US20090188383A1 - Anti-penetrating Sandwich Structure - Google Patents
Anti-penetrating Sandwich Structure Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20090188383A1 US20090188383A1 US12/234,346 US23434608A US2009188383A1 US 20090188383 A1 US20090188383 A1 US 20090188383A1 US 23434608 A US23434608 A US 23434608A US 2009188383 A1 US2009188383 A1 US 2009188383A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- penetrating
- steel structure
- combined steel
- soil
- layer
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 claims 2
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 25
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 description 25
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 20
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 13
- 230000000149 penetrating effect Effects 0.000 description 10
- 229920006351 engineering plastic Polymers 0.000 description 9
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000011150 reinforced concrete Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000021715 photosynthesis, light harvesting Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000004856 soil analysis Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012916 structural analysis Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000853 adhesive Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001070 adhesive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003139 buffering effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003252 repetitive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012827 research and development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011800 void material Substances 0.000 description 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000003466 welding Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H5/00—Armour; Armour plates
- F41H5/24—Armour; Armour plates for stationary use, e.g. fortifications ; Shelters; Guard Booths
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F41—WEAPONS
- F41H—ARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
- F41H5/00—Armour; Armour plates
- F41H5/02—Plate construction
- F41H5/04—Plate construction composed of more than one layer
- F41H5/0442—Layered armour containing metal
- F41H5/0457—Metal layers in combination with additional layers made of fibres, fabrics or plastics
Definitions
- the anti-penetrating sandwich structure is built under the ground's surface as a protective measure for buildings underneath it, when under attack by penetrating weapons.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
- Laminated Bodies (AREA)
Abstract
The proposed new structure, Anti-penetrating Sandwich Structure, can protect the building underground.
Description
- The anti-penetrating sandwich structure is built under the ground's surface as a protective measure for buildings underneath it, when under attack by penetrating weapons.
- Important buildings that were constructed underground can survive an attack by external forces. However, the invention of penetrating weapons has increased the difficulty of solving the problem of protecting buildings from the new ordinance. In view of this, the anti-penetrating sandwich structure is built above the underground building to prevent the destruction of the buildings underneath it from attacks which employ penetrating weapons.
-
- I. Structural Materials
- 1. The anti-penetrating sandwich structure built under the ground's surface consists of “Surface soil+parallel combined steel structure (or RC structure)+energy dissipating material+parallel combined steel structure (or RC structure)+energy dissipating material+parallel combined steel structure (or RC structure)+underground seismic building” from top downwards.
- 2. The combined steel structure consists of steel plates or welded section steels. The variations of combined steel structure include the following:
- (1) Welded box beam structure
- (2) Plate girder structure
- (3) Single folded plate structure
- 3. The parallel combined steel structure is a combined steel structure arranged in parallel or piled pattern of design, and then combined through welding.
- 4. Energy dissipating materials
- (1) Engineering plastics
- A. The accurate measurement of elasticity modulus and poisson's ratio is very important in regard to the correctness of the structural analysis.
- B. During research and development of the engineering plastics, it is necessary to consider its flammability, and an experiment on energy dissipation should be performed as test reference.
- (2) Soil
- A. The accurate calculation of elasticity modulus and poisson's ratio is very important in regard to the correctness of the soil analysis.
- B. For selection of sand-gravel, the size gradation of aggregate must be executed according to the soil categorization system, and an experiment on energy dissipation should be performed as test reference.
- (1) Engineering plastics
- 5. When the engineering plastic is used as the energy dissipating material, the thermal expansion coefficient must be considered for adhesion between the engineering plastic and the parallel combined steel structure. Adhesive can be used to compensate for small difference in thermal expansion coefficient; for large difference in thermal expansion coefficient, the parallel combined steel structure can be nailed and then secured together with the engineering plastic.
- II. Structural Shape
- 1. The arch structure is a parallel combined steel structure that exhibits an upward arching pattern.
- 2. The grid beams and panel surface are the structural patterns above the RC (Reinforced Concrete), welded box or section steel grid beams, and are bonded to the parallel combined steel structure with adhesives.
- 3. The plane structure is the combined steel structure arranged in parallel pattern on a plane.
- III. Structural Design
- 1. The objective of structural design is to provide resistance to each layer against the penetrating weapons, so that the energy dissipating materials have sufficient elasticity for shape recovery.
- 2. After the penetrating weapon hits the surface soil, the penetrating force is dispersed downwards to the parallel combined steel structure on the 1st layer where the energy dissipating material on this layer can dissipate the force.
- 3. Structural Design
- (1) Stage 1
- A. Assume that the parallel combined steel structure on the 2nd layer is rigid and that the strength of the parallel combined steel structure on the 1st layer is sufficient to resist the penetration of penetrating weapons, so that the energy dissipating material on the 1st layer can disperse the force to the parallel combined steel structure on the 2nd layer and completely dissipate the penetrating force. Under such prerequisite, the required dimension derived from structural analysis can act as the design basis for the parallel combined steel structure for the 1st layer. For the structural design, please refer to the mechanics of the materials, structural mechanics, structural dynamics and the finite element method. For the soil analysis, please refer to the mechanics of materials, soil mechanics, soil dynamics and the finite element method.
- B. The parallel combined steel structure on the 2nd layer is similar to the parallel combined steel structure on the 1st layer.
- C. For the parallel combined steel structure on the 3rd layer, the energy dissipating material of the lower layers can adopt the following materials:
- i. Engineering plastics
- a. If engineering plastics are used as energy dissipating material on the 1st and 2nd layers, the engineering plastics with the same thickness can be used as the buffering energy dissipating material between the parallel combined steel structure on the 3rd layer and the underground building.
- b. If soil is used as the energy dissipating material on the 1st and 2nd layers, the energy dissipation behavior will involve both elastic and plastic deformation. Please refer to the mechanics of materials, structural mechanics, structural dynamics and the finite element method for structural analysis.
- ii. Soil
- a. If engineering plastics are used as the energy dissipating material on the 1st and 2nd layers, the energy dissipation behavior will involve the draining of the void water, and soil compressiveness. Please refer to the mechanics of materials, soil mechanics, soil dynamics and the finite element method for soil analysis.
- b. If soil is used as the energy dissipating material on the 1st and 2nd layers, soil with the same mixing ratio and thickness can be used as the buffering energy dissipating material between the parallel combined steel structure on the 3rd layer and the underground building.
- i. Engineering plastics
- (2) Stage 2
- Execute the overall analysis on the anti-penetrating sandwich structure to confirm the force status and make further adjustments as necessary.
- (3) Stage 3
- Evaluate the probability of repetitive attack on a fixed point and carry out Stage 1 and 2 analyses, respectively, to confirm the force status and make further adjustments as necessary.
- (1) Stage 1
- 4. Depending on actual requirements, determine if the pile foundation shall be erected at end-points, so that the penetrating force from the penetrating weapon can be dispersed to deeper ground.
- Structure Systems, Heinrich Engel, 1981.
Claims (3)
1. The inventor gets a 2% royalty of the general budget of the central government.
2. The users endow a 6% royalty to medical, environmental, and charity organizations with anonymity; if contributors disclose themselves to the public, the subscription is invalid.
3. If anyone modifies this structure to apply a patent, he/she shall endow a 6% royalty to medical, environmental, and charity organizations with anonymity.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/234,346 US20090188383A1 (en) | 2008-09-19 | 2008-09-19 | Anti-penetrating Sandwich Structure |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/234,346 US20090188383A1 (en) | 2008-09-19 | 2008-09-19 | Anti-penetrating Sandwich Structure |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20090188383A1 true US20090188383A1 (en) | 2009-07-30 |
Family
ID=40897900
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/234,346 Abandoned US20090188383A1 (en) | 2008-09-19 | 2008-09-19 | Anti-penetrating Sandwich Structure |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20090188383A1 (en) |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2311358A (en) * | 1940-11-25 | 1943-02-16 | Baily Robert William | Apparatus and method for molding concrete |
US6698331B1 (en) * | 1999-03-10 | 2004-03-02 | Fraunhofer Usa, Inc. | Use of metal foams in armor systems |
US6703104B1 (en) * | 2002-01-04 | 2004-03-09 | Murray L. Neal | Panel configuration composite armor |
US7026045B2 (en) * | 2001-07-12 | 2006-04-11 | Arc Leichtmetallkompetenzzentrum Ranshofen Gmbh | Multilayer composite armour |
