Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

US20120222544A1 - Protection device against projectile-forming charges - Google Patents

Protection device against projectile-forming charges Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20120222544A1
US20120222544A1 US13/412,183 US201213412183A US2012222544A1 US 20120222544 A1 US20120222544 A1 US 20120222544A1 US 201213412183 A US201213412183 A US 201213412183A US 2012222544 A1 US2012222544 A1 US 2012222544A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
projectile
protection device
strips
protection
substances
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US13/412,183
Inventor
Stephan Schaare
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rheinmetall Landsysteme GmbH
Original Assignee
Rheinmetall Landsysteme GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=43037670&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20120222544(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Rheinmetall Landsysteme GmbH filed Critical Rheinmetall Landsysteme GmbH
Assigned to RHEINMETALL LANDSYSTEME GMBH reassignment RHEINMETALL LANDSYSTEME GMBH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: SCHAARE, STEPHAN
Publication of US20120222544A1 publication Critical patent/US20120222544A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H5/00Armour; Armour plates
    • F41H5/02Plate construction
    • F41H5/04Plate construction composed of more than one layer

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a protection device for protection against projectiles, munitions and other forms of shot.
  • a multiplicity of lightweight and medium-weight armored vehicles are used during the course of out-of-area operations.
  • the armor on these vehicles must in this case be able to withstand different threats, and must nevertheless be as light as possible.
  • Armor systems which are also used on relatively small vehicles are preferred.
  • a pure solution of protection by armor steel is not compatible, from the system point of view, for all vehicles. Armor steel is itself too heavy, as a result of which a pure armor steel solution is impossible, within permissible vehicle weights.
  • EFP Exlosively Formed Projectiles.
  • EFP are among the penetration IEDs and in general impact on the side of the vehicle.
  • the invention is based on the idea of providing an arrangement of strips composed of different substances, at least two different substances, with the thickness/depth of the (individual) strips being considerably greater than the height, and with the height of the strips preferably being half as great as the caliber of the EFP flying projectile.
  • the strips, which are located alongside one another, should have substances with considerably different strengths.
  • the distance (formed by the softer strips) between the two harder strips should in contrast be less than the caliber.
  • the harder strips need not in this case have the same material.
  • This sandwich structure is aligned such that the substance layers face the effect direction, located one above the other.
  • a protection structure is thus formed, which has a high (adequate) volume and mass efficiency.
  • the starting point is that the projectile impacts on at least two substances of different materials, so that the projectile enters through the softer substance quickly, while the harder substance slows the projectile down, and the projectile is stopped via the penetration depth or the depth of the protection.
  • the projectile is held in place and offers an obstruction in its own right against possible subsequent projectiles.
  • the penetration performance into the ballistically effective substances is considerably reduced in particular by the mechanism of the projectile breaking up, thus resulting in a greater mass and volume efficiency in comparison to armor steel or other protection structures.
  • FIGURE illustrates a protection device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • the single FIGURE shows the structure of a protection arrangement or protection device 10 , with 1 denoting a first strip 1 of a substance A, and item 2 denoting a second strip of a substance B (lower part of the illustration in the FIGURE).
  • the depth of the strips is annotated -t-, and the respective height of the strips 1 , 2 is annotated -h-.
  • the bombardment direction is in this case indicated by the arrow BR, pointing from right to left.
  • the depth and the height of the strips should be chosen to match the respectively prevailing threat.
  • the depth of the protection structure should be about 30 mm to 50 mm, and the height (thickness) should, for example, be 15 mm.
  • the thickness of the individual strips can be chosen on the on basis of the requirement, but should preferably be the same, for simple production of the production structure 10 .
  • the protection arrangement 10 When the projectile 5 which has been formed strikes the protection arrangement 10 , it will slide more quickly through the softer substance (A, B, C) than through the harder substance. The projectile 5 which is formed is broken up and deflected in its penetration direction, and is held in the protection structure 10 .
  • the concept can also be applied against medium-caliber projectiles, since a protection arrangement 10 such as this can be used, for example, as protection level four (4), without greater complexity.
  • the invention furthermore provides for the protection device 1 to be fitted movably, rather than rigidly. Particularly in the case of moving objects, this has the advantage that the protection device can change its position with respect to the vehicle, and therefore subsequent projectiles 5 , by its own acceleration or various other movement changes.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)

Abstract

A protective device is provided that includes material strips made of at least two different materials, wherein the thickness of the strips is considerably larger than the height and the height of the strips is at least half as large as the calibre of the explosively formed projectile and both materials have considerably different strengths. The alignment of the sandwich composition is such that the material layers arranged on top of each other face the impact direction. Thus, a projectile designed in the direction of the protective structure shears off and no longer slide through the protection in a straight manner.

Description

  • This nonprovisional application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/EP2010/005302, which was filed on Aug. 28, 2010, and which claims priority to German Patent Application No. DE 10 2009 040 305.1, which was filed in Germany on Sep. 5, 2009, and which are both herein incorporated by reference.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The invention relates to a protection device for protection against projectiles, munitions and other forms of shot.
  • 2. Description of the Background Art
  • A multiplicity of lightweight and medium-weight armored vehicles are used during the course of out-of-area operations. The armor on these vehicles must in this case be able to withstand different threats, and must nevertheless be as light as possible. Armor systems which are also used on relatively small vehicles are preferred. A pure solution of protection by armor steel is not compatible, from the system point of view, for all vehicles. Armor steel is itself too heavy, as a result of which a pure armor steel solution is impossible, within permissible vehicle weights.
  • Various other protection solutions are based on a combination of different substances, in particular using fiber composites based on aromatic polyamides (aramide) or polyethylene (dyneema). However, in comparison to armor steels, these have a low volume efficiency, leading to permissible or desired vehicle widths being exceeded.
  • The various threats also include EFP—Explosively Formed Projectiles. EFP are among the penetration IEDs and in general impact on the side of the vehicle. A distinction is drawn between monoslug EFP, which form a single projectile, and multislug EFP, which produce a plurality of projectiles by fragmentation of the warhead lining. In this case, distinction is also drawn between parallel multislug, in which a plurality of projectiles impact on different vehicle points at the same time, and serial multislug, in which the same point is hit repeatedly, successively. Because of their mass and velocity, EFP frequently penetrate through conventional armor systems.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • It is therefore an object of the invention to provide system-compatible protection in particular of lightweight vehicles, such as wheeled vehicles which forms adequate protection in particular against EFP.
  • The invention is based on the idea of providing an arrangement of strips composed of different substances, at least two different substances, with the thickness/depth of the (individual) strips being considerably greater than the height, and with the height of the strips preferably being half as great as the caliber of the EFP flying projectile. The strips, which are located alongside one another, should have substances with considerably different strengths. The distance (formed by the softer strips) between the two harder strips should in contrast be less than the caliber. However, the harder strips need not in this case have the same material. This sandwich structure is aligned such that the substance layers face the effect direction, located one above the other. This means that, when a projectile which has been formed in the direction of the protection structure impacts on the protection structure, it penetrates deeper into the softer substances than into the harder substances located alongside them, because of the different substances, and thus breaks off and can therefore no longer actually pass through the protection.
  • Because of the sandwich structure with different substances located alongside one another and on one another, the penetration speed of the flying projectile into the strips composed of a substance with different strengths is different, causing the projectile to break up, and considerably reducing its effectiveness (penetration performance). A protection structure is thus formed, which has a high (adequate) volume and mass efficiency.
  • Steel and aluminum, ceramic (such as SiC, Al2O3, B4C) and aluminum, steel and plastic (polyethylene, polypropylene, polyamide) or ceramic and plastic, or steel, aluminum and ceramic etc. are feasible as substance combinations with one another.
  • The starting point is that the projectile impacts on at least two substances of different materials, so that the projectile enters through the softer substance quickly, while the harder substance slows the projectile down, and the projectile is stopped via the penetration depth or the depth of the protection. The projectile is held in place and offers an obstruction in its own right against possible subsequent projectiles.
  • The penetration performance into the ballistically effective substances is considerably reduced in particular by the mechanism of the projectile breaking up, thus resulting in a greater mass and volume efficiency in comparison to armor steel or other protection structures.
  • Further scope of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
  • The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given hereinbelow and the accompanying drawing which is given by way of illustration only, and thus, are not limitive of the present invention, and wherein the single FIGURE illustrates a protection device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • The single FIGURE shows the structure of a protection arrangement or protection device 10, with 1 denoting a first strip 1 of a substance A, and item 2 denoting a second strip of a substance B (lower part of the illustration in the FIGURE). The depth of the strips is annotated -t-, and the respective height of the strips 1, 2 is annotated -h-. The bombardment direction is in this case indicated by the arrow BR, pointing from right to left.
  • The depth and the height of the strips should be chosen to match the respectively prevailing threat. In the case of a projectile 5 with a caliber of 30 mm, the depth of the protection structure should be about 30 mm to 50 mm, and the height (thickness) should, for example, be 15 mm. The thickness of the individual strips can be chosen on the on basis of the requirement, but should preferably be the same, for simple production of the production structure 10.
  • Structures composed of substances A, B, C, D etc., (strips 3, 4) are likewise possible (upper part of the illustration in the FIGURE).
  • When the projectile 5 which has been formed strikes the protection arrangement 10, it will slide more quickly through the softer substance (A, B, C) than through the harder substance. The projectile 5 which is formed is broken up and deflected in its penetration direction, and is held in the protection structure 10.
  • The concept can also be applied against medium-caliber projectiles, since a protection arrangement 10 such as this can be used, for example, as protection level four (4), without greater complexity.
  • The invention furthermore provides for the protection device 1 to be fitted movably, rather than rigidly. Particularly in the case of moving objects, this has the advantage that the protection device can change its position with respect to the vehicle, and therefore subsequent projectiles 5, by its own acceleration or various other movement changes.
  • The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are to be included within the scope of the following claims.

Claims (4)

1. A protection device for protection of an object, the protection device comprising a sandwich structure formed of different substances, an the alignment of the sandwich structure thereby forming substance layers being arranged such that the substance layers face an effect direction located alongside one another or one above the other, with a projectile impacting on at least two substances of different materials such that a portion of the projectile penetrates quickly through one material, while another portion of the projectile penetrates more slowly in the other material.
2. The protection device as claimed in claim 1, wherein a thickness of the substance strips is considerably greater than a height, and wherein the height of the strips is at least half as great as the caliber of the EFP flying projectile.
3. The protection device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the substances have considerably different strengths.
4. The protection device as claimed in claim 1, wherein the substance layers include combinations of steel, aluminum, ceramic, silicon carbide or aluminum oxide and plastic, polyethylene, polypropylene or polyamide, thus forming two layers or a plurality of layers of different materials.
US13/412,183 2009-09-05 2012-03-05 Protection device against projectile-forming charges Abandoned US20120222544A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102009040305A DE102009040305B4 (en) 2009-09-05 2009-09-05 Protective device against projectile-forming charges
DE102009040305.1 2009-09-05
PCT/EP2010/005302 WO2011035841A1 (en) 2009-09-05 2010-08-28 Protective device against charges forming a projectile

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/EP2010/005302 Continuation WO2011035841A1 (en) 2009-09-05 2010-08-28 Protective device against charges forming a projectile

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20120222544A1 true US20120222544A1 (en) 2012-09-06

Family

ID=43037670

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/412,183 Abandoned US20120222544A1 (en) 2009-09-05 2012-03-05 Protection device against projectile-forming charges

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20120222544A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2473815A1 (en)
DE (1) DE102009040305B4 (en)
WO (1) WO2011035841A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2565290B1 (en) 2011-08-30 2018-08-01 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH Ballistic protection system

Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2318301A (en) * 1939-03-15 1943-05-04 Us Rubber Co Bullet resisting armor
US3765299A (en) * 1968-09-06 1973-10-16 Us Army Universal applique armor
US5668344A (en) * 1994-01-25 1997-09-16 Bornstein; Avraham Ballistic panel
US7080587B2 (en) * 2002-01-29 2006-07-25 Rafael Armament Development Authority Ltd Armor module
US7163731B2 (en) * 1998-03-20 2007-01-16 Rafael Armament Development Authority, Ltd. Lightweight armor against firearm projectiles
US8091465B2 (en) * 2007-10-07 2012-01-10 Plasan Sasa Ltd. Armor module and an armor array used therein
US20120024138A1 (en) * 2010-07-30 2012-02-02 Schott Diamondview Armor Products, Llc Armor panels having strip-shaped protection elements
US8293353B2 (en) * 2008-11-25 2012-10-23 Milliken & Company Energy absorbing panel

