Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

US3180785A - Synthetic fibers with increased surface friction - Google Patents

Synthetic fibers with increased surface friction Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US3180785A
US3180785A US181354A US18135462A US3180785A US 3180785 A US3180785 A US 3180785A US 181354 A US181354 A US 181354A US 18135462 A US18135462 A US 18135462A US 3180785 A US3180785 A US 3180785A
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
fiber
fibers
strength
batt
array
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
US181354A
Inventor
Thompson Hugh Brian
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kendall Co
Original Assignee
Kendall Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kendall Co filed Critical Kendall Co
Priority to US181354A priority Critical patent/US3180785A/en
Priority to US348319A priority patent/US3221090A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US3180785A publication Critical patent/US3180785A/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D04BRAIDING; LACE-MAKING; KNITTING; TRIMMINGS; NON-WOVEN FABRICS
    • D04HMAKING TEXTILE FABRICS, e.g. FROM FIBRES OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL; FABRICS MADE BY SUCH PROCESSES OR APPARATUS, e.g. FELTS, NON-WOVEN FABRICS; COTTON-WOOL; WADDING ; NON-WOVEN FABRICS FROM STAPLE FIBRES, FILAMENTS OR YARNS, BONDED WITH AT LEAST ONE WEB-LIKE MATERIAL DURING THEIR CONSOLIDATION
    • D04H1/00Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres
    • D04H1/04Non-woven fabrics formed wholly or mainly of staple fibres or like relatively short fibres from fleeces or layers composed of fibres having existing or potential cohesive properties, e.g. natural fibres, prestretched or fibrillated artificial fibres
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/249921Web or sheet containing structurally defined element or component
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/29Coated or structually defined flake, particle, cell, strand, strand portion, rod, filament, macroscopic fiber or mass thereof
    • Y10T428/2913Rod, strand, filament or fiber
    • Y10T428/2973Particular cross section
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T428/00Stock material or miscellaneous articles
    • Y10T428/29Coated or structually defined flake, particle, cell, strand, strand portion, rod, filament, macroscopic fiber or mass thereof
    • Y10T428/2913Rod, strand, filament or fiber
    • Y10T428/2973Particular cross section
    • Y10T428/2978Surface characteristic

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a method for enhancing the strength of fibrous arrays comprising certain synthet1c fibers, and the product thereof.
  • Non-woven fabrics produced from synthetic fibers, particularly of the polyester type are increasingly important articles of commerce, especially in the form of lightly felted batts or arrays which may be compressed to a feltlike consistency, usually with the accompaniment of a certain degree of needling, punching, or other processing for entangling, bonding, or intermeshing the fibers into a unitary, coherent structure.
  • Non-woven fabrics of this type are finding increasing usage in the interlining field, as well as in electrical and other industrial fields.
  • non-woven fabrics of synthetic fibers may be utilized, however, is definitely limited by the low strength which characterizes prior art non- Wovens of this type.
  • non-woven fabrics derived from a given Weight of fiber are very much lower in tensile strength than woven fabrics derived from the same weight of staple fiber.
  • the process of spinning and twisting the fibers into yarns brings inter-fiber frictional forces into play, which greatly enhance the strength of the fabric woven from such yarns.
  • an applied load is distributed simultaneously over a large number of fibers, whereas in a non-woven fabric the cooperative contact between fibers is of a low order of magnitude, and the potential strength of the fibers is not realized since they react to stress almost singly and independently.
  • the elements of this invention are based on considerations of and means for enhancing the fiber-tofiber friction of fibrous arrays, without adding foreign substances or shrinking the fibers to the extent that the density, compactness or conformability of the array become objectionable.
  • my process is applicable to a fibrous array, such as a needled batt of polyethylene terephthalate fibers, and operates so as to impart to such a batt a 10 to 20 fold increase in strength without substantial shrinkage, and without surrendering to any significant degree the desirable properties of softness, flexibility, porosity, etc., associated with what I term fiber freedom.
  • FIGURE 1 is a representation of a portion of the length of a commercial synthetic fiber.
  • FIGURE 2 is a representation of the same portion of fiber after treatment according to this invention, showing crystals 12, derived from the body of the fiber 10, the crystals being adherent to and lying on the surface of the fiber, and being in the general nature of sharp-edged flat prisms.
  • this can increase the inter-fiber friction to such an extent that a heat-treated needled felt made from suitable fibers may have a tensile a strength 20 times the strength of an identical needled felt before heat treatment.
  • a foreign material no matter how finely divided, can rarely be so dispersed that it is distributed over the fiber surface with maximum efficiency.
  • the addition of foreign friction-enhancing agents from an external phase, onto the fiber surface will always remain a different process from the promotion, from within the fiber substance, of crystalline growths which grow outwardly from the fiber surface in the formof rough protuberances.
  • the protuberances are of the same basic chemical composition as the main body of the fiber, so that questions of specific adhesion do not arise, nor is a foreign chemical identity added to the fiber system.
  • the fiber-to-fiber frictional enhancement of this invention differs from the results obtained by etching fiber surfaces. or partial-dissolution process, highly irregular areas are dug away or eaten away from the fiber surface. This is a subtractive effect, wasteful of fiber substance, and always accompanied by a decided degree of fiber weakening, from the very nature of the process.
  • this invention is applicable to a wide variety of fibrous arrays including card webs, needled batts, bonded non-woven fabrics, roving, and other fibrous aggregates wherein the surface friction of fiber against fiber constitutes one of the main elements in the strength of the product. It is also applicable to fabrics made from low twist or zero twist yarns, which may be strengthened for the weaving process by use of a sizing agent which may be subsequently removed prior to or during the practice of my invention on such fabrics. The increased strength shown by the process of this invention will vary with the geometry of the fibrous array in question.
  • the fibers are normally in engagement only along a small fraction of their length, since the density of such material is very low, being only about 1% of the density of the fiber substance. Under such circumstances, as illustrated in Example I, the fibers make little contact with each other, and the strength increase shown by the practice of this invention, though useful, is only about 100%.
  • the treatment of my invention produces only moderate strength increases in In an etching fibrous arrays previously bonded by the use of thermoplastic fibers.
  • the principal source of strength is the bond between the thermoplastic fibers and the non-binder fibers, which is so high as to obscure the effect of slippage between non-binder fibers.
  • Such bonded webs are, of course, much less flexible and conformable than needled batts of the same composition.
  • Example I A quantity of 3 denier 1 /2 inch polyethylene terephthalate fiber of the type known commercially as Dacron 54 (E. I. du Pont Company) was carded on conventional textile carding equipment to form an assembly of superimposed webs weighing 183 grams per square yard. To increase the fiber-to-fiber contact of this rather fluffy assembly, the assembly of webs was passed through a cold textile calender at a pressure of 200 pounds per inch of nip, to form a compressed batt.
  • Dacron 54 E. I. du Pont Company
  • Inch-wide strips were cut from this batt and measured in an Instron tensile tester using 3-inch jaws 3 inches apart moving at 5 inches per minute. The tensile strength of the strips averaged 0.332 pound.
  • Example II A quantity of the same fiber used in Example I was carded to form a batt which was passes-d through a needle loom at such a rate as to impose on the batt about 370 penetrations per square inch, the needling process being carried out on both faces of the batt.
  • the needled fibrous array weighed 100 grams per square yard.
  • Tensile strength of inch-wide strips of this material averaged 1.45 pounds, as measured on an Instron tensile tester with 3-inch jaws 3 inches apart, moving at 5 inches per minute.
  • Shrinkage was inconsequential, being less than 15%, and there was no evidence of fiber fusion, or of loss of softness or porosity due to heat treatment.
  • Example III A-blend of 80% Dacron 54 and undrawn polyester fiber of a lower softening point was processed on carding equipment to form a batt weighing grams per square yard. This batt was unified by passing through a 4-roll textile calender heated to 380 F. at which point the 20% of undrawn polyester fiber softens and acts as a binder fiber. The resulting unified sheet was two-thousandths of an inch thick and had a tensile strength of 3.18 pounds per inch-wide strip.
  • the strength of the treated 100% Dacron 54 batt was 20 times the strength of the base needled material; the 75% Dacron-25% rayon blend was increased 15 fold; the 50% Dacron-50% rayon blend was between 9 and 10 fold; and-the 25 Dacron-75% rayon blend was between 4 and 5 fold. This indicates that the strength increase is probably a straight-line function of the Dacron 54 content.
  • the invention is especially adapted to the production of soft, porous, conformable, dimensionally stable fibrous arrays, characterized by a strength which is not attainable by any other process without sacrificing at least some of the desirable properties.
  • a non-woven array consisting at least in part of essentially unretracted and unfused synthetic fibers, said fibers having rough and irregular surfaces characterized by the adherent inclusion on said surfaces of irregularly distributed fiat prismatic crystals of fiber substance of a lower degree of polymerization than the main body of said fiber substance.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Textile Engineering (AREA)
  • Nonwoven Fabrics (AREA)

Description

April 27, 1965 H THOMPSQN 3,180,785
SYNTHETIC FIBERS WITH INCREASED SURFACE FRICTION Filed March 21, 1962 United States Patent 3,180,785 SYNTHETIC FIBERS WITH INCREASED SURFACE FRICTION Hugh Brian Thompson, Milton, Mass., assignor to The Kendall Company, Boston, Mass., a corporation of Massachusetts Filed Mar. 21, 1962, Ser. No. 181,354 4 Claims. (Cl. 161-169) This invention relates to a method for enhancing the strength of fibrous arrays comprising certain synthet1c fibers, and the product thereof.
More particularly it is concerned with a method for substantially increasing the strength of non-woven fabrics prepared from certain polymeric fibers, said fabr cs bemg primarily dependent for their enhanced integrity upon frictional engagement of the fibers.
Non-woven fabrics produced from synthetic fibers, particularly of the polyester type, are increasingly important articles of commerce, especially in the form of lightly felted batts or arrays which may be compressed to a feltlike consistency, usually with the accompaniment of a certain degree of needling, punching, or other processing for entangling, bonding, or intermeshing the fibers into a unitary, coherent structure. Non-woven fabrics of this type are finding increasing usage in the interlining field, as well as in electrical and other industrial fields.
The degree to which such non-woven fabrics of synthetic fibers may be utilized, however, is definitely limited by the low strength which characterizes prior art non- Wovens of this type. In general, non-woven fabrics derived from a given Weight of fiber are very much lower in tensile strength than woven fabrics derived from the same weight of staple fiber. The process of spinning and twisting the fibers into yarns brings inter-fiber frictional forces into play, which greatly enhance the strength of the fabric woven from such yarns. Additionally, in a conventional yarn structure, an applied load is distributed simultaneously over a large number of fibers, whereas in a non-woven fabric the cooperative contact between fibers is of a low order of magnitude, and the potential strength of the fibers is not realized since they react to stress almost singly and independently.
In an effort to enhance the strength of non-woven fabrics, various expedients have been resorted to, such (1) .Saturating fibrous batts with heavy concentrations of bonding agents: This not only adds foreign material to the fibrous array, but has an adverse effect on the desirable properties of softness and flexibility, which are often primary requisites as in the interlining field.
(2) Needle-punching the fibrous batts by repeated passes through a needle-loom: Each pass, however, makes the array more dense and compact, and is in addition uneconomical.
(3) Reinforcing the fibrous batts with yarns or fabrics: This is not only expensive. but it decreases the pliability, conformability, and extensibility of the batt.
(4) Strengthening the batt by using thermoplastic binder fibers, or by mixing the synthetic fibers with naturally feltable fibers, or alternatively by employing certain retractable synthetic fibers in a retracting shrinkage process, as set forth in the patent to Lauterbach, US. 2,910,763: Various other proposals have been made wherein the fiber shrinkage is accompanied by a certain amount of fusion and sticking together of thermosensitive fibers.
Such processes employing fusion and retraction, however, are difiicult to control insofar as they depend on the use of fibers which retract when heated. The retraction of the fibers inevitably results in shrinkage of the Whole assembly, and in a certain degree of densification Patented Apr. 27, 1965 whereby the soft appealing hand of the original fibrous array is to some extent lost or destroyed.
It is an object of this invention to provide a strong nonwoven felt-like array of synthetic fibers which is not characterized by having undergone shrinkage or fiber fusion. It is a further object of this invention to provide a process for substantially increasing the strength of such a felt-like array without substantial retraction or fusion of the synthetic fibers. It is also an object of this invention to provide a process for making a high tensile strength array of fibers which retains essentially all of the softness, drape, and conformability of the unprocessed array.
It is a further object of this invention to provide an array of synthetic fibers characterized by a substantially increased degree of inter-fiber friction, whereby the tensile strength of the array is similarly increased.
These and other objects will be apparent from the following description of the invention.
In general, the elements of this invention are based on considerations of and means for enhancing the fiber-tofiber friction of fibrous arrays, without adding foreign substances or shrinking the fibers to the extent that the density, compactness or conformability of the array become objectionable. In this respect, my process is applicable to a fibrous array, such as a needled batt of polyethylene terephthalate fibers, and operates so as to impart to such a batt a 10 to 20 fold increase in strength without substantial shrinkage, and without surrendering to any significant degree the desirable properties of softness, flexibility, porosity, etc., associated with what I term fiber freedom.
It is known to enhance fiber-to-fiber fricton by the use of colloidal silica or similar materials. However, the presence of added foreign materials is often undesirable, and their efficiency in promoting fiber friction is limited, since they are merely in contact with the fiber surface.
I have found that unexpectedly large-scale increases in fiber-to-fiber friction may be brought about by a heat treatment of certain synthetic polymeric fibers, as typified by fibers made from polyethylene terephthalate. Commercially available fibers of polyethylene terephthalate, such as offered by Du Pont as Dacron 54, or by Celanese as Fortrelle, contain a small amount of lower molecular weight polymeric material which appears to be principally a trimer of the ethylene glycol-terephthalic acid condensation product, in cyclic form. This trimer may be associated with smaller amounts of other oligomers.
Normally, the presence of these lower molecular weight materials in commercial polyester fibers is not obvious or apparent even under microscopic examination at very high magnifications. The lower polymer apparently exists within the body of the fiber, which shows a smooth surface. By exposing the fiber to a heating process, however, I have found that I can cause to appear on the fiber surface'an irregular crystalline growth which clings tenaciously to the fiber surface, converting the fiber profile from an originally relatively smooth, low-friction contour to one which is marked by rough, sharp-edged protuberances. This effect is illustrated in the drawing, wherein FIGURE 1 is a representation of a portion of the length of a commercial synthetic fiber. FIGURE 2 is a representation of the same portion of fiber after treatment according to this invention, showing crystals 12, derived from the body of the fiber 10, the crystals being adherent to and lying on the surface of the fiber, and being in the general nature of sharp-edged flat prisms.
As set forth more fully below, this can increase the inter-fiber friction to such an extent that a heat-treated needled felt made from suitable fibers may have a tensile a strength 20 times the strength of an identical needled felt before heat treatment.
It is not known to me whether the lower molecular weight material, which I will call trimer for convenience, exists in the form of crystals within the body of the unheated polyester fiber, or whether it is disposed in crystallites, or in an amorphous, non-crystalline state of aggregation.
In any case, it appears that the process of this invention yields products which are chemically and physically unique with respect to surface roughness and fiber-to-fiber friction, so far as man-made fibers are concerned. The art of adding foreign crystalline material to fibers, to enhance friction, is known. It is also possible to bond friction-promoting agents to fibers, either by adhesives, or by heating thermosensitive fibers in the presence of such agents, or by swelling certain sensitive fibers and adding foreign material while the fibers are surfacesoftened or surface-swollen. Several considerations make such treatment undesirable, however. No matter what sort of adhesive is used, there is always difficulty in promoting a maximum degree of adhesion of friction-enhancing agent to fiber, since the ideal conditions for specific adhesion between two different chemical species are hard to establish. Second, a foreign material, no matter how finely divided, can rarely be so dispersed that it is distributed over the fiber surface with maximum efficiency. The addition of foreign friction-enhancing agents from an external phase, onto the fiber surface, will always remain a different process from the promotion, from within the fiber substance, of crystalline growths which grow outwardly from the fiber surface in the formof rough protuberances. In the latter case, the protuberances are of the same basic chemical composition as the main body of the fiber, so that questions of specific adhesion do not arise, nor is a foreign chemical identity added to the fiber system.
It should also be appreciated that the fiber-to-fiber frictional enhancement of this invention differs from the results obtained by etching fiber surfaces. or partial-dissolution process, highly irregular areas are dug away or eaten away from the fiber surface. This is a subtractive effect, wasteful of fiber substance, and always accompanied by a decided degree of fiber weakening, from the very nature of the process.
It will be appreciated that this invention is applicable to a wide variety of fibrous arrays including card webs, needled batts, bonded non-woven fabrics, roving, and other fibrous aggregates wherein the surface friction of fiber against fiber constitutes one of the main elements in the strength of the product. It is also applicable to fabrics made from low twist or zero twist yarns, which may be strengthened for the weaving process by use of a sizing agent which may be subsequently removed prior to or during the practice of my invention on such fabrics. The increased strength shown by the process of this invention will vary with the geometry of the fibrous array in question. For example, in an unpressed card fleece, the fibers are normally in engagement only along a small fraction of their length, since the density of such material is very low, being only about 1% of the density of the fiber substance. Under such circumstances, as illustrated in Example I, the fibers make little contact with each other, and the strength increase shown by the practice of this invention, though useful, is only about 100%.
Much higher strength increases, up to twentyfold, are shown by needled batts of suitable fibers, as illustrated by Example II. To some extent, at least, this can be explained by the increased fiber-to-fiber contact shown by needled webs, so that the surface roughness introduced by the process of this invention has a greater chance to take effect.
As illustrated in Example III, the treatment of my invention produces only moderate strength increases in In an etching fibrous arrays previously bonded by the use of thermoplastic fibers. This is not surprising in view of the consideration that in such products, the principal source of strength is the bond between the thermoplastic fibers and the non-binder fibers, which is so high as to obscure the effect of slippage between non-binder fibers. Such bonded webs are, of course, much less flexible and conformable than needled batts of the same composition.
Example I A quantity of 3 denier 1 /2 inch polyethylene terephthalate fiber of the type known commercially as Dacron 54 (E. I. du Pont Company) was carded on conventional textile carding equipment to form an assembly of superimposed webs weighing 183 grams per square yard. To increase the fiber-to-fiber contact of this rather fluffy assembly, the assembly of webs was passed through a cold textile calender at a pressure of 200 pounds per inch of nip, to form a compressed batt.
Inch-wide strips were cut from this batt and measured in an Instron tensile tester using 3-inch jaws 3 inches apart moving at 5 inches per minute. The tensile strength of the strips averaged 0.332 pound.
A part of the rest of the batt was subjected to a temperature of 400 F. in an air-circulating oven for 3 minutes. There was less than 10% shrinkage in the batt, no appreciable change in softness and porosity, and no evidence of fiber fusion or retraction. In a tensile test parallel to that set forth above the heated batt showed a strength of 0.697 pound, an increase of 110%.
Example II A quantity of the same fiber used in Example I was carded to form a batt which was passe-d through a needle loom at such a rate as to impose on the batt about 370 penetrations per square inch, the needling process being carried out on both faces of the batt. The needled fibrous array weighed 100 grams per square yard.
Tensile strength of inch-wide strips of this material averaged 1.45 pounds, as measured on an Instron tensile tester with 3-inch jaws 3 inches apart, moving at 5 inches per minute.
A sample of this needled material was heated at 400 F. for 4 minutes in a circulating air oven. Comparable tensile tests on one-inch wide strips of heated material showed a strength of 26.9 pounds, or between 18 and 19 times the strength of the unheated needled batt.
Shrinkage was inconsequential, being less than 15%, and there was no evidence of fiber fusion, or of loss of softness or porosity due to heat treatment.
In a parallel set of tests, a similarly needled batt was heated to 250 F. for 39 hours, and showed a strength increase of 8.8 fold. Another similar batt heated to 300 F. for 3 hours showed a 12.6 fold increase in strength. For the realization of maximum strength in the shortest time, therefore, I prefer to operate in the neighborhood of 400 F. when processing fibers such as Dacron 54. At temperatures much in excess of 400 F., secondary effects of fiber softening and shrinkage begin to occur, and the strength per unit weight falls off rather rapidly. Additionally, heating to above 400 F. for longer periods seems to sublime the surface crystal deposit off the fiber surface, as'
followed by microscopic examination and tests of tensile strength, which decreases under these conditions.
Although the strength increase shown by treatment at 400 F. for 4 minutes is considerably more than that at 250 F. for 39 hours, this is probably not directly attributable to the higher temperature having caused a higher amount of surface crystal growth. The nature of the growth is important: high temperatures result in numerous small crystals on the fiber surface, while the 250 F. treatment resulted in larger, but fewer, crystals, which might be expected to show a lower degree of enhancement of fiberto-fiber friction.
Example III A-blend of 80% Dacron 54 and undrawn polyester fiber of a lower softening point was processed on carding equipment to form a batt weighing grams per square yard. This batt was unified by passing through a 4-roll textile calender heated to 380 F. at which point the 20% of undrawn polyester fiber softens and acts as a binder fiber. The resulting unified sheet was two-thousandths of an inch thick and had a tensile strength of 3.18 pounds per inch-wide strip.
Samples of this material were heated at 400 F. for 5 minutes in a circulating air oven, without pressure or dimensional restraint being applied. No dimensional changes were observed, and the heat-treated product had a strength of 4.02 pounds per inch-wide strip, an increase of 25% over the base material.
I have found that the strength-increasing effects of this invention are not confined to fibrous arrays consisting entirely of fibers on the surface of which crystalline growth can be induced. but that such fibers can be mixed or diluted with what may be termed insensitive fibers, to realize strength increases of lesser degree, depending on the amount of dilution. For example, a series of intimate blends of 1% inch 3 denier rayon was made with 1% inch 3 denier Dacron 54 fiber, in which the Dacron fiber was present to the extent of 25 and These blends were carded and then needle-loomed under identical conditions to form a series of needled batts of varying fiber composition. All batts, together with a batt of Dacron 54 fiber of comparable weight, were then heattreated for 3 minutes at 400 F.
The strength of the treated 100% Dacron 54 batt was 20 times the strength of the base needled material; the 75% Dacron-25% rayon blend was increased 15 fold; the 50% Dacron-50% rayon blend was between 9 and 10 fold; and-the 25 Dacron-75% rayon blend was between 4 and 5 fold. This indicates that the strength increase is probably a straight-line function of the Dacron 54 content.
It also exemplifies a method of substantially doubling the strength of needled rayon batts by the inclusion of about 10% of Dacron 54 fiber followed by appropriate heat treatment according to this invention. This strength increase, moreover, is effect-ed without shrinking, fusing, or otherwise changing the fiber dimensions, and without the addition of bonding agents or other foreign material to the fibrous array.
As starting fibers for the practice of this invention, I
prefer to use synthetic polymeric fibers which do not exhibit strong retractive forces when heated. Although strength increases are shown both by low-temperature long-dwell tests and by high-temperature short-dwell tests, the latter method, :as explained above, is generally a more desirable commercial process since it may be made continuous with a set of carding machines or other fiberarranging devices, a needle loom, and an oven.
By suitable choice of fibers considered commercially as non-retractible, and by operating below the fusing or sticking point of the fibers, I arrive at strength increases which do not involve undesirable shrinkage of the array, so that there is no appreciable change in density due to compacting, nor is there any substantial stiffening or change in hand of the product. Thus the invention is especially adapted to the production of soft, porous, conformable, dimensionally stable fibrous arrays, characterized by a strength which is not attainable by any other process without sacrificing at least some of the desirable properties.
Having thus described my invention, what I claim is:
1. A non-woven array consisting at least in part of essentially unretracted and unfused synthetic fibers, said fibers having rough and irregular surfaces characterized by the adherent inclusion on said surfaces of irregularly distributed fiat prismatic crystals of fiber substance of a lower degree of polymerization than the main body of said fiber substance.
2. The product according to claim 1 wherein the array of fibers is a batt of intermingled fibers.
3. The product according to claim 1 wherein the array of fibers is a needled batt.
4. The product according to claim 3 wherein the array is composed at least in part of polyethylene terephthalate fibers.
References Cited by the Examiner UNITED STATES PATENTS 2,736,946 3/56 Stanton et a1 16l180 2,889,611 6/59 Bedell 2876 2,915,806 12/59 Grant 28-81 2,960,752 11/60 Sonnino 28-76 3,023,483 3/ 62 Steiner 28- -81 3,057,038 10/62 Soehngen 161173 3,096,563 7/ 63 Messinger 161-469 XR EARL M. BERGERT, Primary Examiner DONALD W. PARKER, Examiner.

Claims (1)

1. A NON-WOVEN ARRAY CONSISTING OF AT LEAST IN PART OF ESSENTIALLY UNRETARACTED AND UNFUSED SYNTHETIC FIBERS, SAID FIBERS HAVING ROUGH AND IRREGULAR SURFACES CHARACTERIZED BY THE ADHERENT INCLUSION ON SAID SURFACES OF IRREGULARLY DISTRIBUTED FLAT PRISMATIC CRYSTALS OF FIBER SUBSTANCE OF A LOWER DEGREE OF POLYMERIZATON THAN THE MAIN BODY OF SAID FIBER SUBSTANCE.
US181354A 1962-03-21 1962-03-21 Synthetic fibers with increased surface friction Expired - Lifetime US3180785A (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US181354A US3180785A (en) 1962-03-21 1962-03-21 Synthetic fibers with increased surface friction
US348319A US3221090A (en) 1962-03-21 1964-02-07 Process for increasing the strength of nonwoven arrays of polyethylene terephthalate fibers

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US181354A US3180785A (en) 1962-03-21 1962-03-21 Synthetic fibers with increased surface friction

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US3180785A true US3180785A (en) 1965-04-27

Family

ID=22663930

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US181354A Expired - Lifetime US3180785A (en) 1962-03-21 1962-03-21 Synthetic fibers with increased surface friction

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US3180785A (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4316928A (en) * 1979-11-09 1982-02-23 Milliken Research Corporation Mechanically surface finished textile material
US4349198A (en) * 1980-12-08 1982-09-14 Stelck Larry W String for sporting goods
US4377620A (en) * 1982-06-21 1983-03-22 Edward Alexander Gut for tennis racket and the like and method of making same
US4937141A (en) * 1987-08-03 1990-06-26 Newell Operating Company Microcellular synthetic paintbrush bristles

Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2736946A (en) * 1952-07-03 1956-03-06 Dow Chemical Co Polyacrylonitrile fibers having a scaly integument
US2889611A (en) * 1954-09-24 1959-06-09 Berkley W Bedell Treatment of nylon filaments
US2915806A (en) * 1953-11-09 1959-12-08 Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp Metal coated glass fiber combinations
US2960752A (en) * 1955-11-04 1960-11-22 American Cyanamid Co Method for producing a crimped tow
US3023483A (en) * 1959-02-19 1962-03-06 Steiner Walter Rope made from synthetic thermoplastics
US3057038A (en) * 1957-06-05 1962-10-09 Celanese Corp Wet spun cellulose triacetate
US3096563A (en) * 1959-06-18 1963-07-09 Du Pont Novel fabric of improved cover and reduced slickness

Patent Citations (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2736946A (en) * 1952-07-03 1956-03-06 Dow Chemical Co Polyacrylonitrile fibers having a scaly integument
US2915806A (en) * 1953-11-09 1959-12-08 Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp Metal coated glass fiber combinations
US2889611A (en) * 1954-09-24 1959-06-09 Berkley W Bedell Treatment of nylon filaments
US2960752A (en) * 1955-11-04 1960-11-22 American Cyanamid Co Method for producing a crimped tow
US3057038A (en) * 1957-06-05 1962-10-09 Celanese Corp Wet spun cellulose triacetate
US3023483A (en) * 1959-02-19 1962-03-06 Steiner Walter Rope made from synthetic thermoplastics
US3096563A (en) * 1959-06-18 1963-07-09 Du Pont Novel fabric of improved cover and reduced slickness

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4316928A (en) * 1979-11-09 1982-02-23 Milliken Research Corporation Mechanically surface finished textile material
US4349198A (en) * 1980-12-08 1982-09-14 Stelck Larry W String for sporting goods
US4377620A (en) * 1982-06-21 1983-03-22 Edward Alexander Gut for tennis racket and the like and method of making same
US4937141A (en) * 1987-08-03 1990-06-26 Newell Operating Company Microcellular synthetic paintbrush bristles

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4039711A (en) Non-woven fabrics
US4304817A (en) Polyester fiberfill blends
EP0127483B1 (en) Elastic thermal bonded non-woven fabric
EP0086103B1 (en) Process for producing a non-woven fabric of hot-melt-adhered composite fibers
US4281042A (en) Polyester fiberfill blends
US3629047A (en) Nonwoven fabric
US5407739A (en) Ignition resistant meltbrown or spunbonded insulation material
US6066388A (en) Process for the production of a nonwoven and nonwoven obtained by this process
US3770562A (en) Composite nonwoven fabrics
US3570085A (en) Method of forming a reinforced fabric by a compressive shrinking operation
GB1160428A (en) Bonded Fibrous Materials and Methods for Making them.
US3532588A (en) Needled nonwoven textile laminate
US3516900A (en) Gas activated bonding of polyamides
US3438844A (en) Spot-bonded nonwoven fabrics and their preparation
US3255064A (en) Process for mechanical crimping of fibers in sheet form
US5023131A (en) Cotton/polyester fiber blends and batts
US3180785A (en) Synthetic fibers with increased surface friction
US3317335A (en) Fibrous, non-woven sheet materials and the production thereof
US3499810A (en) Method of making a bonded nonwoven web of staple-length filaments
US3221090A (en) Process for increasing the strength of nonwoven arrays of polyethylene terephthalate fibers
US3458387A (en) Flexible non-woven sheet material and method of making the same
US3186897A (en) Sheet of autogenously bonded polytetrafluoroethylene fibers and method of producing same
EP0600844A1 (en) Thin clothing insulation with improved draping and comfort characteristics
US3122447A (en) Bonded nonwoven fabrics and methods of making the same
US3199167A (en) Process of manufacturing nonwoven fabrics