US20100296710A1 - Measuring body for an implant and method for providing a 3d measurement drawing - Google Patents
Measuring body for an implant and method for providing a 3d measurement drawing Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20100296710A1 US20100296710A1 US12/785,282 US78528210A US2010296710A1 US 20100296710 A1 US20100296710 A1 US 20100296710A1 US 78528210 A US78528210 A US 78528210A US 2010296710 A1 US2010296710 A1 US 2010296710A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- implant
- supporting member
- bearing
- measuring body
- inspection part
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 239000007943 implant Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 71
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 14
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 title abstract description 4
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims description 53
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 210000004195 gingiva Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000011505 plaster Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C8/00—Means to be fixed to the jaw-bone for consolidating natural teeth or for fixing dental prostheses thereon; Dental implants; Implanting tools
- A61C8/0001—Impression means for implants, e.g. impression coping
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C9/00—Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
- A61C9/004—Means or methods for taking digitized impressions
- A61C9/0046—Data acquisition means or methods
- A61C9/0053—Optical means or methods, e.g. scanning the teeth by a laser or light beam
Definitions
- the invention relates to a measuring body for an implant, comprising a measuring geometry detectable by a scanning camera and a connecting geometry for the implant.
- the invention further relates to a method for generating a measured 3D image of a measuring body mounted on an implant, and the implant to be used is selected from a number of various types of implant.
- a freshly inserted or already healed implant is fitted with a temporary measuring body to indicate the orientation and position of the implant at a level above the region of the jaw or gingiva.
- This method is also used for implant analogs placed in plaster models.
- With the aid of a surface scan of the situation it is possible, by means of special algorithms, to recognize the exposed shape of the measuring body automatically and to compute its orientation and position. Since its geometrical shape is precisely known, the orientation of the implant and its position can be computed that are hidden in the jaw, in the gingiva, or in the model and are not directly visible in a surface scan of the situation. It is then possible to design an appropriate dental prosthetic item by means of CAD/CAM.
- a large number of greatly varying implant shapes are available on the market, these differing, inter alia, mainly in the diameter and connecting geometry of the mounted dental prosthetic item, for example an abutment.
- Measuring bodies are disclosed in DE 694 13 852 T2.
- the measuring bodies are formed as a single piece and exhibit a shaft, at one end of which the measuring geometry is disposed and at its other end there is provided a spigot, by means of which the measuring body is fitted to the implant.
- EP 0 599 578 A2 discloses a measuring body with a measuring geometry and an auxiliary measuring body which is attachable to the main measuring body.
- the auxiliary measuring body is mounted on the main measuring body so that the auxiliary measuring body forms the inspection part and can be recorded by the impression compound subsequently introduced.
- the auxiliary measuring body has a measuring geometry on its underside projecting from the impression compound so that the position and alignment of the auxiliary measuring body within the impression can be determined. No provision is made for measurement of the auxiliary body mounted on the implant.
- DE 10 2004 035 091 A1 discloses measuring elements having a measuring geometry and provided with a connecting geometry for the implant.
- the measuring elements are fixed via the connecting geometry to the implant so that the alignment of the implant axis on the one hand and the position of the connecting geometry on the other hand can be deduced from the measuring geometry.
- the measuring geometry is disposed on an inspection part and the connecting geometry on a supporting member and both the inspection part and the supporting member are in the form of separate components, and the supporting member has a bearing for the inspection part and the inspection part has a counter-bearing matching said bearing and the measuring geometry is provided on a free end of the inspection part mounted on said supporting member.
- the inspection part When the inspection part is in the mounted state, the measuring geometry faces the scanning camera. This means that the inspection part can be developed and fabricated independently of the supporting member. In the case of varying types of implant, it is necessary to appropriately redesign and re-make the supporting member. This can take place, according to the invention, irrespectively of designing or fabricating the inspection part.
- the design of the inspection part substantially depends on the measuring geometry and the evaluation software developed for this purpose, which can remain unchanged despite adaptation of the measuring body to new types of implant by modification of the supporting member.
- the provision of a separate inspection part reduces the development effort for the hardware, that is to say, for the overall measuring body. Since the measuring body is a precision-made part which has to be fabricated to a tolerance of a few ⁇ m, the development effort for the production of a mold or of a machine adapted for fabrication of the inspection part of the measuring body occurs only once. Only the supporting member must be redeveloped and re-made for each new implant shape to be supported.
- the inspection part can be produced, and the associated surface recognition algorithm developed by the software developer, while the supporting member is manufactured by the producer of the respective implant shape.
- the supporting member of the measuring body can be composed of an arbitrary material when used in the mouth of a patient, that is, for example, a food-grade material, whilst the inspection part can be formed from a readily scannable material.
- the supporting member a number of times using disinfectable materials.
- the invention makes it possible, as explained above, to simplify and segregate the sequence of operations required for the production of a new measuring body for detection of the position and orientation of an implant placed in the jawbone.
- the software-based and hardware-(tool)-based development costs are both reduced.
- the bearing has a longitudinal axis and a first stop limit surface effective in the direction of the longitudinal axis and the counter-bearing has a longitudinal axis and a second stop limit surface effective in the direction of said longitudinal axis, and the first stop limit surface and the second stop limit surface can be caused to abut each other in the axial direction of the longitudinal axes.
- the stop limit surfaces can preferably be normal to the longitudinal axis such that radial contact between the bearing and the counter-bearing does not come about via the stop limit surfaces.
- other guide surfaces parallel to the longitudinal axis can be provided to ensure radial guidance between the bearing and the counter-bearing.
- the supporting member exhibits a connecting geometry which corresponds to the connecting geometry of the implant. It is usually desirable to connect the measuring body to the connecting geometry of the implant, in order not only to detect the axial alignment of the implant but also to register the angular position of the connecting geometry of the implant.
- bearing and the counter-bearing have orienting means to ensure perfect orientation in the circumferential direction relative to the longitudinal axes between the supporting member and the inspection part. With alignment of the supporting member toward the connecting geometry of the implant it can now be advantageous to transmit the position of the inspection part relative to the supporting member at least in the circumferential direction unambiguously via the aforementioned orienting means.
- the orienting means may be in the form of stop means or stop limit surfaces and to form an anti-twist stop with reference to the longitudinal axes and for the orienting means of the bearing to be in the form of a groove and the orienting means of the counter-bearing to be in the form of a projection, while the groove and the projection can be caused to interconnect in the circumferential direction to form an anti-twist stop.
- the formation of the stop means as a groove and a projection or tongue can be a simple variant of possible stop means.
- the projection or tongue need not extend over the entire length of the groove. It can suffice if the projection extends only over a portion of the length of the bearing so that the connection between the bearing and the counter-bearing with reference to the interacting surfaces can be effected stepwise.
- the bearing and the counter-bearing so as to be interplugged, the bearing being in the form of a cylinder and the counter-bearing in the form of a piston.
- the piston can thus be pushed into the cylinder in a simple manner.
- the aforementioned orienting means for example the groove and the projection, can serve as stop means for alignment in the circumferential direction.
- the first and second stop limit surfaces can define the remaining final degree of freedom in the axial direction so that in all a five-point bearing between the inspection part and the supporting member is provided.
- the connecting geometry of the measuring body incorporates a spigot adapted to engage a depression in the implant.
- the spigot can transfer the axial alignment of the implant to the supporting member.
- the remaining part of the connecting geometry can mainly serve to transfer the position data of the implant relating to its axial height and angular position with reference to the longitudinal axis.
- the inspection part and the supporting member are, after joining, irremovably connected to each other.
- the supporting member and the inspection part can then be independently developed and fabricated, and finally, the measuring body can be converted to a single entity by combining the two parts by, say, a mechanical forcing, plugging, or injecting mechanism.
- Another object of the invention relates to a method for generating a measured 3D image of a measuring body disposed on an implant.
- the method of the invention involves the use of a measuring body as described above, and the implant to be used is selected from a number of various types of implant.
- On the implant there is mounted a supporting member matching the type of implant used.
- a standardized inspection part fabricated independently of the supporting member is connected to the supporting member and placed in the implant, and then the measuring geometry of the mounted inspection part is imaged by means of the scanning camera.
- the inspection part is aligned by the orienting means relatively to the supporting member in the circumferential direction about the longitudinal axis.
- the angular position of the implant as has been communicated to the supporting member via the connecting geometry and from the supporting member to the inspection part, can thus be registered by the scanning camera.
- the supporting member can be aligned relatively to the implant in the circumferential direction with respect to the longitudinal axis by means of the connecting geometry.
- first stop limit surface and the second stop limit surface are moved together in the direction of the longitudinal axis so as to abut each other.
- FIG. 1 is a section of a jaw model including a restoration site and two adjacent teeth;
- FIG. 2 is a perspective illustration of the measuring body
- FIG. 3 is a perspective illustration of the measuring body and of the implant located in the jaw.
- FIG. 4 shows an alternative inspection part.
- a measuring body 1 comprising an inspection part 2 and a supporting member 3 , is in position on an implant 4 screwed into a model of a jaw 5 at a restoration site.
- the inspection part 2 has a measuring geometry 2 . 5 as shown in FIG. 2 , which measuring geometry is recorded by a scanning camera 6 held above the model.
- the measuring body 1 illustrated in FIG. 2 comprises the supporting member 3 , into which the inspection part 2 can be inserted.
- the supporting member 3 has a bearing 3 . 1 in the form of a cylinder.
- the inspection part 2 has a counter-bearing 2 . 1 in the form of a piston which can be inserted in the cylinder 3 . 1 .
- Both the piston 2 . 1 and the cylinder 3 . 1 have a longitudinal axis 2 . 2 , 3 . 2 , which axes run coaxially to each other in the inserted state.
- the inspection part 2 has the measuring geometry 2 . 5 on its end opposing the bearing 2 . 1 , which measuring geometry consists of three semispherical partial geometries disposed on an end face 2 . 8 .
- a head 2 . 7 of the inspection part 2 has a diameter greater than that of the piston 2 . 1 .
- the transition area between the head 2 . 7 and the piston 2 . 1 is in the form of a second stop limit surface 2 . 3 which, in the inserted state, can be brought to bear against an end-face first stop limit surface 3 . 3 of the cylinder 3 . 1 .
- Both the piston 2 . 1 and the cylinder 3 . 1 exhibit orienting means 2 . 4 , 3 . 4 .
- the orienting means 2 . 4 of the piston 2 . 1 is in the form of a projection, while the orienting means 3 . 4 of the cylinder 3 . 1 is in the form of a groove to form a tongue and groove connection.
- the projection 2 . 4 extends over only part of the height H of the piston 2 . 1 such that the piston 2 . 1 can first of all be inserted into the cylinder 3 . 1 and can only then, by aligning the piston 2 . 1 and cylinder 3 . 1 in the circumferential direction relative to the longitudinal axis 2 . 2 , 3 . 2 , be pushed in causing contact between the orienting means 2 . 4 , 3 . 4 .
- the supporting member 3 has, as shown in FIG. 3 , on its side opposing the inspection part 2 , a connecting geometry 3 . 5 which matches the connecting geometry 4 . 1 of the implant 4 .
- the connecting geometry 3 . 5 , 4 . 1 is in this case hexagonal, whilst the connecting geometry 3 . 5 , 4 . 1 is in the form of a recess on the side of the supporting member and an eminence on the side of the implant.
- the connecting geometry 3 . 5 also has a spigot 3 . 6 , which can be inserted into a threaded bore 4 . 2 of the implant 4 .
- the spigot 3 . 6 is coaxial with the longitudinal axis 3 . 2 .
- the spigot 3 . 6 is coaxial with the threaded bore 4 . 2 and thus coaxial with a longitudinal axis 4 . 3 of the implant 4 .
- the axial alignment between the measuring body 1 and the implant 4 is effected mainly via the spigot 3 . 6 and the threaded bore 4 . 2 , while the orientation in the vertical axial direction, i.e. relating to distance, and also the orientation in the circumferential direction are mainly achieved via the connecting geometries 3 . 5 , 4 . 1 and their stop limit surfaces.
- the implant 4 is screwed into the model of the jaw 5 via a threaded bore 4 . 4 .
- the inspection part 2 ′ illustrated in FIG. 4 can, like the inspection part 2 shown in FIG. 2 , be attached to the supporting member 3 shown in FIG. 2 . It has a similar measuring geometry 2 . 5 , in which the three semispherical partial geometries are of different sizes, the differences relative to the inspection part 2 being sufficiently large, however, to make it possible to ascertain which of the two inspection parts 2 , 2 ′ is currently in use.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Dentistry (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Orthopedic Medicine & Surgery (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Optics & Photonics (AREA)
- Prostheses (AREA)
- Dental Tools And Instruments Or Auxiliary Dental Instruments (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This application is a continuation of International Application No. PCT/EP2008/066044, filed Nov. 21, 2008, which in turn claims the benefit of priority based on German Patent Application No. 10 2007 056820.9, filed Nov. 23, 2007, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, as if set forth fully herein. International Application No. PCT/EP2008/066044 has been published in German, but not English, as International Publication No. WO 2009/065954 A1, on May 28, 2009.
- The invention relates to a measuring body for an implant, comprising a measuring geometry detectable by a scanning camera and a connecting geometry for the implant.
- The invention further relates to a method for generating a measured 3D image of a measuring body mounted on an implant, and the implant to be used is selected from a number of various types of implant.
- In the case of CAD/CAM assisted provision of jaw implants, a freshly inserted or already healed implant is fitted with a temporary measuring body to indicate the orientation and position of the implant at a level above the region of the jaw or gingiva. This method is also used for implant analogs placed in plaster models. With the aid of a surface scan of the situation it is possible, by means of special algorithms, to recognize the exposed shape of the measuring body automatically and to compute its orientation and position. Since its geometrical shape is precisely known, the orientation of the implant and its position can be computed that are hidden in the jaw, in the gingiva, or in the model and are not directly visible in a surface scan of the situation. It is then possible to design an appropriate dental prosthetic item by means of CAD/CAM.
- A large number of greatly varying implant shapes are available on the market, these differing, inter alia, mainly in the diameter and connecting geometry of the mounted dental prosthetic item, for example an abutment.
- Hitherto, a completely new, single-piece measuring body has been fabricated for each required implant shape. Some manufacturers use extended screws in the implant for this purpose. Although it has hitherto been possible to keep the upper part of the body in most cases geometrically identical, it has still had to be freshly fabricated together with the fixed bottom part of the measuring body, for example using an injection mold. Each fresh measuring body has required a separate individual fabrication process. In such cases it has been necessary to create individual patterns in elaborate production steps and these have had to be measured for accuracy until the required fit was achieved. There is thus the risk that, even when the top part retains the same geometrical shape, there will nevertheless be slight unintentional dimensional discrepancies depending on the mold used. The production and completion of the whole part are the responsibility of the developer of the CAD/CAM dental software for finding the measuring body in the surface scan and then producing a tooth restoration.
- Measuring bodies are disclosed in DE 694 13 852 T2. The measuring bodies are formed as a single piece and exhibit a shaft, at one end of which the measuring geometry is disposed and at its other end there is provided a spigot, by means of which the measuring body is fitted to the implant.
- EP 0 599 578 A2 discloses a measuring body with a measuring geometry and an auxiliary measuring body which is attachable to the main measuring body. When measurement within the mouth is not possible, the auxiliary measuring body is mounted on the main measuring body so that the auxiliary measuring body forms the inspection part and can be recorded by the impression compound subsequently introduced. The auxiliary measuring body has a measuring geometry on its underside projecting from the impression compound so that the position and alignment of the auxiliary measuring body within the impression can be determined. No provision is made for measurement of the auxiliary body mounted on the implant.
- Furthermore, DE 10 2004 035 091 A1 discloses measuring elements having a measuring geometry and provided with a connecting geometry for the implant. The measuring elements are fixed via the connecting geometry to the implant so that the alignment of the implant axis on the one hand and the position of the connecting geometry on the other hand can be deduced from the measuring geometry.
- It is an object of the invention to design and configure a measuring body such that reduced manufacturing costs are incurred.
- According to the Invention, the measuring geometry is disposed on an inspection part and the connecting geometry on a supporting member and both the inspection part and the supporting member are in the form of separate components, and the supporting member has a bearing for the inspection part and the inspection part has a counter-bearing matching said bearing and the measuring geometry is provided on a free end of the inspection part mounted on said supporting member.
- When the inspection part is in the mounted state, the measuring geometry faces the scanning camera. This means that the inspection part can be developed and fabricated independently of the supporting member. In the case of varying types of implant, it is necessary to appropriately redesign and re-make the supporting member. This can take place, according to the invention, irrespectively of designing or fabricating the inspection part. The design of the inspection part substantially depends on the measuring geometry and the evaluation software developed for this purpose, which can remain unchanged despite adaptation of the measuring body to new types of implant by modification of the supporting member.
- The development effort for the software when adding new implant shapes for support thereby is reduced. Furthermore, alteration of the inspection part, for example, for the purpose of improving software-assisted position finding, has no influence on the supporting member.
- The provision of a separate inspection part reduces the development effort for the hardware, that is to say, for the overall measuring body. Since the measuring body is a precision-made part which has to be fabricated to a tolerance of a few μm, the development effort for the production of a mold or of a machine adapted for fabrication of the inspection part of the measuring body occurs only once. Only the supporting member must be redeveloped and re-made for each new implant shape to be supported.
- It is also possible to evade the fabrication of the supporting member by relaying the geometrical fitting requirements of the inspection part to other connecting geometries. Thus, for example, the inspection part can be produced, and the associated surface recognition algorithm developed by the software developer, while the supporting member is manufactured by the producer of the respective implant shape. Another advantage consists in that the supporting member of the measuring body can be composed of an arbitrary material when used in the mouth of a patient, that is, for example, a food-grade material, whilst the inspection part can be formed from a readily scannable material. Thus it is possible, for example, to employ the supporting member a number of times using disinfectable materials.
- The invention makes it possible, as explained above, to simplify and segregate the sequence of operations required for the production of a new measuring body for detection of the position and orientation of an implant placed in the jawbone. The software-based and hardware-(tool)-based development costs are both reduced.
- Advantageously, the bearing has a longitudinal axis and a first stop limit surface effective in the direction of the longitudinal axis and the counter-bearing has a longitudinal axis and a second stop limit surface effective in the direction of said longitudinal axis, and the first stop limit surface and the second stop limit surface can be caused to abut each other in the axial direction of the longitudinal axes. The stop limit surfaces can preferably be normal to the longitudinal axis such that radial contact between the bearing and the counter-bearing does not come about via the stop limit surfaces. In addition to the stop limit surfaces, other guide surfaces parallel to the longitudinal axis can be provided to ensure radial guidance between the bearing and the counter-bearing.
- It may also be advantageous when the supporting member exhibits a connecting geometry which corresponds to the connecting geometry of the implant. It is usually desirable to connect the measuring body to the connecting geometry of the implant, in order not only to detect the axial alignment of the implant but also to register the angular position of the connecting geometry of the implant.
- It may also be advantageous when the bearing and the counter-bearing have orienting means to ensure perfect orientation in the circumferential direction relative to the longitudinal axes between the supporting member and the inspection part. With alignment of the supporting member toward the connecting geometry of the implant it can now be advantageous to transmit the position of the inspection part relative to the supporting member at least in the circumferential direction unambiguously via the aforementioned orienting means.
- On the other hand it may be advantageous for the orienting means to be in the form of stop means or stop limit surfaces and to form an anti-twist stop with reference to the longitudinal axes and for the orienting means of the bearing to be in the form of a groove and the orienting means of the counter-bearing to be in the form of a projection, while the groove and the projection can be caused to interconnect in the circumferential direction to form an anti-twist stop. The formation of the stop means as a groove and a projection or tongue can be a simple variant of possible stop means. The projection or tongue need not extend over the entire length of the groove. It can suffice if the projection extends only over a portion of the length of the bearing so that the connection between the bearing and the counter-bearing with reference to the interacting surfaces can be effected stepwise.
- Furthermore, it can be of advantage to adapt the bearing and the counter-bearing so as to be interplugged, the bearing being in the form of a cylinder and the counter-bearing in the form of a piston. The piston can thus be pushed into the cylinder in a simple manner. By this means at least radial guidance between the bearing and counter-bearing is ensured. The aforementioned orienting means, for example the groove and the projection, can serve as stop means for alignment in the circumferential direction. The first and second stop limit surfaces can define the remaining final degree of freedom in the axial direction so that in all a five-point bearing between the inspection part and the supporting member is provided.
- It may also be advantageous when the connecting geometry of the measuring body incorporates a spigot adapted to engage a depression in the implant. The spigot can transfer the axial alignment of the implant to the supporting member. The remaining part of the connecting geometry can mainly serve to transfer the position data of the implant relating to its axial height and angular position with reference to the longitudinal axis.
- It may also be advantageous when the inspection part and the supporting member are, after joining, irremovably connected to each other. The supporting member and the inspection part can then be independently developed and fabricated, and finally, the measuring body can be converted to a single entity by combining the two parts by, say, a mechanical forcing, plugging, or injecting mechanism.
- Another object of the invention relates to a method for generating a measured 3D image of a measuring body disposed on an implant. The method of the invention involves the use of a measuring body as described above, and the implant to be used is selected from a number of various types of implant. On the implant there is mounted a supporting member matching the type of implant used. A standardized inspection part fabricated independently of the supporting member is connected to the supporting member and placed in the implant, and then the measuring geometry of the mounted inspection part is imaged by means of the scanning camera.
- According to an alternative invention, it is possible to first place the inspection part on the supporting member matching the type of implant and then to place the resulting measuring body on the implant, after which the measuring geometry of the inspection part is imaged, in the mounted state, by means of the camera.
- In this context it may be of advantage when the inspection part is aligned by the orienting means relatively to the supporting member in the circumferential direction about the longitudinal axis. In this case the angular position of the implant, as has been communicated to the supporting member via the connecting geometry and from the supporting member to the inspection part, can thus be registered by the scanning camera.
- Furthermore it can be of advantage for the supporting member to be aligned relatively to the implant in the circumferential direction with respect to the longitudinal axis by means of the connecting geometry.
- Likewise, it can be of advantage when the first stop limit surface and the second stop limit surface are moved together in the direction of the longitudinal axis so as to abut each other.
- Exemplary embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the drawings, in which:
-
FIG. 1 is a section of a jaw model including a restoration site and two adjacent teeth; -
FIG. 2 is a perspective illustration of the measuring body; -
FIG. 3 is a perspective illustration of the measuring body and of the implant located in the jaw; and -
FIG. 4 shows an alternative inspection part. - A measuring
body 1 comprising aninspection part 2 and a supportingmember 3, is in position on animplant 4 screwed into a model of ajaw 5 at a restoration site. Theinspection part 2 has a measuring geometry 2.5 as shown inFIG. 2 , which measuring geometry is recorded by ascanning camera 6 held above the model. - The measuring
body 1 illustrated inFIG. 2 comprises the supportingmember 3, into which theinspection part 2 can be inserted. The supportingmember 3 has a bearing 3.1 in the form of a cylinder. Theinspection part 2 has a counter-bearing 2.1 in the form of a piston which can be inserted in the cylinder 3.1. Both the piston 2.1 and the cylinder 3.1 have a longitudinal axis 2.2, 3.2, which axes run coaxially to each other in the inserted state. Theinspection part 2 has the measuring geometry 2.5 on its end opposing the bearing 2.1, which measuring geometry consists of three semispherical partial geometries disposed on an end face 2.8. A head 2.7 of theinspection part 2 has a diameter greater than that of the piston 2.1. The transition area between the head 2.7 and the piston 2.1 is in the form of a second stop limit surface 2.3 which, in the inserted state, can be brought to bear against an end-face first stop limit surface 3.3 of the cylinder 3.1. - Both the piston 2.1 and the cylinder 3.1 exhibit orienting means 2.4, 3.4. The orienting means 2.4 of the piston 2.1 is in the form of a projection, while the orienting means 3.4 of the cylinder 3.1 is in the form of a groove to form a tongue and groove connection. The projection 2.4 extends over only part of the height H of the piston 2.1 such that the piston 2.1 can first of all be inserted into the cylinder 3.1 and can only then, by aligning the piston 2.1 and cylinder 3.1 in the circumferential direction relative to the longitudinal axis 2.2, 3.2, be pushed in causing contact between the orienting means 2.4, 3.4.
- The supporting
member 3 has, as shown inFIG. 3 , on its side opposing theinspection part 2, a connecting geometry 3.5 which matches the connecting geometry 4.1 of theimplant 4. The connecting geometry 3.5, 4.1 is in this case hexagonal, whilst the connecting geometry 3.5, 4.1 is in the form of a recess on the side of the supporting member and an eminence on the side of the implant. - The connecting geometry 3.5 also has a spigot 3.6, which can be inserted into a threaded bore 4.2 of the
implant 4. The spigot 3.6 is coaxial with the longitudinal axis 3.2. In its inserted state inside the threaded bore 4.2, the spigot 3.6 is coaxial with the threaded bore 4.2 and thus coaxial with a longitudinal axis 4.3 of theimplant 4. The axial alignment between the measuringbody 1 and theimplant 4 is effected mainly via the spigot 3.6 and the threaded bore 4.2, while the orientation in the vertical axial direction, i.e. relating to distance, and also the orientation in the circumferential direction are mainly achieved via the connecting geometries 3.5, 4.1 and their stop limit surfaces. - The
implant 4 is screwed into the model of thejaw 5 via a threaded bore 4.4. - The
inspection part 2′ illustrated inFIG. 4 can, like theinspection part 2 shown inFIG. 2 , be attached to the supportingmember 3 shown inFIG. 2 . It has a similar measuring geometry 2.5, in which the three semispherical partial geometries are of different sizes, the differences relative to theinspection part 2 being sufficiently large, however, to make it possible to ascertain which of the twoinspection parts -
- 1 measuring body
- 2 inspection part, component
- 2′ inspection part, component
- 2.1 counter-bearing, piston
- 2.2 longitudinal axis
- 2.3 second stop limit surface
- 2.4 orientation means, stop means, stop limit surface, tongue, projection
- 2.5 measuring geometry
- 2.6 free end
- 2.7 head
- 2.8 end face
- 3 supporting member, component
- 3.1 bearing, cylinder
- 3.2 longitudinal axis
- 3.3 first stop limit surface
- 3.4 orientation means, stop means, stop limit surfaces, groove
- 3.5 connecting geometry
- 3.6 spigot
- 4 implant
- 4.1 connecting geometry
- 4.2 threaded bore, groove
- 4.3 longitudinal axis
- 4.4 threaded bore
- 5 jaw
- 6 scanning camera
- H height
Claims (15)
Applications Claiming Priority (4)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102007056820A DE102007056820A1 (en) | 2007-11-23 | 2007-11-23 | Measuring body for an implant and method for creating a 3D measurement recording |
DE102007056820.9 | 2007-11-23 | ||
DE102007056820 | 2007-11-23 | ||
PCT/EP2008/066044 WO2009065954A1 (en) | 2007-11-23 | 2008-11-21 | Measuring body for an implant and method for providing a 3d-measurement drawing |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2008/066044 Continuation WO2009065954A1 (en) | 2007-11-23 | 2008-11-21 | Measuring body for an implant and method for providing a 3d-measurement drawing |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20100296710A1 true US20100296710A1 (en) | 2010-11-25 |
US8275184B2 US8275184B2 (en) | 2012-09-25 |
Family
ID=40578231
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/785,282 Active 2029-04-24 US8275184B2 (en) | 2007-11-23 | 2010-05-21 | Measuring body for an implant and method for providing A 3D measurement drawing |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8275184B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2211755B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP5548134B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101535787B1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE102007056820A1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK2211755T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2009065954A1 (en) |
Cited By (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20120141951A1 (en) * | 2010-12-07 | 2012-06-07 | Biomet 3I, Llc | Universal scanning member for use on dental implant and dental implant analogs |
JP2012115668A (en) * | 2010-11-29 | 2012-06-21 | Nt-Trading Gmbh & Co Kg | Scanbody for determining position and orientation of dental implant |
WO2014015932A1 (en) * | 2012-07-27 | 2014-01-30 | Nobel Biocare Services Ag | Method for making a dental component |
EP2700377A1 (en) * | 2012-08-20 | 2014-02-26 | Heraeus Kulzer GmbH | Scannable body for determining the orientation and position of a dental implant |
EP2756817A1 (en) * | 2013-01-22 | 2014-07-23 | Lange, Axel | Method for creating a virtual, three-dimensional whole jaw model characteristic for the mouth of a patient and marker body for use in the method |
US20140234801A1 (en) * | 2013-02-19 | 2014-08-21 | Biomet 3I, Llc | Patient-Specific Dental Prosthesis And Gingival Contouring Developed By Predictive Modeling |
EP3130310A1 (en) * | 2015-08-11 | 2017-02-15 | Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen | Scanning aid and method of scanning an object |
WO2017029670A1 (en) * | 2015-08-17 | 2017-02-23 | Optical Metrology Ltd. | Intra-oral mapping of edentulous or partially edentulous mouth cavities |
US20170112598A1 (en) * | 2015-10-21 | 2017-04-27 | Biomet 31, Llc | Attachment members with internally located radiopaque information markers for ct scan |
US9763758B2 (en) | 2011-01-13 | 2017-09-19 | Align Technology, Inc. | Virtual and physical dental models of dental surfaces and analog socket structure of a dental implant and related procedures |
WO2018091506A1 (en) * | 2016-11-18 | 2018-05-24 | Curd Gadau | Scan body for a laboratory analog system |
US10080636B2 (en) | 2012-05-07 | 2018-09-25 | Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh | Method for measuring a dental situation |
CN109475395A (en) * | 2016-07-21 | 2019-03-15 | 西诺德牙科设备有限公司 | For measuring planting body-planting body state measuring system and method |
US10390910B2 (en) | 2013-03-28 | 2019-08-27 | Dentsply Sirona Inc. | Integrated dental implant component and tool for placement of a dental implant component |
US10816955B2 (en) * | 2014-06-05 | 2020-10-27 | Ivoclar Vivadent Ag | Process and device for manufacturing a dental restoration |
US11337774B2 (en) * | 2016-04-20 | 2022-05-24 | Axel Scheffer | Method and system for detecting the alignment of at least one drill sleeve in a drill template produced for implanting dental implants in the correct position |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2011034780A1 (en) * | 2009-09-15 | 2011-03-24 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Dental implant abutments and methods of use |
EP2324793A1 (en) | 2009-11-19 | 2011-05-25 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | A method and a system in the preparation of a dental restoration, a measuring element and use thereof |
IT1399379B1 (en) * | 2010-03-16 | 2013-04-16 | Simbiosi S R L | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR THE REALIZATION OF A DENTAL PROSTHESIS. |
DE102011115031A1 (en) * | 2011-10-07 | 2013-04-11 | Heraeus Kulzer Gmbh | Laboratory implant with indexing for insertion in plastic models |
JP5937401B2 (en) * | 2012-03-29 | 2016-06-22 | 株式会社ジーシー | Scanning jig |
DE102012105552A1 (en) * | 2012-06-26 | 2014-01-16 | Peter NEUMEIER | Device for registering position and situation of implant, has end area and another end area lying opposite to former end area, where central area partially extended along longitudinal axis is arranged between both end areas |
EP2865352A4 (en) * | 2012-06-26 | 2016-01-20 | G C Dental Ind Corp | Scanning jig |
US8905757B2 (en) | 2012-12-03 | 2014-12-09 | E. Kats Enterprises Ltd. | Method and apparatus for measuring a location and orientation of a plurality of implants |
EP2842493B1 (en) | 2013-08-30 | 2016-04-06 | Zfx GmbH | Intraoral reference body |
DE102014102923A1 (en) * | 2014-03-05 | 2015-09-10 | Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München | Insertion post, system and method for detecting the position of an implanted implant |
AT15364U3 (en) * | 2016-09-05 | 2018-01-15 | Bloier Karl | scanbody |
US20220183800A1 (en) * | 2020-12-10 | 2022-06-16 | Milan Madhavji | Scan bodies for digital impressions and systems, indicia, and methods of using scan bodies |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5401170A (en) * | 1992-11-25 | 1995-03-28 | Kabushiki Kaisha Egawa | Measuring device and measuring method of implant structure |
US5857853A (en) * | 1993-07-26 | 1999-01-12 | Nobel Biocare Ab | Method of manufacturing a prosthesis to be fixed to implants in the jawbone of a patient, and a system for manufacturing such prostheses |
US6558162B1 (en) * | 1999-11-10 | 2003-05-06 | Implant Innovations, Inc. | Healing components for use in taking impressions and methods for making the same |
US6788986B1 (en) * | 1999-06-21 | 2004-09-07 | Dcs Forschungs & Entwicklungs Ag | Method for producing an individually made, implant-supported tooth replacement |
US6925198B2 (en) * | 2002-05-24 | 2005-08-02 | Ronald S. Scharlack | Method and system for three-dimensional modeling of object fields |
US20060019219A1 (en) * | 2004-07-20 | 2006-01-26 | Gunter Saliger | Method to determine position and orientation of the axis of a dental implant disposed directly in the mouth of the patient as well as a mounting piece |
US20080206710A1 (en) * | 2005-01-25 | 2008-08-28 | Jean-Pierre Kruth | Procedure for Design and Production of Implant-Based Frameworks for Complex Dental Prostheses |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5681167A (en) * | 1996-01-05 | 1997-10-28 | Lazarof; Sargon | Dental assembly and process for preparing a tooth prosthesis |
US6790040B2 (en) * | 1999-11-10 | 2004-09-14 | Implant Innovations, Inc. | Healing components for use in taking impressions and methods for making the same |
BE1015916A3 (en) * | 2004-02-25 | 2005-11-08 | Clerck Rene De | MARKING ELEMENT AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE POSITION OF A dental implant. |
-
2007
- 2007-11-23 DE DE102007056820A patent/DE102007056820A1/en active Pending
-
2008
- 2008-11-21 KR KR1020107013203A patent/KR101535787B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2008-11-21 JP JP2010534496A patent/JP5548134B2/en active Active
- 2008-11-21 WO PCT/EP2008/066044 patent/WO2009065954A1/en active Application Filing
- 2008-11-21 DK DK08852535.7T patent/DK2211755T3/en active
- 2008-11-21 EP EP08852535.7A patent/EP2211755B1/en not_active Revoked
-
2010
- 2010-05-21 US US12/785,282 patent/US8275184B2/en active Active
Patent Citations (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5401170A (en) * | 1992-11-25 | 1995-03-28 | Kabushiki Kaisha Egawa | Measuring device and measuring method of implant structure |
US5857853A (en) * | 1993-07-26 | 1999-01-12 | Nobel Biocare Ab | Method of manufacturing a prosthesis to be fixed to implants in the jawbone of a patient, and a system for manufacturing such prostheses |
US6287119B1 (en) * | 1993-07-26 | 2001-09-11 | Nobel Biocare Ab | Method of manufacturing a prosthesis to be fixed to implants in the jawbone of a patient, and a system for manufacturing such prostheses |
US6788986B1 (en) * | 1999-06-21 | 2004-09-07 | Dcs Forschungs & Entwicklungs Ag | Method for producing an individually made, implant-supported tooth replacement |
US6558162B1 (en) * | 1999-11-10 | 2003-05-06 | Implant Innovations, Inc. | Healing components for use in taking impressions and methods for making the same |
US6925198B2 (en) * | 2002-05-24 | 2005-08-02 | Ronald S. Scharlack | Method and system for three-dimensional modeling of object fields |
US20060019219A1 (en) * | 2004-07-20 | 2006-01-26 | Gunter Saliger | Method to determine position and orientation of the axis of a dental implant disposed directly in the mouth of the patient as well as a mounting piece |
US20080206710A1 (en) * | 2005-01-25 | 2008-08-28 | Jean-Pierre Kruth | Procedure for Design and Production of Implant-Based Frameworks for Complex Dental Prostheses |
Cited By (27)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP2012115668A (en) * | 2010-11-29 | 2012-06-21 | Nt-Trading Gmbh & Co Kg | Scanbody for determining position and orientation of dental implant |
US9662185B2 (en) | 2010-12-07 | 2017-05-30 | Biomet 3I, Llc | Universal scanning member for use on dental implant and dental implant analogs |
US20120141951A1 (en) * | 2010-12-07 | 2012-06-07 | Biomet 3I, Llc | Universal scanning member for use on dental implant and dental implant analogs |
US8882508B2 (en) * | 2010-12-07 | 2014-11-11 | Biomet 3I, Llc | Universal scanning member for use on dental implant and dental implant analogs |
US11369459B2 (en) | 2011-01-13 | 2022-06-28 | Align Technology, Inc. | Virtual and physical dental models of dental surfaces and analog socket structure of a dental implant and related procedures |
US9763758B2 (en) | 2011-01-13 | 2017-09-19 | Align Technology, Inc. | Virtual and physical dental models of dental surfaces and analog socket structure of a dental implant and related procedures |
US10675130B2 (en) | 2011-01-13 | 2020-06-09 | Align Technology, Inc. | Virtual and physical dental models of dental surfaces and analog socket structure of a dental implant and related procedures |
US10080636B2 (en) | 2012-05-07 | 2018-09-25 | Sirona Dental Systems Gmbh | Method for measuring a dental situation |
WO2014015932A1 (en) * | 2012-07-27 | 2014-01-30 | Nobel Biocare Services Ag | Method for making a dental component |
EP2700377A1 (en) * | 2012-08-20 | 2014-02-26 | Heraeus Kulzer GmbH | Scannable body for determining the orientation and position of a dental implant |
CN105142564A (en) * | 2012-08-20 | 2015-12-09 | 黑罗伊斯库尔策有限公司 | Scannable body for determining the orientation and position of a dental implant |
US20150209122A1 (en) * | 2012-08-20 | 2015-07-30 | Heraeus Kulzer Gmbh | Scannable body for determining the orientation and position of a dental implant |
WO2014029461A1 (en) * | 2012-08-20 | 2014-02-27 | Heraeus Kulzer Gmbh | Scannable body for determining the orientation and position of a dental implant |
EP2756817A1 (en) * | 2013-01-22 | 2014-07-23 | Lange, Axel | Method for creating a virtual, three-dimensional whole jaw model characteristic for the mouth of a patient and marker body for use in the method |
US9839496B2 (en) * | 2013-02-19 | 2017-12-12 | Biomet 3I, Llc | Patient-specific dental prosthesis and gingival contouring developed by predictive modeling |
US20140234801A1 (en) * | 2013-02-19 | 2014-08-21 | Biomet 3I, Llc | Patient-Specific Dental Prosthesis And Gingival Contouring Developed By Predictive Modeling |
US10959816B2 (en) | 2013-02-19 | 2021-03-30 | Biomet 3I, Llc | Patient-specific dental prosthesis and gingival contouring developed by predictive modeling |
US10390910B2 (en) | 2013-03-28 | 2019-08-27 | Dentsply Sirona Inc. | Integrated dental implant component and tool for placement of a dental implant component |
US10816955B2 (en) * | 2014-06-05 | 2020-10-27 | Ivoclar Vivadent Ag | Process and device for manufacturing a dental restoration |
EP3130310A1 (en) * | 2015-08-11 | 2017-02-15 | Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen | Scanning aid and method of scanning an object |
WO2017029670A1 (en) * | 2015-08-17 | 2017-02-23 | Optical Metrology Ltd. | Intra-oral mapping of edentulous or partially edentulous mouth cavities |
US20170112598A1 (en) * | 2015-10-21 | 2017-04-27 | Biomet 31, Llc | Attachment members with internally located radiopaque information markers for ct scan |
US10327869B2 (en) * | 2015-10-21 | 2019-06-25 | Biomet 3I, Llc | Attachment members with internally located radiopaque information markers for CT scan |
US11890164B2 (en) * | 2015-10-21 | 2024-02-06 | Biomet 3I, Llc | Attachment members with internally located radiopaque information markers for CT scan |
US11337774B2 (en) * | 2016-04-20 | 2022-05-24 | Axel Scheffer | Method and system for detecting the alignment of at least one drill sleeve in a drill template produced for implanting dental implants in the correct position |
CN109475395A (en) * | 2016-07-21 | 2019-03-15 | 西诺德牙科设备有限公司 | For measuring planting body-planting body state measuring system and method |
WO2018091506A1 (en) * | 2016-11-18 | 2018-05-24 | Curd Gadau | Scan body for a laboratory analog system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2211755A1 (en) | 2010-08-04 |
DE102007056820A1 (en) | 2009-06-18 |
JP5548134B2 (en) | 2014-07-16 |
KR20100099176A (en) | 2010-09-10 |
EP2211755B1 (en) | 2014-05-07 |
DK2211755T3 (en) | 2014-06-23 |
WO2009065954A1 (en) | 2009-05-28 |
US8275184B2 (en) | 2012-09-25 |
KR101535787B1 (en) | 2015-07-10 |
JP2011504390A (en) | 2011-02-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US8275184B2 (en) | Measuring body for an implant and method for providing A 3D measurement drawing | |
US10159545B2 (en) | Scanbody | |
Tan et al. | Comparison of three-dimensional accuracy of digital and conventional implant impressions: effect of interimplant distance in an edentulous arch | |
CA2615461C (en) | Method and device for producing dental prosthetic elements | |
US8308481B2 (en) | Dental framework | |
US8011925B2 (en) | Methods for manufacturing dental implant components | |
US8662890B2 (en) | Method for manufacturing a dental restoration | |
JP4451274B2 (en) | Measuring object wearing tool and method for producing three-dimensional shape data of dental prosthesis using the same | |
Jang et al. | Accuracy of impressions for internal-connection implant prostheses with various divergent angles. | |
US20060019219A1 (en) | Method to determine position and orientation of the axis of a dental implant disposed directly in the mouth of the patient as well as a mounting piece | |
CN1166915C (en) | Method of measuring limb parts and matching them to prosthetic or orthotic parts | |
JPH11216150A (en) | Artificial tooth material, method and device to determine shape of soring area of tooth where artificial tooth is installed and manufacturing method and machine for artificial tooth and method for using the machine | |
Liu et al. | Accuracy of multi-implant impressions using 3D-printing custom trays and splinting versus conventional techniques for complete arches. | |
CA3030517A1 (en) | Measuring system and method for measuring an implant-implant situation | |
US20050019728A1 (en) | Method for the manufacture of dental prosthesis frameworks of the type screwed to a plurality of osteo-integrated implants in the mandibular or maxillary bone | |
Park et al. | The effect of the improperly scanned scan body images on the accuracy of virtual implant positioning in computer-aided design software | |
Kim et al. | Displacement of scan body during screw tightening: A comparative in vitro study | |
Jeon et al. | Trueness and precision of scanning abutment impressions and stone models according to dental CAD/CAM evaluation standards | |
CN100336492C (en) | Method for manufacturing a dental restoration element | |
KR20190025083A (en) | manufacturing method and system for digital denture, and denture hole guider applied to thereof and manufacturing method | |
JP2010221034A (en) | Method for producing abutment | |
Pozzi et al. | Accuracy of intraoral optical scan versus stereophotogrammetry for complete-arch digital implant impression: An in vitro study | |
KR102034416B1 (en) | Manufacturing method of ultra precision dental prosthesis using CT scanner for dental use and ultra precision dental prosthesis | |
EP3649984B1 (en) | Digital denture manufacturing method and manufacturing system, and denture hole guider applied thereto and manufacturing method thereof | |
Nedelcu et al. | In vivo trueness of full-arch implant-supported CAD/CAM restorations and models based on conventional impressions |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SIRONA DENTAL SYSTEMS GMBH, GERMANY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SCHNEIDER, SASCHA;WEBER, FRANK;SIGNING DATES FROM 20100318 TO 20100322;REEL/FRAME:024433/0216 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Year of fee payment: 12 |