US7350450B1 (en) * | 2006-09-18 | 2008-04-01 | Battelle Energy Alliance, Llc | Armor structures |
US20080141853A1 (en) * | 2006-07-13 | 2008-06-19 | Amos Klein | Protective layer and method for installing same |
US7415806B2 (en) * | 2004-07-08 | 2008-08-26 | Davidson Thomas D | Ballistic abatement barrier method and system |
US7562613B2 (en) * | 2003-12-19 | 2009-07-21 | The Cooper Union For The Advancement Of Science And Art | Protective structure and protective system |
US7886651B2 (en) * | 2004-11-02 | 2011-02-15 | Life Shield Engineering Systems, LLC | Shrapnel and projectile containment systems and equipment and methods for producing same |
-
2008
- 2008-09-19 US US12/234,346 patent/US20090188383A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2311358A (en) * | 1940-11-25 | 1943-02-16 | Baily Robert William | Apparatus and method for molding concrete |
US6698331B1 (en) * | 1999-03-10 | 2004-03-02 | Fraunhofer Usa, Inc. | Use of metal foams in armor systems |
US7026045B2 (en) * | 2001-07-12 | 2006-04-11 | Arc Leichtmetallkompetenzzentrum Ranshofen Gmbh | Multilayer composite armour |
US6703104B1 (en) * | 2002-01-04 | 2004-03-09 | Murray L. Neal | Panel configuration composite armor |
US7562613B2 (en) * | 2003-12-19 | 2009-07-21 | The Cooper Union For The Advancement Of Science And Art | Protective structure and protective system |
US7415806B2 (en) * | 2004-07-08 | 2008-08-26 | Davidson Thomas D | Ballistic abatement barrier method and system |
US7886651B2 (en) * | 2004-11-02 | 2011-02-15 | Life Shield Engineering Systems, LLC | Shrapnel and projectile containment systems and equipment and methods for producing same |
US20080141853A1 (en) * | 2006-07-13 | 2008-06-19 | Amos Klein | Protective layer and method for installing same |
US7350450B1 (en) * | 2006-09-18 | 2008-04-01 | Battelle Energy Alliance, Llc | Armor structures |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Piran Aghl et al. | Full-scale experimental study of impact demands resulting from high mass, low velocity debris | |
Chan et al. | Evaluation of yielding shear panel device for passive energy dissipation | |
Tsai et al. | Pseudo‐dynamic test of a full‐scale CFT/BRB frame—Part II: Seismic performance of buckling‐restrained braces and connections | |
Main | Composite floor systems under column loss: Collapse resistance and tie force requirements | |
Wilson et al. | In-plane orthotropic behavior of timber floor diaphragms in unreinforced masonry buildings | |
Mahmoud et al. | Simulation of the response of base-isolated buildings under earthquake excitations considering soil flexibility | |
Li et al. | Study of a new type of replaceable coupling beam in reinforced concrete shear wall structures | |
Lacroix et al. | Retrofit options for light-frame wood stud walls subjected to blast loading | |
Guo et al. | Hysteretic analysis of steel plate shear walls (SPSWs) and a modified strip model for SPSWs | |
Anastasopoulos et al. | On the development of novel mitigation techniques against faulting–induced deformation:“Smart” barriers and sacrificial members | |
Lederman et al. | Experimental characterization of hazard-resilient ductile iron pipe soil/structure interaction under axial displacement | |
Aghl et al. | Effect of nonstructural mass on debris impact demands: Experimental and simulation studies | |
Varoglu et al. | Midply wood shear wall system: Performance in dynamic testing | |
Kim et al. | Panel zone deformation capacity as affected by weld fracture at column kinking location | |
Alhawamdeh et al. | Uplift capacity of light-frame rafter to top plates connections applied with elastomeric construction adhesives | |
Khan et al. | Push over analysis of tall building with soft stories at different levels | |
Li et al. | Case study of GFRP as a sheet-pile wall for stream bank protection in Taiwan | |
US20090188383A1 (en) | Anti-penetrating Sandwich Structure | |
Jiren et al. | Seismic Dynamic Damage Characteristics of Vertical and Batter Pile-supported Wharf Structure Systems. | |
Endo et al. | Seismic behaviour of a 20th century heritage structure built of welded tuff masonry and timber frames | |
Moradi et al. | Resistance of concrete masonry walls with membrane catcher systems subjected to blast loading | |
Haque et al. | Seismic response analysis of base isolated highway bridge: Effectiveness of using laminated rubber bearings | |
Zhou et al. | Seismic performance of composite steel plate reinforced concrete shear wall | |
Sołtysik et al. | Earthquake-induced pounding between asymmetric steel buildings | |
Oesterle et al. | Response of concrete masonry walls to simulated blast loads |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |