US3202474A - Process for crosslinking cellulose with formaldehyde adducts of divinyl sulfone - Google Patents

Description

United States Patent El Welsh Sta cs Agricuitus No Drawing.

.lan. 23, E62, Ser. No. 168,288 A as 1 (Si. 8-1233) {uranted under This 35, US. tlode {1952), see. 266) A non-exclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free license in the invention herein described, throughout the World for all purposes of the United States Government, with the power to grant sublicenses for such purposes, is hereby granted to the Government of the United Sta es of America.

This invention relates to the preparation of novel addition products of divinyl sulione with formaldehyde, and the application of such products to cellulose to produce novel crosslinked and partially etherilied cellulose. An object of the invention is to prepare cellulosic mate rials, particularly cehulosic textiles, having durable Wrinkle resistance and increased resistance to shrinkage and stretching. A second object is to provide a method of treating cellulosic textiles in which method the odor and inhalation toxicity problems associated with the use of free divinyl sulfone are eliminated. Other objects will be apparent from the description which follows.

lt is well known that formaldehyde in aqueous solution exists as a series of hydrates or" the structure HO(CH 0),,H Where n is in the range 1-3 for most of the solute (ll. F. Walker, Formaldehyde, Reinhold Publishing Corporation, 1953, pp. 4755). In the hydrate form, formaldehyde is a weal; acid and reacts with alkalies to form salts (Walker, p. l789} which may serve as intermediates in a number of reactions. In the present invention it is shown that excess aqueous formaldehyde reacts with divinyl sulfone in the presence alkaline catalysts, denoted by X, in the following manner:

The adducts formed in this reaction are but slightly soluble in Water. All the adducts obtained in these reactions are found to be reactive toward cellulose and are useful in introducing crosslinks. Solutions of the Watersoluble types of adducts may be freed of any divinyl sulfone odor by extraction of traces of unreacted divinyl sulfone with a Water-immiscible inert solvent such as benzene. The sparingly Water-soluble type of adduct may be freed of divinyl sulfone odor by extraction of any unreacted divinyl sulfone With water.

Catalysts suitable for preparation of these adducts are soluble bases such as alkali metal hydroxides and carbonates, alkaline earth ietal hydroxides, organic quaternary ammonium hydroxides and carbonates, and tertiary aliphatic amines. Bases considerably stronger than alkali metal carbonates have the disadvantage, however, of accelerating even at moderate temperatures the reaction of divinyl sulfone with Water which may be present,

asserts l Patented Aug. 2 2:, 1965 thus decreasing the yield of the formaldehyde-divinyl sulfone adducts.

The reaction of formaldehyde and divinyl sulfone is ad vantageously carried out in solution and preferably in aqueous solution, using catalyst concentrations below 5 and temperatures of 20460 C. The rate of reaction Will vary with the particular catalyst present and its concentration, as Well as the concentrations of formaldehyde and divinyl sulfone. At low catalyst concentrations, Warming is required to initiate the reaction. However, the reaction is exothermic once it is initiated, and proceeds quite rapidly at temperatures below those required for reaction of divinyl sulfone with Water.

The application of the highly Water-soluble type of adduct to cellulose is simple and rapid. The solution obtained in preparing the adduct is diluted to the strength desired, an alkaline catalyst is added if that already present is too dilute, and the solution is applied to cellulose in the form of fiber, yarn, or fabric. The cellulose is then kept for 0.5-30 minutes at temperatures ranging from 20l70 C., the optimum temperature depending upon the type and concentration of catalyst used. Catalysts suitable for the application of the adducts to cellulose are alkali metal hydroxides, carbonates and bicarbonates, alkaline earth metal hydroxides and organic quaternary ammonium hydroxides, carbonates and bicarbonates. Although catalyst concentrations of 01-30% may be used, concentrations of 1-3% are preferred When curing at -l60 (3., and under these conditions, curing is complete in 0.5-5 minutes.

The application to cellulose of the sparingly Watersoluble type of adduct described above may be carried out by dissolving the adduct in an inert wateriiscible volatile organic solvent and diluting the latter with Water to the desired concentration, followed by addition of catalyst and curing as With the highly Water-soluble types of adducts.

A further variation in the process of this invention is the application to cellulose of a mixture of divinyl sulfone, formaldehyde, and an alkaline catalyst in an inert volatile solvent such as water, followed by curing in the manner described for the preformed adducts. The

catalyst concentration is kept at or below 3% so that the formaldehyde and divinyl sulfone do not react at room temperature. The catalysts suitable for this method are the same as those used in applying the preformed adducts to cellulose. While this variation has the disadvantage that the treating solution retains the irritating and lachrymatory odor of divinyl sulfone, it resembles the other methods in giving a higher eificiency of reaction with cellulose than is obtained in the absence of the formaldehyde.

The formation of crosslinks in cellulosic materials treated by the processes of this invent-ion is evidenced not only by enhanced Wrinkle resistance and other forms of dimensional stability, but also by insolubility of the treated fibers in cuprammonium hydroxide or cupriethylenediamine solution. While it is believed that the adducts, particularly those of sparingly Water-soluble type, are capable of acting directly as crosslinking agents, it is also possible that the adducts undergo partial dissociation under the curing conditions used, to generate appreciable amounts of divinyl sulfone in situ. This su-lfone also is a highly effective crosslinking agent.

An unexpected feature of cellulo'sic fabrics treated by the processes of this invention is the fact that both their tensile strength and their wrinkle resistance in the Wet state can be further increased by subsequent mercerization with aqueous sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide at concentrations of 1735%. The great durability of the finishes described herein is also demonstrated by the used for crease recovery tests in the wet state. tester was used for warp breaking strength determinations.

fact that they withstand treatment with such strong alkalies. i

which they were again washed, dried and equilibrated. The properties of the treated fabrics were as follows:

The following examples illustrate the preparation and application to cellulose of adducts formed by divinyl ,sulfone with formaldehyde at varying mole ratios of the two reactants. Crease recovery angles citediare double the values measured in the warp direction by the Monsanto crease recovery test. The adaptation of Lawrence and Phillips, Am. Dyestufii' Reptr., 45, p. 548 1956), was A Scott The fabric used was desized, scoured and bleached 80 X 80 cotton print cloth.

Example 1 A solution of' formaldehyde-divinyl sulfone adduct (highly soluble type) was prepared as follows: to 10 ml.

(0.1 mole) of divinyl sulfone in 25 m1. of water was added ml. of 40% aqueous formaldehyde (0.2 mole) ture was warmed to 40 C. with stirring. A mildly exothermic reaction began and the temperature gradually rose to 50 C. even though heating had been removed. After 15 minutes longer, the temperature began to fall.

The mixture was kept at 50 for 15 minutes more and then allowedto stand for one hour. It was shaken with three ml. portions of benzene to remove traces of ,divinyl sulfone; There was obtained 44 .ml. of adduct .solution having a concentration of about In a control experiment in which 10 ml. of divinyl suljifone was heated with 40 ml. of water and-1 g. of sodium carbonate monohydrate in the absence of formaldehyde,

no reaction occurred until the temperature was raised to 90, whereupon an'insoluble polymer separated. This shows that the reaction of divinyl sulfone with formaldehyde leads to a diflerent adduct than does the reaction of divinyl .sulfone with water.

Example 2 The adduct solution of Example 1 was applied to print ,cloth in the following way: the solution, which already contained sufficient sodium carbonate to serve as a catalyst, was applied in one dip and one nip to the fabric,

;the pressure of the wringer rolls being adjusted to give a -wet pickup of 125 The fabric was oven-cured at a specified temperature for 5 minutes. It was washed thor- Io'ughly in both cold and hot water, heat driedand air 'and 1.0 g. of sodium carbonate monohydrate. The mix- 7 equilibrat'ed to constant moisture content. Samples of V the treated fabric were subsequently mercerized by being .soaked in 20% sodium hydroxide for 5 minutes, after "of sodium carbonate mono-hydrate.

'ainequilibrated.

The adduct preparation of Example 1 was repeated using 10 ml. (0.1 mole) of divinyl sulfone, 7.6 ml. (0.1 mole) of 40% formaldehyde, 30 ml. of water and 1.00 g.

The exothermic reaction was carried out at 4055 C. as before. After the usual benzene extractions, there was obtained 43 ml. of

a solution containing about 25% by weight of adduct.

7 Example4 W The adduct solution of Example 3 was diluted with three volumes of water, and'base-d on the total solution, 1.85% by weight of sodium bicarbonate was added. .The

solution was applied to print cloth in one clip and one nip to a wet pickup of 113%. The fabric was oven-cured at 135 C. for 5 minutes. It was washed, heat-dried and weight of 5%, a sulfur content of 0.80%, a crease recovery'angle of 283 wet and 255 dry, and a breaking strength loss of 45%.

Example 5 The adduct preparation of Example 1 was repeated -using 10 ml. (0.1niole) of divinyl's ulfone, 5.7 ml. (0.075

mole) of 40% formaldehyde, 30 ml. of water and 1.00 g. of sodium carbonate monohydrate. The exothermic re action was carried out at 45-55 C., as before. The reaction mixture was shaken with 20 ml. of benzene, causing *three liquid layers to form. The two denser layers were added to 30 ml. of water and 0.35 ml. of glacial acetic acid, bringing the pH to 8. Then 1.35 g. of sodium bicarbonate and 20 ml. of tetrahydrofur-an wereadded, giving ml. of a homogeneoussolution containing the adduct .in a concentnation of about 15% Evaporation of thebenzene extract gave only'0.-3 g. of .divinyl sulfone, showing practically all of the divinyl sulfone had reacted with formaldehyde.

7 Example 6 The adduct solution of Example 5 was diluted to a specified strength, and a specified amount of extra sodium bicarbonate was added to compensate for dilution ofcata- ,lyst already present.

The solution;was then applied to vprint cloth in one dip and one nip to a wet pickup of 1113-1l8%, and the'cloth was cured at C. for 5 minglltCS. The cloth was subsequently washed, oven-dried, and

air-equilibrated. The fabric properties were as follows:

i Crease Extra Weight Recovery, Strength Adduct Concentration NaHCO Gain, Percent Degrees Loss,

- Percent Percent Sulfur Percent Wet Dry 1 Compared at constant thread count.

The treated cloth showed a gain in Untreated fabric showed crease recovery angles of 160 wet and 157 dry.

Example 7 The a-dduct preparation of Example 1 was repeated using ml. (0.1 mole) of divinyl sulfone, 3.8 ml. (0.05 mole) of 40% formaldehyde, ml. of water and 1.00 g. of sodium carbonate monohy-d-rate. The exothermic reaction was carried out at 50 C. in the usual way. Two liquid phases separated. The addition of 20 ml. of tetrahydrofuran and 30 ml. of water gave ml. of homogeneous solution containing the adduct in a concentration of about 12%.

Example 8 To the adduct solution of Example 7 was added 8% by volume of tetra'hydrofuran and 1% by weight of sodium carbonate. The solution was applied to print cloth in one dip and one nip to a wet pickup of 112%, and the cloth was cured at C. for 5 minutes. The cloth was subsequently washed, oven-dried and air-equilibrated. The fabric properties were as follows: weight gain8%, sulfur content-1.21%, Wet crease recovery278, dry crease recovery-241, breaking strength loss40%. Untreated fabric showed crease recovery angles of Wet and 157 dry.

Example 9 Print cloth was soaked in a solution containing 5 ml. (0.06 mole) of 36% aqueous formaldehyde, 2.0 ml. (0.02 mole) of divinyl sulfone and 0.25 g. of sodium carbonate in 15 ml. of water at room temperature. The fabric was then oven-cured at 135 C. for 10 minutes, and was subsequently washed, dried and air-equilibrated. It showed a weight increase of 10% and had high wrinkle resistance in both the wet and dry states.

The same experiment carried out in the absence of formaldehyde gave fabric having a weight increase of 6%. The experiment conducted with formaldehyde present but divinyl sulfone absent gave a weight increase of only 0.9%.

I claim:

1. A process for crosslinking cellulose which comprises Wetting the cellulose with a solution in an inert volatile solvent of an alkaline catalyst together with an addition product previously formed by the base-catalyzed reaction of formaldehyde with diviny-l sulfone, the wetted cellulose subsequently being kept at 20- C. for from 0.5 to 30 minutes, resulting in a treated cellulose which in the form of fabric exhibits increased wrinkle resistance and enhanced dimensional stability.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein the crosslinked cellulose is aftermercerized.

3. A process for crosslinking cellulose which comprises Wetting the cellulose with a solution of formaldehyde, divinyl sulfone and an alkaline catalyst in an inert, volatile solvent, the wetted cellulose subsequently being kept at 20-170 C. for from 0.5 to 30 minutes, resulting in a treated cellulose which in [the form of fabric exhibits increased wrinkle resistance and enhanced dimensional stability, and also resulting in a greater reaction efiiciency than would otherwise be obtained Without the presence of formaldehyde.

4. The process of claim 3 wherein the crosslinked cellulose is aftermercerized.

References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,470,077 5/49 'Fincke 260-607 2,524,399 10/50 Schoene et a1. 81 16 2,573,580 10/51 Ladd 260607 2,878,294 3/59 Kress.

2,988,417 6/61 Emmons 81'16 3,068, 123 12/ -62 Feldmann.

OTHER REFERENCES Reinhardt et al.: American Dyestulf Reporter, vol. 47, pp. 758-764 (1-958).

Tripp et al.: Textile Research Journal, vol. 28, pp. 404- 417 (-8).

Welch et al.: Textile Research Journal, vol. 31, pp. 84- 86 1961).

NORMAN G. TORCHIN, Primary Examiner. ABRAHAM H. WINKELSTEIN, Examiner.

Claims (1)

1. A PROCESS FOR CROSSLINKING CELLULOSE WHICH COMPRISES WETTING THE CELLULOSE WITH A SOLUTION IN AN INERT VOLATILE SOLVENT OF AN ALKALINE CATALYST TOGETHER WITH AN ADDITION PRODUCT PREVIOUSLY FORMED BY THE BASE-CATALYZED REACTION OF FORMALDEHYDE WITH DIVINYL SULFONE, THE WETTED CELLULOSE SUBSEQUENTLY BEING KEPT AT 20-170*C. FOR FROM 0.5 TO 30 MINUTES, RESULTING IN A TEATED CELLULOSE WHICH IN THE FORM OF FABRIC EXHIBITS INCREASED WRINKLE RESISTANCE AND ENHANCED DIMENSIONAL STABILITY.