be carried out at pressure greater than 800 psig and temperatures less than 800F. Further, since the naphthene content of the bottoms varies with the conversion, the feed rate should be such as to limit conversion to less than percent.
The hydrocrackate bottoms are combined with the residual or crude oil bottoms stream (12) from'the vacuum tower (10) in desired proportions, heated, and passed to a thermal demetallizing zone, such as a tube furnace reactor, (13) wherein the scrubbing agent (19) is introduced. The scrubbing agent introduced is a mixture of mainly regenerated, recycled material .plus some fresh make-up material. The aforementioned temperature and pressure conditions are maintained in the zone. The recycled scrubbing agent containing Ni and V previously deposited provides sufficient catalytic activity to minimize coke formation. Within the reactor (13) hydrogen exchange occurs between the residual oil and the hydrocrackate bottoms by the release of hydrogen from the donor to produce lower boiling hydrocarbons, and thermal cracking occurs within the zone. Hydrogen is also adsorbed from the gas phase due to the activity of the recycled scrubbing agent. Also, a substantial amount of metals present in the residual stream are accumulated on the scrubbing agent, as is some coke formed during the conversion, thus allowing for the easy removal and recovery of the metals. Electromicroprobe analysis of the scrubbing agent reveals that the nickel and vanadium from the contaminated oil has permeated into the porous interior of the scrubbing agent.
Following the conversion, the product is removed from the reactor and is then further processed for the recovery of petroleum fractions in a gas-solid slurry separator (20) and a liquid-solid separator (21). The liquid reactor products are separated in a fractionator (25) to yield low boiling hydrocarbons, naphtha and gas oil. The gas oil and similar products fromthe fractionator (25) are also fed to the hydrotreater (26) and then to the hydrocracker (14). The scrubbing agent used for the acculation of the metallic contaminants is separated by filtration or centrifuging in the liquid-solid separator (21) and spent scrubbing agent (22) regenerated in the regenerator (23) and recycled to the demetallizer-reactor (13). Part of the scrubbing agent may be processed to recover the deposited metals (24).
The regeneration step simply involves burning off any coke from the used agent, but leaving the metals in the pores. In accord with the invention, however, it is important that a major part of the spent scrubbing agent containing the metals removed from the resid will be returned directly to-the demetallizer since the metalcontaining scrubbing agent, surprisingly, results in improved metals pick-up and by means of this recycle system minimizes coke formation during the demetallizing step.
in this respect and this is an additional significant advantage.
In order to further illustrate the invention, the following examples are given:
Examples 1 to 3 The process details described above were followed using a Venezulean Lagomedio resid and a hydrogen and contains 16.1 percent asphaltenes. The scrubbing agent used was an attapulgus clay having a 100 mesh particle size and was regenerated for recycle by burning off any deposited carbon at 875F. The following table indicates the conditions of the various runs and it was used under recycle conditions (compare Example 2 without scrubbing agent with Example 3). Furthermore, the total of Ramsbottom carbon of the liquid product and recovered carbon (6.0lg) in Example 3 was significantly less than Examples 1 and 2 where the process of the invention was not in effect. It is also of interest that the amount of methane in the off-gases from Example 3 were lower than in Examples 1 and 2 and the sulfur content of the processed resid was also significantly reduced.
Examples 4 and 5 In a second set of runs shown in Table 11, preferred and severe conditions were used to illustrate the kind of conditions needed in a short contact time tube furnace reactor. The fed was a Venezuelan Lagomedio resid and a hydrogen donor solvent which was dewaxed hydrocrackate lube oil boiling above 650F. The scrubbing agent used was recycled bauxite in Example 4 and fresh bauxite in Example 5.
TABLE 11 Operating Data Feed Ex. 4 Ex. 5
Temp. "C 469 465 Time Min. 5 5 H pressure psi 2925 2600 Total H Adsorbed S,C.F./bbl 425 Catalyst/Resid gmzgm. 10/84 10/84 Catalyst Fresh Recycled Bauxite Bauxite Liguid Product Composition t 7v 13.01 12.12 C 84.92 85.91 N 0.29 0.43 S 1.50 1.47 M01. wt. 314 362 Ppm. Ni 38 4 6 Ppm. V 398 67 65 Rams Carbon of Liquid Product 8.6 7.59
7! Metals Removed Ni 87 84 V 83 83 gives the results obtained. w Based on as Ppm Ni and 39s Ppm v in mat-d TABLE 1 Feed Ex. 1 Ex. 2 Ex. 3 Operating Data Temp. C. 425 425 425 F. 797 797 797 Pressurep.s.i.g. 2500 2500 2500 'meHrs. 2.5 2.5 2.5 Total H Adsorbed S.C.F./bbl 310 Scrubbing Agent to 0 10:60 10:60
Resid Ratio-GmzGrn Solvent to Resid :60 60:60 60:60 60:60
RatioGm:Gm Scrubbing Agent Recycled No Yes Liguid Product Composition Wt, 71 of H 12.66 12.66 13.57 13.09 C 85.61 86.51 84.75 85.42 N 0.27 0.18 0.21 0.39 S 2.22 1.14 1.03 1.24 M01. Wt. 576 333 418 422 Ppm. Nickel 27 4 5 2.4 Ppm. Vanadium 285 33 30 11 Ramsbottom Carbon 8.0 6.12 5.12 5.71 Carbon Recovered 4.3 4.1 0.3
Off Gas Analysis H- 88.3 86.5 92.6 "/1 CH. 7.0 8.2 4.3
It can readily be seen from the above table that the scrubbing agent was only significantly effective in re-' ducing nickel and vanadium content of the resid when It can be seen from the table that at a higher temperature and pressure, significant amounts of metal are re-- moved at greatly reduced contact times over Example 3. Example 5, showing recycled bauxite also shows a significant decrease in Ramsbottom carbon of the liquid product over Example 4 where no recycle of the scrubbing agent was performed.
Examples 9 to l2 In another series of runs with Boscan resid, hydrocrackate bottoms as solvent and an activated bauxite 5 scrubbing agent having a 20 mesh particle size, the re- Examples 6 to 8 generation and recycle step was repeated three tlmes. In another series of runs a Ve'nezulean Boscan resid The data follow in Table IV. These data indicate the was used. This Boscan resid is a vacuum tower bottoms beneficial effect to be obtained by the use of a recycled consisting of matenal bo1lmg above 995F. and conporous scrubbing agent for obtaining improved metals tams 35.0 percent asphaltenes. The data is shown in removal while at the same time repressing coke and Table III. light gas formation. Chemical analysis by x-ray fluores- As 1s evldent from the table, the recycle system (Excence methods indicates the presence of about 0.5 ample 7) resulted in the lowest nickel and vandaium weight percent nickel and 2.0 weight percent 'vanadium content 1n the resid and this run also gave the smallest deposited in the pores of bauxite after being recycled amount of carbon formed. three times.
TABLE 111 Activity of Recycled Regenerated Attapulgus Clay Feed Ex. 6 Ex. 7 Ex. 8 Operating Data Temp. C. 425 425 425 H2 Pressure. p.s.i.g. 2500 2500 2500 H Adsorbed TOlZll, S.C.F./bbl 177 825 430 Scrubbing AgemzResid gmzgm l0z60 10:60 0:60 SolventzResid gmzgm 60:60 60:60 60:60 60:60 Scrubbing Agent Recycled No Yes Time. Hrs. 2.5 2.5 2.5
Liguid Product Comp.
Wt. H 12.43 14.94 14.76 14.45 C 83.52 84.10 83.63 84.84 N 0.79 0.35 0.84 0.26 S 3.08 L65 1.44 1.52 M61. Wt. 609 314 323 293 Ppm. Ni 86 10 5.4 9 Ppm. v 1018 48 28 Rams. Carbon of Liquid Product 14.29 4.20 5.72 4.32 GMs. of Carbon Recovered 6.7 2.07 4.58
0H Gas Analysis /r 1-1 81.9 82.0 79.4 "/1 CH. 9.3 9.8 11.5
TABLE IV Feed Ex. 9 Ex. 10 EX. 11 -Ex. 12
Operating Data Temp c. 425 425 425 425 Hz Pressure P.s.i.g. 2500 2500 2500 2500 Total H2 Adsorbed. S.C.F.lbb| 39 670 710 725 TimeHrs. 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Scrubbing AgcntzRcsid l0:60 l0:60 10:60 |0:60
gmzgm Solvent: Resid gmzgm 6( 60:60 60:60 60:60 60:60 Cycle of Scrubbing Agent Fresh lst Recycle 2nd Recycle 3rd Recycle Liguid Product Composition Wt. 72 H 12.43 12.95 12.95 13.63 13.56 C 83.52 85.16 85.46 84.40 84.60 N 0.79 0.90 0.21 0.42 0.13 s' 3.08 1.58 1.53 1.82 1.51 M61. Wt. 609 301 338 340 390 Ppm. Ni 86 7.3 8.8 10 6.9 Ppm. v 1018 41 26 14 25 Ramsbottom Carbon 14.29 4.93 4.82 4.95 5.ll Gms. Carbon Recovered 6.7 4.4 3.6 [.4
Off Gas Analysis Example 13 A demetallized product residual oil obtained by the aforementioned hydrogen donor. porous scrubbing agent treating technique was further subjected to desulfurization by hydrogenation with a conventional sulfided cobalt-molybdenum on alumina catalyst. The details of the procedure are shown in Table V.
Gms. Carbon Recovered 2.0
It is evident from the above data that the hydrogenated product is quite low in nickel, vanadium, nitrogen, and sulfur contamination and is thus quite suitable for further processing to useful petroleum products.
The invention claimed is:
1. A process for the reduction of sulfur and removal of metal contaminants from a petroleum residual oil without significant coking which comprises the steps of contacting said oil with a hydrogen donor liquid and a highly porous. inorganic scrubbing agent at a temperature of incipient coking at a pressure of about 500 to 5,000 psig., and at a weight ratio of hydrogen donor liquid to residual oil of from about 0.1 to 10, separating the liquid hydrogen donor and demetallized products from said highly porous inorganic scrubbing agent, regenerating said highly porous inorganic scrubbing agent in an air-regeneration zone to remove carbon deposits while leaving metals in the pores of said scrub- .bing agent and recycling said regenerated metalcontaining inorganic scrubbing agent for further contact with residual oil and hydrogen donor liquid.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein (a) the contact temperature of residual oil and hydrogen donor liquid is from about 750 to about 875F., (b) the donor solvent to residual oil weight ratio is from about 0.25 to about 2.5, and (c) the pressure is about 1,000 to about 3,000 psig.
3. The process of claim 2 where the scrubbing agent is attapulgus clay.
4. The process of claim 2 where the scrubbing agent is activated bauxite.
5. The process of claim 2 where the scrubbing agent is activated alumina.
6. The process of claim 2 wherein a minor amount of the metal in the petroleum residual oil feed is an added nickel or vanadium compound.
7. The process of claim 2 wherein the total metals content of the petroleum residual oil is at least about 500 ppm.

Claims (7)

1. A PROCESS FOR THE REDUCTION OFF SULFUR AND REMOVAL OF METAL CONTAMINANTS FROM A PETROLEUM RESIDUAL OIL WITHOUT
2. The process of claim 1 wherein (a) the contact temperature of residual oil and hydrogen donor liquid is from about 750* to about 875*F., (b) the donor solvent to residual oil weight ratio is from about 0.25 to about 2.5, and (c) the pressure is about 1, 000 to about 3,000 psig.
3. The process of claim 2 where the scrubbing agent is attapulgus clay.
4. The process of claim 2 where the scrubbing agent is activated bauxite.
5. The process of claim 2 where the scrubbing agent is activated alumina.
6. The process of claim 2 wherein a minor amount of the metal in the petroleum residual oil feed is an added nickel or vanadium compound.
7. The process of claim 2 wherein the total metals content of thE petroleum residual oil is at least about 500 ppm.
US00303152A 1971-05-17 1972-11-02 Removing metal contaminants from petroleum residual oil Expired - Lifetime US3839187A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US00303152A US3839187A (en) 1971-05-17 1972-11-02 Removing metal contaminants from petroleum residual oil

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US14416171A 1971-05-17 1971-05-17
US00303152A US3839187A (en) 1971-05-17 1972-11-02 Removing metal contaminants from petroleum residual oil

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3839187A true US3839187A (en) 1974-10-01

Family

ID=26841729

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US00303152A Expired - Lifetime US3839187A (en) 1971-05-17 1972-11-02 Removing metal contaminants from petroleum residual oil

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3839187A (en)

Cited By (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2949935A1 (en) * 1979-12-12 1981-06-19 Metallgesellschaft Ag, 6000 Frankfurt METHOD FOR CONVERTING HIGH-SEEDING RAW OILS TO PETROLEUM-LIKE PRODUCTS
US4411768A (en) * 1979-12-21 1983-10-25 The Lummus Company Hydrogenation of high boiling hydrocarbons
US4569753A (en) * 1981-09-01 1986-02-11 Ashland Oil, Inc. Oil upgrading by thermal and catalytic cracking
USRE32265E (en) * 1979-12-21 1986-10-14 Lummus Crest, Inc. Hydrogenation of high boiling hydrocarbons
US4894141A (en) * 1981-09-01 1990-01-16 Ashland Oil, Inc. Combination process for upgrading residual oils
EP1062296A1 (en) * 1997-12-16 2000-12-27 ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading
US6245223B1 (en) * 1997-12-16 2001-06-12 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading (law815)
US20040031726A1 (en) * 2002-08-16 2004-02-19 Cotte Edgar A. Additives for improving thermal conversion of heavy crude oil
US20080308465A1 (en) * 2007-06-12 2008-12-18 John Aibangbee Osaheni Methods and systems for removing metals from low grade fuel
US8609920B1 (en) 2012-12-12 2013-12-17 Uop Llc UZM-44 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8609911B1 (en) 2012-12-12 2013-12-17 Uop Llc Catalytic pyrolysis using UZM-44 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8609919B1 (en) 2012-12-12 2013-12-17 Uop Llc Aromatic transformation using UZM-44 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8609910B1 (en) 2012-12-12 2013-12-17 Uop Llc Catalytic pyrolysis using UZM-39 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8609921B1 (en) 2012-12-12 2013-12-17 Uop Llc Aromatic transalkylation using UZM-44 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8618343B1 (en) 2012-12-12 2013-12-31 Uop Llc Aromatic transalkylation using UZM-39 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8633344B2 (en) 2011-12-22 2014-01-21 Uop Llc Aromatic transformation using UZM-39 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8642823B2 (en) 2011-12-22 2014-02-04 Uop Llc UZM-39 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8889939B2 (en) 2012-12-12 2014-11-18 Uop Llc Dehydrocyclodimerization using UZM-44 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8907151B2 (en) 2012-12-12 2014-12-09 Uop Llc Conversion of methane to aromatic compounds using UZM-39 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8912378B2 (en) 2012-12-12 2014-12-16 Uop Llc Dehydrocyclodimerization using UZM-39 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8921634B2 (en) 2012-12-12 2014-12-30 Uop Llc Conversion of methane to aromatic compounds using UZM-44 aluminosilicate zeolite
US9005573B2 (en) 2011-12-22 2015-04-14 Uop Llc Layered conversion synthesis of zeolites

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2253308A (en) * 1937-05-05 1941-08-19 Standard Catalytic Co Desulphurization of hydrocarbons
US2717855A (en) * 1951-07-28 1955-09-13 Exxon Research Engineering Co Hydrodesulfurization of heavy oils
US2771401A (en) * 1954-08-05 1956-11-20 Exxon Research Engineering Co Desulfurization of crude oil and crude oil fractions
US2956004A (en) * 1958-03-25 1960-10-11 Standard Oil Co Removing metal contaminants from feeds
US3050459A (en) * 1959-01-13 1962-08-21 Hydrocarbon Research Inc Two-stage conversion of heavy oils

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2253308A (en) * 1937-05-05 1941-08-19 Standard Catalytic Co Desulphurization of hydrocarbons
US2717855A (en) * 1951-07-28 1955-09-13 Exxon Research Engineering Co Hydrodesulfurization of heavy oils
US2771401A (en) * 1954-08-05 1956-11-20 Exxon Research Engineering Co Desulfurization of crude oil and crude oil fractions
US2956004A (en) * 1958-03-25 1960-10-11 Standard Oil Co Removing metal contaminants from feeds
US3050459A (en) * 1959-01-13 1962-08-21 Hydrocarbon Research Inc Two-stage conversion of heavy oils

Cited By (28)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2949935A1 (en) * 1979-12-12 1981-06-19 Metallgesellschaft Ag, 6000 Frankfurt METHOD FOR CONVERTING HIGH-SEEDING RAW OILS TO PETROLEUM-LIKE PRODUCTS
US4411768A (en) * 1979-12-21 1983-10-25 The Lummus Company Hydrogenation of high boiling hydrocarbons
USRE32265E (en) * 1979-12-21 1986-10-14 Lummus Crest, Inc. Hydrogenation of high boiling hydrocarbons
US4569753A (en) * 1981-09-01 1986-02-11 Ashland Oil, Inc. Oil upgrading by thermal and catalytic cracking
US4894141A (en) * 1981-09-01 1990-01-16 Ashland Oil, Inc. Combination process for upgrading residual oils
US6245223B1 (en) * 1997-12-16 2001-06-12 Exxonmobil Research And Engineering Company Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading (law815)
EP1062296A1 (en) * 1997-12-16 2000-12-27 ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading
EP1062296A4 (en) * 1997-12-16 2003-01-22 Exxonmobil Res & Eng Co Selective adsorption process for resid upgrading
US20040031726A1 (en) * 2002-08-16 2004-02-19 Cotte Edgar A. Additives for improving thermal conversion of heavy crude oil
US7067053B2 (en) 2002-08-16 2006-06-27 Intevep, S.A. Additives for improving thermal conversion of heavy crude oil
US20080308465A1 (en) * 2007-06-12 2008-12-18 John Aibangbee Osaheni Methods and systems for removing metals from low grade fuel
EP2011849A1 (en) * 2007-06-12 2009-01-07 General Electric Company Methods and systems for removing metals from low grade fuel
US7947167B2 (en) * 2007-06-12 2011-05-24 General Electric Company Methods and systems for removing metals from low grade fuel
US8642823B2 (en) 2011-12-22 2014-02-04 Uop Llc UZM-39 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8633344B2 (en) 2011-12-22 2014-01-21 Uop Llc Aromatic transformation using UZM-39 aluminosilicate zeolite
US9005573B2 (en) 2011-12-22 2015-04-14 Uop Llc Layered conversion synthesis of zeolites
US8992885B2 (en) 2011-12-22 2015-03-31 Uop Llc UZM-39 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8609921B1 (en) 2012-12-12 2013-12-17 Uop Llc Aromatic transalkylation using UZM-44 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8618343B1 (en) 2012-12-12 2013-12-31 Uop Llc Aromatic transalkylation using UZM-39 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8623321B1 (en) 2012-12-12 2014-01-07 Uop Llc UZM-44 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8609911B1 (en) 2012-12-12 2013-12-17 Uop Llc Catalytic pyrolysis using UZM-44 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8609920B1 (en) 2012-12-12 2013-12-17 Uop Llc UZM-44 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8889939B2 (en) 2012-12-12 2014-11-18 Uop Llc Dehydrocyclodimerization using UZM-44 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8907151B2 (en) 2012-12-12 2014-12-09 Uop Llc Conversion of methane to aromatic compounds using UZM-39 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8912378B2 (en) 2012-12-12 2014-12-16 Uop Llc Dehydrocyclodimerization using UZM-39 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8921634B2 (en) 2012-12-12 2014-12-30 Uop Llc Conversion of methane to aromatic compounds using UZM-44 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8609910B1 (en) 2012-12-12 2013-12-17 Uop Llc Catalytic pyrolysis using UZM-39 aluminosilicate zeolite
US8609919B1 (en) 2012-12-12 2013-12-17 Uop Llc Aromatic transformation using UZM-44 aluminosilicate zeolite

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3839187A (en) Removing metal contaminants from petroleum residual oil
US4225415A (en) Recovering hydrocarbons from hydrocarbon-containing vapors
US3712861A (en) Upgrading a hydrocarbon utilizing a catalyst of metal sulfides dispersed in alumina
US3947347A (en) Process for removing metalliferous contaminants from hydrocarbons
US5209840A (en) Separation of active catalyst particles from spent catalyst particles by air elutriation
US5080777A (en) Refining of heavy slurry oil fractions
US3546103A (en) Hydrogenation catalysts on charcoal in guard chamber for removing metals from petroleum residua
US3779895A (en) Treatment of heavy petroleum oils
US3733259A (en) Treatment of heavy petroleum oils
CA1304034C (en) Method for hydrocracking heavy fraction oil
US5358630A (en) Regenerating zeolitic cracking catalyst
US4363717A (en) Conversion of heavy hydrocarbon oils
US3365389A (en) Residuum conversion process
US3817855A (en) Hydroprocessing of resids with metal adsorption on the second stage catalyst
US6406615B1 (en) Hydrotreating process for residual oil
CA1121750A (en) Demetallization of hydrocarbon feedstock
JP2995269B2 (en) Removal of metal contaminants from hydrocarbon liquids
US3948756A (en) Pentane insoluble asphaltene removal
US2495723A (en) Liquid phase cracking of hydrocarbons with water-saturated catalysts
US4082648A (en) Process for separating solid asphaltic fraction from hydrocracked petroleum feedstock
US3553106A (en) Catalytic removal of vanadium and nickel from oils
US3663429A (en) Process for hydroconversion of raw shale oil
EP0420652A1 (en) Slurry hydrotreating process
JPS6176589A (en) Two stage crosslinkable hydrogenation of heavy hydrocarbon raw material oil
US4141820A (en) Process for upgrading arsenic-containing oils