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB543645A (en) * 1940-08-07 1942-03-06 Hunt & Turner Ltd Improvements in protective armouring
GB1142689A (en) 1966-03-29 1969-02-12 Aerojet General Co Armour plating
DE3122367C1 (en) * 1981-06-05 1994-12-22 Deutsche Aerospace Wall for protection against shaped charges and kinetic-energy projectiles
GB2191275B (en) * 1986-06-04 1990-01-04 Royal Ordnance Plc Composite armour
US5736474A (en) * 1993-03-25 1998-04-07 Thomas; Howard L. Multi-structure ballistic material
IL124190A (en) * 1998-03-20 2006-12-31 Rafael Advanced Defense Sys Lightweight armor against firearm projectiles
US20060013977A1 (en) * 2004-07-13 2006-01-19 Duke Leslie P Polymeric ballistic material and method of making
WO2009096956A1 (en) * 2008-01-30 2009-08-06 Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. Protective armor structure

Patent Citations (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2318301A (en) * 1939-03-15 1943-05-04 Us Rubber Co Bullet resisting armor
US3765299A (en) * 1968-09-06 1973-10-16 Us Army Universal applique armor
US5668344A (en) * 1994-01-25 1997-09-16 Bornstein; Avraham Ballistic panel
US7163731B2 (en) * 1998-03-20 2007-01-16 Rafael Armament Development Authority, Ltd. Lightweight armor against firearm projectiles
US7080587B2 (en) * 2002-01-29 2006-07-25 Rafael Armament Development Authority Ltd Armor module
US8091465B2 (en) * 2007-10-07 2012-01-10 Plasan Sasa Ltd. Armor module and an armor array used therein
US8293353B2 (en) * 2008-11-25 2012-10-23 Milliken & Company Energy absorbing panel
US20120024138A1 (en) * 2010-07-30 2012-02-02 Schott Diamondview Armor Products, Llc Armor panels having strip-shaped protection elements

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2011035841A1 (en) 2011-03-31
DE102009040305A1 (en) 2011-05-12
DE102009040305B4 (en) 2012-01-05
EP2473815A1 (en) 2012-07-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7987762B2 (en) Apparatus for defeating high energy projectiles
US6912944B2 (en) Ceramic armour systems with a front spall layer and a shock absorbing layer
US4131053A (en) Armor plate
EP2156134B1 (en) Armour arrangement
US7077048B1 (en) Multi-layered trap ballistic armor
US20120017754A1 (en) Armor system and method for defeating high energy projectiles that include metal jets
US8091464B1 (en) Shaped charge resistant protective shield
US8020483B2 (en) Armor module
US20120186430A1 (en) Reshaping Projectiles to Improve Armor Protection
US20110083549A1 (en) Multi-Functional Armor System
US10837740B2 (en) Reactive armor
US8336439B2 (en) Layering non-metallic layers between metallic layers to improve armor protection
US20100212484A1 (en) Method and apparatus for changing the trajectory of a projectile
US20110162516A1 (en) Method of Layering Composite Sheets to Improve Armor Capabilities
US6718861B1 (en) Momentum trap ballistic armor system
US11703310B2 (en) Penetrator, use of a penetrator, and projectile
US20120186432A1 (en) Layering of Air Gaps To Improve Armor Protection
US20120222544A1 (en) Protection device against projectile-forming charges
US6581504B2 (en) Passive armor for protection against shaped charges
US20120186431A1 (en) Armor System Comprising Dilatant Material To Improve Armor Protection
US8074552B1 (en) Flyer plate armor systems and methods
US9891027B2 (en) System and method for neutralizing shaped-charge threats
JP2018506697A (en) Reactive armor
EP1790939A1 (en) An active reactive armour
KR200363104Y1 (en) Assembly for reinforcing fireproof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: RHEINMETALL LANDSYSTEME GMBH, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SCHAARE, STEPHAN;REEL/FRAME:028242/0938

Effective date: 20120306

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION