Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

US20090188383A1 - Anti-penetrating Sandwich Structure - Google Patents

Anti-penetrating Sandwich Structure Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090188383A1
US20090188383A1 US12/234,346 US23434608A US2009188383A1 US 20090188383 A1 US20090188383 A1 US 20090188383A1 US 23434608 A US23434608 A US 23434608A US 2009188383 A1 US2009188383 A1 US 2009188383A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
penetrating
steel structure
combined steel
soil
layer
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/234,346
Inventor
Ching-Min Huang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US12/234,346 priority Critical patent/US20090188383A1/en
Publication of US20090188383A1 publication Critical patent/US20090188383A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H5/00Armour; Armour plates
    • F41H5/24Armour; Armour plates for stationary use, e.g. fortifications ; Shelters; Guard Booths
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H5/00Armour; Armour plates
    • F41H5/02Plate construction
    • F41H5/04Plate construction composed of more than one layer
    • F41H5/0442Layered armour containing metal
    • F41H5/0457Metal layers in combination with additional layers made of fibres, fabrics or plastics

Definitions

  • the anti-penetrating sandwich structure is built under the ground's surface as a protective measure for buildings underneath it, when under attack by penetrating weapons.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)

Abstract

The proposed new structure, Anti-penetrating Sandwich Structure, can protect the building underground.

Description

    BRIEF SUMMARY
  • The anti-penetrating sandwich structure is built under the ground's surface as a protective measure for buildings underneath it, when under attack by penetrating weapons.
  • BACKGROUND
  • Important buildings that were constructed underground can survive an attack by external forces. However, the invention of penetrating weapons has increased the difficulty of solving the problem of protecting buildings from the new ordinance. In view of this, the anti-penetrating sandwich structure is built above the underground building to prevent the destruction of the buildings underneath it from attacks which employ penetrating weapons.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
    • I. Structural Materials
    • 1. The anti-penetrating sandwich structure built under the ground's surface consists of “Surface soil+parallel combined steel structure (or RC structure)+energy dissipating material+parallel combined steel structure (or RC structure)+energy dissipating material+parallel combined steel structure (or RC structure)+underground seismic building” from top downwards.
    • 2. The combined steel structure consists of steel plates or welded section steels. The variations of combined steel structure include the following:
      • (1) Welded box beam structure
      • (2) Plate girder structure
      • (3) Single folded plate structure
    • 3. The parallel combined steel structure is a combined steel structure arranged in parallel or piled pattern of design, and then combined through welding.
    • 4. Energy dissipating materials
      • (1) Engineering plastics
        • A. The accurate measurement of elasticity modulus and poisson's ratio is very important in regard to the correctness of the structural analysis.
        • B. During research and development of the engineering plastics, it is necessary to consider its flammability, and an experiment on energy dissipation should be performed as test reference.
      • (2) Soil
        • A. The accurate calculation of elasticity modulus and poisson's ratio is very important in regard to the correctness of the soil analysis.
        • B. For selection of sand-gravel, the size gradation of aggregate must be executed according to the soil categorization system, and an experiment on energy dissipation should be performed as test reference.
    • 5. When the engineering plastic is used as the energy dissipating material, the thermal expansion coefficient must be considered for adhesion between the engineering plastic and the parallel combined steel structure. Adhesive can be used to compensate for small difference in thermal expansion coefficient; for large difference in thermal expansion coefficient, the parallel combined steel structure can be nailed and then secured together with the engineering plastic.
    • II. Structural Shape
    • 1. The arch structure is a parallel combined steel structure that exhibits an upward arching pattern.
    • 2. The grid beams and panel surface are the structural patterns above the RC (Reinforced Concrete), welded box or section steel grid beams, and are bonded to the parallel combined steel structure with adhesives.
    • 3. The plane structure is the combined steel structure arranged in parallel pattern on a plane.
    • III. Structural Design
    • 1. The objective of structural design is to provide resistance to each layer against the penetrating weapons, so that the energy dissipating materials have sufficient elasticity for shape recovery.
    • 2. After the penetrating weapon hits the surface soil, the penetrating force is dispersed downwards to the parallel combined steel structure on the 1st layer where the energy dissipating material on this layer can dissipate the force.
    • 3. Structural Design
      • (1) Stage 1
        • A. Assume that the parallel combined steel structure on the 2nd layer is rigid and that the strength of the parallel combined steel structure on the 1st layer is sufficient to resist the penetration of penetrating weapons, so that the energy dissipating material on the 1st layer can disperse the force to the parallel combined steel structure on the 2nd layer and completely dissipate the penetrating force. Under such prerequisite, the required dimension derived from structural analysis can act as the design basis for the parallel combined steel structure for the 1st layer. For the structural design, please refer to the mechanics of the materials, structural mechanics, structural dynamics and the finite element method. For the soil analysis, please refer to the mechanics of materials, soil mechanics, soil dynamics and the finite element method.
        • B. The parallel combined steel structure on the 2nd layer is similar to the parallel combined steel structure on the 1st layer.
        • C. For the parallel combined steel structure on the 3rd layer, the energy dissipating material of the lower layers can adopt the following materials:
          • i. Engineering plastics
            • a. If engineering plastics are used as energy dissipating material on the 1st and 2nd layers, the engineering plastics with the same thickness can be used as the buffering energy dissipating material between the parallel combined steel structure on the 3rd layer and the underground building.
            • b. If soil is used as the energy dissipating material on the 1st and 2nd layers, the energy dissipation behavior will involve both elastic and plastic deformation. Please refer to the mechanics of materials, structural mechanics, structural dynamics and the finite element method for structural analysis.
          • ii. Soil
            • a. If engineering plastics are used as the energy dissipating material on the 1st and 2nd layers, the energy dissipation behavior will involve the draining of the void water, and soil compressiveness. Please refer to the mechanics of materials, soil mechanics, soil dynamics and the finite element method for soil analysis.
            • b. If soil is used as the energy dissipating material on the 1st and 2nd layers, soil with the same mixing ratio and thickness can be used as the buffering energy dissipating material between the parallel combined steel structure on the 3rd layer and the underground building.
      • (2) Stage 2
        • Execute the overall analysis on the anti-penetrating sandwich structure to confirm the force status and make further adjustments as necessary.
      • (3) Stage 3
        • Evaluate the probability of repetitive attack on a fixed point and carry out Stage 1 and 2 analyses, respectively, to confirm the force status and make further adjustments as necessary.
    • 4. Depending on actual requirements, determine if the pile foundation shall be erected at end-points, so that the penetrating force from the penetrating weapon can be dispersed to deeper ground.
    REFERENCE
  • Structure Systems, Heinrich Engel, 1981.

Claims (3)

1. The inventor gets a 2% royalty of the general budget of the central government.
2. The users endow a 6% royalty to medical, environmental, and charity organizations with anonymity; if contributors disclose themselves to the public, the subscription is invalid.
3. If anyone modifies this structure to apply a patent, he/she shall endow a 6% royalty to medical, environmental, and charity organizations with anonymity.
US12/234,346 2008-09-19 2008-09-19 Anti-penetrating Sandwich Structure Abandoned US20090188383A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/234,346 US20090188383A1 (en) 2008-09-19 2008-09-19 Anti-penetrating Sandwich Structure

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/234,346 US20090188383A1 (en) 2008-09-19 2008-09-19 Anti-penetrating Sandwich Structure

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090188383A1 true US20090188383A1 (en) 2009-07-30

Family

ID=40897900

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/234,346 Abandoned US20090188383A1 (en) 2008-09-19 2008-09-19 Anti-penetrating Sandwich Structure

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (1) US20090188383A1 (en)

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2311358A (en) * 1940-11-25 1943-02-16 Baily Robert William Apparatus and method for molding concrete
US6698331B1 (en) * 1999-03-10 2004-03-02 Fraunhofer Usa, Inc. Use of metal foams in armor systems
US6703104B1 (en) * 2002-01-04 2004-03-09 Murray L. Neal Panel configuration composite armor
US7026045B2 (en) * 2001-07-12 2006-04-11 Arc Leichtmetallkompetenzzentrum Ranshofen Gmbh Multilayer composite armour
US7350450B1 (en) * 2006-09-18 2008-04-01 Battelle Energy Alliance, Llc Armor structures
US20080141853A1 (en) * 2006-07-13 2008-06-19 Amos Klein Protective layer and method for installing same
US7415806B2 (en) * 2004-07-08 2008-08-26 Davidson Thomas D Ballistic abatement barrier method and system
US7562613B2 (en) * 2003-12-19 2009-07-21 The Cooper Union For The Advancement Of Science And Art Protective structure and protective system
US7886651B2 (en) * 2004-11-02 2011-02-15 Life Shield Engineering Systems, LLC Shrapnel and projectile containment systems and equipment and methods for producing same

Patent Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2311358A (en) * 1940-11-25 1943-02-16 Baily Robert William Apparatus and method for molding concrete
US6698331B1 (en) * 1999-03-10 2004-03-02 Fraunhofer Usa, Inc. Use of metal foams in armor systems
US7026045B2 (en) * 2001-07-12 2006-04-11 Arc Leichtmetallkompetenzzentrum Ranshofen Gmbh Multilayer composite armour
US6703104B1 (en) * 2002-01-04 2004-03-09 Murray L. Neal Panel configuration composite armor
US7562613B2 (en) * 2003-12-19 2009-07-21 The Cooper Union For The Advancement Of Science And Art Protective structure and protective system
US7415806B2 (en) * 2004-07-08 2008-08-26 Davidson Thomas D Ballistic abatement barrier method and system
US7886651B2 (en) * 2004-11-02 2011-02-15 Life Shield Engineering Systems, LLC Shrapnel and projectile containment systems and equipment and methods for producing same
US20080141853A1 (en) * 2006-07-13 2008-06-19 Amos Klein Protective layer and method for installing same
US7350450B1 (en) * 2006-09-18 2008-04-01 Battelle Energy Alliance, Llc Armor structures

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Piran Aghl et al. Full-scale experimental study of impact demands resulting from high mass, low velocity debris
Chan et al. Evaluation of yielding shear panel device for passive energy dissipation
Tsai et al. Pseudo‐dynamic test of a full‐scale CFT/BRB frame—Part II: Seismic performance of buckling‐restrained braces and connections
Main Composite floor systems under column loss: Collapse resistance and tie force requirements
Wilson et al. In-plane orthotropic behavior of timber floor diaphragms in unreinforced masonry buildings
Mahmoud et al. Simulation of the response of base-isolated buildings under earthquake excitations considering soil flexibility
Li et al. Study of a new type of replaceable coupling beam in reinforced concrete shear wall structures
Lacroix et al. Retrofit options for light-frame wood stud walls subjected to blast loading
Guo et al. Hysteretic analysis of steel plate shear walls (SPSWs) and a modified strip model for SPSWs
Anastasopoulos et al. On the development of novel mitigation techniques against faulting–induced deformation:“Smart” barriers and sacrificial members
Lederman et al. Experimental characterization of hazard-resilient ductile iron pipe soil/structure interaction under axial displacement
Aghl et al. Effect of nonstructural mass on debris impact demands: Experimental and simulation studies
Varoglu et al. Midply wood shear wall system: Performance in dynamic testing
Kim et al. Panel zone deformation capacity as affected by weld fracture at column kinking location
Alhawamdeh et al. Uplift capacity of light-frame rafter to top plates connections applied with elastomeric construction adhesives
Khan et al. Push over analysis of tall building with soft stories at different levels
Li et al. Case study of GFRP as a sheet-pile wall for stream bank protection in Taiwan
US20090188383A1 (en) Anti-penetrating Sandwich Structure
Jiren et al. Seismic Dynamic Damage Characteristics of Vertical and Batter Pile-supported Wharf Structure Systems.
Endo et al. Seismic behaviour of a 20th century heritage structure built of welded tuff masonry and timber frames
Moradi et al. Resistance of concrete masonry walls with membrane catcher systems subjected to blast loading
Haque et al. Seismic response analysis of base isolated highway bridge: Effectiveness of using laminated rubber bearings
Zhou et al. Seismic performance of composite steel plate reinforced concrete shear wall
Sołtysik et al. Earthquake-induced pounding between asymmetric steel buildings
Oesterle et al. Response of concrete masonry walls to simulated blast loads

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION