US20120222544A1 - Protection device against projectile-forming charges - Google Patents
Protection device against projectile-forming charges Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20120222544A1 US20120222544A1 US13/412,183 US201213412183A US2012222544A1 US 20120222544 A1 US20120222544 A1 US 20120222544A1 US 201213412183 A US201213412183 A US 201213412183A US 2012222544 A1 US2012222544 A1 US 2012222544A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- projectile
- protection device
- strips
- protection
- substances
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H5/00—Armour; Armour plates
- F41H5/02—Plate construction
- F41H5/04—Plate construction composed of more than one layer
Definitions
- the invention relates to a protection device for protection against projectiles, munitions and other forms of shot.
- a multiplicity of lightweight and medium-weight armored vehicles are used during the course of out-of-area operations.
- the armor on these vehicles must in this case be able to withstand different threats, and must nevertheless be as light as possible.
- Armor systems which are also used on relatively small vehicles are preferred.
- a pure solution of protection by armor steel is not compatible, from the system point of view, for all vehicles. Armor steel is itself too heavy, as a result of which a pure armor steel solution is impossible, within permissible vehicle weights.
- EFP Exlosively Formed Projectiles.
- EFP are among the penetration IEDs and in general impact on the side of the vehicle.
- the invention is based on the idea of providing an arrangement of strips composed of different substances, at least two different substances, with the thickness/depth of the (individual) strips being considerably greater than the height, and with the height of the strips preferably being half as great as the caliber of the EFP flying projectile.
- the strips, which are located alongside one another, should have substances with considerably different strengths.
- the distance (formed by the softer strips) between the two harder strips should in contrast be less than the caliber.
- the harder strips need not in this case have the same material.
- This sandwich structure is aligned such that the substance layers face the effect direction, located one above the other.
- a protection structure is thus formed, which has a high (adequate) volume and mass efficiency.
- the starting point is that the projectile impacts on at least two substances of different materials, so that the projectile enters through the softer substance quickly, while the harder substance slows the projectile down, and the projectile is stopped via the penetration depth or the depth of the protection.
- the projectile is held in place and offers an obstruction in its own right against possible subsequent projectiles.
- the penetration performance into the ballistically effective substances is considerably reduced in particular by the mechanism of the projectile breaking up, thus resulting in a greater mass and volume efficiency in comparison to armor steel or other protection structures.
- FIGURE illustrates a protection device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- the single FIGURE shows the structure of a protection arrangement or protection device 10 , with 1 denoting a first strip 1 of a substance A, and item 2 denoting a second strip of a substance B (lower part of the illustration in the FIGURE).
- the depth of the strips is annotated -t-, and the respective height of the strips 1 , 2 is annotated -h-.
- the bombardment direction is in this case indicated by the arrow BR, pointing from right to left.
- the depth and the height of the strips should be chosen to match the respectively prevailing threat.
- the depth of the protection structure should be about 30 mm to 50 mm, and the height (thickness) should, for example, be 15 mm.
- the thickness of the individual strips can be chosen on the on basis of the requirement, but should preferably be the same, for simple production of the production structure 10 .
- the protection arrangement 10 When the projectile 5 which has been formed strikes the protection arrangement 10 , it will slide more quickly through the softer substance (A, B, C) than through the harder substance. The projectile 5 which is formed is broken up and deflected in its penetration direction, and is held in the protection structure 10 .
- the concept can also be applied against medium-caliber projectiles, since a protection arrangement 10 such as this can be used, for example, as protection level four (4), without greater complexity.
- the invention furthermore provides for the protection device 1 to be fitted movably, rather than rigidly. Particularly in the case of moving objects, this has the advantage that the protection device can change its position with respect to the vehicle, and therefore subsequent projectiles 5 , by its own acceleration or various other movement changes.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
Abstract
A protective device is provided that includes material strips made of at least two different materials, wherein the thickness of the strips is considerably larger than the height and the height of the strips is at least half as large as the calibre of the explosively formed projectile and both materials have considerably different strengths. The alignment of the sandwich composition is such that the material layers arranged on top of each other face the impact direction. Thus, a projectile designed in the direction of the protective structure shears off and no longer slide through the protection in a straight manner.
Description
- This nonprovisional application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/EP2010/005302, which was filed on Aug. 28, 2010, and which claims priority to German Patent Application No. DE 10 2009 040 305.1, which was filed in Germany on Sep. 5, 2009, and which are both herein incorporated by reference.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The invention relates to a protection device for protection against projectiles, munitions and other forms of shot.
- 2. Description of the Background Art
- A multiplicity of lightweight and medium-weight armored vehicles are used during the course of out-of-area operations. The armor on these vehicles must in this case be able to withstand different threats, and must nevertheless be as light as possible. Armor systems which are also used on relatively small vehicles are preferred. A pure solution of protection by armor steel is not compatible, from the system point of view, for all vehicles. Armor steel is itself too heavy, as a result of which a pure armor steel solution is impossible, within permissible vehicle weights.
- Various other protection solutions are based on a combination of different substances, in particular using fiber composites based on aromatic polyamides (aramide) or polyethylene (dyneema). However, in comparison to armor steels, these have a low volume efficiency, leading to permissible or desired vehicle widths being exceeded.
- The various threats also include EFP—Explosively Formed Projectiles. EFP are among the penetration IEDs and in general impact on the side of the vehicle. A distinction is drawn between monoslug EFP, which form a single projectile, and multislug EFP, which produce a plurality of projectiles by fragmentation of the warhead lining. In this case, distinction is also drawn between parallel multislug, in which a plurality of projectiles impact on different vehicle points at the same time, and serial multislug, in which the same point is hit repeatedly, successively. Because of their mass and velocity, EFP frequently penetrate through conventional armor systems.
- It is therefore an object of the invention to provide system-compatible protection in particular of lightweight vehicles, such as wheeled vehicles which forms adequate protection in particular against EFP.
- The invention is based on the idea of providing an arrangement of strips composed of different substances, at least two different substances, with the thickness/depth of the (individual) strips being considerably greater than the height, and with the height of the strips preferably being half as great as the caliber of the EFP flying projectile. The strips, which are located alongside one another, should have substances with considerably different strengths. The distance (formed by the softer strips) between the two harder strips should in contrast be less than the caliber. However, the harder strips need not in this case have the same material. This sandwich structure is aligned such that the substance layers face the effect direction, located one above the other. This means that, when a projectile which has been formed in the direction of the protection structure impacts on the protection structure, it penetrates deeper into the softer substances than into the harder substances located alongside them, because of the different substances, and thus breaks off and can therefore no longer actually pass through the protection.
- Because of the sandwich structure with different substances located alongside one another and on one another, the penetration speed of the flying projectile into the strips composed of a substance with different strengths is different, causing the projectile to break up, and considerably reducing its effectiveness (penetration performance). A protection structure is thus formed, which has a high (adequate) volume and mass efficiency.
- Steel and aluminum, ceramic (such as SiC, Al2O3, B4C) and aluminum, steel and plastic (polyethylene, polypropylene, polyamide) or ceramic and plastic, or steel, aluminum and ceramic etc. are feasible as substance combinations with one another.
- The starting point is that the projectile impacts on at least two substances of different materials, so that the projectile enters through the softer substance quickly, while the harder substance slows the projectile down, and the projectile is stopped via the penetration depth or the depth of the protection. The projectile is held in place and offers an obstruction in its own right against possible subsequent projectiles.
- The penetration performance into the ballistically effective substances is considerably reduced in particular by the mechanism of the projectile breaking up, thus resulting in a greater mass and volume efficiency in comparison to armor steel or other protection structures.
- Further scope of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description given hereinafter. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
- The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given hereinbelow and the accompanying drawing which is given by way of illustration only, and thus, are not limitive of the present invention, and wherein the single FIGURE illustrates a protection device according to an embodiment of the present invention.
- The single FIGURE shows the structure of a protection arrangement or
protection device 10, with 1 denoting afirst strip 1 of a substance A, anditem 2 denoting a second strip of a substance B (lower part of the illustration in the FIGURE). The depth of the strips is annotated -t-, and the respective height of thestrips - The depth and the height of the strips should be chosen to match the respectively prevailing threat. In the case of a
projectile 5 with a caliber of 30 mm, the depth of the protection structure should be about 30 mm to 50 mm, and the height (thickness) should, for example, be 15 mm. The thickness of the individual strips can be chosen on the on basis of the requirement, but should preferably be the same, for simple production of theproduction structure 10. - Structures composed of substances A, B, C, D etc., (
strips 3, 4) are likewise possible (upper part of the illustration in the FIGURE). - When the
projectile 5 which has been formed strikes theprotection arrangement 10, it will slide more quickly through the softer substance (A, B, C) than through the harder substance. Theprojectile 5 which is formed is broken up and deflected in its penetration direction, and is held in theprotection structure 10. - The concept can also be applied against medium-caliber projectiles, since a
protection arrangement 10 such as this can be used, for example, as protection level four (4), without greater complexity. - The invention furthermore provides for the
protection device 1 to be fitted movably, rather than rigidly. Particularly in the case of moving objects, this has the advantage that the protection device can change its position with respect to the vehicle, and thereforesubsequent projectiles 5, by its own acceleration or various other movement changes. - The invention being thus described, it will be obvious that the same may be varied in many ways. Such variations are not to be regarded as a departure from the spirit and scope of the invention, and all such modifications as would be obvious to one skilled in the art are to be included within the scope of the following claims.
Claims (4)
1. A protection device for protection of an object, the protection device comprising a sandwich structure formed of different substances, an the alignment of the sandwich structure thereby forming substance layers being arranged such that the substance layers face an effect direction located alongside one another or one above the other, with a projectile impacting on at least two substances of different materials such that a portion of the projectile penetrates quickly through one material, while another portion of the projectile penetrates more slowly in the other material.
2. The protection device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein a thickness of the substance strips is considerably greater than a height, and wherein the height of the strips is at least half as great as the caliber of the EFP flying projectile.
3. The protection device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the substances have considerably different strengths.
4. The protection device as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the substance layers include combinations of steel, aluminum, ceramic, silicon carbide or aluminum oxide and plastic, polyethylene, polypropylene or polyamide, thus forming two layers or a plurality of layers of different materials.
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102009040305A DE102009040305B4 (en) | 2009-09-05 | 2009-09-05 | Protective device against projectile-forming charges |
DE102009040305.1 | 2009-09-05 | ||
PCT/EP2010/005302 WO2011035841A1 (en) | 2009-09-05 | 2010-08-28 | Protective device against charges forming a projectile |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/005302 Continuation WO2011035841A1 (en) | 2009-09-05 | 2010-08-28 | Protective device against charges forming a projectile |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20120222544A1 true US20120222544A1 (en) | 2012-09-06 |
Family
ID=43037670
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US13/412,183 Abandoned US20120222544A1 (en) | 2009-09-05 | 2012-03-05 | Protection device against projectile-forming charges |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20120222544A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2473815A1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE102009040305B4 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2011035841A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2565290B1 (en) | 2011-08-30 | 2018-08-01 | Rheinmetall Waffe Munition GmbH | Ballistic protection system |
Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2318301A (en) * | 1939-03-15 | 1943-05-04 | Us Rubber Co | Bullet resisting armor |
US3765299A (en) * | 1968-09-06 | 1973-10-16 | Us Army | Universal applique armor |
US5668344A (en) * | 1994-01-25 | 1997-09-16 | Bornstein; Avraham | Ballistic panel |
US7080587B2 (en) * | 2002-01-29 | 2006-07-25 | Rafael Armament Development Authority Ltd | Armor module |
US7163731B2 (en) * | 1998-03-20 | 2007-01-16 | Rafael Armament Development Authority, Ltd. | Lightweight armor against firearm projectiles |
US8091465B2 (en) * | 2007-10-07 | 2012-01-10 | Plasan Sasa Ltd. | Armor module and an armor array used therein |
US20120024138A1 (en) * | 2010-07-30 | 2012-02-02 | Schott Diamondview Armor Products, Llc | Armor panels having strip-shaped protection elements |
US8293353B2 (en) * | 2008-11-25 | 2012-10-23 | Milliken & Company | Energy absorbing panel |
Family Cites Families (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB543645A (en) * | 1940-08-07 | 1942-03-06 | Hunt & Turner Ltd | Improvements in protective armouring |
GB1142689A (en) | 1966-03-29 | 1969-02-12 | Aerojet General Co | Armour plating |
DE3122367C1 (en) * | 1981-06-05 | 1994-12-22 | Deutsche Aerospace | Wall for protection against shaped charges and kinetic-energy projectiles |
GB2191275B (en) * | 1986-06-04 | 1990-01-04 | Royal Ordnance Plc | Composite armour |
US5736474A (en) * | 1993-03-25 | 1998-04-07 | Thomas; Howard L. | Multi-structure ballistic material |
IL124190A (en) * | 1998-03-20 | 2006-12-31 | Rafael Advanced Defense Sys | Lightweight armor against firearm projectiles |
US20060013977A1 (en) * | 2004-07-13 | 2006-01-19 | Duke Leslie P | Polymeric ballistic material and method of making |
WO2009096956A1 (en) * | 2008-01-30 | 2009-08-06 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Protective armor structure |
-
2009
- 2009-09-05 DE DE102009040305A patent/DE102009040305B4/en not_active Revoked
-
2010
- 2010-08-28 EP EP10749801A patent/EP2473815A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2010-08-28 WO PCT/EP2010/005302 patent/WO2011035841A1/en active Application Filing
-
2012
- 2012-03-05 US US13/412,183 patent/US20120222544A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2318301A (en) * | 1939-03-15 | 1943-05-04 | Us Rubber Co | Bullet resisting armor |
US3765299A (en) * | 1968-09-06 | 1973-10-16 | Us Army | Universal applique armor |
US5668344A (en) * | 1994-01-25 | 1997-09-16 | Bornstein; Avraham | Ballistic panel |
US7163731B2 (en) * | 1998-03-20 | 2007-01-16 | Rafael Armament Development Authority, Ltd. | Lightweight armor against firearm projectiles |
US7080587B2 (en) * | 2002-01-29 | 2006-07-25 | Rafael Armament Development Authority Ltd | Armor module |
US8091465B2 (en) * | 2007-10-07 | 2012-01-10 | Plasan Sasa Ltd. | Armor module and an armor array used therein |
US8293353B2 (en) * | 2008-11-25 | 2012-10-23 | Milliken & Company | Energy absorbing panel |
US20120024138A1 (en) * | 2010-07-30 | 2012-02-02 | Schott Diamondview Armor Products, Llc | Armor panels having strip-shaped protection elements |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2011035841A1 (en) | 2011-03-31 |
DE102009040305A1 (en) | 2011-05-12 |
DE102009040305B4 (en) | 2012-01-05 |
EP2473815A1 (en) | 2012-07-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7987762B2 (en) | Apparatus for defeating high energy projectiles | |
US6912944B2 (en) | Ceramic armour systems with a front spall layer and a shock absorbing layer | |
US4131053A (en) | Armor plate | |
EP2156134B1 (en) | Armour arrangement | |
US7077048B1 (en) | Multi-layered trap ballistic armor | |
US20120017754A1 (en) | Armor system and method for defeating high energy projectiles that include metal jets | |
US8091464B1 (en) | Shaped charge resistant protective shield | |
US8020483B2 (en) | Armor module | |
US20120186430A1 (en) | Reshaping Projectiles to Improve Armor Protection | |
US20110083549A1 (en) | Multi-Functional Armor System | |
US10837740B2 (en) | Reactive armor | |
US8336439B2 (en) | Layering non-metallic layers between metallic layers to improve armor protection | |
US20100212484A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for changing the trajectory of a projectile | |
US20110162516A1 (en) | Method of Layering Composite Sheets to Improve Armor Capabilities | |
US6718861B1 (en) | Momentum trap ballistic armor system | |
US11703310B2 (en) | Penetrator, use of a penetrator, and projectile | |
US20120186432A1 (en) | Layering of Air Gaps To Improve Armor Protection | |
US20120222544A1 (en) | Protection device against projectile-forming charges | |
US6581504B2 (en) | Passive armor for protection against shaped charges | |
US20120186431A1 (en) | Armor System Comprising Dilatant Material To Improve Armor Protection | |
US8074552B1 (en) | Flyer plate armor systems and methods | |
US9891027B2 (en) | System and method for neutralizing shaped-charge threats | |
JP2018506697A (en) | Reactive armor | |
EP1790939A1 (en) | An active reactive armour | |
KR200363104Y1 (en) | Assembly for reinforcing fireproof |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: RHEINMETALL LANDSYSTEME GMBH, GERMANY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:SCHAARE, STEPHAN;REEL/FRAME:028242/0938 Effective date: 20120306 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |