Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

US3767389A - Maraging stainless steel particularly for use in cast condition - Google Patents

Maraging stainless steel particularly for use in cast condition Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3767389A
US3767389A US00181234A US3767389DA US3767389A US 3767389 A US3767389 A US 3767389A US 00181234 A US00181234 A US 00181234A US 3767389D A US3767389D A US 3767389DA US 3767389 A US3767389 A US 3767389A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
percent
nickel
accordance
chromium
alloy
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US00181234A
Inventor
S Floreen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Huntington Alloys Corp
Original Assignee
International Nickel Co Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from JP725771A external-priority patent/JPS5341335B1/ja
Application filed by International Nickel Co Inc filed Critical International Nickel Co Inc
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3767389A publication Critical patent/US3767389A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01MPROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
    • H01M50/00Constructional details or processes of manufacture of the non-active parts of electrochemical cells other than fuel cells, e.g. hybrid cells
    • H01M50/50Current conducting connections for cells or batteries
    • H01M50/528Fixed electrical connections, i.e. not intended for disconnection
    • H01M50/529Intercell connections through partitions, e.g. in a battery casing
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02EREDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
    • Y02E60/00Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
    • Y02E60/10Energy storage using batteries
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T29/00Metal working
    • Y10T29/49Method of mechanical manufacture
    • Y10T29/49002Electrical device making
    • Y10T29/49108Electric battery cell making

Definitions

  • ABSTRACT A maraging stainless steel containing correlated [52] 75/128 75/124 T amounts of nickel, chromium, silicon, and metal from [51] Int. Cl. C22c 3 /20 the group consisting of aluminum and titanium, the [58] Field of Search 75/128 T, 128 N, Steel being particularly Suitable in cast form since it 75/124 affords a combination of good strength, toughness and corrosion resistance and also exhibits excellent [56] References cued foundry characteristics.
  • the steels contain properly correlated amounts of nickel, chromium, silicon, metal from the group consisting of aluminum and titanium, and other elements as set forth herein.
  • the present invention contemplates cast stainless maraging steels containing (in weight per cent) from percent to about 12.5 percent, e.g., 10 to 12 percent, chromium, about 7.5 to 11 percent, e.g., 8 to 10 percent, nickel, the sum of the chromium plus nickel being at least 18 percent, e.g., 19 percent, but less than 22 percent and advantageously not over 21.5 percent, about 1.5 to 3 .percent silicon, a small but effective amount, e.g., 0.01 percent, of metal from the group consisting of aluminum and titanium, up to about 1 percent manganese, up to about 0.05 percent carbon and the balance essentially iron.
  • the chromium content fall below about 10 percent corrosion resistance is impaired. Moreover, mechanical properties can be decidedly unattractive. On the other hand, at chromium levelsmuch above 12.5 percent, problems due to delta ferrite can arise, thus adversely affecting toughness characteristics. This is particularly true with low percentages of nickel. For this reason, among others, in seeking the highest combination of strength and toughness, the nickel content should be at least 7.5 percent and is most beneficially at least 8 percent or 8.5 percent, since it both inhibits delta ferrite formation and markedly enhances toughness. However, in respect of the lower strength steels, good results can be achieved at reduced percentages of nickel,
  • the alloys are undesirably characterized by low M, temperatures. Therefore, the sum of the chromium plus nickel should be less than 22 percent and in striving for optimum results should not exceed 21 percent or 21.5 percent. It might be pointed out that the M, temperature should not be lower than about 325F. to 350F. to thereby as sure obtaining steels which upon transformation are characterized by an essentially martensitic structure upon cooling from say, hot working or annealing temperatures and the like.
  • silicon it should not fall below about 1.5 percent where the emphasis is on the higher strength steels. Percentages much above 3 percent silicon, while imparting strength, detract from toughness, particularly the ability of the steels to absorb impact energy. A silicon range of 1.6 to 2.5 percent, e.g., 1.8 to 2.3 percent, is most satisfactory. Lower amounts of silicon can be used in connection with steels having tensile strengths between about 125,000 and 150,000 psi; however, at least about 0.5 percent silicon, e.g., at least 0.6 percent, is necessary for good foundry characteristics and to facilitate ease of castability.
  • the steels contain not more than about 0.2 percent of aluminum and/or titanium. In aiming for optimum properties, from 0.02 to 0.07 percent .of each of these elements has been found to afford excellent results.
  • manganese can be present in the steels in accordance herewith in percentages up to about 1 percent, it is nonetheless extremelyadvantageous to maintain this constituent at much lower levels, to wit: not above about 0.4 to 0.5 percent. As will be demonstrated herein, manganese can impair the capability of the steels to absorb high levels of impact energy. As to carbon, if toughness characteristics are not to be needlessly sacrificed this element should not be present in amounts above 0.05 percent and, indeed, should be maintained at significantly lower levels, e.g., below about 0.03 percent or 0.02 percent.
  • a series of 30 pound air-induction melts utilizing electrolytic grade metals as starting materials was prepared.
  • the furnace was first charged with iron and nickel together with about 0.05 percent carbon (carbon boil) for the deoxidation. Thereafter, about 0.1 percent each of aluminum and titanium was added followed by the silicon addition.
  • the heats were cast in dry said double keel block molds, the leg of each keel being 1 inch X Hinches X 7 inches in length. Standard tensile 1 inch) and Charpy V-Notch impact specimens were machined from the keel block and were thereafter solution annealed about one hour at 1900F., air cooled and maraged at about 850F. for about 3 hours. The results of these tests are reported in Tables I and II.
  • alloys containing from about 10 to 12 percent chromium, 8.5 to 10 percent nickel and about 1.8 to 2.3 percent silicon are exceptionally good.
  • Alloy C confirms that significantly lower levels of nickel (5 percent) subvert resistance to impact. Alloy 10 reflects that as the nickel content is increased above 9 percent in these less pure materials, impact resistance is not benefitted. The low strength of Alloy D is deemed attributable to retained austenite. From overall considerations it is preferred to maintain the nickel content at not more than 9 percent regardless of silicon content.
  • Foundry characteristics were evaluated by pouring dry sand mold fluidity spirals at three different pouring temperatures, 2950F., 2850F. and 2775F.
  • the steel used nominally contained 11.5 percent chromium, 8.5 percent nickel and 2 percent silicon, the balance being essentially iron.
  • the resulting spiral lengths were 35 inches, 31 inches and 17 inches,-respectively. Each of the spirals exhibited good mold filling capability.
  • the freezing temperature of the steel was approximately 2600F. Accordingly, in view of the pouring temperature and degree of super-heat, the fluidity measurements indicated that the castability of the subject steels would be at least as good as if perhaps not better than standard cast CF-8 stainless steel.
  • the cast steels of the present invention can be utilized for such applications as wearing rings, compressor wheels, corrosion resistant gears, high pressure valves, propellers, components for power plant pumps, including impellers, stage pieces, diffusers, etc., and for applications generally requiring steels which manifest a good combination of corrosion resistance, strength and toughness.
  • the steels above described have been set forth solely in connection with applications as cast steels they also are useful in the wrought form.
  • the nickel content can be lowered to 5.5 percent or even 5 percent and the chromium content can be extended up to 15 percent, the sum of the chromium and nickel being less than 22 percent. This obtains over the full silicon range.
  • a maraging stainless steel in the cast and martensitic condition consisting essentially of from about percent to about 12.5 percent chromium, about 7.5 percent to about 11 percent nickel, the sum of the chromium plus nickel being at least about 18 percent but less than 22 percent, about 1.5 percent to about 3 percent silicon, metal from the group consisting of titanium and aluminum in a small but effective amount sufficient to enhance the toughness of the steel, the titanium and aluminum not exceeding about 0.2 percent each, up to about 1 percent manganese, up to 0.05 percent carbon and the balance iron.
  • An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing from about 11 percent to about 12 percent chromium.
  • An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing from about 8 percent to about 10 percent nickel.
  • An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 0.02 percent to about 0.07 percent each of titanium and aluminum.
  • An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 1 1 percent to about 12 percent chromium, about 8.5 to 9.5 percent nickel, the chromium plus nickel being from about 20 to 21.5 percent, about 1.8 percent to about 2.3 percent silicon, up to about 0.5 percent manganese, up to 0.03 percent carbon, and 0.01 to 0.1 percent of titanium and aluminum.
  • a maraging steel in the martensitic condition consisting essentially of about 10 percent to about 15 percent chromium, from 5 to 11 percent nickel, the sum of the chromium plus nickel being at least 18 percent but less than 22 percent, about 0.5 percent to about 3 percent silicon, metal from the groupconsisting of titanium and aluminum in a small but effective amount sufficient to enhance the toughness of the steel, the titanium and aluminum not exceeding about 0.2 percent each, up to about 1 percent manganese, up to 0.5 percent carbon and the balance iron.
  • An alloy in accordance with claim 13 containing 11 to 15 percent chromium, 7.5 to 9.5 percent nickel, 1.8 to 2.3 percent silicon, metal from the group consisting of aluminum up to 0.1 percent and titanium up to 0.1 percent, up to 0.5 percent manganese, and up to 0.03 percent carbon.
  • a cast maraging steel in the martensitic condition consisting essentially of about 10 percent to about 15 percent chromium, from 5 to l 1 percent nickel, the sum of the chromium plus nickel being at least 18 percent but less than 22 percent, about 0.5 percent to about 3 percent silicon, metal from the group consisting of titanium and aluminum in a small but effective amount sufficient to enhance the toughness of the steel, the titanium and aluminum not exceeding about 0.2 percent each, up to about 1 percent manganese, up to 0.5 percent carbon, and the balance iron.
  • a cast maraging steel in accordance with claim 15 containing from 6.5 percent to about 8 percent nickel and from 0.6 to 1 percent silicon.
  • a cast maraging steel in accordance with claim 16 containing 0.01 to 0.1 percent aluminum and 0.01

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Connection Of Batteries Or Terminals (AREA)
  • Arc Welding In General (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)

Abstract

A maraging stainless steel containing correlated amounts of nickel, chromium, silicon, and metal from the group consisting of aluminum and titanium, the steel being particularly suitable in cast form since it affords a combination of good strength, toughness and corrosion resistance and also exhibits excellent foundry characteristics.

Description

United States Patent Floreen Oct. 23, 1973 MARAGING STAINLESS STEEL 2,505,763 5 1970 GOllfll 75 124 PARTICULARLY FOR USE IN CAST 2,738,267 5/1950 Pakkala 75/124 2,820,708 1/1958 Waxweiler.... 75/128 CONDITION 3,278,298 10/1966 Perry 75/128 [75] Inventor: Stephen Floreen, Suffern, N.Y. 3,251,683 5/1966 Hammond t 75/l28 T 3,532,491 10/1970 Floreen 75/128 T 1 Asslgneel The Intematloflal Nlckel Company, 2,801,916 8/1967 Harris 75/128 T Inc., New York, N.Y.
[22] Filed: Sept 1971 Primary ExaminerHyland Bizot 2 Appl, 1 1,234 Attorney-Maurice L. Pinel Related US. Application Data [63] Continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 865,969, Oct. 13,
1969, abandoned. [57] ABSTRACT A maraging stainless steel containing correlated [52] 75/128 75/124 T amounts of nickel, chromium, silicon, and metal from [51] Int. Cl. C22c 3 /20 the group consisting of aluminum and titanium, the [58] Field of Search 75/128 T, 128 N, Steel being particularly Suitable in cast form since it 75/124 affords a combination of good strength, toughness and corrosion resistance and also exhibits excellent [56] References cued foundry characteristics.
UNITED STATES PATENTS 10/1964 Lula 75/124 17 Claims, No Drawings MARAGING STAINLESS STEEL PARTICULARLY FOR USE IN CAST CONDITION This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 865,969, filed Oct. 13, 1969.
Nearly a decade has passed since the original discovery of the so-designated maraging steels. And while research continues on an extensive basis there is not yet on the commercial scene, at least insofar as I am aware, a low cost, cast stainless maraging steel. Conventional cast versions, however, have long been in commercial production, for example, the cast maraging steel described in US. Pat. No. 3,132,937. Indeed, significant processing improvements have been attained in respect of such cast steels as evident from the heat treating procedures set forth in US. Pat. No. 3,341,372. Nonetheless, such steels are, at least comparatively speaking, relatively costly and, more importantly, do not exhibit stainless characteristics.
Thus, there exists a hiatus in the maraging family of steels, to wit: a cast stainless maraging steel which in one package offers low cost, high corrosion resistance, good foundry characteristics and a tensile strength on the order of, say, about 150,000 psi or more, coupled with good toughness, although such steels with strengths as low as about 125,000 psi are also quite useful for many applications.
It has now been discovered that the foregoing objectives can be attained provided the steels contain properly correlated amounts of nickel, chromium, silicon, metal from the group consisting of aluminum and titanium, and other elements as set forth herein.
Generally speaking, where tensile strengths on the order of about 150,000 psi and higher are necessary together with good corrosion resistance and toughness, the present invention contemplates cast stainless maraging steels containing (in weight per cent) from percent to about 12.5 percent, e.g., 10 to 12 percent, chromium, about 7.5 to 11 percent, e.g., 8 to 10 percent, nickel, the sum of the chromium plus nickel being at least 18 percent, e.g., 19 percent, but less than 22 percent and advantageously not over 21.5 percent, about 1.5 to 3 .percent silicon, a small but effective amount, e.g., 0.01 percent, of metal from the group consisting of aluminum and titanium, up to about 1 percent manganese, up to about 0.05 percent carbon and the balance essentially iron. For tensile strengths down to about 125,000 psi, lower percentages of silicon and nickel can be utilized as explained herein. Further, the sum of chromium plus nickel can be as low as 17.5 percent. Elements such as phosphorus, sulfur, oxygen and nitrogen should be kept at low levels consistent with good commercial steelmaking practice.
In carrying the invention into practice should the chromium content fall below about 10 percent corrosion resistance is impaired. Moreover, mechanical properties can be decidedly unattractive. On the other hand, at chromium levelsmuch above 12.5 percent, problems due to delta ferrite can arise, thus adversely affecting toughness characteristics. This is particularly true with low percentages of nickel. For this reason, among others, in seeking the highest combination of strength and toughness, the nickel content should be at least 7.5 percent and is most beneficially at least 8 percent or 8.5 percent, since it both inhibits delta ferrite formation and markedly enhances toughness. However, in respect of the lower strength steels, good results can be achieved at reduced percentages of nickel,
i.e., about 6 percent or 6.5 percent, particularly with silicon contents below 1.5 percent. Silicon, as does chromium, also tends to promote delta ferrite and as the amount thereof is reduced less nickel is thus required, other factors being equal.
Although nickel counteracts delta ferrite and promotes toughness and though chromium imparts the primary resistant effect to various corrosive media, it has been found that together these constituents can be present to such an extent that mechanical properties are subverted by reason of the fact that the alloys are undesirably characterized by low M, temperatures. Therefore, the sum of the chromium plus nickel should be less than 22 percent and in striving for optimum results should not exceed 21 percent or 21.5 percent. It might be pointed out that the M, temperature should not be lower than about 325F. to 350F. to thereby as sure obtaining steels which upon transformation are characterized by an essentially martensitic structure upon cooling from say, hot working or annealing temperatures and the like.
With regard to silicon, it should not fall below about 1.5 percent where the emphasis is on the higher strength steels. Percentages much above 3 percent silicon, while imparting strength, detract from toughness, particularly the ability of the steels to absorb impact energy. A silicon range of 1.6 to 2.5 percent, e.g., 1.8 to 2.3 percent, is most satisfactory. Lower amounts of silicon can be used in connection with steels having tensile strengths between about 125,000 and 150,000 psi; however, at least about 0.5 percent silicon, e.g., at least 0.6 percent, is necessary for good foundry characteristics and to facilitate ease of castability.
In the absence of either or both aluminum and titanium mechanical properties, particularly in respect to air melted steels, are deleteriously affected. These constituents are deemed to tie up interstitials (carbon, nitrogen) and such elements as oxygen, the presence of which might otherwise bring about an undesirable loss in toughness. Only a small amount, e.g., 0.01 percent or 0.02 percent, of either or both of these constituents need be present and it is not necessary that either exceed 0.1 percent or 0.2 percent or that the total amount exceed about 0.3 percent.- Preferably, the steels contain not more than about 0.2 percent of aluminum and/or titanium. In aiming for optimum properties, from 0.02 to 0.07 percent .of each of these elements has been found to afford excellent results.
While it is above indicated that manganese can be present in the steels in accordance herewith in percentages up to about 1 percent, it is nonetheless extremelyadvantageous to maintain this constituent at much lower levels, to wit: not above about 0.4 to 0.5 percent. As will be demonstrated herein, manganese can impair the capability of the steels to absorb high levels of impact energy. As to carbon, if toughness characteristics are not to be needlessly sacrificed this element should not be present in amounts above 0.05 percent and, indeed, should be maintained at significantly lower levels, e.g., below about 0.03 percent or 0.02 percent.
For the purpose of giving those skilled in the art a better understanding of the invention the following illustrative data are given.
A series of 30 pound air-induction melts utilizing electrolytic grade metals as starting materials was prepared. The furnace was first charged with iron and nickel together with about 0.05 percent carbon (carbon boil) for the deoxidation. Thereafter, about 0.1 percent each of aluminum and titanium was added followed by the silicon addition. The heats were cast in dry said double keel block molds, the leg of each keel being 1 inch X Hinches X 7 inches in length. Standard tensile 1 inch) and Charpy V-Notch impact specimens were machined from the keel block and were thereafter solution annealed about one hour at 1900F., air cooled and maraged at about 850F. for about 3 hours. The results of these tests are reported in Tables I and II.
TABLE I Percent Ni C-r Si Al Ti Fe 6 .0 6 .2 1.86 .019 0 .04 0 .07 Bal. 8 .0 8 .2 1.82 0 .008 0 .04 0 .07 Bel. 9.9 10.1 1.77 0.011 0.01 0.03 Bal. 9.0 11.3 1 .88 0.014 0.02 0.02 Bal. 8 .0 10 .1 1.80 0 .021 0 .04 0.07 Bal. 8 .8 11 .9 1.84 0 .012 0 .02 0.03 Bal. 8 .1 12 .1 1.75 0 .013 0 .02 0.03 Ba]. 7 .9 12 .0 0.92 0 .014 0 .02 0 .02 Bal. 8.0 12.1 2.32 0.008 0.03 0.06 Ba]. 7.9 12.2 2.77 0.025 0.02 0.04 Bal.
TABLE II Y.S.,* U.T.S E1ong., R.A., CVN, Alloy k.s 1 k.s 1 percent percent ft.-lbs.
"=0.2% offset.
Concerning the above data, the effect of either low nickel and/or chromium will be observed from a pcrusal of Alloys A and B. The relatively low impact strength of these alloys is in marked contrast to those in accordance with the invention as manifested by Alloys 1 through 8. Alloys 1 and 2 offered a particularly good combination of strength plus toughness. Thus, alloys containing from about 10 to 12 percent chromium, 8.5 to 10 percent nickel and about 1.8 to 2.3 percent silicon are exceptionally good.
Tests were also conducted in which Armco iron, ferrochromium and ferrosilicon were employed rather than the ultra pure electrolytic grades of iron, chromium and silicon used in connection with Table I.
These tests were performed in much the same manner as described in connection with the alloys of Table I, the compositions (Alloys 9 and 10 are within and C and D are without the invention) and results being given in Tables III and IV, respectively.
The data set forth in Tables III and IV indicate that the use of exceptionally pure materials is not necessary. Alloy C confirms that significantly lower levels of nickel (5 percent) subvert resistance to impact. Alloy 10 reflects that as the nickel content is increased above 9 percent in these less pure materials, impact resistance is not benefitted. The low strength of Alloy D is deemed attributable to retained austenite. From overall considerations it is preferred to maintain the nickel content at not more than 9 percent regardless of silicon content.
A number of alloys given in Table l were also exposed to corrosion tests. In this regard, panels of the maraged steels (about 1 inch X 4 inches X %inch thick) were exposed to the well-known Salt Spray (Fog) Test in accordance with ASTM designation B1 17-61. Upon examination of the panels, they were re-tested in the more severe Copper-Accelerated Acetic Acid-salt Spray (CASS) test (ASTM designation B368-61T). Since both of these tests are generally well-known by those skilled in the art, a detailed description is omitted but is described in Specifications and Tests for Electro-deposited Metallic Coatings. ASTM Philadelphia 1961, 3rd ed. In any case, the results of the corrosion tests indicated that the low chromium Alloys A and B were much inferior, with variation in the silicon content seemingly having little effect.
Foundry characteristics were evaluated by pouring dry sand mold fluidity spirals at three different pouring temperatures, 2950F., 2850F. and 2775F. The steel used nominally contained 11.5 percent chromium, 8.5 percent nickel and 2 percent silicon, the balance being essentially iron. The resulting spiral lengths were 35 inches, 31 inches and 17 inches,-respectively. Each of the spirals exhibited good mold filling capability. The freezing temperature of the steel was approximately 2600F. Accordingly, in view of the pouring temperature and degree of super-heat, the fluidity measurements indicated that the castability of the subject steels would be at least as good as if perhaps not better than standard cast CF-8 stainless steel.
As indicated above herein manganese exerts a detrimental influence with regard to steels of the present invention. This is illustrated by the impact data given in .the following Table V.
TABLE V Percent CVN, Alloy Ni Cr Si 0 Al Ti Mn ft. lbs.
The cast steels of the present invention can be utilized for such applications as wearing rings, compressor wheels, corrosion resistant gears, high pressure valves, propellers, components for power plant pumps, including impellers, stage pieces, diffusers, etc., and for applications generally requiring steels which manifest a good combination of corrosion resistance, strength and toughness.
While the steels above described have been set forth solely in connection with applications as cast steels they also are useful in the wrought form. In this connection, if used in the wrought condition, the nickel content can be lowered to 5.5 percent or even 5 percent and the chromium content can be extended up to 15 percent, the sum of the chromium and nickel being less than 22 percent. This obtains over the full silicon range.
It is to be understood that the expressions balance or balance essentially used in referring to the iron content of the steels in accordance herewith, are not intended to exclude the presence of other elements, e.g., deoxidizing and cleansing constituents, and impurities normally associated therewith, in small amounts which do not adversely affect the basic characteristics of the subject steels.
Although the present invention has been described in conjunction with preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that modifications and variations may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, as those skilled in the art will readily understand. Such modifications and variations are considered to be within the purview and scope of the invention and appended claims.
I claim:
1. A maraging stainless steel in the cast and martensitic condition consisting essentially of from about percent to about 12.5 percent chromium, about 7.5 percent to about 11 percent nickel, the sum of the chromium plus nickel being at least about 18 percent but less than 22 percent, about 1.5 percent to about 3 percent silicon, metal from the group consisting of titanium and aluminum in a small but effective amount sufficient to enhance the toughness of the steel, the titanium and aluminum not exceeding about 0.2 percent each, up to about 1 percent manganese, up to 0.05 percent carbon and the balance iron.
2. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing from about 11 percent to about 12 percent chromium.
3. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing from about 8 percent to about 10 percent nickel.
4. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 in which the sum of the nickel plus chromium does not exceed 21.5
to 2.5 percent silicon.
6. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 in which aluminum is present in an amount from about 0.01 percent to about 0.1 percent.
7. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 in which titanium is present in an amount of from about 0.01 to 0.1 percent.
8. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 0.02 percent to about 0.07 percent each of titanium and aluminum.
9. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 1 1 percent to about 12 percent chromium, about 8.5 to 9.5 percent nickel, the chromium plus nickel being from about 20 to 21.5 percent, about 1.8 percent to about 2.3 percent silicon, up to about 0.5 percent manganese, up to 0.03 percent carbon, and 0.01 to 0.1 percent of titanium and aluminum.
10. An alloy in accordance with claim 9 containing 0.02 to 0.07 percent of both titanium and aluminum.
11. An alloy in accordance wth claim 4 in which the chromium plus nickel is at least 19 percent.
12. An alloy in accordance with claim 11 containing up to 0.03 percent carbon.
13. A maraging steel in the martensitic condition and consisting essentially of about 10 percent to about 15 percent chromium, from 5 to 11 percent nickel, the sum of the chromium plus nickel being at least 18 percent but less than 22 percent, about 0.5 percent to about 3 percent silicon, metal from the groupconsisting of titanium and aluminum in a small but effective amount sufficient to enhance the toughness of the steel, the titanium and aluminum not exceeding about 0.2 percent each, up to about 1 percent manganese, up to 0.5 percent carbon and the balance iron.
14. An alloy in accordance with claim 13 containing 11 to 15 percent chromium, 7.5 to 9.5 percent nickel, 1.8 to 2.3 percent silicon, metal from the group consisting of aluminum up to 0.1 percent and titanium up to 0.1 percent, up to 0.5 percent manganese, and up to 0.03 percent carbon.
15. A cast maraging steel in the martensitic condition and consisting essentially of about 10 percent to about 15 percent chromium, from 5 to l 1 percent nickel, the sum of the chromium plus nickel being at least 18 percent but less than 22 percent, about 0.5 percent to about 3 percent silicon, metal from the group consisting of titanium and aluminum in a small but effective amount sufficient to enhance the toughness of the steel, the titanium and aluminum not exceeding about 0.2 percent each, up to about 1 percent manganese, up to 0.5 percent carbon, and the balance iron.
16. A cast maraging steel in accordance with claim 15 containing from 6.5 percent to about 8 percent nickel and from 0.6 to 1 percent silicon.
17. A cast maraging steel in accordance with claim 16 containing 0.01 to 0.1 percent aluminum and 0.01
to 0.1 percent titanium.

Claims (16)

  1. 2. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing from about 11 percent to about 12 percent chromium.
  2. 3. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing from about 8 percent to about 10 percent nickel.
  3. 4. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 in which the sum of the nickel plus chromium does not exceed 21.5 percent.
  4. 5. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing 1.6 to 2.5 percent silicon.
  5. 6. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 in which aluminum is present in an amount from about 0.01 percent to about 0.1 percent.
  6. 7. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 in which titanium is present in an amount of from about 0.01 to 0.1 percent.
  7. 8. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 0.02 percent to about 0.07 percent each of titanium and aluminum.
  8. 9. An alloy in accordance with claim 1 containing about 11 percent to about 12 percent chromium, about 8.5 to 9.5 percent nickel, the chromium plus nickel being from about 20 to 21.5 percent, about 1.8 percent to about 2.3 percent silicon, up to about 0.5 percent manganese, up to 0.03 percent carbon, and 0.01 to 0.1 percent of titanium and aluminum.
  9. 10. An alloy in accordance with claim 9 containing 0.02 to 0.07 percent of both titanium and aluminum.
  10. 11. An alloy in accordance wth claim 4 in which the chromium plus nickel is at least 19 percent.
  11. 12. An alloy in accordance with claim 11 containing up to 0.03 percent carbon.
  12. 13. A maraging steel in the martensitic condition and consisting essentially of about 10 percent to about 15 percent chromium, from 5 to 11 percent nickel, the sum of the chromium plus nickel being at least 18 percent but less than 22 percent, about 0.5 percent to about 3 percent silicon, metal from the group consisting of titanium and aluminum in a small but effective amount sufficient to enhance the toughness of the steel, the titanium and aluminum not exceeding about 0.2 percent each, up to about 1 percent manganese, up to 0.5 percent carbon and the balance iron.
  13. 14. An alloy in accordance with claim 13 containing 11 to 15 percent chromium, 7.5 to 9.5 percent nickel, 1.8 to 2.3 percent silicon, metal from the group consisting of aluminum up to 0.1 percent and titanium up to 0.1 percent, up to 0.5 percent manganese, and up to 0.03 percent carbon.
  14. 15. A cast maraging steel in the martensitic condition and consisting essentially of about 10 percent to about 15 percent chromium, from 5 to 11 percent nickel, the sum of the chromium plus nickel being at least 18 percent but less than 22 percent, about 0.5 percent to about 3 percent silicon, metal from the group consisting of titanium and aluminum in a small but effective amount sufficient to enhance the toughness of the steel, the titanium and aluminum not exceeding about 0.2 percent each, up to about 1 percent manganese, up to 0.5 percent carbon, and the balance iron.
  15. 16. A cast maraging steel in accordance with claim 15 containing from 6.5 percent to about 8 percent nickel and from 0.6 to 1 percent silicon.
  16. 17. A cast maraging steel in accordance with claim 16 containing 0.01 to 0.1 percent aluminum and 0.01 to 0.1 percent titanium.
US00181234A 1971-02-17 1971-09-16 Maraging stainless steel particularly for use in cast condition Expired - Lifetime US3767389A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP725671 1971-02-17
JP725771A JPS5341335B1 (en) 1971-02-17 1971-02-17
JP3654071 1971-05-26
US18123471A 1971-09-16 1971-09-16

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3767389A true US3767389A (en) 1973-10-23

Family

ID=27454685

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US00181234A Expired - Lifetime US3767389A (en) 1971-02-17 1971-09-16 Maraging stainless steel particularly for use in cast condition
US00226038A Expired - Lifetime US3767889A (en) 1971-02-17 1972-02-14 Method of making intercell connections in storage battery

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US00226038A Expired - Lifetime US3767889A (en) 1971-02-17 1972-02-14 Method of making intercell connections in storage battery

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (2) US3767389A (en)
DE (1) DE2206894C3 (en)
FR (1) FR2125519B1 (en)
GB (1) GB1370051A (en)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3967036A (en) * 1974-07-11 1976-06-29 The International Nickel Company, Inc. Flux-coated arc welding electrode
US4041274A (en) * 1974-07-11 1977-08-09 The International Nickel Company, Inc. Maraging stainless steel welding electrode
US4042226A (en) * 1975-05-19 1977-08-16 Midrex Corporation Method and apparatus for producing metallic iron pellets
US20060081309A1 (en) * 2003-04-08 2006-04-20 Gainsmart Group Limited Ultra-high strength weathering steel and method for making same
US20070095804A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-03 Roto Frank Of America, Inc. Method for fabricating helical gears from pre-hardened flat steel stock

Families Citing this family (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2317951C3 (en) * 1973-05-08 1975-10-23 Yuasa Battery Co. Ltd., Takatsuki, Osaka (Japan) Method for producing a block battery
US3908741A (en) * 1974-01-21 1975-09-30 Gould Inc Method for minimizing oxidation in positive displacement casting
US3908738A (en) * 1974-01-21 1975-09-30 Gould Inc Method of positive displacement bonding of battery components
US3908742A (en) * 1974-01-21 1975-09-30 Gould Inc Apparatus for positive displacement bonding
US3960602A (en) * 1974-01-21 1976-06-01 Gould Inc. Intercell connector assembly for positive displacement casting system
US3909301A (en) * 1974-01-21 1975-09-30 Gould Inc Positive displacement bonding
US3934782A (en) * 1974-01-21 1976-01-27 Gould Inc. Method and apparatus for locating and locking onto workpieces in positive displacement casting
US3908743A (en) * 1974-01-21 1975-09-30 Gould Inc Positive displacement casting system employing shaped electrode for effecting cosmetically perfect bonds
US3908739A (en) * 1974-01-21 1975-09-30 Gould Inc Positive displacement casting
US3908740A (en) * 1974-01-21 1975-09-30 Gould Inc Minimizing oxidation in positive displacement casting
JPS50118942A (en) * 1974-03-04 1975-09-18
JPS5832741B2 (en) * 1977-10-06 1983-07-14 松下電器産業株式会社 Connection method between storage battery cells
US4237603A (en) * 1977-11-14 1980-12-09 General Motors Corporation Method for assembling a terminal to a battery side wall
US4177551A (en) * 1978-09-21 1979-12-11 General Motors Corporation Method of welding a arc battery intercell connector
SE452528B (en) * 1984-10-29 1987-11-30 Sab Nife Ab DEVICE FOR AN ELECTROCHEMICAL ACCUMULATOR BATTERY FOR SEALING PUTTING A SCREW CONNECTOR FOR ELECTRICAL CONNECTION THROUGH A CELL WALL OPENING
US4661668A (en) * 1985-10-01 1987-04-28 The Taylor-Winfield Corporation Welding intercell connections by induction heating
US4642442A (en) * 1985-10-17 1987-02-10 The Taylor-Winfield Corporation Battery intercell connection by induction heating
US4742611A (en) * 1987-06-29 1988-05-10 General Motors Corporation Battery assembly process and apparatus
JP2007014163A (en) * 2005-07-01 2007-01-18 Fujitsu Ltd Charging ic, charger and electronic apparatus
US7635537B2 (en) * 2005-07-05 2009-12-22 Concorde Battery Corporation Lead-acid storage batteries with lightweight connectors

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2505763A (en) * 1946-09-06 1950-05-02 Armco Steel Corp Stainless steel and method
US2738267A (en) * 1951-06-14 1956-03-13 United States Steel Corp Hardenable stainless steel
US2801916A (en) * 1954-08-24 1957-08-06 Jessop William & Sons Ltd Ferrous alloys for high temperature use
US2820708A (en) * 1955-05-17 1958-01-21 Armco Steel Corp Stainless steel and method of producing same
US3152934A (en) * 1962-10-03 1964-10-13 Allegheny Ludlum Steel Process for treating austenite stainless steels
US3251683A (en) * 1962-01-16 1966-05-17 Allegheny Ludlum Steel Martensitic steel
US3278298A (en) * 1963-12-31 1966-10-11 Armco Steel Corp Chromium-nickel-aluminum steel and method
US3532491A (en) * 1966-08-25 1970-10-06 Int Nickel Co Maraging steel suitable for heavy section applications

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2862099A (en) * 1957-06-17 1958-11-25 Union Carbide Corp Arc torch process with reactive gases
US2960594A (en) * 1958-06-30 1960-11-15 Plasma Flame Corp Plasma flame generator
GB869763A (en) * 1959-01-12 1961-06-07 Chloride Batteries Ltd Improvements relating to lead-acid electric accumulators
US3336164A (en) * 1965-02-23 1967-08-15 Gould National Batteries Inc Storage battery intercell connectors
US3313658A (en) * 1965-09-16 1967-04-11 Globe Union Inc Storage battery construction
US3526746A (en) * 1966-10-06 1970-09-01 Lockheed Aircraft Corp Gas-shielded arc-riveting tool

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2505763A (en) * 1946-09-06 1950-05-02 Armco Steel Corp Stainless steel and method
US2738267A (en) * 1951-06-14 1956-03-13 United States Steel Corp Hardenable stainless steel
US2801916A (en) * 1954-08-24 1957-08-06 Jessop William & Sons Ltd Ferrous alloys for high temperature use
US2820708A (en) * 1955-05-17 1958-01-21 Armco Steel Corp Stainless steel and method of producing same
US3251683A (en) * 1962-01-16 1966-05-17 Allegheny Ludlum Steel Martensitic steel
US3152934A (en) * 1962-10-03 1964-10-13 Allegheny Ludlum Steel Process for treating austenite stainless steels
US3278298A (en) * 1963-12-31 1966-10-11 Armco Steel Corp Chromium-nickel-aluminum steel and method
US3532491A (en) * 1966-08-25 1970-10-06 Int Nickel Co Maraging steel suitable for heavy section applications

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3967036A (en) * 1974-07-11 1976-06-29 The International Nickel Company, Inc. Flux-coated arc welding electrode
US4041274A (en) * 1974-07-11 1977-08-09 The International Nickel Company, Inc. Maraging stainless steel welding electrode
US4042226A (en) * 1975-05-19 1977-08-16 Midrex Corporation Method and apparatus for producing metallic iron pellets
US20060081309A1 (en) * 2003-04-08 2006-04-20 Gainsmart Group Limited Ultra-high strength weathering steel and method for making same
US20070095804A1 (en) * 2005-10-31 2007-05-03 Roto Frank Of America, Inc. Method for fabricating helical gears from pre-hardened flat steel stock
US7807945B2 (en) * 2005-10-31 2010-10-05 Roto Frank Of America, Inc. Method for fabricating helical gears from pre-hardened flat steel stock

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FR2125519B1 (en) 1977-04-01
US3767889A (en) 1973-10-23
DE2206894C3 (en) 1974-11-28
DE2206894A1 (en) 1973-05-17
DE2206894B2 (en) 1974-05-02
GB1370051A (en) 1974-10-09
FR2125519A1 (en) 1972-09-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US3767389A (en) Maraging stainless steel particularly for use in cast condition
US5298093A (en) Duplex stainless steel having improved strength and corrosion resistance
US3969109A (en) Oxidation and sulfidation resistant austenitic stainless steel
EP0016225B2 (en) Use of an austenitic steel in oxidizing conditions at high temperature
CA1091477A (en) Austenitic stainless steel
US4086085A (en) Austenitic iron alloys
US4043807A (en) Alloy steels
JPS58217662A (en) High strength and high corrosion resistant boiler tube having resistance against brittlement during use
JPS5929105B2 (en) Fe-based alloy with excellent molten zinc corrosion resistance
US3833358A (en) Refractory iron-base alloy resisting to high temperatures
US3925064A (en) High corrosion fatigue strength stainless steel
KR20010083939A (en) Cr-mn-ni-cu austenitic stainless steel
JPS6119767A (en) Austenite stainless steel for low temperature
JPH055161A (en) Austenitic heat resistant cast steel excellent in high temperature strength and exhaust system part made thereof
US3485683A (en) Method of heat treating a ductile austenitic ductile iron casting including refrigeration treatment and article produced thereby
US3650731A (en) Ferritic stainless steel
US3055755A (en) Austenitic ductile iron having high notch ductility at low temperature
JPS5938365A (en) Heat-resistant cast steel
US3697258A (en) Highly corrosion resistant maraging stainless steel
JPS60100640A (en) High-chromium alloy having excellent resistance to heat and corrosion
JPH04235256A (en) Ferritic stainless steel excellent in condensed water corrosion resistance and low in yield strength
US3364013A (en) Stainless steel alloy
JPS6046353A (en) Heat resistant steel
JPS6147900B2 (en)
US1932840A (en) Aluminum alloys