Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

US20070102301A1 - One-point recalibration method for reducing error in concentration measurements for an electrolytic solution - Google Patents

One-point recalibration method for reducing error in concentration measurements for an electrolytic solution Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20070102301A1
US20070102301A1 US11/563,339 US56333906A US2007102301A1 US 20070102301 A1 US20070102301 A1 US 20070102301A1 US 56333906 A US56333906 A US 56333906A US 2007102301 A1 US2007102301 A1 US 2007102301A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
electrolytic solution
concentration
electrochemical deposition
parameter
interest
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/563,339
Inventor
Jianwen Han
Mackenzie King
Glenn Tom
Steven Lurcott
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ancosys GmbH
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to US11/563,339 priority Critical patent/US20070102301A1/en
Publication of US20070102301A1 publication Critical patent/US20070102301A1/en
Assigned to ANCOSYS GMBH reassignment ANCOSYS GMBH ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY MATERIALS, INC.
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N27/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
    • G01N27/26Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating electrochemical variables; by using electrolysis or electrophoresis
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N27/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means
    • G01N27/26Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electrochemical, or magnetic means by investigating electrochemical variables; by using electrolysis or electrophoresis
    • G01N27/416Systems
    • G01N27/42Measuring deposition or liberation of materials from an electrolyte; Coulometry, i.e. measuring coulomb-equivalent of material in an electrolyte
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C25ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25DPROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PRODUCTION OF COATINGS; ELECTROFORMING; APPARATUS THEREFOR
    • C25D21/00Processes for servicing or operating cells for electrolytic coating
    • C25D21/12Process control or regulation

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for determining the concentrations of one or more components in an electrolytic solution, especially in a copper electrochemical deposition solution.
  • ECD electrochemical deposition
  • the rigorous control of the relative proportions of respective inorganic and organic ingredients in the ECD bath is critical to the achievement of satisfactory results in the rate of metal film formation and the quality of the film so formed.
  • the plating process may be affected by depletion of inorganic components and organic additives as well as by organic byproduct formation.
  • the ECD bath chemistry therefore must be maintained by periodic replacement of a part or the entire ECD bath. It is therefore important to continuously or periodically monitor the concentrations of inorganic and/or organic components in the ECD bath, and responsively add respective components to the bath to maintain the composition of the bath in an effective state for the electrochemical deposition operation.
  • the present invention in one aspect relates to a method for reducing measurement error in concentration analysis of electrolytic solutions, comprising:
  • the electrolytic solutions are copper electrochemical deposition solutions that contain copper sulfate, chloride, sulfuric acid, and optionally one or more organic additives selected from the group consisting of suppressor, accelerator, and leveler.
  • applications of the present invention are not limited to analysis of copper electrochemical deposition solutions, and it can be broadly employed for analysis of electrochemical deposition solutions that contain other metal species, such as aluminum, silver, gold, iridium, palladium, tantalum, titanium, chromium, cobalt, tungsten, tin, lead, etc., and other electrochemical deposition solutions that are free of any metal components.
  • other metal species such as aluminum, silver, gold, iridium, palladium, tantalum, titanium, chromium, cobalt, tungsten, tin, lead, etc.
  • Such method comprising the steps of:
  • a still further aspect of the present invention relates to a method for reducing measurement error in concentration analysis of electrolytic solution, comprising:
  • FIG. 1 shows five current response curves obtained under cyclic electric potentials for five electrolytic solutions, which contain copper ions at the same concentration and sulfuric acid at five different concentrations.
  • FIG. 2 shows an initial calibration curve that correlates sulfuric acid concentrations with the integrated areas of selected current peaks in the current response curves of FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 3 compares the initial calibration curve of FIG. 2 with a first re-calibration curve that is obtained by re-correlating sulfuric acid concentrations with newly conducted measurements of the integrated peak areas, and a second re-calibration curve that is obtained by mathematically modifying the initial calibration equation.
  • a cyclic electrical potential is applied between a first and a second electrode, both of which are immersed in the sample copper ECD solution for cyclic voltammetry (CV) scan thereof.
  • CV cyclic voltammetry
  • various components contained in the sample solution undergo reduction and oxidation in a cyclic manner, resulting in a characteristic current response curve that contains multiple reduction and oxidation current peaks, which are correlated with the component concentrations in such sample solution.
  • concentration of copper and/or sulfuric acid in such copper ECD solution can be determined by analyzing the copper and/or hydrogen reduction/oxidation peaks.
  • the characteristic current response curve of a sample ECD solution can be compared with the current response curves of one or more calibration solutions that contain the component of interest at known concentrations, for estimation of the concentration of such component of interest in the sample solution.
  • FIG. 1 shows the current response curves of five calibration solutions, as obtained under a cyclic electropotential that oscillates between ⁇ 0.32 volt and +1.0 volt with a scan rate of about 300 mV/second. All the calibration solutions contain copper at the same concentration and the target component, i.e., sulfuric acid, at different concentrations.
  • the target component i.e., sulfuric acid
  • the first calibration solution contains sulfuric acid at a concentration of about 8.22 g/L; the second calibration solution contains sulfuric acid at a concentration of about 9.42 g/L; the third calibration solution contains sulfuric acid at a concentration of about 10.10 g/L; the fourth calibration solution contains sulfuric acid at a concentration of about 11.22 g/L; the fifth calibration solution contains sulfuric acid at a concentration of about 12.68 g/L.
  • the current response curves contain sharply distinguishable current peaks within the electrical potential range marked by the dotted rectangular box (approximately the copper oxidation potential range for Cu to become Cu + ), which can be selected for sulfuric acid concentration mapping.
  • the integrated areas of the selected copper oxidation peaks in the current response curves of FIG. 1 are calculated.
  • the known sulfuric acid concentrations of the calibration solutions are then plotted as a function of such integrated peak areas, to form a calibration curve that quantitatively correlates the integrated current peak areas with the sulfuric acid concentrations, as shown in FIG. 2 .
  • Equation A and the initial calibration curve as shown in FIG. 2 can be used for mapping the concentration of sulfuric acid in sample copper ECD solutions that contain copper at the same concentration as the calibration solutions and sulfuric acid at unknown and potentially different concentrations.
  • One method for reducing such measurement caused by current response drift is to reconstruct a new calibration curve and a new empirical equation B (as shown in FIG. 3 ), based on the same method as described hereinabove and using the same group of calibration solutions that have been originally used for constructing the initial calibration curve and the initial empirical equation A.
  • the present invention provides a method for one-point re-calibration of the initial calibration curve and empirical equation, which requires only a single calibration test and provides a modified empirical equation that mathematically factors in the electrode surface state changes that have occurred since the initial measurement.
  • a standard calibration solution that contains copper at the same concentration as the original calibration solutions and sulfuric acid (i.e., the target component) at about 9.90 g/L is provided.
  • the known sulfuric acid concentration of 9.90 g/L is recorded as the standard sulfuric acid concentration Y s .
  • the actual integrated peak area, X o is calculated by CV scanning such standard calibration solution to obtain a characteristic current response curve (not shown) of such solution and calculating the integrated area of the copper oxidation current peak.
  • the actual integrated peak area X o is about 42.392 nCoul.
  • a modified calibration curve (C) reflecting such modified equation C is shown in FIG. 3 , in comparison with the initial calibration curve (A) and the new calibration curve (B) obtained by complete recalibration. It is evident that the modified calibration curve (C) closely maps the curve (B), indicating that the mathematically constructed equation C provides measurement results consistent with the empirically constructed equation B.
  • the one-point re-calibration method as described hereinabove can be generalized for modifying any initial concentration analysis model that correlates the concentration of a component of interest Y with a measurement parameter X, which can be the integrated peak area, as in the specific example described hereinabove, or any other variables that are correlative with the concentration of the component of interest and that can be measured from the sample electrolytic solution, including but not limited to, current peak height, plating/stripping potential, plating/stripping current, etc.
  • the analysis protocol may be designed to responsively initiate a re-calibration cycle when changes in the height of certain current peaks reach a predetermined threshold.
  • the analysis protocol may be designed to provide periodic re-calibration of the concentration analysis model, according to the method described hereinabove.
  • ECD electrochemical deposition
  • the methodology of the invention are not thus limited, but rather generally extend to and encompass the determination of analytes in fluid media.
  • the invention is readily applicable to other ECD process applications, including deposition of aluminum, silver, gold, iridium, palladium, tantalum, titanium, chromium, cobalt, tungsten, etc., as well as deposition of alloys and deposition of amalgams such as solder.
  • Examples of additional applications of the invention other than ECD plating of semiconductor device structures include analysis of reagents in reaction media for production of therapeutic agents such as pharmaceutical products, and biotechnology applications involving the concentrations of specific analytes in human blood or plasma. It will therefore be appreciated that the invention is of broad application, and that the ECD system and method described hereafter is but one of a myriad of potential uses for which the invention may be employed.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Electrochemistry (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Electrolytic Production Of Metals (AREA)
  • Testing Resistance To Weather, Investigating Materials By Mechanical Methods (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for mathematically re-calibrating and adjusting an initial concentration analysis model that suffers from electrochemical measurement errors caused by surface state changes in the working/counter/reference electrode after extended usage. Specifically, such recalibration method reimburses long-term drift in the electrochemical measurements based on a single point testing.

Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to a method for determining the concentrations of one or more components in an electrolytic solution, especially in a copper electrochemical deposition solution.
  • 2. Description of the Related Art
  • In electrochemical deposition (ECD) process, the rigorous control of the relative proportions of respective inorganic and organic ingredients in the ECD bath is critical to the achievement of satisfactory results in the rate of metal film formation and the quality of the film so formed. During the use of the plating bath solution, the plating process may be affected by depletion of inorganic components and organic additives as well as by organic byproduct formation. The ECD bath chemistry therefore must be maintained by periodic replacement of a part or the entire ECD bath. It is therefore important to continuously or periodically monitor the concentrations of inorganic and/or organic components in the ECD bath, and responsively add respective components to the bath to maintain the composition of the bath in an effective state for the electrochemical deposition operation.
  • In electrochemical-based analysis of organic additive concentration in the ECD bath, the surface state of the working/counter/reference electrode changes with long term operation, due to contamination, corrosion, or re-crystallization of the electrode surface material, which causes drift in the measurement results. Corresponding recalibration or adjustment of the concentration analysis results therefore is required, which is time-consuming and complicated for onsite operation.
  • It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a new method for one-point recalibration or adjustment of the concentration analysis results, to reimburse the drift in the measurement results based on one point testing and to provide a modified concentration analysis model with build-in drift reimbursement features.
  • Other objects and advantages will be more fully apparent from the ensuring disclosure and appended claims.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention in one aspect relates to a method for reducing measurement error in concentration analysis of electrolytic solutions, comprising:
      • (a) establishing an initial model for determining concentration Y of a component of interest in electrolytic solutions based on a measurable parameter X that is correlative to Y, wherein correlation between X and Y in such initial model is expressed as Y=f(X);
      • (b) providing a standard electrolytic solution that contains the component of interest at a known concentration Ys;
      • (c) calculating a theoretical parameter value Xs for the standard electrolytic solution, wherein Xs=f−1(Ys);
      • (d) measuring the actual parameter value Xo of such standard electrolytic solution;
      • (e) determining an adjustment factor e, wherein e=Xs−Xo;
      • (f) constructing a revised model that provides Y=f(X+e) for future concentration determination of the component of interest; and
      • (g) optionally, repeating steps (b)-(f) for model revision on a periodical or threshold basis.
  • In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the electrolytic solutions are copper electrochemical deposition solutions that contain copper sulfate, chloride, sulfuric acid, and optionally one or more organic additives selected from the group consisting of suppressor, accelerator, and leveler.
  • However, applications of the present invention are not limited to analysis of copper electrochemical deposition solutions, and it can be broadly employed for analysis of electrochemical deposition solutions that contain other metal species, such as aluminum, silver, gold, iridium, palladium, tantalum, titanium, chromium, cobalt, tungsten, tin, lead, etc., and other electrochemical deposition solutions that are free of any metal components.
  • Another aspect of the present invention relates to a method for recalibrating a predetermined concentration analysis model, in which concentration Y of a target component in electrolytic solutions is determined by a measurable parameter X and a function Y=f(X).
  • Such method comprising the steps of:
      • (a) providing a standard electrolytic solution that contains the target component at a known concentration Ys;
      • (b) calculating a theoretical parameter value Xs for such standard solution, based on Ys and inverse of the function Y=f(X);
      • (c) measuring the actual parameter value Xo of such standard solution;
      • (d) determining an adjustment factor e, wherein e=Xs−Xo; and
      • (e) constructing a recalibrated concentration analysis model that provides Y=f(X+e).
  • A still further aspect of the present invention relates to a method for reducing measurement error in concentration analysis of electrolytic solution, comprising:
      • (a) establishing an initial model for determining concentration Y of a component of interest in electrolytic solution based on a measurable parameter X that is correlative to Y, wherein correlation between X and Y in such initial model is expressed as Y=f(X);
      • (b) providing a standard electrolytic solution that contains the component of interest at a known concentration Ys;
      • (c) calculating a theoretical parameter value Xs for the standard electrolytic solution, wherein Xs=f−1(Ys);
      • (d) measuring the actual parameter value Xo of the standard electrolytic solution;
      • (e) determining an adjustment factor e, wherein e = X s X 0 ;
      • (f) constructing a revised model that provides Y=f(X×e) for future concentration determination of the component of interest; and
      • (g) optionally, repeating steps (b)-(f) for model revision on a periodical or threshold basis.
  • A still further aspect of the present invention relates to a method for recalibrating a predetermined concentration analysis model, in which concentration Y of a target component in electrolytic solution is determined by a measurable parameter X and a function Y=f(X), said method comprising the steps of:
      • (a) providing a standard electrolytic solution that contains the target component at a known concentration Ys;
      • (b) calculating a theoretical parameter value Xs for the standard solution, based on Ys and inverse of the function Y=f(X);
      • (c) measuring the actual parameter value Xo of the standard solution;
      • (d) determining an adjustment factor e, wherein e = X s X 0 ;
      • (e) constructing a recalibrated concentration analysis model that provides Y=f(X×e).
  • Other aspects, features and embodiments of the present invention will be more fully apparent from the ensuing disclosure and appended claims.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 shows five current response curves obtained under cyclic electric potentials for five electrolytic solutions, which contain copper ions at the same concentration and sulfuric acid at five different concentrations.
  • FIG. 2 shows an initial calibration curve that correlates sulfuric acid concentrations with the integrated areas of selected current peaks in the current response curves of FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 3 compares the initial calibration curve of FIG. 2 with a first re-calibration curve that is obtained by re-correlating sulfuric acid concentrations with newly conducted measurements of the integrated peak areas, and a second re-calibration curve that is obtained by mathematically modifying the initial calibration equation.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION, AND PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS THEREOF
  • In an electrochemical analytical cell used for analyzing sample copper ECD solutions, a cyclic electrical potential is applied between a first and a second electrode, both of which are immersed in the sample copper ECD solution for cyclic voltammetry (CV) scan thereof. During the CV scan, various components contained in the sample solution undergo reduction and oxidation in a cyclic manner, resulting in a characteristic current response curve that contains multiple reduction and oxidation current peaks, which are correlated with the component concentrations in such sample solution. For example, concentration of copper and/or sulfuric acid in such copper ECD solution can be determined by analyzing the copper and/or hydrogen reduction/oxidation peaks.
  • Further, the characteristic current response curve of a sample ECD solution can be compared with the current response curves of one or more calibration solutions that contain the component of interest at known concentrations, for estimation of the concentration of such component of interest in the sample solution.
  • FIG. 1 shows the current response curves of five calibration solutions, as obtained under a cyclic electropotential that oscillates between −0.32 volt and +1.0 volt with a scan rate of about 300 mV/second. All the calibration solutions contain copper at the same concentration and the target component, i.e., sulfuric acid, at different concentrations. Specifically, the first calibration solution contains sulfuric acid at a concentration of about 8.22 g/L; the second calibration solution contains sulfuric acid at a concentration of about 9.42 g/L; the third calibration solution contains sulfuric acid at a concentration of about 10.10 g/L; the fourth calibration solution contains sulfuric acid at a concentration of about 11.22 g/L; the fifth calibration solution contains sulfuric acid at a concentration of about 12.68 g/L.
  • As shown in FIG. 1, the current response curves contain sharply distinguishable current peaks within the electrical potential range marked by the dotted rectangular box (approximately the copper oxidation potential range for Cu to become Cu+), which can be selected for sulfuric acid concentration mapping.
  • Subsequently, the integrated areas of the selected copper oxidation peaks in the current response curves of FIG. 1 are calculated. The known sulfuric acid concentrations of the calibration solutions are then plotted as a function of such integrated peak areas, to form a calibration curve that quantitatively correlates the integrated current peak areas with the sulfuric acid concentrations, as shown in FIG. 2. An empirical equation A is preferably constructed on the basis of such calibration curve, which correlates the integrated current peak area X (in nCoul) with the sulfuric acid concentration Y (in g/L) via the following function:
    Y=345.22·X −0.974
  • Equation A and the initial calibration curve as shown in FIG. 2 can be used for mapping the concentration of sulfuric acid in sample copper ECD solutions that contain copper at the same concentration as the calibration solutions and sulfuric acid at unknown and potentially different concentrations.
  • However, after an extended period of time, the current responses measured from the sample copper ECD solutions will start to drift, due to changes in the surface state of the working/counter/reference electrode caused by contamination, corrosion, or re-crystallization of the electrode surface material. Consequently, the current response drift will result in significant errors in the sulfuric acid concentration determination.
  • One method for reducing such measurement caused by current response drift is to reconstruct a new calibration curve and a new empirical equation B (as shown in FIG. 3), based on the same method as described hereinabove and using the same group of calibration solutions that have been originally used for constructing the initial calibration curve and the initial empirical equation A. In other words, a new and independent round of calibration measurements is carried out to provide a new calibration curve and a new equation B containing the new function:
    Y=494.69·X −1.0436
    which factors in the electrode surface state changes that have occurred during the initial measurement and the new measurement.
  • However, such complete reconstruction of the calibration curve and empirical equation is very time- and labor-consuming, and it significantly extended the down-time needed for system readjustment. Such extended down-time is particularly disadvantageous when the system requires periodic readjustments.
  • Therefore, the present invention provides a method for one-point re-calibration of the initial calibration curve and empirical equation, which requires only a single calibration test and provides a modified empirical equation that mathematically factors in the electrode surface state changes that have occurred since the initial measurement.
  • Specifically, a standard calibration solution that contains copper at the same concentration as the original calibration solutions and sulfuric acid (i.e., the target component) at about 9.90 g/L is provided. The known sulfuric acid concentration of 9.90 g/L is recorded as the standard sulfuric acid concentration Ys. Based on the initial empirical equation A and Ys, a standard integrated peak area, Xs, is calculated by inverting equation A, as follows: X s = Y s 345.22 - 0.974 = 38.4015
  • Subsequently, the actual integrated peak area, Xo, is calculated by CV scanning such standard calibration solution to obtain a characteristic current response curve (not shown) of such solution and calculating the integrated area of the copper oxidation current peak. The actual integrated peak area Xo is about 42.392 nCoul.
  • Based on Xs and Xo, an adjustment factor e is calculated as:
    e=X s −X o=38.4015−42.392=−3.99048
  • Such adjustment factor e is employed to mathematically construct a modified equation C based on the initial equation A, while equation C provides:
    Y=345.22(X−3.99048)−0.974
  • A modified calibration curve (C) reflecting such modified equation C is shown in FIG. 3, in comparison with the initial calibration curve (A) and the new calibration curve (B) obtained by complete recalibration. It is evident that the modified calibration curve (C) closely maps the curve (B), indicating that the mathematically constructed equation C provides measurement results consistent with the empirically constructed equation B.
  • The one-point re-calibration method as described hereinabove can be generalized for modifying any initial concentration analysis model that correlates the concentration of a component of interest Y with a measurement parameter X, which can be the integrated peak area, as in the specific example described hereinabove, or any other variables that are correlative with the concentration of the component of interest and that can be measured from the sample electrolytic solution, including but not limited to, current peak height, plating/stripping potential, plating/stripping current, etc.
  • When the initial concentration analysis model describes the correlation between the concentration of the component of interest Y and the measurable parameter X as Y=f(X), the one-point re-calibration method of the present invention provides a modified concentration analysis model that defines Y=f(X−e) with an adjustment factor e.
  • Such adjustment factor e is obtained by providing a standard calibration solution that contains the component of interest at a known concentration Ys, calculating a theoretical parameter value Xs based on inverse of the function provided by the initial concentration analysis model, i.e., Xs=f1(Ys), measuring the actual parameter value Xo for such standard calibration solution, and determining the difference between Xs and Xo (i.e., e=Xs−Xo).
  • Alternatively, the modified concentration analysis model may define Y=f(X×e) with an adjustment factor e that is determined by the ratio between Xs and Xo (i.e., e=Xs/Xo).
  • When cyclic voltammetry is employed for the concentration analysis, any anomaly in the shapes and/or magnitudes of various current peaks contained in the current response curves of the sample solutions constitutes a good indicator of electrode surface state changes. Therefore, the current response curves of the sample solutions can be continuously or periodically reviewed for determining the necessity of re-calibration or system adjustment. For example, the analysis protocol may be designed to responsively initiate a re-calibration cycle when changes in the height of certain current peaks reach a predetermined threshold. Alternatively, the analysis protocol may be designed to provide periodic re-calibration of the concentration analysis model, according to the method described hereinabove.
  • While the ensuing description is primarily directed to an electrochemical deposition (ECD) system for copper deposition, it will be recognized that the methodology of the invention are not thus limited, but rather generally extend to and encompass the determination of analytes in fluid media. For example, the invention is readily applicable to other ECD process applications, including deposition of aluminum, silver, gold, iridium, palladium, tantalum, titanium, chromium, cobalt, tungsten, etc., as well as deposition of alloys and deposition of amalgams such as solder.
  • Examples of additional applications of the invention other than ECD plating of semiconductor device structures include analysis of reagents in reaction media for production of therapeutic agents such as pharmaceutical products, and biotechnology applications involving the concentrations of specific analytes in human blood or plasma. It will therefore be appreciated that the invention is of broad application, and that the ECD system and method described hereafter is but one of a myriad of potential uses for which the invention may be employed.
  • While the invention has been described herein with reference to specific aspects, features and embodiments, it will be recognized that the invention is not thus limited, but rather extends to and encompasses other variations, modifications and alternative embodiments. Accordingly, the invention is intended to be broadly interpreted and construed to encompass all such other variations, modifications, and alternative embodiments, as being within the scope and spirit of the invention as hereinafter claimed.

Claims (20)

1. A method of analyzing concentration of a component of interest in an electrolytic solution, said method comprising:
(a) establishing an initial model for determining concentration as a function of a measurable parameter;
(b) providing a standard electrolytic solution that contains the component of interest at a known concentration;
(c) calculating the theoretical value for the measurable parameter from the function;
(d) measuring the actual parameter of the solution;
(e) determining an adjustment factor based on the theoretical and actual parameters; and
(f) constructing a revised model that calculates the concentration as a function of the parameter as adjusted by the adjustment factor.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising repeating steps (b)-(f) to revise the model.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein said repeating is conducted on a periodical or threshold basis.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein said electrolytic solution comprises electrochemical deposition solution containing one or more metal components.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein said metal components are selected from the group consisting of aluminum, silver, gold, iridium, palladium, tantalum, titanium, chromium, cobalt, tungsten, tin, and lead.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the adjustment factor is determined as the difference between the theoretical calculated value of the parameter and the measured actual parameter value, and wherein the adjustment factor is added to the measurable parameter in constructing the revised model.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein said electrolytic solution contains organic and inorganic components.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein said electrolytic solution comprises copper electrochemical deposition solution.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein said copper electrochemical deposition solution contains copper sulfate, chloride and sulfuric acid.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein said copper electrochemical deposition solution further comprises one or more organic additives selected from the group consisting of suppressors, accelerators, and levelers.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the component of interest is sulfuric acid.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the component of interest is copper.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the measurable parameter is obtained by immersing first and second electrodes in the electrolytic solution, applying a cyclic electrical potential between the first and second electrodes, and analyzing current response of the electrolytic solution.
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the current response of the electrolytic solution contains one or more current peaks, and wherein said measurable parameter is the integrated area of one of said current peaks.
15. The method of claim 1, as conducted in an electrochemical deposition process.
16. A method of operating an electrochemical deposition process including an electrochemical deposition bath containing electrolytic solution, said method comprising:
analyzing concentration of a component of interest in the electrolytic solution, comprising:
(a) establishing an initial model for determining concentration as a function of a measurable parameter;
(b) providing a standard electrolytic solution that contains the component of interest at a known concentration;
(c) calculating the theoretical value for the measurable parameter from the function;
(d) measuring the actual parameter of the solution;
(e) determining an adjustment factor based on the theoretical and actual parameters; and
(f) constructing a revised model that calculates the concentration as a function of an adjusted parameter, wherein the adjusted parameter is equal to the measurable parameter plus the adjustment factor, and wherein the adjustment factor is determined as the difference between the theoretical parameter value and the actual parameter value; and
adjusting composition of the bath in accordance with the revised model.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein the electrochemical deposition process comprises a copper electrochemical deposition process.
18. The method of claim 16, wherein the component of interest is selected from the group consisting of sulfuric acid and copper.
19. The method of claim 16, wherein the electrochemical deposition process comprises an electrochemical deposition process for depositing a material selected from the group consisting of aluminum, silver, gold, iridium, palladium, tantalum, titanium, chromium, cobalt, tungsten, and alloys and amalgams containing one or more of the foregoing.
20. The method of claim 16, wherein said adjusting composition of the bath in accordance with the revised model, comprises addition of one or more components to the bath to maintain composition of the bath in an effective state for electrochemical deposition operation.
US11/563,339 2004-04-27 2006-11-27 One-point recalibration method for reducing error in concentration measurements for an electrolytic solution Abandoned US20070102301A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/563,339 US20070102301A1 (en) 2004-04-27 2006-11-27 One-point recalibration method for reducing error in concentration measurements for an electrolytic solution

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/833,192 US7141156B2 (en) 2004-04-27 2004-04-27 One-point recalibration method for reducing error in concentration measurements for an electrolytic solution
US11/563,339 US20070102301A1 (en) 2004-04-27 2006-11-27 One-point recalibration method for reducing error in concentration measurements for an electrolytic solution

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/833,192 Continuation US7141156B2 (en) 2004-04-27 2004-04-27 One-point recalibration method for reducing error in concentration measurements for an electrolytic solution

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20070102301A1 true US20070102301A1 (en) 2007-05-10

Family

ID=35135337

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/833,192 Active 2025-05-19 US7141156B2 (en) 2004-04-27 2004-04-27 One-point recalibration method for reducing error in concentration measurements for an electrolytic solution
US11/563,339 Abandoned US20070102301A1 (en) 2004-04-27 2006-11-27 One-point recalibration method for reducing error in concentration measurements for an electrolytic solution

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/833,192 Active 2025-05-19 US7141156B2 (en) 2004-04-27 2004-04-27 One-point recalibration method for reducing error in concentration measurements for an electrolytic solution

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (2) US7141156B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1747449A4 (en)
KR (1) KR20070005732A (en)
WO (1) WO2005108649A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7141156B2 (en) * 2004-04-27 2006-11-28 Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. One-point recalibration method for reducing error in concentration measurements for an electrolytic solution
CA2705741C (en) * 2007-11-13 2013-07-16 F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ag Method for monitoring the use of consumables of a disposable type in one or more analysis devices
DE102008015145A1 (en) * 2008-03-20 2009-10-01 Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Gmbh Method for recalibrating sensors and calibrating other sensors
CN102246176B (en) * 2008-12-12 2015-11-25 霍夫曼-拉罗奇有限公司 For the method and system of the data of administrative analysis equipment
CN110186980B (en) * 2019-04-19 2022-10-25 九江德福科技股份有限公司 Quantitative analysis method for displacement agent in high-tensile electrolyte

Citations (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4436595A (en) * 1981-06-05 1984-03-13 Metal Surfaces, Inc. Electroplating bath and method
US5192403A (en) * 1991-05-16 1993-03-09 International Business Machines Corporation Cyclic voltammetric method for the measurement of concentrations of subcomponents of plating solution additive mixtures
US5223118A (en) * 1991-03-08 1993-06-29 Shipley Company Inc. Method for analyzing organic additives in an electroplating bath
US6280602B1 (en) * 1999-10-20 2001-08-28 Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. Method and apparatus for determination of additives in metal plating baths
US6365033B1 (en) * 1999-05-03 2002-04-02 Semitoof, Inc. Methods for controlling and/or measuring additive concentration in an electroplating bath
US20030080000A1 (en) * 2001-08-09 2003-05-01 Robertson Peter M. Interference correction of additives concentration measurements in metal electroplating solutions
US6572753B2 (en) * 2001-10-01 2003-06-03 Eci Technology, Inc. Method for analysis of three organic additives in an acid copper plating bath
US20030188977A1 (en) * 2002-04-03 2003-10-09 Eci Technology, Inc. Voltammetric reference electrode calibration
US20030201191A1 (en) * 2002-04-29 2003-10-30 Applied Materials, Inc. Electrochemical method for direct organic additives analysis in copper baths
US6709561B1 (en) * 2002-11-06 2004-03-23 Eci Technology, Inc. Measurement of the concentration of a reducing agent in an electroless plating bath
US6808611B2 (en) * 2002-06-27 2004-10-26 Applied Materials, Inc. Methods in electroanalytical techniques to analyze organic components in plating baths
US7141156B2 (en) * 2004-04-27 2006-11-28 Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. One-point recalibration method for reducing error in concentration measurements for an electrolytic solution

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2004009880A1 (en) * 2002-07-19 2004-01-29 Technic, Inc. Method and apparatus for real time monitoring of industrial electrolytes

Patent Citations (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4436595A (en) * 1981-06-05 1984-03-13 Metal Surfaces, Inc. Electroplating bath and method
US5223118A (en) * 1991-03-08 1993-06-29 Shipley Company Inc. Method for analyzing organic additives in an electroplating bath
US5192403A (en) * 1991-05-16 1993-03-09 International Business Machines Corporation Cyclic voltammetric method for the measurement of concentrations of subcomponents of plating solution additive mixtures
US6365033B1 (en) * 1999-05-03 2002-04-02 Semitoof, Inc. Methods for controlling and/or measuring additive concentration in an electroplating bath
US6280602B1 (en) * 1999-10-20 2001-08-28 Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. Method and apparatus for determination of additives in metal plating baths
US6936157B2 (en) * 2001-08-09 2005-08-30 Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. Interference correction of additives concentration measurements in metal electroplating solutions
US20030080000A1 (en) * 2001-08-09 2003-05-01 Robertson Peter M. Interference correction of additives concentration measurements in metal electroplating solutions
US6572753B2 (en) * 2001-10-01 2003-06-03 Eci Technology, Inc. Method for analysis of three organic additives in an acid copper plating bath
US6733656B2 (en) * 2002-04-03 2004-05-11 Eci Technology Inc. Voltammetric reference electrode calibration
US20030188977A1 (en) * 2002-04-03 2003-10-09 Eci Technology, Inc. Voltammetric reference electrode calibration
US20030201191A1 (en) * 2002-04-29 2003-10-30 Applied Materials, Inc. Electrochemical method for direct organic additives analysis in copper baths
US6808611B2 (en) * 2002-06-27 2004-10-26 Applied Materials, Inc. Methods in electroanalytical techniques to analyze organic components in plating baths
US6709561B1 (en) * 2002-11-06 2004-03-23 Eci Technology, Inc. Measurement of the concentration of a reducing agent in an electroless plating bath
US7141156B2 (en) * 2004-04-27 2006-11-28 Advanced Technology Materials, Inc. One-point recalibration method for reducing error in concentration measurements for an electrolytic solution

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1747449A2 (en) 2007-01-31
US7141156B2 (en) 2006-11-28
WO2005108649A3 (en) 2006-12-07
KR20070005732A (en) 2007-01-10
US20050236273A1 (en) 2005-10-27
EP1747449A4 (en) 2008-07-16
WO2005108649A2 (en) 2005-11-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7270733B2 (en) Method and apparatus for real time monitoring of industrial electrolytes
US6673226B1 (en) Voltammetric measurement of halide ion concentration
US6365033B1 (en) Methods for controlling and/or measuring additive concentration in an electroplating bath
EP1203950B1 (en) Plating bath analysis
US20070261963A1 (en) Simultaneous inorganic, organic and byproduct analysis in electrochemical deposition solutions
WO2009029268A1 (en) Detection of additive breakdown products in acid copper plating baths
Chaisiwamongkhol et al. Optimising amperometric pH sensing in blood samples: an iridium oxide electrode for blood pH sensing
US20070102301A1 (en) One-point recalibration method for reducing error in concentration measurements for an electrolytic solution
US10557819B2 (en) Electrolytic copper plating solution analyzer, and electrolytic copper plating solution analysis method
EP1490675A2 (en) Reference electrode calibration for voltammetric plating bath analysis
KR101511408B1 (en) Method for control of stabilizer additives in electroless metal and metal alloy plating electroylytes
WO1999057549A1 (en) Measuring additive concentration in an electroplating bath
US6984299B2 (en) Methods for determining organic component concentrations in an electrolytic solution
US8142640B2 (en) Chloride analysis in acid copper plating baths
US7384535B2 (en) Bath analysis
CN114280131A (en) Plating solution full-automatic analysis method and computer-readable storage medium
US20240125730A1 (en) Non-reagent chloride analysis in acid copper plating baths
US20050236280A1 (en) Methods for analyzing inorganic components of an electrolytic solution, and /or cleaning an electrochemical analytical cell
US20240133074A1 (en) System for the Simultaneous Monitoring of Constituents of an Electroplating Bath
Bratin et al. Control of damascene copper processes by cyclic voltammetric stripping
JP2000193640A (en) Measuring method for metal adsorbing material
USRE38931E1 (en) Methods for controlling and/or measuring additive concentration in an electroplating bath

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ANCOSYS GMBH, GERMANY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY MATERIALS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:026575/0114

Effective date: 20110517

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION